搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

DNA双链退火压力对DNA聚合酶gp5链置换的调控

贾棋 樊秦凯 侯文清 杨晨光 王利邦 王浩 徐春华 李明 陆颖

引用本文:
Citation:

DNA双链退火压力对DNA聚合酶gp5链置换的调控

贾棋, 樊秦凯, 侯文清, 杨晨光, 王利邦, 王浩, 徐春华, 李明, 陆颖

Control of DNA polymerase gp5 chain substitution by DNA double strand annealing pressure

Jia Qi, Fan Qin-Kai, Hou Wen-Qing, Yang Chen-Guang, Wang Li-Bang, Wang Hao, Xu Chun-Hua, Li Ming, Lu Ying
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • DNA聚合酶是执行DNA复制和修复的重要蛋白, 由于其只能从5′向3′方向聚合, 所以在聚合双链DNA时会有两种模式: 其一是先打开DNA双链, 让其暴露出3′-5′方向的模板链(先导链), 然后沿着这条链复制出新链以此置换旧链, 这就是链置换的合成. 另一种是沿着已经置换出的5′-3′方向的模板链(滞后链)进行延伸合成. T7噬菌体作为常被研究的模式生物, 其DNA聚合酶gp5在复制过程中既会参与链置换也会参与延伸合成, 已有的研究报道gp5自身独立链置换的能力很弱, 其与T7解旋酶gp4耦合形成复制体后可以发生快速且持续的链置换, 这一现象的分子机制尚待厘清. 本文通过单分子荧光共振能量转移(smFRET)的方法对gp5聚合过程的动力学进行了研究, 发现gp5在没有外力帮助下时会进入链置换-外切的循环, 导致聚合难以延伸, 调控这一循环的关键则是DNA双链退火压力. 进一步的实验表明gp5和gp4形成复制体后, gp4辅助gp5克服了退火压力从而聚合可以延伸.
    DNA polymerase is essential for DNA replication and repair. As it only performs the 5′-3′ polymerization, there are two kinds of DNA replication. One of them is called strand-displacement synthesis: DNA polymerase opens the double-strand (ds) DNA to attain the 3′-5′strand (leading strand) and copy this template in a continuous way, and the other is extension synthesis: DNA polymerase copies the newly separated 5′-3′ strand (lagging strand) in a discontinuous manner. The replication complex of T7 phage is an optimal model to investigate the mechanism of replication because it is only constituted by 4 terms of protein which are DNA helicase gp4, DNA polymerase gp5 with co-factor thioredoxin (Trx), and single-strand (ss) DNA-binding protein gp2.5. The replication complex of T7 encounters both strand-displacement synthesis and extension synthesis. Previous researches reported that gp5 can have rapid extension synthesis but lacks the ability to attain strand-displacement synthesis. It also reported that gp4 translocates on ssDNA at a rapid speed but unwinds dsDNA at a very low speed. However, gp5 and gp4 together can attain rapid and processive strand-displacement synthesis. Although extensively studied, this mechanism remains unclear. Here in this work, the dynamic of strand-displacement synthesis by gp5 is investigated with single-molecule Förster (fluorescence) resonance energy transfer (smFRET). It is found that gp5, without the help of external tension, can open dsDNA but only attain strand-displacement synthesis about 4 base pairs (bp), because its exonuclease activity excises the nascent nucleotides. Therefore gp5 repeats in the synthesis-excision cycle which results in the less production of strand-displacement synthesis. We conduct another control experiment by nano-tensioner, a high precision smFRET setup which can exert a tension on dsDNA, to change the dsDNA regression pressure on gp5. It is observed that reduced dsDNA regression pressure can increase the length of strand-displacement synthesis and reduce the length of excision which indicates that the dsDNA regression pressure can regulate the strand-displacement synthesis of gp5. The further experiment shows that after gp5 and gp4 are assembled into a replisome, it can have a processive strand-displacement synthesis and barely any excision presented. The speed of replisome is a little higher than gp5 alone but much higher than gp4 alone. Additionally, the length of strand-displacement synthesis by replisome is much longer than gp5 alone. Therefore it is indicated that the gp4 can reduce dsDNA regression pressure to enables gp5 to attain processive strand-displacement synthesis. On the other hand, the gp5 facilitates gp4 to unwind the dsDNA.
      通信作者: 陆颖, yinglu@iphy.ac.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 12090051, 11834018, 12022409)、中国科学院前沿重点研究计划(批准号: QYZDJ-SSW-SYS014)和中国科学院青年创新促进会(批准号: 2017015)资助的课题
      Corresponding author: Lu Ying, yinglu@iphy.ac.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12090051, 11834018, 12022409), the CAS Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, China (Grant No. QYZDJ-SSW-SYS014), and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS (Grant No. 2017015)
    [1]

    Benkovic S J, Valentine A M, Salinas F 2001 Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70 181Google Scholar

    [2]

    O'Donnell M 2006 J. Biol. Chem. 281 10653Google Scholar

    [3]

    Pandey M, Syed S, Donmez I, Patel G, Ha T, Patel S S 2009 Nature 462 940Google Scholar

    [4]

    Sun B, Pandey M, Inman J T, Yang Y, Kashlev M, Patel S S, Wang M D 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 10260Google Scholar

    [5]

    Kath J E, Jergic S, Heltzel J M, Jacob D T, Dixon N E, Sutton M D, Walker G C, Loparo J J 2014 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111 7647Google Scholar

    [6]

    Nandakumar D, Pandey M, Patel S S 2015 Elife 4 e06562Google Scholar

    [7]

    Pandey M, Patel S S 2014 Cell Rep. 6 1129Google Scholar

    [8]

    Syed S, Pandey M, Patel S S, Ha T 2014 Cell Rep. 6 1037Google Scholar

    [9]

    Gao Y, Cui Y, Fox T, Lin S, Wang H, de Val N, Zhou Z H, Yang W 2019 Science 363 eaav7003Google Scholar

    [10]

    Stano N M, Jeong Y J, Donmez I, Tummalapalli P, Levin M K, Patel S S 2005 Nature 435 370Google Scholar

    [11]

    Manosas M, Spiering M M, Ding F, Bensimon D, Allemand J F, Benkovic S J, Croquette V 2012 Nucleic Acids Res. 40 6174Google Scholar

    [12]

    Lin W, Ma J, Nong D, Xu C, Zhang B, Li J, Jia Q, Dou S, Ye F, Xi X, Lu Y, Li M 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 138102Google Scholar

    [13]

    Ma J B, Jia Q, Xu C H, Li J H, Huang X Y, Ma D F, Li M, Xi X G, Lu Y 2018 J. Phys. Chem. B 122 5790Google Scholar

    [14]

    黄星榞, 隋明宇, 侯文清, 李明, 陆颖, 徐春华 2020 物理学报 69 208706Google Scholar

    Huang X Y, Sui M Y, Hou W Q, Li M, Lu Y, Xu C H 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 208706Google Scholar

    [15]

    Kim D E, Narayan M, Patel S S 2002 J. Mol. Biol. 321 807Google Scholar

    [16]

    Ma J B, Chen Z, Xu C H, Huang X Y, Jia Q, Zou Z Y, Mi C Y, Ma D F, Lu Y, Zhang H D, Li M 2020 Nucleic Acids Res. 48 3156Google Scholar

    [17]

    Schwartz J J, Quake S R 2009 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 20294Google Scholar

    [18]

    Ha T 2001 Methods 25 78Google Scholar

    [19]

    Etson C M, Hamdan S M, Richardson C C, van Oijen A M 2010 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107 1900Google Scholar

    [20]

    Ibarra B, Chemla Y R, Plyasunov S, Smith S B, Lazaro J M, Salas M, Bustamante C 2009 EMBO J. 28 2794Google Scholar

    [21]

    Hoekstra T P, Depken M, Lin S N, Cabanas-Danes J, Gross P, Dame R T, Peterman E J G, Wuite G J L 2017 Biophys. J. 112 575Google Scholar

    [22]

    Johansson E, Dixon N 2013 Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5 a012799Google Scholar

    [23]

    Derbyshire V, Freemont P S, Sanderson M R, Beese L, Friedman J M, Joyce C M, Steitz T A 1988 Science 240 199Google Scholar

    [24]

    Lam W C, Van der Schans E J, Joyce C M, Millar D P 1998 Biochemistry 37 1513Google Scholar

    [25]

    Graham J E, Marians K J, Kowalczykowski S C 2017 Cell 169 1201Google Scholar

    [26]

    陈泽, 马建兵, 黄星榞, 贾棋, 徐春华, 张慧东, 陆颖 2018 物理学报 67 118201Google Scholar

    Chen Z, Ma J-B, Huang X Y, Jia Q, Xu C H, Zhang H D, Lu Y 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 118201Google Scholar

  • 图 1  exo+ gp5和exo gp5的PAGE实验 (a)电泳实验的DNA, 在引物链5′端标记有Alexa488; (b) 对Alexa488照明得到的结果: 第1个条带为DNA的原始长度, 第2个条带是exo+ gp5合成1 min后的结果, 第3个条带是exo gp5合成1 min后的结果, 第4个条带是exo+ gp5合成5 min后的结果, 第5个条带是exo gp5合成5 min后的结果

    Fig. 1.  PAGE assays of exo+ gp5 and exo gp5. (a) Illustration of DNA that used in PAGE assays. Alexa488 is labeled on the 5′ overhand of primer DNA. (b) Results of various condition. The first lane: Original length of the DNA. The second lane: The synthesis-product of exo+ gp5 with 1 minute. The third lane: The synthesis-product of exo gp5 with 1 minute. The fourth lane: The synthesis-product of exo+ gp5 with 5 minute. The fifth lane: The synthesis-product of exo gp5 with 5 minute.

    图 2  T7 DNA聚合酶gp5不断重复链置换和外切 (a), (b)没有结合辅助因子Trx时聚合酶无法链置换DNA双链; (c), (d)有辅助因子Trx时聚合酶能够部分链置换DNA, 但是会回退; (e), (f)外切活性突变后的gp5不会再外切; (g) exo+ gp5 + Trx实验中合成长度的统计图, 其分布满足单e指数; (h) exo+ gp5 + Trx实验中外切长度的统计图, 其分布满足单e指数

    Fig. 2.  T7 DNA polymerase gp5 repeats in synthesis-excision cycle: (a), (b) exo+ gp5 cannot have displacement synthesis without co-factor Trx; (c), (d) gp5 with Trx repeats in synthesis-excision cycle; (e), (f) exo gp5 attain full-length displacement synthesis without excision; (g) histogram of synthesis processivity from assay of exo+ gp5 + Trx, the distribution is well fit by an exponential; (h) histogram of excision processivity from assay of exo+ gp5+ Trx, the distribution is well fit by an exponential.

    图 4  T7 DNA解旋酶帮助聚合酶克服退火压力 (a) gp4, exo+ gp5和Trx共同链置换的示意图, (b) gp4, exo+ gp5和Trx共同链置换时的典型曲线; (c) exo+ gp5 + Trx + gp4可以完全链置换; (d)不同情况的链置换速度

    Fig. 4.  gp4 decrease DNA regression pressure which facilitate gp5 to attain processive strand-displacement synthesis: (a) Illustration of displacement by gp4, exo+ gp5 and Trx; (b) typical trace from assay of gp4, exo+ gp5 and Trx; (c) exo+ gp5 + Trx + gp4 attain processive synthesis; (d) synthesis speed in various condition.

    图 3  T7 DNA聚合酶gp5外切的原因是退火压力 (a)纳米张力器示意图; (b) 纳米张力器实验的典型曲线; (c) exo+ gp5 + Trx在受力后合成长度的统计图, 其分布满足单e指数; (d) exo+ gp5 + Trx受力后外切长度的统计图, 其分布满足单e指数

    Fig. 3.  DNA regression pressure induced exonuclease activity: (a) Illustration of nanotensionior; (b) typical trace from assay of nanotensionior; (c) histogram of synthesis processivity from assay of exo+ gp5 + Trx with tension, the distribution is well fit by an exponential; (d) histogram of excision processivity from assay of exo+ gp5 + Trx with tension, the distribution is well fit by an exponential.

    图 5  T7 DNA聚合酶不同情况链置换时的模型 (a) 野生型gp5单独链置换时进入链置换和外切的循环; (b) 野生型gp5在gp4的帮助下, 没有外切的出现可以持续链置换

    Fig. 5.  Model for gp5 strand displacement activity in various condition: (a) exo+ gp5 repeats in synthesis-excision cycle; (b) gp4 facilitate exo+ gp5 to attain processive strand-displacement synthesis.

  • [1]

    Benkovic S J, Valentine A M, Salinas F 2001 Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70 181Google Scholar

    [2]

    O'Donnell M 2006 J. Biol. Chem. 281 10653Google Scholar

    [3]

    Pandey M, Syed S, Donmez I, Patel G, Ha T, Patel S S 2009 Nature 462 940Google Scholar

    [4]

    Sun B, Pandey M, Inman J T, Yang Y, Kashlev M, Patel S S, Wang M D 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 10260Google Scholar

    [5]

    Kath J E, Jergic S, Heltzel J M, Jacob D T, Dixon N E, Sutton M D, Walker G C, Loparo J J 2014 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111 7647Google Scholar

    [6]

    Nandakumar D, Pandey M, Patel S S 2015 Elife 4 e06562Google Scholar

    [7]

    Pandey M, Patel S S 2014 Cell Rep. 6 1129Google Scholar

    [8]

    Syed S, Pandey M, Patel S S, Ha T 2014 Cell Rep. 6 1037Google Scholar

    [9]

    Gao Y, Cui Y, Fox T, Lin S, Wang H, de Val N, Zhou Z H, Yang W 2019 Science 363 eaav7003Google Scholar

    [10]

    Stano N M, Jeong Y J, Donmez I, Tummalapalli P, Levin M K, Patel S S 2005 Nature 435 370Google Scholar

    [11]

    Manosas M, Spiering M M, Ding F, Bensimon D, Allemand J F, Benkovic S J, Croquette V 2012 Nucleic Acids Res. 40 6174Google Scholar

    [12]

    Lin W, Ma J, Nong D, Xu C, Zhang B, Li J, Jia Q, Dou S, Ye F, Xi X, Lu Y, Li M 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 138102Google Scholar

    [13]

    Ma J B, Jia Q, Xu C H, Li J H, Huang X Y, Ma D F, Li M, Xi X G, Lu Y 2018 J. Phys. Chem. B 122 5790Google Scholar

    [14]

    黄星榞, 隋明宇, 侯文清, 李明, 陆颖, 徐春华 2020 物理学报 69 208706Google Scholar

    Huang X Y, Sui M Y, Hou W Q, Li M, Lu Y, Xu C H 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 208706Google Scholar

    [15]

    Kim D E, Narayan M, Patel S S 2002 J. Mol. Biol. 321 807Google Scholar

    [16]

    Ma J B, Chen Z, Xu C H, Huang X Y, Jia Q, Zou Z Y, Mi C Y, Ma D F, Lu Y, Zhang H D, Li M 2020 Nucleic Acids Res. 48 3156Google Scholar

    [17]

    Schwartz J J, Quake S R 2009 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 20294Google Scholar

    [18]

    Ha T 2001 Methods 25 78Google Scholar

    [19]

    Etson C M, Hamdan S M, Richardson C C, van Oijen A M 2010 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107 1900Google Scholar

    [20]

    Ibarra B, Chemla Y R, Plyasunov S, Smith S B, Lazaro J M, Salas M, Bustamante C 2009 EMBO J. 28 2794Google Scholar

    [21]

    Hoekstra T P, Depken M, Lin S N, Cabanas-Danes J, Gross P, Dame R T, Peterman E J G, Wuite G J L 2017 Biophys. J. 112 575Google Scholar

    [22]

    Johansson E, Dixon N 2013 Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5 a012799Google Scholar

    [23]

    Derbyshire V, Freemont P S, Sanderson M R, Beese L, Friedman J M, Joyce C M, Steitz T A 1988 Science 240 199Google Scholar

    [24]

    Lam W C, Van der Schans E J, Joyce C M, Millar D P 1998 Biochemistry 37 1513Google Scholar

    [25]

    Graham J E, Marians K J, Kowalczykowski S C 2017 Cell 169 1201Google Scholar

    [26]

    陈泽, 马建兵, 黄星榞, 贾棋, 徐春华, 张慧东, 陆颖 2018 物理学报 67 118201Google Scholar

    Chen Z, Ma J-B, Huang X Y, Jia Q, Xu C H, Zhang H D, Lu Y 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 118201Google Scholar

  • [1] 高凡, 袁鹏, 黄浩彬, 寇琦, 贾青, 远晓辉, 张喆, 张杰, 郑坚. 双锥对撞点火实验中的交叉束能量转移与背向受激布里渊散射. 物理学报, 2023, 72(17): 175203. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230442
    [2] 樊秦凯, 杨晨光, 胡书新, 徐春华, 李明, 陆颖. 基于热还原氧化石墨烯的单分子表面诱导荧光衰逝技术. 物理学报, 2023, 72(14): 147801. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230450
    [3] 罗泽伟, 武戈, 陈挚, 邓驰楠, 万蓉, 杨涛, 庄正飞, 陈同生. 双通道结构光照明超分辨定量荧光共振能量转移成像系统. 物理学报, 2023, 72(20): 208701. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230853
    [4] 马东飞, 侯文清, 徐春华, 赵春雨, 马建兵, 黄星榞, 贾棋, 马璐, 刘聪, 李明, 陆颖. 脂质体包裹荧光受体方法研究α-突触核蛋白在磷脂膜上的结构和动态特征. 物理学报, 2020, 69(3): 038701. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191607
    [5] 李东阳, 张远宪, 欧永雄, 普小云. 聚二甲基硅氧烷微流道中光流控荧光共振能量转移激光. 物理学报, 2019, 68(5): 054203. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181696
    [6] 陆越, 马建兵, 滕翠娟, 陆颖, 李明, 徐春华. 单分子动力学研究大肠杆菌单链结合蛋白与单链DNA的结合过程. 物理学报, 2018, 67(8): 088201. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180109
    [7] 滕翠娟, 陆越, 马建兵, 李明, 陆颖, 徐春华. 用单分子技术研究Sso7d与DNA的相互作用. 物理学报, 2018, 67(14): 148201. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180630
    [8] 陈泽, 马建兵, 黄星榞, 贾棋, 徐春华, 张慧东, 陆颖. 单分子技术研究T7解旋酶的解旋与换链. 物理学报, 2018, 67(11): 118201. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180501
    [9] 秦亚强, 陈瑞云, 石莹, 周海涛, 张国峰, 秦成兵, 高岩, 肖连团, 贾锁堂. 共轭聚合物单分子构象和能量转移特性研究. 物理学报, 2017, 66(24): 248201. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.248201
    [10] 吕袭明, 李辉, 尤菁, 李伟, 王鹏业, 李明, 奚绪光, 窦硕星. 单分子荧光共振能量转移数据处理的优化算法. 物理学报, 2017, 66(11): 118701. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.118701
    [11] 肖石燕, 梁好均. DNA及基于DNA链替换反应的分子计算. 物理学报, 2016, 65(17): 178106. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.178106
    [12] 李牧野, 李芳, 魏来, 何志聪, 张俊佩, 韩俊波, 陆培祥. CdTe量子点与罗丹明B水溶液体系下的双光子激发荧光共振能量转移. 物理学报, 2015, 64(10): 108201. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.108201
    [13] 何志聪, 李芳, 李牧野, 魏来. CdTe量子点-铜酞菁复合体系荧光共振能量转移的研究. 物理学报, 2015, 64(4): 046802. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.046802
    [14] 耿读艳, 谢红娟, 万晓伟, 徐桂芝. 基于DNA损伤的蛋白调控网络研究. 物理学报, 2014, 63(1): 018702. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.018702
    [15] 王爽, 郑海子, 赵振业, 陆越, 徐春华. 全内反射瞬逝场照明高精度磁镊及其在DNA解旋酶研究中的应用. 物理学报, 2013, 62(16): 168703. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.168703
    [16] 庞哲, 王爽, 李辉, 徐春华, 李明. 用荧光显微示踪方法研究RecA在DNA同源识别过程中的工作机理. 物理学报, 2012, 61(21): 218701. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.218701
    [17] 刘小良, 徐 慧, 马松山, 邓超生, 郭爱敏. DNA分子链的电子局域性质及电导的研究. 物理学报, 2006, 55(10): 5562-5567. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.5562
    [18] 马松山, 徐 慧, 刘小良, 郭爱敏. DNA分子链电子结构特性研究. 物理学报, 2006, 55(6): 3170-3174. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.3170
    [19] 魏志勇, 臧黎慧, 李 明, 范 我, 许玉杰. 射线引起DNA双链断裂的统计分布. 物理学报, 2005, 54(10): 4955-4960. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.4955
    [20] 吴世英, 张益, 雷晓玲, 胡钧, 艾小白, 李民乾. 用液流操纵单个DNA分子形成纳米悬链线图形. 物理学报, 2002, 51(8): 1887-1891. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.1887
计量
  • 文章访问数:  5611
  • PDF下载量:  76
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-04-14
  • 修回日期:  2021-05-07
  • 上网日期:  2021-06-07
  • 刊出日期:  2021-08-05

/

返回文章
返回