-
In this paper, the application of Muller-Plathe method and Jund method in reverse nonequilibrium molecular dynamics to the heat conduction of one-dimensional nanotubes are tested and studied. The results show that the Jund method cannot obtain a good linear temperature gradient and its thermal conductivity is also dependent on the choice of heat flux. When the exchange frequency is 50, the thermal conductivity obtained by the Muller-Plathe method converges to a stable value. This method can be well applied to the study of thermal conductivity of nanotubes. The Muller-Plathe method is a good option when the number of atoms exchanged is 1 and the exchange frequency is 100. On this basis, we further investigate the effect of length, diameter and temperature of carbon nanotubes and silicon carbide nanotubes on the thermal conductivity. The thermal conductivity of carbon nanotubes is obviously higher than that of silicon carbide nanotubes, and their effects of length, diameter and temperature on the thermal conductivity are consistent. The thermal conductivity of nanotubes increases with the rise of temperature, but the increase rate decreases and the length dependence also weakens. Therefore, when carbon nanotubes and silicon carbide nanotubes reach certain lengths, their values of thermal conductivity will converge and no longer change with length, which is completely consistent with the results of previous studies. Comparing with carbon nanotubes, the convergence rate of thermal conductivity of SiC nanotubes is significantly lower. When the temperature is low, the diameter has a certain effect on the thermal conductivity; however, with the increase of temperature, the diameter has almost no effect on the thermal conductivity at high temperature. The effect of temperature on the thermal conductivity of nanotubes shows that the thermal conductivity of nanotubes generally decreases with the rise of temperature, but the occurrence of the peak phenomenon is also affected by the length of nanotubes. When the length of carbon nanotubes is 10 nm, the influence of temperature and diameter on the thermal conductivity are irregular. However, when the length of carbon nanotubes is 100 nm, the thermal conductivity of carbon nanotubes decreases continuously with the rise of temperature, and there occurs no peak phenomenon. Besides, when the tube length is 10 nm, the peak of SiC nanotubes appears at about 100 K. However, when the tube length is 100 nm, the thermal conductivity of SiC nanotubes decreases with the rise of temperature, but no peak phenomenon occurs.
-
Keywords:
- reverse nonequilibrium molecular dynamics /
- heat conduction /
- carbon nanotubes /
- silicon carbide nanotubes
[1] Ouyang Y L, Zhang Z W, Li D F, Chen J, Zhang G 2019 Ann. Phys. 531 1800437Google Scholar
[2] Zhang Z, Ouyang Y, Cheng Y, Chen J, Li N, Zhang G 2020 Phys. Rep. 860 1Google Scholar
[3] Ren W, Ouyang Y, Jiang P, Yu C, He J, Chen J 2021 Nano Lett. 21 2634Google Scholar
[4] Yang N, Xu X, Zhang G, Li B 2012 AIP Adv. 2 041410Google Scholar
[5] Zhang R, Lee S, Law C K, Li W K, Teo B K 2002 Chem. Phys. Lett. 364 251Google Scholar
[6] Durgun E, Tongay S, Ciraci S 2005 Phys. Rev. B 72 075420Google Scholar
[7] He T, Zhao M, Li W, Lin X, Zhang X, Liu X, Xia Y, Mei L 2008 Nanotechnology 19 205707Google Scholar
[8] Menon M, Richter E, Mavrandonakis A, Froudakis G, Andriotis A N 2004 Phys. Rev. B 69 115322Google Scholar
[9] Balandin A A 2011 Nat. Mater. 10 569Google Scholar
[10] Berber S, Kwon Y K, Tomanek D 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 4613Google Scholar
[11] Padgett C W, Brenner D W 2004 Nano Lett. 4 1051Google Scholar
[12] Donadio D, Galli G 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 255502Google Scholar
[13] Moreland J F 2004 Microscale Thermophys. Eng. 8 61Google Scholar
[14] Lukes J R, Zhong H 2007 J. Heat Transfer 129 705Google Scholar
[15] Zhang G, Li B 2005 J. Chem. Phys. 123 114714Google Scholar
[16] Maruyama S 2002 Phys. B 323 193Google Scholar
[17] Mingo N, Broido D A 2005 Nano Lett. 5 1221Google Scholar
[18] Shiomi J, Maruyama S 2007 Thermal Engineering Summer Heat Transfer Conference Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, July 8–12, 2007 p381
[19] Wang J, Wang J S 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 111909Google Scholar
[20] Yao Z, Wang J S, Li B, Liu G R 2005 Phys. Rev. B 71 085417Google Scholar
[21] 保文星, 朱长纯 2006 物理学报 55 3552Google Scholar
Bao W X, Zhu C C 2006 Acta Phys. Sin. 55 3552Google Scholar
[22] 侯泉文, 曹炳阳, 过增元 2009 物理学报 58 7809Google Scholar
Hou Q W, Cao B Y, Guo Z Y 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 7809Google Scholar
[23] 王照亮, 梁金国, 唐大伟 2008 物理学报 57 3391Google Scholar
Wang Z L, Liang J G, Tang D W 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 3391Google Scholar
[24] Osman M A, Srivastava D 2001 Nanotechnology 12 21Google Scholar
[25] Cao J X, Yan X H, Xiao Y, Ding J W 2004 Phys. Rev. B 69 073407Google Scholar
[26] Maruyama S 2003 Microscale Thermophys. Eng. 7 41Google Scholar
[27] Che J, Cagin T, Goddard III W A 2000 Nanotechnology 11 65Google Scholar
[28] Bai D 2011 Fullerenes, Nanotubes, Carbon Nanostruct 19 271Google Scholar
[29] Lyver J W, Blaisten-Barojas E 2011 J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 8 529Google Scholar
[30] Shen H 2009 Comput. Mater. Sci. 47 220Google Scholar
[31] Mingo N, Broido D A 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 096105Google Scholar
[32] Chen J, Zhang G, Li B W 2010 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 79 074604Google Scholar
[33] Müller-Plathe F 1997 J. Chem. Phys. 106 6082Google Scholar
[34] Jund P, Jullien R 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 13707Google Scholar
[35] Nieto-Draghi C, Avalos J B 2009 Mol. Phys. 101 2303
[36] Zhang M, Lussetti E, de Souza L E, Muller-Plathe F 2005 J. Phys. Chem. B 109 15060Google Scholar
[37] Plimpton S 1995 J. Comput. Phys. 117 1Google Scholar
[38] Tersoff J 1989 Phys. Rev. B 39 5566Google Scholar
[39] Schelling P K, Phillpot S R, Keblinski P 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 144306Google Scholar
[40] Sellan D P, Landry E S, Turney J E, McGaughey A J H, Amon C H 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 214305Google Scholar
[41] Zhang W, Zhu Z, Wang F, Wang T, Sun L, Wang Z 2004 Nanotechnology 15 936Google Scholar
-
表 1 Müller-Plath法得到的热流和热导率(*代表温度梯度线性程度十分糟糕; 6, 20, 50是纳米管的长度(单位: nm))
Table 1. Heat flux and thermal conductivity obtained by Muller-Plath method. * represents a very poor linearity of the temperature gradient. 6, 20, 50 is the length of the nanotube (unit: nm).
频率 碳纳米管 碳化硅纳米管 热流/(eV·ps–1) 热导率/(W·m–1·K–1) 热流/(eV·ps–1) 热导率/(W·m–1·K–1) 6 20 50 6 20 50 6 20 50 6 20 50 1 24.0 * 36.4 74.3 * 417.1 8.8 8.7 17.2 15.8 29.6 113.7 50 4.2 5.40 5.4 33.7 83.5 162.0 3.2 3.7 3.8 8.4 20.6 36.1 100 2.2 2.90 3.0 32.8 81.4 159.0 1.8 2.2 2.3 7.6 19.6 34.1 150 1.5 1.99 2.1 33.0 79.2 158.0 1.3 1.5 1.7 7.3 18.7 33.1 200 1.1 1.50 1.6 29.4 76.4 145.1 1.0 1.2 1.3 7.3 18.3 33.6 300 0.8 1.00 1.0 31.4 84.5 159.3 0.7 0.8 1.0 7.7 18.2 32.6 400 * 0.80 0.9 * 74.0 160.5 0.5 0.7 0.7 7.1 16.8 32.7 500 * 0.60 * * 68.9 * 0.4 0.5 0.6 7.1 16.8 31.2 700 * 0.40 0.5 * 63.5 97.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 6.5 16.1 32.4 1000 * 0.30 * * 67.3 * * 0.3 0.3 * 17.2 34.2 表 2 Jund法得到的热导率. *代表温度梯度线性程度十分糟糕; —代表体系崩溃. 1—9代表了在冷区和热区抽取和注入的热流(单位: eV/ps)
Table 2. Thermal conductivity obtained by Jund method. * represents a very poor linearity of temperature gradient; – represents the system collapse. 1–9 represents the heat flow (unit: eV/ps) extracted and injected in cold and hot regions.
模型 长度/nm 热流/(eV·ps–1) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 碳纳米管 60 31.40 31.66 * — — — — — — 200 77.07 32.80 * 46.26 * * * * * 500 184.46 181.25 * * * * 270.25 * * 碳化硅纳米管 60 6.90 5.41 6.87 7.98 8.52 — — — — 200 16.96 10.98 * 22.03 23.53 24.21 25.02 — — 500 30.23 33.22 34.19 31.27 35.79 37.89 39.62 44.21 44.21 -
[1] Ouyang Y L, Zhang Z W, Li D F, Chen J, Zhang G 2019 Ann. Phys. 531 1800437Google Scholar
[2] Zhang Z, Ouyang Y, Cheng Y, Chen J, Li N, Zhang G 2020 Phys. Rep. 860 1Google Scholar
[3] Ren W, Ouyang Y, Jiang P, Yu C, He J, Chen J 2021 Nano Lett. 21 2634Google Scholar
[4] Yang N, Xu X, Zhang G, Li B 2012 AIP Adv. 2 041410Google Scholar
[5] Zhang R, Lee S, Law C K, Li W K, Teo B K 2002 Chem. Phys. Lett. 364 251Google Scholar
[6] Durgun E, Tongay S, Ciraci S 2005 Phys. Rev. B 72 075420Google Scholar
[7] He T, Zhao M, Li W, Lin X, Zhang X, Liu X, Xia Y, Mei L 2008 Nanotechnology 19 205707Google Scholar
[8] Menon M, Richter E, Mavrandonakis A, Froudakis G, Andriotis A N 2004 Phys. Rev. B 69 115322Google Scholar
[9] Balandin A A 2011 Nat. Mater. 10 569Google Scholar
[10] Berber S, Kwon Y K, Tomanek D 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 4613Google Scholar
[11] Padgett C W, Brenner D W 2004 Nano Lett. 4 1051Google Scholar
[12] Donadio D, Galli G 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 255502Google Scholar
[13] Moreland J F 2004 Microscale Thermophys. Eng. 8 61Google Scholar
[14] Lukes J R, Zhong H 2007 J. Heat Transfer 129 705Google Scholar
[15] Zhang G, Li B 2005 J. Chem. Phys. 123 114714Google Scholar
[16] Maruyama S 2002 Phys. B 323 193Google Scholar
[17] Mingo N, Broido D A 2005 Nano Lett. 5 1221Google Scholar
[18] Shiomi J, Maruyama S 2007 Thermal Engineering Summer Heat Transfer Conference Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, July 8–12, 2007 p381
[19] Wang J, Wang J S 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 111909Google Scholar
[20] Yao Z, Wang J S, Li B, Liu G R 2005 Phys. Rev. B 71 085417Google Scholar
[21] 保文星, 朱长纯 2006 物理学报 55 3552Google Scholar
Bao W X, Zhu C C 2006 Acta Phys. Sin. 55 3552Google Scholar
[22] 侯泉文, 曹炳阳, 过增元 2009 物理学报 58 7809Google Scholar
Hou Q W, Cao B Y, Guo Z Y 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 7809Google Scholar
[23] 王照亮, 梁金国, 唐大伟 2008 物理学报 57 3391Google Scholar
Wang Z L, Liang J G, Tang D W 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 3391Google Scholar
[24] Osman M A, Srivastava D 2001 Nanotechnology 12 21Google Scholar
[25] Cao J X, Yan X H, Xiao Y, Ding J W 2004 Phys. Rev. B 69 073407Google Scholar
[26] Maruyama S 2003 Microscale Thermophys. Eng. 7 41Google Scholar
[27] Che J, Cagin T, Goddard III W A 2000 Nanotechnology 11 65Google Scholar
[28] Bai D 2011 Fullerenes, Nanotubes, Carbon Nanostruct 19 271Google Scholar
[29] Lyver J W, Blaisten-Barojas E 2011 J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 8 529Google Scholar
[30] Shen H 2009 Comput. Mater. Sci. 47 220Google Scholar
[31] Mingo N, Broido D A 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 096105Google Scholar
[32] Chen J, Zhang G, Li B W 2010 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 79 074604Google Scholar
[33] Müller-Plathe F 1997 J. Chem. Phys. 106 6082Google Scholar
[34] Jund P, Jullien R 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 13707Google Scholar
[35] Nieto-Draghi C, Avalos J B 2009 Mol. Phys. 101 2303
[36] Zhang M, Lussetti E, de Souza L E, Muller-Plathe F 2005 J. Phys. Chem. B 109 15060Google Scholar
[37] Plimpton S 1995 J. Comput. Phys. 117 1Google Scholar
[38] Tersoff J 1989 Phys. Rev. B 39 5566Google Scholar
[39] Schelling P K, Phillpot S R, Keblinski P 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 144306Google Scholar
[40] Sellan D P, Landry E S, Turney J E, McGaughey A J H, Amon C H 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 214305Google Scholar
[41] Zhang W, Zhu Z, Wang F, Wang T, Sun L, Wang Z 2004 Nanotechnology 15 936Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 6142
- PDF Downloads: 127
- Cited By: 0