-
The current preamplifier is one of the important components of the scanning tunneling microscope (STM), and its performance is crucial to the basic operations of the STM system, as well as for the development of demanding novel functionalities such as autonomous atomic fabrication. In this study, the factors that affect the performance of a current preamplifier including its noise spectrum density and the bandwidth were thoroughly analyzed, and a preamplifier was designed and fabricated specifically for STM systems. By employing a careful-selected low-noise op amp chip, the optimized current preamplifier has a noise floor as low as 4fA/√Hz and a bandwidth of 2.3 kHz, at its most sensitive transimpedance gain of 1 GΩ. It has three transimpedance gains, 10 MΩ, 100 MΩ, and 1 GΩ, that can be switched through digital control signals. A two-switch configuration was adopted to minimize the noise floor while maintaining the optimized bandwidth. The current detectable by this three-level preamplifier ranges from pA to μA, satisfying the requirements of most STM operations. Using this preamplifier, the fundamental functions of the STM system were successfully demonstrated include surface topographic characterization, scanning tunneling spectroscopy, and single atom/molecule manipulation. The measurement of shot noise in tunneling current was explored as well, and a linear relationship between shot noise and tunneling current was obtained by careful noise analysis. It is illustrated that the Fano factor of the shot noise in a normal metallic tunneling junction is approximately equal to 1, revealing the expected Poisson process for electron tunneling in such scenario. The results are valuable for high-resolution characterization of correlation systems in the future.
-
Keywords:
- scanning tunneling microscope /
- preamplifier /
- shot noise
-
[1] Binnig G, Rohrer H, Gerber C, Weibel E 1982 Phys Rev Lett 49 57
[2] Stroscio J A, Feenstra R M, Fein A P 1986 Phys Rev Lett 57 2579
[3] Chen C J 2021 Introduction to Scanning Tunneling Microscopy Third Edition (Vol. 69) (Oxford University Press, USA)
[4] Scheiber P, Riss A, Schmid M, Varga P, Diebold U 2010 Phys Rev Lett 105 216101
[5] Eigler D M, Schweizer E K 1990 Nature 344 524
[6] Bartels L, Meyer G, Rieder K H 1997 Phys Rev Lett 79 697
[7] Kalff F E, Rebergen M P, Fahrenfort E, Girovsky J, Toskovic R, Lado J L, Fernandez-Rossier J, Otte A F 2016 Nat Nanotechnol 11 926
[8] Štubian M, Bobek J, Setvin M, Diebold U, Schmid M 2020 Review of Scientific Instruments 91 074701
[9] de-Picciotto R, Reznikov M, Heiblum M, Umansky V, Bunin G, Mahalu D 1997 Nature 389 162
[10] Saminadayar L, Glattli D C, Jin Y, Etienne B 1997 Phys Rev Lett 79 2526
[11] Jehl X, Sanquer M, Calemczuk R, Mailly D 2000 Nature 405 50
[12] Bastiaans K M, Chatzopoulos D, Ge J F, Cho D, Tromp W O, van Ruitenbeek J M, Fischer M H, de Visser P J, Thoen D J, Driessen E F C, Klapwijk T M, Allan M P 2021 Science 374 608
[13] Kumar A, Saminadayar L, Glattli D C, Jin Y, Etienne B 1996 Phys Rev Lett 76 2778
[14] DiCarlo L, Zhang Y, McClure D T, Reilly D J, Marcus C M, Pfeiffer L N, West K W 2006 Phys Rev Lett 97 036810
[15] Hashisaka M, Ota T, Yamagishi M, Fujisawa T, Muraki K 2014 Review of Scientific Instruments 85 054704
[16] Henny M, Oberholzer S, Strunk C, Schönenberger C 1999 Physical Review B 59 2871
[17] Chen R, Wheeler P J, Natelson D 2012 Physical Review B 85 235455
[18] Bastiaans K M, Benschop T, Chatzopoulos D, Cho D, Dong Q, Jin Y, Allan M P 2018 Review of Scientific Instruments 89 093709
[19] Kay A 2012 Operational amplifier noise: techniques and tips for analyzing and reducing noise (Elsevier)
[20] Horowitz P, Hill W, Robinson I 1989 The art of electronics (Vol. 2) (Cambridge university press Cambridge)
[21] Mikhael W B, Michael S 1987 Ieee T Circuits Syst 34 449
[22] Blanter Y M, Büttiker M 2000 Physics Reports 336 1
[23] Kobayashi K, Hashisaka M 2021 J Phys Soc Jpn 90 102001
[24] Birk H, De Jong M, Schönenberger C 1995 Phys Rev Lett 75 1610
Metrics
- Abstract views: 218
- PDF Downloads: 3
- Cited By: 0