-
按照基于自旋密度泛函理论的赝势平面波第一原理计算方法, 理论研究了两种层堆叠结构氧化钼(正交和单斜MoO3)的电子结构、磁性和光学特性, 探讨其作为电致变色材料或电磁材料在光电子器件中的技术应用. 采用先进的半局域GGA-PW91和非局域HSE06交换相关泛函精确计算晶体结构和带隙宽度. 计算得出较低密排面解离能, 表明两种层状氧化钼的单片层很容易从体材料上剥落. 能带结构和投影态密度分析表明: 导带底和价带顶电子态主要来自于层平面方向成键的原子轨道, 呈现典型的二维电子结构特征. 无缺陷的MoO3块体材料具有明显的磁矩, O空位会导致磁矩增加; 由Mo原子和顶点氧原子产生的亚铁磁耦合磁矩是MoO3层状材料磁性的主要来源; 层状氧化钼在可见光区具有明显的光吸收响应, 光吸收谱表现出显著的各向异性并在带电时发生明显的蓝移或形成新的低频可见光吸收峰. 计算结果证明层状氧化钼具有明显的电致变色和磁控性能, 为设计高性能电磁或光电子功能材料提供了理论依据和技术数据.According to the pseudopotential plane-wave method of first-principles calculation based on the spin density functional theory, the electronic structure, magnetic and optical properties of laminated molybdenum oxides (orthonormal and monoclinic MoO3) are studied theoretically. The interlaminar dissociation energy, band-structure, spin polarization, dielectric function, and the optical absorption/reflectivity in a charged state are systematically calculated to explore the potential technology applications of laminated MoO3 as electrochromic or electromagnetic materials in optoelectronic devices. The semilocal GGA-PW91 and nonlocal HSE06 exchange-correlation functional are employed to obtain the more accurate crystal structure and band gap respectively. The cleavage energy results indicate that the single layers can easily flake off from the bulk material of these molybdenum oxides. The band structure and atomic-projected density of states prove that the conduction band minimum and valence band maximum are mainly derived from the atom-orbitals bonding oriented in layer-plane, representing characteristic two-dimensional electronic structure. The spin polarized calculations imply that the evident magnetic-moment will engender in MoO6 octahedron layers of the perfect MoO3 due to the substantial spin polarization of Mo and vertex O atoms which are ferromagnetic-coupling to produce significant net magnetic moments, essentially accounting for the magnetic source of bulk MoO3. The Mo vacancy reduces the electronic density of states derived from the spin polarized d-orbitals, leading the net magnetic moment to decrease, while the OI vacancy can reduce the density of spin-down states in the MoO3, resulting in the significant improvement of net magnetic moment. The existence of OII vacancy leads to the energetic spin-splitting of O-2p and Mo-4d orbital states, and thus increasing net magnetic moment by raising the electronic density of polarized spin-up states. The electron spin polarization of Mo-4d orbital component dominantly contributes to the bulk magnetism. The laminated MoO3 presents a significant optical response in the visible region with obvious anisotropy of optical absorption spectra, which will represent a considerable blue shift or new low-frequency absorption peaks for visible light when loading charges. The calculation results demonstrate that the laminated molybdenum oxides have evident electrochromic property with controllable magnetic moment, which provides theoretical basis and technical data for developing novel functional materials with high performance to be used in electromagnetic or optoelectronic devices.
-
Keywords:
- laminated molybdenum oxide /
- first-principles calculation /
- electronic structure /
- electrochromic material
[1] Novoselov K S, Mishchenko A, Carvalho A, Castro Neto A H 2016 Science 353 aac9439Google Scholar
[2] Lin S Y, Wang C M, Kao K S, Chen Y C, Liu C C 2010 J. Sol-Gel Sci. Techn. 53 51Google Scholar
[3] Rahmani M, Keshmiri S, Yu J, Sadek A, Al-Mashat L, Moafi A, Latham K, Li Y, Wlodarski W, Kalantar-zadeh K 2010 Actuat. B: Chem. 145 13Google Scholar
[4] Chen Y, Lu C, Xu L, Ma Y, Hou W, Zhu J J 2010 Cryst. Eng. Commun. 12 3740Google Scholar
[5] Huang L, Xu H, Zhang R, Cheng X, Xia J, Xu Y, Li H 2013 Appl. Surf. Sci. 283 25Google Scholar
[6] Kumar V, Sumboja A, Wang J, Bhavanasi V, Nguyen V C, Lee P S 2014 Chem. Mater. 26 5533Google Scholar
[7] Sreedhara M, Matte H, Govindaraj A, Rao C 2013 Chem. Asian J. 8 2430Google Scholar
[8] Balendhran S, Deng J, Ou J Z, Walia S, Scott J, Tang J, Wang K L, Field M R, Russo S, Zhuiykov S, Strano M S, Medhekar N, Sriram S, Bhaskaran M, Kalantar-zadeh K 2013 Adv. Mater. 25 109Google Scholar
[9] Zhou G, Xu X, Yu J, Feng B, Zhang Y, Hu J, Zhou Y 2014 Cryst. Eng. Commun. 16 9025Google Scholar
[10] Liu D, Lei W W, Hao J, Liu D D, Liu B B, Wang X, Chen X H, Cui Q L, Zou G T, Liu J, Jiang S 2009 J. Appl. Phys. 105 023513Google Scholar
[11] Baker B, Feist T P, Mccarron E M 1995 J. Solid State Chem. 119 199Google Scholar
[12] Wang F, Pang Z, Lin L, Fang S, Dai Y, Han S 2009 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 321 3067Google Scholar
[13] Peng H, Li J, Li S S, Xia J B 2009 Phys. Rev. B 79 092411Google Scholar
[14] Han X, Lee J, Yoo H I 2009 Phys. Rev. B 79 100403(R)Google Scholar
[15] Venkatesan M, Fitzgerald C B, Coey J M D 2004 Nature 430 630Google Scholar
[16] Gacic M, Jakob G, Herbort C, Adrian H, Tietze T, Brück S, Goering E 2007 Phys. Rev. B 75 205206Google Scholar
[17] Hu J, Zhang Z, Zhao M, Qin H, Jiang M 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 93 192503Google Scholar
[18] Sundaresan A, Bhargavi R, Rangarajan N, Siddesh U, Rao C N R 2006 Phys. Rev. B 74 161306(R)Google Scholar
[19] Zuo X, Yoon S D, Yang A, Duan W H, Vittoria C, Harris V G 2009 J. Appl. Phys. 105 07C508Google Scholar
[20] Rahman G, García-Suárez V M, Hong S C 2008 Phys. Rev. B 78 184404Google Scholar
[21] Wang F, Pang Z, Lin L, Fang S, Dai Y, Han S 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 144424Google Scholar
[22] Peng H, Xiang H J, Wei S H, Li S S, Xia J B, Li J 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 017201Google Scholar
[23] Thakur P, Cezar J C, Brookes N B, Choudhary R J, Prakash R, Phase D M, Chae K H, Kumar R 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 062501Google Scholar
[24] Okumu J, Koerfer F, Salinga C, Wutting M 2004 J. Appl. Phys. 95 7632Google Scholar
[25] Wang F, Pang Z, Lin L, Fang S, Dai Y, Han S 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 134407Google Scholar
[26] Ding H, Ray K G, Ozolins V, Asta M 2012 Phys. Rev. B 85 012104
[27] Peelaers H, Van de Walle C G 2014 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 26 305502Google Scholar
[28] Ding H, Lin H, Sadigh B, Zhou F, Ozolinš V, Asta M 2014 J. Phys. Chem. C 118 15565Google Scholar
[29] Kröger M, Hamwi S, Meyer J, Riedl T, Kowalsky W, Kahn A 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 123301Google Scholar
[30] Becke A D 1993 J. Chem. Phys. 98 5648Google Scholar
[31] Perdew J P, Chevary J A, Vosko S H, Jackson K A, Pederson M R, Singh D J, Fiolhais C 1992 Phys. Rev. B 46 6671Google Scholar
[32] Tkatchenko A, Scheffler M 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 073005Google Scholar
[33] Krukau A V, Vydrov O A, Izmaylov A F, Scuseria G E 2006 J. Chem. Phys. 125 224106Google Scholar
[34] Cococcioni M, Gironcoli S 2005 Phys. Rev. B 71 035105Google Scholar
[35] Kress G, Joubert D 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 1758
[36] Milman V, Lee M H, Payne M C 1994 Phys. Rev. B 49 16300Google Scholar
[37] Payne M C, Teter M P, Allan D C, Arias T A, Joannopoulos J D 1992 Rev. Mod. Phys. 64 1045Google Scholar
[38] Marzari N, Vanderbilt D, Payne M C 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 1337Google Scholar
[39] Chantis A N, Christensen N E, Svane A, Cardona M 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 205205Google Scholar
[40] Pfrommer B G, Cote M, Louie S G, Cohen M L 1997 J. Comput. Phys. 131 233Google Scholar
[41] Segall M D, Shah R, Pickard C J, Payne M C 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 16317Google Scholar
[42] Negishi H, Negishi S, Kuroiwa Y, Sato N, Aoyagi S 2004 Phys. Rev. B 69 064111Google Scholar
[43] Kalantar-zadeh K, Tang J, Wang M, Wang K L, Shailos A, Galatsis K, Kojima R, Strong V, Lech A, Wlodarski W, Kaner R B 2010 Nanoscale 2 429Google Scholar
[44] Dandogbessi B S, Akin-Ojo O 2016 J. Appl. Phys. 120 055105Google Scholar
[45] Zhong M Z, Zhou K, Wei Z M, Li Y, Li T, Dong H L, Jiang L, Li J B, Hu W P 2018 2D Mater. 5 035033Google Scholar
-
图 3 用PW91泛函(左图)和HSE06泛函(右图)计算的(a)
$\alpha $ -MoO3和(b) MoO3-Ⅱ能带结构, 费米能级作为能量参考零点(水平虚线)Fig. 3. Band structures of (a)
$\alpha $ -MoO3 and (b) MoO3-Ⅱ calculated by PW91 functional (left panels) and HSE06 functional (right panels), with the Fermi energy level being set as reference energy zero (horizontal dot line).图 5 (a)
$\alpha $ -MoO3和(b) MoO3 -Ⅱ PDOS的轨道成分: Mo原子的4d轨道成分(上图)和三种等价氧原子OⅠ, OⅡ和OⅢ的2p轨道成分(下图)Fig. 5. Partial orbital components of atomic projected density of states for (a)
$\alpha $ -MoO3 and (b) MoO3 -Ⅱ: Mo-4d orbital (above panels) and O-2p orbital (below panels) of three equivalent oxygens OⅠ, OⅡ and OⅢ.图 6
$\alpha $ -MoO3(左图)和MoO3-Ⅱ(右图)的(a)自旋分布的等密度面空间分布, 自旋密度等值面密度为0.05 electrons/Å3; (b) Mo-4d和O-2p的部分DOS(上旋态$\alpha $ 和下旋态$\beta $ ), 费米能量为能量参考零点(垂直虚线)Fig. 6. (a) The spin distribution representing as spin densityisosurface contoured at 0.05 electrons/Å3 and (b) the spin-resolved partial DOS of Mo-4d and O-2p with Fermi energy being referenced as energy zero indicated by vertical dashed line, for
$\alpha $ -MoO3 (left panels) and MoO3-Ⅱ (right panels).图 7 含有6% Mo空位、OⅠ空位、OⅡ空位和OⅢ空位的 (a)
$\alpha $ -MoO3和 (b) MoO3 -II缺陷晶体的Mo-4d和O-2p的部分DOS (上旋态$\alpha $ 和下旋态$\beta $ ), 费米能量为能量参考零点(垂直虚线)Fig. 7. The spin-resolved partial DOS of Mo-4d and O-2p for (a)
$\alpha $ -MoO3 and (b) MoO3 -Ⅱ crystals with 6% Mo, OⅠ, OⅡ and OⅢ vacancies respectively. The Fermi energy is referenced as energy zero indicated by vertical dashed line.图 8
$\alpha $ -MoO3(左图)和MoO3-Ⅱ(右图)含有6% OⅠ(上图)和OⅡ(下图)空位的自旋密度等值面, 等值面的密度为0.05 electrons /Å3Fig. 8. The isosurface of spin density of
$\alpha $ -MoO3 (left images) and MoO3-Ⅱ (right images) with 6% OⅠ (above images) and OⅡ (below images) vacancies respectively. The isosurfaces are contoured at 0.05 electrons/Å3.图 10 (a)
$\alpha $ -MoO3和(b) MoO3-Ⅱ在不同带电(–2e—+2e/单胞)状态下的光吸收谱, 入射非偏振光分别沿着原子层平面的垂直(左图)和平行(右图)方向入射Fig. 10. The calculatedabsorption spectra of (a)
$\alpha $ -MoO3 and (b) MoO3-Ⅱ with the light incident along the directions perpendicular (left panels) and parallel (right panels) to atomic-layer plane respectively, under different charge loading (–2e—+2e per unit cell).表 1
$\alpha $ -MoO3和MoO3-Ⅱ的晶格参数Table 1. Crystal parameters of
$\alpha $ -MoO3 and MoO3-Ⅱ.晶体结构 $\alpha $-MoO3 MoO3-Ⅱ 对称空间群 Pnma ($\alpha $ = $\beta $ = $\gamma $ = 90°) P21/m ($\alpha $ = $\gamma $ = 90°) 晶格
参数PBE a = 14.668 Å, b = 3.858 Å, c = 3.965 Å a = 3.783 Å, b = 3.739 Å, c = 8.067 Å, $\beta $ = 100.979° PBE + DFT-D/TS a = 13.012 Å, b = 3.812 Å, c = 3.876 Å a = 3.882 Å, b = 3.812 Å, c = 7.544 Å, $\beta $ = 104.879° PW91 a = 13.213 Å, b = 3.856 Å, c = 3.990 Å a = 3.809 Å, b = 3.743 Å, c = 7.863 Å, $\beta $ = 101.098° PW91 + DFT-D/OBS a = 13.484 Å, b = 3.866 Å, c = 3.964 Å a = 3.909 Å, b = 3.820 Å, c = 7.293 Å, $\beta $ = 104.263° 实验[41,42] a = 13.350 Å, b = 3.703 Å, c = 3.918 Å a = 3.954 Å, b = 3.687 Å, c = 7.095 Å, $\beta $ = 103.745° 表 2
$\alpha $ -MoO3和MoO3 -Ⅱ光学能带带隙的计算值和文献报道实验数据Table 2. The calculated optical band-gaps of
$\alpha $ -MoO3 and MoO3 -Ⅱ in comparison with reported experimental data.带隙/eV $\alpha $-MoO3 MoO3 -Ⅱ PW91/LDA + U 上旋态 1.38 2.99 下旋态 1.64 2.01 HSE06 上旋态 2.85 2.92 下旋态 2.14 2.12 实验值[29] 3.0 — 表 3 用PW91梯度校正泛函和HSE06杂化泛函计算的两种层堆叠钼氧化物的EA和电IP, 最后一行中列出文献[29]中
$\alpha $ -MoO3的实验结果Table 3. The calculated electron affinity (EA) and ionization potential (IP) of two laminated molybdenum oxides employing PW91 and HSE06 functionals respectively. The experimental results of
$\alpha $ -MoO3 from Ref. [29] are also listed for comparison.$\alpha $-MoO3 MoO3 -Ⅱ EA/eV IP/eV EA/eV IP/eV 计算 PW91 6.555 7.94 6.11 8.12 HSE06 6.615 8.76 6.17 8.29 实验 6.700 9.68 — — 表 4 不同点空位类型MoO3晶体的总自旋值(每个单胞), 点空位浓度为6%
Table 4. The total spin values (per unit cell) of MoO3 configurations with different vacancies of 6% concentration.
总自旋h·bar/2/单胞 完整晶体 VMo VO-Ⅰ VO-Ⅱ VO-Ⅲ $\alpha $-MoO3 8.206 7.7855 8.235 8.244 8.214 MoO3 -Ⅱ 4.395 3.995 4.770 4.800 4.378 -
[1] Novoselov K S, Mishchenko A, Carvalho A, Castro Neto A H 2016 Science 353 aac9439Google Scholar
[2] Lin S Y, Wang C M, Kao K S, Chen Y C, Liu C C 2010 J. Sol-Gel Sci. Techn. 53 51Google Scholar
[3] Rahmani M, Keshmiri S, Yu J, Sadek A, Al-Mashat L, Moafi A, Latham K, Li Y, Wlodarski W, Kalantar-zadeh K 2010 Actuat. B: Chem. 145 13Google Scholar
[4] Chen Y, Lu C, Xu L, Ma Y, Hou W, Zhu J J 2010 Cryst. Eng. Commun. 12 3740Google Scholar
[5] Huang L, Xu H, Zhang R, Cheng X, Xia J, Xu Y, Li H 2013 Appl. Surf. Sci. 283 25Google Scholar
[6] Kumar V, Sumboja A, Wang J, Bhavanasi V, Nguyen V C, Lee P S 2014 Chem. Mater. 26 5533Google Scholar
[7] Sreedhara M, Matte H, Govindaraj A, Rao C 2013 Chem. Asian J. 8 2430Google Scholar
[8] Balendhran S, Deng J, Ou J Z, Walia S, Scott J, Tang J, Wang K L, Field M R, Russo S, Zhuiykov S, Strano M S, Medhekar N, Sriram S, Bhaskaran M, Kalantar-zadeh K 2013 Adv. Mater. 25 109Google Scholar
[9] Zhou G, Xu X, Yu J, Feng B, Zhang Y, Hu J, Zhou Y 2014 Cryst. Eng. Commun. 16 9025Google Scholar
[10] Liu D, Lei W W, Hao J, Liu D D, Liu B B, Wang X, Chen X H, Cui Q L, Zou G T, Liu J, Jiang S 2009 J. Appl. Phys. 105 023513Google Scholar
[11] Baker B, Feist T P, Mccarron E M 1995 J. Solid State Chem. 119 199Google Scholar
[12] Wang F, Pang Z, Lin L, Fang S, Dai Y, Han S 2009 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 321 3067Google Scholar
[13] Peng H, Li J, Li S S, Xia J B 2009 Phys. Rev. B 79 092411Google Scholar
[14] Han X, Lee J, Yoo H I 2009 Phys. Rev. B 79 100403(R)Google Scholar
[15] Venkatesan M, Fitzgerald C B, Coey J M D 2004 Nature 430 630Google Scholar
[16] Gacic M, Jakob G, Herbort C, Adrian H, Tietze T, Brück S, Goering E 2007 Phys. Rev. B 75 205206Google Scholar
[17] Hu J, Zhang Z, Zhao M, Qin H, Jiang M 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 93 192503Google Scholar
[18] Sundaresan A, Bhargavi R, Rangarajan N, Siddesh U, Rao C N R 2006 Phys. Rev. B 74 161306(R)Google Scholar
[19] Zuo X, Yoon S D, Yang A, Duan W H, Vittoria C, Harris V G 2009 J. Appl. Phys. 105 07C508Google Scholar
[20] Rahman G, García-Suárez V M, Hong S C 2008 Phys. Rev. B 78 184404Google Scholar
[21] Wang F, Pang Z, Lin L, Fang S, Dai Y, Han S 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 144424Google Scholar
[22] Peng H, Xiang H J, Wei S H, Li S S, Xia J B, Li J 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 017201Google Scholar
[23] Thakur P, Cezar J C, Brookes N B, Choudhary R J, Prakash R, Phase D M, Chae K H, Kumar R 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 062501Google Scholar
[24] Okumu J, Koerfer F, Salinga C, Wutting M 2004 J. Appl. Phys. 95 7632Google Scholar
[25] Wang F, Pang Z, Lin L, Fang S, Dai Y, Han S 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 134407Google Scholar
[26] Ding H, Ray K G, Ozolins V, Asta M 2012 Phys. Rev. B 85 012104
[27] Peelaers H, Van de Walle C G 2014 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 26 305502Google Scholar
[28] Ding H, Lin H, Sadigh B, Zhou F, Ozolinš V, Asta M 2014 J. Phys. Chem. C 118 15565Google Scholar
[29] Kröger M, Hamwi S, Meyer J, Riedl T, Kowalsky W, Kahn A 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 123301Google Scholar
[30] Becke A D 1993 J. Chem. Phys. 98 5648Google Scholar
[31] Perdew J P, Chevary J A, Vosko S H, Jackson K A, Pederson M R, Singh D J, Fiolhais C 1992 Phys. Rev. B 46 6671Google Scholar
[32] Tkatchenko A, Scheffler M 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 073005Google Scholar
[33] Krukau A V, Vydrov O A, Izmaylov A F, Scuseria G E 2006 J. Chem. Phys. 125 224106Google Scholar
[34] Cococcioni M, Gironcoli S 2005 Phys. Rev. B 71 035105Google Scholar
[35] Kress G, Joubert D 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 1758
[36] Milman V, Lee M H, Payne M C 1994 Phys. Rev. B 49 16300Google Scholar
[37] Payne M C, Teter M P, Allan D C, Arias T A, Joannopoulos J D 1992 Rev. Mod. Phys. 64 1045Google Scholar
[38] Marzari N, Vanderbilt D, Payne M C 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 1337Google Scholar
[39] Chantis A N, Christensen N E, Svane A, Cardona M 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 205205Google Scholar
[40] Pfrommer B G, Cote M, Louie S G, Cohen M L 1997 J. Comput. Phys. 131 233Google Scholar
[41] Segall M D, Shah R, Pickard C J, Payne M C 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 16317Google Scholar
[42] Negishi H, Negishi S, Kuroiwa Y, Sato N, Aoyagi S 2004 Phys. Rev. B 69 064111Google Scholar
[43] Kalantar-zadeh K, Tang J, Wang M, Wang K L, Shailos A, Galatsis K, Kojima R, Strong V, Lech A, Wlodarski W, Kaner R B 2010 Nanoscale 2 429Google Scholar
[44] Dandogbessi B S, Akin-Ojo O 2016 J. Appl. Phys. 120 055105Google Scholar
[45] Zhong M Z, Zhou K, Wei Z M, Li Y, Li T, Dong H L, Jiang L, Li J B, Hu W P 2018 2D Mater. 5 035033Google Scholar
计量
- 文章访问数: 18606
- PDF下载量: 279
- 被引次数: 0