-
采用一种明显依赖于电子-电子距离的多参考组态相互作用方法, 结合ACVQZ基组进行了
${\rm CH}_2^+ $ 体系的从头算计算. 采用置换不变多项式神经网络方法对从头算得到的18222个单点能进行了拟合. 此外, 将势能面的特征与可得到的实验结果和理论结果进行了比较. 结果表明新构建的势能面比以往的势能面更加精确. 基于新构建的势能面, 采用准经典轨线方法进行了C+ + H2反应的动力学计算, 报道了积分截面和微分截面等动力学信息, 并与之前的理论结果进行了比较. 动力学结果表明在反应过程中插入反应机理占据主导地位.-
关键词:
- $ {\rm CH}_2^+ $体系 /
- 势能面 /
- 积分截面 /
- 微分截面
The multi-reference interaction method is explicitly dependent on the electron-electron distance, and ACVQZ basis set is used in the ab initio calculation. The potential energy surface (PES) is fitted by using the permutation invariant polynomial neural network method based on 18222 ab initio points. In addition, the topographical features of the PES are compared with available theoretical and experimental data. The results indicate that the present PES is more accurate and can be applied to any type of dynamic study. In order to validate the PES, the dynamic study of the C+ + H2 → H + CH+ reaction is carried out by using the quasi-classical trajectory method in a collision energy range of 0.4–1.0 eV. The integral cross sections and differential cross sections are calculated and compared with previous theoretical studies. For the integral cross section, the present results are, in general, in good agreement with previous theoretical studies, both of which increase with collision energy increasing. The forward and backward symmetric differential cross sections indicate that the “complex-forming” mechanism plays a dominant role in the reaction.-
Keywords:
- $ {\rm CH}_2^+ $ system /
- potential energy surface /
- integral cross section /
- differential cross section
[1] Douglas A E, Herzberg G 1941 Astrophys. J. 94 381Google Scholar
[2] Hierl P M, Morris R A, Viggiano A A 1997 J. Chem. Phys. 106 10145Google Scholar
[3] Plasil R, Mehner T, Dohnal P, Kotrik T, Glosik J, Gerlich D 2011 Astrophys. J. 737 60Google Scholar
[4] Armentrout P B 2000 Int. J. Mass Spect. 200 219Google Scholar
[5] Luca A, Borodi G, Gerlich D 2006 Photonic, Electronic and Atomic Collisions (Singapore: World Scientific)
[6] Federer W, Villinger H, Howorka F, Lindinger W, Tosi P, Bassi D, Ferguson E 1984 Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 2084Google Scholar
[7] Stoecklin T, Halvick P 2005 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7 2446Google Scholar
[8] Halvick P, Stoecklin T, Larrégaray P, Bonnet L 2007 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 9 582Google Scholar
[9] Zanchet A, Godard B, Bulut N, Roncero O, Halvick P, Cernicharo J 2013 Astrophys. J. 766 80Google Scholar
[10] Warmbier R, Schneider R 2011 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13 10285Google Scholar
[11] Li Y Q, Zhang P Y, Han K L 2015 J. Chem. Phys. 142 124302Google Scholar
[12] Guo J, Zhang A J, Zhou Y, Liu J Y, Jia J F, Wu H S 2017 Chem. Phys. Lett. 689 121Google Scholar
[13] Sundaram P, Manivannan V, Padamanadan R 2017 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19 20172Google Scholar
[14] Sundaram P, Padamanadan R 2018 J. Chem. Phys. 148 164306Google Scholar
[15] Sundaram P, Padamanadan R 2020 J. Phys. B-At. Mol. Opt. 53 105201Google Scholar
[16] Wu H, Duan Z, Chen G 2020 Chem. Phys. Lett. 755 137783Google Scholar
[17] Guo L, Ma H Y, Zhang L L, Song Y Z, Li Y Q 2018 RSC Adv. 8 13635Google Scholar
[18] Herráez-Aguilar D, Jambrina P G, et al. 2014 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16 24800Google Scholar
[19] Werfelli G, Halvick P, Honvault P, Kerkeni B, Stoecklin T 2015 J. Chem. Phys. 143 114304Google Scholar
[20] Bovino S, Grassi T, Gianturco F A 2015 J. Phys. Chem. A 119 11973Google Scholar
[21] Faure A, Halvick P, Stoecklin T, et al. 2017 Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 469 612Google Scholar
[22] Guo L, Yang Y F, Fan X X, Ma F C, Li Y Q 2017 Commun. Theor. Phys. 67 549Google Scholar
[23] Gerlich D, Horning S 1992 Chem. Rev. 92 1509Google Scholar
[24] Gerlich D, Borodi G, Luca A, Mogo C, Smith M 2011 Z. Phys. Chem. 225 475Google Scholar
[25] Biglari Z, Shayesteh A, Maghari A 2014 Comput. Theor. Chem. 1047 22Google Scholar
[26] Reddy R R, Nazeer A Y, Rama G K, Baba B D 2004 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 85 105Google Scholar
[27] Varandas A J C 1996 J. Chem. Phys. 105 3524Google Scholar
[28] Song Y Z, Zhang Y, Zhang L L, Gao S B, Meng Q T 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 063101Google Scholar
[29] Yang C L, Huang Y J, Zhang X, Han K L 2003 J. Mol. Struct.: Theochem. 625 289Google Scholar
[30] May A J, Valeev E F, Polly R, Manby F R 2005 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7 2710Google Scholar
[31] Dunning T H 1989 J. Chem. Phys. 90 1007Google Scholar
[32] Kendall R A, Dunning T H, Harrison R J 1992 J. Chem. Phys. 96 6796Google Scholar
[33] Werner H J, Knowles P J 1985 J. Chem. Phys. 82 5053Google Scholar
[34] Knowles P J, Werner H J 1985 Chem. Phys. Lett. 115 259Google Scholar
[35] Jiang B, Li J, Guo H 2016 Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 35 479Google Scholar
[36] Jiang B, Guo H 2013 J. Chem. Phys. 139 054112Google Scholar
[37] Li W T, He D, Sun Z G 2019 J. Chem. Phys. 151 185102Google Scholar
[38] Li W T, Wang X M, Zhao H L, He D 2020 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22 16203Google Scholar
[39] Hagan M T, Menhaj M B 1994 IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 5 989Google Scholar
[40] Hakalla R, Kępa R, Szajna W, Zachwieja M 2006 Eur. Phys. J. D 38 481Google Scholar
[41] Huber K P, Herzberg G 1979 Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure IV: Constants of Diatomic Molecules (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold)
[42] Hase W L 1998 Classical Trajectory Simulations: Initial Conditions, A Chapter in Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry (Vol. 1) (New York: Wiley) pp 399–402
-
图 1 (a)键角在136.68°时, 化学键伸缩的等势线图(等势线的起点为–9.1 eV, 间隔为0.4 eV); (b) C+离子以C2v对称性接近H2分子中心的等势线图(等势线的起点为–9.1 eV, 间隔为0.37 eV)
Fig. 1. (a) Contour plot for chemical bond stretching, in which the angle is fixed at 136.68° (Contours starting at –9.1 eV and equally spaced by 0.4 eV); (b) contour plot for the C+ ion approach to the midpoint of H2 molecule in the C2v symmetry (Contours starting at –9.1 eV and equally spaced by 0.37 eV).
图 2 (a) 当
$ {R}_{{\mathrm{C}\mathrm{H}}^{+}}=2.136 $ Bohr时, H原子绕CH+离子运动的等势线; (b) 当$ {R}_{\mathrm{H}\mathrm{H}}=1.401 $ Bohr时, C+离子围绕H2分子运动的等势线.Fig. 2. (a) Contour plot for the H atom moves around CH+ ion at the bond distance
$ {R}_{{\mathrm{C}\mathrm{H}}^{+}}=2.136 $ Bohr; (b) contour plot for C+ ion moves around H2 molecule at its equilibrium geometry$ {R}_{\mathrm{H}\mathrm{H}}=1.401 $ Bohr.表 1 CH+和H2分子的光谱常数
Table 1. Spectroscopic constants of the CH+ and H2 molecules.
re /Bohr ωe /cm–1 ωexe /cm–1 βe /cm–1 αe /cm–1 De /eV CH+(${X}^{1}{{\Sigma } }^{+}$) 本文结果 2.136 2860.31 59.32 14.217 0.501 4.257 理论[11] 2.136 2853.03 58.52 14.201 0.489 4.252 理论[25] 2.136 2851.0 58.1 14.199 0.489 4.244 理论[26] 2.144 2849.03 66.45 14.094 0.490 理论[17] 2.135 2861.95 59.63 14.311 0.447 4.257 实验[40] 2.137 2857.56 59.32 14.178 0.495 4.26 H2(${X}^{1}{{\Sigma } }_{\mathrm{g} }^{+}$) 本文结果 1.401 4407.63 139.43 60.85 3.012 4.751 理论[17] 1.401 4404.61 126.64 60.861 2.233 4.749 理论[27] 1.401 4403.60 126.60 60.864 2.232 4.748 理论[28] 1.403 4395.22 126.12 60.735 2.221 4.748 理论[29] 1.401 4389.66 121.56 60.826 3.162 4.711 实验[41] 1.401 4401.21 121.33 60.853 3.062 4.746 -
[1] Douglas A E, Herzberg G 1941 Astrophys. J. 94 381Google Scholar
[2] Hierl P M, Morris R A, Viggiano A A 1997 J. Chem. Phys. 106 10145Google Scholar
[3] Plasil R, Mehner T, Dohnal P, Kotrik T, Glosik J, Gerlich D 2011 Astrophys. J. 737 60Google Scholar
[4] Armentrout P B 2000 Int. J. Mass Spect. 200 219Google Scholar
[5] Luca A, Borodi G, Gerlich D 2006 Photonic, Electronic and Atomic Collisions (Singapore: World Scientific)
[6] Federer W, Villinger H, Howorka F, Lindinger W, Tosi P, Bassi D, Ferguson E 1984 Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 2084Google Scholar
[7] Stoecklin T, Halvick P 2005 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7 2446Google Scholar
[8] Halvick P, Stoecklin T, Larrégaray P, Bonnet L 2007 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 9 582Google Scholar
[9] Zanchet A, Godard B, Bulut N, Roncero O, Halvick P, Cernicharo J 2013 Astrophys. J. 766 80Google Scholar
[10] Warmbier R, Schneider R 2011 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13 10285Google Scholar
[11] Li Y Q, Zhang P Y, Han K L 2015 J. Chem. Phys. 142 124302Google Scholar
[12] Guo J, Zhang A J, Zhou Y, Liu J Y, Jia J F, Wu H S 2017 Chem. Phys. Lett. 689 121Google Scholar
[13] Sundaram P, Manivannan V, Padamanadan R 2017 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19 20172Google Scholar
[14] Sundaram P, Padamanadan R 2018 J. Chem. Phys. 148 164306Google Scholar
[15] Sundaram P, Padamanadan R 2020 J. Phys. B-At. Mol. Opt. 53 105201Google Scholar
[16] Wu H, Duan Z, Chen G 2020 Chem. Phys. Lett. 755 137783Google Scholar
[17] Guo L, Ma H Y, Zhang L L, Song Y Z, Li Y Q 2018 RSC Adv. 8 13635Google Scholar
[18] Herráez-Aguilar D, Jambrina P G, et al. 2014 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16 24800Google Scholar
[19] Werfelli G, Halvick P, Honvault P, Kerkeni B, Stoecklin T 2015 J. Chem. Phys. 143 114304Google Scholar
[20] Bovino S, Grassi T, Gianturco F A 2015 J. Phys. Chem. A 119 11973Google Scholar
[21] Faure A, Halvick P, Stoecklin T, et al. 2017 Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 469 612Google Scholar
[22] Guo L, Yang Y F, Fan X X, Ma F C, Li Y Q 2017 Commun. Theor. Phys. 67 549Google Scholar
[23] Gerlich D, Horning S 1992 Chem. Rev. 92 1509Google Scholar
[24] Gerlich D, Borodi G, Luca A, Mogo C, Smith M 2011 Z. Phys. Chem. 225 475Google Scholar
[25] Biglari Z, Shayesteh A, Maghari A 2014 Comput. Theor. Chem. 1047 22Google Scholar
[26] Reddy R R, Nazeer A Y, Rama G K, Baba B D 2004 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 85 105Google Scholar
[27] Varandas A J C 1996 J. Chem. Phys. 105 3524Google Scholar
[28] Song Y Z, Zhang Y, Zhang L L, Gao S B, Meng Q T 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 063101Google Scholar
[29] Yang C L, Huang Y J, Zhang X, Han K L 2003 J. Mol. Struct.: Theochem. 625 289Google Scholar
[30] May A J, Valeev E F, Polly R, Manby F R 2005 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7 2710Google Scholar
[31] Dunning T H 1989 J. Chem. Phys. 90 1007Google Scholar
[32] Kendall R A, Dunning T H, Harrison R J 1992 J. Chem. Phys. 96 6796Google Scholar
[33] Werner H J, Knowles P J 1985 J. Chem. Phys. 82 5053Google Scholar
[34] Knowles P J, Werner H J 1985 Chem. Phys. Lett. 115 259Google Scholar
[35] Jiang B, Li J, Guo H 2016 Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 35 479Google Scholar
[36] Jiang B, Guo H 2013 J. Chem. Phys. 139 054112Google Scholar
[37] Li W T, He D, Sun Z G 2019 J. Chem. Phys. 151 185102Google Scholar
[38] Li W T, Wang X M, Zhao H L, He D 2020 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22 16203Google Scholar
[39] Hagan M T, Menhaj M B 1994 IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 5 989Google Scholar
[40] Hakalla R, Kępa R, Szajna W, Zachwieja M 2006 Eur. Phys. J. D 38 481Google Scholar
[41] Huber K P, Herzberg G 1979 Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure IV: Constants of Diatomic Molecules (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold)
[42] Hase W L 1998 Classical Trajectory Simulations: Initial Conditions, A Chapter in Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry (Vol. 1) (New York: Wiley) pp 399–402
计量
- 文章访问数: 4555
- PDF下载量: 72
- 被引次数: 0