搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

近红外光刺激神经细胞钙离子光激活

耿俊娴 李少强 王诗琪 黄春 吕云杰 胡睿 屈军乐 刘丽炜

引用本文:
Citation:

近红外光刺激神经细胞钙离子光激活

耿俊娴, 李少强, 王诗琪, 黄春, 吕云杰, 胡睿, 屈军乐, 刘丽炜

Stimulating Ca2+ photoactivation of nerve cells by near-infrared light

Geng Jun-Xian, Li Shao-Qiang, Wang Shi-Qi, Huang Chun, Lü Yun-Jie, Hu Rui, Qu Jun-Le, Liu Li-Wei
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 钙离子(Ca2+)是细胞的主要信息传输通道, 研究Ca2+激活对阐述亚细胞层次生物过程具有重要意义, 光激活是目前研究细胞内Ca2+传输和控制的主要方式之一. 本文利用近红外脉冲激光刺激标记有金纳米棒(gold nanorods, GNRs)的人神经母细胞瘤细胞(SH-SY5Y)的Ca2+信号传导, 并利用钙离子指示剂(Fluo-4, AM)对其进行双光子荧光成像. 实验采用功率为0.5 mW, 波长为800 nm的激发光, 平均10 s就可实现Ca2+光激活, 标记GNRs的神经细胞Ca2+释放速度是未标记GNRs的6倍. 研究结果表明GNRs通过局域表面等离子体共振将脉冲激光瞬间转化为热量, 改变膜电容, 使细胞膜去极化并引发动作电位, 使细胞外Ca2+流入, 证明了借助GNRs来增强神经细胞Ca2+激活的可行性, 为神经细胞离子通道研究提供了一种光学手段.
    Calcium ions (Ca2+) play a key role of the nerve cells generating universal intracellular signals and controlling important functions. Ca2+ activation is of great significance for explaining the subcellular-level biological process. Light stimulated nerve cells to control intracellular signals and membrane activities has become a main method in neuroscience, and the photoactivation is one of the main ways to study intracellular Ca2+ transmission. Nerve cells can be directly stimulated by light to produce action potentials, but such techniques are inaccurate in the delivered light energy. To improve this, here in this work we show that gold nanorods (GNRs) can be conjugated to ligands to bound to human neuroblast cells (SH-SY5Y), and introduce an optical method of stimulating and monitoring Ca2+ signal in nerve cells in which the plasmonic excitation of GNRs is used. In this paper, we use confocal microscopy to display the 488 nm continuous wave laser irradiating SH-SY5Y cells with Ca2+ indicator (Fluo-4, AM) to check fluorescence. Near-infrared pulsed light at the plasmon resonance absorption peak of GNRs is used to stimulate Ca2+ signal transduction in SH-SY5Y labeled with GNRs, and Fluo-4, AM is used for two-photon excited fluorescence imaging. In addition, we use the pulsed laser with power of 0.5 mW and a wavelength of 800 nm. The Ca2+ activation can be achieved in 10 s on average. The release rate of Ca2+ from SH-SY5Y cells labeled with GNRs is 6 times that without GNRs. Next, in order to determine the source of changes in Ca2+, we use the BPATA to deplete the intracellular Ca2+, after 5 min, 200 μmol/L Ca2+ solution is added, and its ΔF/F is found to be more than 1.5 times that without GNRs. Thus, we believe that GNRs could enhance photoactivation through local surface plasmon resonance induced membrane depolarization and generate an action potential. The results prove the feasibility of using GNRs to enhance the activation of Ca2+ in nerve cells, and provide an optical means of lower photodamage and more precise for studying nerve cell ion channels. Our study demonstrates that enhancing photoactivation by GNRs could provide an outlook of basic research in neuroscience.
      通信作者: 屈军乐, jlqu@szu.edu.cn ; 刘丽炜, liulw@szu.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家级-国家自然科学基金(批准号:61935012/61722508/61525503/61620106016/61835009/61961136005)
      Corresponding author: Qu Jun-Le, jlqu@szu.edu.cn ; Liu Li-Wei, liulw@szu.edu.cn
    [1]

    Michael J H, Bernardo L S 2008 Neuron 59 902Google Scholar

    [2]

    Richard D F, Dong H W, Peter J B 2015 Neuron 86 374Google Scholar

    [3]

    John C W, Emilia E 2015 Biophys. J. 108 1934Google Scholar

    [4]

    Camilo R, Mariateresa T, Paolo M, Attilio M, Gianni C, Sergio M, Roberto R 2018 J. Neural Eng. 15 036016Google Scholar

    [5]

    Jean D, Luis H, Katrien M, Dries B, Dimiter P 2017 Front. Neurosci. 11 663Google Scholar

    [6]

    Lu C B, Wu X L, Ma H Z, Wang Q C, Wang Y K, Luo Y, Li C, Xu H 2019 Neural Plast . 2019 5271573Google Scholar

    [7]

    Robert K S, Joel V, Owen B, David A X N 2018 J. Neural Eng. 15 041004Google Scholar

    [8]

    Jacob G B, Edward S B 2011 Trends Cogn. Sci. 15 592Google Scholar

    [9]

    Yao J P, Hou W S, Yin Z Q 2012 Int J Ophthalmol. 5 517Google Scholar

    [10]

    Sonny G, Terence S L, Clare E E, Ilias T 2014 Biomed. Opt. Express 5 2896Google Scholar

    [11]

    Flavie L C, Charleen S, Éric B, Michel M, Paul D K 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 1Google Scholar

    [12]

    Paviolo C, Thompson A C, Yong J, Brown W G, Stoddart P R 2014 J. Neural Eng. 11 065002Google Scholar

    [13]

    de Boer W.D.A.M, Hirtz J J, Capretti A, Gregorkiewicz T, Izquierdo-Serra M, Han S, Dupre C, Shymkiv Y, Yuste R 2018 Light Sci. Appl. 7 100Google Scholar

    [14]

    Shapiro M G, Homma K, Villarreal S, Richter C P, Bezanilla F 2012 Nat. Commun. 3 736Google Scholar

    [15]

    João L C D S, Jeremy S T, Bobo D, Stephen B H K, David R P, Francisco B 2015 Neuron 86 207Google Scholar

    [16]

    Morven C, Orsolya K, John W M, Jonathan T, Paul P B, André V S, Yossi B 2016 PLoS One 11 e0155468Google Scholar

    [17]

    Silvia S, Aniello S M, Vito D M 2014 Gen. Physiol. Biophys. 33 121Google Scholar

    [18]

    Shen B L, Yan J S, Wang S Q, Zhou F F, Zhao Y H, Hu R, Qu J L, Liu L W 2020 Theranostics 10 1849Google Scholar

    [19]

    Lin F R, Pintu D, Zhao Y H, Shen B L, Hu R, Zhou F F, Liu L W, Qu J L 2020 Biomed. Opt. Express 11 149Google Scholar

    [20]

    Kyungsik E, Kyung M B, Sang B J, Sung J K, Jonghwan L 2018 Biophys. J. 115 1481Google Scholar

    [21]

    João L C D S, Okhil K N, Eunkeu Oh, Alan L H, Igor V, David R P, Francisco B, James B, Delehanty 2019 ACS Chem. Neurosci. 10 1478Google Scholar

    [22]

    Michael B R, Chad A M, George C S 2016 J. Phys. Chem. C 120 816Google Scholar

    [23]

    Vincenzo A, Roberto P, Marco F, Onofrio M M, Maria A I 2017 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29 203002Google Scholar

    [24]

    Ni W H, Kou X S, Yang Z, Wang J F 2008 ACS Nano 2 677Google Scholar

    [25]

    Sassaroli E, Li K C P, O’Neill B E 2009 Phys. Med. Biol. 54 5541Google Scholar

    [26]

    Ekici O, Harrison R K, Durr N J, Eversole D S, Lee M, Yakar A B 2008 J. Phys. D 41 185501Google Scholar

    [27]

    Luo L Q 2015 Principles of Neurobiology (New York: Garland Science) pp40−43

    [28]

    Roberta D A, Pasquale P, Giuseppe S 2017 Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 8 1Google Scholar

  • 图 1  双光子激发荧光共聚焦显微系统光路示意图(G&R Scanner为振镜扫描仪, LP为长通滤波片, PMT为光电倍增管)

    Fig. 1.  Schematic diagram of two-photon excited fluorescence confocal microscopy system. The abbreviations in the figure are as follows: G&R Scanner is a Galvo-resonance scanner, LP is a long-pass filter, and PMT is a photomultiplier tube.

    图 2  温度随时间t和距离x变化的函数 (a)时间一定时, 温度随着距离的增加而衰减; (b) 距离一定时, 温度随着时间的增加而衰减; 在此模型中, 选用520 W·cm–2, 间隔为0.5 ms的矩形脉冲作为激发光源

    Fig. 2.  Temperature as a function of time t and distance x: (a) When the distance is constant, the temperature decays with increasing time; (b) when the time is constant, the temperature decays with increasing distance. In this model, a rectangular pulse of 520 W·cm–2 with an interval of 0.5 ms is selected as the excitation light source.

    图 3  GNRs与GNRs-SA的(a) 可见近红外吸收光谱以及(b) TEM图(比例尺: 100 nm; 近红外区GNRs\GNRs-SA的吸收峰分别在820和800 nm)

    Fig. 3.  (a) Visible near-infrared absorption spectra and (b) TEM images of GNRs and GNRs-SA, scale bar: 100 nm. the absorption peaks of GNRs\GNRs-SA in the near infrared region were at 820 nm and 800 nm, respectively.

    图 4  仅Fluo-4, AM标记与Fluo-4, AM, Con A和GNRs-SA同时标记的SH-SY5Y细胞光激活成像 (a) Fluo-4, AM, Con A和GNRs-SA标记的SH-SY5Y不同时刻的荧光图像; (b) Fluo-4, AM标记的SH-SY5Y不同时刻的荧光图像; (c) Fluo-4, AM, Con A和GNRs-SA标记的SH-SY5Y相对荧光强度随时间变化的曲线, 数字“1, 2, 3, 4”跟(a)中图像的时间点(25 s, 54 s, 99 s, 116 s)相对应, 四条曲线对应(a)中不同颜色圈出的细胞; (d) Fluo-4, AM标记的SH-SY5Y相对荧光强度随时间变化的曲线, 数字“1, 2, 3, 4”跟(b)中图像的时间点(1 s, 32 s, 127 s, 187 s)相对应, 四条曲线对应(b)中不同颜色圈出的细胞

    Fig. 4.  Photoactivation SH-SY5Y cells imaging of only Fluo-4 labeled and labeled with Fluo-4, AM, Con A and GNRs-SA. (a) The fluorescence images of Fluo-4, AM and GNRs-SA labeled SH-SY5Y cells at different times. (b) the fluorescence images of Fluo-4, AM labeled SH-SY5Y cells at different times. (c) the changing of relative fluorescence intensity of Fluo-4, AM, Con A and GNRs-SA labeled SH-SY5Y cells with time. the numbers “1, 2, 3, 4” correspond to the time points (25 s, 54 s, 99 s, 116 s) of the image in (a), and the four curves correspond to the cells circled in different colors in (a). (d) The changing of relative fluorescence intensity of Fluo-4, AM labeled SH-SY5Y cells with time. the numbers “1, 2, 3, 4” correspond to the time points (1 s, 32 s, 127 s, 187 s) of the image in (b). four curves correspond to cells circled in different colors in (b).

    图 5  仅Fluo-4, AM标记和Fluo-4, AM, Con A和GNRs-SA同时标记的SH-SY5Y细胞光刺激的平均(细胞数n = 300)最小激发时间以及光激活引起相对荧光强度的变化值

    Fig. 5.  For Fluo-4, AM labeled and Fluo-4, AM, Con A and GNRs-SA labeled SH-SY5Y cells at the same time, the average photoactivation (cell number n = 300) minimum excitation time and the changes in relative fluorescence intensity caused by photoactivation.

    图 6  验证光激活时Ca2+的变化来源(其中FITC表示使用500—550 nm的带通滤波片来采集荧光, BF表示透射成像, Merge表示两通道的叠加图) (a) Fluo-4, AM染色后SH-SY5Y细胞的荧光图像和透射光图像 (比例尺: 50 μm); (b) Fluo-4, AM染色后SH-SY5Y细胞不同时刻的双光子荧光图像; (c) Fluo-4, AM与2 µmol/L Con A, GNRs-SA孵育后SH-SY5Y细胞的荧光图像和透射光图像 (比例尺: 50 μm); (d) Fluo-4, AM与2 µmol/L Con A, GNRs-SA 孵育后SH-SY5Y细胞不同时刻的双光子荧光图像; (e) 图(b)和(d)中红色虚线所圈区域的ΔF/F在相继添加200 µmol/L BPATA与200 µmol/L CaCl2后的变化曲线

    Fig. 6.  Verify the changing of the source of Ca2 + during photoactivation. Among them, FITC indicates the use of a 500—550 nm band-pass filter to collect fluorescence, BF indicates transmission imaging, and Merge indicates an overlay of two channels. (a) Fluorescence and TD image of SH-SY5Y cells with Fluo-4, AM staining (scale bar: 50 μm). (b) Two-photon fluorescence images of SH-SY5Y cells labeled with Fluo-4, AM at different times. (c) Fluorescence and TD images of SH-SY5Y cells with Fluo-4, AM staining after adding 2 µmol/L Con A, GNRs-SA (scale bar: 50 μm). (d) Time-series two-photon fluorescence images of SH-SY5Y cells labeled with Fluo-4, AM staining after adding 2 µmol/L Con A, GNRs-SA. (e) The change curves of the ΔF/F of the red virtual circle areas in panel (b) and (d) after adding 200 µmol/L BPATA and 200 µmol/L CaCl2.

  • [1]

    Michael J H, Bernardo L S 2008 Neuron 59 902Google Scholar

    [2]

    Richard D F, Dong H W, Peter J B 2015 Neuron 86 374Google Scholar

    [3]

    John C W, Emilia E 2015 Biophys. J. 108 1934Google Scholar

    [4]

    Camilo R, Mariateresa T, Paolo M, Attilio M, Gianni C, Sergio M, Roberto R 2018 J. Neural Eng. 15 036016Google Scholar

    [5]

    Jean D, Luis H, Katrien M, Dries B, Dimiter P 2017 Front. Neurosci. 11 663Google Scholar

    [6]

    Lu C B, Wu X L, Ma H Z, Wang Q C, Wang Y K, Luo Y, Li C, Xu H 2019 Neural Plast . 2019 5271573Google Scholar

    [7]

    Robert K S, Joel V, Owen B, David A X N 2018 J. Neural Eng. 15 041004Google Scholar

    [8]

    Jacob G B, Edward S B 2011 Trends Cogn. Sci. 15 592Google Scholar

    [9]

    Yao J P, Hou W S, Yin Z Q 2012 Int J Ophthalmol. 5 517Google Scholar

    [10]

    Sonny G, Terence S L, Clare E E, Ilias T 2014 Biomed. Opt. Express 5 2896Google Scholar

    [11]

    Flavie L C, Charleen S, Éric B, Michel M, Paul D K 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 1Google Scholar

    [12]

    Paviolo C, Thompson A C, Yong J, Brown W G, Stoddart P R 2014 J. Neural Eng. 11 065002Google Scholar

    [13]

    de Boer W.D.A.M, Hirtz J J, Capretti A, Gregorkiewicz T, Izquierdo-Serra M, Han S, Dupre C, Shymkiv Y, Yuste R 2018 Light Sci. Appl. 7 100Google Scholar

    [14]

    Shapiro M G, Homma K, Villarreal S, Richter C P, Bezanilla F 2012 Nat. Commun. 3 736Google Scholar

    [15]

    João L C D S, Jeremy S T, Bobo D, Stephen B H K, David R P, Francisco B 2015 Neuron 86 207Google Scholar

    [16]

    Morven C, Orsolya K, John W M, Jonathan T, Paul P B, André V S, Yossi B 2016 PLoS One 11 e0155468Google Scholar

    [17]

    Silvia S, Aniello S M, Vito D M 2014 Gen. Physiol. Biophys. 33 121Google Scholar

    [18]

    Shen B L, Yan J S, Wang S Q, Zhou F F, Zhao Y H, Hu R, Qu J L, Liu L W 2020 Theranostics 10 1849Google Scholar

    [19]

    Lin F R, Pintu D, Zhao Y H, Shen B L, Hu R, Zhou F F, Liu L W, Qu J L 2020 Biomed. Opt. Express 11 149Google Scholar

    [20]

    Kyungsik E, Kyung M B, Sang B J, Sung J K, Jonghwan L 2018 Biophys. J. 115 1481Google Scholar

    [21]

    João L C D S, Okhil K N, Eunkeu Oh, Alan L H, Igor V, David R P, Francisco B, James B, Delehanty 2019 ACS Chem. Neurosci. 10 1478Google Scholar

    [22]

    Michael B R, Chad A M, George C S 2016 J. Phys. Chem. C 120 816Google Scholar

    [23]

    Vincenzo A, Roberto P, Marco F, Onofrio M M, Maria A I 2017 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29 203002Google Scholar

    [24]

    Ni W H, Kou X S, Yang Z, Wang J F 2008 ACS Nano 2 677Google Scholar

    [25]

    Sassaroli E, Li K C P, O’Neill B E 2009 Phys. Med. Biol. 54 5541Google Scholar

    [26]

    Ekici O, Harrison R K, Durr N J, Eversole D S, Lee M, Yakar A B 2008 J. Phys. D 41 185501Google Scholar

    [27]

    Luo L Q 2015 Principles of Neurobiology (New York: Garland Science) pp40−43

    [28]

    Roberta D A, Pasquale P, Giuseppe S 2017 Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 8 1Google Scholar

  • [1] 张洪硕, 周勇壮, 沈咏, 邹宏新. 线型离子阱中钙离子库仑晶体结构和运动轨迹模拟. 物理学报, 2023, 72(1): 013701. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221674
    [2] 喻欢欢, 张晨爽, 林丹樱, 于斌, 屈军乐. 基于高速相位型空间光调制器的双光子多焦点结构光显微技术. 物理学报, 2021, 70(9): 098701. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201797
    [3] 袁佳卉, 杨晓阔, 张斌, 陈亚博, 钟军, 危波, 宋明旭, 崔焕卿. 混合时钟驱动的自旋神经元器件激活特性和计算性能. 物理学报, 2021, 70(20): 207502. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210611
    [4] 郭良浩, 王少萌, 杨利霞, 王凯程, 马佳路, 周俊, 宫玉彬. 太赫兹波在神经细胞中传输的弱谐振效应. 物理学报, 2021, 70(24): 240301. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211677
    [5] 张益溢, 吴佳琛, 郝然, 金尚忠, 曹良才. 基于数字全息的血红细胞显微成像技术. 物理学报, 2020, 69(16): 164201. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200357
    [6] 管桦, 黄垚, 李承斌, 高克林. 高准确度的钙离子光频标. 物理学报, 2018, 67(16): 164202. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180876
    [7] 侯国辉, 罗腾, 陈秉灵, 刘杰, 林子扬, 陈丹妮, 屈军乐. 双光子荧光与相干反斯托克斯拉曼散射显微成像技术的实验研究. 物理学报, 2017, 66(10): 104204. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.104204
    [8] 刘鸿吉, 刘双龙, 牛憨笨, 陈丹妮, 刘伟. 基于环形抽运光的红外超分辨显微成像方法. 物理学报, 2016, 65(23): 233601. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.233601
    [9] 邱骏鹏, 梁闰富, 彭晓, 李亚晖, 刘立新, 尹君, 屈军乐, 牛憨笨. 多色双光子激发荧光显微技术实验研究. 物理学报, 2015, 64(4): 048701. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.048701
    [10] 白永强, 朱星. 单个心肌细胞中随机钙火花诱发的钙离子螺旋波. 物理学报, 2012, 61(15): 158203. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.158203
    [11] 陈丹妮, 刘磊, 于斌, 牛憨笨. HeLa细胞突起中微丝束的纳米分辨荧光成像. 物理学报, 2010, 59(10): 6948-6954. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.6948
    [12] 刘立新, 屈军乐, 林子扬, 陈丹妮, 许改霞, 胡 涛, 郭宝平, 牛憨笨. 双光子激发时间分辨荧光光谱测量技术. 物理学报, 2006, 55(12): 6281-6286. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.6281
    [13] 杨志平, 刘玉峰. Eu2+激活的Ca3SiO5绿色荧光粉的制备和发光特性研究. 物理学报, 2006, 55(9): 4946-4950. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.4946
    [14] 林子扬, 付 哲, 刘立新, 胡 涛, 屈军乐, 郭宝平, 牛憨笨. 双光子阵列点激发同时多维荧光信息的处理. 物理学报, 2006, 55(12): 6701-6707. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.6701
    [15] 蔡 理, 马西奎, 王 森. 量子细胞神经网络的超混沌特性研究. 物理学报, 2003, 52(12): 3002-3006. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.3002
    [16] 王宏霞, 何 晨. 细胞神经网络的动力学行为. 物理学报, 2003, 52(10): 2409-2414. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.2409
    [17] 王 琛, 袁景和, 王桂英, 徐至展. 入射光的偏振特性对全内反射荧光显微术中荧光激发的影响. 物理学报, 2003, 52(12): 3014-3019. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.3014
    [18] 胡晓, 洪方煜, 邬良能. 四能级和准四能级激活离子的最佳掺杂浓度. 物理学报, 2002, 51(9): 2002-2010. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.2002
    [19] 唐志列, 梁瑞生, 常鸿森. 双光子和多光子共焦显微镜的成像理论. 物理学报, 2000, 49(6): 1076-1080. doi: 10.7498/aps.49.1076
    [20] 冯勋立, 何林生, 柳永亮. 压缩真空态光场中两能级原子的双光子荧光的反聚束效应. 物理学报, 1997, 46(9): 1718-1724. doi: 10.7498/aps.46.1718
计量
  • 文章访问数:  9443
  • PDF下载量:  146
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-04-02
  • 修回日期:  2020-05-01
  • 上网日期:  2020-05-14
  • 刊出日期:  2020-08-05

/

返回文章
返回