搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于R矩阵理论的气体分子弹性碰撞截面计算及其与绝缘强度关联分析

张兴义 杨帅 尚述祥 吴少博 王航 肖集雄

引用本文:
Citation:

基于R矩阵理论的气体分子弹性碰撞截面计算及其与绝缘强度关联分析

张兴义, 杨帅, 尚述祥, 吴少博, 王航, 肖集雄
cstr: 32037.14.aps.73.20241355

R-matrix theory based calculation of elastic cross-sections of gas molecules and analysis of its correlation with insulation strength

Zhang Xing-Yi, Yang Shuai, Shang Shu-Xiang, Wu Shao-Bo, Wang Hang, Xiao Ji-Xiong
cstr: 32037.14.aps.73.20241355
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 弹性碰撞截面是研究粒子间相互作用的关键参数之一, 有助于揭示气体绝缘的微观机理. 本文基于 R 矩阵理论计算了24种气体分子在0—15 eV下的弹性碰撞截面, 提取了最低共振态能量、峰值等截面特征参数. 对比了SF6, CF2Cl2, i-C3F7CN碰撞截面的计算值与实验值, 首次给出了i-C3F7CN在0—1 eV的低能碰撞截面; 分析了F取代和碳链长度对截面参数的影响, 最终研究了截面特征与绝缘强度间的关联性. 结果表明, 计算得到的各分子最低shape共振态能量与现有研究数据一致, 均方误差为0.181; F取代时, 共振态能量逐渐增大、峰值逐渐减小; 碳链延长则与之相反. 分子最低共振态能量、截面峰值与气体绝缘强度有较强关联, 分子的最低共振态能量越低, 对应的截面峰值越大, 其绝缘强度越高. 通过分析分子中低能弹性碰撞截面特征, 可定性评估气体绝缘强度.
    The elastic collision cross-section is a key parameter in the study of inter-particle interactions, and it helps to reveal the microscopic mechanism of gas insulation. For this reason, based on the R -matrix theory, the elastic collision cross-sections of 24 gas molecules at 0–15 eV are calculated , and cross-section characteristic parameters of the lowest resonance state energy and its peak are extracted. Then the calculated and experimental values of SF6, CF2Cl2, and i-C3F7CN cross-sections are compared, and the low-energy cross-section data of i-C3F7CN at 0–1 eV are given. Furthermore the effects of Cl-substitution and carbon chain length on the cross-section parameters are analysed. Finally the correlation between cross-section characteristic parameters and insulation strength is investigated. The results show that the lowest shape resonance state energy for each molecule is in better agreement with the existing data within a mean square error of 0.181. For the F-substitution, the resonance energy gradually increases but the peak value gradually decreases, which the carbon chain extension is the opposite to: the resonance state energy gradually decreases but the peak value gradually increases. The lowest resonance energy and peak value are strongly related to the insulation strength. The lower its lowest resonance energy and the larger the corresponding peak value, the higher the molecular insulation strength is. The relevant data can theoretically supplement existing experimental data. This study provides low energy cross-section properties of various insulating gas molecules, which can be useful for qualitatively evaluating the insulating properties of gas molecules and quickly screening SF6 alternative gases.
      通信作者: 杨帅, ys3254@163.com
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 52007053)和湖北省自然科学基金(批准号: 2019CFB144)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Yang Shuai, ys3254@163.com
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52007053) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province, China (Grant No. 2019CFB144).
    [1]

    满林坤, 邓云坤, 肖登明 2017 高电压技术 43 788Google Scholar

    Man L K, Deng Y K, Xiao D M 2017 High Voltage Eng. 43 788Google Scholar

    [2]

    田双双, 张晓星, 肖淞, 卓然, 王邸博, 邓载韬, 李祎 2018 中国电机工程学报 38 3125Google Scholar

    Tian S S, Zhang X X, Xiao S, Zhuo R, Wang D B, Deng Z T, Li Y 2018 Proc. CSEE 38 3125Google Scholar

    [3]

    胡世卓, 周文俊, 郑宇, 喻剑辉, 张天然, 王凌志 2019 高电压技术 45 3562Google Scholar

    Hu S Z, Zhou W J, Zheng Y, Yu J H, Zhang T R, Wang L Z 2019 High Voltage Eng. 45 3562Google Scholar

    [4]

    熊嘉宇, 张博雅, 李兴文, 杨韬, 徐宁 2021 中国电机工程学报 41 759Google Scholar

    Xiong J Y, Zhang B Y, Li X W, Yang T, Xu N 2021 Proc. CSEE 41 759Google Scholar

    [5]

    郑宇, 周文俊, 朱太云, 任书波, 喻剑辉 2023 高电压技术 49 946Google Scholar

    Zheng Y, Zhou W J, Zhu T Y, Ren S B, Yu J H 2023 High Voltage Eng. 49 946Google Scholar

    [6]

    宋佳洁, 李晓昂, 吕玉芳, 袁勰雨, 张乔根, 苏镇西 2020 高电压技术 46 1372Google Scholar

    Song J J, Li X A, Lü Y F, Yuan X Y, Zhang Q G, Su Z X 2020 High Voltage Eng. 46 1372Google Scholar

    [7]

    张震, 林莘, 余伟成, 徐建源, 张佳, 苏镇西 2020 高电压技术 46 250Google Scholar

    Zhang Z, Lin X, Yu W C, Xu J Y, Zhang J, Su Z X 2020 High Voltage Eng. 46 250Google Scholar

    [8]

    王宝山, 余小娟, 侯华, 周文俊, 罗运柏 2020 电工技术学报 35 21Google Scholar

    Wang B S, Yu X J, Hou H, Zhou W J, Luo Y B 2020 Trans. Chin. Electr. Soc. 35 21Google Scholar

    [9]

    张闹闹, 杨帅, 刘关平, 王航, 肖集雄 2022 高电压技术 48 4323Google Scholar

    Zhang N N, Yang S, Liu G P, Wang H, Xiao J X 2022 High Voltage Eng. 48 4323Google Scholar

    [10]

    刘关平, 杨帅, 张闹闹, 王航, 肖集雄 2022 高电压技术 48 2208Google Scholar

    Liu G P, Yang S, Zhang N N, Wang H, Xiao J X 2022 High Voltage Eng. 48 2208Google Scholar

    [11]

    Zhang X Y, Yang S, Liu G P, Wu R, Wu S B 2023 J. Mol. Model. 29 224Google Scholar

    [12]

    李鑫涛, 林莘, 徐建源, 李璐维, 陈会利 2017 电工技术学报 32 42Google Scholar

    Li X T, Lin S, Xu J Y, Li L W, Chen H L 2017 Trans. Chin. Electr. Soc. 32 42Google Scholar

    [13]

    孙安邦, 李晗蔚, 许鹏, 张冠军 2017 物理学报 66 195101Google Scholar

    Sun A B, Li H W, Xu P, Zhang G J 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 195101Google Scholar

    [14]

    Lucchese R R, Gianturco F A 1996 Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 15 429Google Scholar

    [15]

    Berrington K A, Eissner W B, Norrington P H 1995 Comput. Phys. Commun. 92 290Google Scholar

    [16]

    Burke P G, Noble C J, Burke V M 2006 Adv. Atom. Mol. Opt. Phy. 54 237Google Scholar

    [17]

    Schneider B I, Rescigno T N 1988 Phys. Rev. A 37 3749Google Scholar

    [18]

    Takatsuka T, McKoy V 1981 Phys. Rev. A 24 2473Google Scholar

    [19]

    Meyer H D 1994 Chem. Phys. Lett. 223 465Google Scholar

    [20]

    Wang K D, Meng J, Liu Y F, Sun J F 2015 J. Phys. B-At. Mol. Opt. 48 155202Google Scholar

    [21]

    Epée E D M, Motapon O, Darby-Lewis D, Tennyson J 2017 J. Phys. B-At. Mol. Opt. 50 115203Google Scholar

    [22]

    Alexandra L, Jimena D G 2019 J. Chem. Phys. 150 064307Google Scholar

    [23]

    Carr J M, Galiatsatos P G, Gorfinkiel J D, Harvey A G, Lysaght M A, Madden D, Mašín Z, Plummer M, Tennyson J, Varambhia H N 2012 Eur. Phys. J. D 66 58Google Scholar

    [24]

    Tennyson J 2010 Phys. Rep. 491 29Google Scholar

    [25]

    Wigner E P 1946 Phys. Rev. 70 15Google Scholar

    [26]

    Burke P G, Hibbert A, Robb W D 1971 J. Phys. B-At Mol. Opt. 4 153Google Scholar

    [27]

    Bai J Z, Ban Y, Bian J G, Cai X, Chang J F, Chen H F, Chen H S, Chen J, Chen J, Chen J C, Chen Y B, Chi S P 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 022001Google Scholar

    [28]

    Fabrikant I I, Eden S, Mason N J 2017 Adv. Atom. Mol. Opt. Phy. 66 545Google Scholar

    [29]

    Thodika M, Mackouse N, Matsika S 2020 J. Phys. Chem. A 124 9011Google Scholar

    [30]

    Schulz G J 1973 Rev. Mod. Phys. 45 423Google Scholar

    [31]

    CCCBDB http://cccbdb.nist.gov [2024-9-25]

    [32]

    Frisch M J, Trucks G W, Schlegel H B 2017 Gaussian 16 Users Reference (Wallingford USA: Gaussian) pp33–57

    [33]

    Chen R, Zhang L, Luo X L, Liang G M 2021 Comput. Theor. Chem. 1203 11348Google Scholar

    [34]

    Bach R D, Schlegel H B 2021 J. Phys. Chem. A. 125 5014Google Scholar

    [35]

    Goswami B, Antony B 2014 RSC Adv. 4 30953Google Scholar

    [36]

    Limao-Vieira P, Blanco F, Oller J C, Muñoz A, Pérez J M, Vinodkumar M, García G, Mason N J 2005 Phys. Rev. A 71 2720Google Scholar

    [37]

    Christophorou L G, Olthoff J K 2000 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 29 267Google Scholar

    [38]

    Kennerlya R E, Bonham R A, McMillan M 1979 J. Chem. Phys. 70 2039Google Scholar

    [39]

    Makochekanwa C, Kimura M, Sueoka O 2004 Phys. Rev. A 70 022702Google Scholar

    [40]

    Dababneh M S, Hsieh Y F, Kauppila W E 1988 Phys. Rev. A 38 1207Google Scholar

    [41]

    Wang C L, Bridgette C, Wang Y, Sun H, Tennyson J 2021 J. Phys. B-At. Mol. Opt. 54 025202Google Scholar

    [42]

    夏涵怡, 杨帅, 王航, 肖集雄 2023 高电压技术 49 4563Google Scholar

    Xia H Y, Yang S, Wang H, Xiao J X 2023 High Voltage Eng. 49 4563Google Scholar

    [43]

    Christophorou L G, Olthoff J K, Wang Y 2009 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 26 1205Google Scholar

    [44]

    Jones R K 1986 J. Chem. Phys. 84 813Google Scholar

    [45]

    Underwood-Lemons T, Winkler D C, Tossell J A, Moore J H 1994 J. Chem. Phys. 100 9117Google Scholar

    [46]

    Zhang J W, Sinha N, Jiang M, Wang H G, Li Y D, Antony B, Liu C L 2022 IEEE T. Dielect. El. In. 29 1005Google Scholar

    [47]

    Hitchcock A P, Tronc M, Modelli A 1989 J. ChemInform. 20 3068Google Scholar

    [48]

    Devins J 1980 IEEE T. El. In. 15 81Google Scholar

    [49]

    Sanche L, Schulz G J 1973 J. Chem. Phys. 58 479Google Scholar

    [50]

    Berman M, Hernan E, Cederbaum L S 1983 Phys. Rev. A 28 1363Google Scholar

    [51]

    Ehrhardt H, Langhans L, Linder F 1968 Phys. Rev. 173 222Google Scholar

    [52]

    Hien X P, Jeon B, Tuan A D 2013 J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 82 03430Google Scholar

    [53]

    Ishii I, McLaren R, Hitchcock A P 1988 Can. J. Chem. 66 2104Google Scholar

    [54]

    Thynne J C J, Harland P W 1973 Int. J. Mass Spectrom 11 399Google Scholar

    [55]

    Burrow P D, Modelli A, Chiu N S 1982 J. Chem. Phys. 77 2699Google Scholar

    [56]

    Jordan D K, Burrow D P 1987 Chem. Rev. 87 557Google Scholar

    [57]

    Harland P W, Thynne J C J 1957 Int. J. Mass Spectrom 10 11Google Scholar

    [58]

    Fieller E C, Hartley H O, Pearson E S 1957 Biometrika 44 470Google Scholar

  • 图 1  R矩阵内外区划分示意图

    Fig. 1.  Schematic diagram of dividing the inner and outer of the R-matrix method.

    图 2  SF6分子shape共振和core-excited共振

    Fig. 2.  SF6 molecular shape resonance and core-excited resonance.

    图 3  SF6计算结果 (a) 弹性碰撞截面; (b)本征相位曲线图

    Fig. 3.  Calculation results of SF6: (a) Elastic collision cross-section; (b) eigenphases diagrams.

    图 4  CF2Cl2计算结果 (a) 弹性碰撞截面; (b)本征相位曲线图

    Fig. 4.  Calculation results of CF2Cl2: (a) Elastic collision cross-section; (b) eigenphases diagrams.

    图 5  i-C3F7CN计算结果 (a) 弹性碰撞截面; (b)本征相位曲线图

    Fig. 5.  Calculation results of i-C3F7CN: (a) Elastic collision cross-section; (b) eigenphases diagrams.

    图 6  F取代分子的计算结果 (a) 弹性碰撞截面; (b)本征相位曲线图

    Fig. 6.  Calculation results of F-substituted molecules: (a) Elastic collision cross-section; (b) eigenphases diagrams.

    图 8  截面特征参数随绝缘强度变化的趋势图 (a) F取代; (b) 延长碳链; (c) 24 种分子散点图

    Fig. 8.  Trend of cross-section characteristic parameters with insulation strength: (a) F-substituted molecules; (b) carbon chain extended molecules; (c) 24 molecular scatter plots.

    图 7  碳链延长分子的计算结果 (a) 弹性碰撞截面; (b)本征相位曲线图

    Fig. 7.  Calculation results of carbon chain extended molecules: (a) Elastic collision cross-section; (b) eigenphases diagrams.

    表 1  0—1.0 eV范围i-C3F7CN的碰撞截面

    Table 1.  Collision cross-section of i-C3F7CN in the range of 0–1.0 eV.

    能量/eV碰撞截面/
    (10–16 cm2)
    能量/eV碰撞截面/
    (10–16 cm2)
    0.01658.580.4071.53
    0.03227.430.4564.89
    0.05143.860.5062.12
    0.07106.450.5559.14
    0.0988.120.6057.83
    0.1084.860.6555.08
    0.1295.240.7052.86
    0.15230.070.7552.25
    0.16262.530.8051.21
    0.17241.620.8549.85
    0.19179.530.9049.37
    0.21135.730.9548.59
    0.23115.261.0047.95
    0.25105.811.0547.36
    0.2794.791.1049.97
    0.3090.091.1483.43
    0.3579.551.1571.23
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  基于R矩阵计算的分子碰撞截面特征参数与分子相对绝缘强度数据

    Table 2.  Characteristic parameters of molecular cross-sections based on R-matrix method and relative insulating strength.

    分子 最低共振态
    位置/eV
    实验值或
    计算值/eV
    峰值/
    (10–16 cm2)
    Er 分子 最低共振态
    位置/eV
    实验值或
    计算值/eV
    峰值/
    (10–16 cm2)
    Er
    CO2 3.33 3.14[49] 35.08 0.35 CF4 8.02 8.87[44] 27.67 0.41
    N2 1.81 2.32[50] 65.81 0.38 C2F6 4.90 4.60[53] 39.10 0.78
    CO 1.62 1.50[51] 73.01 0.40 C3F8 3.73 3.34[53] 51.50 0.98
    BF3 3.46 3.88[52] 22.23 0.40 C4F10 2.81 2.37[53] 68.10 1.36
    N2O 1.03 2.34[49] 100.21 0.47 C5F12 1.68 1.64[53] 76.69 1.75
    SF6 0.72 0.85[42] 60.66 1.00 SO2 4.40 2.87[49] 19.88 1.00
    i-C3F7CN 0.16 0.14[42] 262.53 2.20 CFCl3 0.20 0.26[42] 241.77 1.72
    CF3Cl 1.65 2.00[44] 47.67 0.53 CF2Cl2 0.96 1.02[42] 63.59 1.10
    CCl4 0.12 ~0.0[43] 306.07 2.36 CH3CN 2.73 2.82[47] 64.72 0.80
    C2F5CN 0.69 1.40[54] 109.81 2.18 CH2Cl2 0.98 1.23[55] 81.98 0.60
    CH3Cl 3.14 3.45[55] 33.96 0.31 CHCl3 0.33 0.35[55] 184.43 1.67
    C2H2 2.65 2.60[56] 54.70 0.42 c-C4F8 0.55 0.45[57] 73.36 1.25
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    满林坤, 邓云坤, 肖登明 2017 高电压技术 43 788Google Scholar

    Man L K, Deng Y K, Xiao D M 2017 High Voltage Eng. 43 788Google Scholar

    [2]

    田双双, 张晓星, 肖淞, 卓然, 王邸博, 邓载韬, 李祎 2018 中国电机工程学报 38 3125Google Scholar

    Tian S S, Zhang X X, Xiao S, Zhuo R, Wang D B, Deng Z T, Li Y 2018 Proc. CSEE 38 3125Google Scholar

    [3]

    胡世卓, 周文俊, 郑宇, 喻剑辉, 张天然, 王凌志 2019 高电压技术 45 3562Google Scholar

    Hu S Z, Zhou W J, Zheng Y, Yu J H, Zhang T R, Wang L Z 2019 High Voltage Eng. 45 3562Google Scholar

    [4]

    熊嘉宇, 张博雅, 李兴文, 杨韬, 徐宁 2021 中国电机工程学报 41 759Google Scholar

    Xiong J Y, Zhang B Y, Li X W, Yang T, Xu N 2021 Proc. CSEE 41 759Google Scholar

    [5]

    郑宇, 周文俊, 朱太云, 任书波, 喻剑辉 2023 高电压技术 49 946Google Scholar

    Zheng Y, Zhou W J, Zhu T Y, Ren S B, Yu J H 2023 High Voltage Eng. 49 946Google Scholar

    [6]

    宋佳洁, 李晓昂, 吕玉芳, 袁勰雨, 张乔根, 苏镇西 2020 高电压技术 46 1372Google Scholar

    Song J J, Li X A, Lü Y F, Yuan X Y, Zhang Q G, Su Z X 2020 High Voltage Eng. 46 1372Google Scholar

    [7]

    张震, 林莘, 余伟成, 徐建源, 张佳, 苏镇西 2020 高电压技术 46 250Google Scholar

    Zhang Z, Lin X, Yu W C, Xu J Y, Zhang J, Su Z X 2020 High Voltage Eng. 46 250Google Scholar

    [8]

    王宝山, 余小娟, 侯华, 周文俊, 罗运柏 2020 电工技术学报 35 21Google Scholar

    Wang B S, Yu X J, Hou H, Zhou W J, Luo Y B 2020 Trans. Chin. Electr. Soc. 35 21Google Scholar

    [9]

    张闹闹, 杨帅, 刘关平, 王航, 肖集雄 2022 高电压技术 48 4323Google Scholar

    Zhang N N, Yang S, Liu G P, Wang H, Xiao J X 2022 High Voltage Eng. 48 4323Google Scholar

    [10]

    刘关平, 杨帅, 张闹闹, 王航, 肖集雄 2022 高电压技术 48 2208Google Scholar

    Liu G P, Yang S, Zhang N N, Wang H, Xiao J X 2022 High Voltage Eng. 48 2208Google Scholar

    [11]

    Zhang X Y, Yang S, Liu G P, Wu R, Wu S B 2023 J. Mol. Model. 29 224Google Scholar

    [12]

    李鑫涛, 林莘, 徐建源, 李璐维, 陈会利 2017 电工技术学报 32 42Google Scholar

    Li X T, Lin S, Xu J Y, Li L W, Chen H L 2017 Trans. Chin. Electr. Soc. 32 42Google Scholar

    [13]

    孙安邦, 李晗蔚, 许鹏, 张冠军 2017 物理学报 66 195101Google Scholar

    Sun A B, Li H W, Xu P, Zhang G J 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 195101Google Scholar

    [14]

    Lucchese R R, Gianturco F A 1996 Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 15 429Google Scholar

    [15]

    Berrington K A, Eissner W B, Norrington P H 1995 Comput. Phys. Commun. 92 290Google Scholar

    [16]

    Burke P G, Noble C J, Burke V M 2006 Adv. Atom. Mol. Opt. Phy. 54 237Google Scholar

    [17]

    Schneider B I, Rescigno T N 1988 Phys. Rev. A 37 3749Google Scholar

    [18]

    Takatsuka T, McKoy V 1981 Phys. Rev. A 24 2473Google Scholar

    [19]

    Meyer H D 1994 Chem. Phys. Lett. 223 465Google Scholar

    [20]

    Wang K D, Meng J, Liu Y F, Sun J F 2015 J. Phys. B-At. Mol. Opt. 48 155202Google Scholar

    [21]

    Epée E D M, Motapon O, Darby-Lewis D, Tennyson J 2017 J. Phys. B-At. Mol. Opt. 50 115203Google Scholar

    [22]

    Alexandra L, Jimena D G 2019 J. Chem. Phys. 150 064307Google Scholar

    [23]

    Carr J M, Galiatsatos P G, Gorfinkiel J D, Harvey A G, Lysaght M A, Madden D, Mašín Z, Plummer M, Tennyson J, Varambhia H N 2012 Eur. Phys. J. D 66 58Google Scholar

    [24]

    Tennyson J 2010 Phys. Rep. 491 29Google Scholar

    [25]

    Wigner E P 1946 Phys. Rev. 70 15Google Scholar

    [26]

    Burke P G, Hibbert A, Robb W D 1971 J. Phys. B-At Mol. Opt. 4 153Google Scholar

    [27]

    Bai J Z, Ban Y, Bian J G, Cai X, Chang J F, Chen H F, Chen H S, Chen J, Chen J, Chen J C, Chen Y B, Chi S P 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 022001Google Scholar

    [28]

    Fabrikant I I, Eden S, Mason N J 2017 Adv. Atom. Mol. Opt. Phy. 66 545Google Scholar

    [29]

    Thodika M, Mackouse N, Matsika S 2020 J. Phys. Chem. A 124 9011Google Scholar

    [30]

    Schulz G J 1973 Rev. Mod. Phys. 45 423Google Scholar

    [31]

    CCCBDB http://cccbdb.nist.gov [2024-9-25]

    [32]

    Frisch M J, Trucks G W, Schlegel H B 2017 Gaussian 16 Users Reference (Wallingford USA: Gaussian) pp33–57

    [33]

    Chen R, Zhang L, Luo X L, Liang G M 2021 Comput. Theor. Chem. 1203 11348Google Scholar

    [34]

    Bach R D, Schlegel H B 2021 J. Phys. Chem. A. 125 5014Google Scholar

    [35]

    Goswami B, Antony B 2014 RSC Adv. 4 30953Google Scholar

    [36]

    Limao-Vieira P, Blanco F, Oller J C, Muñoz A, Pérez J M, Vinodkumar M, García G, Mason N J 2005 Phys. Rev. A 71 2720Google Scholar

    [37]

    Christophorou L G, Olthoff J K 2000 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 29 267Google Scholar

    [38]

    Kennerlya R E, Bonham R A, McMillan M 1979 J. Chem. Phys. 70 2039Google Scholar

    [39]

    Makochekanwa C, Kimura M, Sueoka O 2004 Phys. Rev. A 70 022702Google Scholar

    [40]

    Dababneh M S, Hsieh Y F, Kauppila W E 1988 Phys. Rev. A 38 1207Google Scholar

    [41]

    Wang C L, Bridgette C, Wang Y, Sun H, Tennyson J 2021 J. Phys. B-At. Mol. Opt. 54 025202Google Scholar

    [42]

    夏涵怡, 杨帅, 王航, 肖集雄 2023 高电压技术 49 4563Google Scholar

    Xia H Y, Yang S, Wang H, Xiao J X 2023 High Voltage Eng. 49 4563Google Scholar

    [43]

    Christophorou L G, Olthoff J K, Wang Y 2009 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 26 1205Google Scholar

    [44]

    Jones R K 1986 J. Chem. Phys. 84 813Google Scholar

    [45]

    Underwood-Lemons T, Winkler D C, Tossell J A, Moore J H 1994 J. Chem. Phys. 100 9117Google Scholar

    [46]

    Zhang J W, Sinha N, Jiang M, Wang H G, Li Y D, Antony B, Liu C L 2022 IEEE T. Dielect. El. In. 29 1005Google Scholar

    [47]

    Hitchcock A P, Tronc M, Modelli A 1989 J. ChemInform. 20 3068Google Scholar

    [48]

    Devins J 1980 IEEE T. El. In. 15 81Google Scholar

    [49]

    Sanche L, Schulz G J 1973 J. Chem. Phys. 58 479Google Scholar

    [50]

    Berman M, Hernan E, Cederbaum L S 1983 Phys. Rev. A 28 1363Google Scholar

    [51]

    Ehrhardt H, Langhans L, Linder F 1968 Phys. Rev. 173 222Google Scholar

    [52]

    Hien X P, Jeon B, Tuan A D 2013 J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 82 03430Google Scholar

    [53]

    Ishii I, McLaren R, Hitchcock A P 1988 Can. J. Chem. 66 2104Google Scholar

    [54]

    Thynne J C J, Harland P W 1973 Int. J. Mass Spectrom 11 399Google Scholar

    [55]

    Burrow P D, Modelli A, Chiu N S 1982 J. Chem. Phys. 77 2699Google Scholar

    [56]

    Jordan D K, Burrow D P 1987 Chem. Rev. 87 557Google Scholar

    [57]

    Harland P W, Thynne J C J 1957 Int. J. Mass Spectrom 10 11Google Scholar

    [58]

    Fieller E C, Hartley H O, Pearson E S 1957 Biometrika 44 470Google Scholar

  • [1] 李炅远, 孟举, 王克栋. $ {{\mathrm{C}}}_{4}^{-} $离子的低能电子弹性散射研究: 共振态与同分异构. 物理学报, 2024, 73(24): 243401. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20241377
    [2] 王晓伟, 郭建友. 复动量格林函数方法对n-α散射研究. 物理学报, 2019, 68(9): 092101. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182197
    [3] 朱冰, 冯灏. 运用R矩阵方法研究低能电子与NO2分子的散射. 物理学报, 2017, 66(24): 243401. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.243401
    [4] 费宏明, 周飞, 杨毅彪, 梁九卿. 光子晶体双量子阱的共振隧穿. 物理学报, 2011, 60(7): 074225. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.074225
    [5] 孙长平, 王国利, 周效信. F3+和Ne4+离子的光电离截面的理论计算. 物理学报, 2011, 60(5): 053202. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.053202
    [6] 余春日, 江贵生, 张杰. He原子与HI分子碰撞截面的密耦计算. 物理学报, 2009, 58(4): 2376-2381. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.2376
    [7] 张洪英, 陈德应, 鲁振中, 樊荣伟, 夏元钦. Ba-Sr系统激光感生碰撞能量转移的数值计算. 物理学报, 2008, 57(12): 7600-7605. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.7600
    [8] 张 力, 周善贵, 孟 杰, 赵恩广. 单粒子共振态的实稳定方法研究. 物理学报, 2007, 56(7): 3839-3844. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.3839
    [9] 姚细林, 王新兵, 赖建军. 微空心阴极放电的Monte Carlo模拟研究. 物理学报, 2003, 52(6): 1450-1454. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.1450
    [10] 刘家瑞, 雷子明, 杨锋, 潘广炎, 于德洪, 孙湘. 单、双电荷离子与原子碰撞中的激发态和发射截面比较. 物理学报, 1988, 37(8): 1254-1259. doi: 10.7498/aps.37.1254
    [11] 许伯威. KK和KK共振态. 物理学报, 1966, 22(7): 840-841. doi: 10.7498/aps.22.840
    [12] 武尚賢, 黄五羣, 许伯威. 关于Kπ共振态. 物理学报, 1966, 22(8): 961-966. doi: 10.7498/aps.22.961
    [13] 葛墨林, 段一士. π-π共振态. 物理学报, 1966, 22(6): 724-728. doi: 10.7498/aps.22.724
    [14] 许伯威. 二粒子共振态的质量公式. 物理学报, 1965, 21(10): 1814-1816. doi: 10.7498/aps.21.1814
    [15] 高崇寿. 关于πω(1220)共振态和K10K±π?(1410)共振态. 物理学报, 1965, 21(2): 465-468. doi: 10.7498/aps.21.465
    [16] 叶芃生. 重子共振态的选择规则. 物理学报, 1965, 21(11): 1924-1926. doi: 10.7498/aps.21.1924
    [17] 许伯威. K-π共振态. 物理学报, 1965, 21(1): 221-222. doi: 10.7498/aps.21.221
    [18] 葛墨林, 段一士. 关于π-π共振态. 物理学报, 1965, 21(11): 1903-1912. doi: 10.7498/aps.21.1903
    [19] 高崇寿. 偶同位旋π-π共振态质量的经验公式. 物理学报, 1964, 20(7): 680-681. doi: 10.7498/aps.20.680
    [20] 许伯威, 孔凡梅, 宫学惠. K—K共振态. 物理学报, 1964, 20(11): 1129-1134. doi: 10.7498/aps.20.1129
计量
  • 文章访问数:  336
  • PDF下载量:  12
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-09-26
  • 修回日期:  2024-11-11
  • 上网日期:  2024-11-20
  • 刊出日期:  2024-12-20

/

返回文章
返回