-
TATB是目前安全性能最好的炸药，TATB造型粉颗粒经压制成型的高聚物粘结炸药（ PBX）在军事中具有重要的应用。在应力作用下，TATB造型粉颗粒体系的演化决定了成型药柱的细观结构和整体质量。TATB造型粉颗粒体系在力载作用下的结构演化和力学特性变化难以表征。本研究采用X-μCT层析成像与同步原位力载相结合的方法，通过对CT图像处理与分析，建立了TATB造型粉颗粒体系的三维孔隙网络模型（ PNM），基于该模型获得了接触数量、接触面积、接触强弱、配位数等关键特征参量的演化特性。结果表明，0~5 MPa下，随着应力的增加，TATB造型粉颗粒体系中颗粒接触数量呈下降趋势，减少率为53.3%；总接触面积减少率为31.5%，但强弱接触占比几乎维持不变；颗粒体积平均增加率为45.50%，平均配位数由7.27增加到9.44。该项研究揭示了颗粒在成型过程初期的力学行为演化规律，实现了颗粒体系力载过程的三维、定量、原位分析，对炸药颗粒压制过程的力学特性的认识有重要科学意义和工程意义。TATB is currently the safest explosive in terms of safety performance. Polymer bonded explosive (PBX) formed by pressing TATB particles has important applications in military. Under the action of stress, the evolution of TATB particle system determines the microstructure and overall quality of molding grain. The molding method of PBX is usually realized by molding technology. During the process of molding, the structural evolution and mechanical properties of TATB particle system are very complex under the action of loading, and the high discreteness, strong non-linearity and bonding characteristics are difficult to characterize.
In this study, X-μ CT tomography and synchronous in-situ force loading were used to develop a set of image processing technology for TATB particle system, which was a multi-component, irregular, multi-particle size, heterogeneous, viscoelastic special composite material. High-quality CT images of TATB particles under force loading were obtained. A three-dimensional pore network model (PNM) of TATB particle system was established by CT image processing and analysis. Based on the model, the evolution characteristics of key parameters such as contact number, contact area, contact strength and coordination number were obtained.
The results indicate the following evolutionary characteristics: at 0~5 MPa, with the process of pressing, the stress of TATB particle system increased continuously, and the number of particle contacts in the particle system decreases, with a reduction rate of53.3%; The total contact area decreased by31.5%, but the average contact area of a single particle continued to increase; The strength and weak contact of the entire particle system showed a downward trend, but the proportion of strength and weak remained almost unchanged, reflecting the stable characteristics of the TATB molding particle system in the external stable, linear, and slow loading process, and the average proportion of strong contact was 37.74%; The average increase rate of particle volume was 45.50%, and the curve of equivalent radius was very consistent with the curve of average particle volume; The average coordination number of the entire particle system increased from 7.27 to 9.44, and the highest coordination number range was 6~10. The morphological distribution showed the characteristics of approximately normal distribution, double-peak nearly normal distribution, flat-peak nearly normal distribution. At 5 MPa, some particles showed the characteristics of rotation and adaptive rearrangement, which was consistent with the quantitative analysis of the trend of particle contact number.
This study reveals the movement, deformation and fusion rules of particles in the initial stage of the forming process, achieving the three-dimensional, quantitative and In-situ analysis of the force loading process of the particle system, and has important scientific and engineering significance for the understanding of the mechanical characteristics of the explosive particle pressing process.-
Keywords:
- TATB /
- Three-dimensional particle system /
- CT image processing /
- mechanical behavior
-
[1] Dong H S, Zhou F F 1989 Performance of high-energy explosives and related substances (Beijing: Science Press) p20-32(in Chinese) [董海山， 周芬芬1989高能炸药及相关物性能(北京: 科学出版社)第20-32页]
[2] Fan H, He G S, Yang Z J, Nie F D, Chen P W 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68106201(in Chinese) [范航， 何冠松， 杨志剑， 聂福德， 陈鹏万2019物理学报68106201]
[3] Hamilton B W, Kroonblawd M P, Isiam M M, Strachan A 2019 Journal of Physical Chemistry C 12321969.
[4] Steele B A, Clarke S M, Kroonblawd M P, Kuo I F, Pagoria P F, Tkachev S N, Smith J S, Bastea S, Fried L E, Zaug J M, Stavrou E, Tschauner O 2019 Applied Physics Letters. 114191901
[5] Hertz H 1882 J. Reine Angew. Math. 1882156
[6] Chang C S, Liao C L 1990 Int. J. Solids Structures. 26437
[7] Tordesillas A, Peters J F, Gardiner B S 2004 Int J Numer Anal Met,28981
[8] Andrade J E, Cacute V, Lim K W, Jerves A 2012 Géotechnique Letters, 2135
[9] Coppersmith S N, Liu C H, Majumdar S, Narayan O, Witten T A 1996 Physical Review E, 534673
[10] Silva M D, Rajchenbach J 2000 Nature. 406708
[11] Andrade J E, Avila C F 2012 Granular Matter. 1451
[12] Hurley R, Marteau E, Ravichandran G, Andrade J E 2014 Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 63154
[13] Zhai C P, Herbold E B, Hurley R C 2020 PNAS, 1176234
[14] Chen Q, Wang Q H, Zhao C, Zhang Q, Hou M Y 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64154502(in Chinese) [陈琼，王青花，赵闯，张祺，厚美瑛2015物理学报64154502]
[15] Løvoll G. Måløy K J, Flekkøy E G 1999 Physical Review E, 605872
[16] Miao T D, Yi C H, Qi Y L, Mu Q S, Liu Y 2007 Acta Phys. Sin.564713(in Chinese) [苗天德，宜晨虹，齐艳丽，慕青松，刘源2007物理学报564713]
[17] Yang R W. 2007 Ph. D. Dissertation (Beijing: Tsinghua University) (in Chinese) [杨荣伟2009硕士学位论文(北京:清华大学)]
[18] Zhou J, Long S, Wang Q, Dinsmore A D 2006 Science. 3121631
[19] Sanfratello L, Fukushima E, Behringer R P 2009 Granular Matter. 111
[20] Xing Y, Zheng J, Li J D, Cao Y X, Pan W, Zhang J, Wang Y J 2021 Physical Review Letters. 126048002
[21] Baur M, Claussen J, Gerth S, Kollmer J, Shreve T, Uhlmann N, Pöschel T 2019 Powder Technology. 356439
[22] Nguyen C D, Benahmed N, Andò E, Sibille L, Philippe P 2019 Acta Geotechnica. 14749
[23] Brisard S, Serdar M, Monteiro P J M 2020 Cement and Concrete Research. 128105824
[24] Ramesh S, Thyagaraj T 2022 Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources. 811
[25] Fonseca J, O’Sullivan C, Coop M R, Lee P D 2012 Soils and Foundations 52712
[26] Ma Y X, Liu C, Wang H, Zhang C X, Chen H, Zhang W B 2020 Chin.J. Energ. Mater. 28960(in Chinese) [马寅翔，刘晨，王慧，张才鑫，陈华，张伟斌2020含 能材料28960]
[27] Dai B 2015 M.S. (Beijing: Graduate School of China Academy of Engineering Physics) (in Chinese) [戴斌2015硕士学位论文(北京: 中国工程物理研究院研究生院)]
[28] Koyuncu C F, Durmaz I, Cetin-Atalay R, Gunduz D C 201422nd Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference, Trabzon, April 23-25, 2014 p1971
[29] Mouelhi A, Sayadi M, Fnaiech F, Mrad K 2013 Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. 8421
[30] Li Z T, Liu D M, Cai Y D, Ranjith P G, Yao Y B 2017 Fuel. 20943
[31] Jing H L, Dan H C, Shan H Y, Liu X 2023 Materials. 167426
[32] Harshini D R D G, Gamage R P, Kumari W G P 2024 Gas Science and Engineering. 125205280
[33] Zakirov T R, Galeev A A, Korolev E A, Statsenko E O 2016 Curr. Sci. 1102142
[34] Ren X Z, Linden J V D, Narsilio G 2019 Geoscience. 33345(in Chinese) [任显卓， LINDEN Joost van der, NARSILIO Guillermo 201933345]
[35] Yin S H, Chen X, Liu C, Wang L M, Yan R F 2020 Chinese Journal of Engineering. 42972(in Chinese) [尹升华，陈勋，刘超，王雷鸣，严荣富2020工 程科学学报42972]
计量
- 文章访问数: 13
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
