搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

AlGaN/GaN高电子迁移率晶体管器件电离辐照损伤机理及偏置相关性研究

董世剑 郭红霞 马武英 吕玲 潘霄宇 雷志锋 岳少忠 郝蕊静 琚安安 钟向丽 欧阳晓平

引用本文:
Citation:

AlGaN/GaN高电子迁移率晶体管器件电离辐照损伤机理及偏置相关性研究

董世剑, 郭红霞, 马武英, 吕玲, 潘霄宇, 雷志锋, 岳少忠, 郝蕊静, 琚安安, 钟向丽, 欧阳晓平

Ionizing radiation damage mechanism and biases correlation of AlGaN/GaN high electron mobility transistor devices

Dong Shi-Jian, Guo Hong-Xia, Ma Wu-Ying, Lv Ling, Pan Xiao-Yu, Lei Zhi-Feng, Yue Shao-Zhong, Hao Rui-Jing, Ju An-An, Zhong Xiang-Li, Ouyang Xiao-Ping
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 本文利用60Co γ射线, 针对AlGaN/GaN高电子迁移率晶体管(high-electron mobility transistors, HEMT)器件, 开展了在不同偏置下器件电离辐照总剂量效应实验研究. 采用1/f噪声结合直流电学特性参数对实验结果进行测量分析, 分析结果表明, 受到辐照诱生氧化物缺陷电荷与界面态的影响, 当辐照总剂量达到1 Mrad(Si)时, 零偏条件下AlGaN/GaN HEMT器件的电学参数退化得最大, 其中, 饱和漏电流减小36.28%, 最高跨导降低52.94%; 基于McWhorter模型提取了AlGaN/GaN HEMT器件辐照前后的缺陷密度, 零偏条件下辐照前后缺陷密度变化最大, 分别为4.080 × 1017和6.621 × 1017 cm–3·eV–1. 其损伤机理是在氧化物层内诱生缺陷电荷和界面态, 使AlGaN/GaN HEMT器件的平带电压噪声功率谱密度增加.
    In this paper, the total dose effect on AlGaN/GaN high-electron-mobility transistor (HEMT) devices after 60Co γ-ray irradiation with a total dose of 1 Mrad(Si) was investigated at different biases (VGS = –3 V, VDS = 0.5 V; VGS = –1.9 V, VDS = 0.5 V; VGS = 0 V, VDS = 0 V). The experimental results were analyzed using 1/f low-frequency noise and direct current electrical characteristics. The electrical parameters degraded mostly under zero bias condition because of the radiation-induced defect charge of the oxide layer and the interface state. Wherein, the saturation drain current was reduced by 36.28%, and the maximum transconductance was reduced by 52.94%. The reason was that the oxide dielectric layer of AlGaN/GaN HEMT devices generated electron-hole pairs under γ-ray irradiation, and most of the electrons were quickly swept out of the oxide region corresponding to the gate-source and gate-drain spacer regions, and most of the holes remained in the oxide. Under the action of the built-in electric field, holes slowly moved towards the interface between the oxide and AlGaN, which depleted the two-dimensional electron gas of the channel.According to the McWhorter model, the low-frequency noise in the AlGaN/GaN HEMT devices results from random fluctuations of carriers, which are caused by the capture and release processes of carriers by traps and defect states in the barrier layer. The extracted defect densities in AlGaN/GaN HEMT devices increased from 4.080 × 1017 cm–3·eV–1 to 6.621 × 1017 cm–3·eV–1 under the condition of zero bias, and the result was in good agreement with test results of the direct currentelectrical characteristics. The damage mechanism was the radiation-induced defect charge in the oxide layer and the interface state, which increased the flat-band voltage noise power spectral density of the AlGaN/GaN HEMT devices. According to the charge tunneling mechanism, the spatial distribution of defect in the barrier layer was extracted, and the result also proved that the densities of radiation-induced defect charges under zero bias were more than the other biases. The experimental results showed that zero bias was the worst bias for AlGaN/GaN HEMT devices irradiation.
      通信作者: 郭红霞, guohxnint@126.com
    • 基金项目: 国家级-国家自然科学基金青年科学基金(No.11435010)
      Corresponding author: Guo Hong-Xia, guohxnint@126.com
    [1]

    周幸叶, 吕元杰, 谭鑫, 王元刚, 宋旭波, 何泽召, 张志荣, 刘庆彬, 韩婷婷, 房玉龙, 冯志红 2018 物理学报 67 178501Google Scholar

    Zhou X Y, Lv Y J, Tan X, Wang Y G, Song X B, He Z Z, Zhang Z R, Liu Q B, Han T T, Fang Y L, Feng Z H 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 178501Google Scholar

    [2]

    Vurgaftman I, Meyer J R, Ram-Mohan L R 2001 J. Appl. Phys. 89 5815Google Scholar

    [3]

    Meneghesso G, Verzellesi G, Rampazzo F, Zanon F, Tazzoli A, Meneghini M, Zanoni E 2008 IEEE Trans. Device Mater. Reliab. 8 332Google Scholar

    [4]

    Gong J M, Wang Q, Yan J D, Liu F Q, Feng C, Wang X L, Wang Z G 2016 Chin. Phys. Lett. 33 117303Google Scholar

    [5]

    Wu H, Duan B X, Yang L Y, Yang Y T 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 027302Google Scholar

    [6]

    Zhang L, Lester L F, Baca A G, Shul R J, Chang P C, Willison C G, Mishra U K, Denbaars S P, Zolper J C 2000 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 47 507Google Scholar

    [7]

    Jayarman R, Sodini C G 1989 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 36 1773Google Scholar

    [8]

    Fleetwood D M, Shaneyfelt M R, Schwank J R 1994 Appl. Phys. Lett. 64 1965Google Scholar

    [9]

    王凯, 刘远, 陈海波, 邓婉玲, 恩云飞, 张平 2015 物理学报 64 108501Google Scholar

    Wang K, Liu Y, Chen H B, Deng W L, En Y F, Zhang P 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 108501Google Scholar

    [10]

    刘远, 陈海波, 何玉娟, 王信, 岳龙, 恩云飞, 刘默寒 2015 物理学报 64 078501Google Scholar

    Liu Y, Chen H B, He Y J, Wang X, Yue L, En Y F, Liu M H 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 078501Google Scholar

    [11]

    孙鹏, 杜磊, 何亮, 陈文豪, 刘玉栋, 赵瑛 2012 物理学报 61 127808Google Scholar

    Sun P, Du L, He L, Chen W H, Liu Y D, Zhao Y 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 127808Google Scholar

    [12]

    刘远, 吴为敬, 李斌, 恩云飞, 王磊, 刘玉荣 2014 物理学报 63 098503Google Scholar

    Liu Y, Wu W J, Li B, En Y F, Wang L, Liu Y R 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 098503Google Scholar

    [13]

    Fung T C, Baek G, Kanicki J 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 074518Google Scholar

    [14]

    Zheng X, Feng S W, Peng C, Lin G, Bai L, Li X, Yang Y, Pan S J, Hu Z X, Li X Y, Zhang Y M 2019 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 66 3784Google Scholar

    [15]

    Smith M D, O’Mahony D, Vitobello F, Muschitiello M, Costantino A, Barnes A R, Parbrook P J 2016 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 31 025008Google Scholar

    [16]

    Bhuiyan M A, Zhou H, Chang S J, Lou X B, Gong X, Jiang R, Gong H Q, Zhang E X, Won C H, Lim J W, Lee J H, Gordon R G, Reed R A, Fleetwood D M, Ye P D, Ma T P 2017 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 65 46Google Scholar

    [17]

    Choi H S, Jeon S, Kim H, Shin J, Kim C, Chung U I 2011 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 32 1083Google Scholar

    [18]

    Rashmi A, Kranti S, Haldar, Gupta R S 2002 Solid State Electron. 46 621Google Scholar

    [19]

    谷文萍, 张进城, 王冲, 冯倩, 马晓华, 郝跃 2009 物理学报 58 1161Google Scholar

    Gu W P, Zhang J C, Wang C, Feng Q, Ma X H, Hao Y 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 1161Google Scholar

    [20]

    吕玲 2013 博士学位论文 (西安: 西安电子科技大学)

    Lü L 2013 Ph. D. Dissertation (Xi’an: Xidian University) (in Chinese)

    [21]

    Hooge F N 1994 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 41 1926Google Scholar

    [22]

    Simoen E, Mercha A, Claeys C, Lukyanchikova N 2007 Solid State Electron. 51 16Google Scholar

    [23]

    Jomaah J, Balestra 2004 IEE Proc. Circuits Devices Syst. 151 111Google Scholar

    [24]

    Liu Y, Wu W J, En Y F, Wang L, Lei Z F, Wang X H 2014 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 35 369Google Scholar

    [25]

    Ioannidis E G, Tsormpatzoglou A, Tassis D H, Dimitriadis C A, Templier F, Kamarinos G 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 106103Google Scholar

    [26]

    Ghibaudo G, Roux O, Nguyen-Duc C, Balestra F, Brini J 1991 Phys. Status Solidi A 124 571Google Scholar

    [27]

    Christensson S, Lundstrom I, Svensson C 1968 Solid State Electron. 11 797Google Scholar

    [28]

    Rahal M, Lee M, Burdett A P 2002 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 49 319Google Scholar

  • 图 1  AlGaN/GaN HEMT器件的剖面图

    Fig. 1.  AlGaN/GaN HEMT devices’ cross-section.

    图 2  AlGaN/GaN HEMT器件的低频噪声测量系统[17]

    Fig. 2.  AlGaN/GaN HEMT devices’ low frequency noise measurement system.

    图 3  零偏下AlGaN/GaN HEMT器件辐照前后输出特性曲线(a)与转移特性曲线(b)

    Fig. 3.  The output characteristic curve (a) and transfer characteristic curve (b) of the AlGaN/GaN HEMT device before and after irradiation under the zero-bias.

    图 4  AlGaN/GaN HEMT器件辐照时的电荷分布图 (a)关态和半开态; (b)零偏

    Fig. 4.  Charge distribution patterns of AlGaN/GaN HEMT devices: (a) The off and semi-on states; (b) zero-bias.

    图 5  AlGaN/GaN HEMT器件辐照前后沟道电流归一化噪声功率谱密度 (a)关态; (b)半开态; (c)零偏

    Fig. 5.  Normalized channel current noise power spectral density in the AlGaN/GaN HEMT devices before and after irradiation: (a) OFF state; (b) SEMI-ON state; (c) zero-bias.

    图 6  AlGaN/GaN HEMT器件辐照前后沟道电流归一化噪声功率谱密度随过驱动电压的变化(点: 测量值; 实线: 拟合值) (a)关态; (b)半开态; (c)零偏

    Fig. 6.  Normalized channel current noise power spectral density versus overdrive voltage in the AlGaN/GaN HEMT devices before and after irradiation: (a) OFF state; (b) SEMI-ON state; (c) zero-bias (dot: measured value; continuous line: fitted value).

    图 7  AlGaN/GaN HEMT器件辐照前后沟道电流归一化噪声功率谱密度随沟道电流的变化(f = 25 Hz, 点: 测量值; 实线: 拟合值) (a)关态; (b); 半开态; (c)零偏

    Fig. 7.  Normalized channel current noise power spectral density versus channel current in the AlGaN/GaN HEMT devices before and after irradiation: (a) OFF state; (b) SEMI-ON state; (c) zero-bias (f = 25 Hz, dot: measured value; continuous line: fitted value).

    图 8  AlGaN/GaN HEMT器件辐照前后势垒层内陷阱电荷密度的空间分布 (a)关态; (b)半开态; (c)零偏

    Fig. 8.  Extracted spatial distribution of trapped charges in the AlGaN/GaN HEMT devices’ barrier layer: (a) OFF state; (b) SEMI-ON state; (c) zero-bias.

    表 1  AlGaN/GaN HEMT器件辐照实验偏置设置

    Table 1.  The biases set of AlGaN/GaN HEMT device irradiation experiment.

    VGS/VVDS/V
    关态(OFF)–3.00.5
    半开态(SEMI-ON)–1.90.5
    零偏(zero-bias)00
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  不同偏置下AlGaN/GaN HEMT器件辐照前后饱和漏电流与最高跨导的变化

    Table 2.  Variation of saturation drain current and maximum transconductance before and after irradiation in AlGaN/GaNHEMT devices with different biases.

    关态(OFF)半开(SEMI-ON)零偏(zero-bias)
    ΔIDSsat/%–26.00–31.42–36.28
    Δgmmax/%–22.86–34.58–52.94
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  不同偏置下AlGaN/GaN HEMT器件辐照前后平带电压噪声功率谱密度(单位: V2·Hz–1)

    Table 3.  Flat-band voltage noise power spectral density in the AlGaN/GaN HEMT devices before and after irradiation under different biases (in V2·Hz–1).

    关态
    (OFF)
    半开态
    (SEMI-ON)
    零偏
    (zero-bias)
    0 rad(Si)3.20 × 10–142.65 × 10–143.18 × 10–14
    1 Mrad(Si)4.21 × 10–143.85 × 10–145.16 × 10–14
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 4  不同偏置下AlGaN/GaN HEMT器件辐照前后缺陷密度(单位: cm–3·eV–1)

    Table 4.  The defect density in the AlGaN/GaN HEMT devices before and after irradiation under different biases (in cm–3·eV–1).

    关态
    (OFF)
    半开态
    (SEMI-ON)
    零偏
    (zero-bias)
    0 rad(Si)4.106 × 10173.400 × 10174.080 × 1017
    1 Mrad(Si)5.402 × 10174.940 × 10176.621 × 1017
    ΔNt/%31.5645.2962.28
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    周幸叶, 吕元杰, 谭鑫, 王元刚, 宋旭波, 何泽召, 张志荣, 刘庆彬, 韩婷婷, 房玉龙, 冯志红 2018 物理学报 67 178501Google Scholar

    Zhou X Y, Lv Y J, Tan X, Wang Y G, Song X B, He Z Z, Zhang Z R, Liu Q B, Han T T, Fang Y L, Feng Z H 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 178501Google Scholar

    [2]

    Vurgaftman I, Meyer J R, Ram-Mohan L R 2001 J. Appl. Phys. 89 5815Google Scholar

    [3]

    Meneghesso G, Verzellesi G, Rampazzo F, Zanon F, Tazzoli A, Meneghini M, Zanoni E 2008 IEEE Trans. Device Mater. Reliab. 8 332Google Scholar

    [4]

    Gong J M, Wang Q, Yan J D, Liu F Q, Feng C, Wang X L, Wang Z G 2016 Chin. Phys. Lett. 33 117303Google Scholar

    [5]

    Wu H, Duan B X, Yang L Y, Yang Y T 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 027302Google Scholar

    [6]

    Zhang L, Lester L F, Baca A G, Shul R J, Chang P C, Willison C G, Mishra U K, Denbaars S P, Zolper J C 2000 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 47 507Google Scholar

    [7]

    Jayarman R, Sodini C G 1989 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 36 1773Google Scholar

    [8]

    Fleetwood D M, Shaneyfelt M R, Schwank J R 1994 Appl. Phys. Lett. 64 1965Google Scholar

    [9]

    王凯, 刘远, 陈海波, 邓婉玲, 恩云飞, 张平 2015 物理学报 64 108501Google Scholar

    Wang K, Liu Y, Chen H B, Deng W L, En Y F, Zhang P 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 108501Google Scholar

    [10]

    刘远, 陈海波, 何玉娟, 王信, 岳龙, 恩云飞, 刘默寒 2015 物理学报 64 078501Google Scholar

    Liu Y, Chen H B, He Y J, Wang X, Yue L, En Y F, Liu M H 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 078501Google Scholar

    [11]

    孙鹏, 杜磊, 何亮, 陈文豪, 刘玉栋, 赵瑛 2012 物理学报 61 127808Google Scholar

    Sun P, Du L, He L, Chen W H, Liu Y D, Zhao Y 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 127808Google Scholar

    [12]

    刘远, 吴为敬, 李斌, 恩云飞, 王磊, 刘玉荣 2014 物理学报 63 098503Google Scholar

    Liu Y, Wu W J, Li B, En Y F, Wang L, Liu Y R 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 098503Google Scholar

    [13]

    Fung T C, Baek G, Kanicki J 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 074518Google Scholar

    [14]

    Zheng X, Feng S W, Peng C, Lin G, Bai L, Li X, Yang Y, Pan S J, Hu Z X, Li X Y, Zhang Y M 2019 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 66 3784Google Scholar

    [15]

    Smith M D, O’Mahony D, Vitobello F, Muschitiello M, Costantino A, Barnes A R, Parbrook P J 2016 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 31 025008Google Scholar

    [16]

    Bhuiyan M A, Zhou H, Chang S J, Lou X B, Gong X, Jiang R, Gong H Q, Zhang E X, Won C H, Lim J W, Lee J H, Gordon R G, Reed R A, Fleetwood D M, Ye P D, Ma T P 2017 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 65 46Google Scholar

    [17]

    Choi H S, Jeon S, Kim H, Shin J, Kim C, Chung U I 2011 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 32 1083Google Scholar

    [18]

    Rashmi A, Kranti S, Haldar, Gupta R S 2002 Solid State Electron. 46 621Google Scholar

    [19]

    谷文萍, 张进城, 王冲, 冯倩, 马晓华, 郝跃 2009 物理学报 58 1161Google Scholar

    Gu W P, Zhang J C, Wang C, Feng Q, Ma X H, Hao Y 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 1161Google Scholar

    [20]

    吕玲 2013 博士学位论文 (西安: 西安电子科技大学)

    Lü L 2013 Ph. D. Dissertation (Xi’an: Xidian University) (in Chinese)

    [21]

    Hooge F N 1994 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 41 1926Google Scholar

    [22]

    Simoen E, Mercha A, Claeys C, Lukyanchikova N 2007 Solid State Electron. 51 16Google Scholar

    [23]

    Jomaah J, Balestra 2004 IEE Proc. Circuits Devices Syst. 151 111Google Scholar

    [24]

    Liu Y, Wu W J, En Y F, Wang L, Lei Z F, Wang X H 2014 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 35 369Google Scholar

    [25]

    Ioannidis E G, Tsormpatzoglou A, Tassis D H, Dimitriadis C A, Templier F, Kamarinos G 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 106103Google Scholar

    [26]

    Ghibaudo G, Roux O, Nguyen-Duc C, Balestra F, Brini J 1991 Phys. Status Solidi A 124 571Google Scholar

    [27]

    Christensson S, Lundstrom I, Svensson C 1968 Solid State Electron. 11 797Google Scholar

    [28]

    Rahal M, Lee M, Burdett A P 2002 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 49 319Google Scholar

  • [1] 吕玲, 邢木涵, 薛博瑞, 曹艳荣, 胡培培, 郑雪峰, 马晓华, 郝跃. 重离子辐射对AlGaN/GaN高电子迁移率晶体管低频噪声特性的影响. 物理学报, 2024, 73(3): 036103. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20221360
    [2] 武鹏, 李若晗, 张涛, 张进成, 郝跃. AlGaN/GaN肖特基二极管阳极后退火界面态修复技术. 物理学报, 2023, 72(19): 198501. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230553
    [3] 刘乃漳, 姚若河, 耿魁伟. AlGaN/GaN高电子迁移率晶体管的栅极电容模型. 物理学报, 2021, 70(21): 217301. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210700
    [4] 刘旭阳, 张贺秋, 李冰冰, 刘俊, 薛东阳, 王恒山, 梁红伟, 夏晓川. AlGaN/GaN高电子迁移率晶体管温度传感器特性. 物理学报, 2020, 69(4): 047201. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20190640
    [5] 郝蕊静, 郭红霞, 潘霄宇, 吕玲, 雷志锋, 李波, 钟向丽, 欧阳晓平, 董世剑. AlGaN/GaN高电子迁移率晶体管器件中子位移损伤效应及机理. 物理学报, 2020, 69(20): 207301. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200714
    [6] 刘燕丽, 王伟, 董燕, 陈敦军, 张荣, 郑有炓. 结构参数对N极性面GaN/InAlN高电子迁移率晶体管性能的影响. 物理学报, 2019, 68(24): 247203. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20191153
    [7] 刘静, 王琳倩, 黄忠孝. 基于凹槽结构抑制AlGaN/GaN高电子迁移率晶体管电流崩塌效应. 物理学报, 2019, 68(24): 248501. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20191311
    [8] 周幸叶, 吕元杰, 谭鑫, 王元刚, 宋旭波, 何泽召, 张志荣, 刘庆彬, 韩婷婷, 房玉龙, 冯志红. 基于脉冲方法的超短栅长GaN基高电子迁移率晶体管陷阱效应机理. 物理学报, 2018, 67(17): 178501. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180474
    [9] 唐文昕, 郝荣晖, 陈扶, 于国浩, 张宝顺. 1000 V p-GaN混合阳极AlGaN/GaN二极管. 物理学报, 2018, 67(19): 198501. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20181208
    [10] 郭海君, 段宝兴, 袁嵩, 谢慎隆, 杨银堂. 具有部分本征GaN帽层新型AlGaN/GaN高电子迁移率晶体管特性分析. 物理学报, 2017, 66(16): 167301. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.167301
    [11] 张力, 林志宇, 罗俊, 王树龙, 张进成, 郝跃, 戴扬, 陈大正, 郭立新. 具有p-GaN岛状埋层耐压结构的横向AlGaN/GaN高电子迁移率晶体管. 物理学报, 2017, 66(24): 247302. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.247302
    [12] 王凯, 邢艳辉, 韩军, 赵康康, 郭立建, 于保宁, 邓旭光, 范亚明, 张宝顺. 掺Fe高阻GaN缓冲层特性及其对AlGaN/GaN高电子迁移率晶体管器件的影响研究. 物理学报, 2016, 65(1): 016802. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.016802
    [13] 刘阳, 柴常春, 于新海, 樊庆扬, 杨银堂, 席晓文, 刘胜北. GaN高电子迁移率晶体管强电磁脉冲损伤效应与机理. 物理学报, 2016, 65(3): 038402. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.038402
    [14] 任舰, 闫大为, 顾晓峰. AlGaN/GaN 高电子迁移率晶体管漏电流退化机理研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(15): 157202. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.157202
    [15] 段宝兴, 杨银堂, 陈敬. F离子注入新型Al0.25Ga0.75 N/GaN HEMT 器件耐压分析. 物理学报, 2012, 61(22): 227302. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.227302
    [16] 马骥刚, 马晓华, 张会龙, 曹梦逸, 张凯, 李文雯, 郭星, 廖雪阳, 陈伟伟, 郝跃. AlGaN/GaN高电子迁移率晶体管中kink效应的半经验模型. 物理学报, 2012, 61(4): 047301. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.047301
    [17] 王冲, 全思, 马晓华, 郝跃, 张进城, 毛维. 增强型AlGaN/GaN高电子迁移率晶体管高温退火研究. 物理学报, 2010, 59(10): 7333-7337. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.7333
    [18] 王冲, 全思, 张金凤, 郝跃, 冯倩, 陈军峰. AlGaN/GaN槽栅HEMT模拟与实验研究. 物理学报, 2009, 58(3): 1966-1970. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.1966
    [19] 魏 巍, 郝 跃, 冯 倩, 张进城, 张金凤. AlGaN/GaN场板结构高电子迁移率晶体管的场板尺寸优化分析. 物理学报, 2008, 57(4): 2456-2461. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.2456
    [20] 郭亮良, 冯 倩, 郝 跃, 杨 燕. 高击穿电压的AlGaN/GaN FP-HEMT研究与分析. 物理学报, 2007, 56(5): 2895-2899. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.2895
计量
  • 文章访问数:  8550
  • PDF下载量:  189
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-10-12
  • 修回日期:  2020-01-07
  • 刊出日期:  2020-04-05

/

返回文章
返回