-
Active mass injection serves as an effective thermal protection technique by significantly reducing wall heat flux. However, it inherently alters boundary layer stability characteristics, leading to substantial impacts on the laminar-to-turbulent transition process. Crucially, the underlying mechanisms governing how different injected gases modulate flow stability remain unclear. To systematically analyze the effects of different gas injections on flow stability, this study investigates gas-specific mass injection effects by employing a multicomponent Navier-Stokes solver to compute flow fields with air, argon, and nitrogen injections. The influence of mass injection on flow stability was analyzed using linear stability theory, with subsequent differentiation of the distinct effects attributable to various injectant properties. The study demonstrates that mass injection displaces the freestream gas, forming an injection layer near the wall and consequently increasing the boundary layer thickness. Herein, the main boundary layer retains properties similar to the original boundary layer, while the injection layer exhibits significantly reduced temperature and velocity gradients, resulting in decreased wall heat flux and skin friction. Linear stability analysis reveals that while mass injection excites multiple higher-order instability modes, the second mode remains dominant. Notably, mass injection reduces the unstable region of the second mode and significantly decreases the integrated disturbance amplitude, thereby suppressing transition. This stabilizing effect is more pronounced with lighter gases. The differences in injected gas properties are mainly reflected in the viscosity coefficient, thermal conductivity, relative molecular weight, and diffusivity. Among these, the boundary layer thickness is primarily affected by the viscosity coefficient, relative molecular weight, and diffusivity of the injected gas, while the temperature within the boundary layer decreases with increasing thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity of the injected gas. The influence of injected gas properties on flow stability manifests through two distinct pathways: (1) modification of the base flow profile, and (2) alteration of mixed gas properties. Specifically, the transport coefficients (viscosity and diffusivity) of the injected gas primarily affect instability characteristics through Pathway 1, while the specific heat capacity mainly operates via Pathway 2. The relative molecular weight exerts combined effects through both pathways.
-
Keywords:
- Mass Injection /
- Linear Stability Theory /
- Hypersonic Boundary Layer
-
[1] Zhu G S, Yao S Y, Duan Y 2023 Acta Aeronaut. Astronaut. Sin. 44529049（in Chinese）[朱广生，姚世勇，段毅2023航空学报44529049]
[2] Wen J H, Li C H, Tu G H, Wan B B, Duan M C, Zhang R 2025 Acta Phys. Sin. 74124701（in Chinese）[温景浩，李晨辉，涂国华，万兵兵，段茂昌，张锐2025物理学报74124701]
[3] Shen X B, Zeng L, Liu X, Zhou S G, Ge Q. 2022 Acta Aerodyn. Sin. 401（in Chinese）[沈斌贤，曾磊，刘骁, 周述光，葛强2022空气动力学报学报401]
[4] Fan Y X, Zhao R, Zuo Z X, Yang G, Li N 2023 Acta Aeronaut. Astronaut. Sin. 44528587（in Chinese）[樊宇翔，赵瑞，左政玄，阳光，李宁2023航空学报44528587]
[5] Ye Y D 2015 Sci. Bull. 601095（in Chinese）[叶友达2015科学通报601095]
[6] Zhao Y P 2022 Ph. D. Dissertation （Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University） (in Chinese) [赵一朴2022博士学位论文(北京:北京交通大学)]
[7] Pappas C C, Okuno A F 1960 J. Aerosp. Sci. 27321
[8] Marvin J G, Akin C M 1970 AIAA J. 8857
[9] Wang X, Zhong X, Ma Y 2011 AIAA J. 491336
[10] Zhao G F 1994 Theor. Appl. Mech. 26631（in Chinese）[赵耕夫1994力学学报26631]
[11] Zhao G F 1999 Acta Aerodyn. Sin. 1721（in Chinese）[赵耕夫1999空气动力学学报1721]
[12] Johnson H B, Gronvall J E, Candler G V 200947th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition Orlando, Florida, January 5,2009938
[13] Ghaffari S, Marxen O, Gianluca I, Eric S G 201048th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition Orlando, Florida, January 4, 2010706
[14] Li J, Su W, Huang Z F, Liu W L 2020 J. Aerosp. Power 35280（in Chinese）[李瑾，苏伟，黄章峰，刘文伶2020航空动力学报35280]
[15] Kumar C, Prakash A 2022 Phys. Fluids 34064109
[16] Li F, Choudhari M, Chang C, White J 2013 Phys. Fluids 25104107
[17] Wagnild R M, Candler G V, Leyva L A, Jewell J S, Hornung H G 201048th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition Orlando, Florida, January 4, 20101244
[18] Lysenko V I, Gaponov S A, Smorodsky B V, Yermolaev Y G, Kosinov A D, Semionov N V 2016 J. Fluid Mech. 798751
[19] Lysenko V I, Smorodsky B V, Ermolaev Y G, Kosinov A D 2018 Thermophys. Aeromech. 25183
[20] Gaponov S A, Smorodsky B V 2016 Int. J. Theor. Appl. Mech. 197
[21] Gaponov S A, Smorodsky B V 2017 AIP Conference Proceedings. Novosibirsk, Russia, 1893030087
[22] Miró Miró F, Pinna F 2018 Phys. Fluids 30084106
[23] Miró Miró F, Pinna F 2020 J. Fluid Mech. 890 R4
[24] Han L B, Han Y F 2024 Phys. Fluids 36036110
[25] Su C H, Zhou H 2009 Sci. China, Ser. G 39123（in Chinese）[苏彩虹周恒2009中国科学(G辑) 39123]
[26] Luo J S 2015 Acta Aeronaut. Astronaut. Sin. 36357（in Chinese）[罗纪生2015航空学报36357]
[27] Su C H 2008 Ph. D. Dissertation （Tianjin: Tianjin University） (in Chinese) [苏彩虹2008博士学位论文(天津:天津大学)]
[28] Mortensen C H 2015 Ph. D. Dissertation （Los Angeles: University of California）
[29] Miró Miró F, Dehairs P, Pinna F, Gkolia M, Masutti D, Regert T, Chazot O 2019 AIAA J. 571567
[30] Fedorov A, Tumin A 2011 AIAA J. 491647
Metrics
- Abstract views: 150
- PDF Downloads: 4
- Cited By: 0
下载:
