-
应用反应力场分子动力学方法, 模拟了单层氧化石墨烯在径向压缩作用下的褶皱过程, 研究了含氧基团(羟基、环氧基)对氧化石墨烯褶皱行为以及褶皱球结构稳定性的影响. 当石墨烯仅含羟基时, 该类氧化石墨烯呈现出“推进式”的褶皱行为, 而当石墨烯仅含环氧基时, 该类氧化石墨烯则呈现出片层与片层“贴合式”的褶皱行为. 褶皱行为的不同决定了氧化石墨烯最终褶皱球结构的差异. 通过分析原子级势能增量分布与C—C成、断键位置之间的关系, 发现氧化石墨烯上C—C成、断键主要发生在变形较为严重的区域, 且相较于羟基, 环氧基对与其连接的C—C键具有更强的削弱作用. 为了研究氧化石墨烯褶皱球的结构稳定性, 模拟了其在无约束条件下的释放过程. 发现氧化石墨烯褶皱球的结构稳定性取决于其中C—C成、断键数量, 即C—C成、断键的数量越多, 结构越稳定, 且在同一氧化率下, 褶皱球的结构稳定性随环氧基比例的增大而提高. 本研究表明, 通过改变氧化石墨烯片层上含氧基团的相对比例, 可实现对其褶皱球稳定性的控制.Graphene has a wide range of applications in the fields of electricity, chemistry, biomedicine, and lubrication. But the strong van der Waals interaction between graphene sheets makes it easy to aggregate in preparation process, difficult to produce and put into practical applcation on a large-scale. There are many methods to prevent the graphene sheets from aggregating, such as reducing the size of sheets, adjusting the interaction between solvent and graphene, and using dispersant. Another possible method is to turn the sheet graphene into a three-dimensional structure like the crumpled paper. Compared with sheet graphene, the crumpled graphene ball has excellent aggregation-resistant. The current research on crumpled graphene ball mainly focuses on the effect of the initial structure of graphene sheet on the structure stability of the crumpled ball, but rarely involves the effect of functional groups. In this paper, ReaxFF molecular dynamics is used to simulate the crumpling process of graphene oxide sheet. The effect of functional groups (hydroxyl, epoxy) on the crumpling behavior and the stability of the crumpled ball of graphene oxide are studied. Graphene sheet oxidized by hydroxyl exhibits a push-up crumpling behavior. Graphene sheet oxidized by epoxy exhibits a layer-to-layer fitted crumpling behavior. Different crumpling behavior will lead to the difference in final crumpled ball structure. By analyzing the relationship between the atomic level potential energy incremental distribution and the distribution of broken and formed C—C bonds, we find that the broken and formed C—C bonds mainly occur in areas with a large degree of deformation, and the epoxy group has a stronger weakening effect on the C—C bond connected to it than the hydroxyl group. The release process of graphene oxide crumpled ball is simulated to study its structural stability. The stability of graphene oxide crumpled ball depends on the number of the broken and formed C—C bonds, that is, the more the number of broken and formed C—C bonds, the more stable the structure is, and under the same oxidation rate, the stability of the crumpled ball structure increases with the proportion of epoxy groups increasing. This study shows that the stability of graphene oxide crumpled ball structure can be controlled by changing the relative proportion of functional groups.
-
Keywords:
- graphene oxide /
- crumpling behavior /
- stability /
- molecular dynamics simulation
[1] Varshney V, Patnaik S S, Roy A K, Froudakis G, Farmer B L 2010 ACS Nano 4 1153
Google Scholar
[2] Yazyev O V, Louie S G 2010 Nat. Mater. 9 806
Google Scholar
[3] Sakhaee-Pour A 2009 Comput. Mater. Sci. 45 266
Google Scholar
[4] 尹伟红, 韩勤, 杨晓红 2012 物理学报 61 248502
Google Scholar
Yin W H, Han Q, Yang X H 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 248502
Google Scholar
[5] Tozzini V, Pellegrini V 2013 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15 80
Google Scholar
[6] Song Z P, Xu T, Gordin M L, Jiang Y B, Bae I T, Xiao Q F, Zhan H, Liu J, Wang D H 2012 Nano Lett. 12 2205
Google Scholar
[7] Yang X W, Zhu J W, Qiu L, Li D 2011 Adv. Mater. 23 2833
Google Scholar
[8] Tung V C, Allen M J, Yang Y, Kaner R B 2009 Nat. Nanotechnol. 4 25
Google Scholar
[9] Luo J, Cote L J, Tung V C, Tan A T L, Goins P E, Wu J S, Huang J X 2010 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 17667
Google Scholar
[10] Li D, Mueller M B, Gilje S, Kaner R B, Wallace G G 2008 Nat. Nanotechnol. 3 101
Google Scholar
[11] Korkut S, Roy-Mayhew J D, Dabbs D M, Milius D L, Aksay I A 2011 ACS Nano 5 5214
Google Scholar
[12] Hamilton C E, Lomeda J R, Sun Z Z, Tour J M, Barron A R 2009 Nano Lett. 9 3460
Google Scholar
[13] Tallinen T, Astrom J A, Timonen J 2009 Nat. Mater. 8 25
Google Scholar
[14] Matan K, Williams R B, Witten T A, Nagel S R 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 076101
Google Scholar
[15] Lobkovsky A, Gentges S, Li H, Morse D, Witten T A 1995 Science 270 1482
Google Scholar
[16] Luo J Y, Jang H D, Sun T, Xiao L, He Z, Katsoulidis A P, Kanatzidis M G, Gibson J M, Huang J X 2011 ACS Nano 5 8943
Google Scholar
[17] 邓剑锋, 李慧琴, 于帆, 梁齐 2020 物理学报 69 076802
Google Scholar
Deng J F, Li H Q, Yu F, Liang Q 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 076802
Google Scholar
[18] Dou X, Koltonow A R, He X L, Jang H D, Wang Q, Chung Y W, Huang J X 2016 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113 1528
Google Scholar
[19] Cranford S W, Buehler M J 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 205451
Google Scholar
[20] Chang C, Song Z G, Lin J, Xu Z P 2013 RSC Adv. 3 2720
Google Scholar
[21] Becton M, Zhang L Y, Wang X Q 2015 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17 6297
Google Scholar
[22] Becton M, Zhang L Y, Wang X Q 2014 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16 18233
Google Scholar
[23] Baimova J A, Rysaeva L K, Liu B, Dmitriev S V, Zhou K 2015 Phys. Status Solidi B 252 1502
Google Scholar
[24] Baimova J A, Liu B, Dmitriev S V, Zhou K 2015 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 48 095302
Google Scholar
[25] Wan J, Jiang J W, Park H S 2018 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51 015302
Google Scholar
[26] Wang W N, Jiang Y, Biswas P 2012 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 3 3228
Google Scholar
[27] Soler-Crespo R A, Gao W, Xiao P H, Wei X D, Paci J T, Henkelman G, Espinosa H D 2016 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7 2702
Google Scholar
[28] Chenoweth K, van Duin A C T, Goddard W A, 2008 J. Phys. Chem. A 112 1040
Google Scholar
[29] Verma A, Parashar A 2018 Nanotechnology 29 115706
Google Scholar
[30] Meng L J, Jiang J, Wang J L, Ding F 2014 J. Phys. Chem. C 118 720
Google Scholar
[31] Wang L F, Duan F L 2018 Tribol. Int. 123 266
Google Scholar
[32] Li J L, Kudin K N, McAllister M J, Prud'homme R K, Aksay I A, Car R 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 176101
Google Scholar
-
图 1 氧化石墨烯片层在径向压缩作用下褶皱过程示意图
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the crumpling process of graphene oxide sheet under radial compression.
图 2 不同含氧基团比例修饰石墨烯片层的褶皱过程(ϕ = 50%)
Fig. 2. Atomistic configurations during the crumpling process of graphene oxide sheets with various ratios of oxygen functional groups (ϕ = 50%).
图 3 含氧基团类型对石墨烯片层褶皱过程最终结构的影响(ϕ = 50%)
Fig. 3. Final structures resulted from the crumpling process of graphene oxide sheets with σ = 0 and 1 (ϕ = 50%).
图 4 褶皱过程中的势能增量分布、C—C断键和成键原子对位置分布(ϕ = 15%) (a) σ = 0; (b) σ = 1
Fig. 4. Distributions of the potential energy increment and the distribution of broken and formed C—C bonds during the crumpling process of graphene oxide sheets with (a) σ = 0 and (b) σ = 1.
图 5 不同氧化率石墨烯片层褶皱过程的C—C断键、成键数量变化 (a) σ = 0; (b) σ = 1
Fig. 5. Variations in the number of broken and formed C—C bonds during the crumpling process of graphene oxide sheets with (a) σ = 0 and (b) σ = 1.
图 6 不同含氧基团比例石墨烯片层褶皱过程的C—C断键、成键数量变化(ϕ = 50%)
Fig. 6. Variations in the number of broken and formed C—C bonds during the crumpling process of graphene oxide sheets with ϕ = 50%.
图 7 (a) 释放开始时刻的碳原子数密度与释放稳定后的ρg值; (b) 释放开始时刻的C—C断键、成键数量 (σ = 0)
Fig. 7. (a) Number density of C atoms at the beginning of release process and the ρg value at the end of release process; (b) Number of broken and formed C—C bonds at the beginning of release process for the graphene oxide sheets with σ = 0.
图 8 (a) 释放开始时刻的碳原子数密度与释放稳定后的ρg值; (b) 释放开始时刻的C—C断键、成键数量 (ϕ = 50%)
Fig. 8. (a) Number density of C atoms at the beginning of release process and the ρg value at the end of release process; (b) Number of broken and formed C—C bonds at the beginning of release process for the graphene oxide sheets with ϕ = 50%.
-
[1] Varshney V, Patnaik S S, Roy A K, Froudakis G, Farmer B L 2010 ACS Nano 4 1153
Google Scholar
[2] Yazyev O V, Louie S G 2010 Nat. Mater. 9 806
Google Scholar
[3] Sakhaee-Pour A 2009 Comput. Mater. Sci. 45 266
Google Scholar
[4] 尹伟红, 韩勤, 杨晓红 2012 物理学报 61 248502
Google Scholar
Yin W H, Han Q, Yang X H 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 248502
Google Scholar
[5] Tozzini V, Pellegrini V 2013 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15 80
Google Scholar
[6] Song Z P, Xu T, Gordin M L, Jiang Y B, Bae I T, Xiao Q F, Zhan H, Liu J, Wang D H 2012 Nano Lett. 12 2205
Google Scholar
[7] Yang X W, Zhu J W, Qiu L, Li D 2011 Adv. Mater. 23 2833
Google Scholar
[8] Tung V C, Allen M J, Yang Y, Kaner R B 2009 Nat. Nanotechnol. 4 25
Google Scholar
[9] Luo J, Cote L J, Tung V C, Tan A T L, Goins P E, Wu J S, Huang J X 2010 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 17667
Google Scholar
[10] Li D, Mueller M B, Gilje S, Kaner R B, Wallace G G 2008 Nat. Nanotechnol. 3 101
Google Scholar
[11] Korkut S, Roy-Mayhew J D, Dabbs D M, Milius D L, Aksay I A 2011 ACS Nano 5 5214
Google Scholar
[12] Hamilton C E, Lomeda J R, Sun Z Z, Tour J M, Barron A R 2009 Nano Lett. 9 3460
Google Scholar
[13] Tallinen T, Astrom J A, Timonen J 2009 Nat. Mater. 8 25
Google Scholar
[14] Matan K, Williams R B, Witten T A, Nagel S R 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 076101
Google Scholar
[15] Lobkovsky A, Gentges S, Li H, Morse D, Witten T A 1995 Science 270 1482
Google Scholar
[16] Luo J Y, Jang H D, Sun T, Xiao L, He Z, Katsoulidis A P, Kanatzidis M G, Gibson J M, Huang J X 2011 ACS Nano 5 8943
Google Scholar
[17] 邓剑锋, 李慧琴, 于帆, 梁齐 2020 物理学报 69 076802
Google Scholar
Deng J F, Li H Q, Yu F, Liang Q 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 076802
Google Scholar
[18] Dou X, Koltonow A R, He X L, Jang H D, Wang Q, Chung Y W, Huang J X 2016 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113 1528
Google Scholar
[19] Cranford S W, Buehler M J 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 205451
Google Scholar
[20] Chang C, Song Z G, Lin J, Xu Z P 2013 RSC Adv. 3 2720
Google Scholar
[21] Becton M, Zhang L Y, Wang X Q 2015 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17 6297
Google Scholar
[22] Becton M, Zhang L Y, Wang X Q 2014 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16 18233
Google Scholar
[23] Baimova J A, Rysaeva L K, Liu B, Dmitriev S V, Zhou K 2015 Phys. Status Solidi B 252 1502
Google Scholar
[24] Baimova J A, Liu B, Dmitriev S V, Zhou K 2015 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 48 095302
Google Scholar
[25] Wan J, Jiang J W, Park H S 2018 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51 015302
Google Scholar
[26] Wang W N, Jiang Y, Biswas P 2012 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 3 3228
Google Scholar
[27] Soler-Crespo R A, Gao W, Xiao P H, Wei X D, Paci J T, Henkelman G, Espinosa H D 2016 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7 2702
Google Scholar
[28] Chenoweth K, van Duin A C T, Goddard W A, 2008 J. Phys. Chem. A 112 1040
Google Scholar
[29] Verma A, Parashar A 2018 Nanotechnology 29 115706
Google Scholar
[30] Meng L J, Jiang J, Wang J L, Ding F 2014 J. Phys. Chem. C 118 720
Google Scholar
[31] Wang L F, Duan F L 2018 Tribol. Int. 123 266
Google Scholar
[32] Li J L, Kudin K N, McAllister M J, Prud'homme R K, Aksay I A, Car R 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 176101
Google Scholar
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 8974
- PDF下载量: 240
- 被引次数: 0
