-
The accurate calibration of the beam energy of the circular electron-positron collider (CEPC) is performed to accurately measure the mass width of Higgs particle and the mass of W/Z boson, thus providing the basic experimental basis for the accurate test of the standard model. Based on this, the error control of beam energy is required to be at a level of 10–5. Compton backscattering method is suitable for high precision calibration of beam energy in the Hundred GeV high energy electron collider. In this work, the CEPC beam energy is predicted to reach a theoretical accuracy of about 3 MeV by using the accurate measurement of the scattered photon energy after microwave electron Compton backscattering. Firstly, TM01 mode microwave transmission in circular waveguide is selected according to the design requirements, and the electromagnetic field distribution and Poynting vector under this condition are solved. According to the photon distribution and transmission in the waveguide, the design idea is proposed to simplify the complexity of calculation, and the parameters conforming to the design requirements are solved by combining the simultaneous equations of the high purity germanium detector sensitivity and the background of synchrotron radiation. Using the optimal set of waveguide inner diameter, microwave wavelength and electron incident angle data, the derivative of the differential scattering cross section with respect to energy and the collision brightness are obtained when the microwave power is 100 W. The scattered photon density of 15 MeV energy is further obtained, and the signal-to-noise ratio is analyzed according to the photon density of synchrotron radiation under this energy. The feasibility of the scheme is demonstrated theoretically and the technical difficulties and problems to be further studied are discussed.
-
Keywords:
- Compton backscattering /
- circular electron-positron collider /
- beam energy calibration /
- microwave
[1] Tanabashi M, Hagiwara K, Hikasa K, et al. 2018 Phys. Rev. D 98 030001
[2] Ahmad ML A, DanieleA, et al. 2015 CEPC-SppC Preliminary Conceptual Design Report (Vol. Volume I: Physics and Detector) I 17
[3] Achasov M N, Zhang JY, Muchnoi N Y 2017 Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc. 287 19
[4] Compton A H 1923 Phys. Rev. 21 483Google Scholar
[5] Verlinde E 1996 European School Of High-Energy Physics, Proceedings 96 1
[6] Milburn R H 1963 Phys. Rev. Lett. 10 75Google Scholar
[7] Arutyunian F R, Tumanian V A 1963 Phys. Lett. 4 176Google Scholar
[8] Sandorfi A M, LeVine M J, Thorn C E, Giordano G, Matone G 1983 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 30 3083Google Scholar
[9] Schoenlein R W, Leemans W P 1996 Science 274 236Google Scholar
[10] Pogorelsky I V 1998 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 411 172Google Scholar
[11] Zhang J Y, Cai X, Mo X H, Fu C D, Tang G Y, Achasov M N, Muchnoi N Y, Nikolaev I B, Harris F A 2019 Nucl. Phys. B 939 391Google Scholar
[12] Xiao-Hu M O 2014 Chin. Phys. C 38 106203Google Scholar
[13] Zhang J Y, Fu C D, Mo X H, Zhang Z L, Li D W, Wang B Y 2011 Chin. Phys. C 35 660Google Scholar
[14] Tang G Y, Chen S H, Chen Y, Duan Z, Ruan M Q, An G P, Huang Y S, Lou X C, Zhang J Y, Lan X F, Zhang C L 2020 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 91 033109Google Scholar
[15] 郭硕鸿 2008 电动力学 (北京: 高等教育出版社)第1−286页
Guo S H 2008 Electrodynamics (Beijing: Higher Education Press) pp1−286(in Chinese)
[16] 赵凯华 1984 大学物理 1 1
Zhao K H 1984 College Physics 1 1
[17] Zhang J Y, Cai X, Mo X H, Guo D Z, Wang J L, Liu B Q, Achasov M N, Krasnov A A, Muchnoi N Y, Pyata E E, Mamoshkina E V, Harris F A 2016 Chin. Phys. C 40 076001Google Scholar
[18] Shuiting X 2018 Research On Compton Scattering between Photon and High Energy Electron (Vol. I) (Wuhan: Wuhan University) pp1−13
[19] Mobilio S, Boscherini F, Meneghini C 2015 Synchrotron Radiation Basics, Methods and Applications (Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag) pp1−799
[20] White S M, Burkhardt H, Puzo P 2010 Université Paris-Sud: CERN CERN-THESIS-2010-139 154
[21] Nickolai Muchnoi N S U a N, IYF 2018 arXiv: 1803.09595 v1 [hep-ph
[22] Suzuki T https://inspirehep.net/literature/111239[2021-7-5]
[23] Si M Y, Huang Y S 2021 Rev. Sci. Instrum.
-
图 2 波导中坡印廷矢量变化情况 (a)各分量沿ρ方向变化情况; (b) 各分量沿z方向变化情况; (c)坡印廷矢量z分量在空间中的变化情况; (d) 坡印廷矢量ρ分量在空间中的变化情况
Figure 2. Poynting vector variation in the waveguide: (a) The variations of each Poynting vector’s components along the ρ axis; (b) the variations of each Poynting vector’s components along the z axis; (c)variations of the z component of Poynting vector in space; (d) variations of the ρ component of Poynting vector in space.
表 1 CEPC同步辐射参数值
Table 1. Parameters of CEPC synchrotron radiation.
参数 符号 值 单位 束流能量 E 120 GeV 束流电流 I 17.4 mA 转弯半径 ρ 10900 m 单位长度功率 P 435 W/m 临界能量 Ec 351.6 keV 弯转角 θ 2.844 mrad 张角 φ 4.258 Μ.25 表 2 单模传输时微波-电子系统各参数值
Table 2. Parameters of microwave-electronic system in single mode transmission.
a/m λ/m vg cosψ/cosθ Tz/m Tt/S 6.35 × 10–3 1.39 × 10–2 5.45 × 10–1c 5.45 × 10–1 1.28 × 10–2 7.80 × 10–11 5.5 × 10–3 1.30 × 10–2 4.46 × 10–1c 4.46 × 10–1 1.46 × 10–2 1.09 × 10–10 4.76 × 10–3 1.18 × 10–2 3.13 × 10–1c 3.13 × 10–1 1.89 × 10–2 2.01 × 10–10 4.17 × 10–3 1.07 × 10–2 1.88 × 10–1c 1.88 × 10–1 2.85 × 10–2 5.05 × 10–10 3.57 × 10–3 9.32 × 10–2 3.54 × 10–1c 3.54 × 10–1 1.32 × 10–2 1.24 × 10–8 3.18 × 10–3 8.27 × 10–2 8.12 × 10–1c 8.12 × 10–1 5.09 × 10–2 2.09 × 10–9 2.78 × 10–3 7.11 × 10–2 2.11 × 10–1c 2.11 × 10–1 1.69 × 10–2 2.67 × 10–10 2.39 × 10–3 5.84 × 10–2 3.51 × 10–1c 3.51 × 10–1 8.32 × 10–3 7.91 × 10–11 2.18 × 10–3 5.16 × 10–3 4.26 × 10–1c 4.26 × 10–1 6.06 × 10–3 4.74 × 10–11 -
[1] Tanabashi M, Hagiwara K, Hikasa K, et al. 2018 Phys. Rev. D 98 030001
[2] Ahmad ML A, DanieleA, et al. 2015 CEPC-SppC Preliminary Conceptual Design Report (Vol. Volume I: Physics and Detector) I 17
[3] Achasov M N, Zhang JY, Muchnoi N Y 2017 Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc. 287 19
[4] Compton A H 1923 Phys. Rev. 21 483Google Scholar
[5] Verlinde E 1996 European School Of High-Energy Physics, Proceedings 96 1
[6] Milburn R H 1963 Phys. Rev. Lett. 10 75Google Scholar
[7] Arutyunian F R, Tumanian V A 1963 Phys. Lett. 4 176Google Scholar
[8] Sandorfi A M, LeVine M J, Thorn C E, Giordano G, Matone G 1983 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 30 3083Google Scholar
[9] Schoenlein R W, Leemans W P 1996 Science 274 236Google Scholar
[10] Pogorelsky I V 1998 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 411 172Google Scholar
[11] Zhang J Y, Cai X, Mo X H, Fu C D, Tang G Y, Achasov M N, Muchnoi N Y, Nikolaev I B, Harris F A 2019 Nucl. Phys. B 939 391Google Scholar
[12] Xiao-Hu M O 2014 Chin. Phys. C 38 106203Google Scholar
[13] Zhang J Y, Fu C D, Mo X H, Zhang Z L, Li D W, Wang B Y 2011 Chin. Phys. C 35 660Google Scholar
[14] Tang G Y, Chen S H, Chen Y, Duan Z, Ruan M Q, An G P, Huang Y S, Lou X C, Zhang J Y, Lan X F, Zhang C L 2020 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 91 033109Google Scholar
[15] 郭硕鸿 2008 电动力学 (北京: 高等教育出版社)第1−286页
Guo S H 2008 Electrodynamics (Beijing: Higher Education Press) pp1−286(in Chinese)
[16] 赵凯华 1984 大学物理 1 1
Zhao K H 1984 College Physics 1 1
[17] Zhang J Y, Cai X, Mo X H, Guo D Z, Wang J L, Liu B Q, Achasov M N, Krasnov A A, Muchnoi N Y, Pyata E E, Mamoshkina E V, Harris F A 2016 Chin. Phys. C 40 076001Google Scholar
[18] Shuiting X 2018 Research On Compton Scattering between Photon and High Energy Electron (Vol. I) (Wuhan: Wuhan University) pp1−13
[19] Mobilio S, Boscherini F, Meneghini C 2015 Synchrotron Radiation Basics, Methods and Applications (Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag) pp1−799
[20] White S M, Burkhardt H, Puzo P 2010 Université Paris-Sud: CERN CERN-THESIS-2010-139 154
[21] Nickolai Muchnoi N S U a N, IYF 2018 arXiv: 1803.09595 v1 [hep-ph
[22] Suzuki T https://inspirehep.net/literature/111239[2021-7-5]
[23] Si M Y, Huang Y S 2021 Rev. Sci. Instrum.
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 5243
- PDF Downloads: 98
- Cited By: 0