-
Internal solitary waves exist widely in the oceans, and their generations, propagation evolutions, and dissipations have profound effects on the ocean environment, topography, and marine structures. Typically, two basic theoretical models are now being developed to govern the evolutions of internal solitary waves at the interface of two immiscible inviscid fluids. One is a unidirectional wave propagation model described by the KdV (Korteweg-de Vries) equation, and the other is a bidirectional wave propagation model depicted by the Miyata-Choi-Camassa (MCC) equation. Neither of them, however, can effectively characterize the course of the evolution of large-amplitude internal solitary wave. In this paper, a modified unidirectional internal solitary wave model is established by adjusting the coefficients of the original unidirectional model. The adjusted coefficients are determined through asymptotic analysis by matching with the MCC model. The efficacy of the modified coefficients is investigated by comparing the modified model with the original model. The experiments on the generation of internal solitary waves with varying amplitudes are carried out by comparing the internal solitary wave solution of the modified equation. It is shown that the modified model is suitable for describing the waveform of internal solitary waves with small, medium, and large amplitudes within the limiting amplitude of the MCC model. By quantitatively analyzing the agreement of the effective wavelength, wave speed, and waveform of steady-state internal solitary waves between the unidirectional model and the MCC model, the applicability of the modified model in characterization of the properties of steady-state internal solitary waves is further investigated. In addition, the stability of unidirectional theoretical model is analyzed for simulating the propagation of large-amplitude internal solitary wave under flat bottom condition. It is found that the unidirectional model is suitable for initiating its own internal solitary solution provided that the numerical scheme is stable. It is shown that the modified unidirectional model can be used to characterize large-amplitude internal solitary waves, and is also expected to be applied to the study of marine structure hydrodynamics.
-
Keywords:
- internal solitary waves /
- theoretical model /
- two-layer fluid /
- strong nonlinerity
[1] Cai S, Xie J, He J 2012 Surv. Geophys. 33 927Google Scholar
[2] Alford, H M, Lien, Ren-Chieh, Simmons, Harper, Klymak, Jody, Ramp, Steve, Yang, Jang Y, Tang, David, Chang, Ming-Huei 2010 J. Phys. Oceanogr. 40 1338
[3] Klymak J M, Pinkel R, Liu C T, Liu A K, David L 2006 Geophys. Res. Lett. 33 L11607
[4] Huang X, Chen Z, Zhao W, Zhang Z, Zhou C, Yang Q, Tian J 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 1Google Scholar
[5] Alford M H, Peacock T, MacKinnon J A, Nash J D, Buijsman M C, Centurioni L R, Chao S Y, Chang M H, Farmer D M, Fringer O B 2015 Nature 521 65Google Scholar
[6] Holloway P E, Pelinovsky E, Talipova T 1999 J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 104 18333Google Scholar
[7] Holloway P E, Pelinovsky E, Talipova T, Barnes B 1997 J. Phys. Oceanogr. 27 871Google Scholar
[8] 郅长红, 陈科, 尤云祥 2021 上海交通大学学报 55 916Google Scholar
Zhi C, Chen K, You Y 2021 J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. Sci. 55 916Google Scholar
[9] Zhi C, Chen K, You Y 2018 J. Ocean Eng. Sci. 3 83Google Scholar
[10] Zou L, Du B Y, Ma X Y, Li Z H, Zhang Z H 2019 Chinese Congress of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics. Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, August 25–28, 2019 p13
[11] Miyata M 1985 Lamer 23 43
[12] Miyata M 1988 Nonlinear water waves (Springer) pp399–406
[13] Choi W, Camassa R 1999 J. Fluid Mech. 396 1Google Scholar
[14] Michallet H, Barthelemy E 1998 J. Fluid Mech. 366 159Google Scholar
[15] Ostrovsky L A, Grue J 2003 Phys. Fluids 15 2934Google Scholar
[16] Zhao B, Wang Z, Duan W, Ertekin R C, Hayatdavoodi M, Zhang T 2020 J. Fluid Mech. 899 A17Google Scholar
[17] Kodaira T, Waseda T, Miyata M, Choi W 2016 J. Fluid Mech. 804 201Google Scholar
[18] Choi W, Camassa R 1996 J. Fluid Mech. 313 83Google Scholar
[19] Choi W, Zhi C, Barros R 2020 Ocean Model. 151 101643Google Scholar
[20] Jo T C, Choi W 2002 Stud. Appl. Math. 109 205Google Scholar
[21] Zhi C H, Wang H, Chen K, You Y X 2021 Ocean Eng. 223 108645Google Scholar
[22] 郅长红, 陈科, 尤云祥 2021 水动力学研究与进展(A辑) 36 395Google Scholar
Zhi C H, Chen K, You Y X 2021 Chinese J. Hydrodyn. 36 395Google Scholar
[23] 黄文昊, 尤云祥, 王旭, 胡天群 2013 物理学报 62 084705Google Scholar
Huang W H, You Y X, Wang X, Hu T Q 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 084705Google Scholar
-
图 5 KdV型稳态内孤立波与eKdV, aHOU和MCC型方程稳态内孤立波波形的比较 (a)
$|a|/h$ = 0.010; (b)$|a|/h$ = 0.015; (c)$|a|/h$ = 0.020; (d)$|a|/h$ = 0.100Figure 5. Comparison of steady-state internal solitary waveform of KdV, eKdV, aHOU and MCC models: (a)
$|a|/h$ = 0.010; (b)$|a|/ h$ = 0.015; (c)$|a|/h$ = 0.020; (d)$|a|/h$ = 0.100.图 6 eKdV型稳态内孤立波与aHOU和MCC型方程稳态内孤立波波形的比较 (a)
$|a|/h$ = 0.015; (b)$|a|/h$ = 0.030; (c)$|a|/ h$ = 0.040; (d)$|a|/h$ = 0.100Figure 6. Comparison of steady-state internal solitary waveform of eKdV, aHOU and MCC models: (a)
$|a|/h$ = 0.015; (b)$|a|/h$ = 0.030; (c)$|a|/h$ = 0.040; (d)$|a|/h$ = 0.100.图 7 aHOU型稳态内孤立波与MCC型方程稳态内孤立波波形的比较 (a)
$|a|/h$ = 0.015; (b)$|a|/h$ = 0.030; (c)$|a|/h$ = 0.070; (d)$|a|/h$ = 0.110; (e)$|a|/h$ = 0.150; (f)$|a|/h$ = 0.290Figure 7. Comparison of the steady-state internal solitary waveform between aHOU and MCC models: (a)
$|a|/h$ = 0.015; (b)$|a|/h$ = 0.030; (c)$|a|/h$ = 0.070; (d)$|a|/h$ = 0.110; (e)$|a|/h$ = 0.150; (f)$|a|/h$ = 0.290.表 1 三类孤立波理论稳态解波形的契合度
Table 1. Waveform fitness of three theoretical models
|a|/h $\varDelta $aHOU $\varDelta $eKdV $\varDelta $KdV 0.010 0.0702 0.0273 0.0459 0.015 0.0748 0.0402 0.0681 0.020 0.0780 0.0549 0.0931 0.025 0.0809 0.0650 0.1121 0.030 0.0828 0.0743 0.1314 0.035 0.0836 0.0852 0.1483 0.040 0.0868 0.0981 0.17197 0.045 0.0883 0.1074 0.1908 0.050 0.0879 0.1135 0.2029 0.070 0.0912 0.1494 0.2775 0.080 0.0914 0.1597 0.3037 0.090 0.0791 0.1709 0.3308 0.100 0.0878 0.1803 0.3607 0.110 0.0895 0.1888 0.3908 0.120 0.0866 0.1941 0.4143 0.130 0.0840 0.2006 0.4464 0.140 0.0842 0.2009 0.4727 0.150 0.0818 0.1972 0.4921 0.200 0.0708 0.0950 0.6075 0.250 0.0876 — — 0.260 0.0604 — — 0.270 0.0588 — — 0.280 0.0567 — — 0.290 0.0525 — — -
[1] Cai S, Xie J, He J 2012 Surv. Geophys. 33 927Google Scholar
[2] Alford, H M, Lien, Ren-Chieh, Simmons, Harper, Klymak, Jody, Ramp, Steve, Yang, Jang Y, Tang, David, Chang, Ming-Huei 2010 J. Phys. Oceanogr. 40 1338
[3] Klymak J M, Pinkel R, Liu C T, Liu A K, David L 2006 Geophys. Res. Lett. 33 L11607
[4] Huang X, Chen Z, Zhao W, Zhang Z, Zhou C, Yang Q, Tian J 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 1Google Scholar
[5] Alford M H, Peacock T, MacKinnon J A, Nash J D, Buijsman M C, Centurioni L R, Chao S Y, Chang M H, Farmer D M, Fringer O B 2015 Nature 521 65Google Scholar
[6] Holloway P E, Pelinovsky E, Talipova T 1999 J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 104 18333Google Scholar
[7] Holloway P E, Pelinovsky E, Talipova T, Barnes B 1997 J. Phys. Oceanogr. 27 871Google Scholar
[8] 郅长红, 陈科, 尤云祥 2021 上海交通大学学报 55 916Google Scholar
Zhi C, Chen K, You Y 2021 J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. Sci. 55 916Google Scholar
[9] Zhi C, Chen K, You Y 2018 J. Ocean Eng. Sci. 3 83Google Scholar
[10] Zou L, Du B Y, Ma X Y, Li Z H, Zhang Z H 2019 Chinese Congress of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics. Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, August 25–28, 2019 p13
[11] Miyata M 1985 Lamer 23 43
[12] Miyata M 1988 Nonlinear water waves (Springer) pp399–406
[13] Choi W, Camassa R 1999 J. Fluid Mech. 396 1Google Scholar
[14] Michallet H, Barthelemy E 1998 J. Fluid Mech. 366 159Google Scholar
[15] Ostrovsky L A, Grue J 2003 Phys. Fluids 15 2934Google Scholar
[16] Zhao B, Wang Z, Duan W, Ertekin R C, Hayatdavoodi M, Zhang T 2020 J. Fluid Mech. 899 A17Google Scholar
[17] Kodaira T, Waseda T, Miyata M, Choi W 2016 J. Fluid Mech. 804 201Google Scholar
[18] Choi W, Camassa R 1996 J. Fluid Mech. 313 83Google Scholar
[19] Choi W, Zhi C, Barros R 2020 Ocean Model. 151 101643Google Scholar
[20] Jo T C, Choi W 2002 Stud. Appl. Math. 109 205Google Scholar
[21] Zhi C H, Wang H, Chen K, You Y X 2021 Ocean Eng. 223 108645Google Scholar
[22] 郅长红, 陈科, 尤云祥 2021 水动力学研究与进展(A辑) 36 395Google Scholar
Zhi C H, Chen K, You Y X 2021 Chinese J. Hydrodyn. 36 395Google Scholar
[23] 黄文昊, 尤云祥, 王旭, 胡天群 2013 物理学报 62 084705Google Scholar
Huang W H, You Y X, Wang X, Hu T Q 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 084705Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 5613
- PDF Downloads: 90
- Cited By: 0