-
Transition state is a key concept for chemists to understand and fine-tune the conformational changes of large biomolecules. Due to its short residence time, it is difficult to capture a transition state via experimental techniques. Characterizing transition states for a conformational change therefore is only achievable via physics-driven molecular dynamics simulations. However, unlike chemical reactions which involve only a small number of atoms, conformational changes of biomolecules depend on numerous atoms and therefore the number of their coordinates in our 3D space. The searching for their transition states will inevitably encounter the curse of dimensionality, i.e. the reaction coordinate problem, which invokes the invention of various algorithms for solution. Recent years, new machine learning techniques and the incorporation of some of them into the transition state searching methods emerged. Here, we first review the design principle of representative transition state searching algorithms, including the collective-variable (CV)-dependent gentlest ascent dynamics, finite temperature string, fast tomographic, travelling-salesman based automated path searching, and the CV-independent transition path sampling. Then, we focus on the new version of TPS that incorporates reinforcement learning for efficient sampling, and we also clarify the suitable situation for its application. Finally, we propose a new paradigm for transition state searching, a new dimensionality reduction technique that preserves transition state information and combines gentlest ascent dynamics.
-
Keywords:
- transition state /
- gentlest ascent dynamics /
- path methods /
- reinforcement learning /
- generative models
[1] Edman L, Földes-Papp Z, Wennmalm S, Rigler R 1999 Chem. Phys. 247 11
Google Scholar
[2] Evenäs J, Malmendal A, Thulin E, Carlstrӧm G, Forsén S 1998 Biochemistry 37 13744
Google Scholar
[3] Hanson J A, Duderstadt K, Watkins L P, Bhattacharyya S, Brokaw J B, Chu J W, Yang H 2007 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104 18055
Google Scholar
[4] Moffat K 1989 Annu. Rev. Biophys. Chem. 18 309
Google Scholar
[5] Huang C, Kalodimos C G 2017 Annu. Rev. Biophys. 46 317
Google Scholar
[6] Weissenberger G, Henderikx R J M, Peters P J 2021 Nat. Methods 18 463
Google Scholar
[7] Clegg R M 1995 Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 6 103
Google Scholar
[8] Karplus M, McCammon J A 2002 Nat. Struct. Biol. 9 646
Google Scholar
[9] Hollingsworth S A, Dror R O 2018 Neuron 99 1129
Google Scholar
[10] Bernèche S, Roux B 2001 Nature 414 73
Google Scholar
[11] Khafizov K, Perez C, Koshy C, Quick M, Fendler K, Ziegler C, Forrest L R 2012 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109 E3035
Google Scholar
[12] Li J, Shaikh S A, Enkavi G, Wen P C, Huang Z, Tajkhorshid E 2013 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110 7696
Google Scholar
[13] Dror, R O, Green H F, Valant C, Borhani D W, Valcourt J R, Pan A C, Arlow D H, Canals M, Lane J R, Rahmani R, Baell J B, Sexton P M, Christopoulos A, Shaw D E 2013 Nature 503 295
Google Scholar
[14] Wacker D, Stevens R C, Roth B L 2017 a Cell 170 414
Google Scholar
[15] Wacker D, Wang S, McCorvy J D, Betz R M, Venkatakrishnan A J, Levit A, Lansu K, Schools Z L, Che T, Nichols D E, Dror R O, Roth B L 2017 Cell 168 377
Google Scholar
[16] McCorvy J D, Butler K V, Kelly B, Rechsteiner K, Karpiak J, Betz R M, Kormos B L, Shoichet B K, Dror R O, Jin J, Roth B L 2018 Nat. Chem. Biol. 14 126
Google Scholar
[17] Provasi D, Artacho M C, Negri A, Mobarec J C, Filizola M 2011 PLoS Comput. Biol. 7 e1002193
Google Scholar
[18] Cordero-Morales J F, Jogini V, Lewis A, Vásquez V, Cortes D M, Roux B, Perozo E 2007 Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14 1062
Google Scholar
[19] Fields J B, Németh-Cahalan K L, Freites J A, Vorontsova I, Hall J E, Tobias D J 2017 J. Biol. Chem. 292 185
Google Scholar
[20] Groban E S, Narayanan A, Jacobson M P 2006 PLoS Comput. Biol. 2 e32
Google Scholar
[21] Liu Y, Ke M, Gong H 2015 Biophys. J. 109 542
Google Scholar
[22] Delemotte L, Tarek M, Klein M L, Amaral C, Treptow W 2011 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 6109
Google Scholar
[23] Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Dror R O, Shaw D E 2011 Science 334 517
Google Scholar
[24] Snow C D, Nguyen H, Pande V S, Gruebele M 2002 Nature 420 102
Google Scholar
[25] Dror R O, Arlow D H, Maragakis P, Mildorf T J, Pan A C, Xu H, Borhani D W, Shaw D E 2011 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 18684
Google Scholar
[26] Dror R O, Pan A C, Arlow D H, Borhani D W, Maragakis P, Shan Y, Xu H, Shaw D E 2011 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 13118
Google Scholar
[27] Gu Y, Shrivastava I H, Amara S G, Bahar I 2009 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106 2589
Google Scholar
[28] Latorraca N R, Fastman N M, Venkatakrishnan A J, Frommer W B, Dror R O, Feng L 2017 Cell 169 96
Google Scholar
[29] Stelzl L S, Fowler P W, Sansom M S, Beckstein O 2014 J. Mol. Biol. 426 735
Google Scholar
[30] Buch I, Giorgino T, De Fabritiis G 2011 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 10184
Google Scholar
[31] Liang R, Swanson J M J, Madsen J J, Hong M, DeGrado W F, Voth G A 2016 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113 E6955
Google Scholar
[32] Suomivuori C M, Gamiz-Hernandez A P, Sundholm D, Kaila V R I 2017 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114 7043
Google Scholar
[33] Tajkhorshid E, Nollert P, Jensen M Ø, Miercke L J W, O’Connell J, Stroud R M, Schulten K 2002 Science 296 525
Google Scholar
[34] Watanabe A, Choe S, Chaptal V, Rosenberg J M, Wright E M, Grabe M, Abramson J 2010 Nature 468 988
Google Scholar
[35] Dedmon M M, Lindorff-Larsen K, Christodoulou J, Vendruscolo M, Dobson C M 2005 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 476
Google Scholar
[36] Nguyen H D, Hall C K 2004 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101 16180
Google Scholar
[37] Levitt M 1983 J. Mol. Biol. 168 595
Google Scholar
[38] Sugita Y, Okamoto Y 1999 Chem. Phys. Lett. 314 141
Google Scholar
[39] Rhee Y M, Pande V S 2003 Biophys. J. 84 775
Google Scholar
[40] Zhang W, Wu C, Duan Y 2005 J. Chem. Phys. 123 154105
Google Scholar
[41] Zhou R 2006 Protein Folding Protocols (Humana Totowa, NJ: Springer) pp205−223
[42] Sindhikara D, Meng Y, Roitberg A E 2008 J. Chem. Phys. 128 024103
Google Scholar
[43] Buchete N V, Hummer G 2008 Phys. Rev. E 77 030902
Google Scholar
[44] Rosta E, Hummer G 2009 J. Chem. Phys. 131 165102
Google Scholar
[45] Stelzl L S, Hummer G 2017 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13 3927
Google Scholar
[46] Yang L J, Gao Q Y 2009 J. Chem. Phys. 131 214109
Google Scholar
[47] Yang L, Liu C W, Shao Q, Zhang J, Gao Y Q 2015 Acc. Chem. Res. 48 947
Google Scholar
[48] Yang Y I, Zhang J, Che X, Yang L J, Gao Y Q 2016 J. Chem. Phys. 144 094105
Google Scholar
[49] Yang Y I, Shao Q, Zhang J, Yang L J, Gao Y Q 2019 J. Chem. Phys. 151 070902
Google Scholar
[50] Huber T, Torda A E, Van Gunsteren W F 1994 J. Comput. -Aided Mol. Des. 8 695
Google Scholar
[51] Wada T, Kuroda K, Yoshida Y, Ogasawara K, Ogawa A, Endo S 2006 Neurosurg. Rev. 29 242
Google Scholar
[52] Hansen H S, Hünenberger P H 2010 J. Comput. Chem. 31 1
Google Scholar
[53] Perić-Hassler L, Hansen H S, Baron R, Hünenberger P H 2010 Carbohydr. Res. 345 1781
Google Scholar
[54] Grubmüller H 1995 Phys. Rev. E 52 2893
Google Scholar
[55] Schulze B G, Grubmüller H, Evanseck J D 2000 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122 8700
Google Scholar
[56] Bouvier B, Grubmüller H 2007 Biophys. J. 93 770
Google Scholar
[57] Barducci A, Bonomi M, Parrinello M 2011 WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 1 826
Google Scholar
[58] Tiwary P, Parrinello M 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 230602
Google Scholar
[59] Bussi G, Laio A 2020 Nat. Rev. Phys. 2 200
Google Scholar
[60] Miao Y, Feher V A, McCammon J A 2015 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11 3584
Google Scholar
[61] Miao Y, McCammon J A 2017 Annu. Rep. Comput. Chem. 13 231
Google Scholar
[62] Wang J, Arantes P R, Bhattarai A, et al. 2021 Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci. 11 e1521
Google Scholar
[63] Naritomi Y, Sotaro F 2011 J. Chem. Phys. 134 065101
Google Scholar
[64] Schwantes C R, Vijay S P 2013 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9 2000
Google Scholar
[65] Perez-Hernandez G, Paul F, Giorgino T, Fabritiis G D, Noé F 2013 J. Chem. Phys. 139 015102
Google Scholar
[66] Bowman G R, Huang X H, Pande V S 2009 Methods 49 197
Google Scholar
[67] Metzner P, Noé F, Schütte C 2009 Phys. Rev. E 80 021106
Google Scholar
[68] Pande V S, Beauchamp K A, Bowman G R 2010 Methods 52 99
Google Scholar
[69] Prinz J H, Wu H, Sarich M, Keller B, Senne M, Held M, Chodera J D, Schütte C, Noé F 2011 J. Chem. Phys. 134 174105
Google Scholar
[70] Kellogg E H, Lange O F, Baker D 2012 J. Phys. Chem. B 116 11405
Google Scholar
[71] Yao Y, Cui R Z, Bowman G R, Silva D A, Sun J, Huang X H 2013 J. Chem. Phys. 138 174106
Google Scholar
[72] McGibbon R T, Schwantes C R, Pande V S 2014 J. Phys. Chem. B 118 6475
Google Scholar
[73] Nuske F, Keller B G, Pérez-Hernández G, Mey A S J, Noé F 2014 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10 1739
Google Scholar
[74] Sheong F K, Silva D A, Meng L, Zhao Y, Huang X H 2015 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11 17
Google Scholar
[75] Zhu L Z, Sheong F K, Zeng X, Huang X H 2016 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 30228
Google Scholar
[76] Wang W, Cao S, Zhu L Z, Huang X H 2018 WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 8 e1343
Google Scholar
[77] Husic B E, Pande V S 2018 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 2386
Google Scholar
[78] Konovalov K A, Unarta I C, Cao S, Goonetilleke E C, Huang X H 2021 J. Am. Chem. Soc. Au. 1 1330
Google Scholar
[79] E W, Zhou X 2011 Nonlinearity 24 1831
Google Scholar
[80] Samanta A, Chen M, Yu T Q, Tuckerman M E 2014 J. Chem. Phys. 140 164109
Google Scholar
[81] Chen M, Yu T Q, Tuckerman M E 2015 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112 3235
Google Scholar
[82] E W, Ren W, Vanden-Eijnden E 2002 Phys. Rev. B 66 052301
Google Scholar
[83] E W, Ren W, Vanden-Eijnden E 2005 J. Phys. Chem. B 109 6688
Google Scholar
[84] Maragliano L, Fischer A, Vanden-Eijnden E, Ciccotti G 2006 J. Chem. Phys. 125 024106
Google Scholar
[85] Ren W, Vanden-Eijnden E 2007 J. Chem. Phys. 126 164103
Google Scholar
[86] Maragliano L, Vanden-Eijnden E 2007 Chem. Phys. Lett. 446 182
Google Scholar
[87] Pan A C, Sezer D, Roux B 2008 J. Phys. Chem. B 112 3432
Google Scholar
[88] Chen C, Huang Y, Xiao Y 2012 Phys. Rev. E 86 031901
Google Scholar
[89] Chen C, Huang Y, Ji X, Xiao Y 2013 J. Chem. Phys. 138 164122
Google Scholar
[90] Chen C J, Huang Y Z, Jiang X W, Xiao Y 2014 J. Chem. Phys. 141 154109
Google Scholar
[91] Zhu L Z, Sheong F K, Cao S, Liu S, Unarta I C, Huang X H 2019 J. Chem. Phys. 150 124105
Google Scholar
[92] Xi K, Hu Z, Wu Q, Wei M, Qian R, Zhu L Z 2021 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17 5301
Google Scholar
[93] Wang L, Xi K, Zhu L Z, Da L T 2022 J. Chem. Inf. Model. 62 3213
Google Scholar
[94] Xi K, Zhu L Z 2022 Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23 14628
Google Scholar
[95] Xi K, Zhu L Z 2023 A Practical Guide to Recent Advances in Multiscale Modeling and Simulation of Biomolecules (AIP Publishing) pp9-1−9-24
[96] Vanden-Eijnden E 2006 Computer Simulations in Condensed Matter: From Materials to Chemical Biology (Berlin: Springer) pp453−493
[97] Vanden-Eijnden E 2010 Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 61 391
Google Scholar
[98] Dellago C, Bolhuis P G, Csajka F S, Chandler D 1998 J. Chem. Phys. 108 1964
Google Scholar
[99] Bolhuis P G, Dellago C, Chandler D 1998 Faraday Discuss. 110 421
Google Scholar
[100] Dellago C, Bolhuis P G, Chandler D 1999 J. Chem. Phys. 110 6617
Google Scholar
[101] Dellago C, Bolhuis P G, Geissler P L 2002 Adv. Chem. Phys. 123 1
Google Scholar
[102] Noé F, Tkatchenko A, Müller K R, Clementi C 2020 Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 71 361
Google Scholar
[103] AlQuraishi M, Sorger P K 2021 Nat. Methods 18 1169
Google Scholar
[104] Karniadakis G E, Kevrekidis I G, Lu L, Perdikaris P, Wang S, Yang L 2021 Nat. Rev. Phys. 3 422
Google Scholar
[105] Ju F, Zhu J, Shao B, Kong L, Liu T Y, Zheng W M, Bu D 2021 Nat. Commum. 12 2535
Google Scholar
[106] Huang B, Xu Y, Hu X H, Liu Y R, Liao S H, Zhang J H, Huang C D, Hong J J, Chen Q, Liu H Y 2022 Nature 602 523
Google Scholar
[107] Du Z, Su H, Wang W, Ye L, Wei H, Peng Z, Anishchenko I, Baker D, Yang J 2021 Nat. Prot. 16 5634
Google Scholar
[108] Dai M, Dong Z, Xu K, Zhang Q C 2023 J. Mol. Biol. 435 168059
Google Scholar
[109] Yuan Q M, Chen J W, Zhao H Y, Zhou Y Q, Yang Y D 2022 Bioinformatics 38 125
Google Scholar
[110] Su M Y, Feng G, Liu Z, Li Y, Wang R 2020 J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60 1122
Google Scholar
[111] Zeng C, Jian Y, Vosoughi S, Zeng C, Zhao Y 2023 Nat. Commum. 14 1060
Google Scholar
[112] Noé F, Olsson S, Köhler J, Wu H 2019 Science 365 6457
Google Scholar
[113] Jung H, Covino R, Arjun A, Leitold C, Dellago C, Bolhuis P G, Hummer G 2023 Nat. Comput. Sci. 3 334
Google Scholar
[114] Weiss D R, Levitt M 2009 J. Mol. Biol. 385 665
Google Scholar
[115] Isralewitz B, Gao M, Schulten K 2001 Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11 224
Google Scholar
[116] Schlitter J, Engels M, Krüger P 1994 J. Mol. Graph. 12 84
Google Scholar
[117] Torrie G M, Valleau J P 1977 J. Comput. Phys. 23 187
Google Scholar
[118] Ryckaert J P, Ciccotti G, Berendsen H J 1977 J. Comput. Phys. 23 327
Google Scholar
[119] Babin V, Roland C, Sagui C 2008 J. Chem. Phys. 128 134101
Google Scholar
[120] Branduardi D, Gervasio F L, Parrinello M 2007 J. Chem. Phys. 126 054103
Google Scholar
[121] Applegate D L, Bixby R E, Chvátal V, Cook W J 2011 The Traveling Salesman Problem: A Computational Study (Princeton University Press) pp1−58
[122] Cox M A A, Cox T F 2008 Handbook of Data Visualization (Berlin: Springer) pp315−347
[123] Barducci A, Bussi G, Parrinello M 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 020603
Google Scholar
[124] Fischmann T O, Smith C K, Mayhood T W, Myers J E, Reichert J P, Mannarino A, Carr D, Zhu H, Wong J, Yang R S, Le H V, Madison V S 2009 Biochemistry 48 2661
Google Scholar
[125] Hanrahan A J, Sylvester B E, Chang M T, et al. 2020 Cancer Res. 80 4233
Google Scholar
[126] Schmidt M, Lipson H 2009 Science 324 81
Google Scholar
[127] Jung H, Okazaki K, Hummer G 2017 J. Chem. Phys. 147 152716
Google Scholar
[128] Swenson D W H, Prinz J H, Noe F, Chodera J D, Bolhuis P G 2019 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15 813
Google Scholar
[129] Swenson D W H, Prinz J H, Noe F, Chodera J D, Bolhuis P G 2019 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15 837
Google Scholar
[130] Glielmo A, Husic B E, Rodriguez A, Clementi C, Noé F, Laio A 2021 Chem. Rev. 121 9722
Google Scholar
-
图 1 (a)依赖集合变量的过渡态搜索示意图, 需由生物分子(以丙戊酸二肽为例)体系所在的高维相空间(phase space)选取少量集合变量CV强行“定向降维”, 后在此低维CV空间利用非路径类方法或路径方法, 找到过渡态(Transition State), 并给出微观机制解释(mechanism interpretation); (b)非路径类的GAD算法原理示意图; (c), (d)两类路径类搜索算法原理示意图
Figure 1. (a) Illustration of the flow-chart of the collective variables (CVs) based transition state searching. A low dimensional space must be constructed with the CVs, which are arbitrary a priori guess about the mechanism. The transition state(s) is then determined by either the non-path or path methods. (b) The non-path method GAD. Path methods of (c) finite temperature string and (d) fast tomographic.
图 2 (a) PCV构建[120]和TAPS Method[91–95,121]算法原理示意图; (b)基于伞形采样方法得到的TAPS算法确定的MEK1由Loop-Out到达Loop-In转变过程最小自由能路径(MFEP)的自由能图景及相应的微观转变机制[92]
Figure 2. (a) Illustration for the construction of PCV and the flow-chart of the TAPS method; (b) TAPS revealed the free energy landscape and the transition states for the transition from the Loop-Out state of MEK1 to its Loop-In state[92].
图 3 路径采样算法的基本原理示意图 (a)路径采样中生成新相空间路径的shooting move; (b)传统过渡路径采样(左侧)的随机蒙特卡罗采样与过渡态分析原理[98–101], 融合强化学习的路径采样(右侧)在学习过程中不断促进采样起始点选择向过渡态集中[113]
Figure 3. Schematics of path sampling methods. (a) Shooting move: select a phase space point on the current path, make a small perturbation to this point (redraw random initial velocities) and perform a set of simulations. (b) Path sampling is built upon the committor probability $ {p}_{{\mathrm{B}}} $. The traditional transition path sampling (left)[98–101] selects shooting points randomly and uses Monte Carlo for sampling; the transition state is characterized through post-analysis: choosing the CVs with the highest and narrowest distribution of P(TP|CV); the new reinforcement path sampling (right)[113] chooses shooting points adaptively and directly learns the committor probability $ {p}_{{\mathrm{B}}} $ with maximized P(TP|x). Symbolic regression of $ {p}_{{\mathrm{B}}} $ is used for mechanism interpretation.
图 4 物理化学家需要怎样的降维算法 (a)现有降维算法范式不保留过渡态信息, 不利于机制解析; (b)可能的替代范式, 基于生成模型研发可保留过渡态信息的可逆降维算法, 并与低维空间搜索过渡态的GAD联用
Figure 4. Requirements on dimensionality reduction algorithms by physical chemists. (a) Current paradigm for dimensionality reduction and the main difficulties for the transition state searching. (b) Proposed alternative paradigm for transition state searching: combine dimensionality reduction that preserves transition state information with GAD.
表 1 主要过渡态搜索算法的总结分类
Table 1. Classification of the algorithms for transition state searching.
过渡态搜索算法分类 代表性算法 参考文献 备注 传统方法 依赖CV Gentlest ascent dynamics (GAD) [79—81] 非路径方法 Finite temperature string [82—87]
路径方法预设低维 Fast tomographic [88—90] 空间搜索 基于旅行商的路径搜索 TAPS [91—95] 融合AI 不依赖CV
高维空间搜索Transition path sampling [98—101] Reinforcement path sampling [113] 保留过渡态
信息的降维
低维空间搜索融合生成模型及GAD
的过渡态搜索(待研发)无 非路径方法 -
[1] Edman L, Földes-Papp Z, Wennmalm S, Rigler R 1999 Chem. Phys. 247 11
Google Scholar
[2] Evenäs J, Malmendal A, Thulin E, Carlstrӧm G, Forsén S 1998 Biochemistry 37 13744
Google Scholar
[3] Hanson J A, Duderstadt K, Watkins L P, Bhattacharyya S, Brokaw J B, Chu J W, Yang H 2007 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104 18055
Google Scholar
[4] Moffat K 1989 Annu. Rev. Biophys. Chem. 18 309
Google Scholar
[5] Huang C, Kalodimos C G 2017 Annu. Rev. Biophys. 46 317
Google Scholar
[6] Weissenberger G, Henderikx R J M, Peters P J 2021 Nat. Methods 18 463
Google Scholar
[7] Clegg R M 1995 Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 6 103
Google Scholar
[8] Karplus M, McCammon J A 2002 Nat. Struct. Biol. 9 646
Google Scholar
[9] Hollingsworth S A, Dror R O 2018 Neuron 99 1129
Google Scholar
[10] Bernèche S, Roux B 2001 Nature 414 73
Google Scholar
[11] Khafizov K, Perez C, Koshy C, Quick M, Fendler K, Ziegler C, Forrest L R 2012 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109 E3035
Google Scholar
[12] Li J, Shaikh S A, Enkavi G, Wen P C, Huang Z, Tajkhorshid E 2013 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110 7696
Google Scholar
[13] Dror, R O, Green H F, Valant C, Borhani D W, Valcourt J R, Pan A C, Arlow D H, Canals M, Lane J R, Rahmani R, Baell J B, Sexton P M, Christopoulos A, Shaw D E 2013 Nature 503 295
Google Scholar
[14] Wacker D, Stevens R C, Roth B L 2017 a Cell 170 414
Google Scholar
[15] Wacker D, Wang S, McCorvy J D, Betz R M, Venkatakrishnan A J, Levit A, Lansu K, Schools Z L, Che T, Nichols D E, Dror R O, Roth B L 2017 Cell 168 377
Google Scholar
[16] McCorvy J D, Butler K V, Kelly B, Rechsteiner K, Karpiak J, Betz R M, Kormos B L, Shoichet B K, Dror R O, Jin J, Roth B L 2018 Nat. Chem. Biol. 14 126
Google Scholar
[17] Provasi D, Artacho M C, Negri A, Mobarec J C, Filizola M 2011 PLoS Comput. Biol. 7 e1002193
Google Scholar
[18] Cordero-Morales J F, Jogini V, Lewis A, Vásquez V, Cortes D M, Roux B, Perozo E 2007 Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14 1062
Google Scholar
[19] Fields J B, Németh-Cahalan K L, Freites J A, Vorontsova I, Hall J E, Tobias D J 2017 J. Biol. Chem. 292 185
Google Scholar
[20] Groban E S, Narayanan A, Jacobson M P 2006 PLoS Comput. Biol. 2 e32
Google Scholar
[21] Liu Y, Ke M, Gong H 2015 Biophys. J. 109 542
Google Scholar
[22] Delemotte L, Tarek M, Klein M L, Amaral C, Treptow W 2011 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 6109
Google Scholar
[23] Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Dror R O, Shaw D E 2011 Science 334 517
Google Scholar
[24] Snow C D, Nguyen H, Pande V S, Gruebele M 2002 Nature 420 102
Google Scholar
[25] Dror R O, Arlow D H, Maragakis P, Mildorf T J, Pan A C, Xu H, Borhani D W, Shaw D E 2011 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 18684
Google Scholar
[26] Dror R O, Pan A C, Arlow D H, Borhani D W, Maragakis P, Shan Y, Xu H, Shaw D E 2011 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 13118
Google Scholar
[27] Gu Y, Shrivastava I H, Amara S G, Bahar I 2009 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106 2589
Google Scholar
[28] Latorraca N R, Fastman N M, Venkatakrishnan A J, Frommer W B, Dror R O, Feng L 2017 Cell 169 96
Google Scholar
[29] Stelzl L S, Fowler P W, Sansom M S, Beckstein O 2014 J. Mol. Biol. 426 735
Google Scholar
[30] Buch I, Giorgino T, De Fabritiis G 2011 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 10184
Google Scholar
[31] Liang R, Swanson J M J, Madsen J J, Hong M, DeGrado W F, Voth G A 2016 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113 E6955
Google Scholar
[32] Suomivuori C M, Gamiz-Hernandez A P, Sundholm D, Kaila V R I 2017 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114 7043
Google Scholar
[33] Tajkhorshid E, Nollert P, Jensen M Ø, Miercke L J W, O’Connell J, Stroud R M, Schulten K 2002 Science 296 525
Google Scholar
[34] Watanabe A, Choe S, Chaptal V, Rosenberg J M, Wright E M, Grabe M, Abramson J 2010 Nature 468 988
Google Scholar
[35] Dedmon M M, Lindorff-Larsen K, Christodoulou J, Vendruscolo M, Dobson C M 2005 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 476
Google Scholar
[36] Nguyen H D, Hall C K 2004 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101 16180
Google Scholar
[37] Levitt M 1983 J. Mol. Biol. 168 595
Google Scholar
[38] Sugita Y, Okamoto Y 1999 Chem. Phys. Lett. 314 141
Google Scholar
[39] Rhee Y M, Pande V S 2003 Biophys. J. 84 775
Google Scholar
[40] Zhang W, Wu C, Duan Y 2005 J. Chem. Phys. 123 154105
Google Scholar
[41] Zhou R 2006 Protein Folding Protocols (Humana Totowa, NJ: Springer) pp205−223
[42] Sindhikara D, Meng Y, Roitberg A E 2008 J. Chem. Phys. 128 024103
Google Scholar
[43] Buchete N V, Hummer G 2008 Phys. Rev. E 77 030902
Google Scholar
[44] Rosta E, Hummer G 2009 J. Chem. Phys. 131 165102
Google Scholar
[45] Stelzl L S, Hummer G 2017 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13 3927
Google Scholar
[46] Yang L J, Gao Q Y 2009 J. Chem. Phys. 131 214109
Google Scholar
[47] Yang L, Liu C W, Shao Q, Zhang J, Gao Y Q 2015 Acc. Chem. Res. 48 947
Google Scholar
[48] Yang Y I, Zhang J, Che X, Yang L J, Gao Y Q 2016 J. Chem. Phys. 144 094105
Google Scholar
[49] Yang Y I, Shao Q, Zhang J, Yang L J, Gao Y Q 2019 J. Chem. Phys. 151 070902
Google Scholar
[50] Huber T, Torda A E, Van Gunsteren W F 1994 J. Comput. -Aided Mol. Des. 8 695
Google Scholar
[51] Wada T, Kuroda K, Yoshida Y, Ogasawara K, Ogawa A, Endo S 2006 Neurosurg. Rev. 29 242
Google Scholar
[52] Hansen H S, Hünenberger P H 2010 J. Comput. Chem. 31 1
Google Scholar
[53] Perić-Hassler L, Hansen H S, Baron R, Hünenberger P H 2010 Carbohydr. Res. 345 1781
Google Scholar
[54] Grubmüller H 1995 Phys. Rev. E 52 2893
Google Scholar
[55] Schulze B G, Grubmüller H, Evanseck J D 2000 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122 8700
Google Scholar
[56] Bouvier B, Grubmüller H 2007 Biophys. J. 93 770
Google Scholar
[57] Barducci A, Bonomi M, Parrinello M 2011 WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 1 826
Google Scholar
[58] Tiwary P, Parrinello M 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 230602
Google Scholar
[59] Bussi G, Laio A 2020 Nat. Rev. Phys. 2 200
Google Scholar
[60] Miao Y, Feher V A, McCammon J A 2015 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11 3584
Google Scholar
[61] Miao Y, McCammon J A 2017 Annu. Rep. Comput. Chem. 13 231
Google Scholar
[62] Wang J, Arantes P R, Bhattarai A, et al. 2021 Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci. 11 e1521
Google Scholar
[63] Naritomi Y, Sotaro F 2011 J. Chem. Phys. 134 065101
Google Scholar
[64] Schwantes C R, Vijay S P 2013 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9 2000
Google Scholar
[65] Perez-Hernandez G, Paul F, Giorgino T, Fabritiis G D, Noé F 2013 J. Chem. Phys. 139 015102
Google Scholar
[66] Bowman G R, Huang X H, Pande V S 2009 Methods 49 197
Google Scholar
[67] Metzner P, Noé F, Schütte C 2009 Phys. Rev. E 80 021106
Google Scholar
[68] Pande V S, Beauchamp K A, Bowman G R 2010 Methods 52 99
Google Scholar
[69] Prinz J H, Wu H, Sarich M, Keller B, Senne M, Held M, Chodera J D, Schütte C, Noé F 2011 J. Chem. Phys. 134 174105
Google Scholar
[70] Kellogg E H, Lange O F, Baker D 2012 J. Phys. Chem. B 116 11405
Google Scholar
[71] Yao Y, Cui R Z, Bowman G R, Silva D A, Sun J, Huang X H 2013 J. Chem. Phys. 138 174106
Google Scholar
[72] McGibbon R T, Schwantes C R, Pande V S 2014 J. Phys. Chem. B 118 6475
Google Scholar
[73] Nuske F, Keller B G, Pérez-Hernández G, Mey A S J, Noé F 2014 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10 1739
Google Scholar
[74] Sheong F K, Silva D A, Meng L, Zhao Y, Huang X H 2015 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11 17
Google Scholar
[75] Zhu L Z, Sheong F K, Zeng X, Huang X H 2016 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 30228
Google Scholar
[76] Wang W, Cao S, Zhu L Z, Huang X H 2018 WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 8 e1343
Google Scholar
[77] Husic B E, Pande V S 2018 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 2386
Google Scholar
[78] Konovalov K A, Unarta I C, Cao S, Goonetilleke E C, Huang X H 2021 J. Am. Chem. Soc. Au. 1 1330
Google Scholar
[79] E W, Zhou X 2011 Nonlinearity 24 1831
Google Scholar
[80] Samanta A, Chen M, Yu T Q, Tuckerman M E 2014 J. Chem. Phys. 140 164109
Google Scholar
[81] Chen M, Yu T Q, Tuckerman M E 2015 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112 3235
Google Scholar
[82] E W, Ren W, Vanden-Eijnden E 2002 Phys. Rev. B 66 052301
Google Scholar
[83] E W, Ren W, Vanden-Eijnden E 2005 J. Phys. Chem. B 109 6688
Google Scholar
[84] Maragliano L, Fischer A, Vanden-Eijnden E, Ciccotti G 2006 J. Chem. Phys. 125 024106
Google Scholar
[85] Ren W, Vanden-Eijnden E 2007 J. Chem. Phys. 126 164103
Google Scholar
[86] Maragliano L, Vanden-Eijnden E 2007 Chem. Phys. Lett. 446 182
Google Scholar
[87] Pan A C, Sezer D, Roux B 2008 J. Phys. Chem. B 112 3432
Google Scholar
[88] Chen C, Huang Y, Xiao Y 2012 Phys. Rev. E 86 031901
Google Scholar
[89] Chen C, Huang Y, Ji X, Xiao Y 2013 J. Chem. Phys. 138 164122
Google Scholar
[90] Chen C J, Huang Y Z, Jiang X W, Xiao Y 2014 J. Chem. Phys. 141 154109
Google Scholar
[91] Zhu L Z, Sheong F K, Cao S, Liu S, Unarta I C, Huang X H 2019 J. Chem. Phys. 150 124105
Google Scholar
[92] Xi K, Hu Z, Wu Q, Wei M, Qian R, Zhu L Z 2021 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17 5301
Google Scholar
[93] Wang L, Xi K, Zhu L Z, Da L T 2022 J. Chem. Inf. Model. 62 3213
Google Scholar
[94] Xi K, Zhu L Z 2022 Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23 14628
Google Scholar
[95] Xi K, Zhu L Z 2023 A Practical Guide to Recent Advances in Multiscale Modeling and Simulation of Biomolecules (AIP Publishing) pp9-1−9-24
[96] Vanden-Eijnden E 2006 Computer Simulations in Condensed Matter: From Materials to Chemical Biology (Berlin: Springer) pp453−493
[97] Vanden-Eijnden E 2010 Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 61 391
Google Scholar
[98] Dellago C, Bolhuis P G, Csajka F S, Chandler D 1998 J. Chem. Phys. 108 1964
Google Scholar
[99] Bolhuis P G, Dellago C, Chandler D 1998 Faraday Discuss. 110 421
Google Scholar
[100] Dellago C, Bolhuis P G, Chandler D 1999 J. Chem. Phys. 110 6617
Google Scholar
[101] Dellago C, Bolhuis P G, Geissler P L 2002 Adv. Chem. Phys. 123 1
Google Scholar
[102] Noé F, Tkatchenko A, Müller K R, Clementi C 2020 Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 71 361
Google Scholar
[103] AlQuraishi M, Sorger P K 2021 Nat. Methods 18 1169
Google Scholar
[104] Karniadakis G E, Kevrekidis I G, Lu L, Perdikaris P, Wang S, Yang L 2021 Nat. Rev. Phys. 3 422
Google Scholar
[105] Ju F, Zhu J, Shao B, Kong L, Liu T Y, Zheng W M, Bu D 2021 Nat. Commum. 12 2535
Google Scholar
[106] Huang B, Xu Y, Hu X H, Liu Y R, Liao S H, Zhang J H, Huang C D, Hong J J, Chen Q, Liu H Y 2022 Nature 602 523
Google Scholar
[107] Du Z, Su H, Wang W, Ye L, Wei H, Peng Z, Anishchenko I, Baker D, Yang J 2021 Nat. Prot. 16 5634
Google Scholar
[108] Dai M, Dong Z, Xu K, Zhang Q C 2023 J. Mol. Biol. 435 168059
Google Scholar
[109] Yuan Q M, Chen J W, Zhao H Y, Zhou Y Q, Yang Y D 2022 Bioinformatics 38 125
Google Scholar
[110] Su M Y, Feng G, Liu Z, Li Y, Wang R 2020 J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60 1122
Google Scholar
[111] Zeng C, Jian Y, Vosoughi S, Zeng C, Zhao Y 2023 Nat. Commum. 14 1060
Google Scholar
[112] Noé F, Olsson S, Köhler J, Wu H 2019 Science 365 6457
Google Scholar
[113] Jung H, Covino R, Arjun A, Leitold C, Dellago C, Bolhuis P G, Hummer G 2023 Nat. Comput. Sci. 3 334
Google Scholar
[114] Weiss D R, Levitt M 2009 J. Mol. Biol. 385 665
Google Scholar
[115] Isralewitz B, Gao M, Schulten K 2001 Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11 224
Google Scholar
[116] Schlitter J, Engels M, Krüger P 1994 J. Mol. Graph. 12 84
Google Scholar
[117] Torrie G M, Valleau J P 1977 J. Comput. Phys. 23 187
Google Scholar
[118] Ryckaert J P, Ciccotti G, Berendsen H J 1977 J. Comput. Phys. 23 327
Google Scholar
[119] Babin V, Roland C, Sagui C 2008 J. Chem. Phys. 128 134101
Google Scholar
[120] Branduardi D, Gervasio F L, Parrinello M 2007 J. Chem. Phys. 126 054103
Google Scholar
[121] Applegate D L, Bixby R E, Chvátal V, Cook W J 2011 The Traveling Salesman Problem: A Computational Study (Princeton University Press) pp1−58
[122] Cox M A A, Cox T F 2008 Handbook of Data Visualization (Berlin: Springer) pp315−347
[123] Barducci A, Bussi G, Parrinello M 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 020603
Google Scholar
[124] Fischmann T O, Smith C K, Mayhood T W, Myers J E, Reichert J P, Mannarino A, Carr D, Zhu H, Wong J, Yang R S, Le H V, Madison V S 2009 Biochemistry 48 2661
Google Scholar
[125] Hanrahan A J, Sylvester B E, Chang M T, et al. 2020 Cancer Res. 80 4233
Google Scholar
[126] Schmidt M, Lipson H 2009 Science 324 81
Google Scholar
[127] Jung H, Okazaki K, Hummer G 2017 J. Chem. Phys. 147 152716
Google Scholar
[128] Swenson D W H, Prinz J H, Noe F, Chodera J D, Bolhuis P G 2019 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15 813
Google Scholar
[129] Swenson D W H, Prinz J H, Noe F, Chodera J D, Bolhuis P G 2019 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15 837
Google Scholar
[130] Glielmo A, Husic B E, Rodriguez A, Clementi C, Noé F, Laio A 2021 Chem. Rev. 121 9722
Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 2540
- PDF Downloads: 189
- Cited By: 0