-
The response sensitivity of CsI photocathode is an important parameter for the quantitative diagnosis of X-ray spectroscopy by soft X-ray streak camera, and its theoretical calculation has important guiding significance. The current theoretical analytical models are based on the one-dimensional random walking model of secondary electrons generated by thin film photocathodes, including the Henke model under the condition of normal incidence of X-rays and energy greater than 1 keV, and the Fraser model under variable angle incidence and photocathode thickness greater than 100 nm, which have certain limitations. In this paper, the basic expression of the probability of secondary electron transmission is introduced, and the general expression of the response sensitivity of CsI photocathode is deduced, which varies with X-ray energy E, photocathode thickness t, and angle θ between X-ray and cathode surface in a larger parameter range (X-ray energy 0.1–10 keV, photocathode thickness 10–200 nm). Finally, the theoretical calculation results of this paper are discussed by comparing it with those from the Henke model, Fraser model, literature data and experimental data on Beijing synchrotron radiation facility, which verifies the accuracy and universality of the computational model, and a theoretical reference is provided for optimally designing the CsI photocathode in high-time-resolution spectrometric quantitative measurement.
-
Keywords:
- secondary electron /
- CsI photocathode /
- X-ray /
- response sensitivity
[1] Regan S P, Delettrez J A, Epstein R, Jaanimagi P A, Yaakobi B 2002 Phys. Plasmas 9 041357Google Scholar
[2] Baumgaertel J A, Bradley P A, Hsu S C, Cobble J A, Hakel P 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 052706Google Scholar
[3] Chen H, Ma T, Nora R, Barrios M A, Scott H A 2017 Phys. Plasmas 24 072715Google Scholar
[4] 胡昕, 江少恩, 崔延莉, 黄翼翔, 丁永坤, 刘忠礼, 易荣清, 李朝光, 张景和, 张华全 2007 物理学报 56 1447Google Scholar
Hu X, Jiang S E, Cui Y L, Huang Y X, Ding Y K, Liu Z L, Yi R Q, Li C G, Zhang J H, Zhang H Q 2007 Acta Phys. Sin. 56 1447Google Scholar
[5] Dittrich T R, Hammel B A, Keane C J, McEachern R, Turner R E, Haan S W, Suter L J 1994 Phys. Rev. 73 172324Google Scholar
[6] 乔秀梅, 郑无敌, 高耀明 2015 物理学报 64 045201Google Scholar
Qiao X M, Zheng W D, Gao Y M 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 045201Google Scholar
[7] Henke B L, Knauer J P, Premaratne K 1981 J. Appl. Phys. 52 031509Google Scholar
[8] 曾鹏, 袁铮, 邓博, 袁永腾, 李志超, 刘慎业, 赵屹东, 洪才浩, 郑雷, 崔明启 2012 物理学报 61 155209Google Scholar
Zeng P, Yuan Z, Deng B, Yuan Y T, Li Z C, Liu S Y, Zhao Y D, Hong C H, Zheng L, Cui M Q 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 155209Google Scholar
[9] 李晋, 胡昕, 樊龙, 陈韬, 杨志文, 邓博, 黎宇坤, 曹柱荣, 刘慎业 2015 强激光与粒子束 27 082003Google Scholar
Li J, Hu X, Fan L, Chen T, Yang Z W, Deng B, Li Y K, Cao Z R, Liu S Y 2015 High Power Laser and Particle Beams 27 082003Google Scholar
[10] Fraser G W 1983 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. 206 251Google Scholar
[11] Fraser G W 1985 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. 228 532Google Scholar
[12] Lowney D P, Heimann P A, Padmore H A 2004 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75 103131Google Scholar
[13] 黎宇坤, 陈韬, 李晋, 杨志文, 胡昕, 邓克立, 曹柱荣 2018 物理学报 67 085203Google Scholar
Li Y K, Chen T, Li J, Yang Z W, Hu X, Deng K L, Cao Z R 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 085203Google Scholar
[14] Akkerman A, Gibrekherman A, Breskin A, Chechik R 1992 J. Appl. Phys. 72 5429Google Scholar
[15] Gibrekhterman A, Akkerman A, Breskin A, Chechik R 1993 J. Appl. Phys. 74 7506Google Scholar
[16] Kimbrough J R, Bell P M, Christianson G B 2001 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 72 748Google Scholar
[17] Kane E O 1966 Phys. Rev. 147 335Google Scholar
[18] Boutboul T, Akkerman A, Gibrekhterman A, Breskin A, Chechikb R 1999 J. Appl. Phys. 86 155841Google Scholar
[19] 赵凯华, 钟锡华 1982 光学 (北京: 北京大学出版社) 第247页
Zhao K H, Zhong X H 1982 Optics (Beijing: Peking University Press) p247
[20] 黎宇坤, 陈韬, 邓博, 袁铮, 曹柱荣 2014 强激光与粒子束 26 022002Google Scholar
Li Y K, Chen T, Deng B, Yuan Z, Cao Z R 2014 High Power Laser and Particle Beams 26 022002Google Scholar
-
图 2 不同能量 X 射线正入射时, 不同模型计算的 CsI 响应灵敏度随厚度的变化 (a) X 射线能量为 193 eV; (b) X射线能量为 525 eV; (c) X 射线能量为 2300 eV
Figure 2. Under normal incidence of X-rays with different energy, computed CsI response sensitivity as a function of thickness based on different models: (a) X-ray energy of 193 eV; (b) X-ray energy of 525 eV; (c) X-ray energy of 2300 eV.
-
[1] Regan S P, Delettrez J A, Epstein R, Jaanimagi P A, Yaakobi B 2002 Phys. Plasmas 9 041357Google Scholar
[2] Baumgaertel J A, Bradley P A, Hsu S C, Cobble J A, Hakel P 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 052706Google Scholar
[3] Chen H, Ma T, Nora R, Barrios M A, Scott H A 2017 Phys. Plasmas 24 072715Google Scholar
[4] 胡昕, 江少恩, 崔延莉, 黄翼翔, 丁永坤, 刘忠礼, 易荣清, 李朝光, 张景和, 张华全 2007 物理学报 56 1447Google Scholar
Hu X, Jiang S E, Cui Y L, Huang Y X, Ding Y K, Liu Z L, Yi R Q, Li C G, Zhang J H, Zhang H Q 2007 Acta Phys. Sin. 56 1447Google Scholar
[5] Dittrich T R, Hammel B A, Keane C J, McEachern R, Turner R E, Haan S W, Suter L J 1994 Phys. Rev. 73 172324Google Scholar
[6] 乔秀梅, 郑无敌, 高耀明 2015 物理学报 64 045201Google Scholar
Qiao X M, Zheng W D, Gao Y M 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 045201Google Scholar
[7] Henke B L, Knauer J P, Premaratne K 1981 J. Appl. Phys. 52 031509Google Scholar
[8] 曾鹏, 袁铮, 邓博, 袁永腾, 李志超, 刘慎业, 赵屹东, 洪才浩, 郑雷, 崔明启 2012 物理学报 61 155209Google Scholar
Zeng P, Yuan Z, Deng B, Yuan Y T, Li Z C, Liu S Y, Zhao Y D, Hong C H, Zheng L, Cui M Q 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 155209Google Scholar
[9] 李晋, 胡昕, 樊龙, 陈韬, 杨志文, 邓博, 黎宇坤, 曹柱荣, 刘慎业 2015 强激光与粒子束 27 082003Google Scholar
Li J, Hu X, Fan L, Chen T, Yang Z W, Deng B, Li Y K, Cao Z R, Liu S Y 2015 High Power Laser and Particle Beams 27 082003Google Scholar
[10] Fraser G W 1983 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. 206 251Google Scholar
[11] Fraser G W 1985 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. 228 532Google Scholar
[12] Lowney D P, Heimann P A, Padmore H A 2004 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75 103131Google Scholar
[13] 黎宇坤, 陈韬, 李晋, 杨志文, 胡昕, 邓克立, 曹柱荣 2018 物理学报 67 085203Google Scholar
Li Y K, Chen T, Li J, Yang Z W, Hu X, Deng K L, Cao Z R 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 085203Google Scholar
[14] Akkerman A, Gibrekherman A, Breskin A, Chechik R 1992 J. Appl. Phys. 72 5429Google Scholar
[15] Gibrekhterman A, Akkerman A, Breskin A, Chechik R 1993 J. Appl. Phys. 74 7506Google Scholar
[16] Kimbrough J R, Bell P M, Christianson G B 2001 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 72 748Google Scholar
[17] Kane E O 1966 Phys. Rev. 147 335Google Scholar
[18] Boutboul T, Akkerman A, Gibrekhterman A, Breskin A, Chechikb R 1999 J. Appl. Phys. 86 155841Google Scholar
[19] 赵凯华, 钟锡华 1982 光学 (北京: 北京大学出版社) 第247页
Zhao K H, Zhong X H 1982 Optics (Beijing: Peking University Press) p247
[20] 黎宇坤, 陈韬, 邓博, 袁铮, 曹柱荣 2014 强激光与粒子束 26 022002Google Scholar
Li Y K, Chen T, Deng B, Yuan Z, Cao Z R 2014 High Power Laser and Particle Beams 26 022002Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 2030
- PDF Downloads: 75
- Cited By: 0