利用有机磁效应研究电荷平衡影响激基复合物器件发光效率的物理机制

赵茜; 郑冬; 王晶晶; 陈敬; 杨俊; 周银琼; 张可怡; 熊祖洪

doi:10.7498/aps.74.20241601

摘要

电荷平衡会影响激基复合物有机发光二极管的发光效率, 然而对其背后的物理机制却缺乏充分的理解. 本文利用有机磁效应包括磁电导(magneto-conductance, MC)、磁电致发光(magneto-electroluminescence, MEL)和磁效率(magneto-efficiency, Mη)作为指纹式探测工具来研究电荷平衡影响激基复合物器件发光效率的物理机制. 实验发现, 非平衡器件的MC曲线中快速上升的低场效应(low-field effects, MC_L, |B| ≤ 10 mT)和缓慢下降的高场效应(high-field effects, MC_H, 10 < |B| ≤ 300 mT)分别归因于被磁场调控的系间窜越(intersystem crossing, ISC)过程和三重态激基复合物与多余电荷之间的三重态-电荷湮灭(triplet-charge annihilation, TCA)过程. 与非平衡器件不同, 平衡器件中快速下降的MC_L和快速饱和的MC_H分别归因于被磁场调控的反向系间窜越(reverse intersystem crossing, RISC)过程和平衡的载流子注入. 随着注入电流从200 μA减小到25 μA, 非平衡器件中MEL曲线的低场效应(MEL_L)始终反映被磁场调控的ISC过程, 然而平衡器件的MEL_L呈现从ISC向RISC过程的转换(ISC → RISC). 另外, 虽然非平衡和平衡器件中Mη曲线的低场效应(Mη_L)都归因于被磁场调控的ISC过程, 但是平衡器件中Mη_L的幅值为非平衡器件的~1/4. 这两种器件中不同的MC, MEL和Mη曲线揭示平衡的载流子注入会通过减弱TCA过程来增加三重态激基复合物的数量, 从而增强RISC过程. 因为RISC可以将不能退激辐射的三重态激基复合物转换为能退激辐射的单重态激基复合物, 所以平衡器件的发光效率比非平衡器件的更高. 显然, 本文利用有机磁效应对电荷平衡影响激基复合物器件发光效率这个现象提出了一种新的物理机制.

关键词:

Abstract

Charge balances can influence the emission efficiency of exciplex-based organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), but so far, the physical mechanism behind this phenomenon is not fully understood. Here, organic magnetic field effects (OMFEs) including magneto-conductance (MC), magneto-electroluminescence (MEL), and magneto-efficiency (Mη) are used as fingerprint probing tools to study physical mechanism of influence of charge balance on the emission efficiency of exciplex-based OLEDs. Specifically, low- and high-field effects of MC traces [MC_L (|B| ≤ 10 mT) and MC_H (10 < |B| ≤ 300 mT)] from the unbalanced device are separately attributed to the magnetic field (B)-mediated intersystem crossing (ISC) process and the B-mediated triplet-charge annihilation (TCA) process between triplet exciplex states and excessive charge carriers, whereas those from the balanced device are respectively attributed to the B-mediated reverse intersystem crossing (RISC) process and the balanced carrier injection. As the injection current decreases from 200 to 25 μA, low-field effects of MEL traces (MEL_L) form the unbalanced device always reflect the B-mediated ISC process, but those from the balanced device exhibit a conversion from ISC process to RISC process. Furthermore, although low-field effects of Mη traces (Mη_L) from unbalanced device and balanced device are attributed to the B-mediated ISC process, Mη_L value in the balanced device is approximately one-fourth of that in the unbalanced device. These different MC, MEL, and Mη traces reveal that the balanced carrier injection can increase the number of triplet exciplex states via weakening the TCA process, which leads to the enhanced RISC process. Because RISC can convert dark triplet exciplex states into bright singlet exciplex states, the emission efficiency of the balanced device is higher than that of the unbalanced one. Obviously, in this work OMFEs are used to provide a new physical mechanism for charge balance that influences the emission efficiency of exciplex-based OLEDs.

Keywords:

作者及机构信息

1.
重庆电力高等专科学校信息工程学院, 重庆　400053

2.
西南大学物理科学与技术学院, 微纳结构光电子学重庆市重点实验室, 重庆　400715

通信作者: 熊祖洪, zhxiong@swu.edu.cn

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 12474074)和重庆市教育委员会科学技术研究项目(批准号: KJQN202402606)资助的课题.

Authors and contacts

1.
School of Information Engineering, Chongqing Electric Power College, Chongqing 400053, China

2.
Chongqing Key Laboratory of Micro & Nano Structure Optoelectronics, School of Physical Science and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

Corresponding author: XIONG Zuhong, zhxiong@swu.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12474074) and the Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Education Commission of China (Grant No. KJQN202402606).

文章全文

参考文献

[1]	Gu J N, Tang Z Y, Guo H Q, Chen Y, Xiao J, Chen Z J, Xiao L X 2022 J. Mater. Chem. C 10 4521 Google Scholar
[2]	Amin N R A, Kesavan K K, Biring S, Lee C C, Yeh T H, Ko T Y, Liu S W, Wong K T, 2020 ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2 1011 Google Scholar
[3]	Li W S, Zhang X W, Zhang Y, Xu K, Xu J W, Wang H, Li H O, Guo J, Mo J H, Yang P Z 2018 Synth. Met. 245 111 Google Scholar
[4]	Ying S A, Yuan J K, Zhang S, Sun Q, Dai Y F, Qiao X F, Yang D Z, Chen J S, Ma D G 2019 J. Mater. Chem. C 7 7114 Google Scholar
[5]	Hung W Y, Chiang P Y, Lin S W, Tang W C, Chen Y T, Liu S H, Chou P T, Hung Y T, Wong K T 2016 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 4811 Google Scholar
[6]	Sheng R, Li A S, Zhang F J, Song J, Duan Y, Chen P 2020 Adv. Optical Mater. 8 1901247 Google Scholar
[7]	宁亚茹, 赵茜, 汤仙童, 陈敬, 吴凤娇, 贾伟尧, 陈晓莉, 熊祖洪 2022 物理学报 71 087201 Google Scholar Ning Y R, Zhao X, Tang X T, Chen J, Wu F J, Jia W Y, Chen X L, Xiong Z H 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 087201 Google Scholar
[8]	Liu C H, Du H T, Yu Y, Chen Z, Ren J F, Fan J H, Liu Q, Han S H, Pang Z Y 2024 Org. Electron. 128 107025 Google Scholar
[9]	Jin P F, Zhou Z Y, Wang H, Hao J J, Chen R, Wang J Y, Zhang C 2022 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13 2516 Google Scholar
[10]	Wei F X, Chen J, Zhao X, Wu Y T, Wang H Y, Chen X L, Xiong Z H 2023 Adv. Sci. 10 2303192 Google Scholar
[11]	Niu L B, Zhang Y, Chen L J, Zhang Q M, Guan Y X 2020 Org. Electron. 87 105971 Google Scholar
[12]	赵茜, 陈敬, 彭腾, 刘俊宏, 汪波, 陈晓莉, 熊祖洪 2023 物理学报 72 167201 Google Scholar Zhao X, Chen J, Peng T, Liu J H, Wang B, Chen X L, Xiong Z H 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 167201 Google Scholar
[13]	Wu F J, Zhao X, Zhu H Q, Tang X T, Ning Y R, Chen J, Chen X L, Xiong Z H 2022 ACS Photonics 9 2713 Google Scholar
[14]	Shao M, Yan L, Li M X, Ilia I, Hu B 2013 J. Mater. Chem. C 1 1330 Google Scholar
[15]	Zhao X, Tang X T, Zhu H Q, Ma C H, Wang Y, Ye S N, Tu L Y, Xiong Z H 2021 ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 3 3034 Google Scholar
[16]	Hsiao C H, Liu S W, Chen C T, Lee J H 2010 Org. Electron. 11 1500 Google Scholar
[17]	Hung W Y, Fang G C, Lin S W, Cheng S H, Wong K T, Kuo T Y, Chou P T 2014 Sci. Rep. 4 5161 Google Scholar
[18]	Shen D, Chen W C, Lo M F, Lee C S 2021 Mater. Today Energy 20 100644 Google Scholar
[19]	Zhang Q, Liu X J, Jiao F, Braun S, Jafari M J, Crispin X, Ederth T, Fahlman M 2017 J. Mater. Chem. C 5 275 Google Scholar
[20]	Hua J, Li J X, Zhan Z L, Chai Y, Cheng Z Y, Li P D, Dong H, Wang J 2022 RSC Adv. 12 21932 Google Scholar
[21]	Miao Y Q, Wang G L, Yin M N, Guo Y Y, Zhao B, Wang H 2023 Chem. Eng. J. 461 141921 Google Scholar
[22]	Sheng Y, Nguyen T D, Veeraraghavan G, Mermer Ö, Wohlgenannt M, Qiu S, Scherf U 2006 Phys. Rev. B 74 045213 Google Scholar
[23]	Wang Y F, Tiras K S, Harmon N J, Wohlgenannt M, Flatté M E 2016 Phys. Rev. X 6 011011 Google Scholar
[24]	Zhang T T, Holford D F, Gu H, Kreouzis T, Zhang S J, Gillin W P 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 023303 Google Scholar
[25]	Hu Y Q, Tang X T, Pan R H, Deng J Q, Zhu H Q, Xiong Z H 2019 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21 17673 Google Scholar
[26]	汤仙童, 潘睿亨, 熊祖洪 2023 科学通报 68 2401 Google Scholar Tang X T, Pan R H, Xiong Z H 2023 Chin. Sci. Bull. 68 2401 Google Scholar
[27]	Crooker S A, Liu F L, Kelley M R, Martinez N J D, Nie W Y, Mohite A D, Nayyar I H, Tretiak S, Smith D L, Ruden P P 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 153304 Google Scholar
[28]	Liu F L, Kelley M R, Crooker S A, Nie W Y, Mohite A D, Ruden P P, Smith D L 2014 Phys. Rev. B 90 235314 Google Scholar
[29]	Chen P, Peng Q M, Yao L, Gao N, Li F 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 063301 Google Scholar
[30]	Peng Q M, Li A W, Fan Y X, Chen P, Li F 2014 J. Mater. Chem. C 2 6264 Google Scholar
[31]	Janssen P, Cox M, Wouters S H W, Kemerink M, Wienk M M, Koopmans B 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 2286 Google Scholar
[32]	Yuan P S, Qiao X F, Yan D H, Ma D G 2018 J. Mater. Chem. C 6 5721 Google Scholar
[33]	Zhang T Y, Chu B, Li W L, Su Z S, Peng Q M, Zhao B, Luo Y S, Jin F M, Yan X W, Gao Y, Wu H R, Zhang F, Fan D, Wang J B 2014 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6 11907 Google Scholar
[34]	吴雨廷, 朱洪强, 魏福贤, 王辉耀, 陈敬, 宁亚茹, 吴凤娇, 陈晓莉, 熊祖洪 2022 物理学报 71 227201 Google Scholar Wu Y T, Zhu H Q, Wei F X, Wang H Y, Chen J, Ning Y R, Wu F J, Chen X L, Xiong Z H 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 227201 Google Scholar
[35]	Kim K H, Yoo S J, Kim J J 2016 Chem. Mater. 28 1936 Google Scholar
[36]	Zhu H Q, Jia W Y, Chen L X, Tang X T, Hu Y Q, Pan R H, Deng J Q, Xiong Z H 2019 J. Mater. Chem. C 7 553 Google Scholar

施引文献

图 1 (a), (b)能级排布图; (c)有机材料的分子结构图; (d)有机半导体薄膜的PL谱和器件的EL谱; (e), (f)电流随电压的变化关系和EL强度随电流的变化关系

Fig. 1. (a), (b) Energy-level diagrams; (c) molecular structures of organic materials; (d) PL spectra of organic semiconductor films and EL spectra of devices; (e), (f) current as a function of voltage and EL intensity as a function of current.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 器件1、器件2和器件3的电流效率-电压特性曲线

Fig. 2. Current efficiency-voltage characteristics of devices 1, 2, and 3.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 (a), (b)器件1和器件2中MC曲线的电流依赖关系

Fig. 3. (a), (b) Current-dependent MC traces of devices 1 and 2.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 (a), (b)器件1和器件2中PP态和EX态的形成和演变通道

Fig. 4. (a), (b) Formation and evolution channels of PP and EX states in devices 1 and 2.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 (a), (b) 器件1和器件2中MEL曲线的电流依赖关系

Fig. 5. (a), (b) Current-dependent MEL traces of devices 1 and 2.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 (a), (b)器件1和器件2中Mη曲线的电流依赖关系

Fig. 6. (a), (b) Current-dependent Mη traces of devices 1 and 2.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 器件3的能级结构、光电特性和有机磁效应　(a)能级结构; (b) EL谱; (c)亮度-电流特性; (d)—(f) MC, MEL和Mη曲线的电流依赖关系

Fig. 7. Energy-level structure, photoelectric properties, and OMFEs of device 3: (a) Energy-level structure; (b) EL spectrum; (c) brightness-current characteristic; (d)–(f) current-dependent MC, MEL, and Mη traces.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

[1]	Gu J N, Tang Z Y, Guo H Q, Chen Y, Xiao J, Chen Z J, Xiao L X 2022 J. Mater. Chem. C 10 4521 Google Scholar
[2]	Amin N R A, Kesavan K K, Biring S, Lee C C, Yeh T H, Ko T Y, Liu S W, Wong K T, 2020 ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2 1011 Google Scholar
[3]	Li W S, Zhang X W, Zhang Y, Xu K, Xu J W, Wang H, Li H O, Guo J, Mo J H, Yang P Z 2018 Synth. Met. 245 111 Google Scholar
[4]	Ying S A, Yuan J K, Zhang S, Sun Q, Dai Y F, Qiao X F, Yang D Z, Chen J S, Ma D G 2019 J. Mater. Chem. C 7 7114 Google Scholar
[5]	Hung W Y, Chiang P Y, Lin S W, Tang W C, Chen Y T, Liu S H, Chou P T, Hung Y T, Wong K T 2016 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 4811 Google Scholar
[6]	Sheng R, Li A S, Zhang F J, Song J, Duan Y, Chen P 2020 Adv. Optical Mater. 8 1901247 Google Scholar
[7]	宁亚茹, 赵茜, 汤仙童, 陈敬, 吴凤娇, 贾伟尧, 陈晓莉, 熊祖洪 2022 物理学报 71 087201 Google Scholar Ning Y R, Zhao X, Tang X T, Chen J, Wu F J, Jia W Y, Chen X L, Xiong Z H 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 087201 Google Scholar
[8]	Liu C H, Du H T, Yu Y, Chen Z, Ren J F, Fan J H, Liu Q, Han S H, Pang Z Y 2024 Org. Electron. 128 107025 Google Scholar
[9]	Jin P F, Zhou Z Y, Wang H, Hao J J, Chen R, Wang J Y, Zhang C 2022 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13 2516 Google Scholar
[10]	Wei F X, Chen J, Zhao X, Wu Y T, Wang H Y, Chen X L, Xiong Z H 2023 Adv. Sci. 10 2303192 Google Scholar
[11]	Niu L B, Zhang Y, Chen L J, Zhang Q M, Guan Y X 2020 Org. Electron. 87 105971 Google Scholar
[12]	赵茜, 陈敬, 彭腾, 刘俊宏, 汪波, 陈晓莉, 熊祖洪 2023 物理学报 72 167201 Google Scholar Zhao X, Chen J, Peng T, Liu J H, Wang B, Chen X L, Xiong Z H 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 167201 Google Scholar
[13]	Wu F J, Zhao X, Zhu H Q, Tang X T, Ning Y R, Chen J, Chen X L, Xiong Z H 2022 ACS Photonics 9 2713 Google Scholar
[14]	Shao M, Yan L, Li M X, Ilia I, Hu B 2013 J. Mater. Chem. C 1 1330 Google Scholar
[15]	Zhao X, Tang X T, Zhu H Q, Ma C H, Wang Y, Ye S N, Tu L Y, Xiong Z H 2021 ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 3 3034 Google Scholar
[16]	Hsiao C H, Liu S W, Chen C T, Lee J H 2010 Org. Electron. 11 1500 Google Scholar
[17]	Hung W Y, Fang G C, Lin S W, Cheng S H, Wong K T, Kuo T Y, Chou P T 2014 Sci. Rep. 4 5161 Google Scholar
[18]	Shen D, Chen W C, Lo M F, Lee C S 2021 Mater. Today Energy 20 100644 Google Scholar
[19]	Zhang Q, Liu X J, Jiao F, Braun S, Jafari M J, Crispin X, Ederth T, Fahlman M 2017 J. Mater. Chem. C 5 275 Google Scholar
[20]	Hua J, Li J X, Zhan Z L, Chai Y, Cheng Z Y, Li P D, Dong H, Wang J 2022 RSC Adv. 12 21932 Google Scholar
[21]	Miao Y Q, Wang G L, Yin M N, Guo Y Y, Zhao B, Wang H 2023 Chem. Eng. J. 461 141921 Google Scholar
[22]	Sheng Y, Nguyen T D, Veeraraghavan G, Mermer Ö, Wohlgenannt M, Qiu S, Scherf U 2006 Phys. Rev. B 74 045213 Google Scholar
[23]	Wang Y F, Tiras K S, Harmon N J, Wohlgenannt M, Flatté M E 2016 Phys. Rev. X 6 011011 Google Scholar
[24]	Zhang T T, Holford D F, Gu H, Kreouzis T, Zhang S J, Gillin W P 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 023303 Google Scholar
[25]	Hu Y Q, Tang X T, Pan R H, Deng J Q, Zhu H Q, Xiong Z H 2019 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21 17673 Google Scholar
[26]	汤仙童, 潘睿亨, 熊祖洪 2023 科学通报 68 2401 Google Scholar Tang X T, Pan R H, Xiong Z H 2023 Chin. Sci. Bull. 68 2401 Google Scholar
[27]	Crooker S A, Liu F L, Kelley M R, Martinez N J D, Nie W Y, Mohite A D, Nayyar I H, Tretiak S, Smith D L, Ruden P P 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 153304 Google Scholar
[28]	Liu F L, Kelley M R, Crooker S A, Nie W Y, Mohite A D, Ruden P P, Smith D L 2014 Phys. Rev. B 90 235314 Google Scholar
[29]	Chen P, Peng Q M, Yao L, Gao N, Li F 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 063301 Google Scholar
[30]	Peng Q M, Li A W, Fan Y X, Chen P, Li F 2014 J. Mater. Chem. C 2 6264 Google Scholar
[31]	Janssen P, Cox M, Wouters S H W, Kemerink M, Wienk M M, Koopmans B 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 2286 Google Scholar
[32]	Yuan P S, Qiao X F, Yan D H, Ma D G 2018 J. Mater. Chem. C 6 5721 Google Scholar
[33]	Zhang T Y, Chu B, Li W L, Su Z S, Peng Q M, Zhao B, Luo Y S, Jin F M, Yan X W, Gao Y, Wu H R, Zhang F, Fan D, Wang J B 2014 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6 11907 Google Scholar
[34]	吴雨廷, 朱洪强, 魏福贤, 王辉耀, 陈敬, 宁亚茹, 吴凤娇, 陈晓莉, 熊祖洪 2022 物理学报 71 227201 Google Scholar Wu Y T, Zhu H Q, Wei F X, Wang H Y, Chen J, Ning Y R, Wu F J, Chen X L, Xiong Z H 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 227201 Google Scholar
[35]	Kim K H, Yoo S J, Kim J J 2016 Chem. Mater. 28 1936 Google Scholar
[36]	Zhu H Q, Jia W Y, Chen L X, Tang X T, Hu Y Q, Pan R H, Deng J Q, Xiong Z H 2019 J. Mater. Chem. C 7 553 Google Scholar

[1]	彭腾, 王辉耀, 赵茜, 刘俊宏, 汪波, 王晶晶, 周银琼, 张可怡, 杨俊, 熊祖洪. 电子注入层迁移率对Rubrene/C₆₀基发光二极管半带隙开启电压的调控. 物理学报, 2024, 73(21): 217202. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240864
[2]	任兴, 于宏宇, 张勇. 基于BCPO发光材料近紫外有机发光二极管的电致发光效率与稳定性. 物理学报, 2024, 73(4): 047801. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231301
[3]	魏福贤, 刘俊宏, 彭腾, 汪波, 朱洪强, 陈晓莉, 熊祖洪. 利用热激子反向系间窜越的特征磁响应探测界面型OLED中的Dexter能量传递过程. 物理学报, 2023, 72(18): 187201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230998
[4]	赵茜, 陈敬, 彭腾, 刘俊宏, 汪波, 陈晓莉, 熊祖洪. 激基复合物有机发光二极管中系间窜越和反向系间窜越过程的非单调电流依赖关系. 物理学报, 2023, 72(16): 167201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230765
[5]	王辉耀, 魏福贤, 吴雨廷, 彭腾, 刘俊宏, 汪波, 熊祖洪. 激基复合物有机发光二极管中平衡载流子增强电荷转移态的反向系间窜越过程. 物理学报, 2023, 72(17): 177201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230949
[6]	保希, 关云霞, 李万娇, 宋家一, 陈丽佳, 徐爽, 彭柯敖, 牛连斌. 载流子阶梯效应调控有机发光二极管三线态激子的解离和散射. 物理学报, 2023, 72(21): 217101. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230851
[7]	吴雨廷, 朱洪强, 魏福贤, 王辉耀, 陈敬, 宁亚茹, 吴凤娇, 陈晓莉, 熊祖洪. 激基复合物与电致激基复合物共存体系中Dexter能量传递导致的负磁效率. 物理学报, 2022, 71(22): 227201. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20221288
[8]	刘萌娇, 张新稳, 王炯, 秦雅博, 陈月花, 黄维. 非周期微纳结构增强有机发光二极管光耦合输出的研究进展. 物理学报, 2018, 67(20): 207801. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20181209
[9]	张雅男, 王俊锋. 利用发光层梯度掺杂改善顶发射白光有机发光二极管光谱的稳定性. 物理学报, 2015, 64(9): 097801. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.097801
[10]	黄迪, 徐征, 赵谡玲. 使用PTB7作为阳极修饰层提高有机发光二极管的性能. 物理学报, 2014, 63(2): 027301. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.027301
[11]	刘佰全, 兰林锋, 邹建华, 彭俊彪. 具有新型双空穴注入层的有机发光二极管. 物理学报, 2013, 62(8): 087302. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.087302
[12]	焦威, 雷衍连, 张巧明, 刘亚莉, 陈林, 游胤涛, 熊祖洪. 有机发光二极管的光致磁电导效应. 物理学报, 2012, 61(18): 187305. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.187305
[13]	张勇, 刘亚莉, 焦威, 陈林, 熊祖洪. 有机发光器件的磁电导效应. 物理学报, 2012, 61(11): 117106. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.117106
[14]	刘南柳, 艾娜, 胡典钢, 余树福, 彭俊彪, 曹镛, 王坚. 旋涂方式对有机发光显示屏发光均匀性及性能的影响. 物理学报, 2011, 60(8): 087805. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.087805
[15]	杨洋, 陈淑芬, 谢军, 陈春燕, 邵茗, 郭旭, 黄维. 有机发光二极管光取出技术研究进展. 物理学报, 2011, 60(4): 047809. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.047809
[16]	张勇, 刘荣, 雷衍连, 陈平, 张巧明, 熊祖洪. 基于Alq3的有机发光二极管的磁电导效应. 物理学报, 2010, 59(8): 5817-5822. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.5817
[17]	张秀龙, 杨盛谊, 娄志东, 侯延冰. 有机电致发光器件的动态电学特性. 物理学报, 2007, 56(3): 1632-1636. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.1632
[18]	王军, 魏孝强, 饶海波, 成建波, 蒋亚东. 基于铱配合物材料的高效高稳定性有机发光二极管. 物理学报, 2007, 56(2): 1156-1161. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.1156
[19]	许雪梅, 彭景翠, 李宏建, 瞿述, 赵楚军, 罗小华. 有机层界面对双层有机发光二极管复合效率的影响. 物理学报, 2004, 53(1): 286-290. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.286
[20]	许雪梅, 彭景翠, 李宏建, 瞿述, 罗小华. 载流子迁移率对单层有机发光二极管复合效率的影响. 物理学报, 2002, 51(10): 2380-2385. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.2380

计量

文章访问数: 459
PDF下载量: 18
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板

利用有机磁效应研究电荷平衡影响激基复合物器件发光效率的物理机制