-
固态锂离子电池因具有高安全、高能量密度等多种优势而备受关注, 但目前固态锂离子电池尚未大规模商业化, 主要原因是固态锂离子电池中存在的关键科学问题和技术问题尚未解决, 特别是界面问题, 例如界面的高电阻与不稳定性. X射线光电子能谱(X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, XPS)作为重要的表面分析手段, 可以定性和半定量地进行界面的化学分析, 这使得XPS可以广泛应用于固态锂离子电池界面的研究. 本文综述了近年来利用XPS进行固态锂离子电池界面的研究进展, 并对XPS实验原理、实验方法、实验结果及其对界面性能的影响进行了总结与评述. XPS研究固态锂离子电池界面的方法主要为非原位XPS、反映电池界面实时变化的原位XPS、以及基于电池真实工作条件的operando XPS, 所获取信息包括界面反应发生后元素的化学状态、实时界面反应过程中界面元素的变化情况、由元素结合能位移反映的能带结构变化和界面组分的过电位等信息, 从而加深对固态锂离子电池界面成分、结构变化和界面反应动力学及界面离子迁移等方面的认识.
-
关键词:
- 固态锂离子电池 /
- X射线光电子能谱(XPS) /
- 固体电解质界面
Solid-state lithium-ion batteries have attracted much attention due to their high safety, high energy densities and other advantages. However, solid-state lithium-ion batteries cannot realize large-scale commercial use. There are key scientific and technical issues that have not been resolved, especially interface issues, such as high resistance and instability of the interface. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), as an important surface analysis method, can perform qualitative and semi-quantitative chemical analysis of the interface, which makes XPS can be widely used to study the solid-state lithium-ion battery interfaces. In this paper, we review the recent research progress of solid-state lithium-ion battery interfaces by using XPS, and summarize and review the XPS experimental principle, experimental method, experimental results and their effects on interface performance. The XPS analysis methods for solid-state lithium-ion batteries include ex-situ XPS, in-situ XPS reflecting the real-time changes of the battery interface, and operando XPS based on the actual working conditions of the battery. The ex-situ XPS can study oxide solid electrolyte interfaces, sulfide solid electrolyte interfaces and artificial solid electrolyte interface (SEI) layers to access information about the chemical composition of the interface, predict the performance of the interface, obtain the chemical distribution in space, and evaluate the chemical structure and irregularity of the interface. With ultraviolet photoemission spectroscopy (UPS) the interface work function, energy band bending and energy structure of the full battery can be obtained. In-situ XPS can effectively study the process of chemical reactions between the electrolyte and the electrode. The key prerequisite is the controllable in-situ construction of the electrolyte/electrode interface. In-situ XPS research can directly study the electrochemical changes of the interface. In-situ XPS/UPS can study the energy level alignment of solid-state lithium-ion batteries, indicating that a space charge layer is formed at the solid electrolyte interface, and the energy band bending occurs. The degree of energy band bending is reflected in the binding energy shifts of the related elements at the interface. The change of the energy structure in the deposition process can be determined by the binding energy shifts of the related elements at the interface and the change of the interface work function. Operando XPS performs XPS characterization at the same time under the working condition of the battery. Operando XPS can be combined with electrochemical characterization to observe the effects of interface reaction and solid electrolyte decomposition products on electrochemical performance, thereby determining the main components that affect electrochemical performance. It can also be combined with the ex-situ XPS to study the interface reaction mechanism and influencing factors. The information obtained includes the chemical states of elements after the interface reaction has occurred, the evolution of interface elements in the process of real-time interface reaction, the energy structure change and interface component overpotential, thus having a better understanding of interface composition, interfacial structure change, kinetics of interface reaction, and interfacial ion migration of the solid-state lithium ion batteries. -
Keywords:
- solid-state lithium-ion battery (SSLIB) /
- X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) /
- solid electrolyte interface
[1] Scrosati B, Garche J 2010 J. Power Sources 195 2419
Google Scholar
[2] Wen J, Yu Y, Chen C 2012 Mater. Express 2 197
Google Scholar
[3] Xiang Y, Li X, Cheng Y, Sun X, Yang Y 2020 Mater. Today 36 139
Google Scholar
[4] Wang H, Liu Y, Li Y, Cui Y 2019 Electrochem. Energy Rev. 2 509
Google Scholar
[5] Kim J G, Son B, Mukherjee S, Schuppert N, Bates A, Kwon O, Choi M J, Chung H Y, Park S 2015 J. Power Sources 282 299
Google Scholar
[6] Wang P, Qu W, Song W L, Chen H, Chen R, Fang D 2019 Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 1900950
[7] Shen Z, Zhang W, Zhu G, Huang Y, Feng Q, Lu Y 2020 Small Methods 4 1900592
Google Scholar
[8] Xu L, Tang S, Cheng Y, Wang K, Liang J, Liu C, Cao Y, Wei F, Mai L 2018 Joule 2 1991
Google Scholar
[9] Colclasure A M, Smith K A, Kee R J 2011 Electrochim. Acta 58 33
Google Scholar
[10] Chen W, Ou Z, Tang H, Wang H, Yang Y 2008 Electrochim. Acta 53 4414
Google Scholar
[11] Wang A, Kadam S, Li H, Shi S, Qi Y 2018 NPJ Comput. Mater. 4 15
Google Scholar
[12] Schwöbel A, Jaegermann W, Hausbrand R 2016 Solid State Ionics 288 224
Google Scholar
[13] Brundle C R 1974 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 11 212
Google Scholar
[14] Watts J F, Wolstenholme J 2003 An Introduction to Surface Analysis by XPS and AES (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons) pp1–14
[15] Watts J F, Wolstenholme J 2003 An Introduction to Surface Analysis by XPS and AES (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons) pp59–76
[16] Meunier G, Dormoy R, Levasseur A 1989 Mater. Sci. Eng., B 3 19
Google Scholar
[17] Ueda S 2013 J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 190 235
Google Scholar
[18] Zhao W, Yi J, He P, Zhou H 2019 Electrochem. Energy Rev. 2 574
Google Scholar
[19] Reddy M V, Julien C M, Mauger A, Zaghib K 2020 Nanomaterials 10 1606
Google Scholar
[20] Manthiram A, Yu X, Wang S 2017 Nat. Rev. Mater. 2 16103
Google Scholar
[21] Murugan R, Thangadurai V, Weppner W 2007 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46 7778
Google Scholar
[22] Sudo R, Nakata Y, Ishiguro K, Matsui M, Hirano A, Takeda Y, Yamamoto O, Imanishi N 2014 Solid State Ionics 262 151
Google Scholar
[23] Luo W, Gong Y, Zhu Y, Fu K K, Dai J, Lacey S D, Wang C, Liu B, Han X, Mo Y, Wachsman E D, Hu L 2016 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 12258
Google Scholar
[24] Meng J, Zhang Y, Zhou X, Lei M, Li C 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 3716
Google Scholar
[25] Sharafi A, Yu S, Naguib M, Lee M, Ma C, Meyer H M, Nanda J, Chi M, Siegel D J, Sakamoto J 2017 J. Mater. Chem. A 5 13475
Google Scholar
[26] Wu J F, Pu B W, Wang D, Shi S Q, Zhao N, Guo X, Guo X 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 898
Google Scholar
[27] Samson A J, Hofstetter K, Bag S, Thangadurai V 2019 Energy Environ. Sci. 12 2957
Google Scholar
[28] Li Y, Wang Z, Cao Y, Du F, Chen C, Cui Z, Guo X 2015 Electrochim. Acta 180 37
Google Scholar
[29] Ohta S, Kobayashi T, Asaoka T 2011 J. Power Sources 196 3342
Google Scholar
[30] Zhu Y, He X, Mo Y 2016 J. Mater. Chem. A 4 3253
Google Scholar
[31] Han F, Zhu Y, He X, Mo Y, Wang C 2016 Adv. Energy Mater. 6 1501590
Google Scholar
[32] Wolfenstine J, Allen J L, Read J, Sakamoto J 2013 J. Mater. Sci. 48 5846
Google Scholar
[33] Tan D H S, Banerjee A, Chen Z, Meng Y S 2020 Nat. Nanotechnol. 15 170
Google Scholar
[34] Connell J G, Zhu Y, Zapol P, Tepavcevic S, Sharafi A, Sakamoto J, Curtiss L A, Fong D D, Freeland J W, Markovic N M 2018 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 17471
Google Scholar
[35] Zhu J, Zhao J, Xiang Y, Lin M, Wang H, Zheng B, He H, Wu Q, Huang J Y, Yang Y 2020 Chem. Mater. 32 4998
Google Scholar
[36] Sharafi A, Meyer H M, Nanda J, Wolfenstine J, Sakamoto J 2016 J. Power Sources 302 135
Google Scholar
[37] Yu S, Siegel D J 2017 Chem. Mater. 29 9639
Google Scholar
[38] Pesci F M, Brugge R H, Hekselman A K O, Cavallaro A, Chater R J, Aguadero A 2018 J. Mater. Chem. A 6 19817
Google Scholar
[39] Han F, Westover A S, Yue J, Fan X, Wang F, Chi M, Leonard D N, Dudney N J, Wang H, Wang C 2019 Nat. Energy 4 187
Google Scholar
[40] Haruyama J, Sodeyama K, Tateyama Y 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 286
Google Scholar
[41] Zarabian M, Bartolini M, Pereira-Almao P, Thangadurai V 2017 J. Electrochem. Soc. 164 A1133
Google Scholar
[42] Liu Y, Sun Q, Liu J, Norouzi Banis M, Zhao Y, Wang B, Adair K, Hu Y, Xiao Q, Zhang C, Zhang L, Lu S, Huang H, Song X, Sun X 2020 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 2293
Google Scholar
[43] Trevey J E, Jung Y S, Lee S H 2011 Electrochim. Acta 56 4243
Google Scholar
[44] Mizuno F, Hayashi A, Tadanaga K, Tatsumisago M 2005 Adv. Mater. 17 918
Google Scholar
[45] Kanno R, Murayama M 2001 J. Electrochem. Soc. 148 A742
Google Scholar
[46] Kanno R, Hata T, Kawamoto Y, Irie M 2000 Solid State Ionics 130 97
Google Scholar
[47] Kamaya N, Homma K, Yamakawa Y, Hirayama M, Kanno R, Yonemura M, Kamiyama T, Kato Y, Hama S, Kawamoto K, Mitsui A 2011 Nat. Mater. 10 682
Google Scholar
[48] Kudu Ö U, Famprikis T, Fleutot B, Braida M-D, Le Mercier T, Islam M S, Masquelier C 2018 J. Power Sources 407 31
Google Scholar
[49] Mizuno F, Hayashi A, Tadanaga K, Tatsumisago M 2006 Solid State Ionics 177 2721
Google Scholar
[50] Liu Z, Fu W, Payzant E A, Yu X, Wu Z, Dudney N J, Kiggans J, Hong K, Rondinone A J, Liang C 2013 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 975
Google Scholar
[51] Dietrich C, Weber D A, Culver S, Senyshyn A, Sedlmaier S J, Indris S, Janek J, Zeier W G 2017 Inorg. Chem. 56 6681
Google Scholar
[52] Seino Y, Ota T, Takada K, Hayashi A, Tatsumisago M 2014 Energy Environ. Sci. 7 627
Google Scholar
[53] Wenzel S, Randau S, Leichtweiß T, Weber D A, Sann J, Zeier W G, Janek J 2016 Chem. Mater. 28 2400
Google Scholar
[54] Zhou P, Wang J, Cheng F, Li F, Chen J 2016 Chem. Commun. 52 6091
Google Scholar
[55] Boulineau S, Courty M, Tarascon J M, Viallet V 2012 Solid State Ionics 221 1
Google Scholar
[56] Zhu Y, He X, Mo Y 2015 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7 23685
Google Scholar
[57] Auvergniot J, Cassel A, Foix D, Viallet V, Seznec V, Dedryvère R 2017 Solid State Ionics 300 78
Google Scholar
[58] Gao Y, Wang D, Li Y C, Yu Z, Mallouk T E, Wang D 2018 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 13608
Google Scholar
[59] Koerver R, Walther F, Aygün I, Sann J, Dietrich C, Zeier W G, Janek J 2017 J. Mater. Chem. A 5 22750
Google Scholar
[60] Du M, Liao K, Lu Q, Shao Z 2019 Energy Environ. Sci. 12 1780
Google Scholar
[61] Ni X, Qian T, Liu X, Xu N, Liu J, Yan C 2018 Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 1706513
Google Scholar
[62] Zhang L, Zhang K, Shi Z, Zhang S 2017 Langmuir 33 11164
Google Scholar
[63] Shi X, Pang Y, Wang B, Sun H, Wang X, Li Y, Yang J, Li H W, Zheng S 2020 Mater. Today Nano 10 100079
Google Scholar
[64] Fan X, Ji X, Han F, Yue J, Chen J, Chen L, Deng T, Jiang J, Wang C 2018 Sci. Adv. 4 eaau9245
Google Scholar
[65] Chang X, Liu H, Yang H, Di J, Tang W, Fu H, Li M, Liu R 2020 J. Materiomics 6 54
Google Scholar
[66] Nagao K, Suyama M, Kato A, Hotehama C, Deguchi M, Sakuda A, Hayashi A, Tatsumisago M 2019 ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2 3042
Google Scholar
[67] Liang J Y, Zhang X D, Zeng X X, Yan M, Yin Y X, Xin S, Wang W P, Wu X W, Shi J L, Wan L J, Guo Y G 2020 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 6585
Google Scholar
[68] Tripathi A M, Su W N, Hwang B J 2018 Chem. Soc. Rev. 47 736
Google Scholar
[69] Sicolo S, Fingerle M, Hausbrand R, Albe K 2017 J. Power Sources 354 124
Google Scholar
[70] Wenzel S, Leichtweiss T, Krüger D, Sann J, Janek J 2015 Solid State Ionics. 278 98
Google Scholar
[71] Liu Z, Li G, A. Borodin, Liu X, Li Y, Endres F 2019 J. Solid State Electrochem. 23 2107
Google Scholar
[72] Jones S D, Akridge J R, Shokoohi F K 1994 Solid State Ionics 69 357
Google Scholar
[73] Lacivita V, Artrith N, Ceder G 2018 Chem. Mater. 30 7077
Google Scholar
[74] Lacivita V, Westover A S, Kercher A, Phillip N D, Yang G, Veith G, Ceder G, Dudney N J 2018 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 11029
Google Scholar
[75] Yu X, Bates J B, Jellison G E, Hart F X 1997 J. Electrochem. Soc. 144 524
Google Scholar
[76] Schwöbel A, Hausbrand R, Jaegermann W 2015 Solid State Ionics 273 51
Google Scholar
[77] Nazri G 1988 MRS Proc. 135 117
[78] Nazri G 1989 Solid State Ionics 34 97
Google Scholar
[79] Maier J, Bunsenges B 1985 Phys. Chem. 89 355
[80] Guo X, Chen C 2016 Acta. Chim. Slov. 63 3
[81] Bañares M A 2005 Catal. Today 100 71
Google Scholar
[82] Palomares V, Sharma N 2019 Front. Energy Res. 7 10
Google Scholar
[83] Wu X, Villevieille C, Novák P, El Kazzi M 2018 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 11123
Google Scholar
[84] Nelson Weker J, Toney M F 2015 Adv. Funct. Mater. 25 1622
Google Scholar
[85] Wood K N, Steirer K X, Hafner S E, et al. 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 2490
Google Scholar
-
图 1 SSLIB中的界面、界面问题和解决策略示意图
Fig. 1. Illustration of the interfaces, interface issues, and solving strategies in SSLIB.
图 4 (a) 原始和放电后的Li7La3Zr2O12(LLZO)表面的Zr 3d分峰拟合结果[31]; (b)原始Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3(LATP)、化学失效LATP、电化学失效LATP的Ti 2p谱图[35]; LiCoO2衬底上LLZO薄膜不同刻蚀深度的(c)Co 2p峰以及(d)Li 1s和Co 3p峰的XPS深度剖析谱图[41]
Fig. 4. (a) Peak deconvolution of Zr 3d spectra of fresh and discharged Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZO)[31]; (b) Ti 2p XPS spectra of the Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 (LATP)-pristine, chem-LATP(chemical failure), and EC-LATP(electrochemical failure) surface[35]; XPS depth profiles of (c) Co 2p spectra, (d) Li 1s and Co 3p spectra of LLZO thin film on LiCoO2 at different depth[41].
图 6 (a) 循环后的Li/Li10GeP2S12界面的XPS深度剖析谱图, S 2p, Ge 3d, P 2p, Li 1s[58]; (b) 在不同截止电压(4.0—5.0 V)循环25次后的集流体/正极界面随时间变化的S 2p深度剖析谱图[59]
Fig. 6. (a) XPS depth profiles of cycled Li/Li10GeP2S12 interface: XPS spectra of S 2p, Ge 3d, P 2p, Li 1s[58]; (b) S 2p XPS depth profiles after 25 cycles for different upper cut-off voltage (4.0–5.0 V) as a function of different etching time[59].
图 7 (a) 循环后LiFSI修饰的Li3PS4的F 1s和P 2p(右)谱图, 循环后未处理的Li3PS4的P 2p(左)谱图[64]; (b) Li/Li2.9B0.9S0.1O3.1对称电池恒流充放电循环前后的阻抗图[66]; (c)刻蚀得到的Li/Li2.9B0.9S0.1O3.1区域表面/界面/体相的B 1s, S 2p, O 1s, Li 1s谱图[66]
Fig. 7. (a) F 1s and P 2p (right) spectra of LiFSI-treated Li3PS4 from cycled cell, P 2p (left) spectra of untreated Li3PS4 from cycled cell[64]; (b) impedance plots of the Li/ Li2.9B0.9S0.1O3.1 symmetric cell before and after the galvanostatic test for cycles[66]; (c) XPS spectra of B 1s, S 2p, O 1s, Li 1s for the outermost surface, interface, and electrolyte bulk regions uncovered by etching of Li/Li2.9B0.9S0.1O3.1 interface area[66].
图 9 (a) LLTO表面不同锂沉积时间的Ti 2p, La 3d, O 1s谱以及Ti 2p瀑布图[70]; (b) 31 nm金属锂沉积过程中Li10GeP2S12表面的S 2p, Ge 3d和P 2p-Ge 3p谱图[53]; (c) Li2.94PO3.5N0.31的结构和磷酸盐结构中N的结合情况示意图[73,74]; (d)金属锂沉积过程中LiPON表面的O 1s, N 1s, P 2p, Li 1s和价带图[76]
Fig. 9. (a) Ti 2p, La 3d, O 1s detail spectra and Ti 2p waterfall plot for different Li metal deposition times on LLTO surface[70]; (b) S 2p, Ge 3d, and P 2p-Ge 3p detail spectra during 31 nm Li metal deposition on Li10GeP2S12 surface[53]; (c) scheme of Li2.94PO3.5N0.31 structure and possible N configurations in phosphate structures[73,74]; (d) O 1s, N 1s, P 2p, Li 1s, and valence band spectra of LiPON surface during Li metal deposition[76].
图 10 (a)电化学电池的负极界面原位XPS测试示意图; (b)不同电势下Li/Ga-LLZO界面的O 1s, Li 1s, La 4d, Zr 3d谱图[71]; (c)原位XPS装置示意图; (d)电化学极化中混合正极的S 2p谱图[59]
Fig. 10. (a) Scheme of the configuration of the anode surface of electrochemical cell for in situ XPS; (b) in situ XPS spectra of O 1s, Li 1s, La 4d, and Zr 3d at the Li/Ga-doped LLZO interphase as a function of potential[71]; (c) scheme of the measurement setup for in situ XPS; (d) S 2p spectra of composite cathode during electrochemical polarization[59].
图 11 (a) LiPON沉积过程中LiCoO2表面的Co 2p, O 1s, P 2p和价带谱图; (b) LiCoO2内层电子结合能, LiPON P 2p电子结合能和表面功函数在沉积过程中的变化; (c)金属锂沉积过程中LiPON内层电子结合能的变化; (d)Li/LiPON/LiCoO2 SSLIB的能带图[12]
Fig. 11. (a) Co 2p, O 1s, P 2p and valence band spectra of LiCoO2 surface during the deposition of LiPON; (b) evolution of the core level binding energies of the LiCoO2 substrate and the P 2p binding energy of the covering LiPON layer as a function of deposition time; (c) evolution of the binding energies during the stepwise evaporation of lithium on top of LiPON; (d) energy band diagram of Li/LiPON/LiCoO2 SSLIB[12].
图 12 (a)全固态operando XPS电池的结构示意图[83]; (b) Operando XPS电池和标准电池工作电极的循环伏安测试结果[83]; (c) S 2p, P 2p, Co 3p-Li 1s-Fe 3p谱图在operando XPS测试过程中的变化[83]
Fig. 12. (a) An operando XPS cell design for all-solid-state batteries[83]; (b) cyclic voltammetry measurements of the work electrodes of the operando XPS cell and a standard test cell[83]; (c) evolution of S 2p, P 2p, and Co 3p-Li 1s-Fe 3p core level spectra recorded during the operando XPS measurements[83].
图 13 (a)虚拟电极法实现operando XPS测试的原理图和原始、充电、放电状态下Li2S-P2S5表面的Li 1s谱图变化[85]; (b)各XPS谱图及拟合结果在operando XPS过程中的变化[85]
Fig. 13. (a) Schematic of operando XPS measurements via virtual electrode cycling and the evolution of Li 1s spectra on Li2S-P2S5 surface during the cycling process[85]; (b) evolution of XPS spectra showing peak deconvolution during operando XPS measurements[85].
图 14 (a) SEI各组分充电过程中结合能的位移[85]; (b) SEI各组分的过电位及得到的SEI结构示意图[85]
Fig. 14. (a) Binding energy shifts of each SEI phase composition during charging process[85]; (b) overpotential of each SEI phase composition during charging process and scheme of SEI structure after charging based on the overpotential[85].
-
[1] Scrosati B, Garche J 2010 J. Power Sources 195 2419
Google Scholar
[2] Wen J, Yu Y, Chen C 2012 Mater. Express 2 197
Google Scholar
[3] Xiang Y, Li X, Cheng Y, Sun X, Yang Y 2020 Mater. Today 36 139
Google Scholar
[4] Wang H, Liu Y, Li Y, Cui Y 2019 Electrochem. Energy Rev. 2 509
Google Scholar
[5] Kim J G, Son B, Mukherjee S, Schuppert N, Bates A, Kwon O, Choi M J, Chung H Y, Park S 2015 J. Power Sources 282 299
Google Scholar
[6] Wang P, Qu W, Song W L, Chen H, Chen R, Fang D 2019 Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 1900950
[7] Shen Z, Zhang W, Zhu G, Huang Y, Feng Q, Lu Y 2020 Small Methods 4 1900592
Google Scholar
[8] Xu L, Tang S, Cheng Y, Wang K, Liang J, Liu C, Cao Y, Wei F, Mai L 2018 Joule 2 1991
Google Scholar
[9] Colclasure A M, Smith K A, Kee R J 2011 Electrochim. Acta 58 33
Google Scholar
[10] Chen W, Ou Z, Tang H, Wang H, Yang Y 2008 Electrochim. Acta 53 4414
Google Scholar
[11] Wang A, Kadam S, Li H, Shi S, Qi Y 2018 NPJ Comput. Mater. 4 15
Google Scholar
[12] Schwöbel A, Jaegermann W, Hausbrand R 2016 Solid State Ionics 288 224
Google Scholar
[13] Brundle C R 1974 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 11 212
Google Scholar
[14] Watts J F, Wolstenholme J 2003 An Introduction to Surface Analysis by XPS and AES (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons) pp1–14
[15] Watts J F, Wolstenholme J 2003 An Introduction to Surface Analysis by XPS and AES (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons) pp59–76
[16] Meunier G, Dormoy R, Levasseur A 1989 Mater. Sci. Eng., B 3 19
Google Scholar
[17] Ueda S 2013 J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 190 235
Google Scholar
[18] Zhao W, Yi J, He P, Zhou H 2019 Electrochem. Energy Rev. 2 574
Google Scholar
[19] Reddy M V, Julien C M, Mauger A, Zaghib K 2020 Nanomaterials 10 1606
Google Scholar
[20] Manthiram A, Yu X, Wang S 2017 Nat. Rev. Mater. 2 16103
Google Scholar
[21] Murugan R, Thangadurai V, Weppner W 2007 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46 7778
Google Scholar
[22] Sudo R, Nakata Y, Ishiguro K, Matsui M, Hirano A, Takeda Y, Yamamoto O, Imanishi N 2014 Solid State Ionics 262 151
Google Scholar
[23] Luo W, Gong Y, Zhu Y, Fu K K, Dai J, Lacey S D, Wang C, Liu B, Han X, Mo Y, Wachsman E D, Hu L 2016 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 12258
Google Scholar
[24] Meng J, Zhang Y, Zhou X, Lei M, Li C 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 3716
Google Scholar
[25] Sharafi A, Yu S, Naguib M, Lee M, Ma C, Meyer H M, Nanda J, Chi M, Siegel D J, Sakamoto J 2017 J. Mater. Chem. A 5 13475
Google Scholar
[26] Wu J F, Pu B W, Wang D, Shi S Q, Zhao N, Guo X, Guo X 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 898
Google Scholar
[27] Samson A J, Hofstetter K, Bag S, Thangadurai V 2019 Energy Environ. Sci. 12 2957
Google Scholar
[28] Li Y, Wang Z, Cao Y, Du F, Chen C, Cui Z, Guo X 2015 Electrochim. Acta 180 37
Google Scholar
[29] Ohta S, Kobayashi T, Asaoka T 2011 J. Power Sources 196 3342
Google Scholar
[30] Zhu Y, He X, Mo Y 2016 J. Mater. Chem. A 4 3253
Google Scholar
[31] Han F, Zhu Y, He X, Mo Y, Wang C 2016 Adv. Energy Mater. 6 1501590
Google Scholar
[32] Wolfenstine J, Allen J L, Read J, Sakamoto J 2013 J. Mater. Sci. 48 5846
Google Scholar
[33] Tan D H S, Banerjee A, Chen Z, Meng Y S 2020 Nat. Nanotechnol. 15 170
Google Scholar
[34] Connell J G, Zhu Y, Zapol P, Tepavcevic S, Sharafi A, Sakamoto J, Curtiss L A, Fong D D, Freeland J W, Markovic N M 2018 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 17471
Google Scholar
[35] Zhu J, Zhao J, Xiang Y, Lin M, Wang H, Zheng B, He H, Wu Q, Huang J Y, Yang Y 2020 Chem. Mater. 32 4998
Google Scholar
[36] Sharafi A, Meyer H M, Nanda J, Wolfenstine J, Sakamoto J 2016 J. Power Sources 302 135
Google Scholar
[37] Yu S, Siegel D J 2017 Chem. Mater. 29 9639
Google Scholar
[38] Pesci F M, Brugge R H, Hekselman A K O, Cavallaro A, Chater R J, Aguadero A 2018 J. Mater. Chem. A 6 19817
Google Scholar
[39] Han F, Westover A S, Yue J, Fan X, Wang F, Chi M, Leonard D N, Dudney N J, Wang H, Wang C 2019 Nat. Energy 4 187
Google Scholar
[40] Haruyama J, Sodeyama K, Tateyama Y 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 286
Google Scholar
[41] Zarabian M, Bartolini M, Pereira-Almao P, Thangadurai V 2017 J. Electrochem. Soc. 164 A1133
Google Scholar
[42] Liu Y, Sun Q, Liu J, Norouzi Banis M, Zhao Y, Wang B, Adair K, Hu Y, Xiao Q, Zhang C, Zhang L, Lu S, Huang H, Song X, Sun X 2020 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 2293
Google Scholar
[43] Trevey J E, Jung Y S, Lee S H 2011 Electrochim. Acta 56 4243
Google Scholar
[44] Mizuno F, Hayashi A, Tadanaga K, Tatsumisago M 2005 Adv. Mater. 17 918
Google Scholar
[45] Kanno R, Murayama M 2001 J. Electrochem. Soc. 148 A742
Google Scholar
[46] Kanno R, Hata T, Kawamoto Y, Irie M 2000 Solid State Ionics 130 97
Google Scholar
[47] Kamaya N, Homma K, Yamakawa Y, Hirayama M, Kanno R, Yonemura M, Kamiyama T, Kato Y, Hama S, Kawamoto K, Mitsui A 2011 Nat. Mater. 10 682
Google Scholar
[48] Kudu Ö U, Famprikis T, Fleutot B, Braida M-D, Le Mercier T, Islam M S, Masquelier C 2018 J. Power Sources 407 31
Google Scholar
[49] Mizuno F, Hayashi A, Tadanaga K, Tatsumisago M 2006 Solid State Ionics 177 2721
Google Scholar
[50] Liu Z, Fu W, Payzant E A, Yu X, Wu Z, Dudney N J, Kiggans J, Hong K, Rondinone A J, Liang C 2013 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 975
Google Scholar
[51] Dietrich C, Weber D A, Culver S, Senyshyn A, Sedlmaier S J, Indris S, Janek J, Zeier W G 2017 Inorg. Chem. 56 6681
Google Scholar
[52] Seino Y, Ota T, Takada K, Hayashi A, Tatsumisago M 2014 Energy Environ. Sci. 7 627
Google Scholar
[53] Wenzel S, Randau S, Leichtweiß T, Weber D A, Sann J, Zeier W G, Janek J 2016 Chem. Mater. 28 2400
Google Scholar
[54] Zhou P, Wang J, Cheng F, Li F, Chen J 2016 Chem. Commun. 52 6091
Google Scholar
[55] Boulineau S, Courty M, Tarascon J M, Viallet V 2012 Solid State Ionics 221 1
Google Scholar
[56] Zhu Y, He X, Mo Y 2015 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7 23685
Google Scholar
[57] Auvergniot J, Cassel A, Foix D, Viallet V, Seznec V, Dedryvère R 2017 Solid State Ionics 300 78
Google Scholar
[58] Gao Y, Wang D, Li Y C, Yu Z, Mallouk T E, Wang D 2018 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 13608
Google Scholar
[59] Koerver R, Walther F, Aygün I, Sann J, Dietrich C, Zeier W G, Janek J 2017 J. Mater. Chem. A 5 22750
Google Scholar
[60] Du M, Liao K, Lu Q, Shao Z 2019 Energy Environ. Sci. 12 1780
Google Scholar
[61] Ni X, Qian T, Liu X, Xu N, Liu J, Yan C 2018 Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 1706513
Google Scholar
[62] Zhang L, Zhang K, Shi Z, Zhang S 2017 Langmuir 33 11164
Google Scholar
[63] Shi X, Pang Y, Wang B, Sun H, Wang X, Li Y, Yang J, Li H W, Zheng S 2020 Mater. Today Nano 10 100079
Google Scholar
[64] Fan X, Ji X, Han F, Yue J, Chen J, Chen L, Deng T, Jiang J, Wang C 2018 Sci. Adv. 4 eaau9245
Google Scholar
[65] Chang X, Liu H, Yang H, Di J, Tang W, Fu H, Li M, Liu R 2020 J. Materiomics 6 54
Google Scholar
[66] Nagao K, Suyama M, Kato A, Hotehama C, Deguchi M, Sakuda A, Hayashi A, Tatsumisago M 2019 ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2 3042
Google Scholar
[67] Liang J Y, Zhang X D, Zeng X X, Yan M, Yin Y X, Xin S, Wang W P, Wu X W, Shi J L, Wan L J, Guo Y G 2020 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 6585
Google Scholar
[68] Tripathi A M, Su W N, Hwang B J 2018 Chem. Soc. Rev. 47 736
Google Scholar
[69] Sicolo S, Fingerle M, Hausbrand R, Albe K 2017 J. Power Sources 354 124
Google Scholar
[70] Wenzel S, Leichtweiss T, Krüger D, Sann J, Janek J 2015 Solid State Ionics. 278 98
Google Scholar
[71] Liu Z, Li G, A. Borodin, Liu X, Li Y, Endres F 2019 J. Solid State Electrochem. 23 2107
Google Scholar
[72] Jones S D, Akridge J R, Shokoohi F K 1994 Solid State Ionics 69 357
Google Scholar
[73] Lacivita V, Artrith N, Ceder G 2018 Chem. Mater. 30 7077
Google Scholar
[74] Lacivita V, Westover A S, Kercher A, Phillip N D, Yang G, Veith G, Ceder G, Dudney N J 2018 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 11029
Google Scholar
[75] Yu X, Bates J B, Jellison G E, Hart F X 1997 J. Electrochem. Soc. 144 524
Google Scholar
[76] Schwöbel A, Hausbrand R, Jaegermann W 2015 Solid State Ionics 273 51
Google Scholar
[77] Nazri G 1988 MRS Proc. 135 117
[78] Nazri G 1989 Solid State Ionics 34 97
Google Scholar
[79] Maier J, Bunsenges B 1985 Phys. Chem. 89 355
[80] Guo X, Chen C 2016 Acta. Chim. Slov. 63 3
[81] Bañares M A 2005 Catal. Today 100 71
Google Scholar
[82] Palomares V, Sharma N 2019 Front. Energy Res. 7 10
Google Scholar
[83] Wu X, Villevieille C, Novák P, El Kazzi M 2018 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 11123
Google Scholar
[84] Nelson Weker J, Toney M F 2015 Adv. Funct. Mater. 25 1622
Google Scholar
[85] Wood K N, Steirer K X, Hafner S E, et al. 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 2490
Google Scholar
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 13043
- PDF下载量: 511
- 被引次数: 0
