-
With the continuous upgrading of hypersonic vehicles, a new requirement for designing imaging window i.e. conformal window for improving aerodynamic characteristics, is put forward, in which the supersonic cooling film and optical window are required to maintain the same curvature shape as the aircraft body. In this work, the mixed-layer flow evolution on a convex wall (CV) is investigated. A nanoparticle-based planar laser scattering technique is used to design the flow field structure of the mixed layer in Ma = 6 hypersonic static wind tunnel, and the location of the mixed-layer instability is studied by combing fractal dimension. The results of pressure, and impulse of compression (Ip) evolution along the flow direction are obtained by numerical simulation, showing that the total incoming pressure (P0) has a significant effect on the flow evolution of the mixed layer: as P0 increases, the ratio of static pressure (RSP) decreases, that the position of the mixed-layer instability is delayed, and that the flow velocity of the typical vortex structure increases. The favorable gradient existing at the CV wallleads the pressure to drop along the flow direction, and the pressure is enhanced when the supersonic air film along the tangential direction of the wall is under the operating condition. However, as P0 increases, the RSP decreases, and the lifting effect of the pressure on the CV decreases. The flow field is affected by the expansion effect of the CV, and Ip decreases along the flow direction. The supersonic air film can weaken the expansion effect on the CV and thus suppressing the decrease of Ip. The change rate of Ip (ΔIp) is significantly affected by P0, in a range of bending impulse |IΦ| = 0.191–3.62, ΔIp decreases from 178.67% to 12.02% when P0 = 0.5 MPa, and ΔIp decreases from 40.38% to 5.64% when P0 = 1.0 MPa. ΔIp decreases as |IΦ| increases, but the decrease becomes less as P0 increases. The results reveal the flow evolution law of hypersonic mixed layer under the influence of convex curvature, and provide a certain reference for designing the shape of hypersonic vehicle to achieve aerodynamic drag reduction and thermal protection characteristics.
-
Keywords:
- hypersonic /
- mixed layer /
- fractal dimension /
- impulse of compression
[1] Ko S Y, Xu J Z, Yao Y Q, Tsou F K 1984 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 27 1551
Google Scholar
[2] Gibson M M, Verriopoulos C A 1984 Exp. Fluids 2 73
Google Scholar
[3] Humble R A, Peltier S J, Bowersox R D W 2012 Phys. Fluids 24 106103
Google Scholar
[4] Mayle R E, Kopper F C, Blair M F, Bailey D A 1977 J. Eng. Power 99 77
Google Scholar
[5] Wang Q C, Wang Z G, Zhao Y X 2017 Phys. Fluids 29 116106
Google Scholar
[6] Thara-Reshma I V, Vinoth P, Rajesh G, Ben-Dor G 2021 J. Fluid Mech. 924 A37
Google Scholar
[7] Kokkinakis I W, Drikakis D, Spottswood S M, Brouwer K R, Riley Z B 2023 Phys. Fluids 35 106109
Google Scholar
[8] Zhang T, Pu J, Zhou W L, Wang J H, Wu W L, Chen Y 2021 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 175 121384
Google Scholar
[9] Pu J, Zhang T, Wang J H 2022 Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer 130 105834
Google Scholar
[10] Su C H 2019 AIAA J 57 2840
Google Scholar
[11] Zhao X H, Yi S H, Mi Q, Ding H L, He L 2022 AIAA J. 60 1262
Google Scholar
[12] Sun X B, Ding H L, Liu M X, Yi S H, Zhao Y X 2023 Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 140 108488
Google Scholar
[13] Lin J X, Wang Q C, Zhao Y X, Lu X G 2023 Phys. Fluids 35 056107
Google Scholar
[14] Marquardt P, Klaas M, Schröder W 2020 Exp. Fluids 61 160
Google Scholar
[15] Sun X K, Ni H, Peng W, Jiang P X, Zhu Y H 2021 Chin. J. Aeronaut. 34 452
Google Scholar
[16] Ifti H S, Hermann T, Ewenz Rocher M, Doherty L, Hambidge C, McGilvray M, Vandeperre L 2022 Exp. Fluids 63 102
Google Scholar
[17] Singh K, Udayraj 2022 Appl. Therm. Eng. 208 118224
Google Scholar
[18] Qin Y M, Li X Y, Ren J, Jiang H D 2015 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 86 482
Google Scholar
[19] Peter J M F, Kloker M J 2022 Phys. Fluids 34 025125
Google Scholar
[20] Zhao X H, Yi S H, Mi Q, Ding H L, Niu H B 2022 Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 123 107457
Google Scholar
[21] Zhao Y X, Yi S H, Tian L F, Cheng Z 2009 Sci. China, Ser. E: Technol. Sci. 52 3640
Google Scholar
[22] 郑文鹏, 易仕和, 牛海波, 霍俊杰 2021 物理学报 70 244702
Google Scholar
Zheng W P, Yi S H, Niu H B, Huo J J 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 244702
Google Scholar
[23] 牛海波, 易仕和, 刘小林, 霍俊杰, 冈敦殿 2021 物理学报 70 134701
Google Scholar
Niu H B, Yi S H, Liu X L, Huo J J, Gang D D 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 134701
Google Scholar
[24] 刘小林, 易仕和, 牛海波, 陆小革 2018 物理学报 67 214701
Google Scholar
Liu X L, Yi S H, Niu H B, Lu X G 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 214701
Google Scholar
[25] 刘小林, 易仕和, 牛海波, 陆小革, 赵鑫海 2018 物理学报 67 174701
Google Scholar
Liu X L, Yi S H, Niu H B, Lu X G, Zhao X H 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 174701
Google Scholar
[26] Tichenor N R, Humble R A, Bowersox R D W 2013 J. Fluid Mech. 722 187
Google Scholar
[27] Wang Q C, Wang Z G 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 114102
Google Scholar
[28] Zhang Z, Yi S, Liu X L, Hu Y F, Chen S K 2024 Phys. Fluids 36 036127
Google Scholar
[29] Bradshaw P 2006 J. Fluid Mech. 52 113
Google Scholar
[30] Bradshaw P 1974 J. Fluid Mech. 63 449
Google Scholar
-
图 1 高超声速静风洞
Figure 1. Hypersonic static wind tunnel.
图 2 实验模型示意图
Figure 2. Experimental model diagram.
图 3 超声速气膜喷管马赫数校准结果
Figure 3. Mach number calibration results for supersonic air-film nozzles.
图 4 不同P0下的流场NPLS图像 (a) 0.3 MPa; (b) 0.5 MPa; (c) 0.6 MPa; (d) 0.65 MPa; (e) 1.0 MPa
Figure 4. NPLS images of the flow field at different P0: (a) 0.3 MPa; (b) 0.5 MPa; (c) 0.6 MPa; (d) 0.65 MPa; (e) 1.0 MPa.
图 5 边缘检测结果 (a) P0 = 0.3 MPa; (b) P0 = 0.5 MPa; (c) P0 = 0.6 MPa; (d) P0 = 0.65 MPa; (e) P0 = 1.0 MPa
Figure 5. Edge detection result: (a) P0 = 0.3 MPa; (b) P0 = 0.5 MPa; (c) P0 = 0.6 MPa; (d) P0 = 0.65 MPa; (e) P0 = 1.0 MPa.
图 6 分形分析结果
Figure 6. Results of fractal analysis.
图 7 不同P0下时序间隔5 μs的NPLS结果 (a) P0 = 0.3 MPa, t1; (b) P0 = 0.3 MPa, t1+5 μs; (c) P0 = 0.5 MPa, t2; (d) P0 = 0.5 MPa, t2+5 μs; (e) P0 = 0.6 MPa, t3; (f) P0 = 0.6 MPa, t3+5 μs; (g) P0 = 0.65 MPa, t4; (h) P0 = 0.65 MPa, t4+5 μs; (i) P0 = 1.0 MPa, t5; (j) P0 = 1.0 MPa, t5+5 μs.
Figure 7. NPLS results for timing intervals of 5 μs at different P0: (a) P0 = 0.3 MPa, t1; (b) P0 = 0.3 MPa, t1+5 μs; (c) P0 = 0.5 MPa, t2; (d) P0 = 0.5 MPa, t2+5 μs; (e) P0 = 0.6 MPa, t3; (f) P0 = 0.6 MPa, t3+5 μs; (g) P0 = 0.65 MPa, t4; (h) P0 = 0.65 MPa, t4+5 μs; (i) P0 = 1.0 MPa, t5; (j) P0 = 1.0 MPa, t5+5 μs.
图 8 不同来流总压下超声速气膜对P/Pin的影响 (a) P0 = 0.3 MPa; (b) P0 = 0.5 MPa; (c) P0 = 0.6 MPa; (d) P0 = 0.65 MPa; (e) P0 = 1.0 MPa; (f) 不同P0下, Pj = 10 kPa
Figure 8. Effect of supersonic air film on P/Pin at different incoming total pressures: (a) P0 = 0.3 MPa; (b) P0 = 0.5 MPa; (c) P0 = 0.6 MPa; (d) P0 = 0.65 MPa; (e) P0 = 1.0 MPa; (f) Pj = 10 kPa with different P0.
图 9 不同来流总压下超声速气膜对Ip的影响 (a) P0 = 0.3 MPa; (b) P0 = 0.5 MPa; (c) P0 = 0.6 MPa; (d) P0 = 0.65 MPa; (e) P0 = 1.0 MPa; (f)不同P0下, Pj = 10 kPa
Figure 9. Effect of supersonic air film on Ip at different incoming total pressures: (a) P0 = 0.3 MPa; (b) P0 = 0.5 MPa; (c) P0 = 0.6 MPa; (d) P0 = 0.65 MPa; (e) P0 = 1.0 MPa; (f) Pj = 10 kPa with different P0.
图 10 不同P0下超声速气膜对Ip的增长作用
Figure 10. Effect of supersonic air film on the growth of Ip at different P0.
-
[1] Ko S Y, Xu J Z, Yao Y Q, Tsou F K 1984 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 27 1551
Google Scholar
[2] Gibson M M, Verriopoulos C A 1984 Exp. Fluids 2 73
Google Scholar
[3] Humble R A, Peltier S J, Bowersox R D W 2012 Phys. Fluids 24 106103
Google Scholar
[4] Mayle R E, Kopper F C, Blair M F, Bailey D A 1977 J. Eng. Power 99 77
Google Scholar
[5] Wang Q C, Wang Z G, Zhao Y X 2017 Phys. Fluids 29 116106
Google Scholar
[6] Thara-Reshma I V, Vinoth P, Rajesh G, Ben-Dor G 2021 J. Fluid Mech. 924 A37
Google Scholar
[7] Kokkinakis I W, Drikakis D, Spottswood S M, Brouwer K R, Riley Z B 2023 Phys. Fluids 35 106109
Google Scholar
[8] Zhang T, Pu J, Zhou W L, Wang J H, Wu W L, Chen Y 2021 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 175 121384
Google Scholar
[9] Pu J, Zhang T, Wang J H 2022 Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer 130 105834
Google Scholar
[10] Su C H 2019 AIAA J 57 2840
Google Scholar
[11] Zhao X H, Yi S H, Mi Q, Ding H L, He L 2022 AIAA J. 60 1262
Google Scholar
[12] Sun X B, Ding H L, Liu M X, Yi S H, Zhao Y X 2023 Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 140 108488
Google Scholar
[13] Lin J X, Wang Q C, Zhao Y X, Lu X G 2023 Phys. Fluids 35 056107
Google Scholar
[14] Marquardt P, Klaas M, Schröder W 2020 Exp. Fluids 61 160
Google Scholar
[15] Sun X K, Ni H, Peng W, Jiang P X, Zhu Y H 2021 Chin. J. Aeronaut. 34 452
Google Scholar
[16] Ifti H S, Hermann T, Ewenz Rocher M, Doherty L, Hambidge C, McGilvray M, Vandeperre L 2022 Exp. Fluids 63 102
Google Scholar
[17] Singh K, Udayraj 2022 Appl. Therm. Eng. 208 118224
Google Scholar
[18] Qin Y M, Li X Y, Ren J, Jiang H D 2015 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 86 482
Google Scholar
[19] Peter J M F, Kloker M J 2022 Phys. Fluids 34 025125
Google Scholar
[20] Zhao X H, Yi S H, Mi Q, Ding H L, Niu H B 2022 Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 123 107457
Google Scholar
[21] Zhao Y X, Yi S H, Tian L F, Cheng Z 2009 Sci. China, Ser. E: Technol. Sci. 52 3640
Google Scholar
[22] 郑文鹏, 易仕和, 牛海波, 霍俊杰 2021 物理学报 70 244702
Google Scholar
Zheng W P, Yi S H, Niu H B, Huo J J 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 244702
Google Scholar
[23] 牛海波, 易仕和, 刘小林, 霍俊杰, 冈敦殿 2021 物理学报 70 134701
Google Scholar
Niu H B, Yi S H, Liu X L, Huo J J, Gang D D 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 134701
Google Scholar
[24] 刘小林, 易仕和, 牛海波, 陆小革 2018 物理学报 67 214701
Google Scholar
Liu X L, Yi S H, Niu H B, Lu X G 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 214701
Google Scholar
[25] 刘小林, 易仕和, 牛海波, 陆小革, 赵鑫海 2018 物理学报 67 174701
Google Scholar
Liu X L, Yi S H, Niu H B, Lu X G, Zhao X H 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 174701
Google Scholar
[26] Tichenor N R, Humble R A, Bowersox R D W 2013 J. Fluid Mech. 722 187
Google Scholar
[27] Wang Q C, Wang Z G 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 114102
Google Scholar
[28] Zhang Z, Yi S, Liu X L, Hu Y F, Chen S K 2024 Phys. Fluids 36 036127
Google Scholar
[29] Bradshaw P 2006 J. Fluid Mech. 52 113
Google Scholar
[30] Bradshaw P 1974 J. Fluid Mech. 63 449
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 1785
- PDF Downloads: 50
- Cited By: 0
