-
Hydrogen permeation through vanadium/palladium (V/Pd) metal composite membranes is an effective and practical method of separating hydrogen from gas mixtures. In order to gain an insight into the relation between the interfacial structure and hydrogen adsorption/diffusion properties of the catalytic Pd layer bonded to the metal membrane, and then improve the ability of the alloy membrane to purify hydrogen, the first principle based on the density functional theory is used to study the hydrogen adsorption/diffusion behavior at the V/Pd metal composite membrane interface. The results show that because the charge density at the V/Pd interface increases with the V/Pd bonding increasing, the dissolution energy of hydrogen atom (H) increases with it approaching to the interface, and it has the highest dissolution energy near the V/Pd interface (0.567 eV). Hydrogen migration energy barrier calculations show that compared with the maximum energy barrier for horizontal diffusion of H along the V/Pd interface (0.64 eV), the H vertical V/Pd interface energy barrier (0.56 eV) is small, thus H tends to migrate vertically V/Pd interface and diffuse from the Pd layer to the V substrate side. As the hydrogen solvation energy of the Pd layer at the V/Pd interface (0.238 eV) is higher than that on the V membrane side (–0.165 eV), H will gather on the V film side of the interface, which is easy to cause hydrogen to be embrittled. Calculations of Pd/Fe doping of the V matrix show that comparing with the undoped energy barrier (0.56 eV), Pd/Fe doping can significantly reduce the maximum energy barrier (0.45 eV/0.54 eV) in the diffusion path of the interface, which is favorable for hydrogen permeation and diffusion. And the doped interface can inhibit the interdiffusion of V layer and catalytic Pd layer to a certain extent, which improves the structural stability of the composite film.
-
Keywords:
- V/Pd interface /
- first principle /
- hydrogen permeation characteristics /
- mechanical property
[1] Li Q, Garcia-Muelas R, Lopez N 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 526
Google Scholar
[2] Kim T, Song Y, Kang J, Kim S K, Kim S 2022 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 47 24817
Google Scholar
[3] Agnolin S, Melendez J, Di Felice L, Gallucci F 2022 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 47 28505
Google Scholar
[4] Park S B, Nam G H, Park Y I 2022 Thin Solid Films 757 139391
Google Scholar
[5] Dolan M D 2010 J. Membr. Sci. 362 12
Google Scholar
[6] Kozhakhmetov S, Sidorov N, Piven V, Sipatov I, Gabis I, Arinov B 2015 J. Alloys Compd. 645 S36
Google Scholar
[7] Dolan M D, Viano D M, Langley M J, Lamb K E 2018 J. Membr. Sci. 549 306
Google Scholar
[8] Zhang S, Zhang Z, Li J, Tu R, Shen Q, Wang C, Luo G, Zhang L 2020 J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. 35 879
Google Scholar
[9] Ko W S, Jeon J B, Shim J H, Lee B J 2012 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37 13583
Google Scholar
[10] Fasolin S, Barison S, Agresti F, Battiston S, Fiameni S, Isopi J, Armelao L 2022 Membranes (Basel, Switz.) 12 16
Google Scholar
[11] Alimov V N, Busnyuk A O, Notkin M E, Livshits A I 2014 J. Membr. Sci. 457 103
Google Scholar
[12] Dai J H, Xie R W, Chen Y Y, Song Y 2015 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17 16594
Google Scholar
[13] Il Jeon S, Park J H, Magnone E, Lee Y T, Fleury E 2012 Curr. Appl. Phys. 12 394
Google Scholar
[14] Ko W S, Oh J Y, Shim J H, Suh J Y, Yoon W Y, Lee B J 2014 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 39 12031
Google Scholar
[15] Qin J Y, Wang Z M, Wang D H, Wang F, Yan X F, Zhong Y, Hu C H, Zhou H Y 2019 J. Alloys Compd. 805 747
Google Scholar
[16] Qin J Y, Hao C Y, Wang D H, Wang F, Yan X F, Zhong Y, Wang Z M, Hu C H, Wang X T 2020 J. Adv. Res. 21 25
Google Scholar
[17] Mills G, Jonsson H, Schenter G K 1995 Surf. Sci. 324 305
Google Scholar
[18] Henkelman G, Jonsson H 2000 J. Chem. Phys. 113 9978
Google Scholar
[19] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865
Google Scholar
[20] Blochl P E 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 17953
Google Scholar
[21] Qin J Y, Liu Z G, Zhao W, Wang D A H, Zhang Y L, Zhong Y, Zhang X H, Wang Z M, Hu C H, Liu J W 2021 Materials 14 12
Google Scholar
[22] Mills G, Schenter G K, Makarov D E, Jonsson H 1997 Chem. Phys. Lett. 278 91
Google Scholar
[23] Mills G, Jonsson H 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 1124
Google Scholar
[24] Chen J F, Hu L, Tang T 2022 J. Phys. Chem. C 126 7468
Google Scholar
[25] Castleton C W M, Hoglund A, Gothelid M, Qian M C, Mirbt S 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 7
Google Scholar
[26] Zhang H L, Wang J J, Huang W J, Wang L Q, Lu Z B 2022 Surf. Interfaces 30 10
Google Scholar
[27] Rose J H, Ferrante J, Smith J R 1981 Phys. Rev. Lett. 47 675
Google Scholar
[28] Jin N, Yang Y Q, Li J, Luo X, Huang B, Sun Q, Guo P F 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 115 11
Google Scholar
[29] Lu T, Chen Q X 2018 Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 34 503
Google Scholar
[30] Wang J W, Song M, He Y H, Gong H R 2016 J. Membr. Sci. 503 124
Google Scholar
[31] Kang S G, Coulter K E, Gade S K, Way J D, Sholl D S 2011 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2 3040
Google Scholar
[32] Yang L, Wirth B D 2020 J. Appl. Phys. 127 12
Google Scholar
[33] Puska M J, Nieminen R M, Manninen M 1981 Phys. Rev. B 24 3037
Google Scholar
[34] Ko W S, Shim J H, Jung W S, Lee B J 2016 J. Membr. Sci. 497 270
Google Scholar
-
图 1 V(110)面与Pd(111)面的6种组合模型(Pd原子为银白色, V原子为红色) (a) AA'; (b) AB'; (c) AC'; (d) BA'; (e) BB'; (f) BC'
Figure 1. Six combined models of V(110) plane and Pd(111) plane (Pd atoms are silvery white and V atoms are red): (a) AA'; (b) AB'; (c) AC'; (d) BA'; (e) BB'; (f) BC'.
图 2 V(110)/Pd(111)界面的理想黏附功随着V和Pd原子层之间的分离的变化
Figure 2. Change of ideal adhesion work of V(110)/Pd(111) interface with the separation between V and Pd layers.
图 3 V/Pd界面模型和相应的局域态密度
Figure 3. V/Pd interface model and the corresponding local density of states.
图 4 V/Pd界面电子局域化函数图
Figure 4. Electronic localization function diagram of V/Pd interface.
图 5 (a) V/Pd界面模型, 其中方块表示Ｈ原子溶解的间隙位; (b) 四面体位置; (c)八面体位置; (d) 伪八面体位置
Figure 5. (a) V/Pd interface model, where the square represents the interstitial position of H atom dissolution; (b) tetrahedron position; (c) octahedron position; (d) pseudo octahedron position.
图 6 界面中不同位置上的氢溶解能
Figure 6. Hydrogen dissolution energy at different positions in the interface.
图 7 H垂直通过V/Pd界面的迁移能量
Figure 7. Migration energy of H passing through V/Pd interface vertically.
图 8 水平通过V/Pd界面的迁移能量
Figure 8. Migration energy through V/Pd interface horizontally.
图 9 V/Pd界面的电荷密度 (a) 没有H原子的界面电荷密度图; (b)—(d) 分别为H原子在图5(a)中1, 7, 9位置的电荷密度图
Figure 9. Charge density at V/Pd interface: (a) Interface charge density map without H atom; (b)–(d) the charge density maps of H atoms at positions 1, 7, and 9 in Fig. 5 (a), respectively.
图 10 (a) H在Pd掺杂界面的垂直扩散; (b) H在Fe掺杂界面的垂直扩散; (c) H垂直通过掺杂界面的迁移能量
Figure 10. (a) Vertical diffusion of H at the Pd doping interface; (b) vertical diffusion of H at the Fe doping interface; (c) migration energy of H through the doping interface vertically.
图 11 (a) Pd向V空位的扩散; (b) Pd向Pd掺杂界面中V空位的扩散; (c) Pd向Fe掺杂界面中V空位的扩散; (d) Pd向V空位的扩散能垒
Figure 11. (a) Diffusion of Pd to V vacancy; (b) diffusion of Pd to V vacancy in Pd doped interface; (c) diffusion of Pd to V vacancy in Fe doped interface; (d) diffusion energy barrier of Pd to V vacancy.
图 12 (a) H在Pd掺杂界面S4位置的电子局域函数图; (b) H在Fe掺杂界面S4位置的电子局域函数图; (c) Pd在Pd掺杂V基体空位的电荷密度图; (d) Pd在Fe掺杂V基体空位的电荷密度图
Figure 12. (a) Electronic local function diagram of H at S4 position of Pd doping interface; (b) electronic local function diagram of H at S4 position of Fe doping interface; (c) charge density diagram of Pd in Pd-doped V matrix vacancies; (d) charge density diagram of Pd in Fe-doped V matrix vacancies.
图 13 (a) 界面拉应力随应变的变化; (b) V(110)面与Pd(111)面的拉应力随应变的变化
Figure 13. (a) Change of interface tensile stress with strain; (b) change of tensile stress with strain on V(110) plane and Pd(111) plane.
表 1 不同厚度的V(110)面表面能
Table 1. Surface energy of V(110) surface with different thickness.
Number of atomic
layers of V (Pd)Surface energy/(J·m–2) V(110) Pd(111) 2(3) 2.42 1.434 4(6) 2.36 1.363 6(9) 2.37 1.361 8(12) 2.35 1.362 10(15) 2.34 1.361 
DownLoad: CSV
-
[1] Li Q, Garcia-Muelas R, Lopez N 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 526
Google Scholar
[2] Kim T, Song Y, Kang J, Kim S K, Kim S 2022 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 47 24817
Google Scholar
[3] Agnolin S, Melendez J, Di Felice L, Gallucci F 2022 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 47 28505
Google Scholar
[4] Park S B, Nam G H, Park Y I 2022 Thin Solid Films 757 139391
Google Scholar
[5] Dolan M D 2010 J. Membr. Sci. 362 12
Google Scholar
[6] Kozhakhmetov S, Sidorov N, Piven V, Sipatov I, Gabis I, Arinov B 2015 J. Alloys Compd. 645 S36
Google Scholar
[7] Dolan M D, Viano D M, Langley M J, Lamb K E 2018 J. Membr. Sci. 549 306
Google Scholar
[8] Zhang S, Zhang Z, Li J, Tu R, Shen Q, Wang C, Luo G, Zhang L 2020 J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. 35 879
Google Scholar
[9] Ko W S, Jeon J B, Shim J H, Lee B J 2012 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37 13583
Google Scholar
[10] Fasolin S, Barison S, Agresti F, Battiston S, Fiameni S, Isopi J, Armelao L 2022 Membranes (Basel, Switz.) 12 16
Google Scholar
[11] Alimov V N, Busnyuk A O, Notkin M E, Livshits A I 2014 J. Membr. Sci. 457 103
Google Scholar
[12] Dai J H, Xie R W, Chen Y Y, Song Y 2015 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17 16594
Google Scholar
[13] Il Jeon S, Park J H, Magnone E, Lee Y T, Fleury E 2012 Curr. Appl. Phys. 12 394
Google Scholar
[14] Ko W S, Oh J Y, Shim J H, Suh J Y, Yoon W Y, Lee B J 2014 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 39 12031
Google Scholar
[15] Qin J Y, Wang Z M, Wang D H, Wang F, Yan X F, Zhong Y, Hu C H, Zhou H Y 2019 J. Alloys Compd. 805 747
Google Scholar
[16] Qin J Y, Hao C Y, Wang D H, Wang F, Yan X F, Zhong Y, Wang Z M, Hu C H, Wang X T 2020 J. Adv. Res. 21 25
Google Scholar
[17] Mills G, Jonsson H, Schenter G K 1995 Surf. Sci. 324 305
Google Scholar
[18] Henkelman G, Jonsson H 2000 J. Chem. Phys. 113 9978
Google Scholar
[19] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865
Google Scholar
[20] Blochl P E 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 17953
Google Scholar
[21] Qin J Y, Liu Z G, Zhao W, Wang D A H, Zhang Y L, Zhong Y, Zhang X H, Wang Z M, Hu C H, Liu J W 2021 Materials 14 12
Google Scholar
[22] Mills G, Schenter G K, Makarov D E, Jonsson H 1997 Chem. Phys. Lett. 278 91
Google Scholar
[23] Mills G, Jonsson H 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 1124
Google Scholar
[24] Chen J F, Hu L, Tang T 2022 J. Phys. Chem. C 126 7468
Google Scholar
[25] Castleton C W M, Hoglund A, Gothelid M, Qian M C, Mirbt S 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 7
Google Scholar
[26] Zhang H L, Wang J J, Huang W J, Wang L Q, Lu Z B 2022 Surf. Interfaces 30 10
Google Scholar
[27] Rose J H, Ferrante J, Smith J R 1981 Phys. Rev. Lett. 47 675
Google Scholar
[28] Jin N, Yang Y Q, Li J, Luo X, Huang B, Sun Q, Guo P F 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 115 11
Google Scholar
[29] Lu T, Chen Q X 2018 Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 34 503
Google Scholar
[30] Wang J W, Song M, He Y H, Gong H R 2016 J. Membr. Sci. 503 124
Google Scholar
[31] Kang S G, Coulter K E, Gade S K, Way J D, Sholl D S 2011 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2 3040
Google Scholar
[32] Yang L, Wirth B D 2020 J. Appl. Phys. 127 12
Google Scholar
[33] Puska M J, Nieminen R M, Manninen M 1981 Phys. Rev. B 24 3037
Google Scholar
[34] Ko W S, Shim J H, Jung W S, Lee B J 2016 J. Membr. Sci. 497 270
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 2758
- PDF Downloads: 70
- Cited By: 0
