搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

一个新的海边光学湍流外尺度和Cn2的廓线模式

蔡俊 李学彬 詹国伟 武鹏飞 徐春燕 青春 吴晓庆

引用本文:
Citation:

一个新的海边光学湍流外尺度和Cn2的廓线模式

蔡俊, 李学彬, 詹国伟, 武鹏飞, 徐春燕, 青春, 吴晓庆

A new model for the profiles of optical turbulence outer scale and Cn2 on the coast

Cai Jun, Li Xue-Bin, Zhan Guo-Wei, Wu Peng-Fei, Xu Chun-Yan, Qing Chun, Wu Xiao-Qing
PDF
导出引用
  • 2016年12月13日至2017年1月2日期间,在茂名博贺海洋气象科学实验基地,采用自行研制的湍流气象探空仪,获取了30份海边温、湿、压、风速、风向和Cn2等探空数据.基于HMNSP99外尺度模式,利用海边的探空数据拟合得到一个茂名大气光学湍流外尺度经验公式.同时对实验测得的高空湍流廓线数据进行统计平均,然后基于Hufnagel-Valley模式拟合得到符合海边湍流廓线规律的统计平均模式(Cn2sea model).根据Tatarski高空湍流参数化方案,将用茂名外尺度公式估算的Cn2分别与探空测量的Cn2以及用其他外尺度模式估算的Cn2进行了比较.对其进行统计性分析发现,利用新拟合的茂名外尺度公式、HMNSP99,Dewan以及Coulman等外尺度模式计算的log10ft({Cn2)与实测值的整体相关系数分别为0.924,0.848,0.763和0.651,在变化趋势和量级上都表现出较好的一致性;以上四种外尺度模式估算结果的误差都很小,其整体平均绝对误差和平均相对误差分别为0.514和2.963%,0.627和3.612%,0.943和5.439%,0.766和4.417%,新拟合的外尺度模式的误差最小.进一步验证了新的海边外尺度和Cn2廓线模式的可靠性和有效性,此外还发现高空大气光学湍流的发生与风切变和温度梯度具有十分密切的关系,为光电工程在海边场景应用所需的大气光学湍流廓线模式提供支持.
    Atmospheric optical turbulence severely restricts the performances of electro-optical systems. The turbulent atmosphere causes the intensity of a light beam to fluctuate or scintillate, leads the light beam to wander and makes the images randomly displace, which directly relates to the refractive index structure parameter Cn2. Therefore the knowledge of Cn2 is essential to evaluate and to predict the effects of optical turbulence on electro-optical imagery systems. During the period from December 13, 2016 to January 2, 2017, 30 sets of sounding data, which include temperatures, humidities, pressures, wind speeds, wind directions and atmospheric refractive index structure parameters, are obtained by using a self-developed meteorological radiosonde for turbulence at Marine Meteorological Science Experiment Base at Bohe of Maoming. On the basis of the HMNSP99 outer scale model, an atmospheric optical turbulence outer scale formula of Maoming is obtained by fitting the sounding data. At the same time, the experimental data of the turbulence profiles are statistically averaged, and then based on the Hufnagel-Valley model, a statistical model is obtained, which is appropriate to the variation of the turbulence profile on the coast. According to Tatarski turbulence parameterization and the Maoming outer scale formula, the new estimated Cn2 values are compared with their experimental observations and the results from other already defined models, respectively. Statistical analysis shows that the overall correlation coefficients of log10(Cn2) between observed values and estimated values by using the new fitting Maoming outer scale formula, the HMNSP99 model, the Dewan model and the Coulman model are 0.924, 0.848, 0.763 and 0.651, respectively. Also, both the trends and magnitudes for these four outer scale models are consistent with each other. The errors of the above four outer scale models are very small:their overall average absolute errors and average relative errors are 0.514 and 2.963%, 0.627 and 3.612%, 0.943 and 5.439%, 0.766 and 4.417%, respectively, and the error of the Maoming outer scale model is smallest. The reliabilities and validities of the new outer scale and Cn2 models are further verified. In addition, it is found that the occurrence of upper air optical turbulence is closely related to wind shear and temperature gradient. The results support the prediction of the atmospheric optical turbulence profile required for electro-optical engineering on the coast.
      通信作者: 吴晓庆, xqwu@aiofm.ac.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号:41576185)和中科院科技创新基金(批准号:CXJJ)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Wu Xiao-Qing, xqwu@aiofm.ac.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41576185) and the Science and Technology Innovation Foundation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, China (Grant No. CXJJ).
    [1]

    Song Z F 1990 Applied Atmospheric Optics (Beijing: China Meteorological Press) pp67-70 (in Chinese) [宋正方1990应用大气光学基础(北京: 气象出版社) 第6770页]

    [2]

    Hutt D L 1999 Opt. Eng. 38 1288

    [3]

    Kunz G J, Moerman M M, Eijk A M J V, Dosshammel S M, Tsintikidis D 2004 Proc. SPIE 5237 81

    [4]

    Fried D L 1966 J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56 1380

    [5]

    Wyngaard J C, Izumi Y, Stuart A, Collins J R 1971 J. Opt. Soc. Am. 61 1646

    [6]

    Hufnagel R E 1974 Topical Meeting on Optical Propagation Through Turbulence Boulder, Colorado, July 9-11, 1974 p2453

    [7]

    Beland R R, Brown J H 1988 Phys. Scr. 37 419

    [8]

    Coulman C E, Vernin J, Coqueugniot Y, Caccia J L 1988 Appl. Opt. 27 155

    [9]

    Dewan E M, Good R E, Beland R, Brown J 1993 A Model for C_n^2(Optical Turbulence) Profiles Using Radiosonde Data(Phillips Laboratory, Hanscom AFB MA) Technical report No. PL-TR-93-2043

    [10]

    Vanzandt T E, Gage K S, Warnock J M 1981 Twentieth Conference on Radar Meteorology Boston, 1981 p129

    [11]

    Masciadri E, Vernin J, Bougeault P 1999 Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 137 185

    [12]

    Sun G, Weng N Q, Xiao L M 2008 High Power Laser and Particle Beams 20 183 (in Chinese) [孙刚, 翁宁泉, 肖黎明 2008 强激光与粒子束 20 183]

    [13]

    Qing C, Wu X Q, Li X B, Zhu W Y, Rao R Z, Mei H P 2015 Chin. J. Lasers 42 0913001 (in Chinese) [青春, 吴晓庆, 李学彬, 朱文越, 饶瑞中, 梅海平 2015 中国激光 42 0913001]

    [14]

    Beland R R, Brown J H, Good R E, Murphy E A 1988 Optical Turbulence Characterization of AMOS, 1985 (US Air Force Geophysics Laboratory, Hanscom AFB MA) Technical report No. AFGL-TR-88-0153

    [15]

    Miller M G, Zieske P L 1979 Turbulence Environment Characterization. (Rome Air Development Center, Griffiss AFB NY) Technical report No. RADC-TR-79-131

    [16]

    Jams R R, Rockway J W, Stoots L B, Julian A J, Hanson D W 1981 Submarine Laser Communications Evaluation Algorithm (Naval Ocean Systems Center) Technical report No. NOSC-TR-673

    [17]

    Wu X Q, Ma C S, Yuan R M, Zeng Z Y, Wang Y J 2003 Chin. J. Quantum Electron. 20 375 (in Chinese) [吴晓庆, 马成胜, 袁仁民,曾宗泳, 王英俭 2003 量子电子学报 20 375]

    [18]

    Tatarski V I 1961 Wave Propagation in A Turbulent Medium (New York: McGraw-Hill) pp46-51

    [19]

    Ruggiero F H, Debenedictis D A 2002 DOD High Performance Computer Users Group Conference Austin, Texas, January 13-14, 2002 p11

    [20]

    Qing C, Wu X Q, Li X B, Huang H H, Cai J 2015 High Power Laser and Particle Beams 27 061009 (in Chinese) [青春, 吴晓庆, 李学彬, 黄宏华, 蔡俊 2015强激光与粒子束 27 061009]

    [21]

    Wu X Q, Qian X M, Huang H H, Wang P, Cui C L, Qing C 2014 Acta Astronom. Sin. 55 144 (in Chinese) [吴晓庆, 钱仙妹, 黄宏华, 汪平, 崔朝龙, 青春 2014 天文学报 55 144]

  • [1]

    Song Z F 1990 Applied Atmospheric Optics (Beijing: China Meteorological Press) pp67-70 (in Chinese) [宋正方1990应用大气光学基础(北京: 气象出版社) 第6770页]

    [2]

    Hutt D L 1999 Opt. Eng. 38 1288

    [3]

    Kunz G J, Moerman M M, Eijk A M J V, Dosshammel S M, Tsintikidis D 2004 Proc. SPIE 5237 81

    [4]

    Fried D L 1966 J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56 1380

    [5]

    Wyngaard J C, Izumi Y, Stuart A, Collins J R 1971 J. Opt. Soc. Am. 61 1646

    [6]

    Hufnagel R E 1974 Topical Meeting on Optical Propagation Through Turbulence Boulder, Colorado, July 9-11, 1974 p2453

    [7]

    Beland R R, Brown J H 1988 Phys. Scr. 37 419

    [8]

    Coulman C E, Vernin J, Coqueugniot Y, Caccia J L 1988 Appl. Opt. 27 155

    [9]

    Dewan E M, Good R E, Beland R, Brown J 1993 A Model for C_n^2(Optical Turbulence) Profiles Using Radiosonde Data(Phillips Laboratory, Hanscom AFB MA) Technical report No. PL-TR-93-2043

    [10]

    Vanzandt T E, Gage K S, Warnock J M 1981 Twentieth Conference on Radar Meteorology Boston, 1981 p129

    [11]

    Masciadri E, Vernin J, Bougeault P 1999 Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 137 185

    [12]

    Sun G, Weng N Q, Xiao L M 2008 High Power Laser and Particle Beams 20 183 (in Chinese) [孙刚, 翁宁泉, 肖黎明 2008 强激光与粒子束 20 183]

    [13]

    Qing C, Wu X Q, Li X B, Zhu W Y, Rao R Z, Mei H P 2015 Chin. J. Lasers 42 0913001 (in Chinese) [青春, 吴晓庆, 李学彬, 朱文越, 饶瑞中, 梅海平 2015 中国激光 42 0913001]

    [14]

    Beland R R, Brown J H, Good R E, Murphy E A 1988 Optical Turbulence Characterization of AMOS, 1985 (US Air Force Geophysics Laboratory, Hanscom AFB MA) Technical report No. AFGL-TR-88-0153

    [15]

    Miller M G, Zieske P L 1979 Turbulence Environment Characterization. (Rome Air Development Center, Griffiss AFB NY) Technical report No. RADC-TR-79-131

    [16]

    Jams R R, Rockway J W, Stoots L B, Julian A J, Hanson D W 1981 Submarine Laser Communications Evaluation Algorithm (Naval Ocean Systems Center) Technical report No. NOSC-TR-673

    [17]

    Wu X Q, Ma C S, Yuan R M, Zeng Z Y, Wang Y J 2003 Chin. J. Quantum Electron. 20 375 (in Chinese) [吴晓庆, 马成胜, 袁仁民,曾宗泳, 王英俭 2003 量子电子学报 20 375]

    [18]

    Tatarski V I 1961 Wave Propagation in A Turbulent Medium (New York: McGraw-Hill) pp46-51

    [19]

    Ruggiero F H, Debenedictis D A 2002 DOD High Performance Computer Users Group Conference Austin, Texas, January 13-14, 2002 p11

    [20]

    Qing C, Wu X Q, Li X B, Huang H H, Cai J 2015 High Power Laser and Particle Beams 27 061009 (in Chinese) [青春, 吴晓庆, 李学彬, 黄宏华, 蔡俊 2015强激光与粒子束 27 061009]

    [21]

    Wu X Q, Qian X M, Huang H H, Wang P, Cui C L, Qing C 2014 Acta Astronom. Sin. 55 144 (in Chinese) [吴晓庆, 钱仙妹, 黄宏华, 汪平, 崔朝龙, 青春 2014 天文学报 55 144]

  • [1] 祝凤荣, 柳靖, 夏君集, 张丰, 刘虎. 基于MSISE-90研究高海拔宇宙线观测站处的大气深度廓线模型. 物理学报, 2024, 73(16): 169201. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240679
    [2] 胡运优, 徐亮, 沈先春, 束胜全, 徐睆垚, 邓亚颂, 徐寒扬, 刘建国, 刘文清. 基于大气廓线合成背景的目标气云透过率反演. 物理学报, 2023, 72(3): 033201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221670
    [3] 吴晓庆, 杨期科, 黄宏华, 青春, 胡晓丹, 王英俭. 大气光学湍流模式研究: ${\boldsymbol{C}}_{\boldsymbol{n}}^{\boldsymbol 2}$廓线模式. 物理学报, 2023, 72(6): 069201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221985
    [4] 徐自强, 吴晓庆, 许满满, 毕翠翠, 韩永, 邵士勇. 海洋上空折射率结构常数廓线估算. 物理学报, 2021, 70(24): 244204. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211201
    [5] 陆金波, 侯晓荣, 罗敏. 一类Hopf分岔系统的通用鲁棒稳定控制器设计方法. 物理学报, 2016, 65(6): 060502. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.060502
    [6] 韩舸, 龚威, 马昕, 相成志, 梁艾琳, 郑玉新. 地基CO2廓线探测差分吸收激光雷达. 物理学报, 2015, 64(24): 244206. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.244206
    [7] 王倩, 梅海平, 钱仙妹, 饶瑞中. 近地面大气光学湍流外尺度的实验研究. 物理学报, 2015, 64(22): 224216. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.224216
    [8] 王杨, 李昂, 谢品华, 陈浩, 徐晋, 吴丰成, 刘建国, 刘文清. 多轴差分吸收光谱技术反演气溶胶消光系数垂直廓线. 物理学报, 2013, 62(18): 180705. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.180705
    [9] 毕研盟, 廖蜜, 张鹏, 马刚. 应用一维变分法反演GPS掩星大气温湿廓线. 物理学报, 2013, 62(15): 159301. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.159301
    [10] 徐晋, 谢品华, 司福祺, 李昂, 周海金, 吴丰成, 王杨, 刘建国, 刘文清. 基于机载平台的NO2 垂直廓线反演灵敏度研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(10): 104214. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.104214
    [11] 张宇, 张晓娟, 方广有. 大尺度分层介质电特性参数的反演方法研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(4): 044204. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.044204
    [12] 岳平, 张强, 李耀辉, 王润元, 王胜, 孙旭映. 半干旱草原下垫面动量和感热总体输送系数参数化关系研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(9): 099202. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.099202
    [13] 王战, 董建峰, 刘锦景, 罗孝阳. 基于线变换的椭圆柱外隐身斗篷的设计研究. 物理学报, 2012, 61(20): 204101. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.204101
    [14] 程胡华, 钟中, 岑瑾, 邓少格. 估算大气重力波参数的垂直扰动廓线获取新方法. 物理学报, 2012, 61(18): 189201. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.189201
    [15] 何明元, 杜华栋, 龙智勇, 黄思训. 大气廓线参数反演中基于大气可反演指数的正则化参数选择方法. 物理学报, 2012, 61(2): 024205. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.024205
    [16] 屈卫卫, 张高龙, 乐小云. 利用双折叠模型对弹核为的熔合垒高度和位置的系统学分析. 物理学报, 2012, 61(15): 152501. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.152501
    [17] 郭帆, 李永东, 王洪广, 刘纯亮, 呼义翔, 张鹏飞, 马萌. Z箍缩装置外磁绝缘传输线全尺寸粒子模拟研究. 物理学报, 2011, 60(10): 102901. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.102901
    [18] 赵小峰, 黄思训. 垂直天线阵观测信息反演大气折射率廓线. 物理学报, 2011, 60(11): 119203. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.119203
    [19] 严碧歌, 赵婷婷. 应用多尺度化的基本尺度熵分析心率变异性. 物理学报, 2011, 60(7): 078701. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.078701
    [20] 黄晓林, 崔胜忠, 宁新宝, 卞春华. 心率变异性基本尺度熵的多尺度化研究. 物理学报, 2009, 58(12): 8160-8165. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.8160
计量
  • 文章访问数:  6747
  • PDF下载量:  279
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2017-06-08
  • 修回日期:  2017-10-12
  • 刊出日期:  2018-01-05

/

返回文章
返回