-
Relativistic heavy ion collider (RHIC) as a dedicated nuclear facility has made a few major discoveries in physics. This year marks the 30th year STAR Collaboration formation and the 23th year of STAR detector operation and data collection at RHIC. In the last two decades, STAR has collected many datasets, exhibiting scientific versatility and flexibility of the RHIC facility. The total dataset in the first year is less than 1 million good events, and currently there are about 1 billion events per dataset. The Global Hyperon Polarization was proposed in 2004. This immediately prompted the STAR Collaboration to search for this phenomenon from the early datasets. The null results were presented at Quark Matter Conference in Shanghai in 2006 and subsequently published. Although there were peripheral and continuous efforts in the following decade, no positive result has been observed experimentally. This situation changed in the following decade with the upgrade of high data rate and time-of-flight (TOF) detector and the progress of the Beam Energy Scan Phase I (BES-I). The experimental discoveries of the global polarization of hyperons in 2017 and the spin alignment of vector mesons in 2023 at RHIC-STAR confirm the theory which was established nearly twenty years ago. The theory and these measurements open the way to studying the properties of the hot and dense nuclear matter created in high-energy heavy ion collisions from a new degree of freedom, spin. We briefly review these discoveries from the proposals of theory to the experimental measurements, and summarize the related measurements at the existing facilities and the theoretical explanations to the original proposal. The basic understanding and the original proposal are still valid and fundamental, that is, the angular momentum of system can transform into a spin effect observable in experiment. However, it appears that in each case a new model is needed to explain the new experimental observation. We need a more basic theory to help us unify all these spin related phenomena. Over the past five years, STAR has successfully installed 3 new detectors and we have begun to see the physical analysis results from datasets with those new functions. What makes the STAR detector viable after 20 years of operation is its continuous evolution through successful upgrades, with new scientific programs added year by year. The next big thing is to forward upgrade a tracking system (3 layers of silicon strips and 4 layers of sTGC chambers) and a calorimetry system (electromagnetic and hadronic calorimeters). In addition to studying the spin structure of protons by using the polarized proton beams at RHIC, the upgrades also provide a unique ability to investigate the origin of Λ Global Polarization as a function of rapidity and rapidity (de-)correlations in Au+Au collisions. -
Keywords:
- relativistic heavy ion collider /
- STAR /
- global hyperon polarization /
- spin alignment of vector mesons
[1] Liang Z T, Wang X N 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 102301Google Scholar
[2] Liang Z T, Wang X N 2005 Phys. Lett. B 629 20Google Scholar
[3] STAR Collaboration 2007 Phys. Rev. C 76 024915Google Scholar
[4] Chen J H (STAR Collaboration) 2007 J. Phys. G 34 S331Google Scholar
[5] STAR Collaboration 2008 Phys. Rev. C 77 061902 (R)
[6] STAR Collaboration 2017 Nature 548 62Google Scholar
[7] STAR Collaboration 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 132301Google Scholar
[8] ALICE Collaboration 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 172005Google Scholar
[9] STAR Collaboration 2023 Nature 614 244Google Scholar
[10] Wang X N 2023 Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34 15Google Scholar
[11] HADES Collaboration 2022 Phys. Lett. B 835 137506Google Scholar
[12] ALICE Collaboration 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 012301Google Scholar
[13] STAR Collaboration 2023 arXiv: 2303.09074 [nucl-ex]
[14] ALICE Collaboration 2022 arXiv: 2204.10171 [nucl-ex]
[15] Becattini F, Piccinini F, Rizzo J 2008 Phys. Rev. C 77 024906Google Scholar
[16] Becattini F, Karpenko I, Lisa M A, Upsal I, Voloshin S A 2017 Phys. Rev. C 95 054902Google Scholar
[17] Pang L G, Petersen H, Wang Q, Wang X N 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 192301Google Scholar
[18] Fu B C, Liu S Y F, Pang L G, Song H C, Yin Y 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 142301Google Scholar
[19] Becattini F, Buzzegoli M, Palermo A, Inghirami G, Karpenko I 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 272302Google Scholar
[20] Sheng X L, Wang Q, Wang X N 2020 Phys. Rev. D 102 056013Google Scholar
[21] Liang Z T, Song J, Upsal I, Wang Q, Xu Z B 2021 Chin. Phys. C 45 014102Google Scholar
[22] 杨驰, 陈金辉, 马余刚, 徐庆华 2019 中国科学: 物理学 力学 天文学 49 102008Google Scholar
Yang C, Chen J H, Ma Y G, Xu Q H 2019 Sci. Sin. Phys. Mech. & As. 49 102008Google Scholar
[23] Yang C, Yang Q (STAR Collaboration) 2020 JINST 15 C07040Google Scholar
-
图 2 RHIC-STAR通过早期实验数据测量的超子整体极化的结果[3]. 实心点和空心点分别来自200 GeV和62.4 GeV金核-金核对撞数据的测量结果
Figure 2. Global polarization measurements from RHIC-STAR based on the data collected in early period of RHIC operation[3]. The filled and open markers represent the measurements from 200 GeV and 62.4 GeV Au+Au collisions, respectively.
图 4 RHIC-STAR上发现超子整体极化的测量结果[6]. 右边红色与蓝色的实心点分别代表
$\bar{\Lambda }$ 与$ \Lambda $ , 空心点是STAR早期的测量结果Figure 4. Discovery of global polarization of hyperons from RHIC-STAR[6]. The red and blue filled markers in right panel represent the results from
$\bar{\Lambda }$ and$ \Lambda $ , respectively. The open circles are from the early measurements.表 1 1999—2020年以后STAR探测器子系统以及升级的信息, 包括了除美国能源部外主要贡献的经费来源信息
Table 1. List of STAR detector subsystems and upgrades from 1999 to 2020+ with major contributions from funding sources other than DOE.
Detector Primary functions DOE+(in-kind) Year TPC+Trigger |η| < 1 tracking 1999— Barrel EMC |η| < 1 jets$ /\gamma /{{\text{π}}}^{0}/e $ 2004— FTPC Forward tracking (Germany) 2002—2012 L3 Online display (Germany) 2000—2012 SVT/SSD V0/charm (France) 2004—2007 PMD Forward photons (India) 2003—2011 EEMC 1 < η < 2 jets$ /{{\text{π}}}^{0}/e $ (NSF) 2005— Roman Pots Diffractive 2009— TOF PID (China) 2009— FMS/Preshower 2.5 < η < 4.2 (Russia) 2008—2017 DAQ1000 x10 DAQ rate 2008— HLT Online tracking (China/Germany) 2012— FGT 1 < η < 2 $ {W}^{\pm } $ 2012—2013 GMT TPC calibration 2012— HFT/SSD Open charm (France/UIC) 2014—2016 MTD Muon ID (China/India) 2014— EPD Event plane (China) 2018— RHICf η > 5 $ {{\text{π}}}^{0} $ (Japan) 2017 iTPC |η| < 1.5 tracking (China) 2019— eTOF –2 < η < –1 PID (Germany/China) 2019— FCS 2.5 < η < 4 calorimeter (NSF) 2021— FTS 2.5 < η < 4 tracking (NCKU/SDU) 2021— 表 2 现有实验装置的相关测量结果以及除了2004年最初提出的理论外更多的理论解释
Table 2. Summary of the measurements at the existing facilities and what the theory explanations additional to the original proposal in 2004.
现象 实验 特点 理论解释 解释实验 超子整体极化(GHP)的能量依赖性 RHIC[6]
SIS[11]信号强度~1%
随能量减弱自旋与角动量耦合[1,2,17],
涡旋[15,16]理论和实验
符合较好GHP的对撞中心度依赖性 RHIC
LHC信号向偏心碰撞增强 没有很好的理论解释 GHP的横动量依赖性 RHIC 似乎随动量上升趋势 超子局域极化 RHIC[7] LHC[8] 正的正弦振荡信号 切向涡旋性[18,19] 解释信号
的正负值GHP的二三阶椭圆流向依赖性 RHIC[13] 信号向偏心碰撞增强 矢量介子自旋排列 RHIC[9] K*介子零信号
$ \varphi $介子正信号强作用场[20] 理论与实验
定性符合矢量介子自旋排列 LHC[12] K*介子负信号
$ \varphi $介子零信号${J}/{\psi }$ 矢量介子自旋排列 LHC[14] ~5% GHP的快度依赖性 没有实验结果 角动量的几何形状依赖性[21] -
[1] Liang Z T, Wang X N 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 102301Google Scholar
[2] Liang Z T, Wang X N 2005 Phys. Lett. B 629 20Google Scholar
[3] STAR Collaboration 2007 Phys. Rev. C 76 024915Google Scholar
[4] Chen J H (STAR Collaboration) 2007 J. Phys. G 34 S331Google Scholar
[5] STAR Collaboration 2008 Phys. Rev. C 77 061902 (R)
[6] STAR Collaboration 2017 Nature 548 62Google Scholar
[7] STAR Collaboration 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 132301Google Scholar
[8] ALICE Collaboration 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 172005Google Scholar
[9] STAR Collaboration 2023 Nature 614 244Google Scholar
[10] Wang X N 2023 Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34 15Google Scholar
[11] HADES Collaboration 2022 Phys. Lett. B 835 137506Google Scholar
[12] ALICE Collaboration 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 012301Google Scholar
[13] STAR Collaboration 2023 arXiv: 2303.09074 [nucl-ex]
[14] ALICE Collaboration 2022 arXiv: 2204.10171 [nucl-ex]
[15] Becattini F, Piccinini F, Rizzo J 2008 Phys. Rev. C 77 024906Google Scholar
[16] Becattini F, Karpenko I, Lisa M A, Upsal I, Voloshin S A 2017 Phys. Rev. C 95 054902Google Scholar
[17] Pang L G, Petersen H, Wang Q, Wang X N 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 192301Google Scholar
[18] Fu B C, Liu S Y F, Pang L G, Song H C, Yin Y 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 142301Google Scholar
[19] Becattini F, Buzzegoli M, Palermo A, Inghirami G, Karpenko I 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 272302Google Scholar
[20] Sheng X L, Wang Q, Wang X N 2020 Phys. Rev. D 102 056013Google Scholar
[21] Liang Z T, Song J, Upsal I, Wang Q, Xu Z B 2021 Chin. Phys. C 45 014102Google Scholar
[22] 杨驰, 陈金辉, 马余刚, 徐庆华 2019 中国科学: 物理学 力学 天文学 49 102008Google Scholar
Yang C, Chen J H, Ma Y G, Xu Q H 2019 Sci. Sin. Phys. Mech. & As. 49 102008Google Scholar
[23] Yang C, Yang Q (STAR Collaboration) 2020 JINST 15 C07040Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 4150
- PDF Downloads: 119
- Cited By: 0