-
Dielectric breakdown at high electric field plays an important role in the application of ferroelectric ceramics. In this paper, the failure probability versus electric shock time of ferroelectric ceramics under positive pulse electric field is analyzed statistically. The failure probability distribution of ceramics after 10 electric shocks is studied. Piezoelectric constant, P-E loop of ferroelectric ceramics after 10 thousand electric shocks are measured and the breakdown mechanism is discussed. The results indicate that the relation between failure probability and electric shock number of ferroelectric ceramics is shown by a bath-tube curve and the failure probability of samples after 10 electric shocks decreases by 4 orders of magnitudes compared with that of origin sample. According to the results of piezoelectric constant and P-E loop, the samples subjected to positive pulse electric field many times do not show obvious fatigue or aging effect. So pulse electric field loading at 4.5 kV/mm is close to non-destructive condition. Considering the spread speed of cracks, it can be found that the rupture of ferroelectric ceramics under pulsed electric field roots from extension and connection of multi-cracks from multi-defects.
-
Keywords:
- ferroelectric ceramics /
- pulsed electric field /
- failure probability
[1] Zhang F P, Du J M, Liu Y S, He H L 2007 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 90 2639Google Scholar
[2] Setchell R E 2007 J. Appl. Phy. 101 053525Google Scholar
[3] Wang H, Singh R 1997 J. Appl. Phy. 81 7471Google Scholar
[4] 张福平, 杜金梅, 刘雨生, 刘艺, 刘高旻, 贺红亮 2011 物理学报 60 057701Google Scholar
Zhang F P, Du J M, Liu Y S, Liu Y, Liu G M, He H L 2011 Acta. Phys. Sin. 60 057701Google Scholar
[5] Cao H, Evans A G 1994 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77 1783Google Scholar
[6] White G S, Raynes A S, Vaudin M D, Freiman S W 1994 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77 2603Google Scholar
[7] Watanabe Y, Okano M, Masuda A 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 332Google Scholar
[8] Bourne N K, Rosenberg Z, Field J E 1995 J. Appl. Phy. 78 3736Google Scholar
[9] Heaton T H 1990 Phys. Earth Planet. In. 64 1Google Scholar
-
表 1 正向脉冲电场下铁电陶瓷加压次数与击穿概率统计表(共15000片)
Table 1. Statistic breakdown time with electric shock time of ferroelectric ceramic under pulse electric field (total 15000 pieces).
第几次加电压 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 击穿发生次数 293 11 5 4 6 2 3 3 3 1 击穿发生概率/‰ 19.5 0.7 0.3 0.27 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.067 表 2 铁电陶瓷经历10次脉冲高压老炼后的击穿电场 (kV/mm)
Table 2. Breakdown field strength of ferroelectric ceramics after 10 times pulsed electric shock (kV/mm).
编号 电场 编号 电场 编号 电场 编号 电场 编号 电场 编号 电场 编号 电场 编号 电场 编号 电场 编号 电场 1 8.80 2 8.55 3 8.35 4 8.30 5 8.85 6 8.90 7 8.85 8 8.50 9 8.90 10 8.85 11 8.35 12 8.80 13 8.90 14 8.50 15 8.90 16 8.75 17 8.80 18 8.15 19 8.65 20 8.80 21 8.30 22 8.85 23 8.75 24 8.45 25 8.90 26 8.85 27 8.30 28 8.75 29 8.75 30 8.85 31 8.80 32 8.75 33 8.75 34 8.95 35 8.95 36 8.85 37 9.00 38 8.90 39 8.30 40 10.2 41 8.70 42 8.85 43 9.00 44 8.95 45 8.85 46 8.60 47 8.70 48 8.80 49 8.95 50 8.85 51 8.50 52 8.70 53 8.90 54 8.55 55 8.85 56 8.50 57 8.90 58 8.85 59 8.95 60 7.90 61 8.40 62 8.90 63 8.75 64 8.85 65 8.85 66 8.95 67 8.60 68 8.85 69 8.85 70 8.30 71 8.80 72 8.75 73 8.95 74 8.80 75 8.80 76 8.85 77 8.95 78 8.65 79 8.95 80 8.80 81 8.50 82 8.55 83 8.90 84 8.90 85 8.45 86 8.40 87 8.65 88 8.80 89 8.80 90 8.05 91 8.50 92 8.65 93 8.85 94 8.60 95 8.95 96 8.90 97 8.65 98 8.90 99 7.80 100 8.75 表 3 经历10次脉冲高压合格的铁电陶瓷失效概率表
Table 3. Breakdown possibility of PZT 95/5 after 10 times pulsed electric shock.
Emean – 2σ Emean – 3σ Emean – 4σ Emean – 6σ 电场/
(kV·mm–1)8.07 7.79 7.5 6.93 击穿发生
概率/%4.6 0.3 0.01 10–6 -
[1] Zhang F P, Du J M, Liu Y S, He H L 2007 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 90 2639Google Scholar
[2] Setchell R E 2007 J. Appl. Phy. 101 053525Google Scholar
[3] Wang H, Singh R 1997 J. Appl. Phy. 81 7471Google Scholar
[4] 张福平, 杜金梅, 刘雨生, 刘艺, 刘高旻, 贺红亮 2011 物理学报 60 057701Google Scholar
Zhang F P, Du J M, Liu Y S, Liu Y, Liu G M, He H L 2011 Acta. Phys. Sin. 60 057701Google Scholar
[5] Cao H, Evans A G 1994 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77 1783Google Scholar
[6] White G S, Raynes A S, Vaudin M D, Freiman S W 1994 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77 2603Google Scholar
[7] Watanabe Y, Okano M, Masuda A 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 332Google Scholar
[8] Bourne N K, Rosenberg Z, Field J E 1995 J. Appl. Phy. 78 3736Google Scholar
[9] Heaton T H 1990 Phys. Earth Planet. In. 64 1Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 1764
- PDF Downloads: 38
- Cited By: 0