搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

J-TEXT托卡马克锯齿振荡期间湍流传播和对称性破缺对边缘剪切流的影响

丁肖冠 赵开君 谢耀禹 陈志鹏 陈忠勇 杨州军 高丽 丁永华 温思宇 胡莹欣

引用本文:
Citation:

J-TEXT托卡马克锯齿振荡期间湍流传播和对称性破缺对边缘剪切流的影响

丁肖冠, 赵开君, 谢耀禹, 陈志鹏, 陈忠勇, 杨州军, 高丽, 丁永华, 温思宇, 胡莹欣

Effects of turbulence spreading and symmetry breaking on edge shear flow during sawtooth cycles in J-TEXT tokamak

Ding Xiao-Guan, Zhao Kai-Jun, Xie Yao-Yu, Chen Zhi-Peng, Chen Zhong-Yong, Yang Zhou-Jun, Gao Li, Ding Yong-Hua, Wen Si-Yu, Hu Ying-Xin
PDF
导出引用
  • 锯齿振荡引起热脉冲和湍流脉冲可以传播到边缘等离子体中增强边缘剪切流并诱发低约束模到高约束模的转换。在J-TEXT托卡马克上首次观测了锯齿振荡期间湍流传播和对称性破缺对边缘剪切流的影响。采用快速往复静电探针阵列测量了边缘等离子体湍流和剪切流等。观测到锯齿崩塌后,芯部的热脉冲和湍流传播至边缘等离子体,且湍流脉冲快于热脉冲。发现了锯齿崩塌后在边缘等离子体中引起湍流对称性破缺。湍流传播和对称性破缺可以增强湍流雷诺协强,从而驱动剪切流。这些结果阐明了锯齿崩塌对边缘湍流和剪切流的增强作用过程。
    The effect of sawteeth on plasma performance and transport in the plasmas of tokamak is an important issue in the fusion field. Sawtooth oscillations can trigger heat and turbulence pulses that propagate into the edge plasmas, and thus enhance the edge shear flow and induce a transition from low confinement mode to high confinement mode. The influences of turbulence spreading and symmetry breaking on edge shear flow with sawtooth crashes are observed in the J-TEXT tokamak. The edge plasma turbulence and shear flow were measured using a fast reciprocating electrostatic probe array. The experimental data were analyzed using methods such as conditional average and probability distribution function. After sawtooth crashes, the heat and turbulence pulses in the core propagate to the edge, with the turbulence pulse being faster than the heat pulse. Figures 1 (a)-(e) show the core electron temperature, and the edge electron temperature, turbulence intensity, turbulence drive and spreading rates, Reynolds stress and its gradient, and shearing rates, respectively. Following sawtooth crashes, the edge electron temperature increases and the edge turbulence is enhanced, with turbulence preceding temperature. The enhanced edge turbulence is mainly composed of two parts: turbulence driven by local gradient and turbulence spreading from core to edge. The development of the estimated turbulence spreading rates is prior to that of the turbulence driving rates. The increase in the turbulence intensity can cause the enhancements of the turbulent Reynold stresses and its gradient, thereby enhancing shear flows and radial electric fields. Turbulence spreading leads to the development of edge Reynolds stresses and shear flow faster than edge electron temperature. The Reynolds stress arises from the symmetry breaking of the turbulence wave number spectrum. After sawtooth collapse, the joint probability density function of radial and poloidal wave numbers of turbulence intensity became highly skewed and anisotropic, exhibiting strong asymmetry, as seen in the figures 1 (f) and (g). The development of turbulence spreading flux at the edge is also prior to the particle flux driven by turbulence, indicating that turbulent energy transport is not simply accompanied by turbulent particle transport. These results show that turbulence spreading and symmetry breaking can enhance turbulent Reynolds stress, thereby driving shear flows, after sawtooth crashes.
  • [1]

    Hastie R J 1997 Astrophys. Space Sci. 256 177

    [2]

    Von Goeler S, Stodiek W, Sauthoff N 1974 Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 1201

    [3]

    Wanger F, Fussmann G, Grave T, Keilhacker M, Kornherr M, Lackner K, McCormick K, Müller E R, Stäbler A, Becker G, Bernhardi K, Ditte U, Eberhagen A, Gehre O, Gernhardt J, Gierke G V, Glock E, Gruber O, Haas G, Hesse M, Janeschitz G, Karger F, Kissel S, Klüber O, Lisitano G, Mayer H M, Meisel D, Mertens V, Murmann H, Poschenrieder W, Rapp H, Röhr H, Ryter F, Schneider F, Siller G, Smeulders P, Söldner F, Speth E, Steuer K -H, Szymanski Z, Vollmer O 1984 Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 1453

    [4]

    Ido T, Kamiya K, Miura Y, Hamada Y, Nishizawa A, Kawasumi Y 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 055006

    [5]

    Martin Y R, Team T 2004 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 46 A77

    [6]

    Moyer R A, Burrell K H, Carlstrom T N, Coda S, Conn R W, Doyle E J, Gohil P, Groebner R J, Kim J, Lehmer R, Peebles W A, Porkolab M, Rettig C L, Rhodes T L, Seraydarian R P, Stockdale R, Thomas D M, Tynan G R, Watkins J G 1995 Phys. Plasmas 2 2397

    [7]

    Burrell K H 1997 Phys. Plasmas 4 1499

    [8]

    Manz P, Xu M, Thakur S C, Tynan G R 2011 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 53 095001

    [9]

    Zhao K J, Cheng J, Diamond P H, Dong J Q, Yan L W, Hong W Y, Xu M, Tynan G, Miki K, Huang Z H, Itoh K, Itoh S -I, Fujisawa A, Nagashima Y, Inagaki S, Wang Z X, Wei L, Song X M, Lei G J, Li Q, Ji X Q, Liu Y, Yang Q W, Ding X T, Duan X R, HL-2A Team 2013 Nucl. Fusion 53 123015

    [10]

    Zhao K J, Nagashima Y, Guo Z B, Dong J Q, Yan L W, Itoh K, Itoh S -I, Li X B, Li J Q, Fujisawa A, Inagaki S, Cheng J, Xu J Q, Kosuga Y, Sasaki M, Wang Z X, Zhang H Q, Chen Y Q, Cao X G, Yu D L, Liu Y, Song X M, Xia F, Wang S 2022 Plasma Sci. Technol. 25 015101

    [11]

    Zhang J Y, Zhao K J, Yang Z J, Chen Z P, Guo Z B, Dong J Q, Itoh K, Chen Z Y, Shi Y J, Ding Y H, Li J Q, Xie Y Y, Zhang H Q, Chen Y Q, Li R, Cao X G, Du J J, Jiang J M, Zhang G S, Cheng J, Xu J Q, Xiang L, Wang N C, Wang L, Liang Y F, J-TEXT team 2023 Phys. Plasmas 30 082305

    [12]

    Grenfell G, Van Milligen B PH, Losada U, Ting W, Liu B, Silva C, Spolaore M, Hidalgo C, TJ-II Team 2019 Nucl. Fusion 59 016018

    [13]

    Long T, Diamond P H, Ke R, Chen Z P, Xu X, Tian W J, Hong R J, Cao M Y, Liu Y M, Xu M, Wang L, Yang Z J, Yuan J B, Zhou Y K, Yan Q H, Yang Q H, Shen C S, Nie L, Wang Z H, Hao G Z, Wang N C, Chen Z Y, Li J Q, Chen Wei, Zhong W L 2024 Nucl. Fusion 64 066011

    [14]

    Long T, Diamond P H, Ke R, Chen Z P, Cao M Y, Xu X, Xu M, Hong R J, Tian W J, Yuan J B, Liu Y M, Yan Q H, Yang Q H, Shen C S, Guo W X, Wang L, Nie L, Wang Z H, Hao G Z, Wang N C, Chen Z Y, Pan Y, Li J Q, Chen W, Zhong W L 2024 Nucl. Fusion 64 064002

    [15]

    Ding Y H, Wang N C, Chen Z Y, Xia D H, Yang Z J, Chen Z P, Zheng W, Yan W, Li D, Zhou S, Xu X, Zhang X Y, Mao F Y, Fang J G, Ren Z K, Chen X X, Zhang J L, Zhang X B, He Y, Zhang Q, Li Y, Bai W, Mou L K, Li F, Long T, Ke R, Gao L, Shi P, Shen C S, Liu J X, Guo W X, Wang L, Li H H, Jiang Z H, Zhang X Q, Li J C, Rao B, Cheng Z F, Zhu P, Liu M H, Xu T, Ma S X, Yang Y, Li C, Wang Z J, Zhang M, Yu K X, Hu X W, Liang Y, Yu Q, Gentle K W, Pan Y, the J-TEXT Team 2024 Nucl. Fusion 64 112005

    [16]

    Liang Y F, Wang N C, Ding Y H, Chen Z Y, Chen Z P, Yang Z J, Hu Q M, Cheng Z F, Wang L, Jiang Z H, Rao B, Huang Z, Li Y, Yan W, Li D, Liu H, Zeng L, Huang Y, Huang D W, Lin Z F, Zheng W, Hu F R, Zhao K J, Jiang M, Shi Y J, Zhou H, Peng S T, Guo W X, Gao L, Wang Z J, Zhang M, Yu K X, Hu X W, Yu Q, Zhuang G, Gentle K W, Pan Y, the J-TEXT Team 2019 Nucl. Fusion 59 112016

    [17]

    Zhao K J, Lan T, Dong J Q, Yan L W, Hong W Y, Yu C X, Liu A D, Qian J, Cheng J, Yu D L, Yang Q W, Ding X T, Liu Y, Pan C H 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 255004

    [18]

    Xie Y Y, Zhao K J, Yang Z J, Chen Z P, Dong J Q, Chen Z Y, Shi Y J, Tan M Z, Gao L, Ding Y H, Chen Y Q, Zhang H Q, Li R, Cao X G, Du J J, Jiang J M, Zhang G S, Cheng J, Xu J Q, Zhang J Y, Xiang L, Wang N C, Wang L, Liang Y F 2025 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 67 015008

    [19]

    Manz P, Ribeiro T T, Scott B D, Birkenmeier G, Carralero D, Fuchert G, Müller S H, Müller H W, Stroth U, Wolfrum E 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 022308

    [20]

    Wu T, Diamond P H, Nie L, Xu M, Yu Y, Hong R J, Chen Y H, Xu J Q, Long T, Zhang Y, Yan Q H, Ke R, Cheng J, Li W, Huang Z H, Yan L W, Chu X, Wang Z H, Hidalgo C 2023 Nucl. Fusion 63 126001

    [21]

    Long T, Diamond P H, Ke R, Nie L, Xu M, Zhang X Y, Li B L, Chen Z P, Xu X, Wang Z H, Wu T, Tian W J, Yuan J B, Yuan B D, Gong S B, Xiao C Y, Gao J M, Hao Z G, Wang N C, Chen Z Y, Yang Z J, Gao L, Ding Y H, Pan Y, Chen W, Hao G Z, Li J Q, Zhong W L, Duan X R 2021 Nucl. Fusion 61 126066

    [22]

    Gürcan Ö D, Diamond P H, Hahm T S 2006 Phys. Plasmas 13 052306

    [23]

    Hahm T S, Diamond P H 2018 J. Korean Phys. Soc. 73 747

    [24]

    Wolf R C 2003 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 45 R1

    [25]

    Zhao K J, Chen Z P, Shi Y J, Diamond P H, Dong J Q, Chen Z Y, Ding Y H, Zhuang G, Liu Y B, Zhang H Q, Chen Y Q, Liu H, Cheng J, Nie L, Rao B, Cheng Z F, Gao L, Zhang X Q, Yang Z J, Wang N C, Wang L, Li J Q, Jin W, Xu J Q, Yan L W, Liang Y F, Xie Y Y, Liu B 2020 Nucl. Fusion 60 106030

    [26]

    Diamond P H, Kim B 1991 Phys. Fluids B 3 1621

    [27]

    Xu Y H, Yu C X, Luo J R, Mao J S, Liu B H, Li J G, Wan B N, Wan Y X 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 3867

    [28]

    Diamond P H, Kosuga Y, Gürcan Ö D, McDevitt C J, Hahm T S, Fedorczak N, Rice J E, Wang W X, Ku S, Kwon J M, Dif-Pradalier G, Abiteboul J, Wang L, Ko W H, Shi Y J, Ida K, Solomon W, Jhang H, Kim S S, Yi S, Ko S H, Sarazin Y, Singh R, Chang C S 2013 Nucl. Fusion 53 104019

  • [1] 胡莹欣, 赵开君, 李继全, 严龙文, 许健强, 黄治辉, 余德良, 谢耀禹, 丁肖冠, 温思宇. HL-2A托卡马克电子回旋共振加热调制对湍流驱动和传播的影响. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.74.20241263
    [2] 张启凡, 乐文成, 张羽昊, 葛忠昕, 邝志强, 萧声扬, 王璐. 钨杂质辐射对托卡马克等离子体大破裂快速热猝灭阶段热能损失过程的影响. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240730
    [3] 朱霄龙, 陈伟, 王丰, 王正汹. 托卡马克中低频磁流体不稳定性协同作用引起快粒子输运的混合模拟研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230620
    [4] 王福琼, 徐颖峰, 查学军, 钟方川. 托卡马克边界等离子体中钨杂质输运的多流体及动力学模拟. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230991
    [5] 刘冠男, 李新霞, 刘洪波, 孙爱萍. HL-2M托卡马克装置中螺旋波与低杂波的协同电流驱动. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231077
    [6] 沈勇, 董家齐, 何宏达, 潘卫, 郝广周. 托卡马克理想导体壁与磁流体不稳定性. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222043
    [7] 刘朝阳, 章扬忠, 谢涛, 刘阿娣, 周楚. 托卡马克无碰撞捕获电子模在时空表象中的群速度. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20202003
    [8] 吴雪科, 孙小琴, 刘殷学, 李会东, 周雨林, 王占辉, 冯灏. 超声分子束注入密度和宽度对托克马克装置加料深度的影响. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.66.195201
    [9] 张重阳, 刘阿娣, 李弘, 陈志鹏, 李斌, 杨州军, 周楚, 谢锦林, 兰涛, 刘万东, 庄革, 俞昌旋. 双极化频率调制微波反射计在J-TEXT托卡马克上的应用. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.63.125204
    [10] 杜海龙, 桑超峰, 王亮, 孙继忠, 刘少承, 汪惠乾, 张凌, 郭后扬, 王德真. 东方超环托卡马克高约束模式边界等离子体输运数值模拟研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.62.245206
    [11] 卢洪伟, 查学军, 胡立群, 林士耀, 周瑞杰, 罗家融, 钟方川. HT-7托卡马克slide-away放电充气对等离子体行为的影响. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.61.075202
    [12] 洪斌斌, 陈少永, 唐昌建, 张新军, 胡有俊. 托卡马克中电子回旋波与低杂波协同驱动的物理研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.61.115207
    [13] 卢洪伟, 胡立群, 林士耀, 钟国强, 周瑞杰, 张继宗. HT-7托卡马克等离子体slide-away放电研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.59.5596
    [14] 徐强, 高翔, 单家方, 胡立群, 赵君煜. HT-7托卡马克大功率低混杂波电流驱动的实验研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.58.8448
    [15] 龚学余, 彭晓炜, 谢安平, 刘文艳. 托卡马克等离子体不同运行模式下的电子回旋波电流驱动. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.55.1307
    [16] 徐 伟, 万宝年, 谢纪康. HT-6M托卡马克装置杂质输运. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.52.1970
    [17] 王文浩, 俞昌旋, 许宇鸿, 闻一之, 凌必利, 宋梅, 万宝年. HT-7超导托卡马克边界等离子体参量及其涨落的实验研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.50.1521
    [18] 张先梅, 万宝年, 阮怀林, 吴振伟. HT-7托卡马克等离子体欧姆放电时电子热扩散系数的研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.50.715
    [19] 王文浩, 许宇鸿, 俞昌旋, 闻一之, 凌必利, 宋梅, 万宝年. HT-7超导托卡马克边缘涨落谱特征及湍流输运研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.50.1956
    [20] 石秉仁. 托卡马克低混杂波电流驱动实验中低混杂波传播的解析分析. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.49.2394
计量
  • 文章访问数:  118
  • PDF下载量:  6
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 上网日期:  2024-12-25

/

返回文章
返回