-
局部有源忆阻器(locally-active memristor, LAM)凭借其高集成度、低功耗和局部有源特性等优点, 在神经形态计算领域显示出巨大的潜力. 本文提出了一种简单的N型LAM数学模型, 通过揭示其非线性动力特性, 设计了N型LAM神经元电路. 采用Hopf分岔、数值分析等方法定量研究了该电路的动力学行为, 成功模拟了多种神经形态行为, 包括全或无行为、尖峰、簇发、周期振荡等. 并利用该神经元电路结构模拟了生物触觉神经元的频率特性. 仿真结果表明: 当输入信号幅值低于阈值时, 神经元电路输出信号的振荡频率与输入信号强度呈正相关(即兴奋状态), 并在阈值处达到最大值. 随后, 继续增大激励强度, 振荡频率则逐渐降低(即保护性抑制状态). 最后, 设计了N型LAM硬件仿真器, 并完成了人工神经元电路的硬件实现, 实验结果与仿真结果、理论分析相一致, 验证了该N型LAM具备的神经形态行为.Owing to the advantages of high integration, low power consumption and locally active characteristics, locally-active memristor (LAM) has shown great potential applications in neuromorphic computing. To further investigate the neuromorphic dynamics of LAMs, a simple N-type LAM mathematical model is proposed in this work. By analyzing its voltage-current characteristic and small-signal equivalent circuit, a neuron circuit based on the N-type LAM is designed, where a variety of neuromorphic behaviors are successfully simulated, such as “all-or-nothing” behavior, spikes, bursting, periodic oscillation, etc. Moreover, Hopf bifurcation theory and numerical analysis method are used to study the dynamics of the circuit quantitatively. Then, an artificial tactile neuron and its frequency characteristics are presented by using the proposed neuron circuit topology. The simulation results show that when the amplitude of the input signal is lower than the threshold, the oscillation frequency of the output signal of the artificial neuron circuit is positively correlated with the intensity of the input signal, and reaches a maximum value at the threshold. The above frequency characteristics are consistent with those of the exciting state of biological sensory system. Subsequently, if the incentive intensity continues to increase, the oscillation frequency will gradually decrease, corresponding to the protective inhibition behavior. Finally, the physical circuit of the N-type LAM, and artificialneuron circuit are realized. The experimental results accord well with the simulation results and theoreticalanalyses, manifesting the practicability of the N-type LAM model and the feasibility of artificial neuron circuit.
-
Keywords:
- memristor /
- local activity /
- neuromorphic /
- Hopf bifurcation /
- hardware implementation
[1] Moore G E 1998 Proc. IEEE 86 82
Google Scholar
[2] Backus J 1978 Commun. ACM. 21 613
Google Scholar
[3] Zhao Y, Liu B, Yang J, He J, Jiang J 2020 Chin. Phys. Lett. 37 088501
Google Scholar
[4] Chen Y-B, Yang X-K, Yan T, Wei B, Cui H-Q, Li C, Cai L 2020 Chin. Phys. Lett. 37 078501
Google Scholar
[5] Kumar S, Williams R S, Wang Z 2020 Nature 585 518
[6] Maass W 1997 Neural. Netw. 10 659
Google Scholar
[7] Merolla P A, Arthur J V, Alvarez-Icaza R, et al. 2014 Science 345 668
Google Scholar
[8] Davies M, Srinivasa N, Lin T H, et al. 2018 IEEE Micro. 38 82
Google Scholar
[9] Indiveri G, Linares-Barranco B, Hamilton T J, et al. 2011 Front. Neurosci. 5 73
Google Scholar
[10] Kim H, Hwang S, Park J, Yun S, Lee J H, Park B G 2018 IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 39 630
Google Scholar
[11] Wang W, Pedretti G, Milo V, Carboni R, Calderoni A, Ramaswamy N, Spinelli A S, Ielmini D 2018 Sci. Adv. 4 eaat4752
Google Scholar
[12] Prezioso M, Mahmoodi M R, Bayat F M, Nili H, Kim H, Vincent A, Strukov D B 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 5311
Google Scholar
[13] Wang Z, Joshi S, Savel’ev S, et al. 2018 Nat. Electron. 1 137
Google Scholar
[14] Roy K, Jaiswal A, Panda P 2019 Nature 575 607
Google Scholar
[15] Wang M, Cai S, Pan C, Wang C, Lian X, Zhuo Y, Xu K, Cao T, Pan X, Wang B, Liang S J, Yang J J, Wang P, Miao F 2018 Nat. Electron. 1 130
Google Scholar
[16] Pickett M D, Williams R S 2012 Nanotechnology 23 215202
Google Scholar
[17] Choi S, Tan S H., Li Z, Kim Y, Choi C, Chen P Y, Yeon H, Yu S, Kim J 2018 Nat. Mater. 17 335
Google Scholar
[18] Li C, Hu M, Li Y, et al. 2018 Nat. Electron. 1 52
Google Scholar
[19] Hu M, Graves C E, Li C, Li Y, Ge N, Montgomery E, Davila N, Jiang H, Williams R S, Yang J J, Xia Q, Strachan J P 2018 Adv. Mater. 30 1705914
Google Scholar
[20] Valov I, Linn E, Tappertzhofen S, Schmelzer S, van den Hurk J, Lentz F, Waser R 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 1771
Google Scholar
[21] Wang Z, Rao M, Han J W, et al. 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 3208
Google Scholar
[22] Yang Y, Gao P, Li L, Pan X, Tappertzhofen S, Choi S, Waser R, valov I, Lu W D. 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 4232
Google Scholar
[23] Liang Y, Wang G, Chen G, Dong Y, Yu D, Iu H H C 2020 IEEE Trans. Circuits. Syst. I. Regul. Pap. 67 5139
Google Scholar
[24] Li C, Wang Z, Rao M, Belkin D, Song W, Jiang H, Yan P, Li Y, Lin P, Hu M, Ge N, Stranchan J P, Barnell M, Wu Q, Williams R S, Yang J J, Xia Q 2019 Nat. Mach. Intell. 1 49
Google Scholar
[25] Li C, Belkin D, Li Y, Yan P, Hu M, Ge N, Jiang H, Montgomery E, Lin P, Wang Z, Song W, Strachan J P, Barnell M, Wu Q, Williams R S, Yang J J, Xia Q 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 2385
Google Scholar
[26] Zhang C, Chen Y, Yi M, Zhu Y, Li T, Liu L, Wang L, Xie L, Huang W 2018 Sci. Sin. Inform. 48 115
Google Scholar
[27] Chua L O 2005 Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos. 15 3435
Google Scholar
[28] Mainzer K, Chua L O 2013 Local Activity Principle (London: Imperial College Press)
[29] Midya R, Wang Z, Asapu S, Joshi S, Li Y, Zhuo Y, Song W, Jiang H, Upadhay N, Rao M, Lin P, Li C, Xia Q, Yang J J 2019 Adv. Electron. Mater. 5 1900060
Google Scholar
[30] Zhu J, Wu Z, Zhang X, Wang Y, Lu J, Chen P, Cheng L, Shi T, Liu Q 2021 5th IEEE Electron Devices Technology & Manufacturing Conference Chengdu, China, March 9–12, 2021 pp1–3
[31] Al-Shedivat M, Naous R, Cauwenberghs G, Salama K N 2015 IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Topic. Power Electon. 5 242
Google Scholar
[32] Zhang X, Zhuo Y, Luo Q, Wu Z, Midya R, Wang Z, Song W, Wang R, Upadhyay N K, Fang Y, Kiani F, Rao M, Yang Y, Xia Q, Liu Q, Liu M, Yang J J 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 51
Google Scholar
[33] Chua L O 2011 Appl. Phys. A 102 765
Google Scholar
[34] Liang Y, Lu Z, Wang G, Dong Y, Yu D, Iu H H C 2020 IEEE Access 8 75571
Google Scholar
-
图 1 N型LAM不同频率下的捏滞回环曲线
Fig. 1. Pinch hysteresis loop curves of the N-type LAM under different frequencies.
图 5 (a) 在VD = 3 V且30 mH ≤ L ≤ 600 mH范围下, 雅可比矩阵特征值的轨迹; (b) 逐步增大电感, 人工神经元电路可振荡条件下, VD范围变化趋势
Fig. 5. (a) The trajectory of the Jacobian matrix eigenvalues with VD = 3 V and 30 mH ≤ L ≤ 600 mH; (b) with the artificial neuron circuit can oscillate, the VD range changes trend whereas the inductance increase gradually.
图 6 不同直流激励选择下, 逐步增大电感时振荡频率变化曲线 (a) VD = 2.5 V; (b) VD = 2.8 V; (c) VD = 3.0 V; (d) VD = 3.5 V
Fig. 6. The oscillation frequency change curves when the inductance is gradually increased under different DC excitations: (a) VD = 2.5 V; (b) VD = 2.8 V; (c) VD = 3.0 V; (d) VD = 3.5 V.
图 7 N型LAM神经元电路的“全或无”行为
Fig. 7. The “all-or-nothing” behavior of N-type LAM neuron circuit.
图 8 不同占空比的脉冲激励下, 神经元电路的发放行为波形 (a)占空比 = 0.01; (b)占空比 = 0.1; (c)占空比 = 0.4; (d)占空比 = 0.6; (e)占空比 = 0.8; (f)占空比 = 1.0
Fig. 8. The firing behavior waveforms of the neuron circuit under pulse excitation with different duty ratios: (a) Duty ratio = 0.01; (b) duty ratio = 0. 1; (c) duty ratio = 0.4; (d) duty ratio = 0.6; (e) duty ratio = 0.8; (f) duty ratio = 1.0.
图 9 (a)生物感受系统结构示意图; (b)基于N型LAM的人工触觉神经元结构图
Fig. 9. (a) Schematic diagram of the biological sensor system; (b) the structure diagram of the artificial tactile neuron based on the N-type LAM.
图 10 L = 300 mH时, 不同直流激励下人工神经元电路中N型LAM两端电压v的瞬时时域波形
Fig. 10. The instantaneous time-domain waveforms of the voltage across the N-type LAM in the artificial neuron circuit under different DC excitations with L = 300 mH.
图 11 不同电感下, 递增直流电压下振荡频率变化曲线 (a) L = 300 mH; (b) L = 500 mH
Fig. 11. Oscillation frequency varies as a function of DC voltage under different inductances: (a) L = 300 mH; (b) L = 500 mH.
图 12 (a) 基于N型LAM的硬件仿真器原理图; (b) 实验设备图
Fig. 12. (a) Schematic diagram of hardware emulatorof the N-type LAM; (b) diagram of experimental equipments.
图 13 (a) 实验测量N型LAM硬件仿真器的DC V-I特性曲线; (b) 实验测量N型LAM硬件仿真器电导变化曲线
Fig. 13. (a) Experimental measurement of the DC V-I characteristics curve of the N-type LAM hardware emulator; (b) experimental measurement of the conductance change curve of the N-type LAM hardware emulator.
图 15 实验测量得到人工神经元的“全或无”行为
Fig. 15. Experimentally measured the “all-or-nothing” behavior of artificial neuron emulator.
图 16 增大脉冲宽度, 实验测得神经元的发放行为波形 (a)占空比为0.15; (b)占空比为0.40; (c)占空比为0.65; (d)占空比为0.85
Fig. 16. Increasing the pulse width, the experimentally measured neuron firing behavior waveforms: (a) Duty ratio is 0.15; (b) duty ratio is 0.40; (c) duty ratio is 0.65; (d) duty ratio is 0.85.
图 17 直流偏置VD = 3 V时, 不同电感选择下实验测得人工神经元电路输出v的瞬时时域波形 (a) L = 30 mH; (b) L = 39 mH; (c) L = 47 mH; (d) L = 100 mH; (e) L = 200 mH; (f) L = 300 mH
Fig. 17. The experimentally measured instantaneous time-domain waveforms of the artificial neuron circuit output v under different inductances with the DC bias VD = 3 V: (a) L = 30 mH; (b) L = 39 mH; (c) L = 47 mH ; (d) L = 100 mH; (e) L = 200 mH; (f) L = 300 mH
图 18 电感L = 300 mH时, 不同直流偏置选择下实验测得N型LAM两端电压v的瞬时时域波形 (a) VD = 2.5 V; (b) VD = 2.8 V; (c) VD = 3.5 V; (d) VD = 4.0 V; (e) VD = 4.4 V; (f) VD = 4.8 V
Fig. 18. The instantaneous time-domain waveforms of the voltage v across the N-type LAM measured under different DC bias selections with the inductance L = 300 mH: (a) VD = 2.5 V; (b) VD = 2.8 V; (c) VD = 3.5 V; (d) VD = 4.0 V; (e) VD = 4.4 V; (f) VD = 4.8 V
图 19 两种电感选择下, 递增直流激励实验测得v的频率变化曲线 (a) L = 330 mH; (b) L = 470 mH
Fig. 19. The experimentally measured frequency characteristics increasing the DC excitation gradually under two different inductances: (a) L = 330 mH; (b) L = 470 mH.
表 1 硬件电路参数数值
Table 1. Hardware circuit parameter value.
参数 取值 参数 取值 参数 取值 参数 取值 VCC,Vs/V +15 Ri2/kΩ 40 Rd1/kΩ 2.5 Rin/kΩ 1 VEE/V –15 Rx/kΩ 10 Rd0/kΩ 62.5 Ci/nF 1 Ri1/kΩ 44.44 Rp/kΩ 50 Rw,Rz/kΩ 5 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Moore G E 1998 Proc. IEEE 86 82
Google Scholar
[2] Backus J 1978 Commun. ACM. 21 613
Google Scholar
[3] Zhao Y, Liu B, Yang J, He J, Jiang J 2020 Chin. Phys. Lett. 37 088501
Google Scholar
[4] Chen Y-B, Yang X-K, Yan T, Wei B, Cui H-Q, Li C, Cai L 2020 Chin. Phys. Lett. 37 078501
Google Scholar
[5] Kumar S, Williams R S, Wang Z 2020 Nature 585 518
[6] Maass W 1997 Neural. Netw. 10 659
Google Scholar
[7] Merolla P A, Arthur J V, Alvarez-Icaza R, et al. 2014 Science 345 668
Google Scholar
[8] Davies M, Srinivasa N, Lin T H, et al. 2018 IEEE Micro. 38 82
Google Scholar
[9] Indiveri G, Linares-Barranco B, Hamilton T J, et al. 2011 Front. Neurosci. 5 73
Google Scholar
[10] Kim H, Hwang S, Park J, Yun S, Lee J H, Park B G 2018 IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 39 630
Google Scholar
[11] Wang W, Pedretti G, Milo V, Carboni R, Calderoni A, Ramaswamy N, Spinelli A S, Ielmini D 2018 Sci. Adv. 4 eaat4752
Google Scholar
[12] Prezioso M, Mahmoodi M R, Bayat F M, Nili H, Kim H, Vincent A, Strukov D B 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 5311
Google Scholar
[13] Wang Z, Joshi S, Savel’ev S, et al. 2018 Nat. Electron. 1 137
Google Scholar
[14] Roy K, Jaiswal A, Panda P 2019 Nature 575 607
Google Scholar
[15] Wang M, Cai S, Pan C, Wang C, Lian X, Zhuo Y, Xu K, Cao T, Pan X, Wang B, Liang S J, Yang J J, Wang P, Miao F 2018 Nat. Electron. 1 130
Google Scholar
[16] Pickett M D, Williams R S 2012 Nanotechnology 23 215202
Google Scholar
[17] Choi S, Tan S H., Li Z, Kim Y, Choi C, Chen P Y, Yeon H, Yu S, Kim J 2018 Nat. Mater. 17 335
Google Scholar
[18] Li C, Hu M, Li Y, et al. 2018 Nat. Electron. 1 52
Google Scholar
[19] Hu M, Graves C E, Li C, Li Y, Ge N, Montgomery E, Davila N, Jiang H, Williams R S, Yang J J, Xia Q, Strachan J P 2018 Adv. Mater. 30 1705914
Google Scholar
[20] Valov I, Linn E, Tappertzhofen S, Schmelzer S, van den Hurk J, Lentz F, Waser R 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 1771
Google Scholar
[21] Wang Z, Rao M, Han J W, et al. 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 3208
Google Scholar
[22] Yang Y, Gao P, Li L, Pan X, Tappertzhofen S, Choi S, Waser R, valov I, Lu W D. 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 4232
Google Scholar
[23] Liang Y, Wang G, Chen G, Dong Y, Yu D, Iu H H C 2020 IEEE Trans. Circuits. Syst. I. Regul. Pap. 67 5139
Google Scholar
[24] Li C, Wang Z, Rao M, Belkin D, Song W, Jiang H, Yan P, Li Y, Lin P, Hu M, Ge N, Stranchan J P, Barnell M, Wu Q, Williams R S, Yang J J, Xia Q 2019 Nat. Mach. Intell. 1 49
Google Scholar
[25] Li C, Belkin D, Li Y, Yan P, Hu M, Ge N, Jiang H, Montgomery E, Lin P, Wang Z, Song W, Strachan J P, Barnell M, Wu Q, Williams R S, Yang J J, Xia Q 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 2385
Google Scholar
[26] Zhang C, Chen Y, Yi M, Zhu Y, Li T, Liu L, Wang L, Xie L, Huang W 2018 Sci. Sin. Inform. 48 115
Google Scholar
[27] Chua L O 2005 Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos. 15 3435
Google Scholar
[28] Mainzer K, Chua L O 2013 Local Activity Principle (London: Imperial College Press)
[29] Midya R, Wang Z, Asapu S, Joshi S, Li Y, Zhuo Y, Song W, Jiang H, Upadhay N, Rao M, Lin P, Li C, Xia Q, Yang J J 2019 Adv. Electron. Mater. 5 1900060
Google Scholar
[30] Zhu J, Wu Z, Zhang X, Wang Y, Lu J, Chen P, Cheng L, Shi T, Liu Q 2021 5th IEEE Electron Devices Technology & Manufacturing Conference Chengdu, China, March 9–12, 2021 pp1–3
[31] Al-Shedivat M, Naous R, Cauwenberghs G, Salama K N 2015 IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Topic. Power Electon. 5 242
Google Scholar
[32] Zhang X, Zhuo Y, Luo Q, Wu Z, Midya R, Wang Z, Song W, Wang R, Upadhyay N K, Fang Y, Kiani F, Rao M, Yang Y, Xia Q, Liu Q, Liu M, Yang J J 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 51
Google Scholar
[33] Chua L O 2011 Appl. Phys. A 102 765
Google Scholar
[34] Liang Y, Lu Z, Wang G, Dong Y, Yu D, Iu H H C 2020 IEEE Access 8 75571
Google Scholar
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 6401
- PDF下载量: 197
- 被引次数: 0
