-
Within an oscillating field with high frequency, electron-positron pairs can be generated from vacuum as the result of multi-photon transition process. In this paper, through the computational quantum field theory and the split operator technique, we use a numerical method to solve the spatiotemporally dependent Dirac equation, the result of which enables us to discuss the process of creating electron-positron pair under a time-dependent and spatially localized external field. By monitoring the total number and the energy distribution of created pairs, the effect of the field width on the creating electron-positron pair is discussed. For a wide width, the symmetric transition of single photon transition is dominant, because the momentum of the transition particle is approximately conserved due to a gradually varying space. For an oscillating field with frequency that exceeds the threshold $ 2mc^2$ , the energy of a single-photon is sufficient to cross the energy gap between the positive energy continuum and the negative energy continuum. As a result, the electron-positron pairs will be generated continuously, where a transition with symmetric energy has the maximum probability. Meanwhile, higher-order photon transition also arises, especially for three-photon transition with one photon transition completely inside the negative energy continuum. To observe the effect of this photon, we artificially cut the negative energy at a specific value. Accordingly, in the energy distribution of the created pairs, the peak corresponding to three-photon transition disappears, which indicates that the photon inside the negative energy continuum is indispensable in a three-photon transition process. For a narrow field width where the conservation of the momentum breaks down, the production corresponding to the asymmetric transition becomes obvious. In the energy distribution, the peaks representing two-photon transition and three-photon transition become wide and are split into two small peaks. For the three-photon transition, if we cut the negative energy at a specific value, it affects only the peak with lower energy, which indicates a different transition mode of the case corresponding to a wide field. Furthermore, in a narrow field the transition probability of double-photon transition greatly increases, even to a similar order of magnitude of the single photon transition. Apart from transitions with energy equal to integer multiple of the frequency of the photon appearing with asymmetric patterns, there also exists transitions with other energy. The multi-photon transition process of the particles for a narrow field width is more complicated than for a wide field width.[1] Schwinger J 1951 Phys. Rev. 82 664Google Scholar
[2] Cowan T, Backe H, Bethge K, et al. 1986 Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 444Google Scholar
[3] Ahmad I, Austin S M, Back B B, et al. 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 618Google Scholar
[4] Burke D L, Field R C, Horton-Smith G, et al. 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 1626Google Scholar
[5] Bamber C, Boege S J, Koffas T, et al. 1999 Phys. Rev. D 60 092004Google Scholar
[6] Narozhny N B, Bulanov S S, Mur V D, Popov V S 2004 JETP Lett. 80 382Google Scholar
[7] Di Piazza A 2004 Phys. Rev. D 70 053013Google Scholar
[8] Müller C, Hatsagortsyan K Z, Keitel C H 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 033408Google Scholar
[9] Ruf M, Mocken G R, Müller C, Hatsagortsyan K Z, Keitel C H 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 080402Google Scholar
[10] Kirk J G, Bell A R, Arka I 2009 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 51 085008Google Scholar
[11] Tang S, Xie B S, Lu D, Wang H Y, Fu L B, Liu J 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 012106Google Scholar
[12] Liu Y, Lv Q Z, Li Y T, Grobe R, Su Q 2015 Phys. Rev. A 91 052123Google Scholar
[13] Piccinelli G, Sánchez 2017 Phys. Rev. D 96 076014Google Scholar
[14] Li Z L, Xie B S, Li Y J 2019 Phys. Rev. D 100 076018Google Scholar
[15] Krekora P, Su Q, Grobe R 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 040406Google Scholar
[16] Jiang M, Su W, Lu X, Sheng Z M, Li Y T, Li Y J, Zhang J, Grobe R, Su Q 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 053402Google Scholar
[17] Wöllert A, Klaiber M, Bauke H, Keitel C H 2015 Phys. Rev. D 91 065022Google Scholar
[18] Schützhold R, Gies H, Dunne G 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 130404Google Scholar
[19] Monin A, Voloshin M B 2010 Phys. Rev. D 81 085014Google Scholar
[20] Jiang M, Su W, Lv Z Q, et al. 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 033408Google Scholar
[21] Dong S, Unger J, Bryan J, Su Q, Grobe R 2020 Phys. Rev. E 101 013310Google Scholar
[22] Krekora P, Cooley K, Su Q, Grobe R 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 070403Google Scholar
[23] Jiang M, Lv Q Z, Sheng Z M, Grobe R, Su Q 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 042503Google Scholar
[24] Lv Q Z, Liu Y, Li Y J, Grobe R, Su Q 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 013405Google Scholar
[25] Wang Q, Liu J, Fu L B 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 25292Google Scholar
[26] Su D D, Li Y T, Lv Q Z, Zhang J 2020 Phys. Rev. D 101 054501Google Scholar
[27] Braun J W, Su Q, Grobe R 1999 Phys. Rev. A 59 604Google Scholar
[28] Wagner R E, Ware M R, Shields B T, Su Q, Grobe R 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 023601Google Scholar
[29] Bandrauk A D, Shen H 1994 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 27 7147Google Scholar
[30] Mocken G R, Keitel C H 2008 Comput. Phys. Commun. 178 868Google Scholar
[31] Sauter F 1932 Zeitschrift für Physik 73 547Google Scholar
-
图 6 多光子跃迁过程概率在正负能量上的分布图 (a)场宽
$W= $ $ 5/c$ ; (b)场宽$W=1/c$ . 其中外场频率为$\omega=2.5 c^2 $ , 强度为$V_1=8.5 c^2$ Fig. 6. Probability of transition between the positive and negative energy: (a) Field width
$W=5/c$ ; (b) field width$W=1/c$ . The frequency and intensity of the field are$\omega=2.5 c^2$ and$V_1=8.5 c^2$ . -
[1] Schwinger J 1951 Phys. Rev. 82 664Google Scholar
[2] Cowan T, Backe H, Bethge K, et al. 1986 Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 444Google Scholar
[3] Ahmad I, Austin S M, Back B B, et al. 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 618Google Scholar
[4] Burke D L, Field R C, Horton-Smith G, et al. 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 1626Google Scholar
[5] Bamber C, Boege S J, Koffas T, et al. 1999 Phys. Rev. D 60 092004Google Scholar
[6] Narozhny N B, Bulanov S S, Mur V D, Popov V S 2004 JETP Lett. 80 382Google Scholar
[7] Di Piazza A 2004 Phys. Rev. D 70 053013Google Scholar
[8] Müller C, Hatsagortsyan K Z, Keitel C H 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 033408Google Scholar
[9] Ruf M, Mocken G R, Müller C, Hatsagortsyan K Z, Keitel C H 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 080402Google Scholar
[10] Kirk J G, Bell A R, Arka I 2009 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 51 085008Google Scholar
[11] Tang S, Xie B S, Lu D, Wang H Y, Fu L B, Liu J 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 012106Google Scholar
[12] Liu Y, Lv Q Z, Li Y T, Grobe R, Su Q 2015 Phys. Rev. A 91 052123Google Scholar
[13] Piccinelli G, Sánchez 2017 Phys. Rev. D 96 076014Google Scholar
[14] Li Z L, Xie B S, Li Y J 2019 Phys. Rev. D 100 076018Google Scholar
[15] Krekora P, Su Q, Grobe R 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 040406Google Scholar
[16] Jiang M, Su W, Lu X, Sheng Z M, Li Y T, Li Y J, Zhang J, Grobe R, Su Q 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 053402Google Scholar
[17] Wöllert A, Klaiber M, Bauke H, Keitel C H 2015 Phys. Rev. D 91 065022Google Scholar
[18] Schützhold R, Gies H, Dunne G 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 130404Google Scholar
[19] Monin A, Voloshin M B 2010 Phys. Rev. D 81 085014Google Scholar
[20] Jiang M, Su W, Lv Z Q, et al. 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 033408Google Scholar
[21] Dong S, Unger J, Bryan J, Su Q, Grobe R 2020 Phys. Rev. E 101 013310Google Scholar
[22] Krekora P, Cooley K, Su Q, Grobe R 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 070403Google Scholar
[23] Jiang M, Lv Q Z, Sheng Z M, Grobe R, Su Q 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 042503Google Scholar
[24] Lv Q Z, Liu Y, Li Y J, Grobe R, Su Q 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 013405Google Scholar
[25] Wang Q, Liu J, Fu L B 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 25292Google Scholar
[26] Su D D, Li Y T, Lv Q Z, Zhang J 2020 Phys. Rev. D 101 054501Google Scholar
[27] Braun J W, Su Q, Grobe R 1999 Phys. Rev. A 59 604Google Scholar
[28] Wagner R E, Ware M R, Shields B T, Su Q, Grobe R 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 023601Google Scholar
[29] Bandrauk A D, Shen H 1994 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 27 7147Google Scholar
[30] Mocken G R, Keitel C H 2008 Comput. Phys. Commun. 178 868Google Scholar
[31] Sauter F 1932 Zeitschrift für Physik 73 547Google Scholar
计量
- 文章访问数: 3778
- PDF下载量: 60
- 被引次数: 0