-
Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are widely used in portable electronic devices, electric vehicles, and other fields. With the rapid development of its application fields, there is an urgent need to further improve its energy density and safety. In the charging/discharging process of the LIBs, the diffusion of Li will cause local volumetric change in the electrode material. The degradation and damage of the electrode material structure caused by diffusion-induced deformation is a major obstacle to the development of LIBs. Generally speaking, the electrode materials in LIBs are always subject to specific external constraints, including both inevitable passive structural constraints within the battery and external active constraints that may be imposed by emerging technology application scenarios, which can also affect the mechanical properties of the electrode materials. Therefore, a more in-depth understanding of the diffusion-induced stress and Li concentration changes in the electrode material is an engineering requirement for developing new material design paradigms to improve the overall performance of LIBs. In this work, a two-way diffusion-stress coupling model is used to discuss the effects of the four different levels of idealized deformation constraints on the Li concentration and stress in the bilayer plate electrode in the charging process through the numerical solution. From a mechanical perspective, the bilayer plate electrode structure has two degrees of freedom: lateral expansion and bending deformation. Weakened constraint conditions can partially or completely activate these stress release mechanisms, thereby reducing the overall stress level of the electrode structure and improving its mechanical stability. However, from an electrochemical perspective, the stress gradient generated by the forward bending deformation of the electrode structure can hinder the Li intercalation process. Enhanced constraints can partially or completely suppress the forward bending of the electrode, making the Li concentration in the active layer more uniform and thus improving the capacity utilization efficiency of the active layer. These results not only provide theoretical references for further understanding the chemical-mechanical response of the bilayer electrodes under more realistic or extreme service conditions, but also indicate from a design perspective that compromised external constraints are beneficial for balancing the structural durability and electrochemical performance of electrodes.
-
Keywords:
- lithium-ion battery /
- chemical-mechanical coupling /
- plate electrode /
- mechanical constraint
[1] Zhang H, Li C M, Eshetu G G, et al. 2020 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 534Google Scholar
[2] Mukhopadhyay A, Sheldon B W 2014 Prog. Mater. Sci. 63 58Google Scholar
[3] 张俊乾, 吕浡, 宋亦诚 2017 力学季刊 38 14
Zhang J Q, Lü B, Song Y C 2017 Chin. Q. Mech. 38 14
[4] Zhao Y, Stein P, Bai Y, Al-Siraj M, Yang Y, Xu B X 2019 J. Power Sources 413 259Google Scholar
[5] de Vasconcelos L S, Xu R, Xu Z, et al. 2022 Chem. Rev. 122 13043Google Scholar
[6] Yang F 2024 J. Energy Storage 75 109634Google Scholar
[7] Haftbaradaran H, Gao H, Curtin W A 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 96 091909Google Scholar
[8] Vanimisetti S K, Ramakrishnan N 2012 Proc. IMechE Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 226 2192Google Scholar
[9] Lu B, Ning C Q, Shi D X, Zhao Y F, Zhang J Q 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 026201Google Scholar
[10] Li J, Dozier A K, Li Y, Yang F, Cheng Y T 2011 J. Electrochem. Soc. 158 A689Google Scholar
[11] Chew H B, Hou B, Wang X, Xia S 2014 Int. J. Solids Struct. 51 4176Google Scholar
[12] Xie H, Zhang Q, Song H, Shi B, Kang Y 2017 J. Power Sources 342 896Google Scholar
[13] Li D, Wang Y, Hu J, Lu B, Cheng Y T, Zhang J 2017 J. Power Sources 366 80Google Scholar
[14] Sethuraman V A, Chon M J, Shimshak M, Srinivasan V, Guduru P R 2010 J. Power Sources 195 5062Google Scholar
[15] Pharr M, Suo Z, Vlassak J J 2013 Nano Lett. 13 5570Google Scholar
[16] Guo Z S, Zhang T, Zhu J, Wang Y 2014 Comput. Mater. Sci. 94 218Google Scholar
[17] 宋旭, 陆勇俊, 石明亮, 赵翔, 王峰会 2018 物理学报 67 140201Google Scholar
Song X, Lu Y J, Shi M L, Zhao X, Wang F H 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 140201Google Scholar
[18] Lu Y, Che Q, Song X, Wang F, Zhao X 2018 Scr. Mater. 150 164Google Scholar
[19] Zhang J, Lu B, Song Y, Ji X 2012 J. Power Sources 209 220Google Scholar
[20] Yang B, He Y P, Irsa J, Lundgren C A, Ratchford J B, Zhao Y P 2012 J. Power Sources 204 168Google Scholar
[21] Hao F, Fang D 2013 J. Power Sources 242 415Google Scholar
[22] Song Y, Shao X, Guo Z, Zhang J 2013 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 46 105307Google Scholar
[23] He Y L, Hu H J, Song Y C, Guo Z S, Liu C, Zhang J Q 2014 J. Power Sources 248 517Google Scholar
[24] Song Y, Li Z, Zhang J 2014 J. Power Sources 263 22Google Scholar
[25] Zhang X Y, Hao F, Chen H S, Fang D N 2015 Mech. Mater. 91 351Google Scholar
[26] Ji L, Guo Z, Du S, Chen L 2017 Int. J. Mech. Sci. 134 599Google Scholar
[27] Liu D, Chen W, Shen X 2017 Compos. Struct. 165 91Google Scholar
[28] Yin J, Shao X, Lu B, Song Y, Zhang J 2018 Appl. Math. Mech. 39 1567Google Scholar
[29] Pouyanmehr R, Hassanzadeh-Aghdam M K, Ansari R 2020 Mech. Mater. 145 103390Google Scholar
[30] Zhang A, Wang B, Li G, Wang J, Du J 2020 Eng. Fract. Mech. 235 107189Google Scholar
[31] Gao C, Guan L, Shi Y, Zhou J, Cai R 2022 Acta Mech. 233 5265Google Scholar
[32] Zhang P, Wang Q, Qiu W, Feng L 2023 J. Electrochem. Soc. 170 050508Google Scholar
[33] Crank J 1979 The Mathematics of Diffusion (London: Oxford University Press) p61
[34] Prussin S 1961 J. Appl. Phys. 32 1876Google Scholar
[35] Zhang X, Shyy W, Sastry A M 2007 J. Electrochem. Soc. 154 A910Google Scholar
[36] He Y, Hu H, Huang D 2016 Mater. Des. 92 438Google Scholar
[37] Xia X, Afshar A, Yang H, Portela C M, Kochmann D M, Di Leo C V, Greer J R 2019 Nature 573 205Google Scholar
[38] Qiu W, Zhang J, Su D, Zhang Y, Zhang P, Wang Q, Feng L 2023 Int. J. Mech. Sci. 248 108231Google Scholar
[39] Berg S, Akturk A, Kammoun M, Ardebili H 2017 Extreme Mech. Lett. 13 108Google Scholar
[40] Shi Y, Xu C, Weng L, Wei Y, Chen B, Wang Y, Zhou J, Cai R 2021 Mech. Mater. 161 104024Google Scholar
[41] Kim S, Choi S J, Zhao K, Yang H, Gobbi G, Zhang S, Li J 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 10146Google Scholar
[42] Johannisson W, Harnden R, Zenkert D, Lindbergh G 2020 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 117 7658Google Scholar
[43] Carlstedt D, Runesson K, Larsson F, Jänicke R, Asp L E 2023 J. Mech. Phys. Solids 179 105371Google Scholar
[44] Zhou W 2015 Electrochim. Acta 185 28Google Scholar
[45] Xuan F Z, Shao S S, Wang Z, Tu S T 2008 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 015401
[46] Zhu Z, Hu H, He Y, Tao B 2018 Compos. Struct. 204 822Google Scholar
[47] Zhu Z, Wan J, Wu T, Huang P 2022 Acta Mech. 233 2471Google Scholar
[48] Song X, Lu Y, Wang F, Zhao X, Chen H 2020 J. Power Sources 452 227803Google Scholar
[49] Peng Y, Hao F 2023 J. Energy Storage 57 106195Google Scholar
[50] Shi Y, Xu C, Chen B, Zhou J, Cai R 2023 Appl. Math. Mech. 44 189Google Scholar
[51] Guan L, Shi Y, Gao C, Wang T, Zhou J, Cai R 2023 Electrochim. Acta 440 141669Google Scholar
[52] Geng S, Zhang K, Zheng B, Zhang Y 2024 Acta Mech. 235 191Google Scholar
[53] Zhuang Y, Zou Z Y, Lu B, Li Y J, Wang D, Avdeev M, Shi S Q 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 068202Google Scholar
[54] 张静, 冯露, 仇巍 张鹏飞 2021 应用力学学报 38 2306
Zhang J, Feng L, Qiu W, Zhang P F 2021 Chin. J. Appl. Mech. 38 2306
[55] Yang S, Lu Y, Liu B, Che Q, Wang F 2023 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 48 12461Google Scholar
[56] Freud L B 1993 J. Cryst. Growth 132 341Google Scholar
[57] 陆勇俊, 杨溢, 王峰会, 楼康, 赵翔 2016 物理学报 65 098102Google Scholar
Lu Y J, Yang Y, Wang F H, Lou K, Zhao X 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 098102Google Scholar
[58] Purkayastha R, McMeeking R 2013 Comput. Mater. Sci. 80 2Google Scholar
[59] Sethuraman V A, Srinivasan V, Bower A F, Guduru P R 2010 J. Electrochem. Soc. 157 A1253Google Scholar
[60] Yang F 2013 J. Power Sources 241 146Google Scholar
[61] Haftbaradaran H, Xiao X, Verbrugge M W, Gao H 2012 J. Power Sources 206 357Google Scholar
[62] Yang F 2011 J. Power Sources 196 465Google Scholar
-
图 4 充电过程中无量纲通量沿活性层厚度方向的分布情况. 扩散和弯曲应力诱导通量 (a) $ \bar t = 0.1 $, (b) $ \bar t = 1.2 $; 总通量 (c) $ \bar t = 0.1 $, (d) $ \bar t = 1.2 $
Figure 4. Distribution of dimensionless flux along the thickness of the active layer under charging. Diffusion and bending stress-induced flux: (a) $ \bar t = 0.1 $; (b) $ \bar t = 1.2 $. Total flux: (c) $ \bar t = 0.1 $; (d) $ \bar t = 1.2 $.
图 5 充电过程中双层电极中无量纲应力沿电极厚度方向的分布情况 (a) $ \bar t = 0.1 $; (b) $ \bar t = 1.2 $. (c)活性层与集流体界面以及(d)活性层表面处无量纲应力随时间的变化情况
Figure 5. Distribution of dimensionless stress along the thickness direction of the bilayer electrode during charging process: (a) $ \bar t = 0.1 $; (b) $ \bar t = 1.2 $. (c) The variation of dimensionless stress over time at the interface between the active layer and the current collector, as well as at (d) the surface of the active layer.
-
[1] Zhang H, Li C M, Eshetu G G, et al. 2020 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 534Google Scholar
[2] Mukhopadhyay A, Sheldon B W 2014 Prog. Mater. Sci. 63 58Google Scholar
[3] 张俊乾, 吕浡, 宋亦诚 2017 力学季刊 38 14
Zhang J Q, Lü B, Song Y C 2017 Chin. Q. Mech. 38 14
[4] Zhao Y, Stein P, Bai Y, Al-Siraj M, Yang Y, Xu B X 2019 J. Power Sources 413 259Google Scholar
[5] de Vasconcelos L S, Xu R, Xu Z, et al. 2022 Chem. Rev. 122 13043Google Scholar
[6] Yang F 2024 J. Energy Storage 75 109634Google Scholar
[7] Haftbaradaran H, Gao H, Curtin W A 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 96 091909Google Scholar
[8] Vanimisetti S K, Ramakrishnan N 2012 Proc. IMechE Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 226 2192Google Scholar
[9] Lu B, Ning C Q, Shi D X, Zhao Y F, Zhang J Q 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 026201Google Scholar
[10] Li J, Dozier A K, Li Y, Yang F, Cheng Y T 2011 J. Electrochem. Soc. 158 A689Google Scholar
[11] Chew H B, Hou B, Wang X, Xia S 2014 Int. J. Solids Struct. 51 4176Google Scholar
[12] Xie H, Zhang Q, Song H, Shi B, Kang Y 2017 J. Power Sources 342 896Google Scholar
[13] Li D, Wang Y, Hu J, Lu B, Cheng Y T, Zhang J 2017 J. Power Sources 366 80Google Scholar
[14] Sethuraman V A, Chon M J, Shimshak M, Srinivasan V, Guduru P R 2010 J. Power Sources 195 5062Google Scholar
[15] Pharr M, Suo Z, Vlassak J J 2013 Nano Lett. 13 5570Google Scholar
[16] Guo Z S, Zhang T, Zhu J, Wang Y 2014 Comput. Mater. Sci. 94 218Google Scholar
[17] 宋旭, 陆勇俊, 石明亮, 赵翔, 王峰会 2018 物理学报 67 140201Google Scholar
Song X, Lu Y J, Shi M L, Zhao X, Wang F H 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 140201Google Scholar
[18] Lu Y, Che Q, Song X, Wang F, Zhao X 2018 Scr. Mater. 150 164Google Scholar
[19] Zhang J, Lu B, Song Y, Ji X 2012 J. Power Sources 209 220Google Scholar
[20] Yang B, He Y P, Irsa J, Lundgren C A, Ratchford J B, Zhao Y P 2012 J. Power Sources 204 168Google Scholar
[21] Hao F, Fang D 2013 J. Power Sources 242 415Google Scholar
[22] Song Y, Shao X, Guo Z, Zhang J 2013 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 46 105307Google Scholar
[23] He Y L, Hu H J, Song Y C, Guo Z S, Liu C, Zhang J Q 2014 J. Power Sources 248 517Google Scholar
[24] Song Y, Li Z, Zhang J 2014 J. Power Sources 263 22Google Scholar
[25] Zhang X Y, Hao F, Chen H S, Fang D N 2015 Mech. Mater. 91 351Google Scholar
[26] Ji L, Guo Z, Du S, Chen L 2017 Int. J. Mech. Sci. 134 599Google Scholar
[27] Liu D, Chen W, Shen X 2017 Compos. Struct. 165 91Google Scholar
[28] Yin J, Shao X, Lu B, Song Y, Zhang J 2018 Appl. Math. Mech. 39 1567Google Scholar
[29] Pouyanmehr R, Hassanzadeh-Aghdam M K, Ansari R 2020 Mech. Mater. 145 103390Google Scholar
[30] Zhang A, Wang B, Li G, Wang J, Du J 2020 Eng. Fract. Mech. 235 107189Google Scholar
[31] Gao C, Guan L, Shi Y, Zhou J, Cai R 2022 Acta Mech. 233 5265Google Scholar
[32] Zhang P, Wang Q, Qiu W, Feng L 2023 J. Electrochem. Soc. 170 050508Google Scholar
[33] Crank J 1979 The Mathematics of Diffusion (London: Oxford University Press) p61
[34] Prussin S 1961 J. Appl. Phys. 32 1876Google Scholar
[35] Zhang X, Shyy W, Sastry A M 2007 J. Electrochem. Soc. 154 A910Google Scholar
[36] He Y, Hu H, Huang D 2016 Mater. Des. 92 438Google Scholar
[37] Xia X, Afshar A, Yang H, Portela C M, Kochmann D M, Di Leo C V, Greer J R 2019 Nature 573 205Google Scholar
[38] Qiu W, Zhang J, Su D, Zhang Y, Zhang P, Wang Q, Feng L 2023 Int. J. Mech. Sci. 248 108231Google Scholar
[39] Berg S, Akturk A, Kammoun M, Ardebili H 2017 Extreme Mech. Lett. 13 108Google Scholar
[40] Shi Y, Xu C, Weng L, Wei Y, Chen B, Wang Y, Zhou J, Cai R 2021 Mech. Mater. 161 104024Google Scholar
[41] Kim S, Choi S J, Zhao K, Yang H, Gobbi G, Zhang S, Li J 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 10146Google Scholar
[42] Johannisson W, Harnden R, Zenkert D, Lindbergh G 2020 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 117 7658Google Scholar
[43] Carlstedt D, Runesson K, Larsson F, Jänicke R, Asp L E 2023 J. Mech. Phys. Solids 179 105371Google Scholar
[44] Zhou W 2015 Electrochim. Acta 185 28Google Scholar
[45] Xuan F Z, Shao S S, Wang Z, Tu S T 2008 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 015401
[46] Zhu Z, Hu H, He Y, Tao B 2018 Compos. Struct. 204 822Google Scholar
[47] Zhu Z, Wan J, Wu T, Huang P 2022 Acta Mech. 233 2471Google Scholar
[48] Song X, Lu Y, Wang F, Zhao X, Chen H 2020 J. Power Sources 452 227803Google Scholar
[49] Peng Y, Hao F 2023 J. Energy Storage 57 106195Google Scholar
[50] Shi Y, Xu C, Chen B, Zhou J, Cai R 2023 Appl. Math. Mech. 44 189Google Scholar
[51] Guan L, Shi Y, Gao C, Wang T, Zhou J, Cai R 2023 Electrochim. Acta 440 141669Google Scholar
[52] Geng S, Zhang K, Zheng B, Zhang Y 2024 Acta Mech. 235 191Google Scholar
[53] Zhuang Y, Zou Z Y, Lu B, Li Y J, Wang D, Avdeev M, Shi S Q 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 068202Google Scholar
[54] 张静, 冯露, 仇巍 张鹏飞 2021 应用力学学报 38 2306
Zhang J, Feng L, Qiu W, Zhang P F 2021 Chin. J. Appl. Mech. 38 2306
[55] Yang S, Lu Y, Liu B, Che Q, Wang F 2023 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 48 12461Google Scholar
[56] Freud L B 1993 J. Cryst. Growth 132 341Google Scholar
[57] 陆勇俊, 杨溢, 王峰会, 楼康, 赵翔 2016 物理学报 65 098102Google Scholar
Lu Y J, Yang Y, Wang F H, Lou K, Zhao X 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 098102Google Scholar
[58] Purkayastha R, McMeeking R 2013 Comput. Mater. Sci. 80 2Google Scholar
[59] Sethuraman V A, Srinivasan V, Bower A F, Guduru P R 2010 J. Electrochem. Soc. 157 A1253Google Scholar
[60] Yang F 2013 J. Power Sources 241 146Google Scholar
[61] Haftbaradaran H, Xiao X, Verbrugge M W, Gao H 2012 J. Power Sources 206 357Google Scholar
[62] Yang F 2011 J. Power Sources 196 465Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 330
- PDF Downloads: 16
- Cited By: 0