Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

First-principles study on effects of alloying elements Sn and Nb on phase stability of corrosion oxide films of zirconium alloys

Chen Tun Cui Jie-Chao Li Min Chen Wen Sun Zhi-Peng Fu Bao-Qin Hou Qing

Citation:

First-principles study on effects of alloying elements Sn and Nb on phase stability of corrosion oxide films of zirconium alloys

Chen Tun, Cui Jie-Chao, Li Min, Chen Wen, Sun Zhi-Peng, Fu Bao-Qin, Hou Qing
PDF
HTML
Get Citation
  • Water-side oxidative corrosion of zirconium alloy is a key problem in the design of nuclear fuel rods cladding materials in pressurised water reactors (PWRs), and its corrosion resistance is one of the main factors limiting service life. At present, Zr-Sn-Nb system alloys are still the main development direction of advanced zirconium alloys. Sn and Nb can exhibit a variety of valence states in the oxide film of the cladding and significantly affect the stability of ZrO2. However, the influence mechanism of Sn and Nb on the fraction of t-ZrO2 and the t-m phase transition is unclear. In this work, the lattice properties, formation enthalpies, and oxygen vacancy formation energy of ZrO2 under the doping conditions of Sn and Nb with different valence states are calculated based on the first-principles, and the influence mechanism of Sn and Nb on the stability of ZrO2 is revealed at an atomic scale. The results show that there is a significant difference between the effects of Sn and Nb, as well as between low-valent and high-valent elements. Sn2+ and Nb3+ cause lattice swelling to be significantly distorted , Nb5+ causes lattice to shrink, which contributes to reducing the stresses within the film, and Sn4+ leads the lattice to slightly swell. The low-valent elements all make ZrO2 less stable and are unfavourable for the stability of t-ZrO2 relative to m-ZrO2. The high-valent Nb5+and Sn4+ promote the relative stability of t-ZrO2, thus inhibiting the t-m phase transition, with Nb5+ having a significant effect and Sn4+ having a weak effect. The relative stability of t-ZrO2 increases with pressure rising in a range of 0–3.5 GPa. Compared with high-valent elements, the low-valent elements are favourable for introduing oxygen vacancies into t-ZrO2, thus stabilising the interfacial t-ZrO2 and enhancing the corrosion resistance of the cladding. By investigating the electronic structure, it is found that the oxygen vacancy formation energy is positively correlated with the magnitude of charge transfer (or degree of electron localisation) between the alloying element ion and the oxygen vacancy. These results contribute to optimizing the composition and designing the structure for corrosion resistance of zirconium alloys.
      Corresponding author: Fu Bao-Qin, bqfu@scu.edu.cn ; Hou Qing, qhou@scu.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the Science and Technology Program of Sichuan Province, China (Grant No. 2023NSFSC0044) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China.
    [1]

    Yuan R, Xie Y P, Li T, Xu C H, Yao M Y, Xu J X, Guo H B, Zhou B X 2021 Acta Mater. 209 116804Google Scholar

    [2]

    Kim T, Couet A, Kim S, Lee Y, Yoo S C, Kim J H 2020 Corros. Sci. 173 108745Google Scholar

    [3]

    Liu S M, Beyerlein I J, Han W Z 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 5766Google Scholar

    [4]

    Wei K J, Chen L, Qu Y, Zhang Y F, Jin X Y, Xue W B, Zhang J L 2018 Corros. Sci. 143 129Google Scholar

    [5]

    Zhou B F, Feng K Q 2018 RSC Adv. 8 26251Google Scholar

    [6]

    Bell B D C, Murphy S T, Burr P A, Comstock R J, Partezana J M, Grimes R W, Wenman M R 2016 Corros. Sci. 105 36Google Scholar

    [7]

    Nikulina A V 2004 Met. Sci. Heat Treat. 46 458Google Scholar

    [8]

    Ruiz-Hervias J, Simbruner K, Cristobal-Beneyto M, Perez-Gallego D, Zencker U 2021 J. Nucl. Mater. 544 152668Google Scholar

    [9]

    Zhang F L, Chai L J, Qi L, Wang Y Y, Wu L, Pan H C, Teng C Q, Murty K L 2023 J. Nucl. Mater. 577 154284Google Scholar

    [10]

    Qin W, Nam C, Li H L, Szpunar J A 2007 Acta Mater. 55 1695Google Scholar

    [11]

    Liao J J, Yang Z B, Qiu S Y, Peng Q, Li Z C, Zhang J S 2019 J. Nucl. Mater. 524 101Google Scholar

    [12]

    Motta A T, Couet A, Comstock R J 2015 Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 45 311Google Scholar

    [13]

    Hillner E, Franklin D G, Smee J D 2000 J. Nucl. Mater. 278 334Google Scholar

    [14]

    Couet A, Motta A T, Ambard A 2015 Corros. Sci. 100 73Google Scholar

    [15]

    Yilmazbayhan A, Motta A T, Comstock R J, Sabol G P, Lai B, Cai Z 2004 J. Nucl. Mater. 324 6Google Scholar

    [16]

    Massih A R, Vesterlund G 1992 Nucl. Eng. Des. 137 57Google Scholar

    [17]

    Motta A T 2011 JOM 63 59Google Scholar

    [18]

    Bouineau V, Bénier G, Pêcheur D, Thomazet J, Ambard A, Blat M 2010 Nucl. Technol. 170 444Google Scholar

    [19]

    Takagi I, Une K, Miyamura S, Kobayashi T 2011 J. Nucl. Mater. 419 339Google Scholar

    [20]

    Couet A, Borrel L, Liu J L, Hu J, Grovenor C 2019 Corros. Sci. 159 108134Google Scholar

    [21]

    Hu J, Garner A, Frankel P, Li M, Kirk M A, Lozano-Perez S, Preuss M, Grovenor C 2019 Acta Mater. 173 313Google Scholar

    [22]

    Liu J L, Yu H B, Karamched P, Hu J, He G Z, Goran D, Hughes G M, Wilkinson A J, Lozano-Perez S, Grovenor C R M 2019 Acta Mater. 179 328Google Scholar

    [23]

    Kurpaska L, Favergeon J, Lahoche L, Moulin G, Marssi M El, Roelandt J M 2013 Oxid. Met. 79 261Google Scholar

    [24]

    Xun G, Qingdong L, Wenqing L, Meiyi Y, Bangxin Z 2008 Rare Met. Mater. Eng. 37 1415Google Scholar

    [25]

    Beie H, Mitwalsky A, Garzarolli F, Ruhmann H, Sell H 1994 Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: Tenth International Symposium (West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International) pp615–643

    [26]

    Barberis P 1995 J. Nucl. Mater. 226 34Google Scholar

    [27]

    Polatidis E, Frankel P, Wei J, Klaus M, Comstock R J, Ambard A, Lyon S, Cottis R A, Preuss M 2013 J. Nucl. Mater. 432 102Google Scholar

    [28]

    Bouvier P, Godlewski J, Lucazeau G 2002 J. Nucl. Mater. 300 118Google Scholar

    [29]

    Preuss M, Frankel P, Polatidis E, Wei J, Smith J W, Wang C, Cottis R A, Lyon S B, Lozano-Perez S, Hudson D, Ni N, Grovenor C R M, Smith G D W, Sykes J, Cerezo A, Storer S, Fitzpatrick M E 2011 16th International Symposium on Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry Chengdu, China, May 9–13, 2010

    [30]

    Wei J, Frankel P, Polatidis E, Blat M, Ambard A, Comstock R J, Hallstadius L, Hudson D, Smith G D W, Grovenor C R M, Klaus M, Cottis R A, Lyon S, Preuss M 2013 Acta Mater. 61 4200Google Scholar

    [31]

    Garner A, Hu J, Harte A, Frankel P, Grovenor C, Lozano-Perez S, Preuss M 2015 Acta Mater. 99 259Google Scholar

    [32]

    Jeong Y H, Lee K O, Kim H G 2002 J. Nucl. Mater. 302 9Google Scholar

    [33]

    Jeong Y H, Kim H G, Kim T H 2003 J. Nucl. Mater. 317 1Google Scholar

    [34]

    Sakamoto K, Une K, Aomi M, Otsuka T, Hashizume K 2015 J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 52 1259Google Scholar

    [35]

    Liao J J, Xu F, Peng Q, Yang Z B, Li Z C, Qiu S Y 2020 J. Nucl. Mater. 528 151846Google Scholar

    [36]

    Froideval A, Degueldre C, Segre C U, Pouchon M A, Grolimund D 2008 Corros. Sci. 50 1313Google Scholar

    [37]

    Hulme H, Baxter F, Babu R P, Denecke M A, Gass M, Steuwer A, Norén K, Carlson S, Preuss M 2016 Corros. Sci. 105 202Google Scholar

    [38]

    Wu J W, Xie Y P, Yao M Y, Guan S H, Zhao Y, Pan R J, Wu L, Liu Z P 2023 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25 8934Google Scholar

    [39]

    Zhao X S, Shang S L, Liu Z K, Shen J Y 2011 J. Nucl. Mater. 415 13Google Scholar

    [40]

    赵毅, 王栋, 徐晨皓, 吴江桅, 王洋, 谢耀平 2021 上海金属 43 112Google Scholar

    Zhao Y, Wang D, Xu C H, Wu J W, Wang Y, Xie Y P 2021 Shanghai Met. 43 112Google Scholar

    [41]

    Kresse G, Hafner J 1993 Phys. Rev. B 47 558Google Scholar

    [42]

    Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Comput. Mater. Sci. 6 15Google Scholar

    [43]

    Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169Google Scholar

    [44]

    Blöchl P E 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 17953Google Scholar

    [45]

    Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 1396Google Scholar

    [46]

    Monkhorst H J, Pack J D 1976 Phys. Rev. B 13 5188Google Scholar

    [47]

    Methfessel M, Paxton A T 1989 Phys. Rev. B 40 3616Google Scholar

    [48]

    Barbour O, Crocombette J P, Schuler T, Tupin M 2020 J. Nucl. Mater. 539 152333Google Scholar

    [49]

    Zhang P, Lu Y, He C H, Zhang P 2011 J. Nucl. Mater. 418 143Google Scholar

    [50]

    Fukui H, Fujimoto M, Akahama Y, Sano-Furukawa A, Hattori T 2019 Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B Struct. Sci. Cryst. Eng. Mater. 75 742Google Scholar

    [51]

    Delaforce P M, Yeomans J A, Filkin N C, Wright G J, Thomson R C 2007 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 90 918Google Scholar

    [52]

    Torres F J, Amigó J M, Alarcón J 2003 J. Solid State Chem. 173 40Google Scholar

    [53]

    Lutterotti L, Scardi P 1990 J. Appl. Crystallogr. 23 246Google Scholar

    [54]

    Bouvier P, Djurado E, Lucazeau G, Le Bihan T 2000 Phys. Rev. B 62 8731Google Scholar

    [55]

    Bondars B, Heidemane G, Grabis J, Laschke K, Boysen H, Schneider J, Frey F 1995 J. Mater. Sci. 30 1621Google Scholar

    [56]

    Puchala B, der Ven A 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 94108Google Scholar

    [57]

    Fisher E S, Renken C J 1964 Phys. Rev. 135 A482Google Scholar

    [58]

    Anada H, Takeda K 1996 Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: Eleventh International Symposium (West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International) pp35–54

    [59]

    Wang C, Zinkevich M, Aldinger F 2004 Calphad 28 281Google Scholar

    [60]

    Chevalier P Y, Fischer E, Cheynet B 2004 Calphad 28 15Google Scholar

    [61]

    Schubert H, Frey F 2005 J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 25 1597Google Scholar

    [62]

    Becke A D, Edgecombe K E 1990 J. Chem. Phys. 92 5397Google Scholar

  • 图 1  锆(亚)氧化物的原胞(绿色小球代表Zr原子, 红色小球代表O原子) (a) m-ZrO2; (b) t-ZrO2; (c) h-ZrO

    Figure 1.  Unit cells of Zr (sub)oxides (green balls represented Zr atoms and red balls represented O atoms): (a) m-ZrO2; (b) t-ZrO2; (c) h-ZrO.

    图 2  纯ZrO2或25%, 6.25%浓度的Nb5+, Sn4+掺杂后ZrO2的$ {{\Delta }}E({\mathrm{O}}x, P) $随压力的变化

    Figure 2.  Dependence of $ {{\Delta }}E({\mathrm{O}}x, P) $ on pressure for pure ZrO2 or ZrO2 with 25% and 6.25% Nb5+ or Sn4+ doping.

    图 3  三维差分电荷密度(e/Bohr3)([001]方向观察得到, 蓝色等值面值为–0.008 e/Bohr3, 黄色等值面值为0.008 e/Bohr3) (a) t-ZrO2中Nb3+与1NN氧空位; (b) t-ZrO2中Nb5+与1NN氧空位; (c) t-ZrO2中Sn2+与1NN氧空位; (d) t-ZrO2中Sn4+与1NN氧空位

    Figure 3.  Three-dimensional differential charge density (e/Bohr3), observed in the [001] direction: (a) Nb3+ with 1NN-Ovac in t-ZrO2; (b) Nb5+ with 1NN-Ovac in t-ZrO2; (c) Sn2+ with 1NN-Ovac in t-ZrO2; (d) Sn4+ with 1NN-Ovac in t-ZrO2. The value of the blue isosurface is –0.008 e/Bohr3, yellow isosurface is 0.008 e/Bohr3.

    图 4  二维差分电荷密度(e/Bohr3), 取自$ {M}^{x+} $-Ovac对所在的(100)面 (a) Nb3+-Ovac; (b) Nb5+-Ovac; (c) Sn2+-Ovac; (d) Sn4+-Ovac

    Figure 4.  Two-dimensional differential charge density (e/Bohr3), taken from the (100) plane in which $ {M}^{x+} $-Ovac is located: (a) Nb3+-Ovac; (b) Nb5+-Ovac; (c) Sn2+-Ovac; (d) Sn4+-Ovac.

    图 5  电子局域函数, 取自$ {M}^{x+} $-Ovac所在的(100)面 (a) Nb3+-Ovac; (b) Nb5+-Ovac; (c) Sn2+-Ovac; (d) Sn4+-Ovac

    Figure 5.  Electron localization function, taken from the (100) plane in which $ {M}^{x+} $-Ovac is located: (a) Nb3+-Ovac; (b) Nb5+-Ovac; (c) Sn2+-Ovac; (d) Sn4+-Ovac.

    表 1  锆(亚)氧化物的晶格常数(a, b, c)、晶胞矢量夹角(α, β, γ)及形成焓(Hf)

    Table 1.  Lattice constants (a, b, c), unit cell vector angles (α, β, γ ) and formation enthalpy (Hf) of Zr (sub)oxides.

    Phaseabcα/(°)β/(°)γ/(°)$ {H}_{{\mathrm{f}}} $/eVRef.
    m-ZrO25.19015.24415.376090.0099.6390.00–3.860This work
    5.18505.27805.286090.0099.6590.00–3.778DFT-GGA[40]
    5.07915.17855.234090.0099.4990.00DFT-LDA[50]
    5.09305.17605.244090.0099.1090.00DFT-LDA[51]
    5.07905.20805.311090.0099.2390.00Exp.[52]
    5.14735.20885.316690.0099.2190.00Exp.[50]
    t-ZrO23.62203.62205.273390.0090.0090.00–3.823This work
    3.63703.63705.282090.0090.0090.00–3.743DFT-GGA[40]
    3.57803.57805.163090.0090.0090.00DFT-LDA[39]
    3.59483.59485.182490.0090.0090.00Exp.[53]
    3.59163.59165.179090.0090.0090.00Exp.[54]
    3.59613.59615.177090.0090.0090.00Exp.[55]
    h-ZrO5.31105.31103.200590.0090.00120.00–2.975This work
    5.28505.28503.179090.0090.00120.00DFT-GGA[56]
    5.31005.31003.200090.0090.00120.00Exp.[22]
    DownLoad: CSV

    表 2  12原子超胞的晶格常数(a, b, c)、基矢夹角(α, β, γ), ZrO2单元平均体积(V ), $ {M}^{x+} $掺杂超胞体积的变化($\Delta V $)

    Table 2.  Lattice constants (a, b, c), basis vector angles (α, β, γ), average volume of ZrO2 unit (V ) of the 12-atom supercell, and the volume change ($ \Delta V$) of supercell with $ {M}^{x+} $ doping.

    Phaseabcα/(°)β/(°)γ/(°)V3ΔV3ΔV/V0/%
    pure phasest3.623.625.2890.0090.0090.0034.62
    m5.195.245.3890.0099.6390.0036.07
    Nb5+ dopingt3.523.515.0790.0090.0090.0031.27–3.34–10.69
    m4.945.185.0090.1096.7589.6931.76–4.31–13.56
    Nb4+ dopingt3.613.615.2490.0090.0090.0034.07–0.55–1.61
    m5.145.205.3689.90100.4889.2335.28–0.79–2.23
    Nb3+ dopingt3.334.237.0290.0090.0090.0049.4914.8830.06
    m5.325.305.5290.14102.4689.7138.021.955.14
    Sn4+ dopingt3.653.595.3590.0090.0090.0035.080.461.31
    m5.205.165.4789.6297.1488.2236.410.340.93
    Sn2+ dopingt4.143.417.0090.0090.0090.0049.3414.7329.84
    m5.805.906.1890.26115.5589.9347.7711.7024.48
    DownLoad: CSV

    表 3  $ {E}_{{\mathrm{f}}}({\mathrm{O}}x, P) $, $ {{\Delta }}E({\mathrm{O}}x, P) $的计算值, 其中浓度$ C= $ $ {n}_{M}/({n}_{{\mathrm{Z}}{\mathrm{r}}}+{n}_{M}) $

    Table 3.  Values of $ {E}_{{\mathrm{f}}}({\mathrm{O}}x, P) $ and $ {{\Delta }}E({\mathrm{O}}x, P) $. $ C= $$ {n}_{M}/({n}_{{\mathrm{Z}}{\mathrm{r}}}+{n}_{M}) $.

    M x+ Phases C/%
    25 6.25 3.125
    E(Ox, 0)
    /(eV·atom–1)
    Pure t –3.82
    m –3.86
    Sn4+ t –3.47 –3.74 –3.78
    m –3.51 –3.77 –3.82
    Sn2+ t –2.72 –3.54 –3.68
    m –2.83 –3.59 –3.72
    Nb5+ t –4.38 –3.96 –3.89
    m –4.39 –3.98 –3.92
    Nb4+ t –3.44 –3.75 –3.79
    m –3.49 –3.79 –3.82
    Nb3+ t –2.72 –3.54 –3.68
    m –2.68 –3.60 –3.73
    $ \Delta $E($ {\mathrm{O}}x $, 0)
    /(meV·atom–1)
    Pure –36.92
    Sn4+ –38.14 –33.90 –35.47
    Sn2+ –115.96 –49.31 –42.26
    Nb5+ –7.99 –20.81 –29.65
    Nb4+ –51.89 –38.89 –38.11
    Nb3+ 38.71 –60.04 –48.30
    DownLoad: CSV

    表 4  t-ZrO2中氧空位形成能. $ {\mathrm{O}}x $表示纯ZrO2或3.125%浓度$ {M}^{x+} $掺杂的ZrO2; $ {M}^{x+} $包括Nb3+, Nb4+, Nb5+, Sn2+, Sn4+; $ {E}_{{\mathrm{f}}}^{{1{\mathrm{N}}{\mathrm{N}}{\text{-}}{\mathrm{O}}}_{{\mathrm{v}}{\mathrm{a}}{\mathrm{c}}}} $, $ {E}_{{\mathrm{f}}}^{{2{\mathrm{N}}{\mathrm{N}}{\text{-}}{\mathrm{O}}}_{{\mathrm{v}}{\mathrm{a}}{\mathrm{c}}}} $分别表示$ {M}^{x+} $的1NN, 2NN氧空位形成能

    Table 4.  Oxygen vacancy formation energy in t-ZrO2. $ {\mathrm{O}}x $ represent pure ZrO2 or ZrO2 with 3.125% $ {M}^{x+} $ doping, and $ {M}^{x+}= $ Nb3+, Nb4+, Nb5+, Sn2+, Sn4+. $ {E}_{{\mathrm{f}}}^{{1{\mathrm{N}}{\mathrm{N}}{\text{-}}{\mathrm{O}}}_{{\mathrm{v}}{\mathrm{a}}{\mathrm{c}}}} $ and $ {E}_{{\mathrm{f}}}^{{2{\mathrm{N}}{\mathrm{N}}{\text{-}}{\mathrm{O}}}_{{\mathrm{v}}{\mathrm{a}}{\mathrm{c}}}} $ represent the 1NN and 2NN oxygen vacancy formation energies of $ {M}^{x+} $, respectively.

    $ {\mathrm{O}}x $
    Pure Nb5+ Nb4+ Nb3+ Sn4+ Sn2+
    $ {E}_{{\mathrm{f}}}^{{1{\mathrm{N}}{\mathrm{N}}{\text{-}}{\mathrm{O}}}_{{\mathrm{v}}{\mathrm{a}}{\mathrm{c}}}} $/eV 6.353 5.771 5.691 5.252 4.474 3.905
    $ {E}_{{\mathrm{f}}}^{{2{\mathrm{N}}{\mathrm{N}}{\text{-}}{\mathrm{O}}}_{{\mathrm{v}}{\mathrm{a}}{\mathrm{c}}}} $/eV 5.938 5.919 5.362 5.257 5.029
    DownLoad: CSV
  • [1]

    Yuan R, Xie Y P, Li T, Xu C H, Yao M Y, Xu J X, Guo H B, Zhou B X 2021 Acta Mater. 209 116804Google Scholar

    [2]

    Kim T, Couet A, Kim S, Lee Y, Yoo S C, Kim J H 2020 Corros. Sci. 173 108745Google Scholar

    [3]

    Liu S M, Beyerlein I J, Han W Z 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 5766Google Scholar

    [4]

    Wei K J, Chen L, Qu Y, Zhang Y F, Jin X Y, Xue W B, Zhang J L 2018 Corros. Sci. 143 129Google Scholar

    [5]

    Zhou B F, Feng K Q 2018 RSC Adv. 8 26251Google Scholar

    [6]

    Bell B D C, Murphy S T, Burr P A, Comstock R J, Partezana J M, Grimes R W, Wenman M R 2016 Corros. Sci. 105 36Google Scholar

    [7]

    Nikulina A V 2004 Met. Sci. Heat Treat. 46 458Google Scholar

    [8]

    Ruiz-Hervias J, Simbruner K, Cristobal-Beneyto M, Perez-Gallego D, Zencker U 2021 J. Nucl. Mater. 544 152668Google Scholar

    [9]

    Zhang F L, Chai L J, Qi L, Wang Y Y, Wu L, Pan H C, Teng C Q, Murty K L 2023 J. Nucl. Mater. 577 154284Google Scholar

    [10]

    Qin W, Nam C, Li H L, Szpunar J A 2007 Acta Mater. 55 1695Google Scholar

    [11]

    Liao J J, Yang Z B, Qiu S Y, Peng Q, Li Z C, Zhang J S 2019 J. Nucl. Mater. 524 101Google Scholar

    [12]

    Motta A T, Couet A, Comstock R J 2015 Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 45 311Google Scholar

    [13]

    Hillner E, Franklin D G, Smee J D 2000 J. Nucl. Mater. 278 334Google Scholar

    [14]

    Couet A, Motta A T, Ambard A 2015 Corros. Sci. 100 73Google Scholar

    [15]

    Yilmazbayhan A, Motta A T, Comstock R J, Sabol G P, Lai B, Cai Z 2004 J. Nucl. Mater. 324 6Google Scholar

    [16]

    Massih A R, Vesterlund G 1992 Nucl. Eng. Des. 137 57Google Scholar

    [17]

    Motta A T 2011 JOM 63 59Google Scholar

    [18]

    Bouineau V, Bénier G, Pêcheur D, Thomazet J, Ambard A, Blat M 2010 Nucl. Technol. 170 444Google Scholar

    [19]

    Takagi I, Une K, Miyamura S, Kobayashi T 2011 J. Nucl. Mater. 419 339Google Scholar

    [20]

    Couet A, Borrel L, Liu J L, Hu J, Grovenor C 2019 Corros. Sci. 159 108134Google Scholar

    [21]

    Hu J, Garner A, Frankel P, Li M, Kirk M A, Lozano-Perez S, Preuss M, Grovenor C 2019 Acta Mater. 173 313Google Scholar

    [22]

    Liu J L, Yu H B, Karamched P, Hu J, He G Z, Goran D, Hughes G M, Wilkinson A J, Lozano-Perez S, Grovenor C R M 2019 Acta Mater. 179 328Google Scholar

    [23]

    Kurpaska L, Favergeon J, Lahoche L, Moulin G, Marssi M El, Roelandt J M 2013 Oxid. Met. 79 261Google Scholar

    [24]

    Xun G, Qingdong L, Wenqing L, Meiyi Y, Bangxin Z 2008 Rare Met. Mater. Eng. 37 1415Google Scholar

    [25]

    Beie H, Mitwalsky A, Garzarolli F, Ruhmann H, Sell H 1994 Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: Tenth International Symposium (West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International) pp615–643

    [26]

    Barberis P 1995 J. Nucl. Mater. 226 34Google Scholar

    [27]

    Polatidis E, Frankel P, Wei J, Klaus M, Comstock R J, Ambard A, Lyon S, Cottis R A, Preuss M 2013 J. Nucl. Mater. 432 102Google Scholar

    [28]

    Bouvier P, Godlewski J, Lucazeau G 2002 J. Nucl. Mater. 300 118Google Scholar

    [29]

    Preuss M, Frankel P, Polatidis E, Wei J, Smith J W, Wang C, Cottis R A, Lyon S B, Lozano-Perez S, Hudson D, Ni N, Grovenor C R M, Smith G D W, Sykes J, Cerezo A, Storer S, Fitzpatrick M E 2011 16th International Symposium on Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry Chengdu, China, May 9–13, 2010

    [30]

    Wei J, Frankel P, Polatidis E, Blat M, Ambard A, Comstock R J, Hallstadius L, Hudson D, Smith G D W, Grovenor C R M, Klaus M, Cottis R A, Lyon S, Preuss M 2013 Acta Mater. 61 4200Google Scholar

    [31]

    Garner A, Hu J, Harte A, Frankel P, Grovenor C, Lozano-Perez S, Preuss M 2015 Acta Mater. 99 259Google Scholar

    [32]

    Jeong Y H, Lee K O, Kim H G 2002 J. Nucl. Mater. 302 9Google Scholar

    [33]

    Jeong Y H, Kim H G, Kim T H 2003 J. Nucl. Mater. 317 1Google Scholar

    [34]

    Sakamoto K, Une K, Aomi M, Otsuka T, Hashizume K 2015 J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 52 1259Google Scholar

    [35]

    Liao J J, Xu F, Peng Q, Yang Z B, Li Z C, Qiu S Y 2020 J. Nucl. Mater. 528 151846Google Scholar

    [36]

    Froideval A, Degueldre C, Segre C U, Pouchon M A, Grolimund D 2008 Corros. Sci. 50 1313Google Scholar

    [37]

    Hulme H, Baxter F, Babu R P, Denecke M A, Gass M, Steuwer A, Norén K, Carlson S, Preuss M 2016 Corros. Sci. 105 202Google Scholar

    [38]

    Wu J W, Xie Y P, Yao M Y, Guan S H, Zhao Y, Pan R J, Wu L, Liu Z P 2023 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25 8934Google Scholar

    [39]

    Zhao X S, Shang S L, Liu Z K, Shen J Y 2011 J. Nucl. Mater. 415 13Google Scholar

    [40]

    赵毅, 王栋, 徐晨皓, 吴江桅, 王洋, 谢耀平 2021 上海金属 43 112Google Scholar

    Zhao Y, Wang D, Xu C H, Wu J W, Wang Y, Xie Y P 2021 Shanghai Met. 43 112Google Scholar

    [41]

    Kresse G, Hafner J 1993 Phys. Rev. B 47 558Google Scholar

    [42]

    Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Comput. Mater. Sci. 6 15Google Scholar

    [43]

    Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169Google Scholar

    [44]

    Blöchl P E 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 17953Google Scholar

    [45]

    Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 1396Google Scholar

    [46]

    Monkhorst H J, Pack J D 1976 Phys. Rev. B 13 5188Google Scholar

    [47]

    Methfessel M, Paxton A T 1989 Phys. Rev. B 40 3616Google Scholar

    [48]

    Barbour O, Crocombette J P, Schuler T, Tupin M 2020 J. Nucl. Mater. 539 152333Google Scholar

    [49]

    Zhang P, Lu Y, He C H, Zhang P 2011 J. Nucl. Mater. 418 143Google Scholar

    [50]

    Fukui H, Fujimoto M, Akahama Y, Sano-Furukawa A, Hattori T 2019 Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B Struct. Sci. Cryst. Eng. Mater. 75 742Google Scholar

    [51]

    Delaforce P M, Yeomans J A, Filkin N C, Wright G J, Thomson R C 2007 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 90 918Google Scholar

    [52]

    Torres F J, Amigó J M, Alarcón J 2003 J. Solid State Chem. 173 40Google Scholar

    [53]

    Lutterotti L, Scardi P 1990 J. Appl. Crystallogr. 23 246Google Scholar

    [54]

    Bouvier P, Djurado E, Lucazeau G, Le Bihan T 2000 Phys. Rev. B 62 8731Google Scholar

    [55]

    Bondars B, Heidemane G, Grabis J, Laschke K, Boysen H, Schneider J, Frey F 1995 J. Mater. Sci. 30 1621Google Scholar

    [56]

    Puchala B, der Ven A 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 94108Google Scholar

    [57]

    Fisher E S, Renken C J 1964 Phys. Rev. 135 A482Google Scholar

    [58]

    Anada H, Takeda K 1996 Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: Eleventh International Symposium (West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International) pp35–54

    [59]

    Wang C, Zinkevich M, Aldinger F 2004 Calphad 28 281Google Scholar

    [60]

    Chevalier P Y, Fischer E, Cheynet B 2004 Calphad 28 15Google Scholar

    [61]

    Schubert H, Frey F 2005 J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 25 1597Google Scholar

    [62]

    Becke A D, Edgecombe K E 1990 J. Chem. Phys. 92 5397Google Scholar

  • [1] Liu Zhi-Cheng, Zhou Jie, Chen Fan, Peng Biao, Peng Wen-Yi, Zhang Ai-Sheng, Deng Xiao-Hua, Luo Xian-Zhi, Liu Ri-Xin, Liu De-Wu, Huang Yu, Yan Jun. First-principles study of influence of Si on γ phase in Inconel 718 alloy. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(18): 186301. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230583
    [2] Zhou Jin-Ping, Li Chun-Mei, Jiang Bo, Huang Ren-Zhong. First-principles study of Co and Ni excess effects on crystal structure and phase stability of Co2NiGa alloy. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(15): 156301. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230626
    [3] Yang Shun-Jie, Li Chun-Mei, Zhou Jin-Ping. First-principles study of magnetic disordering and alloying effects on phase stability and elastic constants of Co2CrZ (Z = Ga, Si, Ge) alloys. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(10): 106201. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212254
    [4] Luo Xiong, Meng Wei-Wei, Chen Guo-Xu-Jia, Guan Xiao-Xi, Jia Shuang-Feng, Zheng He, Wang Jian-Bo. First-principles study of stability, electronic and optical properties of two-dimensional Nb2SiTe4-based materials. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(19): 197102. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200848
    [5] Lin Qi-Min, Zhang Xia, Lu Qi-Chao, Luo Yan-Bin, Cui Jian-Gong, Yan Xin, Ren Xiao-Min, Huang Xue. First-principles study on structural stability of graphene oxide and catalytic activity of nitric acid. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(24): 247302. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20191304
    [6] Zhou Hong-Cai, Huang Shu-Lai, Li Gui-Xia, Yu Gui-Feng, Wang Juan, Bu Hong-Xia. First-principles prediction of carbon monoxide nanotube bundles in low pressure phase. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(21): 217101. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190539
    [7] Hu Jie-Qiong, Xie Ming, Chen Jia-Lin, Liu Man-Men, Chen Yong-Tai, Wang Song, Wang Sai-Bei, Li Ai-Kun. First principles study of electronic and elastic properties of Ti3AC2 (A = Si, Sn, Al, Ge) phases. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(5): 057102. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.057102
    [8] Dong Shan, Zhang Yan-Xing, Zhang Xi-Lin, Xu Xiao-Pei, Mao Jian-Jun, Li Dong-Lin, Chen Zhi-Ming, Ma Kuan, Fan Zheng-Quan, Wei Dan-Dan, Yang Zong-Xian. The first-principles study on the interaction of Ni with the yttria-stabilized zirconia and the activity of the interface. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(6): 068201. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.068201
    [9] Ma Zhen-Ning, Zhou Quan, Wang Qing-Jie, Wang Xun, Wang Lei. First-principles study of the thermodynamic stabilities and electronic structures of long-period stacking ordered phases in Mg-Y-Cu alloys. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(23): 236101. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.236101
    [10] Wan Ming-Jun, Li Chun-Fu, Wen Ping, Zhang Feng-Chun, Wang Yao, Liu En-Zuo. The bond characters and phase stability effects of Cr Mo and Ni in bulk -Fe(C. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(3): 037101. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.037101
    [11] Ma Zhen-Ning, Jiang Min, Wang Lei. First-principles study of electronic structures and phase stabilities of ternary intermetallic compounds in the Mg-Y-Zn alloys. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(18): 187102. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.187102
    [12] Ru Qiang, Li Yan-Ling, Hu She-Jun, Peng Wei, Zhang Zhi-Wen. The investigation of lithium insertion mechanism for Sn3InSb4 alloy based on first-principle calculation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(3): 038210. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.038210
    [13] Guan Dong-Bo, Mao Jian. First principles study of the electronic structure and optical properties of Magnli phase titanium suboxides Ti8O15. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(1): 017102. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.017102
    [14] Zheng Shu-Wen, Fan Guang-Han, Li Shu-Ti, Zhang Tao, Su Chen. Energy band properties and phase stability of Be1-xMgxO alloy. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(23): 237101. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.237101
    [15] Chen Yue-Yun, Hou Chun-Ju, Kong Xiang-Shan, Liu Chang-Song, Wang Xian-Ping, Fang Qian-Feng. Theorectical study of the oxide-ion conductorLa2Mo2-xMxO9(M=Cr,W). Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(4): 046603. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.046603
    [16] Hu Yu-Ping, Ping Kai-Bin, Yan Zhi-Jie, Yang Wen, Gong Chang-Wei. First-principles calculations of structure and magnetic properties of -Fe(Si)phase precipitated in the Finemet alloy. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(10): 107504. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.107504
    [17] Yu Song-Nan, Wu Han-Hua, Chen Gen-Yu, Yuan Xin, Li Yue. Effect of Al(OH)3 sol concentration on characteristics of microarc oxidation coatings of titanium alloy. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(2): 028104. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.028104
    [18] Xu Wen-Wu, Song Xiao-Yan, Li Er-Dong, Wei Jun, Li Ling-Mei. Phase configuration and stability in the nanocrystalline Sm-Co system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(5): 3280-3286. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.3280
    [19] Zhu Jian-Xin, Li Yong-Hua, Meng Fan-Ling, Liu Chang-Sheng, Zheng Wei-Tao, Wang Yu-Ming. A first principles investigation on NiTi alloy. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(11): 7204-7209. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.7204
    [20] Wu Han-Hua, Long Bei-Hong, Long Bei-Yu, Tang Yuan-Guang, Chang Hong, Bai Yi-Zhen. Characteristics of electrical parameters during microarc oxidation of titanium alloys. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(11): 6537-6542. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.6537
Metrics
  • Abstract views:  1957
  • PDF Downloads:  75
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  30 April 2024
  • Accepted Date:  16 June 2024
  • Available Online:  27 June 2024
  • Published Online:  05 August 2024

/

返回文章
返回