搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

一种突触可塑性导致的觉醒-睡眠周期中突触强度变化和神经动力学转变

李瑞 徐邦林 周建芳 姜恩华 汪秉宏 袁五届

引用本文:
Citation:

一种突触可塑性导致的觉醒-睡眠周期中突触强度变化和神经动力学转变

李瑞, 徐邦林, 周建芳, 姜恩华, 汪秉宏, 袁五届

A synaptic plasticity induced change in synaptic intensity variation and neurodynamic transition during awakening-sleep cycle

Li Rui, Xu Bang-Lin, Zhou Jian-Fang, Jiang En-Hua, Wang Bing-Hong, Yuan Wu-Jie
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 实验发现, 在觉醒时学习导致了突触强度的净增强, 并伴随着神经元从强直性发放向阵发性发放的转变; 在睡眠时突触强度净减弱到基准值, 并且神经元的阵发性发放重新转变为强直性发放. 本文提出了一种突触可塑性模型, 并在由Hindmarsh-Rose神经元组成的神经网络中, 实现了觉醒-睡眠周期中这种突触强度的变化和神经元发放动力学的转变. 通过数值模拟和理论分析进一步发现, 神经网络的平均突触权值在长时间的觉醒或睡眠后可以达到一个稳定值, 该稳定值取决于模型中一些特定参数的比值. 特别地, 当平均突触权值达到稳定值时, 突触权值的分布呈现出稳定的真实神经系统中观察到的对数正态分布, 并且这种分布的波动性与突触可塑性模型中噪声的波动性呈正相关. 本文提出的突触可塑性模型及其动力学的研究结果可为觉醒-睡眠周期中突触可塑性及其神经元发放的生理机制研究提供理论参考, 并在睡眠障碍治疗或干预措施的开发中具有潜在的应用价值.
    It has been found experimentally that learning during wakefulness leads to a net enhancement of synaptic strength, accompanied by the neural dynamical transition from tonic to bursting firing, while the net synaptic strength decreases to a baseline level during sleep, accompanied by the transition from bursting to tonic firing. In this paper, we establish a model of synaptic plasticity, which can realize synaptic strength changes and neural dynamical transitions in wakefulness-sleep cycle by using the coupled Hindmarsh-Rose neurons. Through numerical simulation and theoretical analysis, it is further found that the average synaptic weight of the neural network can reach a stable value during either prolonged wakefulness or prolonged sleep, which depends on the ratio of some specific parameters in the model. Particularly, the synaptic weight exhibits a stable log-normal distribution observed in a real neural system, when the average synaptic weight reaches a stable value. Moreover, the fluctuation of this weight distribution is positively correlated with the fluctuation of noise in the synaptic plasticity model. The provided model of the synaptic plasticity and its dynamics results can provide a theoretical reference for studying the physiological mechanism of synaptic plasticity and neuronal firings during the wakefulness-sleep cycle, and they are expected to have potential applications in the development of therapeutic interventions for sleep disorders.
      通信作者: 周建芳, zhoujf2018@163.com ; 袁五届, yuanwj2005@163.com
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 11875031)、安徽省研究生教育质量工程项目(批准号: 2022jyjxggyj290)、淮北师范大学结余经费资助项目(批准号: 2023ZK056)、中国人力资源和社会保障部留学人员科技活动择优资助项目和智能计算理论及应用优秀科研创新团队项目(批准号: 2023AH010044)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Zhou Jian-Fang, zhoujf2018@163.com ; Yuan Wu-Jie, yuanwj2005@163.com
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11875031), the Postgraduate Education Quality Engineering Project of Anhui Province, China (Grant No. 2022jyjxggyj290), the Expansion Project of Huaibei Normal University, China (Grant No. 2023ZK056), the Scientific and Technological Activity Foundations for Preferred Overseas Chinese Scholar, Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security of China, and the Intelligent Computing Theory and Application of Excellent Scientific Research and Innovation Team Project, China (Grant No. 2023AH010044).
    [1]

    Siegel J M 2001 Science 294 1058Google Scholar

    [2]

    Diekelmann S, Born J 2010 Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11 114Google Scholar

    [3]

    Inostroza M, Born J 2013 Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 36 79Google Scholar

    [4]

    De Lavilléon G, Lacroix M M, Rondi-Reig L, Benchenane K 2015 Nat. Neurosci. 18 493Google Scholar

    [5]

    Tononi G, Cirelli C 2006 Sleep Med. Rev. 10 49Google Scholar

    [6]

    Stickgold R, Hobson J A, Fosse R, Fosse M 2001 Science 294 1052Google Scholar

    [7]

    Tononi G, Cirelli C 2003 Brain Res. Bull. 62 143Google Scholar

    [8]

    McCormick D A, Feeser H R 1990 Neurosci. 39 103Google Scholar

    [9]

    Steriade M, Nuñez A, Amzica F 1993 J. Neurosci. 13 3252Google Scholar

    [10]

    Steriade M, McCormick D A, Sejnowski T J 1993 Science 262 679Google Scholar

    [11]

    Postnova S, Voigt K, Braun H A 2007 J. Biol. Phys. 33 129Google Scholar

    [12]

    Zhou J F, Jiang E H, Xu B L, Xu K, Zhou C, Yuan W J 2021 Phys. Rev. E 104 054407Google Scholar

    [13]

    Dhamala M, Jirsa V K, Ding M 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 028101Google Scholar

    [14]

    Nguyen T, Babawale O, Kim T, Jo H J, Liu H, Kim J G 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 16144Google Scholar

    [15]

    Curtis B J, Williams P G, Jones C R, Anderson J S 2016 Brain Behav. 6 e00576Google Scholar

    [16]

    Xu B L, Zhou J F, Li R, Jiang E H, Yuan W J 2023 Physica A 617 128663Google Scholar

    [17]

    Abbott L F, Regehr W G 2004 Nature 431 796Google Scholar

    [18]

    Destexhe A, Marder E 2004 Nature 431 789Google Scholar

    [19]

    Caporale N, Dan Y 2008 Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 31 25Google Scholar

    [20]

    Zhou J F, Yuan W J, Chen D, Wang B H, Zhou Z, Boccaletti S, Wang Z 2019 Phys. Rev. E 99 032419Google Scholar

    [21]

    Song S, Miller K D, Abbott L F 2000 Nat. Neurosci. 3 919Google Scholar

    [22]

    Yuan W J, Zhou J F, Zhou C 2013 PLoS One 8 e84644Google Scholar

    [23]

    Babadi B, Abbott L F 2010 PLoS Comput. Biol. 6 e1000961Google Scholar

    [24]

    王美丽, 王峻松 2015 物理学报 64 108701Google Scholar

    Wang M L, Wang J S 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 108701Google Scholar

    [25]

    Takahashi Y K, Kori H, Masuda N 2009 Phys. Rev. E 79 051904Google Scholar

    [26]

    Meisel C, Gross T 2009 Phys. Rev. E 80 061917Google Scholar

    [27]

    Andrade K C, Spoormaker V I, Dresler M, Wehrle R, Holsboer F, Sämann P G, Czisch M 2011 J. Neurosci. 31 10331Google Scholar

    [28]

    Hindmarsh J L, Rose R M 1984 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 221 87Google Scholar

    [29]

    Erdős P, Rényi A 1960 Publ. Math. Inst. Hung. Acad. Sci. 5 17

    [30]

    Vanvreeswijk C, Sompolinsky H 1996 Science 274 1724Google Scholar

    [31]

    Vogels T P, Abbott L F 2005 J. Neurosci. 25 10786Google Scholar

    [32]

    Bi G Q, Poo M 1998 J. Neurosci. 18 10464Google Scholar

    [33]

    Van Rossum M C W, Bi G Q, Turrigiano G G 2000 J. Neurosci. 20 8812Google Scholar

    [34]

    McCormick D A 1992 J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 9 212Google Scholar

    [35]

    Steriade M 2003 Front. Biosci. 8 878Google Scholar

    [36]

    Li K T, Liang J, Zhou C 2021 Neural Plast. 2021 6668175Google Scholar

    [37]

    Wang S, Zhou C 2009 Phys. Rev. E 79 061910Google Scholar

    [38]

    Vyazovskiy V V, Olcese U, Hanlon E C, Nir Y, Cirelli C, Tononi G 2011 Nature 472 443Google Scholar

    [39]

    Buzsáki G, Mizuseki K 2014 Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 15 264Google Scholar

    [40]

    Song S, Sjöström P J, Reigl M, Nelson S, Chklovskii D B 2005 PLoS Biol. 3 e68Google Scholar

  • 图 1  突触可塑性引起觉醒-睡眠周期中突触强度的变化和神经动力学的转变 (a) $A_{+}$(实线)和$A_{-}$(虚线)的变化, 觉醒: $A_{+} = 0.006 $$ +\;0.003 \dfrac{1}{1+{\text{e}}^{-0.005(t'-900)}}$, $A_{-}=0.006+0.003 \left[1-\dfrac{1}{1+{\text{e}}^{-0.005(t'-900)}}\right]$, 睡眠: $A_{-}=0.006+0.003 \dfrac{1}{1+{\text{e}}^{-0.005(t''-900)}}$, $A_{+} = 0.006+0.003 \left[1-\dfrac{1}{1+{\text{e}}^{-0.005(t''-900)}}\right]$, 其中$t'$表示t除以$10000$的余数, $t''$表示t除以$5000$的余数; (b)平均突触权值$\overline{W}$; (c)随机选定的神经元$i$的膜电位$x_i$; (d) 平均膜电位$\overline{x}$; (e)网络的同步指数$Syn$. 垂直虚线表示觉醒和睡眠之间的交替时刻. 参数$A_+$和$A_-$的取值为$0.009$和$0.006$, 并且它们的值在觉醒和睡眠交替时也迅速交替. 参数$\tau_+=\tau_-=25$, $c_{{{\mathrm{p}}}}=1$ 和$c_{{{\mathrm{d}}}}=2$

    Fig. 1.  Synaptic changes and neural dynamical transitions induced by the synaptic plasticity for wakefulness-sleep cycle. (a) Changes of $A_{+}$ (solid line) and $A_{-}$ (dashed line). Wakefulness: $A_{+}=0.006+0.003\dfrac{1}{1+{{{\mathrm{e}}}}^{-0.005(t'-900)}}$, $A_{-}=0.006+ 0.003\Big[1- $$ \dfrac{1}{1+{{{\mathrm{e}}}}^{-0.005(t'-900)}}\Big]$, sleep: $A_{-}=0.006+0.003\dfrac{1}{1+{{{\mathrm{e}}}}^{-0.005(t''-900)}}$, $A_{+}=0.006+0.003\left[1-\dfrac{1}{1+{{{\mathrm{e}}}}^{-0.005(t''-900)}}\right]$, where$t'$ represents the remainder of t divided by $10000$ and $t''$ represents the remainder of t divided by $5000$. (b) Average synaptic weight $\overline{W}$. (c) Potential $x_i$ of a randomly chosen neuron $i$. (d) Average potential $\overline{x}= \dfrac1 N \displaystyle\sum\nolimits^N_{i=1}x_i$. (e) Synchrony index $Syn$ of the network. The vertical dashed lines indicate moments of exchange between wakefulness and sleep. Parameters $A_+$ and $A_-$ rapidly exchange between $0.009$ and $0.006$ in very short periods during wakefulness and sleep. Here, parameters $\tau_+=\tau_-=25$, $c_{{{\mathrm{p}}}}=1$ and $c_{{{\mathrm{d}}}}=2$ are given during both wakefulness and sleep.

    图 2  在一个觉醒-睡眠周期内, 突触权值分布概率密度$P(W, t)$的灰度图及网络平均突触权值$\overline{W}$的变化曲线(实线) (a), (b)不含有权值依赖的原始STDP情况; (c), (d)含有权值依赖的改进STDP情况; 觉醒睡眠周期设置为10000 (a), (c) 和40000 (b), (d); 垂直虚线表示觉醒和睡眠的交替时刻

    Fig. 2.  Gray-scale plots of probability density $P(W, t)$ for weight distribution and the average synaptic weight $\overline{W}$ (solid line) in the absence of weight dependence (a), (b) and in the presence of weight dependence (c), (d), for the different periods of wakefulness-sleep cycle, 10000 (a), (c) and 40000 (b), (d). The vertical dashed lines indicate the moments of exchange between wakefulness and sleep.

    图 3  稳定的平均突触权值$\overline{W}_{\text{s}}$与比值$A_+/A_-$的函数关系 (a) $c_{\text{p}}=c_{\text{d}}=1$固定不变, $\tau_+/\tau_-$取不同的比值; (b) $\tau_+=\tau_-= $$ 25$固定不变, $c_{\text{p}}/c_{\text{d}}$取不同的比值. 参数选择如下: $A_-$在$[0.002, 0.01]$的范围内随机取值, $A_+$的值通过$A_-$乘以相应的比值得到; (a)中$\tau_-=25$, $\tau_+$分别根据相应的比值计算给出; (b) 中$c_{\text{p}}=1$, $c_{{{\mathrm{d}}}}$分别根据相应的比值计算给出. 每个数据都是5次独立数值计算的平均数; 为了对比, 在图(a), (b)中分别用实线表示$\overline{W}_{\text{s}}=0.5 A_+/A_-$, $\overline{W}_{\text{s}}=A_+/A_-$和$\overline{W}_{{s}}=2 A_+/A_-$的线性关系

    Fig. 3.  Stable average weight $\overline{W}_{\text{s}}$ as a function of $A_+/A_-$: (a) At different ratio $\tau_+/\tau_-$ and $c_{\text{p}}=c_{\text{d}}=1$; (b) at different ratio $c_{\text{p}}/c_{\text{d}}$ and $\tau_+=\tau_-=25$. Here, $A_-$ is given randomly in the range of $0.002$ to $0.01$, $A_+$ is calculated and given by using the ratio of the corresponding parameter. $\tau_-=25$, and $\tau_+$ is calculated and given by using the ratios of the corresponding parameter in panel (a). $c_{\text{p}}=1$, and $c_{\text{d}}$ is calculated and given by using the ratio of the corresponding parameter in panel (b). Data are averaged over 5 independent realizations. For comparison, the solid lines indicating the linear relations $\overline{W}_{\text{s}}=0.5 A_+/A_-$, $\overline{W}_{\text{s}}=A_+/A_-$ and $\overline{W}_{\text{s}}=2 A_+/A_-$ are shown in panels (a) and (b)

    图 5  稳定的平均突触权值$\overline{W}_{\text{s}}$与比值$c_{\text{p}}/c_{\text{d}}$的函数关系 (a) $\tau_+=\tau_-=25$固定不变, $A_+/A_-$取不同的比值; (b) $A_+=A_-= $$ 0.006$固定不变, $\tau_+/\tau_-$取不同的比值. 参数选择如下: $c_{\text{d}}$在$[0.5, 2.5]$的范围内随机取值, $c_{\text{p}}$的值通过$c_{\text{d}}$乘以相应的比值得到; (a)中$A_-=0.004$, $A_+$分别根据相应的比值计算给出; (b) 中$\tau_-=25$, $\tau_+$分别根据相应的比值计算给出. 每个数据都是5次独立数值计算的平均数; 为了对比, 在图(a), (b)中分别用实线表示$\overline{W}_{\text{s}}=0.5 c_{\text{p}}/c_{\text{d}}$, $\overline{W}_{\text{s}}= c_{\text{p}}/c_{\text{d}}$和$\overline{W}_{\text{s}}=2 c_{\text{p}}/c_{\text{d}}$的线性关系

    Fig. 5.  Stable average weight $\overline{W}_{\text{s}}$ as a function of $c_{\text{p}}/c_{\text{d}}$: (a) At different ratio $A_+/A_-$ with $\tau_+=\tau_-=25$; (b) at different rations $\tau_+/\tau_-$ with $A_+=A_-=0.006$. $c_{{\rm d}}$ is given randomly in the range of $0.5$ to $2.5$, and $c_{\text{p}}$ is calculated and given by using the ratio of the corresponding parameter. $A_-=0.004$, and $A_+$ is calculated and given by using the ratio of the corresponding parameter in panel (a). $\tau_-=25$, and $\tau_+$ is calculated and given by using the ratio of the corresponding parameter in panel (b). Data are averaged over 5 independent realizations. For comparison, the solid lines indicating the linear relations $\overline{W}_{\text{s}}=0.5 c_{\text{p}}/c_{\text{d}}$, $\overline{W}_{\text{s}}= c_{\text{p}}/c_{\text{d}}$ and $\overline{W}_{\text{s}}=2 c_{\text{p}}/c_{\text{d}}$ are shown in panels (a) and (b)

    图 4  稳定的平均突触权值$\overline{W}_{\text{s}}$与比值$\tau_+/\tau_-$的函数关系 (a) $c_{\text{p}}=c_{\text{d}}=1$固定不变, $A_+/A_-$取不同的比值; (b) $A_+=A_-= $$ 0.006$固定不变, $c_{\text{p}}/c_{\text{d}}$取不同的比值. 参数选择如下: $\tau_-$在$[10, 75]$的范围内随机取值, $\tau_+$的值通过$\tau_-$乘以相应的比值得到; (a)中$A_-=0.004$, $A_+$分别根据相应的比值计算给出; (b)中$c_{\text{p}}=1$, $c_{\text{d}}$分别根据相应的比值计算给出. 每个数据都是5次独立数值计算的平均数; 为了对比, 在图(a), (b)中分别用实线表示$\overline{W}_{\text{s}}=0.5\tau_+/\tau_-$, $\overline{W}_{\text{s}}=\tau_+/\tau_-$和$\overline{W}_{\text{s}}=2\tau_+/\tau_-$的线性关系

    Fig. 4.  Stable average weight $\overline{W}_{\text{s}}$ as a function of $\tau_+/\tau_-$: (a) At different ratio $A_+/A_-$ with with $c_{\text{p}}=c_{\text{d}}=1$; (b) at different ratio $c_{\text{p}}/c_{\text{d}}$ with $A_+=A_-=0.006$. $\tau_-$ is given randomly in the range of 10 to 75, $\tau_+$ is calculated and given by using the ratio of the corresponding parameter. $A_-=0.004$, and $A_+$ is calculated and given by using the ratio of the corresponding parameter in panel (a). $c_{\text{p}}=1$, and $c_{\text{d}}$ is calculated and given by using the ratio of the corresponding parameter in panel (b). Data are averaged over 5 independent realizations. For comparison, the solid lines indicating the linear relations $\overline{W}_{\text{s}}=0.5\tau_+/\tau_-$, $\overline{W}_{\text{s}}=\tau_+/\tau_-$ and $\overline{W}_{\text{s}}=2\tau_+/\tau_-$ are shown in panels (a) and (b)

    图 6  稳定的平均突触权值$\overline{W}_{{{\mathrm{s}}}}$与比值$A_+\tau_+c_{\text{p}} / A_-\tau_-c_{\text{d}}$的函数关系. 其中$A_+$和$A_-$在$[0.002, 0.01]$范围内随机选取, $\tau_+$和$\tau_-$在$[10, 75]$范围内随机选取, $c_{\text{p}}$和$c_{\text{d}}$在$[0.5, 2.5]$范围内随机选取

    Fig. 6.  Stable average weight $\overline{W}_{{{\mathrm{s}}}}$ as a function of $A_+\tau_+c_{\text{p}}/A_-\tau_-c_{\text{d}}$. Here, $A_+$ and $A_-$ are both chosen randomly in the range of $0.002$ to $0.01$, $\tau_+$ and $\tau_-$ are both chosen randomly in the range of 10 to 75, and $c_{\text{p}}$ and $c_{\text{d}}$ are both chosen randomly in the range of $0.5$ to $2.5$.

    图 7  不同$\sigma_{\nu}$条件下突触权值分布的概率密度$P(W)$ (a) 在线性-线性坐标中; (b) 在对数-线性坐标中. 纵向虚线表示不同$\sigma_{\nu}$的相应最概然权值$W_{\text{p}}$. 参数选择如下: $A_+=A_-= $$ 0.004$, $\tau_+=\tau_-=25$, $c_{\text{p}}=1$和$c_{\text{d}}=2$. 结果是20次数值计算的平均

    Fig. 7.  Probability density $P(W)$ for different $\sigma_{\nu}$ in linear-linear space (a), and in log-linear space (b). The vertical dashed lines indicate the corresponding most probable weights $W_{{{\mathrm{p}}}}$ for different $\sigma_{\nu}$. Here, parameters $A_+ = A_- = $$ 0.004$, $\tau_+=\tau_-=25$, $c_{{{\mathrm{p}}}}=1$ and $c_{{{\mathrm{d}}}}=2$ are given. Results are averaged over 20 realizations.

    图 8  稳定的突触权值分布的各特征量与$\sigma_{\nu}$的函数关系 (a) 平均突触权值$\overline{W}_{\text{s}}$和最概然权值$W_{\text{p}}$; (b) 概率密度峰值$P_{\text{p}}$; (c) 突触权值的标准差$\sigma_{W}$和变差系数$CV$. 为了比较, 图(a) 中水平虚线表示用(10)式计算的$\overline{W}_{\text{s}}$的理论值; 垂直虚线表示$\sigma_{\nu}$的临界值. 参数选择如下: $A_+=A_-= $$ 0.004$, $\tau_+=\tau_-=25$, $c_{\text{p}}=1$和$c_{\text{d}}=2$. 结果是20次数值计算的平均

    Fig. 8.  Characteristic quantities of the stable synaptic weight distribution as a function of $\sigma_{\nu}$: (a) The average synaptic weight $\overline{W}_{\text{s}}$ and the most probable weight $W_{\text{p}}$; (b) the most probability density $P_{\text{p}}$; (c) the standard deviation of weight $\sigma_{W}$ and the coefficient of variation $CV$. For comparison, the theoretical value of $\overline{W}_{\text{s}}$ in Eq. (10) is shown by using the horizontal dashed line in panel (a). The vertical dashed line denotes the critical $\sigma_{\nu}$. Here, parameters $A_+=A_-=0.004$, $\tau_+=\tau_-=25$, $c_{\text{p}}=1$ and $c_{\text{d}}=2$ are given. Results are averaged over 20 realizations.

  • [1]

    Siegel J M 2001 Science 294 1058Google Scholar

    [2]

    Diekelmann S, Born J 2010 Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11 114Google Scholar

    [3]

    Inostroza M, Born J 2013 Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 36 79Google Scholar

    [4]

    De Lavilléon G, Lacroix M M, Rondi-Reig L, Benchenane K 2015 Nat. Neurosci. 18 493Google Scholar

    [5]

    Tononi G, Cirelli C 2006 Sleep Med. Rev. 10 49Google Scholar

    [6]

    Stickgold R, Hobson J A, Fosse R, Fosse M 2001 Science 294 1052Google Scholar

    [7]

    Tononi G, Cirelli C 2003 Brain Res. Bull. 62 143Google Scholar

    [8]

    McCormick D A, Feeser H R 1990 Neurosci. 39 103Google Scholar

    [9]

    Steriade M, Nuñez A, Amzica F 1993 J. Neurosci. 13 3252Google Scholar

    [10]

    Steriade M, McCormick D A, Sejnowski T J 1993 Science 262 679Google Scholar

    [11]

    Postnova S, Voigt K, Braun H A 2007 J. Biol. Phys. 33 129Google Scholar

    [12]

    Zhou J F, Jiang E H, Xu B L, Xu K, Zhou C, Yuan W J 2021 Phys. Rev. E 104 054407Google Scholar

    [13]

    Dhamala M, Jirsa V K, Ding M 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 028101Google Scholar

    [14]

    Nguyen T, Babawale O, Kim T, Jo H J, Liu H, Kim J G 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 16144Google Scholar

    [15]

    Curtis B J, Williams P G, Jones C R, Anderson J S 2016 Brain Behav. 6 e00576Google Scholar

    [16]

    Xu B L, Zhou J F, Li R, Jiang E H, Yuan W J 2023 Physica A 617 128663Google Scholar

    [17]

    Abbott L F, Regehr W G 2004 Nature 431 796Google Scholar

    [18]

    Destexhe A, Marder E 2004 Nature 431 789Google Scholar

    [19]

    Caporale N, Dan Y 2008 Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 31 25Google Scholar

    [20]

    Zhou J F, Yuan W J, Chen D, Wang B H, Zhou Z, Boccaletti S, Wang Z 2019 Phys. Rev. E 99 032419Google Scholar

    [21]

    Song S, Miller K D, Abbott L F 2000 Nat. Neurosci. 3 919Google Scholar

    [22]

    Yuan W J, Zhou J F, Zhou C 2013 PLoS One 8 e84644Google Scholar

    [23]

    Babadi B, Abbott L F 2010 PLoS Comput. Biol. 6 e1000961Google Scholar

    [24]

    王美丽, 王峻松 2015 物理学报 64 108701Google Scholar

    Wang M L, Wang J S 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 108701Google Scholar

    [25]

    Takahashi Y K, Kori H, Masuda N 2009 Phys. Rev. E 79 051904Google Scholar

    [26]

    Meisel C, Gross T 2009 Phys. Rev. E 80 061917Google Scholar

    [27]

    Andrade K C, Spoormaker V I, Dresler M, Wehrle R, Holsboer F, Sämann P G, Czisch M 2011 J. Neurosci. 31 10331Google Scholar

    [28]

    Hindmarsh J L, Rose R M 1984 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 221 87Google Scholar

    [29]

    Erdős P, Rényi A 1960 Publ. Math. Inst. Hung. Acad. Sci. 5 17

    [30]

    Vanvreeswijk C, Sompolinsky H 1996 Science 274 1724Google Scholar

    [31]

    Vogels T P, Abbott L F 2005 J. Neurosci. 25 10786Google Scholar

    [32]

    Bi G Q, Poo M 1998 J. Neurosci. 18 10464Google Scholar

    [33]

    Van Rossum M C W, Bi G Q, Turrigiano G G 2000 J. Neurosci. 20 8812Google Scholar

    [34]

    McCormick D A 1992 J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 9 212Google Scholar

    [35]

    Steriade M 2003 Front. Biosci. 8 878Google Scholar

    [36]

    Li K T, Liang J, Zhou C 2021 Neural Plast. 2021 6668175Google Scholar

    [37]

    Wang S, Zhou C 2009 Phys. Rev. E 79 061910Google Scholar

    [38]

    Vyazovskiy V V, Olcese U, Hanlon E C, Nir Y, Cirelli C, Tononi G 2011 Nature 472 443Google Scholar

    [39]

    Buzsáki G, Mizuseki K 2014 Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 15 264Google Scholar

    [40]

    Song S, Sjöström P J, Reigl M, Nelson S, Chklovskii D B 2005 PLoS Biol. 3 e68Google Scholar

  • [1] 李松蔚, 谢勇. 基于功率谱的神经元放电早期预警信号. 物理学报, 2025, 74(1): 010501. doi: 10.7498/aps.74.20241471
    [2] 宋天舒, 夏辉. 基于数值稳定型神经网络的Villain-Lai-Das Sarma方程的动力学标度行为研究. 物理学报, 2024, 73(16): 160501. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240852
    [3] 方波浪, 王建国, 冯国斌. 基于物理信息神经网络的光斑质心计算. 物理学报, 2022, 71(20): 200601. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220670
    [4] 陈义豪, 徐威, 王钰琪, 万相, 李岳峰, 梁定康, 陆立群, 刘鑫伟, 连晓娟, 胡二涛, 郭宇锋, 许剑光, 童祎, 肖建. 基于二维材料MXene的仿神经突触忆阻器的制备和长/短时程突触可塑性的实现. 物理学报, 2019, 68(9): 098501. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182306
    [5] 魏德志, 陈福集, 郑小雪. 基于混沌理论和改进径向基函数神经网络的网络舆情预测方法. 物理学报, 2015, 64(11): 110503. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.110503
    [6] 李佳佳, 吴莹, 独盟盟, 刘伟明. 电磁辐射诱发神经元放电节律转迁的动力学行为研究. 物理学报, 2015, 64(3): 030503. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.030503
    [7] 夏小飞, 王俊松. 基于分岔理论的突触可塑性对神经群动力学特性调控规律研究. 物理学报, 2014, 63(14): 140503. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.140503
    [8] 戴存礼, 吴威, 赵艳艳, 姚雪霞, 赵志刚. 权重分布对加权局域世界网络动力学同步的影响. 物理学报, 2013, 62(10): 108903. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.108903
    [9] 李华青, 廖晓峰, 黄宏宇. 基于神经网络和滑模控制的不确定混沌系统同步. 物理学报, 2011, 60(2): 020512. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.020512
    [10] 刘勇, 谢勇. 分数阶FitzHugh-Nagumo模型神经元的动力学特性及其同步. 物理学报, 2010, 59(3): 2147-2155. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.2147
    [11] 吴然超. 时滞离散神经网络的同步控制. 物理学报, 2009, 58(1): 139-142. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.139
    [12] 赵海全, 张家树. 混沌通信系统中非线性信道的自适应组合神经网络均衡. 物理学报, 2008, 57(7): 3996-4006. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.3996
    [13] 戴存礼, 刘曙娥, 田 亮, 施大宁. 推广的失活网络动力学同步优化. 物理学报, 2008, 57(8): 4800-4804. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.4800
    [14] 王永生, 孙 瑾, 王昌金, 范洪达. 变参数混沌时间序列的神经网络预测研究. 物理学报, 2008, 57(10): 6120-6131. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.6120
    [15] 王瑞敏, 赵 鸿. 神经元传输函数对人工神经网络动力学特性的影响. 物理学报, 2007, 56(2): 730-739. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.730
    [16] 王占山, 张化光, 王智良. 一类混沌神经网络的全局同步. 物理学报, 2006, 55(6): 2687-2693. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.2687
    [17] 王耀南, 谭 文. 混沌系统的遗传神经网络控制. 物理学报, 2003, 52(11): 2723-2728. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.2723
    [18] 谭文, 王耀南, 刘祖润, 周少武. 非线性系统混沌运动的神经网络控制. 物理学报, 2002, 51(11): 2463-2466. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.2463
    [19] 神经网络的自适应删剪学习算法及其应用. 物理学报, 2001, 50(4): 674-681. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.674
    [20] 关新平, 唐英干, 范正平, 王益群. 基于神经网络的混沌系统鲁棒自适应同步. 物理学报, 2001, 50(11): 2112-2115. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.2112
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2652
  • PDF下载量:  60
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-06-25
  • 修回日期:  2023-09-05
  • 上网日期:  2023-09-15
  • 刊出日期:  2023-12-20

/

返回文章
返回