-
胆红素是人体胆汁中的主要色素, 与人体健康密切相关. 结合荧光蛋白的胆红素分子代表一类新型荧光发色团, 在生物成像和生物传感领域有着重要应用. 本文结合隐式溶剂模型和线性响应含时密度泛函理论方法计算了胆红素分子最低单重激发态的垂直激发能、振子强度和垂直发射能. 以实验测量值和高水平RI-ADC(2)计算值作为参考, 系统考察了一系列密度泛函方法的预测表现, 结果发现最优化调控区间分离密度泛函方法整体表现最优, 预测的绝对误差和相对误差最小. 这得益于泛函中包含适宜的准确交换项比例能够产生既不离域也不局域的电子结构. 在最优化调控泛函方法计算的波函数基础上, 基于空穴-电子分析和片段间电荷转移方法定量表征了胆红素分子最低单重激发态, 发现其具有杂化局域-电荷转移的激发特征. 相信本工作可以为今后研究胆红素分子的激发态动力学过程和光谱性质提供重要理论依据, 该最优化调控理论模型也可以为接下来其他生物分子体系的激发态性质研究提供可靠、高效的理论工具.Bilirubin is the main pigment in human bile, which is closely related to human health. Bilirubin combining with fluorescent protein represents a new type of fluorescent chromophore and has important applications in the field of biological imaging and biosensor. Due to the lack of efficient and accurate electronic structure methods, the electronic structure and excited-state properties of bilirubin molecule are not characterized quantitatively and accurately. Firstly, the vertical absorption energy, oscillator strength and vertical emission energy of the lowest singlet excited state of bilirubin molecule are calculated by combining the implicit solvent model and the linear response time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) method. Compared to the experimental data and high-level RI-ADC(2) calculation, the prediction performance of a series of density functional methods is systematically investigated. The results show that the optimally-tuned range separated density functional method has the best overall performance and the minimum absolute and relative errors. This is obviously due to the fact that the suitable proportion of exact exchange included in density functionals can produce neither delocalized nor localized electronic structures. Based on the produced wavefunction by the optimally-tuned method, the excited-state characteristics of the S1 state of bilirubin molecule indicate a hybrid local and charge transfer excitation, based on the quantitative characterization using hole-electron analysis and interfragment charge transfer method. This work can provide a theoretical basis for the study of excited-state dynamics and spectral properties of bilirubin molecules and the optimally tuned range-separated DFT method also provide a reliable and efficient theoretical tool to study the excited-state properties of other biomolecular systems in the future.
-
Keywords:
- bilirubin /
- density functional theory /
- optimal tuning /
- excited-state character
[1] Stocker R, Yamamoto Y, Mcdonagh A F, Glazer A N, Ames B N 1987 Science 235 1043Google Scholar
[2] Fevery J 2008 Liver Int. 28 592Google Scholar
[3] Hissi E G V, Martinez J C G, Zamarbide G N, Estrada M R, Jensen S J K, Tomas-Vert F, Csizmadia I G 2009 J. Mol. Struc.: THEOCHEM 911 24Google Scholar
[4] Carreira-Blanco C, Singer P, Diller R, Lustres J L P 2016 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 7148Google Scholar
[5] Person R V, Peterson B R, Lightner D A 1994 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116 42Google Scholar
[6] Nogales D, Lightner D A 1995 J. Biol. Chem. 270 73Google Scholar
[7] Boiadjiev S E, Watters K, Wolf S, Lai B N, Welch W H, McDonagh A F, Lightner D A 2004 Biochemistry 43 15617Google Scholar
[8] Lightner D A, Holmes D L, McDonagh A F 1996 J. Biol. Chem. 271 2397Google Scholar
[9] Braslavsky S E, Holzwarth A R, Schaffner K 1983 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 22 656Google Scholar
[10] Zietz B, Macpherson A N, Gillbro T 2004 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 6 4535Google Scholar
[11] Zietz B, Gillbro T 2007 J. Phys. Chem. B 111 11997Google Scholar
[12] Cao X D, Zhang C C, Gao Z H, Liu Y Y, Zhao Y Z, Yang Y, Chen J Q, Jimenez R, Xu J H 2019 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21 2365Google Scholar
[13] Zietz B, Blomgren F 2006 Chem. Phys. Lett. 420 556Google Scholar
[14] Fabiano E, Della Sala F, Cingolani R, Weimer M, Görling A 2005 J. Phys. Chem. A 109 3078Google Scholar
[15] Hammond J R, Kowalski K 2009 J. Chem. Phys. 130 194108Google Scholar
[16] Budzák Š, Scalmani G, Jacquemin D 2017 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13 6237Google Scholar
[17] Hedin L 1965 Phys. Rev. 139 A796Google Scholar
[18] Hybertsen M S, Louie S G 1986 Phys. Rev. B 34 5390Google Scholar
[19] Kohn W, Sham L J 1965 Phys. Rev. 140 A1133Google Scholar
[20] Cohen A J, Mori-Sanchez P, Yang W T 2011 Chem. Rev. 112 289
[21] Jacquemin D, Wathelet V, Perpète E A, Adamo C 2009 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 5 2420Google Scholar
[22] Tian X H, Sun H T, Zhang Q S, Adachi C 2016 Chin. Chem. Lett. 27 1445Google Scholar
[23] Sun H T, Autschbach J 2013 ChemPhysChem 14 2450Google Scholar
[24] Jiang Y R, Hu Z B, Zhou B, Zhong C, Sun Z R, Sun H T 2019 J. Phys. Chem. C 123 5616Google Scholar
[25] Sutton C, Sears J S, Coropceanu V, Brédas J 2013 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4 919Google Scholar
[26] Stein T, Kronik L, Baer R 2009 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 2818Google Scholar
[27] Sun H T, Zhong C, Brédas J 2015 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11 3851Google Scholar
[28] Penfold T J 2015 J. Phys. Chem. C 119 13535Google Scholar
[29] Kronik L, Stein T, Refaely-Abramson S, Baer R 2012 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8 1515Google Scholar
[30] 孙海涛, 钟成, 孙真荣 2016 物理化学学报 32 2197Google Scholar
Sun H T, Zhong C, Sun Z R 2016 Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 32 2197Google Scholar
[31] Körzdörfer T, Sears J S, Sutton C, Brédas J 2011 J. Chem. Phys. 135 204107Google Scholar
[32] Baer R, Livshits E, Salzner U 2010 Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 61 85Google Scholar
[33] Stein T, Kronik L, Baer R 2009 J. Chem. Phys. 131 244119Google Scholar
[34] Becke A D 1993 J. Chem. Phys. 98 5648Google Scholar
[35] Lee C, Yang W T, Parr R G 1988 Phys. Rev. B 37 785Google Scholar
[36] Grimme S, Ehrlich S, Goerigk L 2011 J. Comput. Chem. 32 1456Google Scholar
[37] Ditchfield R, Hehre W J, Pople J A 1971 J. Chem. Phys. 54 724Google Scholar
[38] Hehre W J, Ditchfield R, Pople J A 1972 J. Chem. Phys. 56 2257Google Scholar
[39] Hariharan P C, Pople J A 1973 Theor. Chim. Acta 28 213Google Scholar
[40] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865Google Scholar
[41] Yu H S, He X, Li S L, Truhlar D G 2016 Chem. Sci. 7 5032Google Scholar
[42] Zhao Y, Truhlar D G 2008 Theor. Chem. Acc. 120 215Google Scholar
[43] Zhao Y, Truhlar D G 2006 J. Phys. Chem. A 110 13126Google Scholar
[44] Yanai T, Tew D P, Handy N C 2004 Chem. Phys. Lett. 393 51Google Scholar
[45] Vydrov O A, Scuseria G E 2006 J. Chem. Phys. 125 234109Google Scholar
[46] Chai J D, Head-Gordon M 2008 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10 6615Google Scholar
[47] Peverati R, Truhlar D G 2011 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2 2810Google Scholar
[48] Goerigk L, Grimme S 2010 J. Chem. Phys. 132 184103Google Scholar
[49] Trofimov A B, Schirmer J 1995 J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. 28 2299Google Scholar
[50] Schäfer A, Horn H, Ahlrichs R 1992 J. Chem. Phys. 97 2571Google Scholar
[51] Schäfer A, Huber C, Ahlrichs R 1994 J. Chem. Phys. 100 5829Google Scholar
[52] Weigend F, Ahlrichs R 2005 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7 3297Google Scholar
[53] Kumagai A, Ando R, Miyatake H, Greimel P, Kobayashi T, Hirabayashi Y, Shimogori T, Miyawaki A 2013 Cell 153 1602Google Scholar
[54] Mennucci B 2012 Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci. 2 386Google Scholar
[55] Tomasi J, Mennucci B, Cammi R 2005 Chem. Rev. 105 2999Google Scholar
[56] Marenich A V, Cramer C J, Truhlar D G 2009 J. Phys. Chem. B 113 6378Google Scholar
[57] Klamt A, Schüürmann G 1993 J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 799
[58] Frisch M J, Trucks G W, Schlegel H B, Scuseria G E, Robb M A, Cheeseman J R, Scalmani G, Barone V, Petersson G A, Nakatsuji H, Li X, Caricato M, Marenich A V, Bloino J, Janesko B G, Gomperts R, Mennucci B, Hratchian H P, Ortiz J V, Izmaylov A F, Sonnenberg J L, Williams, Ding F, Lipparini F, Egidi F, Goings J, Peng B, Petrone A, Henderson T, Ranasinghe D, Zakrzewski V G, Gao J, Rega N, Zheng G, Liang W, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Throssell K, Montgomery J J A, Peralta J E, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M J, Heyd J J, Brothers E N, Kudin K N, Staroverov V N, Keith T A, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A P, Burant J C, Iyengar S S, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Millam J M, Klene M, Adamo C, Cammi R, Ochterski J W, Martin R L, Morokuma K, Farkas O, Foresman J B, Fox D J 2013 Gaussian 09 Revision E. 01 Wallingford: Gaussian Inc
[59] Frisch M J, Trucks G W, Schlegel H B, Scuseria G E, Robb M A, Cheeseman J R, Scalmani G, Barone V, Petersson G A, Nakatsuji H, Li X, Caricato M, Marenich A V, Bloino J, Janesko B G, Gomperts R, Mennucci B, Hratchian H P, Ortiz J V, Izmaylov A F, Sonnenberg J L, Williams, Ding F, Lipparini F, Egidi F, Goings J, Peng B, Petrone A, Henderson T, Ranasinghe D, Zakrzewski V G, Gao J, Rega N, Zheng G, Liang W, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Throssell K, Montgomery J J A, Peralta J E, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M J, Heyd J J, Brothers E N, Kudin K N, Staroverov V N, Keith T A, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A P, Burant J C, Iyengar S S, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Millam J M, Klene M, Adamo C, Cammi R, Ochterski J W, Martin R L, Morokuma K, Farkas O, Foresman J B, Fox D J 2016 Gaussian 16 Revision A. 03 Wallingford: Gaussian Inc
[60] Neese F 2012 Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci. 2 73Google Scholar
[61] Ahlrichs R, Bär M, Häser M, Horn H, Kölmel C 1989 Chem. Phys. Lett. 162 165Google Scholar
[62] Lu T, Chen F W 2012 J. Comput. Chem. 33 580Google Scholar
[63] Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K 1996 J. Mol. Graphics 14 33Google Scholar
-
表 1 基组对计算的垂直激发能(EVA)的影响
Table 1. Influence of basis set on the calculated vertical excitation energy (EVA).
表 2 各种理论方法计算胆红素分子的垂直激发能(EVA)、振子强度(f )和垂直发射能(EVE)以及与实验值相比的绝对误差和相对误差
Table 2. Vertical absorption energies (EVA), oscillator strength (f ) and vertical emission energies (EVE) of bilirubin and the absolute errors and relative errors compared to the available experimental data.
ω EVA/eV f (S1) AE/eV RE/% E VE/eV AE/eV RE/% PBE — 1.83 0.02 -0.90 33 1.68 -0.71 30 B3LYP — 2.48 0.12 -0.25 9 2.25 -0.14 6 MN15 — 2.81 1.21 0.08 3 2.40 0.01 0.4 M062X — 2.91 1.30 0.18 7 2.46 0.07 3 M06HF — 3.12 1.42 0.39 14 2.52 0.13 6 CAM-B3LYP 0.330 2.91 1.33 0.18 7 2.45 0.06 3 LC-ωPBE 0.400 3.11 1.43 0.38 14 2.54 0.15 6 ω B97XD 0.200 2.94 1.36 0.21 8 2.46 0.07 3 M11 0.250 3.01 1.40 0.28 10 2.49 0.10 4 LC-ω PBE* 0.178 2.76 1.20 0.03 1 2.36 -0.03 1 ω B97XD* 0.137 2.85 1.28 0.12 4 2.43 0.04 2 B2 GPPLYP — 2.92 1.13 0.19 7 — — — RI-ADC(2) — 2.69 1.06 -0.04 1 — — — EXP a — 2.73 — — — 2.39 — — a Experimental values are taken from Refs. [12,53]. 表 3 胆红素分子最低单重激发态的各片段电子净变化量以及片段间电子转移量
Table 3. Net change of each fragment and electron transfer between fragments for lowest singlet excited state of bilirubin molecule.
Electron transfer between fragments 1 2 3 1 0.109 0.418 0.002 2 0.095 0.364 0.002 3 0.002 0.008 0.000 Net change of
each fragment–0.323 0.329 –0.006 -
[1] Stocker R, Yamamoto Y, Mcdonagh A F, Glazer A N, Ames B N 1987 Science 235 1043Google Scholar
[2] Fevery J 2008 Liver Int. 28 592Google Scholar
[3] Hissi E G V, Martinez J C G, Zamarbide G N, Estrada M R, Jensen S J K, Tomas-Vert F, Csizmadia I G 2009 J. Mol. Struc.: THEOCHEM 911 24Google Scholar
[4] Carreira-Blanco C, Singer P, Diller R, Lustres J L P 2016 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 7148Google Scholar
[5] Person R V, Peterson B R, Lightner D A 1994 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116 42Google Scholar
[6] Nogales D, Lightner D A 1995 J. Biol. Chem. 270 73Google Scholar
[7] Boiadjiev S E, Watters K, Wolf S, Lai B N, Welch W H, McDonagh A F, Lightner D A 2004 Biochemistry 43 15617Google Scholar
[8] Lightner D A, Holmes D L, McDonagh A F 1996 J. Biol. Chem. 271 2397Google Scholar
[9] Braslavsky S E, Holzwarth A R, Schaffner K 1983 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 22 656Google Scholar
[10] Zietz B, Macpherson A N, Gillbro T 2004 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 6 4535Google Scholar
[11] Zietz B, Gillbro T 2007 J. Phys. Chem. B 111 11997Google Scholar
[12] Cao X D, Zhang C C, Gao Z H, Liu Y Y, Zhao Y Z, Yang Y, Chen J Q, Jimenez R, Xu J H 2019 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21 2365Google Scholar
[13] Zietz B, Blomgren F 2006 Chem. Phys. Lett. 420 556Google Scholar
[14] Fabiano E, Della Sala F, Cingolani R, Weimer M, Görling A 2005 J. Phys. Chem. A 109 3078Google Scholar
[15] Hammond J R, Kowalski K 2009 J. Chem. Phys. 130 194108Google Scholar
[16] Budzák Š, Scalmani G, Jacquemin D 2017 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13 6237Google Scholar
[17] Hedin L 1965 Phys. Rev. 139 A796Google Scholar
[18] Hybertsen M S, Louie S G 1986 Phys. Rev. B 34 5390Google Scholar
[19] Kohn W, Sham L J 1965 Phys. Rev. 140 A1133Google Scholar
[20] Cohen A J, Mori-Sanchez P, Yang W T 2011 Chem. Rev. 112 289
[21] Jacquemin D, Wathelet V, Perpète E A, Adamo C 2009 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 5 2420Google Scholar
[22] Tian X H, Sun H T, Zhang Q S, Adachi C 2016 Chin. Chem. Lett. 27 1445Google Scholar
[23] Sun H T, Autschbach J 2013 ChemPhysChem 14 2450Google Scholar
[24] Jiang Y R, Hu Z B, Zhou B, Zhong C, Sun Z R, Sun H T 2019 J. Phys. Chem. C 123 5616Google Scholar
[25] Sutton C, Sears J S, Coropceanu V, Brédas J 2013 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4 919Google Scholar
[26] Stein T, Kronik L, Baer R 2009 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 2818Google Scholar
[27] Sun H T, Zhong C, Brédas J 2015 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11 3851Google Scholar
[28] Penfold T J 2015 J. Phys. Chem. C 119 13535Google Scholar
[29] Kronik L, Stein T, Refaely-Abramson S, Baer R 2012 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8 1515Google Scholar
[30] 孙海涛, 钟成, 孙真荣 2016 物理化学学报 32 2197Google Scholar
Sun H T, Zhong C, Sun Z R 2016 Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 32 2197Google Scholar
[31] Körzdörfer T, Sears J S, Sutton C, Brédas J 2011 J. Chem. Phys. 135 204107Google Scholar
[32] Baer R, Livshits E, Salzner U 2010 Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 61 85Google Scholar
[33] Stein T, Kronik L, Baer R 2009 J. Chem. Phys. 131 244119Google Scholar
[34] Becke A D 1993 J. Chem. Phys. 98 5648Google Scholar
[35] Lee C, Yang W T, Parr R G 1988 Phys. Rev. B 37 785Google Scholar
[36] Grimme S, Ehrlich S, Goerigk L 2011 J. Comput. Chem. 32 1456Google Scholar
[37] Ditchfield R, Hehre W J, Pople J A 1971 J. Chem. Phys. 54 724Google Scholar
[38] Hehre W J, Ditchfield R, Pople J A 1972 J. Chem. Phys. 56 2257Google Scholar
[39] Hariharan P C, Pople J A 1973 Theor. Chim. Acta 28 213Google Scholar
[40] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865Google Scholar
[41] Yu H S, He X, Li S L, Truhlar D G 2016 Chem. Sci. 7 5032Google Scholar
[42] Zhao Y, Truhlar D G 2008 Theor. Chem. Acc. 120 215Google Scholar
[43] Zhao Y, Truhlar D G 2006 J. Phys. Chem. A 110 13126Google Scholar
[44] Yanai T, Tew D P, Handy N C 2004 Chem. Phys. Lett. 393 51Google Scholar
[45] Vydrov O A, Scuseria G E 2006 J. Chem. Phys. 125 234109Google Scholar
[46] Chai J D, Head-Gordon M 2008 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10 6615Google Scholar
[47] Peverati R, Truhlar D G 2011 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2 2810Google Scholar
[48] Goerigk L, Grimme S 2010 J. Chem. Phys. 132 184103Google Scholar
[49] Trofimov A B, Schirmer J 1995 J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. 28 2299Google Scholar
[50] Schäfer A, Horn H, Ahlrichs R 1992 J. Chem. Phys. 97 2571Google Scholar
[51] Schäfer A, Huber C, Ahlrichs R 1994 J. Chem. Phys. 100 5829Google Scholar
[52] Weigend F, Ahlrichs R 2005 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7 3297Google Scholar
[53] Kumagai A, Ando R, Miyatake H, Greimel P, Kobayashi T, Hirabayashi Y, Shimogori T, Miyawaki A 2013 Cell 153 1602Google Scholar
[54] Mennucci B 2012 Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci. 2 386Google Scholar
[55] Tomasi J, Mennucci B, Cammi R 2005 Chem. Rev. 105 2999Google Scholar
[56] Marenich A V, Cramer C J, Truhlar D G 2009 J. Phys. Chem. B 113 6378Google Scholar
[57] Klamt A, Schüürmann G 1993 J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 799
[58] Frisch M J, Trucks G W, Schlegel H B, Scuseria G E, Robb M A, Cheeseman J R, Scalmani G, Barone V, Petersson G A, Nakatsuji H, Li X, Caricato M, Marenich A V, Bloino J, Janesko B G, Gomperts R, Mennucci B, Hratchian H P, Ortiz J V, Izmaylov A F, Sonnenberg J L, Williams, Ding F, Lipparini F, Egidi F, Goings J, Peng B, Petrone A, Henderson T, Ranasinghe D, Zakrzewski V G, Gao J, Rega N, Zheng G, Liang W, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Throssell K, Montgomery J J A, Peralta J E, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M J, Heyd J J, Brothers E N, Kudin K N, Staroverov V N, Keith T A, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A P, Burant J C, Iyengar S S, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Millam J M, Klene M, Adamo C, Cammi R, Ochterski J W, Martin R L, Morokuma K, Farkas O, Foresman J B, Fox D J 2013 Gaussian 09 Revision E. 01 Wallingford: Gaussian Inc
[59] Frisch M J, Trucks G W, Schlegel H B, Scuseria G E, Robb M A, Cheeseman J R, Scalmani G, Barone V, Petersson G A, Nakatsuji H, Li X, Caricato M, Marenich A V, Bloino J, Janesko B G, Gomperts R, Mennucci B, Hratchian H P, Ortiz J V, Izmaylov A F, Sonnenberg J L, Williams, Ding F, Lipparini F, Egidi F, Goings J, Peng B, Petrone A, Henderson T, Ranasinghe D, Zakrzewski V G, Gao J, Rega N, Zheng G, Liang W, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Throssell K, Montgomery J J A, Peralta J E, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M J, Heyd J J, Brothers E N, Kudin K N, Staroverov V N, Keith T A, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A P, Burant J C, Iyengar S S, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Millam J M, Klene M, Adamo C, Cammi R, Ochterski J W, Martin R L, Morokuma K, Farkas O, Foresman J B, Fox D J 2016 Gaussian 16 Revision A. 03 Wallingford: Gaussian Inc
[60] Neese F 2012 Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci. 2 73Google Scholar
[61] Ahlrichs R, Bär M, Häser M, Horn H, Kölmel C 1989 Chem. Phys. Lett. 162 165Google Scholar
[62] Lu T, Chen F W 2012 J. Comput. Chem. 33 580Google Scholar
[63] Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K 1996 J. Mol. Graphics 14 33Google Scholar
计量
- 文章访问数: 8296
- PDF下载量: 155
- 被引次数: 0