-
基于D型光纤与回音壁模式的微管谐振腔耦合, 结合微流控技术, 本文提出一种折射率传感器, 其中耦合区采用全封装方式. 此传感器所需液体样本很少(约5 nL), 不易碎, 抗环境干扰能力、可移植性和重复性优于一般光纤与微腔耦合的传感器. 通过数值仿真, 研究了微流控微管谐振腔的谐振特性, 并分析了折射率传感的性能. 研究结果表明, 管壁厚度和液体折射率对传感性能影响比较大, 谐振波长漂移量与液体折射率有良好的线性关系, 折射率灵敏度高(510.5—852.7 nm/RIU), Q值可达5.53 × 104, 探测极限可达2.11 × 10–6.Based on the coupling between the D-shape fiber and the microtube resonator in the whispering gallery mode, combined with the microfluidics, a refractive index sensor is proposed in this paper, in which the coupling region is fully encapsulated. This sensor requires a very little liquid sample (about 5 nL), is not fragile, and has better resistance to environmental perturbation, portability and repeatability than the general fiber-microcavity-coupled sensor. By the numerical simulation, the resonance properties of the microfluidic microtube resonator are investigated, and the refractive index sensing performance is analyzed. The research results show that the thickness of the mircotube-wall and the liquid refractive index have a great influence on the sensor performance. The shift of the resonance wavelength has a good linear relationship with the liquid refractive index. Meanwhile, the refractive index sensitivity is high (510.5–852.7 nm/RIU), and the Q-factor reaches up to 5.53×104, the detection limit can arrive at 2.11 × 10–6.
-
Keywords:
- optofluidics /
- D-type fiber /
- microtube resonator /
- refractive index sensor
[1] Dehghannasiri R, Soltani M, Adibi A 2017 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 34 2259
Google Scholar
[2] Gardosi G, Mangan B J, Puc G S, Sumetsky M 2021 ACS Photonics 8 436
Google Scholar
[3] Vahala K J 2003 Nature 424 839
Google Scholar
[4] Ajad A K, Islam M J, Kaysir M R 2020 11th International Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering Dhaka, Bangladesh, December 17–19, 2020 p202
[5] Chang Y H, Dong B W, Ma Y M, Wei J X, Ren Z H, Lee C K 2020 Opt. Express 28 6251
Google Scholar
[6] Zhang M, Cheng W F, Zheng Z, Cheng J G, Liu J S 2019 Microfluid. Nanofluid. 23 1
Google Scholar
[7] Wang Z, Mallik A K, Wei F F, Wang Z C, Rout A, Wu Q, Semenova Y Y 2021 Opt. Express 29 23569
Google Scholar
[8] da Silva J, Salameh E, Ötügen M V, Fourguette D 2021 Appl. Opt. 60 1434
Google Scholar
[9] Zhang Y N, Zhou T M, Han B, Zhang A Z, Zhao Y 2018 Nanoscale 10 13832
Google Scholar
[10] Yan Y Z, Zou C L, Yan S B, et al. 2011 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 23 1736
Google Scholar
[11] Zhang Y N, Zhu N S, Zhou T M, Zheng Y, Shum P P 2019 IEEE Sens. J. 20 833
Google Scholar
[12] Monifi F, Ozdemir S K, Friedlein J, Yang L 2013 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 25 1458
Google Scholar
[13] Duduś A, Blue R, Uttamchandani D 2013 IEEE Sens. J. 13 1594
Google Scholar
[14] Wan H D, Chen J J, Wan C, Zhou Q, Wang J, Zhang Z X 2019 Biomed. Opt. Express 10 3929
Google Scholar
[15] Fan S, Healy N 2020 Opt. Lett. 45 4128
Google Scholar
[16] Jiang L, Zhao L, Wang S, et al. 2011 Opt. Express 19 17591
Google Scholar
[17] Zakaria R, Zainuddin N M, Fahri M A S A, et al. 2021 Opt. Fiber Technol. 61 102449
Google Scholar
[18] 张兴旺 2014 博士学位论文 (上海: 复旦大学)
Zhang X W 2014 Ph. D. Dissertation (Shanghai: Fudan University) (in Chinese)
[19] Zamora V, Díez A, Andrés M V, Gimeno B 2007 Opt. Express 15 12011
Google Scholar
[20] Foreman M R, Swaim J D, Vollmer F 2015 Adv. Opt. Photonics 7 168
Google Scholar
[21] Okamoto K 2021 Fundamentals of Optical Waveguides (Vol. 3) (Amsterdam: Elsevier) pp211–325
[22] Ling T, Guo L J 2007 Opt. Express 15 17424
Google Scholar
[23] Wang Y J, Zhang H, Duan S X, Lin W, Liu B, Wu J X 2020 IEEE Sens. J. 21 9148
Google Scholar
[24] Cao J W, Wang Q, Chai Z E, Zhu Y X, Liu H, Liu K, Ren X M 2018 Asia Communications and Photonics Conference Hangzhou, China, October 26–29, 2018 pSu2A.238
-
图 1 D型光纤与微管耦合的微流控折射率传感器 (a) 结构; (b) 微管内WGM谐振光谱
Fig. 1. Microfluidic refractive index sensor based on D-type fiber and microtube coupling: (a) Structure; (b) WGM resonance spectrum in the microtube.
图 2 管芯液体折射率n1为1.330时的传感特性 (a) 输出光谱, 其中右上角是谐振波长λres为1550.33 nm时对应的半高线宽(FWHM)和Q值; (b) 微管谐振腔中光场径向分布, 其中两条虚线所夹空间为微管壁; (c) 折射率灵敏度曲线
Fig. 2. Sensing characteristics under the liquid refractive index n1 of 1.330: (a) Output spectrum, where there is the FWHM and Q-factor of the resonant wavelength (λres) of 1550.33 nm at the top-right corner; (b) radial distribution of optical field in the microtube resonator, and the space between two dotted lines is the microtube wall; (c) curve of the refractive index sensitivity.
图 3 微管壁厚度不同时的输出光谱, 其中右上角是待测液体折射率n1为1.450—1.458时的灵敏度曲线, 图(a)—(c)对应的微管壁厚度分别为(a) 1.5 μm; (b) 1 μm; (c) 0.5 μm
Fig. 3. Output spectra corresponding to different microtube-wall thicknesses, where there is the sensitivity curve corresponding to the liquid refractive index n1 of 1.450–1.458 at the top-right corner, and the microtube-wall thickness is (a) 1.5 μm, (b) 1 μm, (c) 0.5 μm
图 4 微管谐振腔中光场分布图, 其中液体折射率n1是(a), (b) 1.450; (c), (d) 1.500; (e), (f) 1.700
Fig. 4. Distribution of optical field in the microtube resonantor, where the liquid refractive index n1 is: (a), (b) 1.450; (c), (d) 1.500; (e), (f) 1.700.
图 5 液体折射率不同时的输出光谱, 其中液体折射率n1是(a) 1.450, (b) 1.500, (c) 1.700
Fig. 5. Output spectra corresponding to different liquid refractive indices, where the liquid refractive index n1 is (a) 1.450, (b) 1.500, (c) 1.700.
图 6 折射率传感器的输出光谱(a), (c), (e)和灵敏度曲线(b) , (d) , (f)
Fig. 6. Output spectra (a), (c), (e) and sensitivity curves (b), (d), (f) of the refractive index sensor.
表 1 不同微管壁厚度的传感器性能
Table 1. Sensor properties of different microtube-wall thicknesses.
微管壁的
厚度/μm液体的折射率 1.450—1.458 1.500—1.504 Q 值 灵敏度/
(nm·RIU–1)Q 值 灵敏度/
( nm·RIU–1)1.5 2.42 × 103 238.3 1.10 × 104 709.7 1 2.77 × 103 510.7 1.15 × 104 815.6 0.5 3.86 × 103 805.2 5.00 × 104 914.4 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 传感器的输出特性
Table 2. Output characteristics of the sensor
液体折射率 谐振
模式谐振波
长/nm自由光谱
范围/nm半高线
宽/nmQ值 1.450 $ {\mathrm{T}\mathrm{E}}_{293}^{1} $ 1543.75 5.27
5.320.555 2.78 × 103 $ {\mathrm{T}\mathrm{E}}_{292}^{1} $ 1549.02 0.560 2.77 × 103 $ {\mathrm{T}\mathrm{E}}_{291}^{1} $ 1554.34 0.570 2.73 × 103 1.500 $ {\mathrm{T}\mathrm{E}}_{302}^{1} $ 1544.73 5.19
5.210.132 1.17 × 104 $ {\mathrm{T}\mathrm{E}}_{301}^{1} $ 1549.92 0.135 1.15 × 104 $ {\mathrm{T}\mathrm{E}}_{300}^{1} $ 1555.13 0.139 1.12 × 104 1.700 $ {\mathrm{T}\mathrm{E}}_{341}^{6} $ 1549.29 4.78
4.860.028 5.53 × 104 $ {\mathrm{T}\mathrm{E}}_{340}^{6} $ 1554.07 0.029 5.36 × 104 $ {\mathrm{T}\mathrm{E}}_{339}^{6} $ 1558.90 0.030 5.20 × 104
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 传感器性能
Table 3. Sensor performance.
液体折射率 Q值 灵敏度/(nm·RIU–1) 探测极限 1.450—1.458 (2.73—2.78) × 103 510.5—515.3 (6.52—6.63) × 10–5 1.500—1.504 (1.12—1.17) × 104 813.1—818.3 (0.97—1.02) × 10–5 1.696—1.700 (5.20—5.53) × 104 848.2—852.7 (1.98—2.11) × 10–6
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Dehghannasiri R, Soltani M, Adibi A 2017 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 34 2259
Google Scholar
[2] Gardosi G, Mangan B J, Puc G S, Sumetsky M 2021 ACS Photonics 8 436
Google Scholar
[3] Vahala K J 2003 Nature 424 839
Google Scholar
[4] Ajad A K, Islam M J, Kaysir M R 2020 11th International Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering Dhaka, Bangladesh, December 17–19, 2020 p202
[5] Chang Y H, Dong B W, Ma Y M, Wei J X, Ren Z H, Lee C K 2020 Opt. Express 28 6251
Google Scholar
[6] Zhang M, Cheng W F, Zheng Z, Cheng J G, Liu J S 2019 Microfluid. Nanofluid. 23 1
Google Scholar
[7] Wang Z, Mallik A K, Wei F F, Wang Z C, Rout A, Wu Q, Semenova Y Y 2021 Opt. Express 29 23569
Google Scholar
[8] da Silva J, Salameh E, Ötügen M V, Fourguette D 2021 Appl. Opt. 60 1434
Google Scholar
[9] Zhang Y N, Zhou T M, Han B, Zhang A Z, Zhao Y 2018 Nanoscale 10 13832
Google Scholar
[10] Yan Y Z, Zou C L, Yan S B, et al. 2011 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 23 1736
Google Scholar
[11] Zhang Y N, Zhu N S, Zhou T M, Zheng Y, Shum P P 2019 IEEE Sens. J. 20 833
Google Scholar
[12] Monifi F, Ozdemir S K, Friedlein J, Yang L 2013 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 25 1458
Google Scholar
[13] Duduś A, Blue R, Uttamchandani D 2013 IEEE Sens. J. 13 1594
Google Scholar
[14] Wan H D, Chen J J, Wan C, Zhou Q, Wang J, Zhang Z X 2019 Biomed. Opt. Express 10 3929
Google Scholar
[15] Fan S, Healy N 2020 Opt. Lett. 45 4128
Google Scholar
[16] Jiang L, Zhao L, Wang S, et al. 2011 Opt. Express 19 17591
Google Scholar
[17] Zakaria R, Zainuddin N M, Fahri M A S A, et al. 2021 Opt. Fiber Technol. 61 102449
Google Scholar
[18] 张兴旺 2014 博士学位论文 (上海: 复旦大学)
Zhang X W 2014 Ph. D. Dissertation (Shanghai: Fudan University) (in Chinese)
[19] Zamora V, Díez A, Andrés M V, Gimeno B 2007 Opt. Express 15 12011
Google Scholar
[20] Foreman M R, Swaim J D, Vollmer F 2015 Adv. Opt. Photonics 7 168
Google Scholar
[21] Okamoto K 2021 Fundamentals of Optical Waveguides (Vol. 3) (Amsterdam: Elsevier) pp211–325
[22] Ling T, Guo L J 2007 Opt. Express 15 17424
Google Scholar
[23] Wang Y J, Zhang H, Duan S X, Lin W, Liu B, Wu J X 2020 IEEE Sens. J. 21 9148
Google Scholar
[24] Cao J W, Wang Q, Chai Z E, Zhu Y X, Liu H, Liu K, Ren X M 2018 Asia Communications and Photonics Conference Hangzhou, China, October 26–29, 2018 pSu2A.238
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 3573
- PDF下载量: 76
- 被引次数: 0
