Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Single-molecular surface-induced fluorescence attenuation based on thermal reduced graphene oxide

Fan Qin-Kai Yang Chen-Guang Hu Shu-Xin Xu Chun-Hua Li Ming Lu Ying

Citation:

Single-molecular surface-induced fluorescence attenuation based on thermal reduced graphene oxide

Fan Qin-Kai, Yang Chen-Guang, Hu Shu-Xin, Xu Chun-Hua, Li Ming, Lu Ying
PDF
HTML
Get Citation
  • Single-molecular surface-induced fluorescence attenuation (smSIFA) is a precise method of studying the vertical movement of biological macromolecules based on two-dimensional material receptors. This method is not affected by two-dimensional planar motion of membrane or proteins. However, the detection range and accuracy of vertical movement are determined by the properties of two-dimensional materials as receptors. In recent years, surface induced fluorescence attenuation based on graphene oxide and graphene has played an important role in studying biomacromolecules. However, the detection range of graphene and graphene oxide are limited owing to the fixed and limited characteristic quenching distance. Adjusting the detection range requires replacing the medium material, which poses difficulties in selecting and preparing materials. Therefore, it is urgently needed to develop controllable materials for single-molecular SIFA. In this study, the single-molecule SIFA with graphene oxide as the medium acceptor is improved by reducing graphene oxide through thermal reduction. By controlling the reduction temperature, reduced graphene oxides to different reduction degrees are prepared and the characteristic quenching distances are adjusted. The characteristic quenching distance is measured by fluorescent labeled DNA. Single-molecule SIFA based on reduced graphene oxide is used to observe the conformational changes of Holliday junction, and the detection range of reduced graphene oxide is demonstrated.
      Corresponding author: Lu Ying, yinglu@iphy.ac.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2019YFA0709304), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. T2221001, 12090051, 11974411, 91753104, U1930402, 12090050, 12022409, 32000871), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant Nos. XDB37000000, XDB0480000), the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. ZDBS-LY-SLH015), and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. Y2021003).
    [1]

    Lerner E, Barth A, Hendrix J, et al. 2021 Elife 10 e60416Google Scholar

    [2]

    Keller A M, DeVore M S, Stich D G, Vu D M, Causgrove T, Werner J H 2018 Anal. Chem. 90 6109Google Scholar

    [3]

    Ishikawa-Ankerhold H C, Ankerhold R, Drummen G P 2012 Molecules 17 4047Google Scholar

    [4]

    贾棋, 樊秦凯, 侯文清, 杨晨光, 王利邦, 王浩, 徐春华, 李明, 陆颍 2021 物理学报 70 158701Google Scholar

    Jia Q, Fan Q K, Hou W Q, Yang C G, Wang L B, Wang H, Xu C H, Li M, Lu Y 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 158701Google Scholar

    [5]

    Almen M S, Nordstrom K J V, Fredriksson R, Schioth H B 2009 Bmc. Biology. 7 50Google Scholar

    [6]

    White S H, Wimley W C 1999 Annu. Rev. Bioph. Biom. 28 319Google Scholar

    [7]

    马东飞, 侯文清, 徐春华, 赵春雨, 马建兵, 黄星榞, 贾棋, 马璐, 刘聪, 李明, 陆颖 2020 物理学报 69 038701Google Scholar

    Ma D F, Hou W Q, Xu C H, Zhao C Y, Ma J B, Huang X Y, Jia Q, Ma L, Liu C, Li M, Lu Y 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 038701Google Scholar

    [8]

    Ponmalar, II, Cheerla R, Ayappa K G, Basu J K 2019 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116 12839Google Scholar

    [9]

    King C, Raicu V, Hristova K 2017 J. Biol. Chem. 292 5291Google Scholar

    [10]

    King C, Sarabipour S, Byrne P, Leahy D J, Hristova K 2014 Biophys. J. 106 1309Google Scholar

    [11]

    Li Y, Qian Z, Ma L, Hu S, Nong D, Xu C, Ye F, Lu Y, Wei G, Li M 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 12906Google Scholar

    [12]

    Ma L, Li Y, Ma J B, Hu S X, Li M 2018 Biochemistry 57 4735Google Scholar

    [13]

    Jiang X, Yang C G, Qiu J, Ma D F, Xu C, Hu S X, Han W J, Yuan B, Lu Y 2022 Nanoscale 14 17654Google Scholar

    [14]

    Ma L, Hu S X, He X L, Yang N, Chen L C, Yang C G, Ye F F, Wei T T, Li M 2019 Nano. Lett. 19 6937Google Scholar

    [15]

    Kaminska I, Bohlen J, Yaadav R, Schuler P, Raab M, Schroder T, Zahringer J, Zielonka K, Krause S, Tinnefeld P 2021 Adv. Mater. 33 e2101099Google Scholar

    [16]

    Kaminska I, Bohlen J, Rocchetti S, Selbach F, Acuna G P, Tinnefeld P 2019 Nano. Lett. 19 4257Google Scholar

    [17]

    Federspiel F, Froehlicher G, Nasilowski M, Pedetti S, Mahmood A, Doudin B, Park S, Lee J O, Halley D, Dubertret B, Gilliot P, Berciaud S 2015 Nano. Lett. 15 1252Google Scholar

    [18]

    Gaudreau L, Tielrooij K J, Prawiroatmodjo G E D K, Osmond J, de Abajo F J G, Koppens F H L 2013 Nano. Lett. 13 2030Google Scholar

    [19]

    Li W, Wojcik M, Xu K 2019 Nano. Lett. 19 983Google Scholar

    [20]

    Eda G, Fanchini G, Chhowalla M 2008 Nat. Nanotechnol. 3 270Google Scholar

    [21]

    Pei S F, Cheng H M 2012 Carbon 50 3210Google Scholar

    [22]

    Stankovich S, Dikin D A, Piner R D, Kohlhaas K A, Kleinhammes A, Jia Y, Wu Y, Nguyen S T, Ruoff R S 2007 Carbon 45 1558Google Scholar

    [23]

    Sulowska K, Wiwatowski K, Szustakiewicz P, Grzelak J, Lewandowski W, Mackowski S 2018 Materials (Basel) 11 1567Google Scholar

    [24]

    Kim J, Cote L J, Kim F, Huang J X 2010 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 260Google Scholar

    [25]

    Kovtyukhova N I, Ollivier P J, Martin B R, Mallouk T E, Chizhik S A, Buzaneva E V, Gorchinskiy A D 1999 Chem. Mater. 11 771Google Scholar

    [26]

    Hummers W S, Offeman R E 1958 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80 1339Google Scholar

    [27]

    Chen X, Meng D, Wang B, Li B W, Li W, Bielawski C W, Ruoff R S 2016 Carbon 101 71Google Scholar

    [28]

    Lazauskas A, Baltrusaitis J, Grigaliūnas V, Guobienė A, Prosyčevas I, Narmontas P, Abakevičienė B, Tamulevičius S 2014 Superlattices Microstruct. 75 461Google Scholar

    [29]

    Li J, Ma J, Kumar V, Fu H, Xu C, Wang S, Jia Q, Fan Q, Xi X, Li M, Liu H, Lu Y 2022 Nucleic. Acids. Res. 50 7002Google Scholar

    [30]

    Ma J B, Chen Z, Xu C H, Huang X Y, Jia Q, Zou Z Y, Mi C Y, Ma D F, Lu Y, Zhang H D, Li M 2020 Nucleic. Acids. Res. 48 3156Google Scholar

    [31]

    陈 泽, 马建兵, 黄星榞, 贾棋, 徐春华, 张慧东, 陆颖 2018 物理学报 67 118201Google Scholar

    Chen Z, Ma J B, Huang X Y, Jia Q, Xu C H, Zhang H D, Lu Y 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 118201Google Scholar

    [32]

    Wei A, Wang J X, Long Q, Liu X M, Li X G, Dong X C, Huang W 2011 Mater. Res. Bull. 46 2131Google Scholar

    [33]

    Luo D, Zhang G, Liu J, Sun X 2011 J. Phys. Chem. C. 115 11327Google Scholar

    [34]

    Xu S T, Liu J K, Xue Y, Wu T Y, Zhang Z F 2017 Fuller. Nanotub. Car. N. 25 40Google Scholar

    [35]

    Zhen X J, Huang Y F, Yang S S, Feng Z Z, Wang Y, Li C H, Miao Y J, Yin H 2020 Mater. Lett. 260 126880

    [36]

    Dessinges M N, Maier B, Zhang Y, Peliti M, Bensimon D, Croquette V 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 248102Google Scholar

    [37]

    Baumann C G, Smith S B, Bloomfield V A, Bustamante C 1997 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94 6185Google Scholar

    [38]

    Son S, Takatori S C, Belardi B, Podolski M, Bakalar M H, Fletcher D A 2020 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 117 14209Google Scholar

    [39]

    Demirel G B, Caykara T 2009 Appl. Surf. Sci. 255 6571Google Scholar

    [40]

    Lu J R, Su T J, Thomas R K 1999 J. Colloid. Interf. Sci. 213 426Google Scholar

    [41]

    P. C. Weber J J W, f M. W. Pantoliano, and F. R. Salemme 1992 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 3197Google Scholar

    [42]

    Liu Y L, West S C 2004 Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Bio. 5 937Google Scholar

    [43]

    Clegg R M, Murchie A I, Lilley D M 1994 Biophysical. J. 66 99Google Scholar

    [44]

    McKinney S A, Tan E, Wilson T J, Nahas M K, Declais A C, Clegg R M, Lilley D M J, Ha T 2004 Biochem. Soc. T 32 41Google Scholar

    [45]

    McKinney S A, Declais A C, Lilley D M J, Ha T 2003 Nat. Struct. Biol. 10 93Google Scholar

    [46]

    Hohng S, Joo C, Ha T 2004 Biophys. J. 87 1328Google Scholar

    [47]

    Lee J, Lee S, Ragunathan K, Joo C, Ha T, Hohng S 2010 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 49 9922Google Scholar

    [48]

    Uphoff S, Holden S J, Le Reste L, Periz J, van de Linde S, Heilemann M, Kapanidis A N 2010 Nat. Methods. 7 831Google Scholar

  • 图 1  调控d0的SIFA方法 (a) SIFA方法示意图; (b) 荧光供体光强衰减和表面距离的关系; (c) SIFA探测灵敏度和荧光供体距表面距离的关系

    Figure 1.  SIFA method of adjustable d0: (a) Schematic representation of SIFA method; (b) relationship between degree of attenuation of a fluorescent donor and donor-surface distance; (c) relationship between detection sensitivity of SIFA and donor-surface distance.

    图 2  初始GO以及rGO薄膜的XPS谱 (a) 初始GO薄膜C 1s的XPS谱(左)以及XPS全谱(右); (b) 300 ℃-2 h-rGO薄膜C 1s的XPS谱(左)以及XPS全谱(右); (c) 400 ℃-2 h-rGO薄膜C 1s的XPS谱(左)以及XPS全谱

    Figure 2.  XPS spectra of original GO and rGO thin films: (a) C 1s XPS spectra (left) and XPS survey spectra (right) for original GO thin films; (b) C 1s XPS spectra (left) and XPS survey spectra (right) for 300 ℃-2 h-rGO thin films; (c) C 1s XPS spectra (left) and XPS survey spectra (right) for the 400 ℃-2 h-rGO thin films.

    图 3  荧光标记DNA测量rGO的d0 (a) DNA成像实验示意图; (b) 在300 ℃-2 h-rGO (上)以及400 ℃-2 h-rGO (下)样品腔内观察DNA; Cy3标记在1 bp (c), 9 bp (d)和21 bp (e) 处的DNA在玻璃以及rGO上成像时的单分子光强

    Figure 3.  Determination of d0 of rGO by fluorescence labeled DNA: (a) Schematic representation of DNA imaging; (b) DNA imaging on 300 ℃-2 h-rGO (upper) and 400 ℃-2 h-rGO (lower); intensities of Cy3 labeled at 1 bp (c), 9 bp (d) and 21 bp (e) of DNA on glass and rGO.

    图 4  SIFA观察Holliday junction的构象变换, 在玻璃 (a), GO (b)和400 ℃-2 h-rGO (c)上观察Cy3标记的Holliday junction, 左列为单个Cy3的光强时间曲线, 中间为Cy3的光强统计图, 右列为Holliday junction构象变换导致Cy3光强变化的示意图

    Figure 4.  Observing conformational transformation of Holliday junction by SIFA, observing the Cy3 labeled Holliday junction on glass (a), GO (b) and 400 ℃-2 h-rGO (c), left columns show intensity-time curves of a single Cy3, middle columns show distribution of intensities of Cy3, right columns show schematic representation of the change of Cy3 light intensity caused by the conformational transformation of Holiday junction.

    表 2  DNA Holliday junction的核苷酸序列

    Table 2.  Nucleotide sequence of DNA Holliday junction.

    名称核苷酸序列
    XCCC AGT TGA GAG CTT GAT AGG G
    BCCC TAT CAA GCC GCT GTT ACG G
    RCCC ACC GCT CTT CTC AAC TGG G
    Hbiotin-CCG TAA CAG CGA GAG CGG TGG G(Cy3)
    DownLoad: CSV

    表 1  荧光标记DNA测量rGO的d0

    Table 1.  Determination of d0 of rGO by fluorescence labeled DNA.

    样品1 bp (7.5 nm)9 bp (8.9 nm)21 bp (10.9 nm)
    300 ℃-2h-rGOI = (0.66 ± 0.08)I0
    d0 = (6.4 ± 0.7) nm
    I = (0.79 ± 0.07)I0
    d0 = (6.2 ± 0.6) nm
    I≈ I0
    400 ℃-2h-rGOI = (0.45 ± 0.09)I0
    d0 = (7.9 ± 0.7) nm
    I = (0.60 ± 0.10)I0
    d0 = (8.1± 0.8) nm
    I = (0.80 ± 0.09)I0
    d0 = (7.8 ± 0.9) nm
    DownLoad: CSV
  • [1]

    Lerner E, Barth A, Hendrix J, et al. 2021 Elife 10 e60416Google Scholar

    [2]

    Keller A M, DeVore M S, Stich D G, Vu D M, Causgrove T, Werner J H 2018 Anal. Chem. 90 6109Google Scholar

    [3]

    Ishikawa-Ankerhold H C, Ankerhold R, Drummen G P 2012 Molecules 17 4047Google Scholar

    [4]

    贾棋, 樊秦凯, 侯文清, 杨晨光, 王利邦, 王浩, 徐春华, 李明, 陆颍 2021 物理学报 70 158701Google Scholar

    Jia Q, Fan Q K, Hou W Q, Yang C G, Wang L B, Wang H, Xu C H, Li M, Lu Y 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 158701Google Scholar

    [5]

    Almen M S, Nordstrom K J V, Fredriksson R, Schioth H B 2009 Bmc. Biology. 7 50Google Scholar

    [6]

    White S H, Wimley W C 1999 Annu. Rev. Bioph. Biom. 28 319Google Scholar

    [7]

    马东飞, 侯文清, 徐春华, 赵春雨, 马建兵, 黄星榞, 贾棋, 马璐, 刘聪, 李明, 陆颖 2020 物理学报 69 038701Google Scholar

    Ma D F, Hou W Q, Xu C H, Zhao C Y, Ma J B, Huang X Y, Jia Q, Ma L, Liu C, Li M, Lu Y 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 038701Google Scholar

    [8]

    Ponmalar, II, Cheerla R, Ayappa K G, Basu J K 2019 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116 12839Google Scholar

    [9]

    King C, Raicu V, Hristova K 2017 J. Biol. Chem. 292 5291Google Scholar

    [10]

    King C, Sarabipour S, Byrne P, Leahy D J, Hristova K 2014 Biophys. J. 106 1309Google Scholar

    [11]

    Li Y, Qian Z, Ma L, Hu S, Nong D, Xu C, Ye F, Lu Y, Wei G, Li M 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 12906Google Scholar

    [12]

    Ma L, Li Y, Ma J B, Hu S X, Li M 2018 Biochemistry 57 4735Google Scholar

    [13]

    Jiang X, Yang C G, Qiu J, Ma D F, Xu C, Hu S X, Han W J, Yuan B, Lu Y 2022 Nanoscale 14 17654Google Scholar

    [14]

    Ma L, Hu S X, He X L, Yang N, Chen L C, Yang C G, Ye F F, Wei T T, Li M 2019 Nano. Lett. 19 6937Google Scholar

    [15]

    Kaminska I, Bohlen J, Yaadav R, Schuler P, Raab M, Schroder T, Zahringer J, Zielonka K, Krause S, Tinnefeld P 2021 Adv. Mater. 33 e2101099Google Scholar

    [16]

    Kaminska I, Bohlen J, Rocchetti S, Selbach F, Acuna G P, Tinnefeld P 2019 Nano. Lett. 19 4257Google Scholar

    [17]

    Federspiel F, Froehlicher G, Nasilowski M, Pedetti S, Mahmood A, Doudin B, Park S, Lee J O, Halley D, Dubertret B, Gilliot P, Berciaud S 2015 Nano. Lett. 15 1252Google Scholar

    [18]

    Gaudreau L, Tielrooij K J, Prawiroatmodjo G E D K, Osmond J, de Abajo F J G, Koppens F H L 2013 Nano. Lett. 13 2030Google Scholar

    [19]

    Li W, Wojcik M, Xu K 2019 Nano. Lett. 19 983Google Scholar

    [20]

    Eda G, Fanchini G, Chhowalla M 2008 Nat. Nanotechnol. 3 270Google Scholar

    [21]

    Pei S F, Cheng H M 2012 Carbon 50 3210Google Scholar

    [22]

    Stankovich S, Dikin D A, Piner R D, Kohlhaas K A, Kleinhammes A, Jia Y, Wu Y, Nguyen S T, Ruoff R S 2007 Carbon 45 1558Google Scholar

    [23]

    Sulowska K, Wiwatowski K, Szustakiewicz P, Grzelak J, Lewandowski W, Mackowski S 2018 Materials (Basel) 11 1567Google Scholar

    [24]

    Kim J, Cote L J, Kim F, Huang J X 2010 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 260Google Scholar

    [25]

    Kovtyukhova N I, Ollivier P J, Martin B R, Mallouk T E, Chizhik S A, Buzaneva E V, Gorchinskiy A D 1999 Chem. Mater. 11 771Google Scholar

    [26]

    Hummers W S, Offeman R E 1958 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80 1339Google Scholar

    [27]

    Chen X, Meng D, Wang B, Li B W, Li W, Bielawski C W, Ruoff R S 2016 Carbon 101 71Google Scholar

    [28]

    Lazauskas A, Baltrusaitis J, Grigaliūnas V, Guobienė A, Prosyčevas I, Narmontas P, Abakevičienė B, Tamulevičius S 2014 Superlattices Microstruct. 75 461Google Scholar

    [29]

    Li J, Ma J, Kumar V, Fu H, Xu C, Wang S, Jia Q, Fan Q, Xi X, Li M, Liu H, Lu Y 2022 Nucleic. Acids. Res. 50 7002Google Scholar

    [30]

    Ma J B, Chen Z, Xu C H, Huang X Y, Jia Q, Zou Z Y, Mi C Y, Ma D F, Lu Y, Zhang H D, Li M 2020 Nucleic. Acids. Res. 48 3156Google Scholar

    [31]

    陈 泽, 马建兵, 黄星榞, 贾棋, 徐春华, 张慧东, 陆颖 2018 物理学报 67 118201Google Scholar

    Chen Z, Ma J B, Huang X Y, Jia Q, Xu C H, Zhang H D, Lu Y 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 118201Google Scholar

    [32]

    Wei A, Wang J X, Long Q, Liu X M, Li X G, Dong X C, Huang W 2011 Mater. Res. Bull. 46 2131Google Scholar

    [33]

    Luo D, Zhang G, Liu J, Sun X 2011 J. Phys. Chem. C. 115 11327Google Scholar

    [34]

    Xu S T, Liu J K, Xue Y, Wu T Y, Zhang Z F 2017 Fuller. Nanotub. Car. N. 25 40Google Scholar

    [35]

    Zhen X J, Huang Y F, Yang S S, Feng Z Z, Wang Y, Li C H, Miao Y J, Yin H 2020 Mater. Lett. 260 126880

    [36]

    Dessinges M N, Maier B, Zhang Y, Peliti M, Bensimon D, Croquette V 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 248102Google Scholar

    [37]

    Baumann C G, Smith S B, Bloomfield V A, Bustamante C 1997 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94 6185Google Scholar

    [38]

    Son S, Takatori S C, Belardi B, Podolski M, Bakalar M H, Fletcher D A 2020 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 117 14209Google Scholar

    [39]

    Demirel G B, Caykara T 2009 Appl. Surf. Sci. 255 6571Google Scholar

    [40]

    Lu J R, Su T J, Thomas R K 1999 J. Colloid. Interf. Sci. 213 426Google Scholar

    [41]

    P. C. Weber J J W, f M. W. Pantoliano, and F. R. Salemme 1992 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 3197Google Scholar

    [42]

    Liu Y L, West S C 2004 Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Bio. 5 937Google Scholar

    [43]

    Clegg R M, Murchie A I, Lilley D M 1994 Biophysical. J. 66 99Google Scholar

    [44]

    McKinney S A, Tan E, Wilson T J, Nahas M K, Declais A C, Clegg R M, Lilley D M J, Ha T 2004 Biochem. Soc. T 32 41Google Scholar

    [45]

    McKinney S A, Declais A C, Lilley D M J, Ha T 2003 Nat. Struct. Biol. 10 93Google Scholar

    [46]

    Hohng S, Joo C, Ha T 2004 Biophys. J. 87 1328Google Scholar

    [47]

    Lee J, Lee S, Ragunathan K, Joo C, Ha T, Hohng S 2010 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 49 9922Google Scholar

    [48]

    Uphoff S, Holden S J, Le Reste L, Periz J, van de Linde S, Heilemann M, Kapanidis A N 2010 Nat. Methods. 7 831Google Scholar

  • [1] Luo Ze-Wei, Wu Ge, Chen Zhi, Deng Chi-Nan, Wan Rong, Yang Tao, Zhuang Zheng-Fei, Chen Tong-Sheng. Dual-channel structured illumination super-resolution quantitative fluorescence resonance energy transfer imaging. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(20): 208701. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230853
    [2] Zhang Gai, Xie Hai-Mei, Song Hai-Bin, Li Xiao-Fei, Zhang Qian, Kang Yi-Lan. Experimental analysis of influence of different charge-discharge modes on lithium storage performance of reduced graphene oxide electrodes. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(6): 066501. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211405
    [3] Jia Qi, Fan Qin-Kai, Hou Wen-Qing, Yang Chen-Guang, Wang Li-Bang, Wang Hao, Xu Chun-Hua, Li Ming, Lu Ying. Control of DNA polymerase gp5 chain substitution by DNA double strand annealing pressure. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(15): 158701. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210707
    [4] Li Chuang, Li Wei-Wei, Cai Li, Xie Dan, Liu Bao-Jun, Xiang Lan, Yang Xiao-Kuo, Dong Dan-Na, Liu Jia-Hao, Chen Ya-Bo. Flexible nitrogen dioxide gas sensor based on reduced graphene oxide sensing material using silver nanowire electrode. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(5): 058101. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191390
    [5] Ma Dong-Fei, Hou Wen-Qing, Xu Chun-Hua, Zhao Chun-Yu, Ma Jian-Bing, Huang Xing-Yuan, Jia Qi, Ma Lu, Liu Cong, Li Ming, Lu Ying. Investigation of structure and dynamics of α-synuclein on membrane by quenchers-in-a-liposome fluorescence resonance energy transfer method. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(3): 038701. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191607
    [6] Li Chuang, Cai Li, Li Wei-Wei, Xie Dan, Liu Bao-Jun, Xiang Lan, Yang Xiao-Kuo, Dong Dan-Na, Liu Jia-Hao, Li Cheng, Wei Bo. Adsorption of NO2 by hydrazine hydrate-reduced graphene oxide. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(11): 118102. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182242
    [7] Li Dong-Yang, Zhang Yuan-Xian, Ou Yong-Xiong, Pu Xiao-Yun. Optofluidic fluorescence resonance energy transfer lasing in a polydimethylsiloxane microfluidic channel. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(5): 054203. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181696
    [8] Qiao Zhi-Xing, Qin Cheng-Bing, He Wen-Jun, Gong Ya-Ni, Xiao Lian-Tuan, Zhang Guo-Feng, Chen Rui-Yun, Gao Yan, Jia Suo-Tang. Lifetime modulation of graphene oxide film by laser direct writing for the fabrication of micropatterns. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(6): 066802. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172331
    [9] Chen Hao, Peng Tong-Jiang, Liu Bo, Sun Hong-Juan, Lei De-Hui. Effect of reduction temperature on structure and hydrogen sensitivity of graphene oxides at room temperature. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(8): 080701. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.080701
    [10] Lü Xi-Ming, Li Hui, You Jing, Li Wei, Wang Peng-Ye, Li Ming, Xi Xu-Guang, Dou Shuo-Xing. An optimization algorithm for single-molecule fluorescence resonance (smFRET) data processing. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(11): 118701. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.118701
    [11] Lin Wen-Qiang, Xu Bin, Chen Liang, Zhou Feng, Chen Jun-Lang. Molecular dynamics simulations of the adsorption of bisphenol A on graphene oxide. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(13): 133102. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.133102
    [12] Li Mu-Ye, Li Fang, Wei Lai, He Zhi-Cong, Zhang Jun-Pei, Han Jun-Bo, Lu Pei-Xiang. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer in a aqueous system of CdTe quantum dots and Rhodamine B with two-photon excitation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(10): 108201. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.108201
    [13] He Zhi-Cong, Li Fang, Li Mu-Ye, Wei Lai. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer between CdTe quantum dots and copper phthalocyanine. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(4): 046802. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.046802
    [14] Tang Jian, Liu Ai-Ping, Li Pei-Gang, Shen Jing-Qin, Tang Wei-Hua. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering of gold/graphene oxide composite materials fabricated by interface self-assembling. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(10): 107801. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.107801
    [15] Gao Yan, Chen Rui-Yun, Wu Rui-Xiang, Zhang Guo-Feng, Xiao Lian-Tuan, Jia Suo-Tang. Electric field induced polarization dynamics of graphene oxide. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(23): 233601. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.233601
    [16] Qin Li, Zhang Xi-Tian, Liang Yao, Zhang E, Gao Hong, Zhang Zhi-Guo. Resonant Raman scattering and “negative thermal quenching” of ZnO microflowers. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(6): 3119-3123. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.3119
    [17] PAN DUO-HAI, MA YONG-HONG. A STUDY OF SURFACE-ENHANCED ENERGY TRANSFER EFFECT BETWEEN MOLECULES. Acta Physica Sinica, 1995, 44(12): 1914-1920. doi: 10.7498/aps.44.1914
    [18] FANG YAN, WEI FENG-WEN, WANG YA-LI, YU YONG-CHENG. QUENCHING AND ENHANCEMENT OF FLAORESCENCE OF DYE MOLECULE ON SILVER COLLOID. Acta Physica Sinica, 1994, 43(4): 555-559. doi: 10.7498/aps.43.555
    [19] PAN DUO-MAI, MIAO REN-CAI, LI XIU-YING, ZHANG PENG-XIANG. FLUORESCENCE ENHANCEMENT OR QUENCHING OF MOLECULE AT SERS ACTIVE SURFACES. Acta Physica Sinica, 1989, 38(6): 965-972. doi: 10.7498/aps.38.965
    [20] GAO WEN-BIN, SHEN YU-QI, J. H?GER, W. KRIEGER. VIBRATIONAL ENERGY TRANSFER STUDY OF DICHLOROMETHANE (CH2Cl2) BY LASER INDUCED FLUORESCENCE METHOD. Acta Physica Sinica, 1985, 34(10): 1261-1269. doi: 10.7498/aps.34.1261
Metrics
  • Abstract views:  3413
  • PDF Downloads:  67
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  26 March 2023
  • Accepted Date:  19 April 2023
  • Available Online:  22 May 2023
  • Published Online:  20 July 2023

/

返回文章
返回