-
The nature of crystallization is considered to be one of the most fundamental research problems in condensed matter physics. With single particle resolution offered by video microscopy, colloidal suspensions provide a novel model system for studying crystallization, melting and other phase transitions, where the structures and dynamics of the particles during the transitions can be quantitatively probed. Traditional systems for studying the crystallization typically focus on the infinitely large systems in order to obtain the equilibrium state. However, studies of the crystallization in finite-sized systems such as crystallization in thin films and porous media, are rare despite the fact that they are the common phenomena in natural world. In this paper, we experimentally investigate the crystallization in a finite-sized colloidal system with attractive interactions. The colloidal suspension is composed of polystyrene microspheres dispersed in a mixture of water and 2, 6-lutidine, in which the interaction between the particles can be tuned by adjusting the temperature. We increase the temperature to 34 °C to induce attractions between the particles and thus producing a cluster, and then reduce the temperature to 33 °C to tune off the attractions. Thus we obtain a finite-sized liquid cluster of the colloidal particles. Crystallization is triggered by increasing the temperature to 34 °C. The crystallization process is recorded by video microscopy and the video data are analyzed by a standard particle tracking algorithm. Through the analysis of radial distribution function, Voronoi diagram, and local order parameter, we find that the crystallization of the finite colloidal system starts from the central dense region of the liquid cluster. This leads to a crystalline phase in the center and a liquid phase on the edge of the cluster. As time elapses, the central crystalline region grows while outer liquid region shrinks. The crystallization process exhibits a two-step scenario: a fast crystallization initially and a slow crystallization at the later stage. At the initial stage, the center of the system forms a dense metastable liquid phase, which lowers the free-energy barrier of crystallization and results in a fast crystallization. As the crystalline region grows, the metastable phase disappears, and thus the crystallization rate decreases. Moreover, a bimodal distribution of the orientational order parameter is observed during the crystallization in our finite-sized colloidal system, which is consistent with that in a large system. This indicates that the bimodal distribution is a common feature of the two-dimensional crystallization.
-
Keywords:
- colloids /
- crystallization /
- structure /
- phase transition
[1] Löwen H 1994 Phys. Rep. 237 249Google Scholar
[2] Kosterlitz J M, Thouless D J 1973 J. Phys. C 6 1181Google Scholar
[3] Nelson D R, Halperin B 1979 Phys. Rev. B 19 2457Google Scholar
[4] Young A 1979 Phys. Rev. B 19 1855Google Scholar
[5] Gasser U 2009 J. Phys.: Condes. Matter 21 203101Google Scholar
[6] Dinsmore A D, Crocker J C, Yodh A G 1998 Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 3 5Google Scholar
[7] Gast A P, Russel W B 1998 Phys. Today 51 24Google Scholar
[8] Pieranski P 1983 Contemp. Phys. 24 25Google Scholar
[9] Gasser U, Weeks E R, Schofield A, Pusey P, Weitz D 2001 Science 292 258Google Scholar
[10] Kegel W K, van Blaaderen A 2000 Science 287 290Google Scholar
[11] Wu Y L, Derks D, van Blaaderen A, Imhof A 2009 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 10564Google Scholar
[12] Hynninen A P, Thijssen J H, Vermolen E C, Dijkstra M, van Blaaderen A 2007 Nat. Mater. 6 202Google Scholar
[13] Wang Z, Alsayed A M, Yodh A G, Han Y 2010 J. Chem. Phys. 132 154501Google Scholar
[14] Wang Z, Qi W, Peng Y, Alsayed A M, Chen Y, Tong P, Han Y 2011 J. Chem. Phys. 134 034506Google Scholar
[15] Savage J, Blair D, Levine A, Guyer R, Dinsmore A 2006 Science 314 795Google Scholar
[16] Savage J, Dinsmore A 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 198302Google Scholar
[17] Moore L J, Dear R D, Summers M D, Dullens R P, Ritchie G A 2010 Nano Lett. 10 4266Google Scholar
[18] Tanaka S, Oki Y, Kimura Y 2014 Phys. Rev. E 89 052305Google Scholar
[19] Bonn D, Otwinowski J, Sacanna S, Guo H, Wegdam G, Schall P 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 156101Google Scholar
[20] Zhang Z, Yunker P J, Habdas P, Yodh A G 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 208303Google Scholar
[21] Xiao Y S, Yang L, Tian H Z, Yu Q M, Zhang Z X 2013 Langmuir 29 7216Google Scholar
[22] 王华光, 张泽新 2016 物理学报 65 219
Wang H G, Zhang Z Z 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 219
[23] Zhang Z, Xu N, Chen D T N, Yunker P, Alsayed A M, Aptowicz K B, Habdas P, Liu A J, Nagel S R, Yodh A G 2009 Nature 459 230Google Scholar
[24] Ten Wolde P R, Frenkel D 1997 Science 277 1975Google Scholar
[25] Zhang K, Liu X 2004 Nature 429 739Google Scholar
[26] Lutsko J F, Nicolis G 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 046102Google Scholar
[27] Han Y, Ha N, Alsayed A, Yodh A 2008 Phys. Rev. E 77 041406
-
-
[1] Löwen H 1994 Phys. Rep. 237 249Google Scholar
[2] Kosterlitz J M, Thouless D J 1973 J. Phys. C 6 1181Google Scholar
[3] Nelson D R, Halperin B 1979 Phys. Rev. B 19 2457Google Scholar
[4] Young A 1979 Phys. Rev. B 19 1855Google Scholar
[5] Gasser U 2009 J. Phys.: Condes. Matter 21 203101Google Scholar
[6] Dinsmore A D, Crocker J C, Yodh A G 1998 Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 3 5Google Scholar
[7] Gast A P, Russel W B 1998 Phys. Today 51 24Google Scholar
[8] Pieranski P 1983 Contemp. Phys. 24 25Google Scholar
[9] Gasser U, Weeks E R, Schofield A, Pusey P, Weitz D 2001 Science 292 258Google Scholar
[10] Kegel W K, van Blaaderen A 2000 Science 287 290Google Scholar
[11] Wu Y L, Derks D, van Blaaderen A, Imhof A 2009 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 10564Google Scholar
[12] Hynninen A P, Thijssen J H, Vermolen E C, Dijkstra M, van Blaaderen A 2007 Nat. Mater. 6 202Google Scholar
[13] Wang Z, Alsayed A M, Yodh A G, Han Y 2010 J. Chem. Phys. 132 154501Google Scholar
[14] Wang Z, Qi W, Peng Y, Alsayed A M, Chen Y, Tong P, Han Y 2011 J. Chem. Phys. 134 034506Google Scholar
[15] Savage J, Blair D, Levine A, Guyer R, Dinsmore A 2006 Science 314 795Google Scholar
[16] Savage J, Dinsmore A 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 198302Google Scholar
[17] Moore L J, Dear R D, Summers M D, Dullens R P, Ritchie G A 2010 Nano Lett. 10 4266Google Scholar
[18] Tanaka S, Oki Y, Kimura Y 2014 Phys. Rev. E 89 052305Google Scholar
[19] Bonn D, Otwinowski J, Sacanna S, Guo H, Wegdam G, Schall P 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 156101Google Scholar
[20] Zhang Z, Yunker P J, Habdas P, Yodh A G 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 208303Google Scholar
[21] Xiao Y S, Yang L, Tian H Z, Yu Q M, Zhang Z X 2013 Langmuir 29 7216Google Scholar
[22] 王华光, 张泽新 2016 物理学报 65 219
Wang H G, Zhang Z Z 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 219
[23] Zhang Z, Xu N, Chen D T N, Yunker P, Alsayed A M, Aptowicz K B, Habdas P, Liu A J, Nagel S R, Yodh A G 2009 Nature 459 230Google Scholar
[24] Ten Wolde P R, Frenkel D 1997 Science 277 1975Google Scholar
[25] Zhang K, Liu X 2004 Nature 429 739Google Scholar
[26] Lutsko J F, Nicolis G 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 046102Google Scholar
[27] Han Y, Ha N, Alsayed A, Yodh A 2008 Phys. Rev. E 77 041406
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 7483
- PDF Downloads: 88
- Cited By: 0