搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于seasonal-trend-loess方法的符号化时间序列网络

汪丽娜 成媛媛 臧臣瑞

引用本文:
Citation:

基于seasonal-trend-loess方法的符号化时间序列网络

汪丽娜, 成媛媛, 臧臣瑞

A symbolized time series network based on seasonal-trend-loess method

Wang Li-Na, Cheng Yuan-Yuan, Zang Chen-Rui
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 为了有效控制海量数据时间序列网络的规模并使得网络更贴近实际, 符号化时间序列网络成为研究热点. 结合周期性时间序列的seasonal-trend-loess方法和符号化转化方法, 本文提出一种新的符号化时间序列建网方法. 该方法考虑了单个数据值的状态又结合了序列的长远变化趋势. 以符号模式为节点; 依时间顺序推移, 以节点间的邻接转换关系定义连边; 根据转换方向和转换频次确定连边的方向和权重, 建立有向加权网络. 分别以航空旅客吞吐量时间序列和因特网流量时间序列为实验数据构建的两个时间序列网络, 有明显差异的拓扑特征; 进一步对移动通信语音时间序列做了实证分析, 挖掘时间序列数据的本质规律.
    Modeling the time series complex network provides a new perspective for analyzing the time series. Some classical algorithms neglect the unidirectionality of the time and the difference in correlation between primitives. While the symbolized time series network can construct the network on a controlled scale and can construct the weighted directed network which is closer to reality. Combined with the seasonal-trend-loess method and the symbolized transformation of the periodic time series, a time series network construction method is proposed. Both the state of a single data value and the long-term trend of the time series are considered in our symbolized time series network. The symbolic modes are used as nodes, and the edges are defined according to the adjacent transformation relationship between nodes. The direction and the weight of the edges are determined according to the conversion direction and the conversion frequency. Then, the directed weighted network is established. The air passenger throughput time series and the Internet traffic time series are used as the experimental data respectively. The topological features of these two time series networks are obviously different. Furthermore, to mine the essential laws of time series data, the empirical analysis of the time series of mobile communication voices is carried out. Our work enriches the research results of time series networks.
      通信作者: 汪丽娜, wanglina@imut.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 内蒙古自治区自然科学基金(批准号: 2018LH01012)和国家自然科学基金(批准号: 71561020, 11861049)资助的课题
      Corresponding author: Wang Li-Na, wanglina@imut.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia, China (Grant No. 2018LH01012) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71561020, 11861049)
    [1]

    Zhang J, Small M 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 238701Google Scholar

    [2]

    Artameeyanant P, Sultornsanee S, Chamnongthai K 2017 Expert Syst. 34 e12211Google Scholar

    [3]

    Zhuang E, Small M, Feng G 2014 Physica A 410 483Google Scholar

    [4]

    Tang J J, Wang Y H, Wang H 2014 Physica A 405 303Google Scholar

    [5]

    Zhou C, Ding L Y, Skibniewski M J, Luo H B, Jiang S N 2017 Safety Sci. 98 145Google Scholar

    [6]

    Yue Y, Yang H 2008 Physica A 387 1381Google Scholar

    [7]

    Gao Z K, Jin N D 2009 Chaos 19 033137Google Scholar

    [8]

    Lacasa L, Luque B, Ballesteros F 2008 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105 4972Google Scholar

    [9]

    Lacasa L, Toral R 2010 Phys. Rev. E 82 036120Google Scholar

    [10]

    Marwan N, Donges J F, Zou Y 2009 Phys. Lett. A 373 4246Google Scholar

    [11]

    Karimi S, Darooneh A H 2013 Physica A 392 287Google Scholar

    [12]

    曾明, 王二红, 赵明愿 2017 物理学报 66 210502Google Scholar

    Zeng M, Wang E H, Zhao M Y 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 210502Google Scholar

    [13]

    Zhang Y L, Na S Y 2018 Sustainability 10 1073Google Scholar

    [14]

    Kennel M B, Isabelle S 1992 Phys. Rev. A 46 3111

    [15]

    Wang L L, Long X X, Arends J J 2017 J. Neurosci. Methods 290 85Google Scholar

    [16]

    Hloupis G 2017 Commun. Nonlinear SNI 51 13Google Scholar

    [17]

    Zhang B, Wang J, Fang W 2015 Physica A 432 301Google Scholar

    [18]

    Zou Y, Donner R V, Marwan N,Small M, Kurths 2014 Nonlinear Proc. Geoph. 21 1113

    [19]

    Luque B, Lacasa L, Ballesteros F 2009 Phys. Rev. E 80 046103Google Scholar

    [20]

    周婷婷, 金宁德, 高忠科 2012 物理学报 61 030506Google Scholar

    Zhou T T, Jin N D, Gao Z K 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 030506Google Scholar

    [21]

    高忠科, 胡沥丹, 周婷婷 2013 物理学报 62 110507Google Scholar

    Gao Z K, Hu L D, Zhou T T 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 110507Google Scholar

    [22]

    Gao Z K, Cai Q, Yang Y X 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 35622Google Scholar

    [23]

    Subramaniyam N P, Hyttinen J 2015 Phys. Rev. E 91 022927Google Scholar

    [24]

    Robert B C, William S C, Jean E M, Irma T 1990 J. Offical Statistics 6 3

    [25]

    Paulo C, Miguel R, Miguel R, Pedro S 2012 Expert Syst. 29 143

    [26]

    Xu B, Chen D, Zhang H, Zhou R 2015 Nonlinear Dynam. 81 1263Google Scholar

    [27]

    Xu B, Chen D, Behrens P, Ye Wei, Guo P, Luo X 2018 Energ Convers. Manage. 174 208Google Scholar

  • 图 1  (a)−(d)航空旅客吞吐量时间序列的STL分析 (a)原始时间序列; (b)季节项时间序列; (c) 趋势项时间序列; (d) 随机项时间序列; (e)航空旅客吞吐量时间序列网络

    Fig. 1.  (a)−(d) The STL analyzing for the air passengers throughput time series: (a) Original time series; (b) seasonal time series; (c) trend time series; (d) remainder time series; (e) the time series network of the air passengers throughput data.

    图 2  航空旅客吞吐量时间序列网络度分布 (a)累积加权入度分布; (b)累积加权出度分布; (c)累积加权度分布

    Fig. 2.  The degree distribution of the time series network for air passengers throughput data: (a) The cumulative weighted in-degree distribution; (b) the cumulative weighted out-degree distribution; (c) the cumulative weighted degree distribution.

    图 3  (a)−(d)因特网流量时间序列的STL分析 (a)原始时间序列; (b)季节项时间序列; (c) 趋势项时间序列; (d) 随机项时间序列; (e)因特网流量时间序列网络

    Fig. 3.  (a)−(d) The STL decomposition results of the Internet traffic time series: (a) Original time series; (b) seasonal time series; (c) trend time series; (d) remainder time series; (e) the time series network of the Internet traffic data.

    图 4  因特网流量时间序列网络的度分布 (a)累积加权入度分布; (b)累积加权出度分布; (c)累积加权度分布

    Fig. 4.  The degree distribution of the time series network for the Internet traffic data: (a) The cumulative weighted in-degree distribution; (b) the cumulative weighted out-degree distribution; (c) the cumulative weighted degree distribution.

    图 5  (a)−(d)语音时间序列数据的STL分析 (a)原始时间序列; (b)季节项时间序列; (c) 趋势项时间序列; (d) 随机项时间序列; (e)基于STL方法的语音时间序列网络

    Fig. 5.  (a)−(d) The STL analyzing for the mobile traffic data: (a) Original time series; (b) seasonal time series; (c) trend time series; (d) remainder time series; (e) based on the STL decomposition, the time series network of the mobile traffic data.

    图 6  语音时间序列网络的度分布 (a)累积加权入度分布; (b)累积加权出度分布; (c)累积加权度分布

    Fig. 6.  The degree distribution of the time series network for the mobile traffic data: (a) The cumulative weighted in-degree distribution; (b) the cumulative weighted out-degree distribution; (c) the cumulative weighted degree distribution.

    表 1  两类时间序列网络拓扑特征的比较

    Table 1.  The comparison for topological characteristics of two kinds time series networks.

    时间序列网络拓扑特征
    长度周期节点数平均加权度聚类系数平均路径长度加权度分布
    航空旅客吞吐量264121074.4300.16913.355指数分布
    因特网流量31682881605.5380.24925.610幂律分布
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  网络节点模式特征表

    Table 2.  The table for characteristics of node patterns.

    节点聚类系数节点加权出度节点介数
    dcb1faa3874eoa9810.72
    daa1aaa3780hia9605.21
    aac1haa2597faa9295.21
    deb1eaa2570eaa8532.04
    dfb1gaa2564haa6180.21
    dgb1daa1279aba4185.66
    egc1aba890ana3933.32
    aqb1fba765aoa3649.48
    aob1eba564fra3475.81
    dkb1hba550aga3389.27
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Zhang J, Small M 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 238701Google Scholar

    [2]

    Artameeyanant P, Sultornsanee S, Chamnongthai K 2017 Expert Syst. 34 e12211Google Scholar

    [3]

    Zhuang E, Small M, Feng G 2014 Physica A 410 483Google Scholar

    [4]

    Tang J J, Wang Y H, Wang H 2014 Physica A 405 303Google Scholar

    [5]

    Zhou C, Ding L Y, Skibniewski M J, Luo H B, Jiang S N 2017 Safety Sci. 98 145Google Scholar

    [6]

    Yue Y, Yang H 2008 Physica A 387 1381Google Scholar

    [7]

    Gao Z K, Jin N D 2009 Chaos 19 033137Google Scholar

    [8]

    Lacasa L, Luque B, Ballesteros F 2008 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105 4972Google Scholar

    [9]

    Lacasa L, Toral R 2010 Phys. Rev. E 82 036120Google Scholar

    [10]

    Marwan N, Donges J F, Zou Y 2009 Phys. Lett. A 373 4246Google Scholar

    [11]

    Karimi S, Darooneh A H 2013 Physica A 392 287Google Scholar

    [12]

    曾明, 王二红, 赵明愿 2017 物理学报 66 210502Google Scholar

    Zeng M, Wang E H, Zhao M Y 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 210502Google Scholar

    [13]

    Zhang Y L, Na S Y 2018 Sustainability 10 1073Google Scholar

    [14]

    Kennel M B, Isabelle S 1992 Phys. Rev. A 46 3111

    [15]

    Wang L L, Long X X, Arends J J 2017 J. Neurosci. Methods 290 85Google Scholar

    [16]

    Hloupis G 2017 Commun. Nonlinear SNI 51 13Google Scholar

    [17]

    Zhang B, Wang J, Fang W 2015 Physica A 432 301Google Scholar

    [18]

    Zou Y, Donner R V, Marwan N,Small M, Kurths 2014 Nonlinear Proc. Geoph. 21 1113

    [19]

    Luque B, Lacasa L, Ballesteros F 2009 Phys. Rev. E 80 046103Google Scholar

    [20]

    周婷婷, 金宁德, 高忠科 2012 物理学报 61 030506Google Scholar

    Zhou T T, Jin N D, Gao Z K 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 030506Google Scholar

    [21]

    高忠科, 胡沥丹, 周婷婷 2013 物理学报 62 110507Google Scholar

    Gao Z K, Hu L D, Zhou T T 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 110507Google Scholar

    [22]

    Gao Z K, Cai Q, Yang Y X 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 35622Google Scholar

    [23]

    Subramaniyam N P, Hyttinen J 2015 Phys. Rev. E 91 022927Google Scholar

    [24]

    Robert B C, William S C, Jean E M, Irma T 1990 J. Offical Statistics 6 3

    [25]

    Paulo C, Miguel R, Miguel R, Pedro S 2012 Expert Syst. 29 143

    [26]

    Xu B, Chen D, Zhang H, Zhou R 2015 Nonlinear Dynam. 81 1263Google Scholar

    [27]

    Xu B, Chen D, Behrens P, Ye Wei, Guo P, Luo X 2018 Energ Convers. Manage. 174 208Google Scholar

  • [1] 汪亭亭, 梁宗文, 张若曦. 基于信息熵与迭代因子的复杂网络节点重要性评价方法. 物理学报, 2023, 72(4): 048901. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221878
    [2] 阮逸润, 老松杨, 汤俊, 白亮, 郭延明. 基于引力方法的复杂网络节点重要度评估方法. 物理学报, 2022, 71(17): 176401. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220565
    [3] 马金龙, 张俊峰, 张冬雯, 张红斌. 基于通信序列熵的复杂网络传输容量. 物理学报, 2021, 70(7): 078902. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201300
    [4] 谭索怡, 祁明泽, 吴俊, 吕欣. 复杂网络链路可预测性: 基于特征谱视角. 物理学报, 2020, 69(8): 088901. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191817
    [5] 陈单, 石丹丹, 潘贵军. 复杂网络电输运性能与通信序列熵之间的关联. 物理学报, 2019, 68(11): 118901. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190230
    [6] 杨青林, 王立夫, 李欢, 余牧舟. 基于相对距离的复杂网络谱粗粒化方法. 物理学报, 2019, 68(10): 100501. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181848
    [7] 周建, 贾贞, 李科赞. 复杂网络谱粗粒化方法的改进算法. 物理学报, 2017, 66(6): 060502. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.060502
    [8] 武喜萍, 杨红雨, 韩松臣. 基于复杂网络理论的多元混合空管技术保障系统网络特征分析. 物理学报, 2016, 65(14): 140203. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.140203
    [9] 胡庆成, 张勇, 许信辉, 邢春晓, 陈池, 陈信欢. 一种新的复杂网络影响力最大化发现方法. 物理学报, 2015, 64(19): 190101. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.190101
    [10] 李华姣, 安海忠, 黄家宸, 高湘昀, 石艳丽. 基于节点拓扑特征的中国基金公司共持网络持股行为波动相关性. 物理学报, 2014, 63(4): 048901. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.048901
    [11] 于会, 刘尊, 李勇军. 基于多属性决策的复杂网络节点重要性综合评价方法. 物理学报, 2013, 62(2): 020204. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.020204
    [12] 周漩, 杨帆, 张凤鸣, 周卫平, 邹伟. 复杂网络系统拓扑连接优化控制方法. 物理学报, 2013, 62(15): 150201. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.150201
    [13] 梁义, 王兴元. 基于低阶矩阵最大特征值的复杂网络牵制混沌同步. 物理学报, 2012, 61(3): 038901. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.038901
    [14] 郑啸, 陈建平, 邵佳丽, 别立东. 基于复杂网络理论的北京公交网络拓扑性质分析. 物理学报, 2012, 61(19): 190510. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.190510
    [15] 龚志强, 支蓉, 侯威, 王晓娟, 封国林. 基于复杂网络的北半球遥相关年代际变化特征研究. 物理学报, 2012, 61(2): 029202. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.029202
    [16] 高湘昀, 安海忠, 方伟. 基于复杂网络的时间序列双变量相关性波动研究. 物理学报, 2012, 61(9): 098902. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.098902
    [17] 高忠科, 金宁德, 杨丹, 翟路生, 杜萌. 多元时间序列复杂网络流型动力学分析. 物理学报, 2012, 61(12): 120510. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.120510
    [18] 郝崇清, 王江, 邓斌, 魏熙乐. 基于稀疏贝叶斯学习的复杂网络拓扑估计. 物理学报, 2012, 61(14): 148901. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.148901
    [19] 曾长燕, 孙梅, 田立新. 基于自适应-脉冲控制方法实现时变耦合驱动-响应复杂网络的投影同步. 物理学报, 2010, 59(8): 5288-5292. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.5288
    [20] 陈卫东, 徐华, 郭琦. 国际石油价格复杂网络的动力学拓扑性质. 物理学报, 2010, 59(7): 4514-4523. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.4514
计量
  • 文章访问数:  7057
  • PDF下载量:  70
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-05-24
  • 修回日期:  2019-09-04
  • 上网日期:  2019-11-27
  • 刊出日期:  2019-12-05

/

返回文章
返回