基于动力学量子几何张量的多能级系统布居转移的优化控制

李冠强; 张育琦; 郭浩; 董又娇; 蔺治宇; 彭娉

doi:10.7498/aps.74.20250210

摘要

本文从量子几何的角度研究多能级系统布居转移的优化控制. 首先, 建立基于动力学量子几何张量对受激拉曼绝热通道(STIRAP)方案进行优化设计的一般理论框架. 然后, 以具有单光子失谐的$ {{\Lambda }} $型三能级系统和三脚架型四能级系统为例, 分别计算了体系的动力学量子几何张量和非绝热跃迁率, 研究系统的布居转移动力学. 此外, 还讨论了拉比脉冲工作时间、幅度涨落以及单光子失谐等参数对转移过程的影响, 揭示了系统的绝热共振转移现象. 研究发现, 利用动力学量子几何张量优化的STIRAP方案比传统的STIRAP方案具有更快更高效的布居转移.

关键词:

Abstract

The optimal control of population transfer for multi-level systems is investigated from the perspective of quantum geometry. Firstly, the general theoretical framework of optimizing the STIRAP scheme based on the dynamical quantum geometric tensor is given, and then the dynamical quantum geometric tensor and the nonadiabatic transition rate are calculated by taking the detuned $ {{\Lambda }} $-type three-level system and tripod-type four-level system for example. Secondly, the transfer dynamics of the particle population of the system are investigated in detail. For a three-level system, the optimal STIRAP scheme has an efficiency of over 98% in transferring the population to the state $ \left|3\right.\rangle $, while the transfer efficiency of traditional STIRAP is about 72%. The superposition states with arbitrary proportions can be efficiently prepared for a four-level system due to the decoupling of the degenerate dark states. Finally, the influences of system parameters, such as the operating time of the Rabi pulses, the amplitude fluctuation and the single-photon detuning, on the transfer process are discussed. Especially, the phenomena of the adiabatic resonance transfer are revealed. Choosing the pulse parameters in the resonance window can reduce the infidelity of the population transfer to below 10^–3. It is found that the optimal STIRAP scheme by the dynamical quantum geometric tensor provides faster and more efficient transfer than the traditional STIRAP scheme.

Keywords:

stimulated Raman adiabatic passage /
dynamical quantum geometric tensor /
adiabatic population transfer /
$ {{\Lambda }} $-type three-level system /
tripod-type four-level system /
dark states

作者及机构信息

陕西科技大学物理与信息科学学院, 西安　710021

通信作者: 李冠强, liguanqiang@sust.edu.cn

Authors and contacts

School of Physics and Information Science, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710021, China

Corresponding author: LI Guanqiang, liguanqiang@sust.edu.cn

文章全文

参考文献

[1]	Born M, Fock V 1928 Zeitschrift für Physik 51 165 Google Scholar
[2]	Wu Z, Yang H 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 012114 Google Scholar
[3]	Holonomy S B 1983 Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 2167 Google Scholar
[4]	Xiao D, Chang M C, Niu Q 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 1959 Google Scholar
[5]	Vitanov N V, Rangelov A A, Shore B W, Bergmann K 2017 Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 015006 Google Scholar
[6]	Shore B W, Bergmann K, Oreg J, Rosenwaks S 1991 Phys. Rev. A 44 7442 Google Scholar
[7]	Shore B W 2013 Acta Phys. Slovaca 63 361 Google Scholar
[8]	孙晓鹏, 冯志芳, 李卫东, 贾锁堂 2007 物理学报 56 5727 Google Scholar Sun X P, Feng Z F, Li W D, Jia S T 2007 Acta Phys. Sin. 56 5727 Google Scholar
[9]	孟少英, 吴炜, 刘彬 2009 物理学报 58 6902 Google Scholar Meng S Y, Wu W, Liu B 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 6902 Google Scholar
[10]	李冠强, 彭娉 2011 物理学报 60 110304 Google Scholar Li G Q, Peng P 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 110304 Google Scholar
[11]	李冠强, 彭娉, 曹振洲, 薛具奎 2012 物理学报 61 090301 Google Scholar Li G Q, Peng P, Cao Z Z, Xue J K 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 090301 Google Scholar
[12]	Bergmann K, Vitanov N V, Shore B W 2015 J. Chem. Phys. 142 170901 Google Scholar
[13]	Fewell M P, Shore B W, Bergmann K 1997 Austra. J. Phys 50 281 Google Scholar
[14]	Guéry-Odelin D, Ruschhaupt A, Kiely A, Torrontegui E, Martínez-Garaot S, Muga J G 2019 Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 045001 Google Scholar
[15]	Hatomura T 2024 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 57 102001 Google Scholar
[16]	Chen X, Lizuain I, Ruschhaupt A, Guéry-Odelin D, Muga J G 2010 Phys. Rev. Letts. 105 123003 Google Scholar
[17]	Minář Jí, Söyler Ş G, Rotondo P, Lesanovsky I 2017 New J. Phys. 19 063033 Google Scholar
[18]	Ban Y, Chen X, Sherman E Y, Muga J G 2012 Phys. Rev. Letts. 109 206602 Google Scholar
[19]	Opatrný T, Saberi H, Brion E, Mølmer K 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 023815 Google Scholar
[20]	Tian L 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 153604 Google Scholar
[21]	Barrett S, Hammerer K, Harrison S, Northup T E, Osborne T J 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 090501 Google Scholar
[22]	Yu X M, Zhou K, Zhang H Y, Li S X, Huang Z, Wen J, Zhang R, Yu Y 2025 Phys. Rev. A 111 012623 Google Scholar
[23]	Masuda S 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 063624 Google Scholar
[24]	Masuda S, Güngördü U, Chen X, Ohmi T, Nakahara M 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 013626 Google Scholar
[25]	Demirplak M, Rice S A 2003 J. Phys. Chem. A 107 9937 Google Scholar
[26]	Berry M V 2009 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 365303 Google Scholar
[27]	Lewis H R, Riesenfeld W B 1969 J. Math. Phys. 10 1458 Google Scholar
[28]	Chen X, Torrontegui E, Muga J G 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 062116 Google Scholar
[29]	Masuda S, Rice S A 2015 J. Phys. Chem. A 119 3479 Google Scholar
[30]	Masuda S, Nakamura K 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 062108 Google Scholar
[31]	Torosov B T, Della Valle G, Longhi S 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 063412 Google Scholar
[32]	Torosov B T, Della Valle G, Longhi S 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 052502 Google Scholar
[33]	Li G Q, Chen G D, Peng P, Qi W 2017 Euro. Phys. J. D 71 14 Google Scholar
[34]	Li K Z, Tian J Z, Xiao L T 2024 Phys. Rev. A 109 022443 Google Scholar
[35]	Chen J F 2022 Phys. Rev. Res. 4 023252 Google Scholar
[36]	Sun C P 1988 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 21 1595 Google Scholar
[37]	Rigolin G, Ortiz G, Ponce V H 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 052508 Google Scholar
[38]	Chen J F, Sun C P, Dong H 2019 Phys. Rev. E 100 062140 Google Scholar
[39]	Oh S, Shim Y P, Fei J, et al. 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 022332 Google Scholar
[40]	Gaubatz U, Rudecki P, Schiemann S, Bergmann K 1990 J. Chem. Phys. 92 5363 Google Scholar
[41]	Unanyan R G, Shore B W, Bergmann K 2001 Phys. Rev. A 63 043401 Google Scholar
[42]	Vitanov N V 1998 Phys. Rev. A 58 2295 Google Scholar
[43]	Vitanov N V, Halfmann T, Shore B W, Bergmann K 2001 Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 52 763 Google Scholar
[44]	Unanyan R, Fleischhauer M, Shore B W, Bergmann K 1998 Opt. Commun. 155 144 Google Scholar
[45]	Madasu C S, Rathod K D, Kwong C C, Wilkowski D 2024 Phys. Rev. Appl. 21 L051001 Google Scholar
[46]	Shi Z C, Wang J H, Zhang C, Song J, Xia Y 2024 Phys. Rev. A 109 022441 Google Scholar
[47]	Jin Z Y, Jing J 2025 Phys. Rev. A 111 022628 Google Scholar
[48]	Li G Q, Guo H, Zhang Y Q, Yang B, Peng P 2025 Commun. Theor. Phys. 77 015103 Google Scholar

施引文献

图 1 具有单光子失谐的三能级系统STIRAP方案的示意图

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the STIRAP scheme for a three-level system with single photon detuning

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 三能级系统拉比脉冲结构与粒子数布居的演化结果　(a)优化STIRAP脉冲结构; (b)优化STIRAP粒子数布居的演化结果; (c)传统STIRAP脉冲结构; (d)传统STIRAP粒子数布居的演化结果. 脉冲工作时间$ \tau =4{\mathrm{ }}\;{\text{μ}}{\mathrm{s}} $, 脉冲峰值$ {\varOmega }_{0}=30.79\;{\mathrm{ }}{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $, 失谐量$ \varDelta =2{\mathrm{\pi }}\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $

Fig. 2. Rabi pulse’s structures and the evolution results of the populations for the three-level system: (a) Pulse structures for the optimal STIRAP; (b) evolution of the populations for the optimal STIRAP; (c) pulse structures for the standard STIRAP; (d) evolution of the populations for the standard STIRAP. The pulse operating time $ \tau =4\;{\mathrm{ }}{\text{μ}}{\mathrm{s}} $, the pulse peak $ {\varOmega }_{0}=30.79{\mathrm{ }}\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $, and the detuning $ \varDelta =2{\mathrm{\pi }}\;{\mathrm{ }}{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 混合角随时间的变化. 红色实线表示优化STIRAP的混合角, 蓝色虚线表示传统STIRAP的混合角

Fig. 3. Change of the mixing angle with time. The red solid line indicates the mixing angle for the optimal STIRAP and the blue dashed line indicates the mixing angle for the standard STIRAP.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 三能级系统失真度随工作时间的变化　(a)不存在失谐的情况($ \varDelta =0 $); (b)存在失谐的情况($ \varDelta =2{\mathrm{\pi }}\;{\mathrm{ }}{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}}) $. 红色实线表示优化STIRAP, 蓝色虚线表示传统STIRAP; 脉冲峰值$ {\varOmega }_{0}=35{\mathrm{ }}\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $

Fig. 4. Change of the infidelity with time for the three-level system: (a) The case without detuning ($ \varDelta =0) $; (b) the case with detuning ($ \varDelta =2{\mathrm{\pi }}{\mathrm{ }}\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $). The red solid line corresponds to the optimal STIRAP scheme and the blue dashed line corresponds to the standard STIRAP one. The pulse peak $ {\varOmega }_{0}=35\;{\mathrm{ }}{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 三能级系统失真度随脉冲峰值涨落的变化　(a)不存在失谐的情况($ \varDelta =0 $); (b)存在失谐的情况($ \varDelta =2{\mathrm{\pi }}\;{\mathrm{ }}{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $). 红色实线表示优化STIRAP, 蓝色虚线表示传统STIRAP; 脉冲峰值$ {\varOmega }_{0}=35{\mathrm{ }}\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $, 工作时间τ = 7.4 μs

Fig. 5. Change of the infidelity with the fluctuation of the pulse peak for the three-level system: (a) The case without detuning ($ \varDelta =0 $); (b) the case with detuning ($ \varDelta = $$ 2{\mathrm{\pi }}\;{\mathrm{ }}{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $). The red solid line denotes the optimal STIRAP scheme and the blue dashed line denotes the standard STIRAP one. The pulse peak $ {\varOmega }_{0}=35{\mathrm{ }}\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $ and the operating time τ = 7.4 μs.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 三能级系统失真度随单光子失谐量的变化. 红色实线表示优化STIRAP, 蓝色虚线表示传统STIRAP; 脉冲峰值$ {\varOmega }_{0}=35{\mathrm{ }}\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $, 脉冲工作时间τ = 7.4 μs

Fig. 6. Change of the infidelity with single-photon detuning for the three-level system. The red solid line denotes the optimal STIRAP scheme and the blue dashed line denotes the standard STIRAP one. The pulse peak $ {\varOmega }_{0}=35\;{\mathrm{ }}{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $ and the pulse operating time τ = 7.4 μs.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 具有单光子失谐的四能级系统STIRAP方案的示意图

Fig. 7. Schematic diagram of the STIRAP scheme for a four-level system with single photon detuning.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 四能级系统拉比脉冲结构与粒子布居数的演化结果　(a)优化STIRAP脉冲结构; (b)优化STIRAP粒子布居数的演化结果; (c)传统STIRAP脉冲结构; (d)传统STIRAP粒子布居数的演化结果. 工作时间$ \tau =4{\mathrm{ }}\;{\text{μ}}{\mathrm{s}} $, 脉冲峰值$ {\varOmega }_{0}=35\;{\mathrm{ }}{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $, 失谐量$ \varDelta =2{\mathrm{\pi }}\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $

Fig. 8. Rabi pulse’s structures and the evolution results of the populations for the four-level system: (a) Pulse structures for the optimal STIRAP; (b) evolution of the populations for the optimal STIRAP; (c) pulse structures for the standard STIRAP; (d) evolution of the populations for the standard STIRAP. The pulse operating time $ \tau =4{\mathrm{ }}\;{\text{μ}}{\mathrm{s}} $, the pulse peak $ {\varOmega }_{0}=35\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $, and the detuning $ \varDelta =2{\mathrm{\pi }}\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 四能级系统失真度随工作时间的变化情况　(a)不存在失谐的情况($ \varDelta =0 $); (b)存在失谐的情况($ \varDelta =2{\mathrm{\pi }}\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $). 红色实线表示优化STIRAP, 蓝色虚线表示传统STIRAP; 脉冲峰值$ {\varOmega }_{0}=35\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $

Fig. 9. Change of the infidelity with time for the four-level system: (a) The case without detuning ($ \varDelta =0) $; (b) the case with detuning ($ \varDelta =2{\mathrm{\pi }}\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $). The red solid line corresponds to the optimal STIRAP scheme and the blue dashed line corresponds to the standard STIRAP one. The pulse peak $ {\varOmega }_{0}=35\;{\mathrm{ }}{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 四能级系统失真度随脉冲峰值涨落的变化　(a)不存在失谐的情况($ \varDelta =0 $); (b)存在失谐的情况($ \varDelta =2{\mathrm{\pi }}\;{\mathrm{ }}{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $). 红色实线表示优化STIRAP, 蓝色虚线表示传统STIRAP; 脉冲峰值$ {\varOmega }_{0}=35{\mathrm{ }}\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $, 脉冲工作时间τ = 7.4 μs

Fig. 10. Change of the infidelity with the fluctuation of the pulse peak for the four-level system: (a) The case without detuning ($ \varDelta =0 $); (b) the case with detuning ($ \varDelta = $$ 2{\mathrm{\pi }}\;{\mathrm{ }}{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $). The red solid line denotes the optimal STIRAP scheme and the blue dashed line denotes the standard STIRAP one. The pulse peak $ {\varOmega }_{0}=35{\mathrm{ }}\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $ and the operating time τ = 7.4 μs

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 四能级系统失真度随失谐量$ {\mathrm{\varDelta }} $的变化 (红色实线为最优STIRAP, 蓝色虚线为传统STIRAP; 脉冲峰值$ {\varOmega }_{0}= $$ 35\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $, 脉冲工作时间τ = 7.4 μs)

Fig. 11. Change of the infidelity with single-photon detuning for the four-level system. The red solid line denotes the optimal STIRAP scheme and the blue dashed line denotes the standard STIRAP one. The pulse peak $ {\varOmega }_{0}=35\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $ and the pulse operating time τ = 7.4 μs.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 大失谐($ \varDelta > {\varOmega }_{0} $)情况下四能级系统布居数演化结果　(a)优化STIRAP演化结果; (b)传统STIRAP演化结果. 蓝色虚线为$ \left|1\right.\rangle $态量子数布居, 绿色点线为$ \left|2\right.\rangle $态量子数布居, 红色虚线为$ \left|3\right.\rangle $态量子数布居, 黑色实线为$ |4\rangle $态量子数布居; 工作时间τ = 7.4 μs, 脉冲峰值$ {\varOmega }_{0}= $$ 22.13\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $, 失谐量$ \varDelta =58.1\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $

Fig. 12. Population’s evolution of the four-level system for the large detuning ($ \varDelta > {\varOmega }_{0} $): (a) The result for the optimal STIRAP scheme; (b) the result for the standard STIRAP scheme. The blue dashed line, the green dotted line, the red dashed line and the black solid line correspond to the populations in the states $ \left|1\right.\rangle $, $ \left|2\right.\rangle $, $ \left|3\right.\rangle $ and $ \left|4\right.\rangle $, respectively. The pulse operating time $ \tau =7.4{\mathrm{ }}\;{\text{μ}}{\mathrm{s}} $, the pulse peak $ {\varOmega }_{0}=22.13\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $, and the detuning $ \varDelta = $$ 58.1\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 脉演化结果随脉冲参数$ \chi $变化情况. 蓝色虚线为$ \left|1\right.\rangle $态粒子数布居, 绿色点线为$ \left|2\right.\rangle $态粒子数布居, 红色虚线为$ \left|3\right.\rangle $态粒子数布居, 黑色实线为$ \left|4\right.\rangle $态粒子数布居; 工作时间τ = 7.4 μs, 脉冲峰值$ {\varOmega }_{0}=35\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $, 失谐量$ \varDelta =2 {\mathrm{\pi }}{\mathrm{ }}\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $

Fig. 13. Change of the populations for the four-level system with the parameter $ \chi $. The blue dashed line, the green dotted line, the red dashed line and the black solid line correspond to the populations in the states $ \left|1\right.\rangle $, $ \left|2\right.\rangle $, $ \left|3\right.\rangle $ and $ \left|4\right.\rangle $, respectively. The pulse operating time $ \tau =7.4\;{\mathrm{ }}{\text{μ}}{\mathrm{s}} $, the pulse peak $ {\varOmega }_{0}=35\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $, and the detuning $ \varDelta =2{\mathrm{\pi }}{\mathrm{ }}\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 布居数演化结果　(a)脉冲参数$ \eta $= $ {\mathrm{\pi }}/4 $; (b)脉冲参数$ \eta $= $ {\mathrm{\pi }}/6 $. 蓝色虚线为$ \left|1\right.\rangle $态粒子数布居, 绿色点线为$ \left|2\right.\rangle $态粒子数布居, 红色虚线为$ \left|3\right.\rangle $态粒子数布居, 黑色实线为$ \left|4\right.\rangle $态粒子数布居; 工作时间τ = 7.4 $ {\text{μ}}{\mathrm{s}} $, 脉冲峰值$ {\varOmega }_{0}= $$ 35{\mathrm{ }}\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $, 失谐量$ \varDelta =2{\mathrm{\pi }}\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $

Fig. 14. Evolution results of the populations: (a) Pulse parameter $ \eta $= $ {\mathrm{\pi }}/4 $; (b) pulse parameter $ \eta $= $ {\mathrm{\pi }}/6 $. The blue dashed line, the green dotted line, the red dashed line and the black solid line correspond to the populations in the states $ \left|1\right.\rangle $, $ \left|2\right.\rangle $, $ \left|3\right.\rangle $ and $ \left|4\right.\rangle $, respectively. The pulse operating time $ \tau =7.4\;{\mathrm{ }}{\text{μ}}{\mathrm{s}} $, the pulse peak $ {\varOmega }_{0}=35{\mathrm{ }}\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $, and the detuning $ \varDelta =2{\mathrm{\pi }}\;{\mathrm{M}}{\mathrm{H}}{\mathrm{z}} $.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

[1]	Born M, Fock V 1928 Zeitschrift für Physik 51 165 Google Scholar
[2]	Wu Z, Yang H 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 012114 Google Scholar
[3]	Holonomy S B 1983 Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 2167 Google Scholar
[4]	Xiao D, Chang M C, Niu Q 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 1959 Google Scholar
[5]	Vitanov N V, Rangelov A A, Shore B W, Bergmann K 2017 Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 015006 Google Scholar
[6]	Shore B W, Bergmann K, Oreg J, Rosenwaks S 1991 Phys. Rev. A 44 7442 Google Scholar
[7]	Shore B W 2013 Acta Phys. Slovaca 63 361 Google Scholar
[8]	孙晓鹏, 冯志芳, 李卫东, 贾锁堂 2007 物理学报 56 5727 Google Scholar Sun X P, Feng Z F, Li W D, Jia S T 2007 Acta Phys. Sin. 56 5727 Google Scholar
[9]	孟少英, 吴炜, 刘彬 2009 物理学报 58 6902 Google Scholar Meng S Y, Wu W, Liu B 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 6902 Google Scholar
[10]	李冠强, 彭娉 2011 物理学报 60 110304 Google Scholar Li G Q, Peng P 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 110304 Google Scholar
[11]	李冠强, 彭娉, 曹振洲, 薛具奎 2012 物理学报 61 090301 Google Scholar Li G Q, Peng P, Cao Z Z, Xue J K 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 090301 Google Scholar
[12]	Bergmann K, Vitanov N V, Shore B W 2015 J. Chem. Phys. 142 170901 Google Scholar
[13]	Fewell M P, Shore B W, Bergmann K 1997 Austra. J. Phys 50 281 Google Scholar
[14]	Guéry-Odelin D, Ruschhaupt A, Kiely A, Torrontegui E, Martínez-Garaot S, Muga J G 2019 Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 045001 Google Scholar
[15]	Hatomura T 2024 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 57 102001 Google Scholar
[16]	Chen X, Lizuain I, Ruschhaupt A, Guéry-Odelin D, Muga J G 2010 Phys. Rev. Letts. 105 123003 Google Scholar
[17]	Minář Jí, Söyler Ş G, Rotondo P, Lesanovsky I 2017 New J. Phys. 19 063033 Google Scholar
[18]	Ban Y, Chen X, Sherman E Y, Muga J G 2012 Phys. Rev. Letts. 109 206602 Google Scholar
[19]	Opatrný T, Saberi H, Brion E, Mølmer K 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 023815 Google Scholar
[20]	Tian L 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 153604 Google Scholar
[21]	Barrett S, Hammerer K, Harrison S, Northup T E, Osborne T J 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 090501 Google Scholar
[22]	Yu X M, Zhou K, Zhang H Y, Li S X, Huang Z, Wen J, Zhang R, Yu Y 2025 Phys. Rev. A 111 012623 Google Scholar
[23]	Masuda S 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 063624 Google Scholar
[24]	Masuda S, Güngördü U, Chen X, Ohmi T, Nakahara M 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 013626 Google Scholar
[25]	Demirplak M, Rice S A 2003 J. Phys. Chem. A 107 9937 Google Scholar
[26]	Berry M V 2009 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 365303 Google Scholar
[27]	Lewis H R, Riesenfeld W B 1969 J. Math. Phys. 10 1458 Google Scholar
[28]	Chen X, Torrontegui E, Muga J G 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 062116 Google Scholar
[29]	Masuda S, Rice S A 2015 J. Phys. Chem. A 119 3479 Google Scholar
[30]	Masuda S, Nakamura K 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 062108 Google Scholar
[31]	Torosov B T, Della Valle G, Longhi S 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 063412 Google Scholar
[32]	Torosov B T, Della Valle G, Longhi S 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 052502 Google Scholar
[33]	Li G Q, Chen G D, Peng P, Qi W 2017 Euro. Phys. J. D 71 14 Google Scholar
[34]	Li K Z, Tian J Z, Xiao L T 2024 Phys. Rev. A 109 022443 Google Scholar
[35]	Chen J F 2022 Phys. Rev. Res. 4 023252 Google Scholar
[36]	Sun C P 1988 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 21 1595 Google Scholar
[37]	Rigolin G, Ortiz G, Ponce V H 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 052508 Google Scholar
[38]	Chen J F, Sun C P, Dong H 2019 Phys. Rev. E 100 062140 Google Scholar
[39]	Oh S, Shim Y P, Fei J, et al. 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 022332 Google Scholar
[40]	Gaubatz U, Rudecki P, Schiemann S, Bergmann K 1990 J. Chem. Phys. 92 5363 Google Scholar
[41]	Unanyan R G, Shore B W, Bergmann K 2001 Phys. Rev. A 63 043401 Google Scholar
[42]	Vitanov N V 1998 Phys. Rev. A 58 2295 Google Scholar
[43]	Vitanov N V, Halfmann T, Shore B W, Bergmann K 2001 Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 52 763 Google Scholar
[44]	Unanyan R, Fleischhauer M, Shore B W, Bergmann K 1998 Opt. Commun. 155 144 Google Scholar
[45]	Madasu C S, Rathod K D, Kwong C C, Wilkowski D 2024 Phys. Rev. Appl. 21 L051001 Google Scholar
[46]	Shi Z C, Wang J H, Zhang C, Song J, Xia Y 2024 Phys. Rev. A 109 022441 Google Scholar
[47]	Jin Z Y, Jing J 2025 Phys. Rev. A 111 022628 Google Scholar
[48]	Li G Q, Guo H, Zhang Y Q, Yang B, Peng P 2025 Commun. Theor. Phys. 77 015103 Google Scholar

[1]	豆雨欣, 李伟. 基于SU(3)李代数在无旋转波近似下三能级系统的非绝热布居数转移. 物理学报, 2025, 74(13): . doi: 10.7498/aps.74.20241504
[2]	秦燕, 栗生长. 基于方波脉冲外场的超冷原子-分子绝热转化. 物理学报, 2018, 67(20): 203701. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180908
[3]	张露, 严璐瑶, 鲍洄含, 柴晓茜, 马丹丹, 吴倩楠, 夏凌晨, 姚丹, 钱静. 实现粒子布居高效转移的两种激光脉冲时序方案的理论研究. 物理学报, 2017, 66(21): 213301. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.213301
[4]	饶黄云, 刘义保, 江燕燕, 郭立平, 王资生. 三能级混合态的量子几何相位. 物理学报, 2012, 61(2): 020302. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.020302
[5]	李冠强, 彭娉, 曹振洲, 薛具奎. 超冷原子向异核四聚物分子A3B的绝热转化. 物理学报, 2012, 61(9): 090301. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.090301
[6]	胡孝平, 郭红. 原子质心运动对型三能级原子动力学行为的影响. 物理学报, 2009, 58(1): 272-277. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.272.1
[7]	孟少英, 吴炜. 原子-二聚物分子转化系统在受激拉曼绝热过程中的绝热保真度. 物理学报, 2009, 58(8): 5311-5317. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.5311
[8]	孟少英, 吴炜, 刘彬. 原子-异核-三聚物分子转化系统暗态的动力学不稳定性. 物理学报, 2009, 58(10): 6902-6907. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.6902
[9]	王冠芳, 刘彬, 傅立斌, 赵鸿. 非线性三能级体系的绝热朗道-齐纳隧穿. 物理学报, 2007, 56(7): 3733-3738. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.3733
[10]	李宏, 张永强, 程杰, 王鹿霞, 刘德胜. 飞秒激光控制的量子分子动力学研究——多维三能级系统. 物理学报, 2007, 56(6): 3589-3595. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.3589
[11]	周青春, 祝世宁. Λ型三能级原子与数态单模光场互作用系统的纠缠特性. 物理学报, 2005, 54(5): 2043-2048. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.2043
[12]	谢　旻, 凌琳, 杨国建. 非简并Λ型三能级原子的速度选择相干布居俘获. 物理学报, 2005, 54(8): 3616-3621. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.3616
[13]	黄善国, 顾畹仪, 马海强. 失谐对冷原子介质中光脉冲信息存储的影响. 物理学报, 2004, 53(12): 4211-4217. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.4211
[14]	龙德顺, 宁西京. 二能级系统的布居囚禁现象. 物理学报, 2001, 50(12): 2335-2340. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.2335
[15]	赖振讲, 刘自信. 附加Kerr介质非关联双模相干态场与V型三能级原子的相互作用系统中原子(场)的熵特性. 物理学报, 2000, 49(9): 1714-1718. doi: 10.7498/aps.49.1714
[16]	韩立波, 田永红, 李高翔, 彭金生. 双模SU(1,1)猫态与级联三能级原子的粒子布居相干俘获. 物理学报, 2000, 49(4): 696-701. doi: 10.7498/aps.49.696
[17]	刘三秋, 郭琴, 陶向阳, 付传鸿. 非旋波近似下级联型三能级原子与腔场相互作用的量子动力学性质. 物理学报, 1998, 47(9): 1481-1488. doi: 10.7498/aps.47.1481
[18]	路洪, 彭金生, 李高翔. 双模SU(1,1)相干态场与V型三能级原子相互作用的动力学. 物理学报, 1995, 44(5): 708-714. doi: 10.7498/aps.44.708
[19]	刘三秋, 刘正东, 李佛铨, 曹昌祺. 两个级联型三能级原子受激辐射的非线性性质. 物理学报, 1993, 42(7): 1049-1057. doi: 10.7498/aps.42.1049
[20]	刘正东. 级联型三能级原子受激辐射中的反聚束效应. 物理学报, 1987, 36(12): 1645-1651. doi: 10.7498/aps.36.1645

计量

文章访问数: 290
PDF下载量: 15
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板

基于动力学量子几何张量的多能级系统布居转移的优化控制