搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

霍尔推力器中电子碰撞及等离子体密度和磁场梯度激发的不稳定性

杨三祥 赵以德 代鹏 李建鹏 谷增杰 孟伟 耿海 郭宁 贾艳辉 杨俊泰

引用本文:
Citation:

霍尔推力器中电子碰撞及等离子体密度和磁场梯度激发的不稳定性

杨三祥, 赵以德, 代鹏, 李建鹏, 谷增杰, 孟伟, 耿海, 郭宁, 贾艳辉, 杨俊泰

Instabilities triggered by electron collision and gradient of plasma density and magnetic field in the Hall thruster

Yang San-Xiang, Zhao Yi-De, Dai Peng, Li Jian-Peng, Gu Zeng-Jie, Meng Wei, Geng Hai, Guo Ning, Jia Yan-Hui, Yang Jun-Tai
PDF
导出引用
  • 在霍尔推力器中,电子漂移、电子碰撞,以及等离子体密度、温度、磁场梯度所蕴含的自由能会驱动各种频率和波长的不稳定性。不稳定性的存在会破坏等离子体的稳定放电,削弱推力器与电源处理单元的匹配度,降低推力器的性能。基于此,本文利用基于流体模型推导的色散关系研究了霍尔推力器中由电子碰撞、等离子体密度和磁场梯度驱动的不稳定性。结果表明:1)在考虑电子惯性、电子与中性原子的碰撞、以及电子E×B漂移时能够在推力器近阳极区到羽流区内的任一轴向位置处激发不稳定性。随着角向波数ky的增加(k=2π/λλ为波长),模式将从由碰撞激发的低杂波不稳定性转变为离子声波不稳定性。当ky=10m-1时,最大增长率γmax 对应频率 ωr随着碰撞频率νen 的增加而轻微减小;当ky=300m-1时,γmax对应的频率ωr以及最大频率ωrmax几乎不随碰撞频率变化。不依赖于ky的大小,对于碰撞激发的不稳定性,模式的增长率随着碰撞频率的增加而增加。同时考虑电子惯性、电子碰撞效应,以及密度梯度时,密度梯度对驱动不稳定性占主导作用。模式的动力学行为不会随ky的增加而变化,但模式的本征值随ky的增加而增加。在密度梯度κN=0的两侧,由于密度梯度引起的抗磁性漂移频率ωs的符号发生了变化,模式的本征值在κN=0两侧有相反的变化趋势:当ω*ωr符号相反时,密度梯度对不稳定性的激发有削弱作用(κN>0);当ω*ωr符号相同时,密度梯度对不稳定性的激发有增强作用(κN<0);3)在模型中同时考虑等离子体密度梯度、磁场梯度,以及电子惯性和碰撞效应时,模式本征值的变化依赖于电子的漂移频率,以及密度和磁场梯度引起的抗磁性漂移频率的相对大小。当仅包含密度梯度和磁场梯度时,推力器放电通道内将出现稳定窗,即增长率为0的区间;包含电子惯性和碰撞效应后,稳定窗消失。
    The free energy contained in electron drift, electron collision, and gradient of plasma density, temperature, magnetic can trigger the different frequency and wavelength instabilities in hall thrusters. The instabilities will destroy the stable discharge of plasma, affect the matching degree between the thruster and the power processing unit, and down the performance of the thruster. Based on this, the instabilities triggered by electron collision and gradient of plasma density and magnetic field in the hall thruster is studied by using dispersion relation derived from the fluid model. The results show that: 1) The instabilities can be excited at any axial position from the near anode region of the thruster to the plume region when the effect of electron inertia、electron collision with neutral atoms and electron drift are included in the model. The transition of the lower-hybrid mode excited by electron collision into the ion sound mode take place with the azimuthal wavenumber ky is increasing. Where k=2π/λλ is the wave length. The real frequency ωr corresponding to the maximum growth rate γmax slightly decreases with collision frequency increasing for ky=10m-1. However, the maximum real frequency and real frequency ωr corresponding to the maximum growth rate γmax will not change with collision frequency varying for ky=300m-1. Independent on the size of ky, the growth rate of mode triggered by electron collision increases with collision frequency increasing. 2) The plasma density gradient effect plays the dominant role in driving instabilities when the electron inertia, electron-neutral collisions and plasma density gradient are simultaneously included in the model. The dynamic behavior of the model does not change with the increasing of ky, but the eigenvalue of the model increases with the ky increasing. Since the sign of anti-drift frequency induced by the plasma density gradient is changed, and the mode eigenvalue have the opposite change trend on both sides of point κN=0. When the sign of ωs and ωr are opposite, the density gradient effect has a stabilization effect on instability excitation (κN>0). When the sign of ωs and ωr are same, the density gradient effect enhances the excitation of instability (κN<0) .3) If the gradient of the plasma density and magnetic field, electron inertia and electron-neutral collisions are included in the dispersion, the mode eigenvalue relies on the size of electron drift frequency, and the diamagnetic drift frequency induced by the gradient of density and magnetic field. When the density gradient and magnetic gradient effect are considered, there is a stable window in the discharge channel. However,if the electron inertia and electron-neutral collisions are also included, the stable window will disappear.
  • [1]

    Koo J W, Boyd I D 2006 Phys. Plasmas 13 033501

    [2]

    Lazurenko A, Coduti G, Mazouffre S, Bonhomme G 2008 Phys. Plasmas 15 034502

    [3]

    Appleton B R, Moak C D, Noggle T S, Barrett J H 1972 Phys. Rev.Lett. 281307

    [4]

    Anders A, Ni P, Rauch A 2012 J. Appl. Phys.111 053304

    [5]

    Brenning N, Lundin D, Minea T, Costin C, Vitelaru C 2013 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 46 084005

    [6]

    Smolyakov A I, Chapurin O, Frias W, Kosakarov O, Romadanov I, Tang T, Umansky M, Raitses Y, Kaganovich I D, Lakhin V P 2017 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 59 014041

    [7]

    Boeuf J P, Takahashi M 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 18 124

    [8]

    Boeuf J P, Garrigues L 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 061204

    [9]

    Morozov K N, Esipchuk Y V, Kapulkin A, Nevrovskii V, Smirnov V A 1972 Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys. 17 482-7

    [10]

    Esipchuk Y V, Tilinin G N 1976 Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys. 21 417-23

    [11]

    Gorshkov O A, Tomilin D A, Shagaida A A 2012 Plasma Phys. Rep. 38 271-7

    [12]

    Tomilin D 2013 Phys. Plasmas 20 042103

    [13]

    Romadanov I, Smolyakov A, Raitses Y, Kaganovich I D, Tang T, Ryzhkov S 2016 Phys. Plasmas 23 122111

    [14]

    Lakhin V P, Ilgisonis V I, Smolyakov A I, Sorokina E A, Marusov N A 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 012106

    [15]

    Marusov N A, Sorokina E A, Lakhin V P, Ilgisonis A I, Smolyakov A I 2019 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol.28 015002

    [16]

    Boeuf J P 2017 J. Plasma Phys. 121 011101

    [17]

    Ducrocq A, Adam J C, Héron A, Laval G, 2006 Phys. Plasmas 13 102111

    [18]

    Lafleur T, Baalrud S D, Chabert P 2016 Phys. Plasmas 23 053502

    [19]

    Boeuf J P, Garrigues L 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 061204

    [20]

    Tavant A, Croes V, Lucken R, Lafleur T, Bourdon A, Chabert P 2018 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 27 124001

    [21]

    Taccogna F, Minelli P, Asadi Z, Bogopolsky G 2019 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 28 064002

    [22]

    Mandal D, Elskens Y, Lemoine N, Doveil F 2020 Phys. Plasmas 27 032301

    [23]

    Chen L, Kan Z C,Gao W F, et al 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 015203

    [24]

    Morozov A I,Esipchuk Y V, Kapulkin A M, Nevrovskii V A, Smirnov V A 1972 Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys. 17 482

    [25]

    Artsimovich L A,Andronov I M, Esipchuk Y V, Bersukov I A, Kozubskii K N 1974 Kosm. Issled. 12 451

    [26]

    Frias W, A I, Smolyakov, Kaganovich I D, Raitses Y 2012 Phys. Plasmas 19 072112

    [27]

    Romadanov I,Smolyakov A,Raitses Y,Kaganovich I, Tian T, Ryzhkov S 2016 Phys. Plasmas 23 122111

    [28]

    Lakhin V P, Ilgisonis V I, Smolyakov A I, Sorokina E A, Marusov N A 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 012106

    [29]

    Marusov N A, Sorokina E A, Lakhin V P, Ilgisonis A I, Smolyakov A I 2019 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 28 015002

    [30]

    Koshkarov O 2018 P.D. dissertation (Saskatoon: Saskatchewan University)

    [31]

    Kronhaus I, Kapulkin A, Balabanov V, Rubanovich M, Guelman M, Natan B 2012 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 45 175023

    [32]

    Litvak A A, Fisch N J 2001 Phys. Plasmas 8 648-51

    [33]

    Boeuf J P, Smolyakov A 2023 Phys. Plasmas 30 050901

    [34]

    Litvak A A, Fisch N J 2000 PPPL Reports posted on the U.S. Department of Energy’s Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Publications and Reports web site in Calendar Year 2000. The home page for PPPL Reports and Publications is: http://www.pppl.gov/pub_report/PPPL-3521

    [35]

    Boeuf J P 2014 Front. Phys. 2 74

    [36]

    Lampe M, Manheimer W M, McBride J B, Orens J H, Shanny R, Sudan R N 1971 Phys. Rev. Lett. 26 1221

    [37]

    Lampe M, Manheimer W M, McBride J B, Orens J H, Papadopoulos K, Shanny R, Sudan R N, 1972 Phys. Fluids 15 662.

    [38]

    McBride J B, Ott E, Boris J P, Orens J H 1972 Phys. Fluids 15 2367–83

    [39]

    Taccogna F, Garrigues 2019 Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics 3:12

  • [1] 马莉莉, 张世平, 张芳军, 李麦娟, 蒋军, 丁晓彬, 颉录有, 张登红, 董晨钟. W6+离子的电子碰撞电离研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240408
    [2] 杨三祥, 赵以德, 代鹏, 李建鹏, 耿海, 杨俊泰, 贾艳辉, 郭宁. 羽流区磁场对霍尔推力器性能影响的二维模拟研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20241331
    [3] 杨三祥, 郭宁, 贾艳辉, 耿海, 高俊, 刘家涛, 刘士永, 杨盛林. 霍尔推力器中呼吸振荡激发机理及影响因素. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230009
    [4] 杨三祥, 王倩楠, 高俊, 贾艳辉, 耿海, 郭宁, 陈新伟, 袁兴龙, 张鹏. 径向磁场对霍尔推力器性能影响的数值模拟研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212386
    [5] 王文钊, 胡碧涛, 郑皓, 屠小青, 高朋林, 闫松, 郭文传, 闫海洋. 一种可用于极化3He实验的新型磁场系统. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180571
    [6] 王鹏, 薛纭, 楼智美. 黏性流体中超细长弹性杆的动力学不稳定性. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.66.094501
    [7] 谭文静, 安竹, 朱敬军, 赵建玲, 刘慢天. 10-25 keV电子致厚W,Au靶韧致辐射谱的测量. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.65.113401
    [8] 王通, 王晓方. 激光尾场加速电子的密度梯度注入的解析处理. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.65.044102
    [9] 张恒, 段文山. 二维玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚中孤立波的调制不稳定性. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.62.044703
    [10] 卿绍伟, 鄂鹏, 段萍. 壁面二次电子发射对霍尔推力器放电通道绝缘壁面双鞘特性的影响. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.62.055202
    [11] 魏琪, 鄂文汲. 薄膜去湿不稳定性的热力学分析. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.61.160508
    [12] 卿绍伟, 鄂鹏, 段萍. 电子温度各向异性对霍尔推力器中等离子体与壁面相互作用的影响. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.61.205202
    [13] 于达仁, 卿绍伟, 王晓钢, 丁永杰, 段萍. 电子温度各向异性对霍尔推力器BN绝缘壁面鞘层特性的影响. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.60.025204
    [14] 邓立赟, 蓝红梅, 刘悦. 霍尔推力器磁场位形及其优化的数值研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.60.025213
    [15] 鄂鹏, 段萍, 魏立秋, 白德宇, 江滨浩, 徐殿国. 真空背压对霍尔推力器放电特性影响的实验研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.59.8676
    [16] 鄂鹏, 段萍, 江滨浩, 刘辉, 魏立秋, 徐殿国. 磁场梯度对Hall推力器放电特性影响的实验研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.59.7182
    [17] 鄂鹏, 韩轲, 武志文, 于达仁. 磁场强度对霍尔推力器放电特性影响的实验研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.58.2535
    [18] 王光昶, 郑志坚, 谷渝秋, 陈 涛, 张 婷. 利用渡越辐射研究超热电子在固体靶中的输运过程. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.56.982
    [19] 魏新华, 周国成, 曹晋滨, 李柳元. 无碰撞电流片低频电磁模不稳定性:MHD模型. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.54.3228
    [20] 简广德, 董家齐. 环形等离子体中电子温度梯度不稳定性的粒子模拟. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.52.1656
计量
  • 文章访问数:  90
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 上网日期:  2024-12-06

/

返回文章
返回