-
In order to further study the nonlinear characteristics of the resonance magnetoelectric coefficient and vibration mode at the resonance frequency, three-layer magnetoelectric composite with length direction magnetization and thickness direction polarization is investigated in the article. Firstly, based on the Z-L model and the numerical solution characteristics of magnetization intensity, the magnetization intensity function was fitted, and the dynamic parameters of the giant magnetostrictive material, including dynamic piezomagnetic coefficient, dynamic elastic compliance coefficient, and dynamic magnetic permeability, were further derived. The effects of bias magnetic field and prestress on the corresponding composite were analyzed; Secondly, based on the nonlinear magnetostrictive constitutive equation, a symmetric magneto-elastic-electric equivalent circuit model of magnetoelectric laminate composite was established, and the expression of magnetoelectric coefficient was derived. The variation curve with bias magnetic field and prestress was analyzed, which is consistent with the conclusions of existing literature [8] and [9]; Finally, in order to compare with the theoretical results, the same parameters were set using COMSOL software, and the corresponding magnetoelectric coefficient frequency curve was plotted. The two results were in good agreement, and the maximum peak modal vibration shape was extracted, which can conveniently observe the vibration of the magneto electric laminate composite in the length direction. The results indicate that the theoretical model of this symmetric magneto-elastic-electric equivalent circuit and the numerical simulation method using COMSOL software are feasible, laying the foundation for further nonlinear analysis of magnetoelectric laminate composite and making it possible to design high-precision magnetoelectric micro devices.
-
Keywords:
- nonlinear /
- magnetoelectric laminated composite /
- symmetric equivalent circuit theory /
- numerical simulation
-
-
[1] 谢冰鸿, 徐国凯, 肖绍球, 喻忠军, 朱大立 2023 物理学报 11 117501
Xie B H, Xu G K, Xiao S Q, Yu Z J, Zhu D L 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 11 117501
[2] Truong B D 2020 IEEE Sens. J. 2967808
[3] Han J, Zhang J J, Gao Y W 2018 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 466 200Google Scholar
[4] 杨娜娜, 陈轩, 汪尧进 2018 物理学报 15 157508Google Scholar
Yang N N, Chen X, Wang Y J 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 15 157508Google Scholar
[5] Zhang X L, Zhou J P, Yao X, Yang Z P, Zhang G B 2020 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 501 166411Google Scholar
[6] Zheng X J, Sun L 2006 J. Appl. Phys. 100 063906
[7] Lin L Z, Wan Y P, Li F X 2012 IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 7 1568
[8] Zhou H M, Ou X W, Xiao Y, Qu S X, Wu H P 2013 Smart Mater. Struct. 22 035018
[9] Zhou H M, Li C, Xuan L M, Wei J 2011 Smart Mater. Struct. 20 035001Google Scholar
[10] Liang Y R, Zheng X J 2007 Acta Mech. Solida Sin. 20 283Google Scholar
[11] Moffett M B, Linberg J, Mclaughlin E A 1991 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89 1448Google Scholar
[12] Zheng X J, Liu X E 2005 J. Appl. Phys. 97 053901Google Scholar
[13] Zhou H M, Cui X L 2014 Smart Mater. Struct. 23 105104
[14] Shi Y, 2018 Compos. Struct. 185 474Google Scholar
[15] Li J Z, Wen Y M, Li P, Yang J 2017 IEEE Trans. Power Electr. 53 2500406
[16] Muchenik T I, Barbero E J 2015 Smart Mater. Struct. 24 025039Google Scholar
[17] Zhou J P, Yang Y, Zhang G B, Peng J H, Liu P 2016 Compos. Struct. 155 107Google Scholar
[18] Zhang X L, Zhou J P, Yao X, Yang Z P, Zhang G B 2019 AIP Adv. 9 105315Google Scholar
[19] 卞雷祥, 文玉梅, 李平 2009 物理学报 58 4205Google Scholar
Bian L X, Wen Y M, Li P 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 4205Google Scholar
[20] Zhou H M, Xuan L M, Li C, Wei J 2011 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 323 2802
[21] Boukazouha F, Poulin-Vittrant G, Tran-Huu-Hue L P, Bavencoffe M, Boubenider F 2015 Ultrasonics 60 41Google Scholar
[22] Malleron K, Talleb H, Gensbittel A, Ren Z 2017 IEEE Trans. Magn. 53 8102104
[23] Fu X, Gou Y 2022 Appl. Acoust. 193 108752Google Scholar
[24] Zhang X L, Yin Q P, Li G, Yao X 2022 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 564 170112
Metrics
- Abstract views: 100
- PDF Downloads: 9
- Cited By: 0