Laser envelope control of strong field excited Rydberg states

Zhao Ling-Yi; Liu Jin-Lei; Jiang Tao; Lang Yue; Zhao Zeng-Xiu

doi:10.7498/aps.73.20241222

Abstract

Rydberg atoms are important building blocks for quantum technologies, and because of their unique tunable quantum properties, they possess new applications in quantum computing, quantum communication, and quantum sensing. Besides the widely-used few-photon resonant excitation for the specific Rydberg state, multiple Rydberg states can be populated coherently and efficiently through the frustrated tunneling ionization or the Coulomb potential recapture effect in a strong laser field. The excitation of Rydberg states in a strong field provides an opportunity for realizing the ultrafast quantum control on Rydberg atom and bridging the gap between strong field physics and quantum information technology. Using the classical trajectory Monte Carlo method and Qprop package to solve time-dependent Schrödinger equation, we calculate the population of Rydberg states. Our results show that the population increases with the increase of parameter of the asymmetric laser envelope. Based on the quantitative rescattering theory, the calculated time-dependent recapture rate is negatively related to the laser envelope and the residual laser interaction time, which is termed the envelope effect. Combined with the carrier-wave effect, an analytic formula can be used to calculate the Rydberg state population: $ Y(t) \propto $$ W_0\left(t\right) \dfrac{t-\tau+c}{f\left(t\right)} \cos \left(\omega t+\phi\right) . $ This result opens the way to enhancing the generation of Rydberg states by using the laser envelope control, which is beneficial to the future quantum technology based on the Rydberg states generated in the strong laser field.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

1.
College of Science, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
2.
Hunan Key Laboratory of Extreme Matter and Applications, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China

Corresponding author: Liu Jin-Lei, liujinlei@nudt.edu.cn ; Zhao Zeng-Xiu, zhaozengxiu@nudt.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2019YFA0307703), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12234020, 12274461, 11974426), the National Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (Grant No. 211141972034), and the Foundation of National University of Defense Technology, China (Grant No. ZK22-31).

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Saffman M, Walker T G, Mølmer K 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 2313 Google Scholar
[2]	Jing M Y, Hu Y, Ma J, Zhang H, Zhang L J, Xiao L T, Jia S T 2020 Nat. Phys. 16 911 Google Scholar
[3]	Adams C S, Pritchard J D, Shaffer J P 2020 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 53 012002 Google Scholar
[4]	Urban E, Johnson T A, Henage T, Isenhower L, Yavuz D D, Walker T G, Saffman M 2009 Nat. Phys. 5 110 Google Scholar
[5]	Pan L, Zhai H 2022 Phys. Rev. Res. 4 L032037 Google Scholar
[6]	Jaksch D, Cirac J I, Zoller P, Rolston S L, Côté R, Lukin M D 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 2208 Google Scholar
[7]	Baur S, Tiarks D, Rempe G, Dürr S 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 073901 Google Scholar
[8]	Vassen W, Cohen-Tannoudji C, Leduc M, et al. 2012 Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 175 Google Scholar
[9]	Saffman M, Walker T G 2002 Phys. Rev. A 66 065403 Google Scholar
[10]	Corkum P B 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 1994 Google Scholar
[11]	Schafer K J, Yang B, DiMauro L F, Kulander K C 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1599 Google Scholar
[12]	Becker W, Liu X J, Ho P J, Eberly J H 2012 Rev. Mod. Phys 84 1011 Google Scholar
[13]	沈星晨, 刘洋, 陈淇, 吕航, 徐海峰 2022 物理学报 71 233202 Google Scholar Shen X C, Liu Y, Chen Q, Lü H, Xu H F 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 233202 Google Scholar
[14]	Freeman R R, Bucksbaum P H, Milchberg H, Darack S, Schumacher D, Geusic M E 1987 Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 1092 Google Scholar
[15]	De Boer M P, Muller H G 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 2747 Google Scholar
[16]	Wang B B, Li X F, Fu P M, Chen J, Liu J 2006 Chin. Phys. Lett. 23 2729 Google Scholar
[17]	Nubbemeyer T, Gorling K, Saenz A, Eichmann U, Sandner W 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 233001 Google Scholar
[18]	Eichmann U, Saenz A, Eilzer S, Nubbemeyer T, Sandner W 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 203002 Google Scholar
[19]	Li Q G, Tong X M, Morishita T, Wei H, Lin C D 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 023421 Google Scholar
[20]	Ortmann L, Hofmann C, Landsman A S 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 033415 Google Scholar
[21]	Liu M Q, Xu S P, Hu S L, Becker W, Quan W, Liu X J, Chen J 2021 Optica 8 765 Google Scholar
[22]	Ortmann L, Hofmann C, Ivanov I A, Landsman A S 2021 Phys. Rev. A 103 063112 Google Scholar
[23]	Zhao J, Liu J L, Wang X W, Zhao Z X 2024 Chin. Phys. Lett. 41 013201 Google Scholar
[24]	Liu J L, Zhao J, Huang Y D, Wang X W, Zhao Z X 2020 Phys. Rev. A 102 023109 Google Scholar
[25]	Chetty D, Glover R D, Tong X M, deHarak B A, Xu H, Haram N, Bartschat K, Palmer A J, Luiten A N, Light P S, Litvinyuk I V, Sang R T 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 173201 Google Scholar
[26]	Larimian S, Lemell C, Stummer V, et al. 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 021403 Google Scholar
[27]	Venzke J, Gebre Y, Becker A, Jaroń-Becker A 2020 Phys. Rev. A 101 053425 Google Scholar
[28]	Solanpää J, Räsänen E 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 053422 Google Scholar
[29]	Zhang B, Chen W B, Zhao Z X 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 023409 Google Scholar
[30]	Zhao X Y, Wang C C, Hu S L, Li W D, Chen J, Hao X L 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 083202 Google Scholar
[31]	Toyota K, Saalmann U, Rost J M 2015 New J. Phys. 17 073005 Google Scholar
[32]	Ning Q C, Saalmann U, Rost J M 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 033203 Google Scholar
[33]	Leemans W P, Catravas P, Esarey E, Geddes C, Toth C, Trines R, Schroeder C B, Shadwick B A, Van-Tilborg J, Faure J 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 174802 Google Scholar
[34]	Tulsky V, Bauer D 2020 Comput. Phys. Commun. 251 107098 Google Scholar
[35]	Ammosov M V, Delone N B, Krainov V P 1986 J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 64 1191 Google Scholar
[36]	Delone N B, Krainov V P 1991 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 8 1207 Google Scholar
[37]	Liu J L, Chen W B, Zhang B, Zhao J, Wu J H, Yuan J M, Zhao Z X 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 063420 Google Scholar
[38]	Becker R L, MacKellar A D 1984 J. Phys. B:At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 17 3923 Google Scholar
[39]	Emmanouilidou A, Lazarou C, Staudte A, Eichmann U 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 011402 Google Scholar
[40]	Shvetsov-Shilovski N I, Goreslavski S P, Popruzhenko S V, Becker W 2009 Laser Phys. 19 1550 Google Scholar
[41]	Le A T, Lucchese R R, Tonzani S, Morishita T, Lin C D 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 013401 Google Scholar
[42]	Chetty D, Glover R D, deHarak B A, et al. 2020 Phys. Rev. A 101 053402 Google Scholar
[43]	Bengs U, Patchkovskii S, Ivanov M, Zhavoronkov N 2022 Phys. Rev. Res. 4 023135 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 Rydberg态产额随激光脉冲参数的变化　(a)具有相同脉冲持续时间$ \tau=10 T_0 $和不同不对称参数α的激光电场, 其中黑色实线、红色虚线、蓝色点线分别对应$ \alpha= $$ -0.6, ~0, ~0.6 $; (b)在不同激光脉冲持续时间下, Rydberg态的产率随不对称参数的变化而变化, 黑、红、蓝线分别对应$ \tau= $$ 10T_0,~ 15T_0, ~20T_0 $, 实线和点线分别为CTMC和TDSE计算的Rydberg态激发的产率, 当α从–0.6增至0.6时, Rydberg态的产率约增大1倍, 表明在上升沿较长的激光脉冲中更有可能产生Rydberg态

Figure 1. Rydberg state yield variation with laser pulse parameters. (a) Laser electric fields with the same pulse duration $ \tau=10 T_0 $ and different asymmetric parameters α. Black solid line, red dashed line and blue dotted line are for $ \alpha=-0.6,~ 0, ~0.6 $ respectively. (b) The yields of Rydberg states change with the asymmetric parameter under different laser pulse duration. Black, red and blue lines are for $ \tau=10 T_0, 15 T_0, 20 T_0 $, while solid line and dotted line are for RSE yields calculated using CTMC and TDSE respectively. The yields of the Rydberg states approximately double when α increases from –0.6 to 0.6, indicating the Rydberg states are more possible to be generated in the laser pulse with longer rising edge.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 Rydberg态的时间依赖性, 在相同脉冲持续时间$ \tau= $$ 10 T_0 $下, 不对称参数(a)—(c)$ \alpha=-0.6, 0, 0.6 $时的$ Y(t) $(黑色实线)和$ W_0(t)\sigma(t) $(红色虚线), Rydberg态主要是由电子在每个半周期的场峰附近隧穿产生的, 称为“载波效应”, 对于不同的α, 主导周期随包络线的不对称性而变化, 这可称为“包络效应”

Figure 2. Time dependence of the Rydberg states yields. (a)−(c) The time dependence of the Rydberg states yields Y(t) (black solid line) and $ W_0(t)\sigma(t) $ (red dashed line) with the same pulse duration $ \tau=10 T_0 $ and the asymmetric parameters $ \alpha=-0.6, 0, 0.6 $. The Rydberg states are mainly generated from electrons tunneling near the field peak of each half-cycle termed as “carrier-wave effect”. For different α, the dominating cycles change with the asymmetry of the envelope, which can be termed as “envelope effect”.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 不对称包络下的时间依赖性　(a)不同不对称参数下的激光脉冲包络线; (b)激光包络对称$ \alpha=0 $时再捕获率的时间依赖性; (c)不同不对称参数下每半周期平均总再捕获率的时间依赖性; 在(a)和(c)中, 黑色实线、红色虚线和蓝色点线分别表示$ \alpha=-0.6,~ 0, ~0.6 $, 对于不同的不对称参数, 再捕获率与包络线均呈现负相关关系, 使得再捕获率在隧穿电离的主导周期内达到最小

Figure 3. Time dependence of the recapture rate with asymmetric laser pulse envelopes: (a) Laser pulse envelopes with different asymmetric parameters; (b) the time dependence of the recapture rate with symmetric laser envelope $ \alpha=0 $; (c) the time dependence of the total recapture rate averaged in every half-cycle with different asymmetric parameters; black solid line, red dashed line and blue dotted line are for $ \alpha=-0.6,~ 0, ~0.6 $ respectively in (a) and (c), the negative relation between recapture rate and the envelope is universal for different asymmetric parameters, making the recapture rate attain minimization in the dominating cycles of tunneling ionization.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 梯形激光脉冲包络线下的时间依赖性　(a)具有余弦平方和线性边缘的梯形激光脉冲包络; (b)梯形激光脉冲包络每半周期总再捕获率的时间依赖性, 当残余激光相互作用时间超过特定标准时, 电子轨迹从再捕获转变为弹性散射; (c)在与图1相同的激光参数下, 利用(10)式得到的Rydberg态的产率, 其中随α的增大与利用CTMC和TDSE计算得到的布居吻合得很好

Figure 4. Time dependence of the recapture rate with trapezoidal laser pulse envelopes: (a) Trapezoidal laser pulse envelopes with cosine square and linear edges; (b) the time dependence of the total recapture rate in every half-cycle with trapezoidal laser pulse envelopes, the increase can be due to the change of the electron’s trajectory from recapture to elastic recollision when the residual laser interaction time exceed a specific criterion; (c) the yield of the Rydberg states using Eq. (10) under the same laser parameters with Fig. 1, where the increase with α agrees well with the calculated population using CTMC and TDSE.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

[1]	Saffman M, Walker T G, Mølmer K 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 2313 Google Scholar
[2]	Jing M Y, Hu Y, Ma J, Zhang H, Zhang L J, Xiao L T, Jia S T 2020 Nat. Phys. 16 911 Google Scholar
[3]	Adams C S, Pritchard J D, Shaffer J P 2020 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 53 012002 Google Scholar
[4]	Urban E, Johnson T A, Henage T, Isenhower L, Yavuz D D, Walker T G, Saffman M 2009 Nat. Phys. 5 110 Google Scholar
[5]	Pan L, Zhai H 2022 Phys. Rev. Res. 4 L032037 Google Scholar
[6]	Jaksch D, Cirac J I, Zoller P, Rolston S L, Côté R, Lukin M D 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 2208 Google Scholar
[7]	Baur S, Tiarks D, Rempe G, Dürr S 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 073901 Google Scholar
[8]	Vassen W, Cohen-Tannoudji C, Leduc M, et al. 2012 Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 175 Google Scholar
[9]	Saffman M, Walker T G 2002 Phys. Rev. A 66 065403 Google Scholar
[10]	Corkum P B 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 1994 Google Scholar
[11]	Schafer K J, Yang B, DiMauro L F, Kulander K C 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1599 Google Scholar
[12]	Becker W, Liu X J, Ho P J, Eberly J H 2012 Rev. Mod. Phys 84 1011 Google Scholar
[13]	沈星晨, 刘洋, 陈淇, 吕航, 徐海峰 2022 物理学报 71 233202 Google Scholar Shen X C, Liu Y, Chen Q, Lü H, Xu H F 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 233202 Google Scholar
[14]	Freeman R R, Bucksbaum P H, Milchberg H, Darack S, Schumacher D, Geusic M E 1987 Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 1092 Google Scholar
[15]	De Boer M P, Muller H G 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 2747 Google Scholar
[16]	Wang B B, Li X F, Fu P M, Chen J, Liu J 2006 Chin. Phys. Lett. 23 2729 Google Scholar
[17]	Nubbemeyer T, Gorling K, Saenz A, Eichmann U, Sandner W 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 233001 Google Scholar
[18]	Eichmann U, Saenz A, Eilzer S, Nubbemeyer T, Sandner W 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 203002 Google Scholar
[19]	Li Q G, Tong X M, Morishita T, Wei H, Lin C D 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 023421 Google Scholar
[20]	Ortmann L, Hofmann C, Landsman A S 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 033415 Google Scholar
[21]	Liu M Q, Xu S P, Hu S L, Becker W, Quan W, Liu X J, Chen J 2021 Optica 8 765 Google Scholar
[22]	Ortmann L, Hofmann C, Ivanov I A, Landsman A S 2021 Phys. Rev. A 103 063112 Google Scholar
[23]	Zhao J, Liu J L, Wang X W, Zhao Z X 2024 Chin. Phys. Lett. 41 013201 Google Scholar
[24]	Liu J L, Zhao J, Huang Y D, Wang X W, Zhao Z X 2020 Phys. Rev. A 102 023109 Google Scholar
[25]	Chetty D, Glover R D, Tong X M, deHarak B A, Xu H, Haram N, Bartschat K, Palmer A J, Luiten A N, Light P S, Litvinyuk I V, Sang R T 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 173201 Google Scholar
[26]	Larimian S, Lemell C, Stummer V, et al. 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 021403 Google Scholar
[27]	Venzke J, Gebre Y, Becker A, Jaroń-Becker A 2020 Phys. Rev. A 101 053425 Google Scholar
[28]	Solanpää J, Räsänen E 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 053422 Google Scholar
[29]	Zhang B, Chen W B, Zhao Z X 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 023409 Google Scholar
[30]	Zhao X Y, Wang C C, Hu S L, Li W D, Chen J, Hao X L 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 083202 Google Scholar
[31]	Toyota K, Saalmann U, Rost J M 2015 New J. Phys. 17 073005 Google Scholar
[32]	Ning Q C, Saalmann U, Rost J M 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 033203 Google Scholar
[33]	Leemans W P, Catravas P, Esarey E, Geddes C, Toth C, Trines R, Schroeder C B, Shadwick B A, Van-Tilborg J, Faure J 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 174802 Google Scholar
[34]	Tulsky V, Bauer D 2020 Comput. Phys. Commun. 251 107098 Google Scholar
[35]	Ammosov M V, Delone N B, Krainov V P 1986 J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 64 1191 Google Scholar
[36]	Delone N B, Krainov V P 1991 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 8 1207 Google Scholar
[37]	Liu J L, Chen W B, Zhang B, Zhao J, Wu J H, Yuan J M, Zhao Z X 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 063420 Google Scholar
[38]	Becker R L, MacKellar A D 1984 J. Phys. B:At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 17 3923 Google Scholar
[39]	Emmanouilidou A, Lazarou C, Staudte A, Eichmann U 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 011402 Google Scholar
[40]	Shvetsov-Shilovski N I, Goreslavski S P, Popruzhenko S V, Becker W 2009 Laser Phys. 19 1550 Google Scholar
[41]	Le A T, Lucchese R R, Tonzani S, Morishita T, Lin C D 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 013401 Google Scholar
[42]	Chetty D, Glover R D, deHarak B A, et al. 2020 Phys. Rev. A 101 053402 Google Scholar
[43]	Bengs U, Patchkovskii S, Ivanov M, Zhavoronkov N 2022 Phys. Rev. Res. 4 023135 Google Scholar

[1]	He Tong-Tong, Liu Zi-Chao, Li Ying-Bin, Huang Cheng. Manipulating nonsequential double ionization of atoms by parallel polarized three-color laser fields. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(16): 163201. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240737
[2]	Jia Yun-Zhe, Meng Sheng. Ultrafast dynamics of water system under photoexcitation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(8): 084204. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240047
[3]	Tao Chen-Yu, Lei Jian-Ting, Yu Xuan, Luo Yan, Ma Xin-Wen, Zhang Shao-Feng. Development of attosecond pulses and their application to ultrafast dynamics of atoms and molecules. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(5): 053202. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222436
[4]	Li Ying-Bin, Qin Ling-Ling, Chen Hong-Mei, Li Yi-Han, He Jin-Jin, Shi Lu-Ke, Zhai Chun-Yang, Tang Qing-Bin, Liu Ai-Hua, Yu Ben-Hai. Energy exchange in ultrafast dynamics of atom with strong laser fields. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(4): 043201. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211703
[5]	Shen Xing-Chen, Liu Yang, Chen Qi, Lü Hang, Xu Hai-Feng. Rydberg state excitation of atoms and molecules in ultrafast intense laser field. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(23): 233202. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20221258
[6]	. Energy exchange in ultrafast dynamics of atom with strong laser fields. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, (): . doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211703
[7]	Xiang Mei, Ling Feng-Zi, Deng Xu-Lan, Wei Jie, Bumaliya Abulimiti, Zhang Bing. Ultrafast dynamics of electron excited states of phenylacetylene. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(5): 053302. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201473
[8]	Qin Chao-Chao, Cui Ming-Huan, Song Di-Di, He Wei. Ultrafast multiexciton Auger recombination of CdSeS. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(10): 107801. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190291
[9]	Ye Shu-Ji, Li Chuan-Zhao, Zhang Jia-Hui, Tan Jun-Jun, Luo Yi. Research progress of molecular structure and dynamics of biological water. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(1): 013101. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181273
[10]	Chen Cong, Liang Pan, Hu Rong-Rong, Jia Tian-Qing, Sun Zhen-Rong, Feng Dong-Hai. Pump-orientation-probe technique and its applications. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(9): 097201. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180244
[11]	Jia Yue^1\2, Chen Xiao-Han^1\2, Zhang Hao^1\2, Zhang Lin-Jie^1\2, Xiao Lian-Tuan^1\2, Jia Suo-Tang^1\2. Noise transfer characteristics of Rydberg electromagnetically induced transparency. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(21): 213201. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20181168
[12]	Luo Jin-Long, Ling Feng-Zi, Li Shuai, Wang Yan-Mei, Zhang Bing. Ultrafast photodissociation dynamics of butanone in 3s Rydberg state. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(2): 023301. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.023301
[13]	Yang Zhe, Zhang Xiang, Xiao Si, He Jun, Gu Bing. Ultrafast dynamics of free carriers induced by two-photon excitation in bulk ZnSe crystal. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(17): 177901. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.177901
[14]	Wang Yong, Zhang Hao, Chen Jie, Wang Li-Mei, Zhang Lin-Jie, Li Chang-Yong, Zhao Jian-Ming, Jia Suo-Tang. State transfer of ultracold nS Rydberg atoms. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(9): 093201. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.093201
[15]	Li Xia, Feng Dong-Hai, He Hong-Yan, Jia Tian-Qing, Shan Lu-Fan, Sun Zhen-Rong, Xu Zhi-Zhan. Ultrafast carrier dynamics in CdTe/CdS Core/Shell quantum dots. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(19): 197801. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.197801
[16]	Qin Wen-Jie, Dai Chang-Jian, Zhao Hong-Ying, Xiao Ying. Spectra of Rydberg states of Sm atom measured with autoionization detection method. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(1): 209-214. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.209
[17]	He Li-Ming, Cao Wei, Chen Xue-Qian, Zhu Yun-Xia. Calculation of helium 1D—3D term intervals for　1snd(n=4—11) states. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(11): 5077-5081. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.5077
[18]	Zhu Yun-Xia, He Li-Ming, Cao Wei, Ge Zi-Ming. The magnetic fine structure calculation of helium 10G—10M Rydberg states. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(11): 5082-5088. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.5082
[19]	He Li-Ming, Yang Yue, Lu Hui. Core polarization and the calculation of lifetimes of highs series Rydberg state s of Na atom. Acta Physica Sinica, 2003, 52(6): 1385-1389. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.1385
[20]	DING GANG-JIAN, SHANG REN-CHENG, ZHANG LIAN-FANG, WEN KE-LING, HUI QIN, CHEN DIE-YAN. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF RYDBERG STATES OF AU ATOM. Acta Physica Sinica, 1989, 38(7): 1048-1055. doi: 10.7498/aps.38.1048

Catalog

Vol. 73, Issue 24 - 2024-12-20

Metrics

Abstract views: 286
PDF Downloads: 10
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板