-
The classical single bubble's acoustic emission equation has been used for a long time to describe the sound filed of the bubble radiation, however, this formula does not consider the influence of the viscosity of the medium in the process of sound wave propagation, so in some special cases, it is more reasonable to make corresponding corrections to it.
Based on the boundary condition of the bubble, i.e., the vibration velocity of the bubble wall is equal to the velocity of the particle vibration velocity of the external medium at the bubble's boundary, the acoustic wave equation in spherical coordinate system in viscous medium is solved, then the modified acoustic emission formula of the bubble in the viscous medium is given.
In the numerical calculations part, the bubble radius R(t) is solved from the bubble dynamics equation using the fourth-fifth order Runge-Kutta method. Then the bubble's radiation sound field is obtained using the direct substitution method and the finite element (The pressure acoustics module; 2D axisymmetric geometric model) method respectively to find out that, the modified expression "ppresent" given in this paper is more accurate to describe the bubble's radiation than the classical expression "pclassical" at the high-viscosity, high-frequency and long-distance case. In these cases, if the acoustic emission of bubbles continues to be measured using the classical expression, it may have an impact on the characterization of cavitation, such as the inaccurate description of parameters like cavitation intensity and cavitation threshold.-
Keywords:
- Bubble acoustic emission /
- Viscous acoustic wave equation /
- Bubble dynamics /
- Finite element simulation
-
[1] Knapp R T, Daily J W, Hammitt F G (translated by China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower) 1981 Cavitation (Beijing: China Water & Power Press) pp8-11 (in Chinese) [柯乃普R T, 达利 J W, 哈米特 F G著(水利水电科学研究所译)1981 空化与空蚀(北京:水利出版社)第8-11页]
[2] Wang D Z, Shang E C 2013 Underwater Acoustics (Beijing: Science Press) pp376, pp590 (in Chinese) [汪德昭,尚尔昌 2013 水声学(北京:科学出版社)第376,590页]
[3] Wan M X, Feng Y, Haar G T 2015 Cavitation in biomedicine:principles and techniques (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer) pp1-5, pp47-49
[4] Du G H, Wu J R 1990 J. Acoust. Soc. Am 87 965
[5] Ye Z 1997 J. Acoust. Soc. Am 101 809
[6] Zilonova E, Solovchuk M, Sheu TW 2019 Phys. Rev. E 99 023109
[7] Kou S Y, Chen W Z, Wu Y R, Zhao G Y 2023 Ultrason Sonochem 94 106352
[8] Yuan Y, An Y 2021 Int Commun Heat Mass 126 105378
[9] Qin D, Zou Q Q, Li Z Y, Wang W, Wan M X, Feng Y 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 154701 [秦对,邹青钦,李章勇,王伟,万明习,冯怡 2021 物理学报 70 154701]
[10] Liu R, Huang C Y, Wu Y R, Hu J, Mo R Y, Wang C H 2024 Acta Phys. Sin. 73 084303 [刘睿,黄晨阳,武耀蓉,胡静,莫润阳,王成会 2024 物理学报 73 084303]
[11] Shen X Z, Wu P F, Lin W J 2024 Ultrason Sonochem 107 106890
[12] Zhang H L 2012 Theoretical Acoustics (revised version) (Beijing: Higher Education Press pp221-223) [张海澜 2012 理论声学(修订版)(北京:高等教育出版社)第221-223页]
[13] Currie G I 2003 Fundamental Mechanics of Fluids (3rd Edition) (Boca Raton: CRC Press) pp30-33
[14] Filonets T, Solovchuk M 2022 Ultrason Sonochem 88 106056
[15] Keller J B, Miksis M 1980 J. Acoust. Soc. Am 68 628
[16] Lauterborn W, Kurz T 2010 Rep. Prog. Phys 73 106501
Metrics
- Abstract views: 144
- PDF Downloads: 0
- Cited By: 0