-
Bi2O2Se是一种新型半导体材料, 具有载流子迁移率高、空气中稳定和自旋轨道耦合强等优点, 并且其合成方法多种多样, 应用范围十分广泛. 但已有研究大多集中在其二维薄膜, 本文介绍一种使用三温区管式炉通过化学气相沉积生长Bi2O2Se一维纳米线的方法, 研究了云母衬底处于水平方向不同位置以及竖直方向不同高度对Bi2O2Se纳米线生长的影响, 并归纳出适于其生长的优化条件. 之后, 基于生长的Bi2O2Se纳米线构建了超导量子干涉器件, 并观测到随磁场的超导量子干涉, 为拓宽Bi2O2Se纳米线的应用提供了思路.
-
关键词:
- Bi2O2Se纳米线 /
- 化学气相沉积 /
- 超导量子干涉器
Bi2O2Se is a new type of semiconductor material, which has the advantages of high carrier mobility, air stability, strong spin-orbit coupling, etc. It has a variety of synthesis methods and a wide range of applications. In the past few years, many explorations have been made in the synthesis, large-size growth, and applications of Bi2O2Se. It has been applied to field effect transistors, infrared photodetectors, semiconductor devices, heterojunctions, spin electronics, etc. Since nanowire has a larger surface area-to-volume ratio than nano-film, nanowire may have greater advantages in gate regulation and strong spin-orbit coupling, and these properties can play a crucial role in certain fields. However, most of the studies focused on its two-dimensional films, and there are less researches of its one-dimensional counterpart. In this work, a method of growing Bi2O2Se one-dimensional nanowires by chemical vapor deposition in a three-temperature-zone tubular furnace is introduced. High-quality suspended Bi2O2Se nanowires are obtained. In addition, the effects on the Bi2O2Se nanowire growth of the position of the mica substrates, i.e, different horizontal positions and vertical heights in the quartz boat, are studied, and the optimal conditions for the growth are summarized. The nanowires are characterized by atomic force microscope and energy dispersive spectrometer to show the information about the size and component. Then, superconducting quantum interference device based on the Bi2O2Se nanowires is constructed, and the superconducting quantum interference in a magnetic field is observed, which provides a way to broaden the application of Bi2O2Se nanowires.-
Keywords:
- Bi2O2Se nanowires /
- chemical vapor deposition /
- superconducting quantum interference devices
[1] Wu J X, Yuan H T, Meng M M, Chen C, Sun Y, Chen Z Y, Dang W H, Tan C W, Liu Y J, Yin J B, Zhou Y B, Huang S Y, Xu H Q, Cui Y, Hwang H Y, Liu Z F, Chen Y L, Yan B H, Peng H L 2017 Nat. Nanotechnol. 12 530
Google Scholar
[2] Wu J, Tan C, Tan Z, Liu Y, Yin J, Dang W, Wang M, Peng H 2017 Nano Lett. 17 3021
Google Scholar
[3] Zhao K, Liu H, Tan C, Xiao J, Shen J, Liu G, Peng H, Lu L, Qu F 2022 Appl. Phys. Lett. 121 212104
Google Scholar
[4] Wu J X, Liu Y J, Tan Z, Tan C, Yin J B, Li T, Tu T, Peng H 2017 Adv. Mater. 29 1704060
Google Scholar
[5] Meng M M, Huang S Y, Tan C, Wu J X, Jing Y, Peng H, Xu H Q 2018 Nanoscale 10 2704
Google Scholar
[6] Meng M M, Huang S Y, Tan C, Wu J X, Li X, Peng H, Xu H Q 2019 Nanoscale 11 10622
Google Scholar
[7] Li J, Wang Z, Wen Y, Chu J, Yin L, Cheng R, Lei L, He P, Jiang C, Feng L, He J 2018 Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 1706437
Google Scholar
[8] Xu S, Fu H, Tian Y, Deng T, Cai J, Wu J, Tu T, Li T, Tan C, Liang Y, Zhang C, Liu Z, Liu Z, Chen Y, Jiang Y, Yan B, Peng H 2020 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 17938
Google Scholar
[9] Hong C Y, Tao Y, Nie A M, Zhang M H, Wang N, Li R P, Huang J Q, Huang Y Q, Ren X M, Cheng Y C, Liu X L 2020 ACS Nano 14 16803
Google Scholar
[10] Song Y, Li Z, Li H, Tang S, Mu G, Xu L, Peng W, Shen D, Chen Y, Xie X, Jiang M 2020 Nanotechnology 31 165704
Google Scholar
[11] Ghosh T, Samanta M, Vasdev A, Dolui K, Ghatak J, Das T, Sheet G, Biswas K 2019 Nano Lett. 19 5703
Google Scholar
[12] Khan U, Luo Y, Tang L, Teng C, Liu J, Liu B, Cheng H M 2019 Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 1807979
Google Scholar
[13] Wu Z, Liu G L, Wang Y X, Yang X, Wei T Q, Wang Q J, Liang J, Xu N, Li Z Z, Zhu B, Qi H S, Deng Y, Zhu J 2019 Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 1906639
Google Scholar
[14] Liu S, Tan C, He D, Wang Y, Peng H, Zhao H 2020 Adv. Optical Mater. 8 1901567
Google Scholar
[15] Zou X, Sun Y, Wang C 2022 Small Methods 6 2200347
Google Scholar
[16] Khan U, Nairan A, Khan K, Li S, Liu B, Gao J 2022 Small 19 2206648
Google Scholar
[17] Khan U, Tang L, Ding B, Yuting L, Feng S, Chen W, Khan M J, Liu B, Cheng H M 2021 Adv. Funct. Mater. 31 2101170
Google Scholar
[18] Yu J, Sun Q 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 053901
Google Scholar
[19] Mao Q, Geng X, Yang J, Zhang J, Zhu S, Yu Q, Wang Y, Li H, Li R, Hao H 2018 J. Cryst. Growth. 498 244
Google Scholar
[20] Kim M, Park D, Kim J 2021 J. Alloy. Compd. 851 156905
Google Scholar
[21] Li J, Wang Z, Chu J, Cheng Z, He P, Wang J, Yin L, Cheng R, Li N, Wen Y, He J 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 114 151104
Google Scholar
[22] Bluhm H, Foletti S, Neder I, Rudner M, Mahalu D, Umansky V, Yacoby A 2010 Nat. Phys. 7 109
Google Scholar
[23] Quhe R, Liu J, Wu J, Yang J, Wang Y, Li Q, Li T, Guo Y, Yang J, Peng H, Lei M, Lu J 2019 Nanoscale 11 532
Google Scholar
[24] Yin J, Tan Z, Hong H, Wu J, Yuan H, Liu Y, Chen C, Tan C, Yao F, Li T, Chen Y, Liu Z, Liu K, Peng H 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 3311
Google Scholar
[25] Fan C, Dai B, Liang H, Xu X, Qi Z, Jiang H, Duan H, Zhang Q 2021 Adv. Funct. Mater. 31 2010263
Google Scholar
[26] Jiang K, Hu J 2022 Nat. Phys. 18 1145
Google Scholar
[27] Mayer W, Dartiailh M C, Yuan J, Wickramasinghe K S, Rossi E, Shabani J 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 212
Google Scholar
[28] Fukaya Y, Tanaka Y, Gentile P, Yada K, Cuoco M 2022 npj Quantum Mater. 7 99
Google Scholar
[29] Jiang D, Yu D Y, Zheng Z, Cao X C, Lin Q, Liu W M 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 160302
Google Scholar
[30] Frolov S M, Manfra M J, Sau J D 2020 Nat. Phys. 16 718
Google Scholar
[31] Breunig O, Ando Y 2021 Nat. Rev. Phys. 4 184
Google Scholar
[32] Matsuo S, Imoto T, Yokoyama T, Sato Y, Lindemann T, Gronin S, Gardner G C, Manfra M J, Tarucha S 2023 Nat. Phys. 19 1636
Google Scholar
[33] Mourik V, Zuo K, Frolov S M, Plissard S R, Bakkers E P A M, Kouwenhoven L P 2012 Science 336 1003
Google Scholar
[34] Dvir T, Wang G, van Loo N, Liu C X, Mazur G P, Bordin A, ten Haaf S L D, Wang J Y, van Driel D, Zatelli F, Li X, Malinowski F K, Gazibegovic S, Badawy G, Bakkers E P A M, Wimmer M, Kouwenhoven L P 2023 Nature 614 445
Google Scholar
[35] Deng M T, Vaitiekėnas S, Hansen E B, Danon J, Leijnse M, Flensberg K, Nygård J, Krogstrup P, Marcus C M 2016 Science 354 1557
Google Scholar
[36] Pal B, Chakraborty A, Sivakumar P K, Davydova M, Gopi A K, Pandeya A K, Krieger J A, Zhang Y, Date M, Ju S, Yuan N, Schröter N B M, Fu L, Parkin S S P 2022 Nat. Phys. 18 1228
Google Scholar
[37] Chen A Q, Park M J, Gill S T, Xiao Y R, Reigi-Plessis D, MacDougall G J, Gilbert M J, Mason N 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 3478
Google Scholar
-
图 1 (a)三温区管式炉的示意图, Bi2Se3粉末放置在温区A的中央, Bi2O3粉末放置在温区C的中央, 带有云母衬底的石英舟放置在管式炉的右边缘. (b), (c)带有云母衬底的石英舟的示意图和光学照片
Fig. 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the three-temperature-zone tubular furnace, with Bi2Se3 powder placed at the center of zone A and Bi2O3 powder at the center of zone C, a quartz boat with mica substrates is placed at the right edge of the quartz tube. (b), (c) Schematic diagram and optical photograph of a quartz boat with mica substrates, respectively.
图 2 不同水平位置的云母衬底生长的Bi2O2Se光学显微镜照片和SEM照片 (a), (c), (e)对应2号、4号和5号云母衬底生长Bi2O2Se后的光学显微镜照片; (b), (d), (f)对应2号、4号和5号云母衬底生长Bi2O2Se后的SEM照片
Fig. 2. Optical microscope photos and SEM photos of Bi2O2Se grown on mica substrates at different horizontal positions: (a), (c), (e) Optical microscope photos of Bi2O2Se grown on mica substrates at positions No.2, No.4 and No.5, respectively; (b), (d), (f) SEM photos of Bi2O2Se grown on mica substrates at positions No.2, No.4 and No.5, respectively.
图 3 不同竖直高度的云母衬底生长的Bi2O2Se纳米线的SEM照片 (a)—(c)石英衬底数量为1个、8个和13个
Fig. 3. SEM photos of Bi2O2Se nanowires grown on mica substrates of different vertical heights: (a)–(c) There are 1, 8 and 13 quartz substrates, respectively.
图 4 (a), (b) Bi2O2Se纳米线的AFM表征; (c) Bi2O2Se纳米线的EDS能谱; (d)使用Bi2O2Se纳米线制备的SQUID的SEM照片; (e) SQUID的dV/dI-Ib曲线; (d) SQUID干涉图案
Fig. 4. (a), (b) AFM characterization of Bi2O2Se nanowire; (c) EDS spectra of Bi2O2Se nanowire; (d) SEM images of SQUID device; (e) dV/dI-Ib curve of SQUID; (f) SQUID interference pattern.
表 1 Bi2O2Se纳米线的生长步骤
Table 1. Growth steps of Bi2O2Se nanowires.
步骤 第1步 第2步 第3步 第4步 温区A
(Bi2Se3)温度/℃ 室温—100 100—580 580 580—室温 时间/min 5 25 30 — 温区B 温度/℃ 室温—100 100—610 610 610—室温 时间/min 5 30 25 — 温区C
(Bi2O3)温度/℃ 室温—100 100—630 630 630—室温 时间/min 5 30 25 — 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Wu J X, Yuan H T, Meng M M, Chen C, Sun Y, Chen Z Y, Dang W H, Tan C W, Liu Y J, Yin J B, Zhou Y B, Huang S Y, Xu H Q, Cui Y, Hwang H Y, Liu Z F, Chen Y L, Yan B H, Peng H L 2017 Nat. Nanotechnol. 12 530
Google Scholar
[2] Wu J, Tan C, Tan Z, Liu Y, Yin J, Dang W, Wang M, Peng H 2017 Nano Lett. 17 3021
Google Scholar
[3] Zhao K, Liu H, Tan C, Xiao J, Shen J, Liu G, Peng H, Lu L, Qu F 2022 Appl. Phys. Lett. 121 212104
Google Scholar
[4] Wu J X, Liu Y J, Tan Z, Tan C, Yin J B, Li T, Tu T, Peng H 2017 Adv. Mater. 29 1704060
Google Scholar
[5] Meng M M, Huang S Y, Tan C, Wu J X, Jing Y, Peng H, Xu H Q 2018 Nanoscale 10 2704
Google Scholar
[6] Meng M M, Huang S Y, Tan C, Wu J X, Li X, Peng H, Xu H Q 2019 Nanoscale 11 10622
Google Scholar
[7] Li J, Wang Z, Wen Y, Chu J, Yin L, Cheng R, Lei L, He P, Jiang C, Feng L, He J 2018 Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 1706437
Google Scholar
[8] Xu S, Fu H, Tian Y, Deng T, Cai J, Wu J, Tu T, Li T, Tan C, Liang Y, Zhang C, Liu Z, Liu Z, Chen Y, Jiang Y, Yan B, Peng H 2020 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 17938
Google Scholar
[9] Hong C Y, Tao Y, Nie A M, Zhang M H, Wang N, Li R P, Huang J Q, Huang Y Q, Ren X M, Cheng Y C, Liu X L 2020 ACS Nano 14 16803
Google Scholar
[10] Song Y, Li Z, Li H, Tang S, Mu G, Xu L, Peng W, Shen D, Chen Y, Xie X, Jiang M 2020 Nanotechnology 31 165704
Google Scholar
[11] Ghosh T, Samanta M, Vasdev A, Dolui K, Ghatak J, Das T, Sheet G, Biswas K 2019 Nano Lett. 19 5703
Google Scholar
[12] Khan U, Luo Y, Tang L, Teng C, Liu J, Liu B, Cheng H M 2019 Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 1807979
Google Scholar
[13] Wu Z, Liu G L, Wang Y X, Yang X, Wei T Q, Wang Q J, Liang J, Xu N, Li Z Z, Zhu B, Qi H S, Deng Y, Zhu J 2019 Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 1906639
Google Scholar
[14] Liu S, Tan C, He D, Wang Y, Peng H, Zhao H 2020 Adv. Optical Mater. 8 1901567
Google Scholar
[15] Zou X, Sun Y, Wang C 2022 Small Methods 6 2200347
Google Scholar
[16] Khan U, Nairan A, Khan K, Li S, Liu B, Gao J 2022 Small 19 2206648
Google Scholar
[17] Khan U, Tang L, Ding B, Yuting L, Feng S, Chen W, Khan M J, Liu B, Cheng H M 2021 Adv. Funct. Mater. 31 2101170
Google Scholar
[18] Yu J, Sun Q 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 053901
Google Scholar
[19] Mao Q, Geng X, Yang J, Zhang J, Zhu S, Yu Q, Wang Y, Li H, Li R, Hao H 2018 J. Cryst. Growth. 498 244
Google Scholar
[20] Kim M, Park D, Kim J 2021 J. Alloy. Compd. 851 156905
Google Scholar
[21] Li J, Wang Z, Chu J, Cheng Z, He P, Wang J, Yin L, Cheng R, Li N, Wen Y, He J 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 114 151104
Google Scholar
[22] Bluhm H, Foletti S, Neder I, Rudner M, Mahalu D, Umansky V, Yacoby A 2010 Nat. Phys. 7 109
Google Scholar
[23] Quhe R, Liu J, Wu J, Yang J, Wang Y, Li Q, Li T, Guo Y, Yang J, Peng H, Lei M, Lu J 2019 Nanoscale 11 532
Google Scholar
[24] Yin J, Tan Z, Hong H, Wu J, Yuan H, Liu Y, Chen C, Tan C, Yao F, Li T, Chen Y, Liu Z, Liu K, Peng H 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 3311
Google Scholar
[25] Fan C, Dai B, Liang H, Xu X, Qi Z, Jiang H, Duan H, Zhang Q 2021 Adv. Funct. Mater. 31 2010263
Google Scholar
[26] Jiang K, Hu J 2022 Nat. Phys. 18 1145
Google Scholar
[27] Mayer W, Dartiailh M C, Yuan J, Wickramasinghe K S, Rossi E, Shabani J 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 212
Google Scholar
[28] Fukaya Y, Tanaka Y, Gentile P, Yada K, Cuoco M 2022 npj Quantum Mater. 7 99
Google Scholar
[29] Jiang D, Yu D Y, Zheng Z, Cao X C, Lin Q, Liu W M 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 160302
Google Scholar
[30] Frolov S M, Manfra M J, Sau J D 2020 Nat. Phys. 16 718
Google Scholar
[31] Breunig O, Ando Y 2021 Nat. Rev. Phys. 4 184
Google Scholar
[32] Matsuo S, Imoto T, Yokoyama T, Sato Y, Lindemann T, Gronin S, Gardner G C, Manfra M J, Tarucha S 2023 Nat. Phys. 19 1636
Google Scholar
[33] Mourik V, Zuo K, Frolov S M, Plissard S R, Bakkers E P A M, Kouwenhoven L P 2012 Science 336 1003
Google Scholar
[34] Dvir T, Wang G, van Loo N, Liu C X, Mazur G P, Bordin A, ten Haaf S L D, Wang J Y, van Driel D, Zatelli F, Li X, Malinowski F K, Gazibegovic S, Badawy G, Bakkers E P A M, Wimmer M, Kouwenhoven L P 2023 Nature 614 445
Google Scholar
[35] Deng M T, Vaitiekėnas S, Hansen E B, Danon J, Leijnse M, Flensberg K, Nygård J, Krogstrup P, Marcus C M 2016 Science 354 1557
Google Scholar
[36] Pal B, Chakraborty A, Sivakumar P K, Davydova M, Gopi A K, Pandeya A K, Krieger J A, Zhang Y, Date M, Ju S, Yuan N, Schröter N B M, Fu L, Parkin S S P 2022 Nat. Phys. 18 1228
Google Scholar
[37] Chen A Q, Park M J, Gill S T, Xiao Y R, Reigi-Plessis D, MacDougall G J, Gilbert M J, Mason N 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 3478
Google Scholar
-
[1] 傅群东, 王小伟, 周修贤, 朱超, 刘政. 硅基底上二维硒氧化铋的化学气相沉积法合成及其光电探测应用. 物理学报, 2022, 71(16): 166101. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220388 [2] 费翔, 张秀梅, 付泉桂, 蔡正阳, 南海燕, 顾晓峰, 肖少庆. 基于熔融玻璃的预沉积法生长毫米级单晶MoS2及WS2-MoS2异质结. 物理学报, 2022, 71(4): 048101. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211735 [3] 王宏章, 李宇龙, 徐铁权, 朱子青, 马平, 王越, 甘子钊. MgO衬底上YBa2Cu3O7– $_{ \delta}$ 台阶边沿型约瑟夫森结的制备及特性. 物理学报, 2021, 70(3): 037401. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201291[4] 王晓愚, 毕卫红, 崔永兆, 付广伟, 付兴虎, 金娃, 王颖. 基于化学气相沉积方法的石墨烯-光子晶体光纤的制备研究. 物理学报, 2020, 69(19): 194202. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200750 [5] 李丹阳, 韩旭, 徐光远, 刘筱, 赵枭钧, 李庚伟, 郝会颖, 董敬敬, 刘昊, 邢杰. 低功耗、高灵敏的Bi2O2Se光电导探测器. 物理学报, 2020, 69(24): 248502. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201044 [6] 冯秋菊, 石博, 李昀铮, 王德煜, 高冲, 董增杰, 解金珠, 梁红伟. 单根Sb掺杂ZnO微米线非平衡电桥式气敏传感器的制作与性能. 物理学报, 2020, 69(3): 038102. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191530 [7] 张晓波, 青芳竹, 李雪松. 化学气相沉积石墨烯薄膜的洁净转移. 物理学报, 2019, 68(9): 096801. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190279 [8] 冯秋菊, 李芳, 李彤彤, 李昀铮, 石博, 李梦轲, 梁红伟. 外电场辅助化学气相沉积方法制备网格状β-Ga2O3纳米线及其特性研究. 物理学报, 2018, 67(21): 218101. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180805 [9] 董艳芳, 何大伟, 王永生, 许海腾, 巩哲. 一种简单的化学气相沉积法制备大尺寸单层二硫化钼. 物理学报, 2016, 65(12): 128101. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.128101 [10] 王彬, 冯雅辉, 王秋实, 张伟, 张丽娜, 马晋文, 张浩然, 于广辉, 王桂强. 化学气相沉积法制备的石墨烯晶畴的氢气刻蚀. 物理学报, 2016, 65(9): 098101. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.098101 [11] 马立安, 郑永安, 魏朝晖, 胡利勤, 郭太良. 合成温度和N2/O2流量比对碳纤维衬底上生长的SnO2纳米线形貌及场发射性能影响. 物理学报, 2015, 64(23): 237901. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.237901 [12] 王浪, 冯伟, 杨连乔, 张建华. 化学气相沉积法制备石墨烯的铜衬底预处理研究. 物理学报, 2014, 63(17): 176801. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.176801 [13] 冯秋菊, 许瑞卓, 郭慧颖, 徐坤, 李荣, 陶鹏程, 梁红伟, 刘佳媛, 梅艺赢. 衬底位置对化学气相沉积法制备的磷掺杂p型ZnO纳米材料形貌和特性的影响. 物理学报, 2014, 63(16): 168101. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.168101 [14] 王文荣, 周玉修, 李铁, 王跃林, 谢晓明. 高质量大面积石墨烯的化学气相沉积制备方法研究. 物理学报, 2012, 61(3): 038702. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.038702 [15] 韩道丽, 赵元黎, 赵海波, 宋天福, 梁二军. 化学气相沉积法制备定向碳纳米管阵列. 物理学报, 2007, 56(10): 5958-5964. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.5958 [16] 郭平生, 陈 婷, 曹章轶, 张哲娟, 陈奕卫, 孙 卓. 场致发射阴极碳纳米管的热化学气相沉积法低温生长. 物理学报, 2007, 56(11): 6705-6711. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.6705 [17] 曾湘波, 廖显伯, 王 博, 刁宏伟, 戴松涛, 向贤碧, 常秀兰, 徐艳月, 胡志华, 郝会颖, 孔光临. 等离子体增强化学气相沉积法实现硅纳米线掺硼. 物理学报, 2004, 53(12): 4410-4413. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.4410 [18] 闫小琴, 刘祖琴, 唐东升, 慈立杰, 刘东方, 周振平, 梁迎新, 袁华军, 周维亚, 王 刚. 衬底对化学气相沉积法制备氧化硅纳米线的影响. 物理学报, 2003, 52(2): 454-458. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.454 [19] 闫桂沈, 李贺军, 郝志彪. 热解碳化学气相沉积中的多重定态和非平衡相变的研究. 物理学报, 2002, 51(2): 326-331. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.326 [20] 陈小华, 吴国涛, 邓福铭, 王健雄, 杨杭生, 王淼, 卢筱楠, 彭景翠, 李文铸. 射频等离子体辅助化学气相沉积方法生长碳纳米洋葱. 物理学报, 2001, 50(7): 1264-1267. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.1264
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 860
- PDF下载量: 76
- 被引次数: 0
