-
Fe-based amorphous and nanocrystalline alloys are considered as the preferred dual-green energy-saving materials due to their unique magnetic properties, such as high permeability, low coercivity, and near-zero saturation magnetostriction. As such, they have received extensive attention in applications like magnetic core material for high-frequency transformers, common model chokes, ground fault interrupters, and rotors in motors, over the past decades. In this work, Fe64.8Co7.2Nb4Si4.8B19.2 (in atom percent) amorphous alloy ribbons are prepared by using the single roller quenching method, then subsequently subjected to multi-field coupling heating treatment in the air which includes heating by Joule heating effect and tensile stress field. Furthermore, the longitudinally driven giant magneto-impedance effect and magnetic domain structures of ribbons are observed by using 4294A impedance analyzer and magnetic force microscopy, respectively. The magneto-crystalline anisotropy field and stress anisotropy field of ribbons are analyzed by using X-ray diffraction, random anisotropy model, and numerical fitting. Meanwhile, the concept of magnetic anisotropy competing factor (k) is proposed, from the viewpoint of magnetic anisotropy, a mechanism for regulating giant magneto-impedance effect of ribbons prepared with multi-field coupling is studied. It is found that the longitudinally driven giant magneto-impedance effect gradually transforms from the single peak to dome-like with tensile stress increasing. However, a spike and dome-like giant magneto-impedance effect appears during such transformation, which is composed of two parts: spike-like top and dome-like base. Based on the magnetic domain structure of ribbons, it is found that the typical stress-annealed transversal magnetic domain structure is observed in ribbons of
$k \leqslant 0.147$ , while nucleation and splitting phenomenon of new domains are observed at the transversal magnetic domain wall in ribbons of k > 0.147. Both longitudinally driven giant magneto-impedance effect and domain structures provide evidence to support the competing inhibition effect of magnetic anisotropy which exists in Fe-based alloy ribbon. Therefore, it is suggested that Fe-based alloys exhibit excellent stress-sensitive properties that can be understood by the competing inhibition effects of magnetic anisotropy. It is further shown that the competing inhibition effect of magnetic anisotropy is the main reason for regulating the giant magneto-impedance effect of soft magnetic materials. This multi-field coupling Fe-based alloy has good application prospects in regulating magnetic properties of magnetic materials.-
Keywords:
- multi-field coupling /
- giant magneto-impedance effect /
- magnetic domain structure /
- magnetic anisotropy competing factor
[1] Duwez P, Willens R H, Klement W 1960 J. Appl. Phys. 31 1136
[2] 汪卫华, 张哲峰 2021 金属学报 57 1Google Scholar
Wang W H, Zhang Z F 2021 Acta Metall. Sin. 57 1Google Scholar
[3] 姚可夫, 施凌翔, 陈双琴, 邵洋, 陈娜, 贾蓟丽 2018 物理学报 67 016101Google Scholar
Yao K F, Shi L X, Chen S Q, Shao Y, Chen N, Jia J L 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 016101Google Scholar
[4] Panina L V, Mohri K 1994 Appl. Phys. Lett. 65 1189
[5] Mohri K, Kawashiwa K, Yoshida H, Panina L V 1992 IEEE. Trans. Magn. 28 3150Google Scholar
[6] Indaa K, Mohri K, Inuzuka K 1994 IEEE. Trans. Magn. 30 4623Google Scholar
[7] Panina L V, Mohri K, Uchiyama T, Noda M, Bushida 1995 IEEE. Trans. Magn. 31 1249Google Scholar
[8] Kawashima K, Kohzawa K, Yoshida H, Mohri M 1993 IEEE. Trans. Magn. 29 3168Google Scholar
[9] 杨介信, 杨夑龙, 陈国, 蒋可玉, 沈国土, 胡炳元, 金若鹏 1998 中国科学 43 1051Google Scholar
Yang J X, Yang X L, Chen G, Jiang K Y, Shen G T, Hu B Y, Jin R P 1998 Chin. Sci. Bull. 43 1051Google Scholar
[10] Gong W Y, Wu Z M, Lin H, Yang J X, Zhao Z J 2008 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320 1553Google Scholar
[11] 方允樟, 许启明, 叶慧群, 郑金菊, 范晓珍, 潘日敏, 马云, 李文忠 2011 功能材料 42 1083
Fang Y Z, Xu Q M, Ye H Q, Zheng J J, Fan X Z, Pan R M, Ma Y, Li W Z 2011 Funct. Mater. 42 1083
[12] Zhukov A, Ipatov M, Churyukanova M, Talaat A, Blanco J M, Zhukova V 2017 J. Alloys Compd. 727 887Google Scholar
[13] Herzer G 2013 Acta. Mater. 61 718Google Scholar
[14] Zhukov A, Ipatov M, Corte-Leon P, Gonzalez-Legarreta L, Churyukanova M, Blanco J M, Gonzalez J, Taskaev S, Hernando B, Zhukova V 2020 J. Alloys Compd. 814 152225Google Scholar
[15] Corte-Leon P, Zhukova V, Ipatov M, Blanco J M, Gonzalez J, Zhukov A 2019 Intermetallics 105 92Google Scholar
[16] Zhukova V, Blanco J M, Ipatov M, Gonzalez J, Churyukanova M, Zhukov A 2018 Scr. Mater. 142 10Google Scholar
[17] Phan M H, Peng H X 2008 Prog. Mater. Sci. 53 323Google Scholar
[18] Ohnuma M, Yanai T, Hono K, Nakano M, Fukunaga H, Yoshizawa Y, Herzer G 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 093927Google Scholar
[19] Kernion S J, Ohodnicki P R, Grossmann J J, Leary A, Shen S, Keylin V, Huth J F, Horwath J, Lucas M S, McHenry M E 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 102408Google Scholar
[20] Iannotti V, Amoruso S, Ausanio G, Wang X, Lanotte L, Barone A C, Margaris G, Trohidou K N, Fiorani D 2011 Phys. Rev. B 83 214422Google Scholar
[21] Bolyachkin A S, Volegov A S, Kudrevatykh N V 2015 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 378 362Google Scholar
[22] Muscas G, Concas G, Laureti S, Testa A M, Mathieu R, De Toro J A, Cannas C, Musinu A, Novak M A, Sangregorio C, Lee S S, Peddis D 2018 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 28634Google Scholar
[23] 纪松, 杨国斌, 王润 1996 物理学报 45 2061Google Scholar
Ji S, Yang G B, Wang R 1996 Acta Phys. Sin. 45 2061Google Scholar
[24] Hinokihara T, Miyashita S 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 054421Google Scholar
[25] Hofmann B, Kronmüller H 1996 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 152 91Google Scholar
[26] Herzer G 1995 Scr. Metall. Mater. 33 1741Google Scholar
[27] Hernando A, Kulik T 1994 Phys. Rev. B 49 7064Google Scholar
[28] 张建强, 路飞平, 赵小龙, 何林芳 2019 磁性材料及器件 50 9
Zhang J Q, Lu F P, Zhao X L, He L F 2019 J. Magn. Mater. Device 50 9
[29] Jaafar M, Pablo-Navarro A, Berganza E, Ares P, Magén C, Masseboeuf A, Gatel C, Snoeck E, Gómez-Herrero J, Teresa J M, Asenjo A 2020 Nanoscale 12 10090Google Scholar
-
图 4 “尖刺+穹顶”状LDGMI曲线高斯拟合 (a) 180 MPa退火合金带LDGMI效应拟合; (b) 总拟合曲线; (c) “尖刺”状; (d) “穹顶”状
Figure 4. Gaussian fitting of “spike and dome” like LDGMI effect curve: (a) Fitting curve of LDGMI effect for Fe-based alloy ribbon annealed with tensile stress of 180 MPa; (b) the whole fitting curve; (c) spike shape; (d) dome shape.
表 1 未加张应力退火Fe基合金带的结构参数和磁学量参数
Table 1. Structural and magnetic parameters of Fe-based alloy annealed without tensile stress.
表 2 MFC热处理Fe基合金带LDGMI效应曲线拟合DPGF参数和磁学参数
Table 2. DPGF parameters of LDGMI effect curves and magnetic parameters of Fe-based alloy heated by MFC method.
应力
σ/MPaDPGF参数 磁各向异性场 实验值 W1 W2 R Hk/(A·m–1) Hσ/(A·m–1) Heff/(A·m–1) k Heff/(A·m–1) 94 105.64 549.94 0.997 52.82 274.97 280.00 0.195 — 180 139.97 893.04 0.986 69.98 446.52 451.97 0.157 — 260 177.79 1183.86 0.975 88.90 591.93 598.57 0.150 — 339 — — — 106.5 745.23 752.80 0.143 772.52 421 — — — 124.32 899.94 908.49 0.138 903.81 503 — — — 142.36 1056.56 1066.11 0.135 1012.43 -
[1] Duwez P, Willens R H, Klement W 1960 J. Appl. Phys. 31 1136
[2] 汪卫华, 张哲峰 2021 金属学报 57 1Google Scholar
Wang W H, Zhang Z F 2021 Acta Metall. Sin. 57 1Google Scholar
[3] 姚可夫, 施凌翔, 陈双琴, 邵洋, 陈娜, 贾蓟丽 2018 物理学报 67 016101Google Scholar
Yao K F, Shi L X, Chen S Q, Shao Y, Chen N, Jia J L 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 016101Google Scholar
[4] Panina L V, Mohri K 1994 Appl. Phys. Lett. 65 1189
[5] Mohri K, Kawashiwa K, Yoshida H, Panina L V 1992 IEEE. Trans. Magn. 28 3150Google Scholar
[6] Indaa K, Mohri K, Inuzuka K 1994 IEEE. Trans. Magn. 30 4623Google Scholar
[7] Panina L V, Mohri K, Uchiyama T, Noda M, Bushida 1995 IEEE. Trans. Magn. 31 1249Google Scholar
[8] Kawashima K, Kohzawa K, Yoshida H, Mohri M 1993 IEEE. Trans. Magn. 29 3168Google Scholar
[9] 杨介信, 杨夑龙, 陈国, 蒋可玉, 沈国土, 胡炳元, 金若鹏 1998 中国科学 43 1051Google Scholar
Yang J X, Yang X L, Chen G, Jiang K Y, Shen G T, Hu B Y, Jin R P 1998 Chin. Sci. Bull. 43 1051Google Scholar
[10] Gong W Y, Wu Z M, Lin H, Yang J X, Zhao Z J 2008 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320 1553Google Scholar
[11] 方允樟, 许启明, 叶慧群, 郑金菊, 范晓珍, 潘日敏, 马云, 李文忠 2011 功能材料 42 1083
Fang Y Z, Xu Q M, Ye H Q, Zheng J J, Fan X Z, Pan R M, Ma Y, Li W Z 2011 Funct. Mater. 42 1083
[12] Zhukov A, Ipatov M, Churyukanova M, Talaat A, Blanco J M, Zhukova V 2017 J. Alloys Compd. 727 887Google Scholar
[13] Herzer G 2013 Acta. Mater. 61 718Google Scholar
[14] Zhukov A, Ipatov M, Corte-Leon P, Gonzalez-Legarreta L, Churyukanova M, Blanco J M, Gonzalez J, Taskaev S, Hernando B, Zhukova V 2020 J. Alloys Compd. 814 152225Google Scholar
[15] Corte-Leon P, Zhukova V, Ipatov M, Blanco J M, Gonzalez J, Zhukov A 2019 Intermetallics 105 92Google Scholar
[16] Zhukova V, Blanco J M, Ipatov M, Gonzalez J, Churyukanova M, Zhukov A 2018 Scr. Mater. 142 10Google Scholar
[17] Phan M H, Peng H X 2008 Prog. Mater. Sci. 53 323Google Scholar
[18] Ohnuma M, Yanai T, Hono K, Nakano M, Fukunaga H, Yoshizawa Y, Herzer G 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 093927Google Scholar
[19] Kernion S J, Ohodnicki P R, Grossmann J J, Leary A, Shen S, Keylin V, Huth J F, Horwath J, Lucas M S, McHenry M E 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 102408Google Scholar
[20] Iannotti V, Amoruso S, Ausanio G, Wang X, Lanotte L, Barone A C, Margaris G, Trohidou K N, Fiorani D 2011 Phys. Rev. B 83 214422Google Scholar
[21] Bolyachkin A S, Volegov A S, Kudrevatykh N V 2015 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 378 362Google Scholar
[22] Muscas G, Concas G, Laureti S, Testa A M, Mathieu R, De Toro J A, Cannas C, Musinu A, Novak M A, Sangregorio C, Lee S S, Peddis D 2018 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 28634Google Scholar
[23] 纪松, 杨国斌, 王润 1996 物理学报 45 2061Google Scholar
Ji S, Yang G B, Wang R 1996 Acta Phys. Sin. 45 2061Google Scholar
[24] Hinokihara T, Miyashita S 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 054421Google Scholar
[25] Hofmann B, Kronmüller H 1996 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 152 91Google Scholar
[26] Herzer G 1995 Scr. Metall. Mater. 33 1741Google Scholar
[27] Hernando A, Kulik T 1994 Phys. Rev. B 49 7064Google Scholar
[28] 张建强, 路飞平, 赵小龙, 何林芳 2019 磁性材料及器件 50 9
Zhang J Q, Lu F P, Zhao X L, He L F 2019 J. Magn. Mater. Device 50 9
[29] Jaafar M, Pablo-Navarro A, Berganza E, Ares P, Magén C, Masseboeuf A, Gatel C, Snoeck E, Gómez-Herrero J, Teresa J M, Asenjo A 2020 Nanoscale 12 10090Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 3495
- PDF Downloads: 44
- Cited By: 0