搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

一种径向基函数虚拟网格法数值模拟复杂边界流动

辛建建 石伏龙 金秋

引用本文:
Citation:

一种径向基函数虚拟网格法数值模拟复杂边界流动

辛建建, 石伏龙, 金秋

Numerical simulation of complex immersed boundary flow by a radial basis function ghost cell method

Xin Jian-Jian, Shi Fu-Long, Jin Qiu
PDF
导出引用
  • 提出了一种径向基函数虚拟网格法浸入边界法以模拟复杂或多体浸入边界黏性绕流问题.在该方法中,采用有限差分法离散固定笛卡尔交错网格上的不可压缩Navier-Stokes方程,以分步法结合三阶Runge-Kutta格式进行时间积分,高阶TVDMUSCL(total variation diminishing monotonic upstream-centered scheme for conservation laws)格式离散对流项;一个边界连续的虚拟网格法施加物面边界条件以考虑尖锐边界对流场的影响;引入具多项式基的径向基函数描述和重构任意复杂浸入界面,并识别背景网格属性状态.采用Fortran 90语言开发相应的求解器,模拟了绕圆柱、机翼和交错布置圆柱群的黏性绕流问题,验证了本文方法的正确性、可靠性和对复杂边界流动问题的适用性.
    A radial basis function ghost cell immersed boundary method of simulating flows around arbitrary complex or multiple immersed boundaries is proposed in this paper. In this method, incompressible Navier-Stokes equations are discretized on fixed Cartesian staggered gridby the finite difference method. A fractional step method is used for time integration, together with third order Runge-Kutta scheme. A high-order TVD MUSCL (total variation diminishing monotonic upstream-centered scheme for conservation law) scheme is used to discretize convective terms. Two salient features are emphasized in the present study. First, boundary conditions at the immersed interface are enforced by a continuous ghost cell method to consider the influence of immersed boundary on the flow field. The immersed bodies are treated as virtual boundaries immersed in the flow. And Navier-Stokes equations are solved in the entire computation domain, including solid domain. Therefore, programming complexity is greatly reduced and the treatment of immersed boundaries is simplified. Second, a polynomial and radial basis function is introduced to implicitly represent and reconstruct arbitrary complex immersed boundaries. Iso-surface distance functions about interface geometries are fitted with some sampling points of body surfaces. It is flexible and robust. Moreover, the information about interface positions on the background grid can be easily identified by the signed distance functions. Based on our in-house developed immersed boundary method solver, typical test cases are simulated to validate the proposed method. The flows around a cylinder at Reynolds numbers of 40, 100 and 200 are first simulated and a grid resolution study is carried out. Good agreement is achieved by comparing with previous numerical results, which shows that this method is accurate and reliable. In the second case of flow around airfoil, the good agreement with previous study shows that the present method has the ability to simulate complex immersed boundary flow. In the last case of flow around array of thirteen cylinders, the ability of present method for multiple immersed boundaries is well proved. And hydrodynamic interaction among multiple bodies is briefly analyzed.
      Corresponding author: Xin Jian-Jian, xinjinjin1990@sina.com
    [1]

    Li Q, Li W M 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 064601 (in Chinese)[李强, 李五明 2016 物理学报 65 064601]

    [2]

    Sotiropoulos F, Yang X 2014 Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 65 1

    [3]

    Lee J, You D 2013 J. Comput. Phys. 233 295

    [4]

    Dechristé D, Mieussens L 2015 J. Comput. Phys. 314 465

    [5]

    Yang J, Stern F 2012 J. Comput. Phys. 231 5029

    [6]

    Majumdar S, Iaccarino G, Durbin P 2001 Annual Research Briefs 30 353

    [7]

    Tseng Y H, Ferziger J H 2003 J. Comput. Phys. 192 593

    [8]

    Xia J, Luo K, Fan J 2015 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 89 856

    [9]

    Yang Q, Cao S Y, Liu S Y 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 214702 (in Chinese)[杨青, 曹曙阳, 刘十一 2014 物理学报 63 214702]

    [10]

    Monasse L, Daru V, Mariotti C, Piperno S, Tenaud C 2012 J. Comput. Phys. 231 2977

    [11]

    Schneiders L, Günther C, Meinke M, Schröder W 2016 J. Comput. Phys. 311 62

    [12]

    Ghias R, Mittal R, Dong H 2007 J. Comput. Phys. 225 528

    [13]

    Berthelsen P A, Faltinsen O M 2008 J. Comput. Phys. 227 4354

    [14]

    Xia J, Luo K, Fan J 2014 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 75 302

    [15]

    Mittal R, Dong H, Bozkurttas M, Najjar F M, Vargas A, von Loebbecke A 2008 J. Comput. Phys. 227 4825

    [16]

    Hu O, Zhao N, Lin J M, Wang D H 2011 Acta Aerodyn. Sin. 29 491 (in Chinese)[胡偶, 赵宁, 刘剑明, 王东红 2011 空气动力学学报 29 491]

    [17]

    Zhang X, Liu Y, Ma S 2009 Adv. Mech. 39 1 (in Chinese)[张雄, 刘岩, 马上 2009 力学进展 39 1]

    [18]

    Versteeg H K, Malalasekera W 2000 An Introduction to Computational Fluiddynamics:the Finite Volume Method (Second edition) (Beijing:World Book Inc) p24

    [19]

    Lee J, Kim J, Choi H, Yang K S 2011 J. Comput. Phys. 230 2677

    [20]

    Shin B R 2000 European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, Barcelona, Spain, September 2-6, 2000 p1

    [21]

    Kershaw D S 1978 J. Comput. Phys. 26 1

    [22]

    Pan D, Shen T T 2009 Int. J. Numer. Method Fluid 60 1378

    [23]

    Rendall T C S, Allen C B 2007 Int. J. Numer. Method Eng. 74 10

    [24]

    Ye J J, Li T Q 2013 Proceedings of National Congress on Hydrodynamics Zhoushan, China, September 20-25, 2013 p343 (in Chinese)[叶俊杰, 李廷秋 2013 全国水动力学学术会议 舟山, 中国, 2013年9月20-25日 第343 页]

    [25]

    Frisani A, Hassan Y A 2015 Comput. Fluids 121 51

    [26]

    Imamura T, Suzuki K, Nakamura T, Yoshida Masahiro 2005 J. Comput. Phys. 202 645

    [27]

    Li Q 2010 M. S. Thesis (Nanjing:Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics) (in Chinese)[李秋2010 硕士学位论文(南京:南京航空航天大学)]

    [28]

    Gao T, Tseng Y H, Lu X Y 2007 Int. J. Numer. Method Fluid 55 1189

  • [1]

    Li Q, Li W M 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 064601 (in Chinese)[李强, 李五明 2016 物理学报 65 064601]

    [2]

    Sotiropoulos F, Yang X 2014 Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 65 1

    [3]

    Lee J, You D 2013 J. Comput. Phys. 233 295

    [4]

    Dechristé D, Mieussens L 2015 J. Comput. Phys. 314 465

    [5]

    Yang J, Stern F 2012 J. Comput. Phys. 231 5029

    [6]

    Majumdar S, Iaccarino G, Durbin P 2001 Annual Research Briefs 30 353

    [7]

    Tseng Y H, Ferziger J H 2003 J. Comput. Phys. 192 593

    [8]

    Xia J, Luo K, Fan J 2015 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 89 856

    [9]

    Yang Q, Cao S Y, Liu S Y 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 214702 (in Chinese)[杨青, 曹曙阳, 刘十一 2014 物理学报 63 214702]

    [10]

    Monasse L, Daru V, Mariotti C, Piperno S, Tenaud C 2012 J. Comput. Phys. 231 2977

    [11]

    Schneiders L, Günther C, Meinke M, Schröder W 2016 J. Comput. Phys. 311 62

    [12]

    Ghias R, Mittal R, Dong H 2007 J. Comput. Phys. 225 528

    [13]

    Berthelsen P A, Faltinsen O M 2008 J. Comput. Phys. 227 4354

    [14]

    Xia J, Luo K, Fan J 2014 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 75 302

    [15]

    Mittal R, Dong H, Bozkurttas M, Najjar F M, Vargas A, von Loebbecke A 2008 J. Comput. Phys. 227 4825

    [16]

    Hu O, Zhao N, Lin J M, Wang D H 2011 Acta Aerodyn. Sin. 29 491 (in Chinese)[胡偶, 赵宁, 刘剑明, 王东红 2011 空气动力学学报 29 491]

    [17]

    Zhang X, Liu Y, Ma S 2009 Adv. Mech. 39 1 (in Chinese)[张雄, 刘岩, 马上 2009 力学进展 39 1]

    [18]

    Versteeg H K, Malalasekera W 2000 An Introduction to Computational Fluiddynamics:the Finite Volume Method (Second edition) (Beijing:World Book Inc) p24

    [19]

    Lee J, Kim J, Choi H, Yang K S 2011 J. Comput. Phys. 230 2677

    [20]

    Shin B R 2000 European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, Barcelona, Spain, September 2-6, 2000 p1

    [21]

    Kershaw D S 1978 J. Comput. Phys. 26 1

    [22]

    Pan D, Shen T T 2009 Int. J. Numer. Method Fluid 60 1378

    [23]

    Rendall T C S, Allen C B 2007 Int. J. Numer. Method Eng. 74 10

    [24]

    Ye J J, Li T Q 2013 Proceedings of National Congress on Hydrodynamics Zhoushan, China, September 20-25, 2013 p343 (in Chinese)[叶俊杰, 李廷秋 2013 全国水动力学学术会议 舟山, 中国, 2013年9月20-25日 第343 页]

    [25]

    Frisani A, Hassan Y A 2015 Comput. Fluids 121 51

    [26]

    Imamura T, Suzuki K, Nakamura T, Yoshida Masahiro 2005 J. Comput. Phys. 202 645

    [27]

    Li Q 2010 M. S. Thesis (Nanjing:Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics) (in Chinese)[李秋2010 硕士学位论文(南京:南京航空航天大学)]

    [28]

    Gao T, Tseng Y H, Lu X Y 2007 Int. J. Numer. Method Fluid 55 1189

  • [1] 任金莲, 蒋戎戎, 陆伟刚, 蒋涛. 基于局部加密纯无网格法非线性Cahn-Hilliard方程的模拟. 物理学报, 2020, 69(8): 080202. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191829
    [2] 辛建建, 陈振雷, 石凡, 石伏龙. 基于直角网格法的单个和阵列布置下柔性水翼绕流数值模拟. 物理学报, 2020, 69(4): 044702. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191711
    [3] 林晨森, 陈硕, 肖兰兰. 适用复杂几何壁面的耗散粒子动力学边界条件. 物理学报, 2019, 68(14): 140204. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190533
    [4] 魏峰, 金亮, 柳军, 丁峰, 郑新萍. 基于一种改进的虚拟单元法模拟包含静止/运动边界的流动问题. 物理学报, 2019, 68(12): 124703. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190013
    [5] 张妮, 刘丁, 冯雪亮. 直拉硅单晶生长过程中工艺参数对相变界面形态的影响. 物理学报, 2018, 67(21): 218701. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180305
    [6] 吴晓笛, 刘华坪, 陈浮. 基于浸入边界-多松弛时间格子玻尔兹曼通量求解法的流固耦合算法研究. 物理学报, 2017, 66(22): 224702. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.224702
    [7] 冯德山, 杨道学, 王珣. 插值小波尺度法探地雷达数值模拟及四阶Runge Kutta辅助微分方程吸收边界条件. 物理学报, 2016, 65(23): 234102. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.234102
    [8] 李强, 李五明. 带嵌件型腔内熔接过程的数值模拟研究. 物理学报, 2016, 65(6): 064601. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.064601
    [9] 杨青, 曹曙阳, 刘十一. 基于浸入式边界方法的串联双矩形柱绕流数值模拟. 物理学报, 2014, 63(21): 214702. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.214702
    [10] 史冬岩, 王志凯, 张阿漫. 任意复杂流-固边界的格子Boltzmann处理方法. 物理学报, 2014, 63(7): 074703. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.074703
    [11] 刘飞飞, 魏守水, 魏长智, 任晓飞. 基于速度源修正的浸入边界-晶格玻尔兹曼法研究仿生微流体驱动模型. 物理学报, 2014, 63(19): 194704. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.194704
    [12] 刘云龙, 张阿漫, 王诗平, 田昭丽. 基于边界元法的近平板圆孔气泡动力学行为研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(14): 144703. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.144703
    [13] 许军, 谢文浩, 邓勇, 王侃, 罗召洋, 龚辉. 快速多极边界元法用于扩散光学断层成像研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(10): 104204. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.104204
    [14] 刘云龙, 张阿漫, 王诗平, 田昭丽. 基于边界元法的气泡同波浪相互作用研究. 物理学报, 2012, 61(22): 224702. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.224702
    [15] 李善德, 黄其柏, 李天匀. 新的对角形式快速多极边界元法求解声学Helmholtz方程. 物理学报, 2012, 61(6): 064301. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.064301
    [16] 戴保东, 程玉民. 势问题的径向基函数——局部边界积分方程方法. 物理学报, 2007, 56(2): 597-603. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.597
    [17] 秦义校, 程玉民. 弹性力学的重构核粒子边界无单元法. 物理学报, 2006, 55(7): 3215-3222. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.3215
    [18] 司马文霞, 刘 凡, 孙才新, 廖瑞金, 杨 庆. 基于改进的径向基函数神经网络的铁磁谐振系统混沌控制. 物理学报, 2006, 55(11): 5714-5720. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.5714
    [19] 王延申. 开边界六顶角模型的边界关联函数. 物理学报, 2003, 52(11): 2700-2705. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.2700
    [20] 张钟华. 变动边界微扰法及其对精密电容器误差计算的应用. 物理学报, 1979, 28(4): 563-570. doi: 10.7498/aps.28.563
计量
  • 文章访问数:  5224
  • PDF下载量:  350
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2016-08-07
  • 修回日期:  2016-11-25
  • 刊出日期:  2017-02-05

/

返回文章
返回