搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于近似熵的斯隆数字化巡天中类星体光变复杂性分析

唐洁 刘晓琴

引用本文:
Citation:

基于近似熵的斯隆数字化巡天中类星体光变复杂性分析

唐洁, 刘晓琴

Analysis on complexity of optical variability based on approximate entropy in Sloan digital sky survey quasars

Tang Jie, Liu Xiao-Qin
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 光变是类星体的重要观测特征之一, 类星体在多个波段存在剧烈的光变现象. 光变非常复杂, 具有非线性特征. 以斯隆数字化巡天(Sloan digital sky survey, SDSS) stripe 82天区中的类星体为研究对象, 利用近似熵方法分析了类星体光变的复杂性. 首先应用模拟信号检验了近似熵方法对周期序列、白噪声序列、混沌序列和组合序列的区分能力, 验证了近似熵方法是一种识别不同类型时间序列的有效方法. 再计算了SDSS第7次释放数据中光谱证认过的类星体光变的近似熵, 并分析了它们的复杂性. 结果表明: SDSS类星体光变的近似熵值最大值为0.58, 类星体光变的复杂性介于周期序列和白噪声序列的复杂性之间, 近一半样本的复杂性与混沌序列基本一致.
    Variability is one of the most important observational features of quasars, and it is still not clear that the different quasars show different characteristic variability patterns. The optical variability of quasar is very complex, and optical variability has the non-linear characteristic of complex system. In this paper, the approximate entropy method is employed to analyze the complexities of variability in the Sloan digital sky survey (SDSS) stripe 82 quasars. Firstly, in order to show that the approximate entropy method has the effective ability to distinguish the different types of time sequences, the approximate entropy of periodic sequence, noise sequence, chaotic sequence and their mixed sequences are calculated by using the analog signals. The approximate entropy method proves to be an effective method to identify different types of time sequences. Then, we present the approximate entropy of optical variability of spectroscopically-confirmed quasars from the SDSS data release 7 spectroscopic catalog, and their complexities are analyzed. The results show that the maximum approximate entropy of quasars’ optical variability is only 0.58. The complexity of quasars’ optical variability is between the complexities of periodic sequence and white noise sequence. For nearly half of the samples, the complexities of their optical variability are basically consistent with the complexity of chaotic sequence. Quasars’ optical variability is neither completely periodic nor completely stochastic.
      通信作者: 唐洁, tj168@163.com
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 11373008)、陕西省自然科学基金(批准号: 2016JM1028)和陕西省教育厅科研计划(批准号: 14JK1157)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Tang Jie, tj168@163.com
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11373008), the Program of the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province, China (Grant No. 2016JM1028), and the Scientific Research Program Funded by Shaanxi Provincial Education Department, China (Grant No. 14JK1157).
    [1]

    Fan J H, Zhang Y W, Qian B C, Tao J, Liu Y, Hua T X 2009 Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 181 466Google Scholar

    [2]

    黄克谅 2005 类星体与活动星系核 (北京: 科学出版社) 第3页

    Huang K L 2005 Quasars and Active Galactic Nucleus (Beijing: Science Press) p3 (in Chinese)

    [3]

    Kawaguchi T, Mineshige S, Umemura M 2002 Astrophys. J. 504 671

    [4]

    MacLeod C L, ŽIvezić C S, Kochanek S, Kozłowski B, Kelly E, Bullock A, Kimball B, Sesar D, Westman K B 2010 Astrophys. J. 721 1014Google Scholar

    [5]

    Kasliwal P V, Vogeley S M, Richards T G 2015 Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 451 4328Google Scholar

    [6]

    Guo H X, Wang J X, Cai Z Y, Sun M Y 2017 Astrophys. J. 847 132Google Scholar

    [7]

    Harko T, Leung C S, Mocanu G 2014 European Physical Journal C 74 2900Google Scholar

    [8]

    Charisi M, Bartos I, Haiman Z, Price-Whelan A M, Márka S 2015 Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 45 4

    [9]

    D'Orazio D J, Haiman Z, Schiminovich D 2015 Nature 525 351Google Scholar

    [10]

    Bhatta G, Zola S, Stawarz Ł, Ostrowski M, Winiarski M, Ogłoza W, Dróżdż M, Siwak M, Liakos A, et al 2016 Astrophys. J. 832 47Google Scholar

    [11]

    Carrasco L, Dultzinhacyan D, Cruzgonzalez I 1985 Nature 314 146Google Scholar

    [12]

    Kidger M, Takalo L, Sillanpää A 1992 Astron. Asrtophys. 264 32

    [13]

    Valtonen M J, Lehto H J, Sillanpää A, Nilsson K, Mikkola S, Hudec R, Basta M, Teräsranta H, Haque S, Rampadarath H 2006 Astrophys. J. 646 34

    [14]

    Misra R, Harikrishnan K P, Ambika G, Kembhavia A K 2006 Advances in Space Research 643 1114

    [15]

    Harikrishnan K P, Misra R, Ambika G 2011 Research in Astron. Astrophys. 11 71Google Scholar

    [16]

    Emmanoulopoulos D 2007 Ph. D. Dissertation (Heidelber: Ruperto-Carola University of Heidelberg)

    [17]

    唐洁 2014 物理学报 63 049701Google Scholar

    Tang J 2014 Acta. Phys. Sin. 63 049701Google Scholar

    [18]

    郝柏林 2001 物理 30 466Google Scholar

    Hao B L 2001 Physics 30 466Google Scholar

    [19]

    Pincus S M, Huang W M 1992 Commun. Statist-Theory Meth. 21 3061Google Scholar

    [20]

    金宁德, 董芳, 赵舒 2007 物理学报 56 0720

    Jin N D, Dong F, Zhao S 2007 Acta. Phys. Sin. 56 0720

    [21]

    Lempel A, Ziv J 1976 IEEE Trans. on Inf. Theory 22 75Google Scholar

    [22]

    郭家梁, 钟宁, 马小萌, 张明辉, 周海燕 2016 物理学报 65 190501Google Scholar

    Guo J L, Zhong N, Ma X M, Zhang M H, Zhou H Y 2016 Acta. Phys. Sin. 65 190501Google Scholar

    [23]

    Pettitt A N, Stephens M A 1977 Technometrics 19 205Google Scholar

    [24]

    Hughes P A, Aller H D, Aller M F 1992 Astrophys. J. 396 469Google Scholar

    [25]

    Scargle J D 1982 Astrophys. J. 263 835Google Scholar

    [26]

    唐洁, 刘晓琴, 傅明星 2018 陕西理工大学学报(自然科学版) 33 87Google Scholar

    Tang J, Liu X Q, Fu M X 2018 Journal of Shaanxi University of Technology (Natural Science Edition) 33 87Google Scholar

  • 图 1  典型时间序列

    Fig. 1.  Typical time series

    图 2  典型时间序列的近似熵

    Fig. 2.  The approximate entropy of typical time series

    图 3  SDSS J012228.72-001332.0的光变曲线

    Fig. 3.  Light curve of SDSS J012228.72-001332.0

    图 4  SDSS J012228.72-001332.0的近似熵

    Fig. 4.  The approximate entropy of SDSS J012228.72-001332.0

    图 5  SDSS类星体的近似熵分布

    Fig. 5.  Approximate entropy distribution of SDSS quasars

    表 1  SDSS类星体的近似熵

    Table 1.  Approximate entropy of SDSS quasars

    近似熵值 0—0.1 0.1—0.2 0.2—0.3 0.3—0.4 0.4—0.5 0.5—0.6
    波段 总样本数 样本数 百分数/% 样本数 百分数/% 样本数 百分数/% 样本数 百分数/% 样本数 百分数/% 样本数 百分数/%
    i 6465 39 0.60 365 5.65 1848 28.58 3106 48.04 1077 16.66 30 0.47
    r 6547 40 0. 61 438 6.69 1898 28.99 3131 47.82 1003 15.32 37 0.57
    g 6439 34 0.53 374 5.81 1794 27.86 3153 48.97 1033 16.04 51 0.79
    z 6373 40 0.63 203 3.19 1438 22.56 3223 50.57 1400 21.97 69 1.08
    u 6092 27 0.44 190 3.12 1503 24.67 3117 51.17 1214 19.93 41 0.67
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Fan J H, Zhang Y W, Qian B C, Tao J, Liu Y, Hua T X 2009 Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 181 466Google Scholar

    [2]

    黄克谅 2005 类星体与活动星系核 (北京: 科学出版社) 第3页

    Huang K L 2005 Quasars and Active Galactic Nucleus (Beijing: Science Press) p3 (in Chinese)

    [3]

    Kawaguchi T, Mineshige S, Umemura M 2002 Astrophys. J. 504 671

    [4]

    MacLeod C L, ŽIvezić C S, Kochanek S, Kozłowski B, Kelly E, Bullock A, Kimball B, Sesar D, Westman K B 2010 Astrophys. J. 721 1014Google Scholar

    [5]

    Kasliwal P V, Vogeley S M, Richards T G 2015 Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 451 4328Google Scholar

    [6]

    Guo H X, Wang J X, Cai Z Y, Sun M Y 2017 Astrophys. J. 847 132Google Scholar

    [7]

    Harko T, Leung C S, Mocanu G 2014 European Physical Journal C 74 2900Google Scholar

    [8]

    Charisi M, Bartos I, Haiman Z, Price-Whelan A M, Márka S 2015 Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 45 4

    [9]

    D'Orazio D J, Haiman Z, Schiminovich D 2015 Nature 525 351Google Scholar

    [10]

    Bhatta G, Zola S, Stawarz Ł, Ostrowski M, Winiarski M, Ogłoza W, Dróżdż M, Siwak M, Liakos A, et al 2016 Astrophys. J. 832 47Google Scholar

    [11]

    Carrasco L, Dultzinhacyan D, Cruzgonzalez I 1985 Nature 314 146Google Scholar

    [12]

    Kidger M, Takalo L, Sillanpää A 1992 Astron. Asrtophys. 264 32

    [13]

    Valtonen M J, Lehto H J, Sillanpää A, Nilsson K, Mikkola S, Hudec R, Basta M, Teräsranta H, Haque S, Rampadarath H 2006 Astrophys. J. 646 34

    [14]

    Misra R, Harikrishnan K P, Ambika G, Kembhavia A K 2006 Advances in Space Research 643 1114

    [15]

    Harikrishnan K P, Misra R, Ambika G 2011 Research in Astron. Astrophys. 11 71Google Scholar

    [16]

    Emmanoulopoulos D 2007 Ph. D. Dissertation (Heidelber: Ruperto-Carola University of Heidelberg)

    [17]

    唐洁 2014 物理学报 63 049701Google Scholar

    Tang J 2014 Acta. Phys. Sin. 63 049701Google Scholar

    [18]

    郝柏林 2001 物理 30 466Google Scholar

    Hao B L 2001 Physics 30 466Google Scholar

    [19]

    Pincus S M, Huang W M 1992 Commun. Statist-Theory Meth. 21 3061Google Scholar

    [20]

    金宁德, 董芳, 赵舒 2007 物理学报 56 0720

    Jin N D, Dong F, Zhao S 2007 Acta. Phys. Sin. 56 0720

    [21]

    Lempel A, Ziv J 1976 IEEE Trans. on Inf. Theory 22 75Google Scholar

    [22]

    郭家梁, 钟宁, 马小萌, 张明辉, 周海燕 2016 物理学报 65 190501Google Scholar

    Guo J L, Zhong N, Ma X M, Zhang M H, Zhou H Y 2016 Acta. Phys. Sin. 65 190501Google Scholar

    [23]

    Pettitt A N, Stephens M A 1977 Technometrics 19 205Google Scholar

    [24]

    Hughes P A, Aller H D, Aller M F 1992 Astrophys. J. 396 469Google Scholar

    [25]

    Scargle J D 1982 Astrophys. J. 263 835Google Scholar

    [26]

    唐洁, 刘晓琴, 傅明星 2018 陕西理工大学学报(自然科学版) 33 87Google Scholar

    Tang J, Liu X Q, Fu M X 2018 Journal of Shaanxi University of Technology (Natural Science Edition) 33 87Google Scholar

  • [1] 苟竞, 刘俊勇, 魏震波, Gareth Taylor, 刘友波. 基于多尺度熵的电力能量流复杂性分析. 物理学报, 2014, 63(20): 208402. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.208402
    [2] 周杰, 王亚林, 菊池久和. 多天线信道空间衰落相关性近似算法及其复杂性研究. 物理学报, 2014, 63(23): 230205. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.230205
    [3] 向郑涛, 陈宇峰, 李昱瑾, 熊励. 基于多尺度熵的交通流复杂性分析. 物理学报, 2014, 63(3): 038903. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.038903
    [4] 欧建文, 郑永刚, 张雄. 振荡吸积盘的光变研究. 物理学报, 2014, 63(23): 239801. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.239801
    [5] 唐洁. 基于集合经验模态分解的类星体光变周期及其混沌特性分析. 物理学报, 2014, 63(4): 049701. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.049701
    [6] 孙克辉, 贺少波, 何毅, 尹林子. 混沌伪随机序列的谱熵复杂性分析. 物理学报, 2013, 62(1): 010501. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.010501
    [7] 张学清, 梁军. 基于EEMD-近似熵和储备池的风电功率混沌时间序列预测模型. 物理学报, 2013, 62(5): 050505. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.050505
    [8] 唐洁, 傅明星, 吴学兵. 基于结构函数方法的类星体证认. 物理学报, 2012, 61(21): 219501. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.219501
    [9] 何文平, 何涛, 成海英, 张文, 吴琼. 基于近似熵的突变检测新方法. 物理学报, 2011, 60(4): 049202. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.049202
    [10] 张伟超, 杨立军, 吕小青. 基于近似熵测度的铝合金P-MIG焊亚射流过渡自适应控制研究. 物理学报, 2011, 60(2): 020601. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.020601
    [11] 董富通, 张雄. 类星体3C345的光变周期特性. 物理学报, 2009, 58(11): 8116-8122. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.8116
    [12] 何文平, 王启光, 吴琼, 张文, 张勇. 滑动去趋势波动分析与近似熵在动力学结构突变检测中的性能比较. 物理学报, 2009, 58(4): 2862-2871. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.2862
    [13] 周磊, 龚志强, 支蓉, 封国林. 基于复杂网络研究中国温度变化的区域特征. 物理学报, 2009, 58(10): 7351-7358. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.7351
    [14] 王启光, 张增平. 近似熵检测气候突变的研究. 物理学报, 2008, 57(3): 1976-1983. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.1976
    [15] 庄建军, 宁新宝, 邹 鸣, 孙 飙, 杨 希. 两种熵测度在量化射击运动员短时心率变异性信号复杂度上的一致性. 物理学报, 2008, 57(5): 2805-2811. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.2805
    [16] 李 强, 王太勇, 冷永刚, 何改云, 何慧龙. 基于近似熵测度的自适应随机共振研究. 物理学报, 2007, 56(12): 6803-6808. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.6803
    [17] 金宁德, 董 芳, 赵 舒. 气液两相流电导波动信号复杂性测度分析及其流型表征. 物理学报, 2007, 56(2): 720-729. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.720
    [18] 曹 彪, 吕小青, 曾 敏, 王振民, 黄石生. 短路过渡电弧焊电流信号的近似熵分析. 物理学报, 2006, 55(4): 1696-1705. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.1696
    [19] 谢勇, 徐健学, 杨红军, 胡三觉. 皮层脑电时间序列的相空间重构及非线性特征量的提取. 物理学报, 2002, 51(2): 205-214. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.205
    [20] 尤峻汉, 程富华. 佘楞科夫线状发射和类星体光谱. 物理学报, 1980, 29(7): 927-936. doi: 10.7498/aps.29.927
计量
  • 文章访问数:  7404
  • PDF下载量:  47
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2018-11-22
  • 修回日期:  2019-05-13
  • 刊出日期:  2019-07-20

/

返回文章
返回