基于石墨烯光力系统的非线性光学效应及非线性光学质量传感

陈华俊

doi:10.7498/aps.69.20191745

摘要

研究了由泵浦光和探测光同时驱动的石墨烯光力系统中的非线性光学现象, 如光学双稳态和四波混频现象. 通过控制泵浦光功率强度和失谐能有效操控光学双稳态. 对石墨烯光力系统中的四波混频研究发现四波混频谱中尖峰的位置正对应石墨烯振子频率的数值, 因此给出一种测量石墨烯振子频率的非线性光学方法. 此外, 基于对石墨烯光力系统中四波混频的研究进一步理论提出一种非线性光学质量传感方案. 通过探测四波混频谱中由于纳米颗粒质量引起的机械共振频移可直接测出沉积在石墨烯振子面上的纳米颗粒的质量. 该非线性光学质量传感方案将对探测噪声免疫, 并且将在高精度及高分辨率质量传感器件方面有着潜在应用.

关键词:

Abstract

Graphene, atomically thin two-dimensional (2D) nanomaterial consisting of a single layer of carbon atoms, has received tremendous attention in the past few decades. Graphene may be considered as an excellent nanomaterial for fabricating nanomechanical resonator systems to investigate the quantum behavior of the motion of micromechanical resonators because of its unique properties of low mass density, high frequency, high quality-factor, and intrinsically small size. Additionally, graphene optomechanics based on a bilayer graphene resonator coupled to a microwave on-chip cavity, where light and micromechanical motion interact via the radiation pressure, has been demonstrtated experimentally recently. In this work, we demonstrate theoretically the nonlinear optical effect including optical bistability and four-wave mixing under the regimes woth different parameters and detunings in a graphene resonator-microwave cavity system. When the graphene optomechanics is driven by one strong pump laser beam, we find that the optical bistability can be controlled by tuning the power and the frequency of the pump beam. The four-wave mixing (FWM) phenomenon is also investigated and we find that sharp peaks in the FWM spectrum exactly are located at the resonant frequency of graphene resonator. Therefore, a straight nonlinear optical means for determining the resonant frequency of the graphene resonator is presented. Setting the cavity field resonating with pump field, and then scanning the probe frequency across the cavity frequency, one can easily and exactly obtain the resonant frequency of the resonator from the FWM spectrum. We further theoretically propose a mass sensor based on the graphene optomechanical system. The mass of external nanoparticles deposited onto the graphene resonator can be measured conveniently by tracking the shift of resonant frequency due to mass changing in the FWM spectrum. Compared with optomechanical mass sensors in linear regime, the nonlinear optical mass sensor may be immune to the detection noise. The system may have potential applications in communication networks for frequency conversion and provide a new platform for high sensitive sensing devices.

Keywords:

作者及机构信息

陈华俊

安徽理工大学力学与光电物理学院, 淮南　232001

通信作者: 陈华俊, chenphysics@126.com

基金项目: 国家级-国家自然科学基金(11647001)

Authors and contacts

Chen Hua-Jun

School of Mechanics and Photoelectric Physics, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China

Corresponding author: Chen Hua-Jun, chenphysics@126.com

文章全文 : translate this paragraph

参考文献

[1]	Chen C, Rosenblatt S, Bolotin K I, Kalb W, Kim P, Kymissis I, Stormer H L, Heinz T F, Hone J 2009 Nat. Nanotechnol. 4 861 Google Scholar
[2]	Eichler A, Moser J, Chaste J, Zdrojek M, Wilson-Rae I, Bachtold A 2011 Nat. Nanotechnol. 6 339 Google Scholar
[3]	Song X, Oksanen M, Sillanpää M A, Craighead H G, Parpia J M, Hakonen P J 2012 Nano. Lett. 12 198 Google Scholar
[4]	Chen C, Lee S, Deshpande V V, Lee G H, Lekas M, Shepard K, Hone J 2013 Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 923 Google Scholar
[5]	Bunch J S, van der Zande A M, Verbridge S S, Frank I W, Tanenbaum D M, Parpia J M, Craighead H G, McEuen P L 2007 Science 315 490 Google Scholar
[6]	Moser J, Güttinger J, Eichler A, Esplandiu M J, Liu D E, Dykman M I, Bachtold A 2013 Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 493 Google Scholar
[7]	Stapfner S, Ost L, Hunger D, Reichel J, Favero I, Weig E M 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 151910 Google Scholar
[8]	Chiu H Y, Hung P, Postma H W C 2008 Nano. Lett. 8 4342 Google Scholar
[9]	Chaste J, Eichler A, Moser J, Ceballos G, Rurali R, Bachtold A A 2012 Nat. Nanotechnol. 7 301 Google Scholar
[10]	Singh V, Sengupta S, Solanki H S, Dhall R, Allain A, Dhara S, Pant P, Deshmukh M M 2010 Nanotechnology 211 65204
[11]	Aspelmeyer M, Kippenberg T J, Marquardt F 2014 Rev. Mod. Phys. 86 1391 Google Scholar
[12]	O’Connell A D, Hofheinz M, Ansmann M, Bialczak R C, Lenander M, Lucero E, Neeley M, Sank D, Wang H, Weides M, Wenner J, Martinis J M, Cleland A N 2010 Nature 464 697 Google Scholar
[13]	Teufel J D, Donner T, Li D, Harlow J W, Allman M S, Cicak K, Sirois A J, Whittaker J D, Lehnert K W, Simmonds R W 2011 Nature 475 359 Google Scholar
[14]	Chan J, Alegre T P M, Safavi-Naeini A H, Hill J T, Krause A, Gröblacher S, Aspelmeyer M, Painter O 2011 Nature 478 89 Google Scholar
[15]	Barton R A, Storch I R, Adiga V P, Sakakibara R, Cipriany B R, Ilic B, Wang S P, Ong P, McEuen P L, Parpia J M, Craighead F G 2012 Nano. Lett. 12 4681 Google Scholar
[16]	Peterson R W, Purdy T P, Kampel N S, Andrews R W, Yu P L, Lehnert K W, Regal C A 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 063601 Google Scholar
[17]	Chen H J 2018 J. Appl. Phys. 124 153102 Google Scholar
[18]	Rossi M, Mason D, Chen J, Tsaturyan Y, Schliesser A 2018 Nature 563 53 Google Scholar
[19]	Grudinin I S, Lee H, Painter O, Vahala K J, 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 083901 Google Scholar
[20]	Jing H, Özdemir S K, Lü X Y, Zhang J, Yang L, Nori F 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 053604 Google Scholar
[21]	Brooks D W C, Botter T, Schreppler S, Purdy T P, Brahms N, Stamper-Kurn D M 2012 Nature 488 476 Google Scholar
[22]	Safavi-Naeini A H, Gröblacher S, Hill J T, Chan J, Aspelmeyer M, Painter O 2013 Nature 500 185 Google Scholar
[23]	Purdy T P, Yu P L, Peterson R W, Kampel N S, Regal C A 2013 Phys. Rev. X 3 031012
[24]	Agarwal G S, Huang S M 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 041803 Google Scholar
[25]	Weis S, Riviere R, Deleglise S, Gavartin E, Arcizet O, Schliesser A, Kippenberg T J 2010 Science 330 1520 Google Scholar
[26]	Teufel J D, Li D, Allman M S, Cicak K, Sirois A J, Whittaker J D, Simmonds R W 2011 Nature 471 204 Google Scholar
[27]	Safavi-Naeini A H, Alegre T P M, Chan J, Eichenfield M, Winger M, Lin Q, Hill J T, Chang D E, Painter O 2011 Nature 472 69 Google Scholar
[28]	Karuza M, Biancofiore C, Bawaj M, Molinelli C, Galassi M, Natali R, Tombesi P, Di Giuseppe G, Vitali D 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 013804 Google Scholar
[29]	Zhou X, Hocke F, Schliesser A, Marx A, Huebl H, Gross R, Kippenberg T J 2013 Nat. Phys. 9 179 Google Scholar
[30]	Fan L, Fong KY, Poot M, Tang H X 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 5850 Google Scholar
[31]	Massel F, Heikkilä T T, Pirkkalainen J M, Cho S U, Saloniemi H, Hakonen P J, Sillanpää M A 2011 Nature 480 351 Google Scholar
[32]	Jing H, Özdemir S K, Lü X Y, Zhang J, Yang L, Nori F 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 053604
[33]	Jiang Y, Maayani S, Carmon T, Nori F, Jing H 2018 Phys. Rev. Appl. 10 064037 Google Scholar
[34]	Jiao Y, Lü H, Qian J, Li Y, Jing H 2016 New J. Phys. 18 083034 Google Scholar
[35]	Lu T X, Jiao Y F, Zhang H L, Saif F, Jing H 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 013813 Google Scholar
[36]	Zhang H, Saif F, Jiao Y, Jing H 2018 Opt. Express 26 25199 Google Scholar
[37]	Jiao Y F, Lu T X, Jing H 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 013843 Google Scholar
[38]	Lü H, Özdemir S K, Kuang L M, Nori F, Jing H 2017 Phys. Rev. Appl. 8 044020 Google Scholar
[39]	Lü H, Wang C, Yang L, Jing H 2018 Phys. Rev. Appl. 10 014006 Google Scholar
[40]	Li B, Huang R, Xu X, Miranowicz A, Jing H 2019 Photonics Res. 7 630 Google Scholar
[41]	Weber P, Guttinger J, Tsioutsios I, Chang D E, Bachtold A 2014 Nano. Lett. 14 2854 Google Scholar
[42]	Singh V, Bosman S J, Schneider B H, Blanter Y M, Castellanos-Gomez A, Steele G A 2014 Nat. Nanotechnol. 9 820 Google Scholar
[43]	Song X, Oksanen M, Li J, Hakonen P J, Sillanpää M A 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 027404 Google Scholar
[44]	Chen B, Jiang C, Zhu K D 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 055803 Google Scholar
[45]	Chen B, Jiang C, Li J J, Zhu K D 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 055802 Google Scholar
[46]	Sete E A, Eleuch H 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 043824 Google Scholar
[47]	Kanamoto R, Meystre P 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 063601 Google Scholar
[48]	Purdy T P, Brooks. D W C, Botter T, Brahms N, Ma Z Y, Stamper-Kurn D M 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 133602 Google Scholar
[49]	Yan D, Wang Z H, Ren C N, Gao H, Li Y, Wu J H 2015 Phys. Rev. A 91 023813 Google Scholar
[50]	Xiong W, Jin D Y, Qiu Y, Lam C H, You J Q 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 023844 Google Scholar
[51]	Huang S, Agarwal G S 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 033830 Google Scholar
[52]	Jiang C, Cui Y, Liu H 2013 Europhys. Lett. 104 34004 Google Scholar
[53]	严晓波, 杨柳, 田雪冬, 刘一谋, 张岩 2014 物理学报 63 204201 Google Scholar Yan X B, Yang L, Tian X D, Liu Y M, Zhang Y 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 204201 Google Scholar
[54]	陈雪, 刘晓威, 张可烨, 袁春华, 张卫平 2015 物理学报 64 164211 Google Scholar Chen X, Liu X W, Zhang K Y, Yuan C H, Zhang W P 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 164211 Google Scholar
[55]	Liu Y C, Hu Y W, Wong C W, Xiao Y F 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 114213 Google Scholar
[56]	Liu Y L, Wang C, Zhang J, Liu Y X 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 024204 Google Scholar
[57]	Dobrindt J M, Kippenberg T J 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 033901 Google Scholar
[58]	Aspelmeyer M, Kippenberg T J, Marquardt F 2014 Rev. Mod. Phys. 86 1391
[59]	Ekinci K L, Yang Y T, Roukes M L 2004 J. Appl. Phys. 95 2682 Google Scholar
[60]	Yie Z, Zielke M A, Burgner C B, Turner K L 2011 J. Micromech. Microeng. 21 025027 Google Scholar
[61]	Ramos D, Mertens J, Calleja M, Tamayo J 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 173108 Google Scholar
[62]	Dai M D, Eom K, Kim C W 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 203104 Google Scholar
[63]	Li J J, Zhu K.D 2013 Phys. Rep. 525 223 Google Scholar
[64]	陈华俊, 方贤文, 陈昌兆, 李洋 2016 物理学报 65 194205 Google Scholar Chen H J, Fang X W, Chen C Z, Li Y 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 194205 Google Scholar
[65]	Chen H J, Chen C Z, Li Y, Fang X W, Tang X D 2017 Opt. Commun. 382 73 Google Scholar

施引文献

图 1 石墨烯光力系统与非线性质量传感示意图, 其中该系统由一束频率为${\omega _{\rm{p}}}$的泵浦光和一束频率${\omega _{\rm{s}}}$的信号光驱动

Fig. 1. Schematic of graphene optomechanical system and nonlinear optical mass sensor driven by a strong pump field ${\omega _{\rm{p}}}$ and a weak signal field ${\omega _{\rm{s}}}$.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 在三个不同泵浦功率条件下石墨烯光力腔内光子数作为腔-泵浦失谐${\varDelta _{\rm{p}}}$的函数

Fig. 2. Mean intracavity photon number of graphene optomechanical cavity as a function of the cavity-pump detuning ${\varDelta _{\rm{p}}}$ with four pump powers.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 (a)在失谐${\varDelta _{\rm{p}}} = {\omega _{\rm{m}}}$时, 腔内光子数${n_{\rm{c}}}$作为泵浦功率P的函数; (b) 在失谐${\varDelta _{\rm{p}}} = - {\omega _{\rm{m}}}$时, 腔内光子数${n_{\rm{c}}}$作为泵浦功率P的函数

Fig. 3. (a) The mean intracavity photon number ${n_{\rm{c}}}$ as a function of P for ${\varDelta _{\rm{p}}} = {\omega _{\rm{m}}}$; (b) mean intracavity photon number ${n_{\rm{c}}}$ as a function of P for ${\varDelta _{\rm{p}}} = - {\omega _{\rm{m}}}$.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 (a) 在四个不同石墨烯振子频率时, 四波混频谱FWM作为探测-腔失谐${\varDelta _{\rm{s}}}$的函数; (b) 和 (c)分别是左边和右边尖峰的放大

Fig. 4. (a) The four-wave mixing (FWM) spectrum as a function of probe-cavity detuning ${\varDelta _{\rm{s}}}$ under four different graphene resonator frequencies; (b) and (c) are the amplifications of the left and right peaks.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 当把纳米颗粒沉积到石墨烯振子表面上时, 四波混频谱的频移. 插图是纳米颗粒的质量与频移之间的线性关系

Fig. 5. The four-wave mixing (FWM) spectrum after landing the nanoparticles on the surface of graphene resonator and the color curves shows the mechanical frequency-shifts. The inset shows the linear relationship between the frequency-shifts and the mass of the nanoparticles.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

[1]	Chen C, Rosenblatt S, Bolotin K I, Kalb W, Kim P, Kymissis I, Stormer H L, Heinz T F, Hone J 2009 Nat. Nanotechnol. 4 861 Google Scholar
[2]	Eichler A, Moser J, Chaste J, Zdrojek M, Wilson-Rae I, Bachtold A 2011 Nat. Nanotechnol. 6 339 Google Scholar
[3]	Song X, Oksanen M, Sillanpää M A, Craighead H G, Parpia J M, Hakonen P J 2012 Nano. Lett. 12 198 Google Scholar
[4]	Chen C, Lee S, Deshpande V V, Lee G H, Lekas M, Shepard K, Hone J 2013 Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 923 Google Scholar
[5]	Bunch J S, van der Zande A M, Verbridge S S, Frank I W, Tanenbaum D M, Parpia J M, Craighead H G, McEuen P L 2007 Science 315 490 Google Scholar
[6]	Moser J, Güttinger J, Eichler A, Esplandiu M J, Liu D E, Dykman M I, Bachtold A 2013 Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 493 Google Scholar
[7]	Stapfner S, Ost L, Hunger D, Reichel J, Favero I, Weig E M 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 151910 Google Scholar
[8]	Chiu H Y, Hung P, Postma H W C 2008 Nano. Lett. 8 4342 Google Scholar
[9]	Chaste J, Eichler A, Moser J, Ceballos G, Rurali R, Bachtold A A 2012 Nat. Nanotechnol. 7 301 Google Scholar
[10]	Singh V, Sengupta S, Solanki H S, Dhall R, Allain A, Dhara S, Pant P, Deshmukh M M 2010 Nanotechnology 211 65204
[11]	Aspelmeyer M, Kippenberg T J, Marquardt F 2014 Rev. Mod. Phys. 86 1391 Google Scholar
[12]	O’Connell A D, Hofheinz M, Ansmann M, Bialczak R C, Lenander M, Lucero E, Neeley M, Sank D, Wang H, Weides M, Wenner J, Martinis J M, Cleland A N 2010 Nature 464 697 Google Scholar
[13]	Teufel J D, Donner T, Li D, Harlow J W, Allman M S, Cicak K, Sirois A J, Whittaker J D, Lehnert K W, Simmonds R W 2011 Nature 475 359 Google Scholar
[14]	Chan J, Alegre T P M, Safavi-Naeini A H, Hill J T, Krause A, Gröblacher S, Aspelmeyer M, Painter O 2011 Nature 478 89 Google Scholar
[15]	Barton R A, Storch I R, Adiga V P, Sakakibara R, Cipriany B R, Ilic B, Wang S P, Ong P, McEuen P L, Parpia J M, Craighead F G 2012 Nano. Lett. 12 4681 Google Scholar
[16]	Peterson R W, Purdy T P, Kampel N S, Andrews R W, Yu P L, Lehnert K W, Regal C A 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 063601 Google Scholar
[17]	Chen H J 2018 J. Appl. Phys. 124 153102 Google Scholar
[18]	Rossi M, Mason D, Chen J, Tsaturyan Y, Schliesser A 2018 Nature 563 53 Google Scholar
[19]	Grudinin I S, Lee H, Painter O, Vahala K J, 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 083901 Google Scholar
[20]	Jing H, Özdemir S K, Lü X Y, Zhang J, Yang L, Nori F 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 053604 Google Scholar
[21]	Brooks D W C, Botter T, Schreppler S, Purdy T P, Brahms N, Stamper-Kurn D M 2012 Nature 488 476 Google Scholar
[22]	Safavi-Naeini A H, Gröblacher S, Hill J T, Chan J, Aspelmeyer M, Painter O 2013 Nature 500 185 Google Scholar
[23]	Purdy T P, Yu P L, Peterson R W, Kampel N S, Regal C A 2013 Phys. Rev. X 3 031012
[24]	Agarwal G S, Huang S M 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 041803 Google Scholar
[25]	Weis S, Riviere R, Deleglise S, Gavartin E, Arcizet O, Schliesser A, Kippenberg T J 2010 Science 330 1520 Google Scholar
[26]	Teufel J D, Li D, Allman M S, Cicak K, Sirois A J, Whittaker J D, Simmonds R W 2011 Nature 471 204 Google Scholar
[27]	Safavi-Naeini A H, Alegre T P M, Chan J, Eichenfield M, Winger M, Lin Q, Hill J T, Chang D E, Painter O 2011 Nature 472 69 Google Scholar
[28]	Karuza M, Biancofiore C, Bawaj M, Molinelli C, Galassi M, Natali R, Tombesi P, Di Giuseppe G, Vitali D 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 013804 Google Scholar
[29]	Zhou X, Hocke F, Schliesser A, Marx A, Huebl H, Gross R, Kippenberg T J 2013 Nat. Phys. 9 179 Google Scholar
[30]	Fan L, Fong KY, Poot M, Tang H X 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 5850 Google Scholar
[31]	Massel F, Heikkilä T T, Pirkkalainen J M, Cho S U, Saloniemi H, Hakonen P J, Sillanpää M A 2011 Nature 480 351 Google Scholar
[32]	Jing H, Özdemir S K, Lü X Y, Zhang J, Yang L, Nori F 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 053604
[33]	Jiang Y, Maayani S, Carmon T, Nori F, Jing H 2018 Phys. Rev. Appl. 10 064037 Google Scholar
[34]	Jiao Y, Lü H, Qian J, Li Y, Jing H 2016 New J. Phys. 18 083034 Google Scholar
[35]	Lu T X, Jiao Y F, Zhang H L, Saif F, Jing H 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 013813 Google Scholar
[36]	Zhang H, Saif F, Jiao Y, Jing H 2018 Opt. Express 26 25199 Google Scholar
[37]	Jiao Y F, Lu T X, Jing H 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 013843 Google Scholar
[38]	Lü H, Özdemir S K, Kuang L M, Nori F, Jing H 2017 Phys. Rev. Appl. 8 044020 Google Scholar
[39]	Lü H, Wang C, Yang L, Jing H 2018 Phys. Rev. Appl. 10 014006 Google Scholar
[40]	Li B, Huang R, Xu X, Miranowicz A, Jing H 2019 Photonics Res. 7 630 Google Scholar
[41]	Weber P, Guttinger J, Tsioutsios I, Chang D E, Bachtold A 2014 Nano. Lett. 14 2854 Google Scholar
[42]	Singh V, Bosman S J, Schneider B H, Blanter Y M, Castellanos-Gomez A, Steele G A 2014 Nat. Nanotechnol. 9 820 Google Scholar
[43]	Song X, Oksanen M, Li J, Hakonen P J, Sillanpää M A 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 027404 Google Scholar
[44]	Chen B, Jiang C, Zhu K D 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 055803 Google Scholar
[45]	Chen B, Jiang C, Li J J, Zhu K D 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 055802 Google Scholar
[46]	Sete E A, Eleuch H 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 043824 Google Scholar
[47]	Kanamoto R, Meystre P 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 063601 Google Scholar
[48]	Purdy T P, Brooks. D W C, Botter T, Brahms N, Ma Z Y, Stamper-Kurn D M 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 133602 Google Scholar
[49]	Yan D, Wang Z H, Ren C N, Gao H, Li Y, Wu J H 2015 Phys. Rev. A 91 023813 Google Scholar
[50]	Xiong W, Jin D Y, Qiu Y, Lam C H, You J Q 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 023844 Google Scholar
[51]	Huang S, Agarwal G S 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 033830 Google Scholar
[52]	Jiang C, Cui Y, Liu H 2013 Europhys. Lett. 104 34004 Google Scholar
[53]	严晓波, 杨柳, 田雪冬, 刘一谋, 张岩 2014 物理学报 63 204201 Google Scholar Yan X B, Yang L, Tian X D, Liu Y M, Zhang Y 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 204201 Google Scholar
[54]	陈雪, 刘晓威, 张可烨, 袁春华, 张卫平 2015 物理学报 64 164211 Google Scholar Chen X, Liu X W, Zhang K Y, Yuan C H, Zhang W P 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 164211 Google Scholar
[55]	Liu Y C, Hu Y W, Wong C W, Xiao Y F 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 114213 Google Scholar
[56]	Liu Y L, Wang C, Zhang J, Liu Y X 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 024204 Google Scholar
[57]	Dobrindt J M, Kippenberg T J 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 033901 Google Scholar
[58]	Aspelmeyer M, Kippenberg T J, Marquardt F 2014 Rev. Mod. Phys. 86 1391
[59]	Ekinci K L, Yang Y T, Roukes M L 2004 J. Appl. Phys. 95 2682 Google Scholar
[60]	Yie Z, Zielke M A, Burgner C B, Turner K L 2011 J. Micromech. Microeng. 21 025027 Google Scholar
[61]	Ramos D, Mertens J, Calleja M, Tamayo J 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 173108 Google Scholar
[62]	Dai M D, Eom K, Kim C W 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 203104 Google Scholar
[63]	Li J J, Zhu K.D 2013 Phys. Rep. 525 223 Google Scholar
[64]	陈华俊, 方贤文, 陈昌兆, 李洋 2016 物理学报 65 194205 Google Scholar Chen H J, Fang X W, Chen C Z, Li Y 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 194205 Google Scholar
[65]	Chen H J, Chen C Z, Li Y, Fang X W, Tang X D 2017 Opt. Commun. 382 73 Google Scholar

[1]	胡生润, 季学强, 王进进, 阎结昀, 张天悦, 李培刚. 基于Ga₂O₃-SiC-Ag多层结构的介电常数近零超低开关阈值光学双稳态器件. 物理学报, 2024, 73(5): 054201. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231534
[2]	盖云冉, 郑康, 丁春玲, 郝向英, 金锐博. 基于半导体量子阱中四波混频效应的高效光学非互易. 物理学报, 2024, 73(1): 014201. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231212
[3]	李昀衡, 喻可, 朱天宇, 于桐, 单思超, 谷亚舟, 李志曈. 拓扑层结构中的光学双稳态及其在光神经网络中的应用. 物理学报, 2024, 73(16): 164208. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240569
[4]	姜阳阳, 夏晓霜, 李建波. 双层石墨烯薄膜体系中的四波混频特性. 物理学报, 2023, 72(12): 126801. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230012
[5]	曹雷明, 杜金鉴, 张凯, 刘胜帅, 荆杰泰. 基于四波混频过程产生介于锥形探针光和锥形共轭光之间的多模量子关联. 物理学报, 2022, 71(16): 160306. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220081
[6]	徐笑吟, 刘胜帅, 荆杰泰. 基于四波混频过程的纠缠光放大. 物理学报, 2022, 71(5): 050301. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211324
[7]	Xiaoyin Xu, shengshuai liu, 荆杰泰. 基于四波混频过程的纠缠光放大. 物理学报, 2021, (): . doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211324
[8]	仲银银, 潘晓州, 荆杰泰. 级联四波混频相干反馈控制系统量子纠缠特性. 物理学报, 2020, 69(13): 130301. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200042
[9]	杨荣国, 张超霞, 李妮, 张静, 郜江瑞. 级联四波混频系统中纠缠增强的量子操控. 物理学报, 2019, 68(9): 094205. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181837
[10]	杨建勇, 陈华俊. 基于超强耦合量子点-纳米机械振子系统的全光学质量传感. 物理学报, 2019, 68(24): 246302. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190607
[11]	曹亚敏, 武保剑, 万峰, 邱昆. 四波混频光相位运算器原理及其噪声性能研究. 物理学报, 2018, 67(9): 094208. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172638
[12]	董丽娟, 薛春华, 孙勇, 邓富胜, 石云龙. 单负材料异质结构中损耗诱导的场局域增强和光学双稳态. 物理学报, 2016, 65(11): 114207. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.114207
[13]	陈华俊, 方贤文, 陈昌兆, 李洋. 基于双回音壁模式腔光力学系统的光学传播特性和超高分辨率光学质量传感. 物理学报, 2016, 65(19): 194205. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.194205
[14]	杨金金, 李慧军, 文文, 黄国翔. n型主动拉曼增益原子介质中的光学双稳态. 物理学报, 2012, 61(22): 224204. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.224204
[15]	刘均海, 万勇, 韩文娟, 杨红卫, 张怀金, 王继扬, Petrov Valentin. 掺Yb钒酸盐晶体激光振荡中的光学双稳态现象研究. 物理学报, 2010, 59(1): 293-299. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.293
[16]	尹经禅, 肖晓晟, 杨昌喜. 基于光纤四波混频波长转换和色散的慢光实验研究. 物理学报, 2010, 59(6): 3986-3991. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.3986
[17]	杨永明, 许启明, 张彦鹏. N5B五能级系统中重复缀饰四波混频研究. 物理学报, 2009, 58(1): 290-297. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.290
[18]	李培丽, 黄德修, 张新亮. 基于PolSK调制的四波混频型超快全光译码器. 物理学报, 2009, 58(3): 1785-1792. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.1785
[19]	毛庆和, 冯素娟, 蒋建, 朱宗玖, 刘文清. 基于FLM的L波段双波长EDFL的双稳态变换. 物理学报, 2007, 56(1): 296-300. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.296
[20]	陈峻, 刘正东, 尤素萍. 准Λ型四能级原子系统中的烧孔和光学双稳现象. 物理学报, 2006, 55(12): 6410-6413. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.6410

计量

文章访问数: 6619
PDF下载量: 144
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板

基于石墨烯光力系统的非线性光学效应及非线性光学质量传感