Jet quenching effect in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

Zhang Shan-Liang; Xing Hong-Xi; Wang En-Ke

doi:10.7498/aps.72.20230993

Abstract

One of the main goals of high-energy nuclear physics is to explore the fundamental properties of quark-gluon plasma (QGP), a new state of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) matter created in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, in which the energetic quarks and gluons, known as fast partons, created prior to the formation of the QGP, traverse the hot-dense medium and experience strong interactions with the constituents of the medium, and eventually lead to the attenuation of jet energy. Such a novel phenomenon, referred to as jet quenching, plays an essential role in probing the transport properties of the QGP. The objective of this paper is to review some of the latest experimental and theoretical progress of jet quenching, such as medium modification on the large $ p_{\rm T} $ hadrons, full jets, and jet substructures in heavy-ion collisions, as well as the challenges in the forefront theoretical investigations.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

1.
Key Laboratory of Atomic and Subatomic Structure and Quantum Control (Ministry of Education), Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Structure and Fundamental Interactions of Matter, Institute of Quantum Matter, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China
2.
Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory of Quantum Matter, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Science, Southern Nuclear Science Computing Center, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China

Corresponding author: Xing Hong-Xi, hxing@m.scnu.edu.cn ; Wang En-Ke, wangek@scnu.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12147131, 12035007, 12022512) and the Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research of Guangdong Province, China (Grant Nos. 22020B0301030008, 2022A1515010683).

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Adcox K, Adler S S, Afanasiev S, et al. 2005 Nucl. Phys. A 757 184 Google Scholar
[2]	Adams J, Aggarwal M M, Ahammed Z, et al. 2005 Nucl. Phys. A 757 102 Google Scholar
[3]	Back B B, Baker M D, Ballintijn M, et al. 2005 Nucl. Phys. A 757 28 Google Scholar
[4]	Arsene I, Bearden I G, Beavis D, et al. 2005 Nucl. Phys. A 757 1 Google Scholar
[5]	Bleicher M, Zabrodin E, Spieles C, et al. 1999 J. Phys. G 25 1859 Google Scholar
[6]	Fodor Z, Katz S D 2004 JHEP 04 050 Google Scholar
[7]	Adam J, et al. 2016 Phys. Rev. C 93 024917 Google Scholar
[8]	Qin G Y, Wang X N 2015 Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 24 1530014 Google Scholar
[9]	Wang X N, Gyulassy M 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 1480 Google Scholar
[10]	Baier R, Dokshitzer Y L, Mueller, et al. 1997 Nucl. Phys. B 483 291 Google Scholar
[11]	Baier R, Dokshitzer Y L, et al. 1998 Phys. Rev. C 58 1706 Google Scholar
[12]	Baier R, Schiff D, Zakharov B G 2000 Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 50 37 Google Scholar
[13]	Eskola K J, Honkanen H, Salgado C A, Wiedemann U A 2005 Nucl. Phys. A 747 511 Google Scholar
[14]	Zakharov B G 1996 JETP Lett. 63 952 Google Scholar
[15]	Wiedemann U A 2001 Nucl. Phys. A 690 731 Google Scholar
[16]	Armesto N, et al. 2012 Phys. Rev. C 86 064904 Google Scholar
[17]	Guo X f, Wang X N 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 3591 Google Scholar
[18]	Wang X N, Guo X f 2001 Nucl. Phys. A 696 788 Google Scholar
[19]	Zhang B W, Wang E, Wang X N 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 072301 Google Scholar
[20]	Zhang B W, Wang X N 2003 Nucl. Phys. A 720 429 Google Scholar
[21]	Majumder A 2012 Phys. Rev. D 85 014023 Google Scholar
[22]	Arnold P B, Moore G D, Yaffe L G 2002 JHEP 06 030 Google Scholar
[23]	Gyulassy M, Levai P, Vitev I 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 5535 Google Scholar
[24]	Gyulassy M, Levai P, Vitev I 2001 Nucl. Phys. B 594 371 Google Scholar
[25]	Zapp K C 2014 Eur. Phys. J. C 74 2762 Google Scholar
[26]	Lokhtin I P, Snigirev A M 2006 Eur. Phys. J. C 45 211 Google Scholar
[27]	Pablos D 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 052301 Google Scholar
[28]	Schenke B, Gale C, Jeon S 2009 Phys. Rev. C 80 054913 Google Scholar
[29]	Ke W, Xu Y, Bass S A 2019 Phys. Rev. C 100 064911 Google Scholar
[30]	Tachibana Y, Chang N B, Qin G Y 2017 Phys. Rev. C 95 044909 Google Scholar
[31]	Wang X N, Zhu Y 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 062301 Google Scholar
[32]	He Y, Luo T, Wang X N, Zhu Y 2015 Phys. Rev. C 91 054908 [Erratum: Phys. Rev. C 97, 019902 (2018)Google Scholar
[33]	Cao S, Luo T, Qin G Y, Wang X N 2016 Phys. Rev. C 94 014909 Google Scholar
[34]	Cao S, et al. 2017 Phys. Rev. C 96 024909 Google Scholar
[35]	Auvinen J, Eskola K J, Renk T 2010 Phys. Rev. C 82 024906 Google Scholar
[36]	Chen W, Cao S, Luo T, et al. 2018 Phys. Lett. B 777 86 Google Scholar
[37]	Luo T, Cao S, He Y, Wang X N 2018 Phys. Lett. B 782 707 Google Scholar
[38]	Zhang S L, Luo T, Wang X N, Zhang B W 2018 Phys. Rev. C 98 021901 Google Scholar
[39]	He Y, Cao S, Chen W, et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. C 99 054911 Google Scholar
[40]	He Y, Pang L G, Wang X N 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 252302 Google Scholar
[41]	He Y, Pang L G, Wang X N 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 122301 Google Scholar
[42]	Chen W, Cao S, Luo T, et al. 2020 Phys. Lett. B 810 135783 Google Scholar
[43]	Adler S S, et al. 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 072301 Google Scholar
[44]	Adams J, et al. 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 172302 Google Scholar
[45]	Adler C, et al. 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 082302 Google Scholar
[46]	Aamodt K, et al. 2011 Phys. Lett. B 696 30 Google Scholar
[47]	Chatrchyan S, et al. 2012 Eur. Phys. J. C 72 1945 Google Scholar
[48]	Burke K M, et al. 2014 Phys. Rev. C 90 014909 Google Scholar
[49]	Cao S, et al. 2021 Phys. Rev. C 104 024905 Google Scholar
[50]	Xie M, Ke W, Zhang H, Wang X N 2023 Phys. Rev. C 108 L011901 Google Scholar
[51]	Zhang S L, Liao J, Qin G Y, et al. 2023 Sci. Bull. 68 2003 Google Scholar
[52]	Xing W J, Cao S, Qin G Y 2023 arXiv: 2303.12485
[53]	Chen X, Zhang H, Zhang B W, et al. 2010 J. Phys. 37 015004 Google Scholar
[54]	Sterman G F, Weinberg S 1977 Phys. Rev. Lett. 39 1436 Google Scholar
[55]	Chatrchyan S, et al. 2011 Phys. Rev. C 84 024906 Google Scholar
[56]	Aad G, et al. 2013 Phys. Lett. B 719 220 Google Scholar
[57]	Sirunyan A M, et al. 2018 Phys. Lett. B 785 14 Google Scholar
[58]	Sirunyan A M, et al. 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 082301 Google Scholar
[59]	Dai W, Vitev I, Zhang B W 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 142001 Google Scholar
[60]	Chen L, Qin G Y, Wang L, et al. 2018 Nucl. Phys. B 933 306 Google Scholar
[61]	Neufeld R B, Vitev I, Zhang B W 2011 Phys. Rev. C 83 034902 Google Scholar
[62]	Neufeld R B, Vitev I 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 242001 Google Scholar
[63]	Casalderrey-Solana J, Gulhan D C, Milhano J G, et al. 2016 JHEP 03 053 Google Scholar
[64]	Kunnawalkam Elayavalli R, Zapp K C 2016 Eur. Phys. J. C 76 695 Google Scholar
[65]	Kang Z B, Vitev I, Xing H 2017 Phys. Rev. C 96 014912 Google Scholar
[66]	Zhang S L, Wang X N, Zhang B W 2022 Phys. Rev. C 105 054902 Google Scholar
[67]	Aad G, et al. 2023 Phys. Lett. B 846 138154 Google Scholar
[68]	Aad G, et al. 2023 Eur. Phys. J. C 83 438 Google Scholar
[69]	Aaboud M, et al. 2019 Phys. Lett. B 790 108 Google Scholar
[70]	Zhang S L, Wang E, Xing H, et al. 2023 arXiv: 2303.14881
[71]	Horowitz W A, Gyulassy M 2008 Phys. Lett. B 666 320 Google Scholar
[72]	Huang J, Kang Z B, Vitev I 2013 Phys. Lett. B 726 251 Google Scholar
[73]	Xing W J, Cao S, Qin G Y, Xing H 2020 Phys. Lett. B 805 135424 Google Scholar
[74]	Sirunyan A M, et al. 2021 JHEP 05 284 Google Scholar
[75]	ALICE 2023 arXiv: 2303.00592
[76]	Zhang S L, Yang M Q 2023 In preparation
[77]	Zhang S L, Yang M Q, Zhang B W 2022 Eur. Phys. J. C 82 414 Google Scholar
[78]	Acharya S, et al. 2018 Phys. Lett. B 776 249 Google Scholar
[79]	Connors M, Nattrass C, Reed R, Salur S 2018 Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 025005 Google Scholar
[80]	Cunqueiro L 2016 Nucl. Phys. A 956 593 Google Scholar
[81]	Yan J, Chen S Y, Dai W, et al. 2021 Chin. Phys. C 45 024102 Google Scholar
[82]	Zardoshti N 2017 Nucl. Phys. A 967 560 Google Scholar
[83]	Krohn D, Schwartz M D, Lin T, Waalewijn W J 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 212001 Google Scholar
[84]	Chen S Y, Zhang B W, Wang E K 2020 Chin. Phys. C 44 024103 Google Scholar
[85]	Chen S Y, Dai W, Zhang S L, et al. 2020 Eur. Phys. J. C 80 865 Google Scholar
[86]	Sirunyan A M, et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 152001 Google Scholar
[87]	Sirunyan A M, et al. 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 242301 Google Scholar
[88]	Aaboud M, et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 042001 Google Scholar
[89]	Sirunyan A M, et al. 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 142302 Google Scholar
[90]	Chang N B, Tachibana Y, Qin G Y 2020 Phys. Lett. B 801 135181 Google Scholar
[91]	Zhang S L, Xing H, Zhang B W 2022 arXiv: 2209.15336
[92]	Gottschalk T D 1983 Nucl. Phys. B 214 201 Google Scholar
[93]	Gottschalk T D 1984 Nucl. Phys. B 239 349 Google Scholar
[94]	Gottschalk T D, Morris D A 1987 Nucl. Phys. B 288 729 Google Scholar
[95]	Webber B R 1984 Nucl. Phys. B 238 492 Google Scholar
[96]	Larkoski A J, Marzani S, Soyez G, et al. 2014 JHEP 05 146 Google Scholar
[97]	Acharya S, et al. 2020 Phys. Lett. B 802 135227 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 (a) 根据不同能量损失机制对RHIC和LHC 中强子的核修正因子进行分析提取QGP的输运参数$ {\hat{q}} $与初始温度的依赖关系^[48]; (b) 根据不同的模型以及参数化形式提取的输运参数$ {\hat{q}} $对介质演化温度的依赖关系^[49,50]

Figure 1. (a) The dependence of transport coefficient $ {\hat{q}} $ on the initial temperature T, extracted from the nuclear modification factor of hadrons from RHIC and LHC measurements^[48], based on four different energy lose formalism; (b) the dependence of transport coefficient $ {\hat{q}} $ on the evolution temperature T, extracted with different models and parameterized functions^[49,50]

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 (a) 通过$ J/\varPsi $的核修正因子贝叶斯分析提取的胶子和粲夸克的能量损失分布^[51]; (b) 同时对轻味强子, D介子以及B介子衰变的$ J/\varPsi $ 的核修正因子进行系统的贝叶斯分析提取的胶子, 轻味夸克, c夸克和b夸克的平均能量损失份额^[52]

Figure 2. (a) The final extracted energy loss distributions of charm quark and gluon from Bayesian analysis to experimental data on inclusive J/ψ ^[51]; (b) fractional jet energy loss of gluon, light quarks, charm quarks and bottom quarks from Bayesian analysis to experimental data on the R_AA of charged hadrons, D mesons and B-decayed J/ψ ^[52].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 单半举喷注, 光子标记喷注和b夸克喷注的微分散射截面, 夸克胶子份额和核修正因子^[70], 并与实验测量结果进行比较

Figure 3. The differential cross sections of, fraction of quark and gluon in, nuclear modification factor of inclusive jet, γ-tagged jet, and b-jet^[70] as well as the comparison with experimental data^[67-69].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 (a) 5.02 TeV Pb+Pb碰撞中胶子喷注(红色)、夸克喷注(蓝色)、单举喷注(绿色)的核修正因子$R_{{\rm{AA}}} $的中心度依赖^[70]; (b) 最终拟合的b-喷注、单举喷注、光子标记喷注的核修正因子$ R_{{\rm{AA}}}$, 以及数据驱动提取出的胶子喷注、轻夸克喷注和b夸克喷注的$ R_{{\rm{AA}}}$和能量损失分布^[70]

Figure 4. (a) The centrality dependence of final fitted gluon jet (red), quark jet (blue) and inclusive jet (green) $ R_{{\rm{AA}}} $ in Pb+Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV^[70]; (b) final fitted nuclear modification factor $ R_{{\rm{AA}}} $ of b-jets, inclusive jet and γ-tagged jet, and the data-driven extracted $ R_{{\rm{AA}}} $ and energy loss distributions of gluon, light quark, and b-quark initiated jets^[70].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 (a) CMS测量的在不同横动量区间内喷注锥角为R = 0.3—1.0的单半举喷注的核修正因子与R = 0.2的结果的比值对R的分布, 及与理论模型计算结果的比较^[74]; (b) ALICE测量的R = 0.6的带电强子重建喷注的核修正因子与R = 0.2的结果的比值, 并与理论模型进行比较^[75]

Figure 5. (a) The double ratio $ R_{{\rm{AA}}} $ for inclusive jet, as a function of R, for R = 0.3–1.0 with respect to R = 0.2 in various $ p_{\rm{T}}^J $ ranges for the 0–10% centrality class as well as the comparison with model calculations^[74]; (b) the ratio of charged jet $ R_{{\rm{AA}}} $ with R = 0.6 to that with R = 0.2 measured by ALICE^[75] and the comparison with model calculations.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 6 (a)部分子层次和强子层次的不同喷注锥角的微分散射截面与R = 1.0的微分散射截面的比值并与实验结果的比较(左图), 强子层次的散射截面与部分子层次的散射截面的比值(右图); (b)单喷注以及重建喷注的核修正因子对喷注锥角的依赖分布. 图片来源于文献[76]

Figure 6. (a) The ratio of inclusive jet cross section with R = 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 with respect to R = 1.0 calculated as parton level and hadron level as well as the comparison with CMS data (left); the ratio of jet cross section at hadron level to parton level with different jet cones (right); (b) jet cone dependent $ R_{{\rm{AA}}} $ of inclusive jet and reclustered jet. Pictures are taken from Ref [76].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 7 基于部分子层次和团簇强子模型计算的光子标记喷注的喷注形状(a)与光子标记喷注的碎裂函数(b)以及它们的介质修正^[91]

Figure 7. Distributions of and $ R_{{\rm{AA}}} $ of jet shape (a) and jet fragmentation function (b) calculated at parton and hadron level^[91].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 8 基于团簇强子化模型计算的质子-质子碰撞和核核碰撞中Z玻色子与其标记的带电强子的方位角关联(a)以及Z玻色子标记的带电强子相对于Z玻色的碎裂函数(b)^[91]

Figure 8. (a)The azimuthal angle correlation $ \Delta \phi_{Z, {\rm{ch}}} $ between charged hadron and the recoiling Z boson; (b) the fragmentation pattern of the charged hadron recoiling from a Z boson^[91].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 9 CMS测量的单喷注在不同的动量区间内的修饰的碎裂函数$ z_{\rm g} $的介质修正, 并与理论模型的计算结果进行比较^[89]

Figure 9. Medium modification on groomed fragmentation function $ z_{\rm{g}} $ of inclusive jet in different $ p_{\rm{T}} $ intervals measured by CMS and the comparison with model calculations^[89].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

[1]	Adcox K, Adler S S, Afanasiev S, et al. 2005 Nucl. Phys. A 757 184 Google Scholar
[2]	Adams J, Aggarwal M M, Ahammed Z, et al. 2005 Nucl. Phys. A 757 102 Google Scholar
[3]	Back B B, Baker M D, Ballintijn M, et al. 2005 Nucl. Phys. A 757 28 Google Scholar
[4]	Arsene I, Bearden I G, Beavis D, et al. 2005 Nucl. Phys. A 757 1 Google Scholar
[5]	Bleicher M, Zabrodin E, Spieles C, et al. 1999 J. Phys. G 25 1859 Google Scholar
[6]	Fodor Z, Katz S D 2004 JHEP 04 050 Google Scholar
[7]	Adam J, et al. 2016 Phys. Rev. C 93 024917 Google Scholar
[8]	Qin G Y, Wang X N 2015 Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 24 1530014 Google Scholar
[9]	Wang X N, Gyulassy M 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 1480 Google Scholar
[10]	Baier R, Dokshitzer Y L, Mueller, et al. 1997 Nucl. Phys. B 483 291 Google Scholar
[11]	Baier R, Dokshitzer Y L, et al. 1998 Phys. Rev. C 58 1706 Google Scholar
[12]	Baier R, Schiff D, Zakharov B G 2000 Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 50 37 Google Scholar
[13]	Eskola K J, Honkanen H, Salgado C A, Wiedemann U A 2005 Nucl. Phys. A 747 511 Google Scholar
[14]	Zakharov B G 1996 JETP Lett. 63 952 Google Scholar
[15]	Wiedemann U A 2001 Nucl. Phys. A 690 731 Google Scholar
[16]	Armesto N, et al. 2012 Phys. Rev. C 86 064904 Google Scholar
[17]	Guo X f, Wang X N 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 3591 Google Scholar
[18]	Wang X N, Guo X f 2001 Nucl. Phys. A 696 788 Google Scholar
[19]	Zhang B W, Wang E, Wang X N 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 072301 Google Scholar
[20]	Zhang B W, Wang X N 2003 Nucl. Phys. A 720 429 Google Scholar
[21]	Majumder A 2012 Phys. Rev. D 85 014023 Google Scholar
[22]	Arnold P B, Moore G D, Yaffe L G 2002 JHEP 06 030 Google Scholar
[23]	Gyulassy M, Levai P, Vitev I 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 5535 Google Scholar
[24]	Gyulassy M, Levai P, Vitev I 2001 Nucl. Phys. B 594 371 Google Scholar
[25]	Zapp K C 2014 Eur. Phys. J. C 74 2762 Google Scholar
[26]	Lokhtin I P, Snigirev A M 2006 Eur. Phys. J. C 45 211 Google Scholar
[27]	Pablos D 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 052301 Google Scholar
[28]	Schenke B, Gale C, Jeon S 2009 Phys. Rev. C 80 054913 Google Scholar
[29]	Ke W, Xu Y, Bass S A 2019 Phys. Rev. C 100 064911 Google Scholar
[30]	Tachibana Y, Chang N B, Qin G Y 2017 Phys. Rev. C 95 044909 Google Scholar
[31]	Wang X N, Zhu Y 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 062301 Google Scholar
[32]	He Y, Luo T, Wang X N, Zhu Y 2015 Phys. Rev. C 91 054908 [Erratum: Phys. Rev. C 97, 019902 (2018)Google Scholar
[33]	Cao S, Luo T, Qin G Y, Wang X N 2016 Phys. Rev. C 94 014909 Google Scholar
[34]	Cao S, et al. 2017 Phys. Rev. C 96 024909 Google Scholar
[35]	Auvinen J, Eskola K J, Renk T 2010 Phys. Rev. C 82 024906 Google Scholar
[36]	Chen W, Cao S, Luo T, et al. 2018 Phys. Lett. B 777 86 Google Scholar
[37]	Luo T, Cao S, He Y, Wang X N 2018 Phys. Lett. B 782 707 Google Scholar
[38]	Zhang S L, Luo T, Wang X N, Zhang B W 2018 Phys. Rev. C 98 021901 Google Scholar
[39]	He Y, Cao S, Chen W, et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. C 99 054911 Google Scholar
[40]	He Y, Pang L G, Wang X N 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 252302 Google Scholar
[41]	He Y, Pang L G, Wang X N 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 122301 Google Scholar
[42]	Chen W, Cao S, Luo T, et al. 2020 Phys. Lett. B 810 135783 Google Scholar
[43]	Adler S S, et al. 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 072301 Google Scholar
[44]	Adams J, et al. 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 172302 Google Scholar
[45]	Adler C, et al. 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 082302 Google Scholar
[46]	Aamodt K, et al. 2011 Phys. Lett. B 696 30 Google Scholar
[47]	Chatrchyan S, et al. 2012 Eur. Phys. J. C 72 1945 Google Scholar
[48]	Burke K M, et al. 2014 Phys. Rev. C 90 014909 Google Scholar
[49]	Cao S, et al. 2021 Phys. Rev. C 104 024905 Google Scholar
[50]	Xie M, Ke W, Zhang H, Wang X N 2023 Phys. Rev. C 108 L011901 Google Scholar
[51]	Zhang S L, Liao J, Qin G Y, et al. 2023 Sci. Bull. 68 2003 Google Scholar
[52]	Xing W J, Cao S, Qin G Y 2023 arXiv: 2303.12485
[53]	Chen X, Zhang H, Zhang B W, et al. 2010 J. Phys. 37 015004 Google Scholar
[54]	Sterman G F, Weinberg S 1977 Phys. Rev. Lett. 39 1436 Google Scholar
[55]	Chatrchyan S, et al. 2011 Phys. Rev. C 84 024906 Google Scholar
[56]	Aad G, et al. 2013 Phys. Lett. B 719 220 Google Scholar
[57]	Sirunyan A M, et al. 2018 Phys. Lett. B 785 14 Google Scholar
[58]	Sirunyan A M, et al. 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 082301 Google Scholar
[59]	Dai W, Vitev I, Zhang B W 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 142001 Google Scholar
[60]	Chen L, Qin G Y, Wang L, et al. 2018 Nucl. Phys. B 933 306 Google Scholar
[61]	Neufeld R B, Vitev I, Zhang B W 2011 Phys. Rev. C 83 034902 Google Scholar
[62]	Neufeld R B, Vitev I 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 242001 Google Scholar
[63]	Casalderrey-Solana J, Gulhan D C, Milhano J G, et al. 2016 JHEP 03 053 Google Scholar
[64]	Kunnawalkam Elayavalli R, Zapp K C 2016 Eur. Phys. J. C 76 695 Google Scholar
[65]	Kang Z B, Vitev I, Xing H 2017 Phys. Rev. C 96 014912 Google Scholar
[66]	Zhang S L, Wang X N, Zhang B W 2022 Phys. Rev. C 105 054902 Google Scholar
[67]	Aad G, et al. 2023 Phys. Lett. B 846 138154 Google Scholar
[68]	Aad G, et al. 2023 Eur. Phys. J. C 83 438 Google Scholar
[69]	Aaboud M, et al. 2019 Phys. Lett. B 790 108 Google Scholar
[70]	Zhang S L, Wang E, Xing H, et al. 2023 arXiv: 2303.14881
[71]	Horowitz W A, Gyulassy M 2008 Phys. Lett. B 666 320 Google Scholar
[72]	Huang J, Kang Z B, Vitev I 2013 Phys. Lett. B 726 251 Google Scholar
[73]	Xing W J, Cao S, Qin G Y, Xing H 2020 Phys. Lett. B 805 135424 Google Scholar
[74]	Sirunyan A M, et al. 2021 JHEP 05 284 Google Scholar
[75]	ALICE 2023 arXiv: 2303.00592
[76]	Zhang S L, Yang M Q 2023 In preparation
[77]	Zhang S L, Yang M Q, Zhang B W 2022 Eur. Phys. J. C 82 414 Google Scholar
[78]	Acharya S, et al. 2018 Phys. Lett. B 776 249 Google Scholar
[79]	Connors M, Nattrass C, Reed R, Salur S 2018 Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 025005 Google Scholar
[80]	Cunqueiro L 2016 Nucl. Phys. A 956 593 Google Scholar
[81]	Yan J, Chen S Y, Dai W, et al. 2021 Chin. Phys. C 45 024102 Google Scholar
[82]	Zardoshti N 2017 Nucl. Phys. A 967 560 Google Scholar
[83]	Krohn D, Schwartz M D, Lin T, Waalewijn W J 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 212001 Google Scholar
[84]	Chen S Y, Zhang B W, Wang E K 2020 Chin. Phys. C 44 024103 Google Scholar
[85]	Chen S Y, Dai W, Zhang S L, et al. 2020 Eur. Phys. J. C 80 865 Google Scholar
[86]	Sirunyan A M, et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 152001 Google Scholar
[87]	Sirunyan A M, et al. 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 242301 Google Scholar
[88]	Aaboud M, et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 042001 Google Scholar
[89]	Sirunyan A M, et al. 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 142302 Google Scholar
[90]	Chang N B, Tachibana Y, Qin G Y 2020 Phys. Lett. B 801 135181 Google Scholar
[91]	Zhang S L, Xing H, Zhang B W 2022 arXiv: 2209.15336
[92]	Gottschalk T D 1983 Nucl. Phys. B 214 201 Google Scholar
[93]	Gottschalk T D 1984 Nucl. Phys. B 239 349 Google Scholar
[94]	Gottschalk T D, Morris D A 1987 Nucl. Phys. B 288 729 Google Scholar
[95]	Webber B R 1984 Nucl. Phys. B 238 492 Google Scholar
[96]	Larkoski A J, Marzani S, Soyez G, et al. 2014 JHEP 05 146 Google Scholar
[97]	Acharya S, et al. 2020 Phys. Lett. B 802 135227 Google Scholar

[1]	Shou Qi-Ye, Zhao Jie, Xu Hao-Jie, Li Wei, Wang Gang, Tang Ai-Hong, Wang Fu-Qiang. Progress on the experimental search for the chiral magnetic effect, the chiral vortical effect, and the chiral magnetic wave. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(11): 112504. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230109
[2]	Pu Shi, Huang Xu-Guang. Relativistic spin hydrodynamics. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(7): 071202. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230036
[3]	Gao Jian-Hua, Huang Xu-Guang, Liang Zuo-Tang, Wang Qun, Wang Xin-Nian. Spin-orbital coupling in strong interaction and global spin polarization. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(7): 072501. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230102
[4]	Liu He, Chu Peng-Cheng. Elliptic flow splitting of charged pions in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(13): 132101. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230454
[5]	Jiang Ze-Fang, Wu Xiang-Yu, Yu Hua-Qing, Cao Shan-Shan, Zhang Ben-Wei. The direct flow of charged particles and the global polarization of hyperons in 200 AGeV Au+Au collisions at RHIC. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(7): 072504. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222391
[6]	Yang Shuai, Tang Ze-Bo, Yang Chi, Zha Wang-Mei. Impact parameter dependence of photon-photon interactions in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(20): 201201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230948
[7]	Guan Na-Na. Effect of inelastic scattering process of gluons on dilepton productions of quark-gluon plasma. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(14): 142501. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.142501
[8]	Wang Yu, Chen Zai-Gao, Lei Yi-An. Simulation of 0.14 THz relativistic backward-wave oscillator filled with plasma. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(12): 125204. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.125204
[9]	Chen Xiao-Fan. Coherence parameters of partially chaotic sources in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(9): 092501. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.092501
[10]	Liu Jiong, Yuan Ye-Fei, Deng Xiao-Long. Characteristics of the synchrotron radiation from relativistic electrons in plasma. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(2): 1214-1223. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.1214
[11]	Xu Hui, Sheng Zheng-Ming, Zhang Jie. Relativistic effects on resonance absorption in laser-plasma interaction. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(10): 5354-5361. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.5354
[12]	Wang Bin, Tang Chang-Jian, Liu Pu-Kun. Cherenkov radiation of relativistic electron beam in the ion-channel. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(11): 5953-5958. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.5953
[13]	Duan Wen-Shan, Hong Xue-Ren. Ion acoustic solitary waves in a weakly relativistic plasma under transverse p erturbations. Acta Physica Sinica, 2003, 52(6): 1337-1339. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.1337
[14]	ZENG GUI-HUA, ZHU HONG-WEN, XU ZHI-ZHAN. RELATIVISTIC EVEN-ORDER HARMONICS GENERATED IN UNDERDENSE PLASMA. Acta Physica Sinica, 2001, 50(10): 1946-1949. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.1946
[15]	HE ZE-JUN, JIANG WEI-YUAN, ZHU ZHI-YUAN, LIU BO. A SIGNATURE FOR THE FORMATION OF THE QUARK-GLUON PLASMA IN RELATIVISTIC NUCLEUS-NUCLEUS COLLISIONS. Acta Physica Sinica, 2000, 49(5): 911-914. doi: 10.7498/aps.49.911
[16]	ZHOU XIAO-BING, WANG ZHI-JUN, SHENG GUANG-ZHAO. RELATIVISTICALLY STOCHASTIC ACCELERATION OF ELECTRONS IN PLASMA DRIVEN BY A STANDING WAVE. Acta Physica Sinica, 1995, 44(11): 1776-1782. doi: 10.7498/aps.44.1776
[17]	QU YI-ZHI, GONG XIAO-MIN, LI JIA-MING. RELATIVISTIC EFFECT IN INELASTIC COLLISION OF ELECTRON WITH ATOM OR ION. Acta Physica Sinica, 1995, 44(11): 1719-1726. doi: 10.7498/aps.44.1719
[18]	WU JUN-LING. THE RELATIVISTIC ELECTRON CYCLOTRON WAVE DISPERSION RELATION IN PLASMA. Acta Physica Sinica, 1993, 42(5): 775-784. doi: 10.7498/aps.42.775
[19]	GUO SHI-CHONG, CAI SHI-DONG. DISPERSION RELATION OF GENERAL MAGNETICALLY CONFINED WEAK RELATIVISTIC PLASMAS. Acta Physica Sinica, 1987, 36(7): 870-880. doi: 10.7498/aps.36.870
[20]	KONG FAN-MEI, LUO MA, HAN TAO, WEN NUAN. EXPLORING THE GLUON INFORMATION BY THE JET-CHARGE-CROSS SECTION METHOD. Acta Physica Sinica, 1986, 35(2): 152-160. doi: 10.7498/aps.35.152

Catalog

Vol. 72, Issue 20 - 2023-10-20

Metrics

Abstract views: 3411
PDF Downloads: 126
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板