-
采用分子动力学方法模拟研究了不同温度下bcc-Fe中螺位错滑移行为和螺位错与½[
$11\bar 1$ ]位错环相互作用机制. 结果表明, 螺位错在低温2 K剪切应力下主要沿($\bar 2 11$ )面滑移; 随温度逐渐升高到823 K, 它容易发生交滑移, 该交滑移在($\bar 1 10$ )和($\bar 2 11$ )面之间交替进行, 因此随温度升高, 临界剪切应力逐渐降低. 当螺位错滑移靠近位错环时, 不同温度下螺位错与位错环相互作用机制不同: 低温2 K时, 螺位错与位错环之间存在斥力作用, 当螺位错滑移靠近位错环过程中, 螺位错发生交滑移, 切应力比无位错环时有所降低; 中温300 K和600 K时, 螺位错与位错环间斥力对螺位错的滑移影响减弱, 螺位错会滑移通过位错环并与之形成螺旋结构, 阻碍螺位错继续滑移, 切应力有所升高; 高温823 K时, 螺位错因热激活更易发生交滑移, 位错环也会滑移, 两者在整个剪切过程中不接触, 剪切应力最低.Reduced activation ferritic/martensitic (RAFM) steel, as a typical body centered cubic (bcc) iron based structure material, has become a candidate material for future fusion reactor. Nano-scale prismatic interstitial dislocation loops formed in irradiated RAFM have been studied for many years because of their significant influences on the mechanical properties (e.g. irradiation embrittlement, hardening, creep, etc.). Compared with edge dislocation, screw dislocation has very important influence on plastic deformation behavior because of its low mobility. Thus, the mechanism of interaction between screw dislocation and interstitial dislocation loops has become an intense research topic of interest. In this study, the slip behavior of screw dislocation and the mechanisms of interaction between screw dislocation and ½[$11\bar 1$ ] dislocation loop in bcc-Fe at different temperatures are investigated by molecular dynamics simulation. The results show that the screw dislocation mainly slides along the ($\bar 2 11$ ) plane at a low temperature of 2 K under the increase of shear stress. With the temperature increasing to 823 K, it is prone to cross slip, and then the cross slip occurs alternately in the ($\bar 1 10$ ) plane and the ($\bar 2 11$ ) plane. Therefore, with the increase of temperature, the critical shear stress decreases gradually. When the screw dislocation slips close to the dislocation loop, the mechanism of interaction between screw dislocation and dislocation loop is different at different temperature: at low temperature of 2 K, there is repulsive force between screw dislocation and dislocation loop, when screw dislocation slip approaches to the dislocation loop, the cross slip of screw dislocation can occur, and shear stress is lower than that from the model without dislocation loop; at medium temperatures of 300 K and 600 K, the influence of repulsive force on the cross slip of screw dislocation can be weakened, and screw dislocation will slip through the dislocation loop then form the new structure named helix turn, which further hinders screw dislocation slipping and results in the increase of shear stress; at a high temperature of 823 K, the screw dislocation is more likely to cross slip due to the thermal activation, and the slip of dislocation loop is also easier to occur, but the screw dislocation and the dislocation loop do not contact each other in the whole shearing process, therefore the shear stress is lowest.-
Keywords:
- bcc-Fe /
- screw dislocation /
- dislocation loop /
- molecular dynamics
[1] Ullmaier H 1984 Nucl. Fusion 24 1039
Google Scholar
[2] Sokolov M A, Tanigawa H, Odette G R, Shiba K, Klueh R L 2007 J. Nucl. Mater. 367 68
Google Scholar
[3] Dai Y, Long B, Tong Z F 2008 J. Nucl. Mater. 377 115
Google Scholar
[4] Hardie C D, Williams C A, Xu S, Roberts S G 2013 J. Nucl. Mater. 439 33
Google Scholar
[5] Suganuma K, Kayano H 1983 J. Nucl. Mater. 118 234
Google Scholar
[6] Terentyev D, Haghighat S M H, Schaublin R 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 107 55
Google Scholar
[7] 贾丽霞, 贺新福, 豆艳坤, 吴石, 王东杰, 杨文 2017 核动力工程 38 115
Google Scholar
Jia L X, He X F, Dou Y K, Wu S, Wang D J, Yang Wen 2017 Nuclear Power Engineering 38 115
Google Scholar
[8] Wang Y X, Xu Q, Yoshiie T, Pan Z Y 2008 J. Nucl. Mater. 376 133
Google Scholar
[9] Osetsky Y N, Stoller R E 2015 J. Nucl. Mater. 465 448
Google Scholar
[10] Yang L, Zhu Z Q, Peng S M, Long X G, Zhou X S, Zu X T, Heinisch H L, Kurtz R J, Gao F 2013 J. Nucl. Mater. 441 6
Google Scholar
[11] Terentyev D, Bergner F, Osetsky Y 2013 Acta Mater. 61 1444
Google Scholar
[12] Rong Z, Osetsky Y N, Bacon D J 2005 Philos. Mag. 85 1473
Google Scholar
[13] Jia L X, He X F, Dou Y K, Wang D J, Wu S, Cao H, Yang W 2019 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 456 103
Google Scholar
[14] Liu X Y, Biner S B 2008 Scripta Mater. 59 51
Google Scholar
[15] Hale L M, Zimmerman J A, Weinberger C R 2014 Comput. Mater. Sci. 90 106
Google Scholar
[16] Yang L, Gao F, Kurtz R J, Zu X T 2015 Acta Mater. 82 275
Google Scholar
[17] Zhang L, Fu C C, Hayward E, Lu G H 2015 J. Nucl. Mater. 459 247
Google Scholar
[18] Martinez E, Schwen D, Caro A 2015 Acta Mater. 84 208
Google Scholar
[19] Zhurkin E E, Terentyev D, Hou M, Malerba L, Bonny G 2011 J. Nucl. Mater. 417 1082
Google Scholar
[20] Wakai E, Hishinuma A, Kato Y, Yano H, Takaki S, Abiko K 1995 J. Phys. IV France 5 C7-277
Google Scholar
[21] Xu H X, Stoller R E, Osetsky Y N, Terentyev D 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 265503
Google Scholar
[22] Terentyev D, Bacon D J, Osetsky Y N 2010 Philos. Mag. 90 1019
Google Scholar
[23] Pascale E T, Shehadeh M A 2018 Int. J. Plasticity 9 2
Google Scholar
[24] Song G, Lee S W 2019 Comput. Mater. Sci. 168 172
Google Scholar
[25] Xia Z Y, Zhang Z J, Yan J X, Yang J B, Zhang Z F 2020 Comput. Mater. Sci. 174 109503
Google Scholar
[26] LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator http://lammps. sandia.gov/ [2020-10-7]
[27] Caro A, Hetherly J, Stukowski A, Caro M, Martinez E, Srivilliputhur S, Zepeda-Ruiz L, Nastasi M 2011 J. Nucl. Mater. 418 261
Google Scholar
[28] Stukowski A 2010 Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18 015012
Google Scholar
[29] Gordon P A, Neeraj T, Li Y, Li J 2010 Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18 085008
Google Scholar
[30] Jaime M, Wei C, Vasily V B 2004 Nature Mater. 3 158
Google Scholar
[31] Bacon D J, Osetsky Y N, Rong Z 2006 Philos. Mag. 86 3921
Google Scholar
-
图 1 (a)螺位错模型和(b)含½[
$11\bar 1$ ]位错环的螺位错模型Fig. 1. (a) Model of screw dislocation; (b) model of screw dislocation with ½[
$11\bar 1 $ ] dislocation loop.
图 2 不同温度下螺位错及其与½[
$11\bar 1$ ]位错环模型切应力-应变曲线Fig. 2. Shear stress-strain (τ-ε) curves of screw dislocation model with and without ½[
$11\bar 1$ ] loop under different temperatures.
图 3 随应变量增加的螺位错模型构型图 (a) ε = 0; (b) ε = 0.03; (c) ε = 0.048; (d) ε = 0.058; (e) ε = 0.068; (f) ε = 0.075
Fig. 3. Configurations of screw dislocation model with increasing strain: (a) ε = 0; (b) ε = 0.03; (c) ε = 0.048; (d) ε = 0.058; (e) ε = 0.068; (f) ε = 0.075.
图 4 不同温度下螺位错模型在ε = 0.03 (a), (b), (c)和0.045 (d), (e), (f)时的构型图 (a), (d) 300 K; (b), (e) 600 K; (c), (f) 823 K
Fig. 4. Configurations of screw dislocation model when ε = 0.03 (a), (b), (c) and 0.045 (d), (e), (f) under different temperatures: (a), (d) 300 K; (b), (e) 600 K; (c), (f) 823 K.
图 5 2 K下随应变量增加含位错环的螺位错模型构型图 (a) ε = 0.015; (b) ε = 0.03; (c) ε = 0.06
Fig. 5. Configurations of screw dislocation model with dislocation loop with increasing strain at 2 K: (a) ε = 0.015; (b) ε = 0.03; (c) ε = 0.06.
图 6 不同温度下含位错环的螺位错模型在 ε = 0.015 (a), (d), 0.03 (b), (e)和0.045 (c), (f)时构型图 (a), (b), (c) 300 K; (d), (e), (f) 600 K
Fig. 6. Configurations of screw dislocation model with dislocation loop when ε = 0.015 (a), (d), 0.03 (b), (e), and 0.045 (c), (f) under different temperatures: (a), (b), (c) 300 K; (d), (e), (f) 600 K.
-
[1] Ullmaier H 1984 Nucl. Fusion 24 1039
Google Scholar
[2] Sokolov M A, Tanigawa H, Odette G R, Shiba K, Klueh R L 2007 J. Nucl. Mater. 367 68
Google Scholar
[3] Dai Y, Long B, Tong Z F 2008 J. Nucl. Mater. 377 115
Google Scholar
[4] Hardie C D, Williams C A, Xu S, Roberts S G 2013 J. Nucl. Mater. 439 33
Google Scholar
[5] Suganuma K, Kayano H 1983 J. Nucl. Mater. 118 234
Google Scholar
[6] Terentyev D, Haghighat S M H, Schaublin R 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 107 55
Google Scholar
[7] 贾丽霞, 贺新福, 豆艳坤, 吴石, 王东杰, 杨文 2017 核动力工程 38 115
Google Scholar
Jia L X, He X F, Dou Y K, Wu S, Wang D J, Yang Wen 2017 Nuclear Power Engineering 38 115
Google Scholar
[8] Wang Y X, Xu Q, Yoshiie T, Pan Z Y 2008 J. Nucl. Mater. 376 133
Google Scholar
[9] Osetsky Y N, Stoller R E 2015 J. Nucl. Mater. 465 448
Google Scholar
[10] Yang L, Zhu Z Q, Peng S M, Long X G, Zhou X S, Zu X T, Heinisch H L, Kurtz R J, Gao F 2013 J. Nucl. Mater. 441 6
Google Scholar
[11] Terentyev D, Bergner F, Osetsky Y 2013 Acta Mater. 61 1444
Google Scholar
[12] Rong Z, Osetsky Y N, Bacon D J 2005 Philos. Mag. 85 1473
Google Scholar
[13] Jia L X, He X F, Dou Y K, Wang D J, Wu S, Cao H, Yang W 2019 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 456 103
Google Scholar
[14] Liu X Y, Biner S B 2008 Scripta Mater. 59 51
Google Scholar
[15] Hale L M, Zimmerman J A, Weinberger C R 2014 Comput. Mater. Sci. 90 106
Google Scholar
[16] Yang L, Gao F, Kurtz R J, Zu X T 2015 Acta Mater. 82 275
Google Scholar
[17] Zhang L, Fu C C, Hayward E, Lu G H 2015 J. Nucl. Mater. 459 247
Google Scholar
[18] Martinez E, Schwen D, Caro A 2015 Acta Mater. 84 208
Google Scholar
[19] Zhurkin E E, Terentyev D, Hou M, Malerba L, Bonny G 2011 J. Nucl. Mater. 417 1082
Google Scholar
[20] Wakai E, Hishinuma A, Kato Y, Yano H, Takaki S, Abiko K 1995 J. Phys. IV France 5 C7-277
Google Scholar
[21] Xu H X, Stoller R E, Osetsky Y N, Terentyev D 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 265503
Google Scholar
[22] Terentyev D, Bacon D J, Osetsky Y N 2010 Philos. Mag. 90 1019
Google Scholar
[23] Pascale E T, Shehadeh M A 2018 Int. J. Plasticity 9 2
Google Scholar
[24] Song G, Lee S W 2019 Comput. Mater. Sci. 168 172
Google Scholar
[25] Xia Z Y, Zhang Z J, Yan J X, Yang J B, Zhang Z F 2020 Comput. Mater. Sci. 174 109503
Google Scholar
[26] LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator http://lammps. sandia.gov/ [2020-10-7]
[27] Caro A, Hetherly J, Stukowski A, Caro M, Martinez E, Srivilliputhur S, Zepeda-Ruiz L, Nastasi M 2011 J. Nucl. Mater. 418 261
Google Scholar
[28] Stukowski A 2010 Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18 015012
Google Scholar
[29] Gordon P A, Neeraj T, Li Y, Li J 2010 Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18 085008
Google Scholar
[30] Jaime M, Wei C, Vasily V B 2004 Nature Mater. 3 158
Google Scholar
[31] Bacon D J, Osetsky Y N, Rong Z 2006 Philos. Mag. 86 3921
Google Scholar
-
[1] 汪淑敏, 贺新福, 豆艳坤. 纯V和TiVTa合金中刃位错运动及其与位错环之间相互作用的模拟研究. 物理学报, 2025, 74(7): 078101. doi: 10.7498/aps.74.20241757 [2] 赵永鹏, 豆艳坤, 贺新福, 杨文. Ti-V-Ta多主元合金辐照位错环形成的级联重叠模拟. 物理学报, 2024, 73(22): 226102. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20241074 [3] 徐驰, 万发荣. 聚变材料钨辐照后退火形成的位错环特性及inside-outside衬度分析. 物理学报, 2023, 72(5): 056801. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222124 [4] 秦梦飞, 王英敏, 张红玉, 孙继忠. 〈100〉 间隙型位错环在纯钨及含氦杂质钨(010)表面下运动行为的分子动力学模拟. 物理学报, 2023, 72(24): 245204. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230651[5] 王胜, 陈晶晶, 翁盛槟. 纳米孪晶界对可动位错演化特性与金属Al强化机理探究. 物理学报, 2022, 71(2): 029601. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211305 [6] 李然然, 张一帆, 殷玉鹏, 渡边英雄, 韩文妥, 易晓鸥, 刘平平, 张高伟, 詹倩, 万发荣. 注氢纯铝中间隙型位错环一维迁移现象的原位观察. 物理学报, 2022, 71(1): 016102. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211229 [7] 周良付, 张婧, 何文豪, 王栋, 苏雪, 杨冬燕, 李玉红. 氦泡在bcc钨中晶界处成核长大的分子动力学模拟. 物理学报, 2020, 69(4): 046103. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191069 [8] 朱琪, 王升涛, 赵福祺, 潘昊. 层错四面体对单晶铜层裂行为影响的分子动力学研究. 物理学报, 2020, 69(3): 036201. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191425 [9] 梁晋洁, 高宁, 李玉红. 表面效应对铁 ${\left\langle 100 \right\rangle} $ 间隙型位错环的影响. 物理学报, 2020, 69(3): 036101. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191379[10] 梁晋洁, 高宁, 李玉红. 体心立方Fe中 ${ \langle 100 \rangle}$ 位错环对微裂纹扩展影响的分子动力学研究. 物理学报, 2020, 69(11): 116102. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200317[11] 崔丽娟, 高进, 杜玉峰, 张高伟, 张磊, 龙毅, 杨善武, 詹倩, 万发荣. 氢离子辐照纯钒中形成的位错环. 物理学报, 2016, 65(6): 066102. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.066102 [12] 高雪云, 王海燕, 李春龙, 任慧平, 李德超, 刘宗昌. 稀土La对bcc-Fe中Cu扩散行为影响的第一性原理研究. 物理学报, 2014, 63(24): 248101. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.248101 [13] 唐翠明, 赵锋, 陈晓旭, 陈华君, 程新路. Al与α-Fe2O3纳米界面铝热反应的从头计算分子动力学研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(24): 247101. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.247101 [14] 吴文平, 郭雅芳, 汪越胜, 徐爽. 镍基单晶高温合金界面位错网在剪切载荷作用下的演化. 物理学报, 2011, 60(5): 056802. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.056802 [15] 朱弢, 王崇愚, 干勇. 镍基单晶高温合金相界面错配位错网络的演化. 物理学报, 2009, 58(13): 156-S160. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.156 [16] 卢果, 方步青, 张广财, 许爱国. 有限温度下位错环的脱体现象. 物理学报, 2009, 58(11): 7934-7946. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.7934 [17] 周耐根, 周 浪. 采用纳米晶柱阵列衬底抑制失配位错形成的分子动力学模拟研究. 物理学报, 2008, 57(5): 3064-3070. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.3064 [18] 周耐根, 周 浪, 杜丹旭. 面心立方晶体外延膜沉积生长中失配位错的结构与形成过程. 物理学报, 2006, 55(1): 372-377. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.372 [19] 张 超, 王永亮, 颜 超, 张庆瑜. 替位杂质对低能Pt原子与Pt(111)表面相互作用影响的分子动力学模拟. 物理学报, 2006, 55(6): 2882-2891. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.2882 [20] 周耐根, 周 浪. 外延生长薄膜中失配位错形成条件的分子动力学模拟研究. 物理学报, 2005, 54(7): 3278-3283. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.3278
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 9448
- PDF下载量: 212
- 被引次数: 0
