-
新兴二维材料MoSi2N4因其卓越的半导体性能, 包括出色的环境稳定性和高载流子迁移率而受到相当多的关注. 然而, 半导体中的本征缺陷往往不可避免并且会显著影响器件性能. 本文使用密度泛函理论计算并分析了MoSi2N4中本征点缺陷的性质及其产生的影响. 首先确认了该材料物理性质与目前实验数据的一致性, 之后通过计算12种本征缺陷的形成能, 发现钼替硅型反位缺陷(MoSi)在所有本征缺陷中占主导地位. 在整体电荷保持中性的约束条件下, 通过自洽费米能级计算, 本文发现仅仅引入本征缺陷的MoSi2N4会表现出本征特征, 这体现了其作为半导体器件材料的潜力, 然而该本征性质与在生长过程中观察到的二维 MoSi2N4的p型特征相矛盾. 而在后来的缺陷浓度计算中, 发现对于MoSi2N4用适当的杂质进行掺杂, 可以实现n型和p型半导体特征, 且本征缺陷的补偿效应很弱. 这表明在生长过程中MoSi2N4的p型特征可能是由于非平衡生长条件下引入的杂质或硅空位缺陷造成的. 本工作不仅展示了MoSi2N4在半导体器件应用上的潜力, 还为未来该材料缺陷机理的研究提供了数据支撑.MoSi2N4 is an emergent two-dimensional (2D) material, which has received much attention because of its excellent performance over semiconductors, including excellent environmental stability and high carrier mobility. However, the formation of intrinsic defects in semiconductors is often inevitable and can significantly affect device performance. By using density functional theory (DFT), we analyze the properties and effects of intrinsic point defects in MoSi2N4. We first confirm the consistency of our results with current experimental data. After that, the formation energy values of twelve native defects reveal that the antisite defect of molybdenum substituting for silicon (MoSi) defect dominates in all intrinsic defects. Under the constraint of overall charge neutrality, self-consistent Fermi level calculations reveal that MoSi2N4 with only intrinsic defects exhibits intrinsic characteristics, highlighting its potential as a semiconductor device material. However, this intrinsic nature contradicts the p-type characteristics observed in two-dimensional MoSi2N4. In the subsequent defect concentrations, we find that both n-type and p-type behavior can be easily realized by doping appropriate impurities without being compensated by native defects. This suggests that the p-type characteristics of MoSi2N4 during growth may result from p-type impurities introduced under non-equilibrium growth conditions or silicon vacancy defects. Our findings not only demonstrate the potential applications of MoSi2N4 in semiconductor devices but also provide valuable guidance for future studying the defect mechanisms of this material.
-
Keywords:
- density functional theory /
- intrinsic defects /
- charged defects energy correction /
- 2-dimensional materials
[1] Hong Y L, Liu Z B, Wang L, Zhou T Y, Ma W, Xu C, Feng S, Chen L, Chen M L, Sun D M, Chen X Q, Cheng H M, Ren W C 2020 Science 369 670Google Scholar
[2] Sun X T, Song Z G, Huo N N, Liu S Q, Yang C, Yang J, Wang W Z, Lu J 2021 J. Mater. Chem. C 9 14683Google Scholar
[3] Huang J, Li P, Ren X, Guo Z X 2021 Phys. Rev. Appl. 16 044022Google Scholar
[4] Nandan K, Ghosh B, Agarwal A, Bhowmick S, Chauhan Y S 2021 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 69 406Google Scholar
[5] Liu Y B, Zhang T, Dou K Y, Du W H, Peng R, Dai Y, Huang B B, Ma Y D 2021 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12 8341Google Scholar
[6] Chi Y H, Chen Z N, Ma H, Yuan S F, Hao C L, Ren H, Zhao W, Zhu H Y, Ling C C, Guo W Y 2023 Appl. Catal. A 650 118975Google Scholar
[7] Xiao C W, Ma Z J, Sa R J, Cui Z T, Gao S S, Du W, Sun X Q, Li Q H 2022 ACS Omega 7 8706Google Scholar
[8] Xiao C W, Sa R J, Cui Z T, Gao S S, Du W, Sun X Q, Zhang X T, Li Q H, Ma Z J 2021 Appl. Surf. Sci. 563 150388Google Scholar
[9] Bafekry A, Faraji M, Fadlallah M, Ziabari A A, Khatibani A B, Feghhi S, Ghergherehchi M, Gogova D 2021 Appl. Surf. Sci. 564 150326Google Scholar
[10] Bafekry A, Faraji M, Fadlallah M M, Khatibani A B, Ziabari A A, Ghergherehchi M, Nedaei S, Shayesteh S F, Gogova D 2021 Appl. Surf. Sci. 559 149862Google Scholar
[11] Ma H, Zhao W, Zhang Q, Liu D Y, Ren H, Zhu H Y, Chi Y H, Ding F, Guo W Y 2022 Appl. Surf. Sci. 592 153214Google Scholar
[12] Hashibon A, Elsässer C 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 144117Google Scholar
[13] Janotti A, Van de Walle C G 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76 165202Google Scholar
[14] Yang C, Song Z G, Sun X T, Lu J 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 035308Google Scholar
[15] Xiong J, Di J, Xia J X, Zhu W S, Li H M 2018 Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 1801983Google Scholar
[16] Zheng Y J, Chen Y, Huang Y L, Gogoi P K, Li M Y, Li L J, Trevisanutto P E, Wang Q, Pennycook S J, Wee A T 2019 ACS Nano 13 6050Google Scholar
[17] Komsa H P, Berseneva N, Krasheninnikov A V, Nieminen R M 2018 Phys. Rev. X 8 031044Google Scholar
[18] Kresse G, Furthmuller J 1996 Comput. Mater. Sci 6 15Google Scholar
[19] Kresse G, Furthmuller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169Google Scholar
[20] Heyd J, Scuseria G E 2004 J. Chem. Phys. 121 1187Google Scholar
[21] Liu X F, Gao Z B, Wang V, Luo Z J, Lv B, Ding Z, Zhang Z F 2020 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 17055Google Scholar
[22] Freysoldt C, Neugebauer J 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 205425Google Scholar
[23] Li S, Thiering G, Udvarhelyi P, Ivády V, Gali A 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 1210Google Scholar
[24] Sopiha K V, Malyi O I, Persson C, Wu P 2021 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 33664Google Scholar
[25] Wang W, Strohbeen P J, Lee D, Zhou C, Kawasaki J K, Choi K S, Liu M, Galli G 2020 Chem. Mater. 32 2899Google Scholar
[26] Buckeridge J 2019 Comput. Phys. Commun. 244 329Google Scholar
[27] Buckeridge J, Veal T D, Catlow C R A, Scanlon D O 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 035207Google Scholar
[28] Bafekry A, Faraji M, Hoat D M, Shahrokhi M, Fadlallah M M, Shojaei F, Feghhi S A H, Ghergherehchi M, Gogova D 2021 J. Phys. s D Appl. Phys. 54 155303Google Scholar
[29] Yadav P, Khamari B, Singh B, Adarsh K, Agarwal A 2023 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 35 235701Google Scholar
[30] Li S, Wu W K, Feng X L, Guan S, Feng W X, Yao Y G, Yang S A 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 235435Google Scholar
[31] Brachman M K 1954 J. Chem. Phys. 22 1152Google Scholar
[32] Chen L Q 2019 MRS Bull. 44 520Google Scholar
[33] Zhang S, Wei S H 2002 Appl. Phys. Lett. 80 1376Google Scholar
[34] Berseneva N, Krasheninnikov A V, Nieminen R M 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 035501Google Scholar
[35] Wang D, Han D, Li X B, Xie S Y, Chen N K, Tian W Q, West D, Sun H B, Zhang S B 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 196801Google Scholar
[36] Freysoldt C, Neugebauer J, Van de Walle C G 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 016402Google Scholar
[37] Zhu G J, Yang J H, Gong X G 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 035202Google Scholar
[38] Wang D, Han D, Li X B, Chen N K, West D, Meunier V, Zhang S, Sun H B 2017 Phys. Rev. B 96 155424Google Scholar
[39] Xiao J, Yang K, Guo D, Shen T, Deng H X, Li S S, Luo J W, Wei S H 2020 Phys. Rev. B 101 165306Google Scholar
[40] Rijal B, Tan A M Z, Freysoldt C, Hennig R G 2021 Phys. Rev. Mater. 5 124004Google Scholar
[41] Tian Z, Zhao M X, Xue X X, Xia W, Guo C L, Guo Y F, Feng Y X, Xue J M 2018 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 12831Google Scholar
[42] Komsa H P, Pasquarello A 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 095505Google Scholar
[43] Komsa H P, Krasheninnikov A V 2015 Phys. Rev. B 91 125304Google Scholar
[44] Zhang S, Wang C G, Li M Y, Huang D, Li L J, Ji W, Wu S 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 046101Google Scholar
[45] Buckeridge J, Jevdokimovs D, Catlow C, Sokol A 2016 Phys. Rev. B 94 180101Google Scholar
[46] Taylor F H, Buckeridge J, Catlow C R A 2016 Chem. Mater. 28 8210Google Scholar
-
图 3 富氮条件下不同带电(分别标记为q, 2q, –q, –2q)VMo形成能随晶胞扩大倍数(以扩大倍数倒数$ 1/\alpha $的形式呈现, $ \alpha =4, 6, 8 $)变化而改变的示意图, 蓝色柱状图表示FN校正之后的数据, 橘黄色点表示未加FN校正的原始数据点, 而橙色线段表示外推线性方程, 橙色虚线表示使用SVS方法合理外推之后的准确值, 紫线为中性缺陷能量
Fig. 3. The Formation energies of different charge states (denote as q, 2q, –q, –2q, respectively) in N-rich condition as a function of the expansion multiple of the unit cell (denote as the reciprocal of the enlargement factor 1/α; α = 4, 6, 8) for $ {{\mathrm{V}}}_{{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{o}}} $. Blue bars indicate the data after FN correction, while the orange circles mean data without FN correction. The orange lines represent the extrapolated functions and orange dotted lines represent results of SVS prediction, purple line is the neutral defect energy.
图 4 在(a)富氮和(b)贫氮情况下MoSi2N4不同本征缺陷的形成能随费米能级能量(相对于价带顶的值)变化的示意图, 电荷转变能级出现在各缺陷形成能折线转折处
Fig. 4. Formation energies of each intrinsic defect in MoSi2N4 as a function of Fermi energy relative to the valence band maximum (VBM), in (a) N rich and (b) N poor condition. The transition levels lie where the slopes of lines change.
图 5 电子(ne), 空穴(np)和缺陷浓度在(a)富氮和(b)贫氮环境热平衡条件下随着温度变化的情况以及固定硅空位缺陷(VSi)浓度为$ 6\times {10}^{19}~{\mathrm{c}}{{\mathrm{m}}}^{-3} $情况下在(c)富氮以及(d)贫氮环境下的变化情况
Fig. 5. Concentrations of electrons (ne), holes (np) and defects in MoSi2N4 as a function of temperature T in equilibrium condition in (a) N-rich (b) N-poor environments respectively and in the presence of a fixed concentration of $ {{\mathrm{V}}}_{{\mathrm{S}}{\mathrm{i}}}=6\times {10}^{19}~{\mathrm{c}}{{\mathrm{m}}}^{-3} $ in (c) N-rich and (d) N-poor environments.
图 6 在固定p型载流子浓度条件下, 在 (a)富氮情况和(b)贫氮情况下电子(ne), 空穴(np)和缺陷浓度随着温度变化的情况; 在固定n型载流子浓度的条件下, (c)富氮情况和(d)贫氮情况下电子, 空穴和缺陷浓度随着温度变化的情况
Fig. 6. Concentrations of electron (ne) and hole (np) carriers and defects as a function of temperature T calculated in the presence of a fixed concentration of p carriers in (a) N-rich and (b) N-poor environments and in the presence of a fixed concentration of n carriers in (c) N-rich and (d) N-poor environments.
表 1 由VASP计算所得MoSi2N4相应的参数, 包括沿着x, y, z方向的晶格参数a, b, c及两种不同的Si—N键d12, d3的键长(Å); 带隙Eg及自旋轨道耦合分离能$ {{\Delta }}{Q}_{12} $(eV)
Table 1. The related parameters of MoSi2N4 calculated by VASP, including the lattice parameters along x, y, z direction a, b, c and two different Si—N bond lengths d12, d3 (Å); the bandgap Eg and the spin-orbit split-off energy $ {{\Delta }}{Q}_{12} $(eV).
a, b/Å d1,2/Å d3/Å c/Å $ {\Delta }{\boldsymbol{Q}}_{1, 2}/\mathbf{e}\mathbf{V} $ Eg/eV VBM/CBM Calculation 2.90 1.75 2.08 20.01 0.163 2.17 $ \varGamma /K $ Ref. [30] 2.909 — — 20.00 0.172 2.298 $ \varGamma /K $ -
[1] Hong Y L, Liu Z B, Wang L, Zhou T Y, Ma W, Xu C, Feng S, Chen L, Chen M L, Sun D M, Chen X Q, Cheng H M, Ren W C 2020 Science 369 670Google Scholar
[2] Sun X T, Song Z G, Huo N N, Liu S Q, Yang C, Yang J, Wang W Z, Lu J 2021 J. Mater. Chem. C 9 14683Google Scholar
[3] Huang J, Li P, Ren X, Guo Z X 2021 Phys. Rev. Appl. 16 044022Google Scholar
[4] Nandan K, Ghosh B, Agarwal A, Bhowmick S, Chauhan Y S 2021 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 69 406Google Scholar
[5] Liu Y B, Zhang T, Dou K Y, Du W H, Peng R, Dai Y, Huang B B, Ma Y D 2021 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12 8341Google Scholar
[6] Chi Y H, Chen Z N, Ma H, Yuan S F, Hao C L, Ren H, Zhao W, Zhu H Y, Ling C C, Guo W Y 2023 Appl. Catal. A 650 118975Google Scholar
[7] Xiao C W, Ma Z J, Sa R J, Cui Z T, Gao S S, Du W, Sun X Q, Li Q H 2022 ACS Omega 7 8706Google Scholar
[8] Xiao C W, Sa R J, Cui Z T, Gao S S, Du W, Sun X Q, Zhang X T, Li Q H, Ma Z J 2021 Appl. Surf. Sci. 563 150388Google Scholar
[9] Bafekry A, Faraji M, Fadlallah M, Ziabari A A, Khatibani A B, Feghhi S, Ghergherehchi M, Gogova D 2021 Appl. Surf. Sci. 564 150326Google Scholar
[10] Bafekry A, Faraji M, Fadlallah M M, Khatibani A B, Ziabari A A, Ghergherehchi M, Nedaei S, Shayesteh S F, Gogova D 2021 Appl. Surf. Sci. 559 149862Google Scholar
[11] Ma H, Zhao W, Zhang Q, Liu D Y, Ren H, Zhu H Y, Chi Y H, Ding F, Guo W Y 2022 Appl. Surf. Sci. 592 153214Google Scholar
[12] Hashibon A, Elsässer C 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 144117Google Scholar
[13] Janotti A, Van de Walle C G 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76 165202Google Scholar
[14] Yang C, Song Z G, Sun X T, Lu J 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 035308Google Scholar
[15] Xiong J, Di J, Xia J X, Zhu W S, Li H M 2018 Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 1801983Google Scholar
[16] Zheng Y J, Chen Y, Huang Y L, Gogoi P K, Li M Y, Li L J, Trevisanutto P E, Wang Q, Pennycook S J, Wee A T 2019 ACS Nano 13 6050Google Scholar
[17] Komsa H P, Berseneva N, Krasheninnikov A V, Nieminen R M 2018 Phys. Rev. X 8 031044Google Scholar
[18] Kresse G, Furthmuller J 1996 Comput. Mater. Sci 6 15Google Scholar
[19] Kresse G, Furthmuller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169Google Scholar
[20] Heyd J, Scuseria G E 2004 J. Chem. Phys. 121 1187Google Scholar
[21] Liu X F, Gao Z B, Wang V, Luo Z J, Lv B, Ding Z, Zhang Z F 2020 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 17055Google Scholar
[22] Freysoldt C, Neugebauer J 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 205425Google Scholar
[23] Li S, Thiering G, Udvarhelyi P, Ivády V, Gali A 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 1210Google Scholar
[24] Sopiha K V, Malyi O I, Persson C, Wu P 2021 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 33664Google Scholar
[25] Wang W, Strohbeen P J, Lee D, Zhou C, Kawasaki J K, Choi K S, Liu M, Galli G 2020 Chem. Mater. 32 2899Google Scholar
[26] Buckeridge J 2019 Comput. Phys. Commun. 244 329Google Scholar
[27] Buckeridge J, Veal T D, Catlow C R A, Scanlon D O 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 035207Google Scholar
[28] Bafekry A, Faraji M, Hoat D M, Shahrokhi M, Fadlallah M M, Shojaei F, Feghhi S A H, Ghergherehchi M, Gogova D 2021 J. Phys. s D Appl. Phys. 54 155303Google Scholar
[29] Yadav P, Khamari B, Singh B, Adarsh K, Agarwal A 2023 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 35 235701Google Scholar
[30] Li S, Wu W K, Feng X L, Guan S, Feng W X, Yao Y G, Yang S A 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 235435Google Scholar
[31] Brachman M K 1954 J. Chem. Phys. 22 1152Google Scholar
[32] Chen L Q 2019 MRS Bull. 44 520Google Scholar
[33] Zhang S, Wei S H 2002 Appl. Phys. Lett. 80 1376Google Scholar
[34] Berseneva N, Krasheninnikov A V, Nieminen R M 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 035501Google Scholar
[35] Wang D, Han D, Li X B, Xie S Y, Chen N K, Tian W Q, West D, Sun H B, Zhang S B 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 196801Google Scholar
[36] Freysoldt C, Neugebauer J, Van de Walle C G 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 016402Google Scholar
[37] Zhu G J, Yang J H, Gong X G 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 035202Google Scholar
[38] Wang D, Han D, Li X B, Chen N K, West D, Meunier V, Zhang S, Sun H B 2017 Phys. Rev. B 96 155424Google Scholar
[39] Xiao J, Yang K, Guo D, Shen T, Deng H X, Li S S, Luo J W, Wei S H 2020 Phys. Rev. B 101 165306Google Scholar
[40] Rijal B, Tan A M Z, Freysoldt C, Hennig R G 2021 Phys. Rev. Mater. 5 124004Google Scholar
[41] Tian Z, Zhao M X, Xue X X, Xia W, Guo C L, Guo Y F, Feng Y X, Xue J M 2018 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 12831Google Scholar
[42] Komsa H P, Pasquarello A 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 095505Google Scholar
[43] Komsa H P, Krasheninnikov A V 2015 Phys. Rev. B 91 125304Google Scholar
[44] Zhang S, Wang C G, Li M Y, Huang D, Li L J, Ji W, Wu S 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 046101Google Scholar
[45] Buckeridge J, Jevdokimovs D, Catlow C, Sokol A 2016 Phys. Rev. B 94 180101Google Scholar
[46] Taylor F H, Buckeridge J, Catlow C R A 2016 Chem. Mater. 28 8210Google Scholar
计量
- 文章访问数: 2719
- PDF下载量: 393
- 被引次数: 0