-
目前, 热电双层膜的电输运性能测量及预测一般采用并联模型理论, 然而并联模型使用条件缺乏理论和实验的支持和验证. 本文借助于COMSOL Multiphysics软件采用有限元理论模拟得到了Cu/Si, Ag/Si双层膜在施加温度差下的塞贝克系数, 并与并联模型进行比较. 研究双层膜两端是否镀金属Pt层、双层膜之间插入高阻/低阻/绝缘界面对双层膜的塞贝克系数测量结果的影响. 研究发现, 当冷热端无Pt时, 高阻和电绝缘界面时Si和Cu两侧电势分别沿温度梯度方向均匀分布, 测得其塞贝克系数分别与材料本身的值相同, 低阻界面时Cu侧热电势随着探针间距L均匀变化, Si侧呈现非均匀变化. 有Pt时, Cu和Si侧的热电势沿着温度梯度的方向分布均匀, 无论在绝缘/高阻/低阻界面中, Si和Cu两侧测量值均与Cu塞贝克系数相同. 实验研究了Si/Ag和Bi/Ag双层膜, 无Pt时, Si/Ag双层膜Si侧的塞贝克系数的绝对值随着温度的降低而降低, 但是Ag侧塞贝克系数的绝对值随着温度的降低而升高. 有Pt时, Bi/Ag双层膜两侧的塞贝克系数相同.
-
关键词:
- 双层热电薄膜 /
- 塞贝克系数 /
- 双层膜并联模型 /
- COMSOL Multiphysics
Currently, the measurement and prediction of the electrical transport performance of thermoelectric double-layer membrane is often based on the theory of parallel model. However, the conditions under which the parallel model can be used lack theoretical and experimental support and validation. In this work, the Seebeck coefficients of Cu/Si and Ag/Si bilayers under applied temperature difference are obtained by using finite element theory simulations with the help of COMSOL Multiphysics software and compared with the results from the parallel model. Whether the ends of the bilayer plated with a metal Pt layer, and the insertion of a high-resistance/low-resistance/insulation interface between the bilayers affect the Seebeck coefficient measurements of the bilayer are investigated. It is found that when there is no Pt at the hot end or cold end, the potentials on the Si side and Cu side at the high-resistance and electrically insulating interfaces are uniformly distributed along the direction of the temperature gradient, respectively, and the measured Seebeck coefficients are the same as the values of the materials’ own, respectively, and the thermal potential on the Cu side at the low-resistance interface varies uniformly with the probe spacing L, while the thermal potential on the Si side shows a non-uniform variation. With Pt, the thermal potentials on the Cu side and Si side are uniformly distributed along the direction of the temperature gradient, and the measured values on both Si side and Cu side are the same as the Cu Seebeck coefficients, regardless of the insulating/high-resistance/low-resistance interface. The Si/Ag and Bi/Ag bilayers are investigated experimentally. In the absence of Pt, the absolute value of the Seebeck coefficient on the Si side of Si/Ag bilayer decreases with temperature decreasing, but the absolute value of the Seebeck coefficient on the Ag side increases with temperature decreasing. In the presence of Pt, the Seebeck coefficients on both sides of the Bi/Ag bilayer membrane are equal.-
Keywords:
- double-layer thermoelectric film /
- Seebeck coefficient /
- double layer parallel model /
- COMSOL Multiphysics
[1] 陈立东, 刘睿恒, 史讯 2017 热电材料与器件 (北京: 科学出版社) 第1页
Chen L D, Liu R H, Shi X 2017 Thermoelectric Materials and Devices (Beijing: Science Press) p1
[2] Mizue M, Masashi M, Kimihiro O 2013 J. Micromech. Microeng. 23 115016Google Scholar
[3] Nouredine O, Alain P, Abdelkhalek K, Khalid H 2023 Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 98 29Google Scholar
[4] Ihtesham C, Ravi P, Kelly L, Gregory C, Sridhar N, Ravi M, David K, Randall A, Rama V 2009 Nat. Nanotechnol. 4 235Google Scholar
[5] Yang C, Souchay D, Knei M, et al. 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 16076Google Scholar
[6] Pilaipon N, Rachsak S, Mati H, Aparporn S 2017 J. Electron. Mater. 4 66444Google Scholar
[7] Yordanov P, Wochner P, Ibrahimkutty S, Dietl C, Wrobel F, Felici R, Gregori G, Maier J, Keimer B, Habermeier H U 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 253101Google Scholar
[8] Gromova D G, Shterna Y I, Rogacheva M S, Shulyat’eva A S, Kirilenkoa E P, Shterna M Y, Fedorovb V A, Mikhailovaa M S 2016 Inorg. Mater. 52 1132Google Scholar
[9] Hinterleitner B, Knapp I, Poneder M, et al. 2019 Nature 576 85Google Scholar
[10] Masaaki I, Hironori A, Daisuke T, Jiro K 2019 Electr. Eng. Jpn. 208 10Google Scholar
[11] Ju H, Kim J 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 35354Google Scholar
[12] Liu S Y, Peng S J, Ma J, Li G J, Qin X S, Li M M, Wang Q 2017 Superlattice. Microst. 104 282Google Scholar
[13] Tani J I, Ishikawa H 2023 Mater. Lett. 331 133460Google Scholar
[14] Tian K, Tiwar A 2019 Sci. Rep. 9 3133Google Scholar
[15] Usop R, Hasnan M M I M, Mohamad M, Ahmad M K, Said S M, Salleh F 2022 Micromachines. Basel. 13 2169Google Scholar
[16] Stevens D L, Ortiz A, Cho C, Gamage G A, Ren Z F, Grunlan J C 2021 Appl. Phys. Lett. 118 151904Google Scholar
[17] Sumino M, Harada K, Ikeda M, Tanaka S, Miyazaki K, Adachi C 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 118 093308Google Scholar
[18] Nordheim V L, Gorter C J 1935 Physics 2 383Google Scholar
[19] Ho T L, Ding K, Lyapunov N, Suen C H, Wong L W, Zhao J, Yang M, Zhou X, Dai J Y 2022 Nanomaterials. Basel. 12 2128Google Scholar
[20] Hinterleitner B, Knapp I, Poneder M, et al. 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 191911Google Scholar
[21] Bhogra A, Masarrat A, Hasina D, Meena R, Kumar A, Som T, Dong C L, Chen C L, Kandasami A 2021 Mater. Lett. 282 128880Google Scholar
[22] Koga T, Cronin S B, Dresselhaus M S, Liu J L, Wang K L 2000 Appl. Phys. Lett. 77 1490Google Scholar
[23] Heinze S, Habermeier H U, Cristiani G, Canosa S B, Tacon M L, Keimer B 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 131603Google Scholar
[24] Meng J H, Wu H C, Gao D Y, Zhang K, Gui L, Yan W M 2020 Energy 217 119360
[25] Chen L, Lee J 2015 Appl. Energ. 150 138Google Scholar
-
图 4 双层膜热电模型 (a)无Pt高阻界面; (b)无Pt低阻界面; (c)无Pt电绝缘界面; (d)有Pt高阻界面; (e)有Pt低阻界面; (f)有Pt电绝缘界面
Fig. 4. Two-layer thermoelectric model: (a) Without Pt high resistance interface; (b) Pt low resistance interface; (c) Pt electrical insulation interface; (d) Pt high resistance interface; (e) Pt low resistance interface; (f) Pt electrical insulation interface.
图 5 (a)有Pt模型模型热电势分布图; (b)无Pt模型模型热电势分布图; (c)无Pt模型热端热电势分布图; (d)无Pt模型冷端热电势分布图
Fig. 5. (a) Thermoelectric potential distribution diagram with Pt model; (b) thermoelectric potential distribution diagram without Pt model; (c) thermoelectric potential distribution diagram at the hot end of the Pt model; (d) thermoelectric potential distribution diagram of the cold end of the Pt-free model.
图 6 (a)有Pt模型与无Pt模型热电势分布曲线; (b)有Pt模型和无Pt模型Si和Cu侧不同位置测量的Seebeck系数及根据并联模型验证公式得到的Cu/Si双层膜的Seebeck系数理论值
Fig. 6. (a) Thermoelectric potential distribution curves with and without Pt model; (b) Seebeck coefficients measured at different positions on Si and Cu side with and without Pt model and their parallel verification formulas.
图 8 (a)无Pt高阻或电绝缘界面热电势分布曲线; (b) 无Pt低阻界面的热电势分布曲线; (c)无Pt高阻或电绝缘界面双层热电模型不同位置的Seebeck系数; (d)无Pt低阻界面双层热电模型不同位置的Seebeck系数
Fig. 8. (a) Thermoelectric potential distribution curve at the interface without Pt high resistance or electrical insulation; (b) thermoelectric potential distribution curve without PT-low resistance interface; (c) Seebeck coefficients at different locations of double-layer thermoelectric models without Pt high resistance or electrically insulated interfaces; (d) Seebeck coefficients at different positions of a two-layer thermoelectric model without Pt low resistance interface.
图 10 (a)有Pt高阻、低阻界面双层热电模型Si侧、界面、Cu侧热电势分布曲线; (b) 有Pt高阻或低阻界面双层热电模型不同位置的Seebeck系数; (c)有Pt电绝缘界面双层热电模型Si侧、界面、Cu侧热电势分布曲线; (d)有Pt电绝缘界面不同位置的Seebeck系数
Fig. 10. (a) Thermoelectric potential distribution curves on Si side, interface and Cu side of the double-layer thermoelectric model with Pt high resistance and low resistance interface; (b) Seebeck coefficients at different locations of double-layer thermoelectric models with Pt high or low resistance interfaces; (c) thermoelectric potential distribution curves of Si side, interface and Cu side of double-layer thermoelectric model with Pt electrical insulation interface; (d) Seebeck coefficient with Pt electrical insulation interface at different positions.
图 11 (a)不同温度下Si/Ag双层膜Si侧、Ag侧的Seebeck系数; (b) 300 K有Pt不同镀银厚度下Bi/Ag双层膜Bi侧、Ag侧的Seebeck系数
Fig. 11. (a) Seebeck coefficients of Si/Ag bilayer films on Si side and Ag side at different temperatures; (b) Seebeck coefficient of Bi/Ag bilayer film on Bi side and Ag side at different silver plating thickness of Pt at 300 K.
表 1 室温下双层膜正面及反面Seebeck系数测量结果
Table 1. Measurement results of Seebeck coefficient on front and back of the bilayered thin films at room temperature.
n-Si Ag/n-Si SI-Si Ag/SI-Si Cu/n-Si Cu/n-Si 正面/(µV·K–1) –430 –1.25 –3.33×104 –2.78×10–1 –7.83 –8.02 反面/(µV·K–1) –416 –218.75 –3.24×104 –3.89×104 –401 –415 表 2 Si, Cu, Ag, Bi的材料参数
Table 2. Material parameters of Si, Cu, Ag and Bi.
名称 Si Cu Ag Bi 相对介电常数(1) 11.7 1 — — 导热系数/(W·m–1·K–1) 131 400 — — 密度/(kg·m–3) 2329 8700 — — 常压热容/(J·kg–1·K–1) 700 385 — — 电导率/(S·m–1) 2.52×10–4 5.998×107 1.01×107 5.77×105 Seebeck系数/(V·K–1) –0.45×10–3 –3.33×10–6 5.81×10–6 –6.36×10–5 -
[1] 陈立东, 刘睿恒, 史讯 2017 热电材料与器件 (北京: 科学出版社) 第1页
Chen L D, Liu R H, Shi X 2017 Thermoelectric Materials and Devices (Beijing: Science Press) p1
[2] Mizue M, Masashi M, Kimihiro O 2013 J. Micromech. Microeng. 23 115016Google Scholar
[3] Nouredine O, Alain P, Abdelkhalek K, Khalid H 2023 Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 98 29Google Scholar
[4] Ihtesham C, Ravi P, Kelly L, Gregory C, Sridhar N, Ravi M, David K, Randall A, Rama V 2009 Nat. Nanotechnol. 4 235Google Scholar
[5] Yang C, Souchay D, Knei M, et al. 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 16076Google Scholar
[6] Pilaipon N, Rachsak S, Mati H, Aparporn S 2017 J. Electron. Mater. 4 66444Google Scholar
[7] Yordanov P, Wochner P, Ibrahimkutty S, Dietl C, Wrobel F, Felici R, Gregori G, Maier J, Keimer B, Habermeier H U 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 253101Google Scholar
[8] Gromova D G, Shterna Y I, Rogacheva M S, Shulyat’eva A S, Kirilenkoa E P, Shterna M Y, Fedorovb V A, Mikhailovaa M S 2016 Inorg. Mater. 52 1132Google Scholar
[9] Hinterleitner B, Knapp I, Poneder M, et al. 2019 Nature 576 85Google Scholar
[10] Masaaki I, Hironori A, Daisuke T, Jiro K 2019 Electr. Eng. Jpn. 208 10Google Scholar
[11] Ju H, Kim J 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 35354Google Scholar
[12] Liu S Y, Peng S J, Ma J, Li G J, Qin X S, Li M M, Wang Q 2017 Superlattice. Microst. 104 282Google Scholar
[13] Tani J I, Ishikawa H 2023 Mater. Lett. 331 133460Google Scholar
[14] Tian K, Tiwar A 2019 Sci. Rep. 9 3133Google Scholar
[15] Usop R, Hasnan M M I M, Mohamad M, Ahmad M K, Said S M, Salleh F 2022 Micromachines. Basel. 13 2169Google Scholar
[16] Stevens D L, Ortiz A, Cho C, Gamage G A, Ren Z F, Grunlan J C 2021 Appl. Phys. Lett. 118 151904Google Scholar
[17] Sumino M, Harada K, Ikeda M, Tanaka S, Miyazaki K, Adachi C 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 118 093308Google Scholar
[18] Nordheim V L, Gorter C J 1935 Physics 2 383Google Scholar
[19] Ho T L, Ding K, Lyapunov N, Suen C H, Wong L W, Zhao J, Yang M, Zhou X, Dai J Y 2022 Nanomaterials. Basel. 12 2128Google Scholar
[20] Hinterleitner B, Knapp I, Poneder M, et al. 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 191911Google Scholar
[21] Bhogra A, Masarrat A, Hasina D, Meena R, Kumar A, Som T, Dong C L, Chen C L, Kandasami A 2021 Mater. Lett. 282 128880Google Scholar
[22] Koga T, Cronin S B, Dresselhaus M S, Liu J L, Wang K L 2000 Appl. Phys. Lett. 77 1490Google Scholar
[23] Heinze S, Habermeier H U, Cristiani G, Canosa S B, Tacon M L, Keimer B 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 131603Google Scholar
[24] Meng J H, Wu H C, Gao D Y, Zhang K, Gui L, Yan W M 2020 Energy 217 119360
[25] Chen L, Lee J 2015 Appl. Energ. 150 138Google Scholar
计量
- 文章访问数: 2153
- PDF下载量: 53
- 被引次数: 0