-
The heat transfer of supercritical pseudo-boiling has been preliminarily studied, but the definition of gas-liquid interface is still not unified. The fluid-structure coupling numerical simulation of heat transfer characteristics in supercritical CO2 pool is carried out by using laminar flow model. Platinum wire is the heating element, with diameter d = 70 μm. The heat flux density qw is in a range of 0–2000 kW/m2, and the pressure P is in a range of 8–10 MPa. Multi-scale mesh is used to model the heating wire, and simulation values accord well with the experimental data. The results show that due to the increase of the circumferential average Rayleigh number Raave of the heating filament with qw, the characteristic of the natural convection zone is that h increases with qw. The temperatures of the four characteristic working conditions in the evaporation-like zone show a downward trend along the r direction. Through analogy with subcritical heat transfer and by calculating the thermal conductivity ratio Qcon/Qt, the supercritical is divided into three regions, T < TL is liquid-like region (LL), TL < T < TM is two-phase-like region (TPL), T > TM is vapor-like region (VL). The rule is the same as that of x partition according to supercritical pseudo-boiling dryness. According to the curves of average thermal conductivity λave and thermal resistance RG versus heat flux qw, determined by calculating thermal conductivity ratio, the variation law of heat transfer coefficient h with qw in evaporation-like region can be well explained, as qw increases, the thermal conductivity thermal resistance RG increases, and the heat from the heating filament is difficult to transfer to the fluid outside the vapor-like membrane, leading the heat transfer coefficient h to decrease when qA < qw < qC, and a significant increase in λave when qw > qC, and the recovery of heat transfer when h rises again. In this paper, a new method of determining the gas-liquid interface of supercritical pool heat transfer is proposed. This method can effectively explain the heat transfer mechanism in the evaporation-like zone, and provide a theoretical basis for developing supercritical pool heat transfer in the future.
-
Keywords:
- supercritical /
- pool heat transfer /
- fluid-structure coupling /
- numerical simulation
[1] Tsai W C, Wang Y D 2019 Prog. Polym. Sci. 98 101161
Google Scholar
[2] Knez Z, Markocic E, Leitgeb M, Primozic M, Hrncic M K, Skerget M 2014 Energy 77 235
Google Scholar
[3] Sarkar J 2015 Renew Sust. Energ Rev. 48 434
Google Scholar
[4] Liu Y P, Wang Y, Huang D G 2019 Energy 189 115900
Google Scholar
[5] Kafengauz N L, Fedorov M I 1966 J. Eng. Phys. 11 99
Google Scholar
[6] Ackerman J W 1970 J. Heat Trans. 92 490
Google Scholar
[7] Knapp K K, Sabersky R H 1965 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 9 41
Google Scholar
[8] Abadzic E, Goldstein R J 1970 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 13 1163
Google Scholar
[9] Tamba J, Takahashi T, Ohara T, Aihara T 1998 Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 17 248
Google Scholar
[10] Zhu B G, Xu J L, Yan C S, Xie J 2020 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 148 119080
Google Scholar
[11] Xu J L, Zhang H S, Zhu B G, Xie J 2020 Sol. Energy 195 27
Google Scholar
[12] Zhua B G, Xu J L, Wua X M, Xie J, Li M J 2019 Int. J. Therm. Sci. 136 254
Google Scholar
[13] Huang D, Wu Z, Sunden B, Li W 2016 Appl. Energ. 162 494
Google Scholar
[14] Rousselet Y, Warrier G 2012 J. Heat Transfer 135 022501
Google Scholar
[15] Warrier G, Rousselet Y 2012 J. Heat Transfer 135 022502
Google Scholar
[16] 张海松, 徐进良, 朱鑫杰 2021 物理学报 70 044401
Google Scholar
Zhang H S, Xu J L, Zhu X J 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 044401
Google Scholar
[17] Cheng L Y, Wang Q Y, Xu J L, 2024 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 220 124953
Google Scholar
[18] He X T, Xu J L, Yu X J, Xie J 2023 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 214 124417
Google Scholar
[19] 何孝天, 徐进良, 程怡玮 2023 物理学报 72 057801
Google Scholar
He X T, Xu J L, Cheng Y W 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 057801
Google Scholar
[20] Simeoni G G, Bryk T, Gorelli F A, Krisch M, Ruocco G, Santoro M, Scopigno T 2010 Nat. Phys. 6 503
Google Scholar
[21] Maxi F, Contescu C, Boillat P, Niceno B, Karalis K, Testino A, Ludwig C H 2019 Nat. Commun. 19 12117
Google Scholar
[22] Banuti D T 2015 J. Supercrit. Fluid 98 12
Google Scholar
[23] Xu J L, Wang Y, Ma X J 2021 Phys. Rev. 104 014142
Google Scholar
[24] Wang Q Y, Ma X J, Xu J L, Li M J, Wang Y 2021 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 181 121875
Google Scholar
[25] 闫晨帅, 徐进良 2020 物理学报 4 044401
Google Scholar
Yan C S, Xu J L 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 4 044401
Google Scholar
[26] Tripathi P M, Basu S 2021 Phys. Fluids 33 043304
Google Scholar
[27] Li X L, Yu X Y, Liu P T, Fan Y H, Yang D L, Tang G H 2023 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 216 124563
Google Scholar
[28] Wang J T, Li Z L, Zhai Y L, Wang H 2023 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 201 123571
Google Scholar
[29] 于博文, 何孝天, 徐进良 2023 中国科学: 技术科学 3 25
Google Scholar
Yu B W, He X T, Xu J L 2023 Sci. Sin. Tech. 3 25
Google Scholar
[30] 杨世铭, 陶文铨 2011 传热学 (北京: 高等教育出版社)
Yang S M, Tao W Q 2011 Heat Transfer Science (Beijing: Higher Education Press
[31] He X T, Xu J L, Xie J 2024 Phys. Fluids 36 013343
Google Scholar
[32] Liu M, Liu S H, Xi D P, Huang S F, Huang Y P 2023 Nucl. Energy 104 2391
Google Scholar
-
图 1 几何模型和网格划分示意图
Figure 1. Geometric model and grid diagram.
图 2 模型验证 (a)热流密度随Tw-Tpc变化; (b)平均瑞利数Raave随热流密度变化; (c)热流密度随壁温变化; (d)换热系数随热流密度变化规律
Figure 2. Model verification: (a) Heat flux varies with Tw-Tpc, (b) Raave varies with heat flux; (c) heat flux varies with wall temperature; (d) heat transfer coefficient varies with heat flux.
图 3 不同工况温度和密度沿r方向变化规律 (a), (b) Case A, qw = 87.73 kW/m2; (c), (d) P = 10 MPa, Tb = 288 K; θ = 90°
Figure 3. Temperature and density change in r direction under different working conditions: (a), (b) Case A, qw = 87.73 kW/m2; (c), (d) P = 10 MPa, Tb = 288 K; θ = 90°.
图 4 Qcon计算网格二维示意图
Figure 4. Two-dimensional diagram of Qcon computing grid.
图 5 qw = 233.33 kW/m2, θ = 90°时, 亚临界与超临界导热占比Qcon/Qt沿r方向变化类比 (a) 亚临界P = 6 MPa; (b) 超临界P = 10 MPa
Figure 5. Subcritical and supercritical thermal conductivity ratio Qcon/Qt changes along the r direction with qw = 233.33 kW/m2, θ = 90°: (a) Subcritical P = 6 MPa; (b) supercritical P = 10 MPa.
图 6 不同压力下速度矢量图 (a) 亚临界P = 6 MPa; (b) 超临界P = 10 MPa
Figure 6. Velocity vector diagram at different pressures: (a) Subcritical P = 6 MPa; (b) supercritical P = 10 MPa.
图 7 Qcon/Qt随r变化规律 (a) Case A工况; (b) 同一角度不同工况下Qcon/Qt随r变化规律
Figure 7. Qcon/Qt changes with r: (a) Case A working condition; (b) Qcon/Qt changes with r under the same angle and different working conditions.
图 8 不同工况下Qcon/Qt随类沸腾干度x变化曲线
Figure 8. Qcon/Qt curve with boiling dryness x under different working conditions.
图 9 (a) 导热热阻RG随热流密度变化曲线; (b) 平均导热λave随热流密度变化曲线
Figure 9. (a) Curve of thermal resistance RG with heat flux; (b) average thermal conductivity λave with heat flux curve.
表 1 网格独立性验证
Table 1. Grid independence verification.
Grid No. 径向节点数 周向节点数 Tw/K 网格数 误差/% 1 100 21 310.2 407.7×104 –3.71 2 100 41 316.0 82.6×104 –1.88 3 100 81 321.3 169.8×104 –0.26/0.23 4 100 121 322.1 261.4×104 0 5 40 81 328.7 156.3×104 2.08 6 70 81 326.1 163.1×104 1.29 7 130 81 322.0 176.5×104 0 
DownLoad: CSV
-
[1] Tsai W C, Wang Y D 2019 Prog. Polym. Sci. 98 101161
Google Scholar
[2] Knez Z, Markocic E, Leitgeb M, Primozic M, Hrncic M K, Skerget M 2014 Energy 77 235
Google Scholar
[3] Sarkar J 2015 Renew Sust. Energ Rev. 48 434
Google Scholar
[4] Liu Y P, Wang Y, Huang D G 2019 Energy 189 115900
Google Scholar
[5] Kafengauz N L, Fedorov M I 1966 J. Eng. Phys. 11 99
Google Scholar
[6] Ackerman J W 1970 J. Heat Trans. 92 490
Google Scholar
[7] Knapp K K, Sabersky R H 1965 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 9 41
Google Scholar
[8] Abadzic E, Goldstein R J 1970 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 13 1163
Google Scholar
[9] Tamba J, Takahashi T, Ohara T, Aihara T 1998 Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 17 248
Google Scholar
[10] Zhu B G, Xu J L, Yan C S, Xie J 2020 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 148 119080
Google Scholar
[11] Xu J L, Zhang H S, Zhu B G, Xie J 2020 Sol. Energy 195 27
Google Scholar
[12] Zhua B G, Xu J L, Wua X M, Xie J, Li M J 2019 Int. J. Therm. Sci. 136 254
Google Scholar
[13] Huang D, Wu Z, Sunden B, Li W 2016 Appl. Energ. 162 494
Google Scholar
[14] Rousselet Y, Warrier G 2012 J. Heat Transfer 135 022501
Google Scholar
[15] Warrier G, Rousselet Y 2012 J. Heat Transfer 135 022502
Google Scholar
[16] 张海松, 徐进良, 朱鑫杰 2021 物理学报 70 044401
Google Scholar
Zhang H S, Xu J L, Zhu X J 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 044401
Google Scholar
[17] Cheng L Y, Wang Q Y, Xu J L, 2024 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 220 124953
Google Scholar
[18] He X T, Xu J L, Yu X J, Xie J 2023 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 214 124417
Google Scholar
[19] 何孝天, 徐进良, 程怡玮 2023 物理学报 72 057801
Google Scholar
He X T, Xu J L, Cheng Y W 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 057801
Google Scholar
[20] Simeoni G G, Bryk T, Gorelli F A, Krisch M, Ruocco G, Santoro M, Scopigno T 2010 Nat. Phys. 6 503
Google Scholar
[21] Maxi F, Contescu C, Boillat P, Niceno B, Karalis K, Testino A, Ludwig C H 2019 Nat. Commun. 19 12117
Google Scholar
[22] Banuti D T 2015 J. Supercrit. Fluid 98 12
Google Scholar
[23] Xu J L, Wang Y, Ma X J 2021 Phys. Rev. 104 014142
Google Scholar
[24] Wang Q Y, Ma X J, Xu J L, Li M J, Wang Y 2021 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 181 121875
Google Scholar
[25] 闫晨帅, 徐进良 2020 物理学报 4 044401
Google Scholar
Yan C S, Xu J L 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 4 044401
Google Scholar
[26] Tripathi P M, Basu S 2021 Phys. Fluids 33 043304
Google Scholar
[27] Li X L, Yu X Y, Liu P T, Fan Y H, Yang D L, Tang G H 2023 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 216 124563
Google Scholar
[28] Wang J T, Li Z L, Zhai Y L, Wang H 2023 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 201 123571
Google Scholar
[29] 于博文, 何孝天, 徐进良 2023 中国科学: 技术科学 3 25
Google Scholar
Yu B W, He X T, Xu J L 2023 Sci. Sin. Tech. 3 25
Google Scholar
[30] 杨世铭, 陶文铨 2011 传热学 (北京: 高等教育出版社)
Yang S M, Tao W Q 2011 Heat Transfer Science (Beijing: Higher Education Press
[31] He X T, Xu J L, Xie J 2024 Phys. Fluids 36 013343
Google Scholar
[32] Liu M, Liu S H, Xi D P, Huang S F, Huang Y P 2023 Nucl. Energy 104 2391
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 1995
- PDF Downloads: 125
- Cited By: 0
