-
Silicon carbide (SiC) has been widely used in nuclear technology due to its excellent properties. In the irradiation environment, the energetic incident particles can cause the atoms in the material to deviate from the position of the crystal lattice, thereby producing the vacancies, interstitial atoms, anti-site atoms and other point defects. These defects will change the thermal properties of the material and degrade the service performance of the material. Therefore, in this work the equilibrium molecular dynamics method (Green-Kubo method) is used to study the effect of point defects on the heat transfer properties of cubic SiC (β-SiC or 3C-SiC) with the help of the Tersoff-type potential. The point defects considered include Si interstitial atoms (SiI), Si vacancies (SiV), Si anti-site atoms (SiC), C interstitial atoms (CI), C vacancies (CV) and C anti-site atoms (CSi). It is found that the thermal conductivity (λ) decreases with the increase of the point defect concentration (c). The excessive thermal resistance (ΔR = Rdefect – Rperfect, R = 1/λ, Rdefect is the thermal resistance of the defective material, and Rperfect is the thermal resistivity of the material without defects) has a linear relation with the concentration of point defects in the considered range (0.2%–1.6%), and its slope is the thermal resistivity coefficient. It can be found that the thermal resistivity coefficient of vacancy and interstitial atoms are higher than that of anti-site atoms; the thermal resistivity coefficient of point defects at high temperature is higher than at low temperature; the thermal resistivity coefficient of Si vacancies and Si interstitial atoms are higher than that of C vacancies and C interstitial atoms. These results are helpful in predicting the thermal conductivity of silicon carbide under irradiation and controlling the thermal conductivity of silicon carbide.
-
Keywords:
- silicon carbide /
- thermal conductivity /
- molecular dynamics /
- point defect
[1] Kawamura T, Hori D, Kangawa Y, Kakimoto K, Yoshimura M, Mori Y 2008 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 47 8898
Google Scholar
[2] Čížek J, Kalivodová J, Janeček M, Stráský J, Srba O, Macková A 2021 Metals 11 76
Google Scholar
[3] Katoh Y, Snead L L 2019 J. Nucl. Mater. 526 151849
Google Scholar
[4] 何培, 姚伟志, 吕建明, 张向东 2018 材料工程 46 19
Google Scholar
Pei H, Yao W Z, Lü J M, Zhang X D 2018 J. Mater. Eng. 46 19
Google Scholar
[5] 盖志刚, 罗崇泰, 陈焘, 张平 2010 真空与低温 16 1
Gai Z G, Luo C T, Chen T, Zhang P 2010 Vac. Cryog. 16 1
[6] Starke U, Schardt J, Bernhardt J, Heinz K 1999 Surf. Rev. Lett. 6 1129
Google Scholar
[7] Ohtani N, Takahashi J, Katsuno M, Yashiro H, Kanaya M 1998 Electron. Commun. Jpn. 81 8
Google Scholar
[8] Snead L L, Nozawa T, Katoh Y, Byun T-S, Kondo S, Petti D A 2007 J. Nucl. Mater. 371 329
Google Scholar
[9] Tan L A T R, Hunn J D, Miller J H 2008 J. Nucl. Mater. 372 400
Google Scholar
[10] Katoh Y, Hashimoto N, Kondo S, Snead L L, Kohyama A 2006 J. Nucl. Mater. 351 228
Google Scholar
[11] Devanathan R, Weber W J, de la Rubia D T 1998 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 141 118
Google Scholar
[12] Ran Q, Zhou Y, Zou Y, Wang J, Duan Z, Sun Z, Fu B, Gao S 2021 Nucl. Mater. Energy 27 100957
Google Scholar
[13] Snead L L, Zinkle S J, White D P 2005 J. Nucl. Mater. 340 187
Google Scholar
[14] Shen G, Chen D, Tang K, Qian Y, Zhang S 2003 Chem. Phys. Lett. 375 177
Google Scholar
[15] Schelling P K, Phillpot S R, Keblinski P 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 144306
Google Scholar
[16] Fu B Q, Lai W, Yuan Y, Xu H, Liu W 2012 J. Nucl. Mater. 427 268
Google Scholar
[17] Crocombette J P, Dumazer G, Hoang N Q, Gao F, Weber W J 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 101 023527
Google Scholar
[18] Lyver J W, Blaisten-Barojas E 2011 J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 8 529
Google Scholar
[19] Sellan D P, Landry E S, Turney J E, McGaughey A J H, Amon C H 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 214305
Google Scholar
[20] Kubo R 1957 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 12 570
Google Scholar
[21] Plimpton S 1995 J. Comput. Phys. 117 1
Google Scholar
[22] Tersoff J 1988 Phys. Rev. B 38 9902
Google Scholar
[23] Erhart P, Albe K 2005 Phys. Rev. B 71 035211
Google Scholar
[24] Martyna G J, Tobias D J, Klein M L 1994 J. Chem. Phys. 101 4177
Google Scholar
[25] Parrinello M, Rahman A 1981 J. Appl. Phys. 52 7182
Google Scholar
[26] Tuckerman M E, Alejandre J, López-Rendón R, Jochim A L, Martyna G J 2006 J. Phys. A:Math. Gen. 39 5629
Google Scholar
[27] Taylor R E, Groot, Ferrier J 1993 Thermophysical Properties of CVD SiC (Thermophysical Properties Research Laboratory Report, School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University) TRPL 1336
[28] Li J, Porter L, Yip S 1998 J. Nucl. Mater. 255 139
Google Scholar
[29] Chen X K, Chen K Q 2020 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 32 153002
Google Scholar
[30] Crocombette J P, Proville L 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 191905
Google Scholar
[31] 黄昆 2009 固体物理学 (北京: 北京大学出版社) 第99页
Huang K 2009 Solid State Physics (Beijing: Peking University Press) p99 (in Chinese)
[32] Kim Y A, Kamio S, Tajiri T, Hayashi T, Song S M, Endo M, Terrones M, Dresselhaus M S 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 90 093125
Google Scholar
[33] Callaway J, Baeyer H V 1960 Phys. Rev. 120 1149
Google Scholar
[34] Gurunathan R, Hanus R, Dylla M, Katre A, Snyder G J 2020 Phys. Rev. Appl. 13 034011
Google Scholar
-
图 1 (a)微观热流密度(J )随时间的变化关系; (b)微观热流密度的时间自相关函数(HFACF)随时间的变化关系. 温度为1500 K, 完美超胞的尺寸为6a × 6a × 6a
Figure 1. (a) Relationship of microscopic heat flux (J ) with time; (b) relationship of heat flux autocorrelation function (HFACF) with time. The temperature is 1500 K, the size of the perfect supercell is 6a × 6a × 6a.
图 2 尺寸对热导率的影响
Figure 2. Effect of size on the thermal conductivity.
图 3 含有点缺陷的SiC超胞热导率(λ)与点缺陷浓度(c, 相当于点缺陷与格点的比例)的关系 (a) 600 K; (b) 1500 K
Figure 3. Relationship between the thermal conductivity (λ) of SiC supercells containing point defects and the concentration of point defects (c, equivalent to the ratio of point defects to lattice points): (a) 600 K; (b) 1500 K.
图 4 含有点缺陷的SiC超胞的额外热阻率(ΔR)与点缺陷浓度(c, 相当于点缺陷与格点的比例)的关系 (a) 600 K; (b) 1500 K
Figure 4. Relationship between the excess thermal resistance (ΔR) of SiC supercells containing point defects and the concentration of point defects (c, equivalent to the ratio of point defects to lattice points): (a) 600 K; (b) 1500 K.
图 5 各种点缺陷不同温度下的热阻率系数l (单位为mK/W)
Figure 5. Thermal resistivity coefficient l (in mK/W) of various point defects at different temperatures.
-
[1] Kawamura T, Hori D, Kangawa Y, Kakimoto K, Yoshimura M, Mori Y 2008 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 47 8898
Google Scholar
[2] Čížek J, Kalivodová J, Janeček M, Stráský J, Srba O, Macková A 2021 Metals 11 76
Google Scholar
[3] Katoh Y, Snead L L 2019 J. Nucl. Mater. 526 151849
Google Scholar
[4] 何培, 姚伟志, 吕建明, 张向东 2018 材料工程 46 19
Google Scholar
Pei H, Yao W Z, Lü J M, Zhang X D 2018 J. Mater. Eng. 46 19
Google Scholar
[5] 盖志刚, 罗崇泰, 陈焘, 张平 2010 真空与低温 16 1
Gai Z G, Luo C T, Chen T, Zhang P 2010 Vac. Cryog. 16 1
[6] Starke U, Schardt J, Bernhardt J, Heinz K 1999 Surf. Rev. Lett. 6 1129
Google Scholar
[7] Ohtani N, Takahashi J, Katsuno M, Yashiro H, Kanaya M 1998 Electron. Commun. Jpn. 81 8
Google Scholar
[8] Snead L L, Nozawa T, Katoh Y, Byun T-S, Kondo S, Petti D A 2007 J. Nucl. Mater. 371 329
Google Scholar
[9] Tan L A T R, Hunn J D, Miller J H 2008 J. Nucl. Mater. 372 400
Google Scholar
[10] Katoh Y, Hashimoto N, Kondo S, Snead L L, Kohyama A 2006 J. Nucl. Mater. 351 228
Google Scholar
[11] Devanathan R, Weber W J, de la Rubia D T 1998 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 141 118
Google Scholar
[12] Ran Q, Zhou Y, Zou Y, Wang J, Duan Z, Sun Z, Fu B, Gao S 2021 Nucl. Mater. Energy 27 100957
Google Scholar
[13] Snead L L, Zinkle S J, White D P 2005 J. Nucl. Mater. 340 187
Google Scholar
[14] Shen G, Chen D, Tang K, Qian Y, Zhang S 2003 Chem. Phys. Lett. 375 177
Google Scholar
[15] Schelling P K, Phillpot S R, Keblinski P 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 144306
Google Scholar
[16] Fu B Q, Lai W, Yuan Y, Xu H, Liu W 2012 J. Nucl. Mater. 427 268
Google Scholar
[17] Crocombette J P, Dumazer G, Hoang N Q, Gao F, Weber W J 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 101 023527
Google Scholar
[18] Lyver J W, Blaisten-Barojas E 2011 J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 8 529
Google Scholar
[19] Sellan D P, Landry E S, Turney J E, McGaughey A J H, Amon C H 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 214305
Google Scholar
[20] Kubo R 1957 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 12 570
Google Scholar
[21] Plimpton S 1995 J. Comput. Phys. 117 1
Google Scholar
[22] Tersoff J 1988 Phys. Rev. B 38 9902
Google Scholar
[23] Erhart P, Albe K 2005 Phys. Rev. B 71 035211
Google Scholar
[24] Martyna G J, Tobias D J, Klein M L 1994 J. Chem. Phys. 101 4177
Google Scholar
[25] Parrinello M, Rahman A 1981 J. Appl. Phys. 52 7182
Google Scholar
[26] Tuckerman M E, Alejandre J, López-Rendón R, Jochim A L, Martyna G J 2006 J. Phys. A:Math. Gen. 39 5629
Google Scholar
[27] Taylor R E, Groot, Ferrier J 1993 Thermophysical Properties of CVD SiC (Thermophysical Properties Research Laboratory Report, School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University) TRPL 1336
[28] Li J, Porter L, Yip S 1998 J. Nucl. Mater. 255 139
Google Scholar
[29] Chen X K, Chen K Q 2020 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 32 153002
Google Scholar
[30] Crocombette J P, Proville L 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 191905
Google Scholar
[31] 黄昆 2009 固体物理学 (北京: 北京大学出版社) 第99页
Huang K 2009 Solid State Physics (Beijing: Peking University Press) p99 (in Chinese)
[32] Kim Y A, Kamio S, Tajiri T, Hayashi T, Song S M, Endo M, Terrones M, Dresselhaus M S 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 90 093125
Google Scholar
[33] Callaway J, Baeyer H V 1960 Phys. Rev. 120 1149
Google Scholar
[34] Gurunathan R, Hanus R, Dylla M, Katre A, Snyder G J 2020 Phys. Rev. Appl. 13 034011
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 6989
- PDF Downloads: 167
- Cited By: 0
