-
近年来, 铅卤钙钛矿CsPbX3 (X = Cl, Br或I)因其具有荧光波段可调、荧光量子产率高(Photoluminescence quantum yield, PLQY)以及荧光半峰宽窄等优点而被广泛应用于光电器件领域. 然而, 与PLQY接近于100%的绿光和红光相比, 蓝光卤素钙钛矿的PLQY仍比较低. 在此, 采用过饱和结晶的方法在室温下合成了粒径低于4 nm的超小晶粒锡(Sn)掺杂CsPbBr3量子点, 并对其结构特性和光学特性进行了研究. 结果表明: 随着SnBr2添加量的增大, 量子点晶粒的粒径略微减小, 荧光发射峰发生蓝移, 粒径由3.33 nm (SnBr2为0.03 mmol)减小到2.23 nm(SnBr2为0.06 mmol时), 对应的荧光发射峰由490 nm蓝移至472 nm. 当SnBr2添加量为0.05 mmol时合成的超小晶粒锡掺杂CsPbBr3量子点显示出最优的光学性能, 其粒径约为2.91 nm, 对应的XRD各晶面衍射峰强度最强, 荧光发射峰位于472 nm处, PLQY最高, 达到了53.4%, 在空气中存放15 d后, 其荧光发射峰位置不发生明显改变, 荧光PLQY仍保留最初的80%, 为42.7%. 证明适量添加SnBr2对CsPbBr3进行锡掺杂可有效提高超小晶粒量子点的结晶性能和光学性能.
-
关键词:
- 超小晶粒 /
- 锡掺杂CsPbBr3量子点 /
- 光学性能 /
- 荧光稳定
All-inorganic perovskite CsPbX3 (X = Cl, Br and I) quantum dots (QDs) have been wildly utilized in optoelectronic devices due to their tunable photoluminescence, high photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY), and narrow-line width photoluminescence. However, the blue luminescence PLQY of CsPbX3 perovskite quantum dots is still lower than their red and green luminescence counterparts (PLQYs nearly 100%). Here in this work, we present a handy strategy to synthesise the ultra-small blue luminescence Tin-doped CsPbBr3 perovskite QDs by supersaturated recrystallization synthetic approach at room temperature, and the particle size of as-prepared QDs is lower than 4 nm. The crystal structure and optical property of Tin doped CsPbBr3 QDs are characterized by XRD, TEM, ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer, and fluorescence spectrophotometer. The results show that the particle size of as-prepared QDs is slightly shrunk from 3.33 nm (SnBr2 0.03 mmol) to 2.23 nm (SnBr2 0.06 mmol) as the SnBr2 adding quantity increases, but there is no obvious change in the lattice spacing of doped QDs. The partial substitution of Pb for Tin leads the optical spectra to blue-shift from 490 nm (SnBr2 0.03 mmol) to 472 nm (SnBr2 0.06 mmol). The highest PLQY and the strongest XRD diffraction of ultra-small Tin doped CsPbBr3blue luminescence QDs are obtained by adding SnBr2 0.05 mmol, and the blue luminescence peak is located at 472 nm with the PLQY of 53.4%. There is no any change in PL peak of Tin doped CsPbBr3 QDs (SnBr2 0.05 mmol) by storing it under the ambient atmosphere for 15 days, and the PLQY of Sn2+ doped QDs is still 80% of the initial after 15 days. It is concluded that the crystallization and optical property can be effectively improved in Tin doped CsPbBr3 QDs by partially replacing appropriate quantity of Pb by Tin.-
Keywords:
- ultra-small /
- tin doped CsPbBr3 quantum dots /
- optical property /
- stable luminescence
[1] Li C L, Han C, Zhang Y B, Zang Z G, Wang M, Tang X S, Du J 2017 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 172 341
Google Scholar
[2] Li C L, Zang Z G, Han C, Hu Z P, Tang X S, Du J, Leng Y X, Sun K 2017 Nano Energy 40 195
Google Scholar
[3] Song J Z, Tao F, Li J H, Xu L M, Zhang F J, Han B N, Shan Q S, Zeng H B 2018 Adv. Mater. 30 1805409
Google Scholar
[4] Tang X S, Hu Z P, Chen W W, Xing X, Zang Z G, Hu W, Qiu J, Du J, Leng Y X, Jiang X F, Mai L Q 2016 Nano Energy 28 462
Google Scholar
[5] Zhang X, Lin H, Huang H, Reckmeier C, Zhang Y, Choy W C, Rogach A L 2016 Nano Lett. 16 1415
Google Scholar
[6] 瞿子涵, 储泽马, 张兴旺, 游经碧 2019 物理学报 68 158504
Google Scholar
Qu Z H, Chu Z M, Zhang X W, You J B 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 158504
Google Scholar
[7] Shirasaki Y, Supran G J, Bawendi M G, Bulović V 2012 Nat. Photon. 7 13
[8] Protesescu L, Yakunin S, Bodnarchuk M I, Krieg F, Caputo R, Hendon C H, Yang R X, Walsh A, Kovalenko M V 2015 Nano Lett. 15 3692
Google Scholar
[9] Liu F, Zhang Y H, Ding C, Kobayashi S, Izuishi T, Nakazawa N, Toyoda T, Ohta T, Hayase S, Minemoto T, Yoshino K, Dai S, Shen Q 2017 ACS Nano 11 10373
Google Scholar
[10] 段聪聪, 程露, 殷垚, 朱琳 2019 物理学报 68 158503
Google Scholar
Duan C C, Cheng L, Yin Y, Zhu L 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 158503
Google Scholar
[11] 石文奇, 田宏, 陆玉新, 朱虹, 李芬, 王小霞, 刘燕文 2021 物理学报 70 087303
Google Scholar
Shi W Q, Tian H, Lu Y X, Zhu H, Li F, Wang X X, Liu Y W 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 087303
Google Scholar
[12] Chen W W, Xin X, Zang Z G, Tang X S, Li C L, Hu W, Zhou M, Du J 2017 J. Solid State Chem. 255 115
Google Scholar
[13] Guner T, Demir M M 2018 Phys. Status Solidi A 215 1800120
Google Scholar
[14] Li X M, Wu Y, Zhang S L, Cai B, Gu Y, Song J Z, Zeng H B 2016 Adv. Funct. Mater. 26 2435
Google Scholar
[15] Bi C H, Wang S X, Li Q, Kershaw S V, Tian J J, Rogach A L 2019 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10 943
Google Scholar
[16] Liu H W, Wu Z N, Shao J R, Yao D, Gao H, Liu Y, Yu W L, Zhang H, Yang B 2017 ACS Nano 11 2239
Google Scholar
[17] van der Stam W, Geuchies J J, Altantzis T, van den Bos K H, Meeldijk J D, Van Aert S, Bals S, Vanmaekelbergh D, de Mello Donega C 2017 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 4087
Google Scholar
[18] Liu M, Zhong G H, Yin Y M, Miao J S, Li K, Wang C Q, Xu X R, Shen C, Meng H 2017 Adv. Sci. 4 1700335
Google Scholar
[19] Li M, Zhang X, Matras-Postolek K, Chen H S, Yang P 2018 J. Mater. Chem. C 6 5506
Google Scholar
[20] Pradeep K R, Chakraborty S, Viswanatha R 2019 Mater. Res. Express 6 114004
Google Scholar
[21] Wang H C, Wang W G, Tang A C, Tsai H Y, Bao Z, Ihara T, Yarita N, Tahara H, Kanemitsu Y, Chen S M, Liu R S 2017 Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 56 13650
Google Scholar
[22] Zhang X T, Wang H, Hu Y, Pei Y X, Wang S X, Shi Z F, Colvin V L, Wang S N, Zhang Y, Yu W W 2019 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10 1750
Google Scholar
[23] Zhang X L, Cao W Y, Wang W G, Xu B, Liu S, Dai H T, Chen S M, Wang K, Sun X W 2016 Nano Energy 30 511
Google Scholar
[24] Veldhuis S A, Boix P P, Yantara N, Li M, Sum T C, Mathews N, Mhaisalkar S G 2016 Adv. Mater. 28 6804
Google Scholar
[25] Wang H C, Bao Z, Tsai H Y, Tang A C, Liu R S 2018 Small 14 1702433
Google Scholar
[26] Huang H, Susha A S, Kershaw S V, Hung T F, Rogach A L 2015 Adv. Sci. 2 1500194
Google Scholar
[27] Pan G C, Bai X, Xu W, Chen X, Zhai Y, Zhu J Y, Shao H, Ding N, Xu L, Dong B, Mao Y L, Song H W 2020 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 14195
Google Scholar
[28] Wang S X, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Zhang X T, Shen X Y, Zhuang X W, Lu P, Yu W W, Kershaw S V, Rogach A L 2019 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10 90
Google Scholar
-
图 2 锡掺杂CsPbBr3量子点的TEM图谱(标尺为20 nm) (a) SnBr2为0.03 mmol; (b) SnBr2为0.05 mmol; (c) SnBr2为0.06 mmol. (a) (b)中插图为对应TEM图量子点的HRTEM图谱(标尺为2 nm)
Fig. 2. TEM images of tin doped CsPbBr3 quantum dots (scale bars represent 20 nm): (a) SnBr2 is 0.03 mmol; (b) SnBr2 is 0.05 mmol; (c) SnBr2 is 0.06 mmol. Inset pictures show the HRTEM of corresponding quantum dots (scale bars represent 2 nm).
图 3 锡掺杂CsPbBr3量子点的Cs, Pb, Br和Sn元素的元素映射图像(SnBr2 为0.05 mmol), 标尺为50 nm
Fig. 3. Cs, Pb, Br, and Sn element mapping images of tin doped CsPbBr3 quantum dots (SnBr2 is 0.05 mmol). The scale bars represent 50 nm.
图 4 锡掺杂CsPbBr3量子点的EDS(SnBr2为0.05 mmol)
Fig. 4. EDS of tin doped CsPbBr3 quantum dots (SnBr2 0.05 mmol).
图 5 锡掺杂CsPbBr3量子点的 (a)吸收光谱; (b)荧光光谱; (c) PLQY
Fig. 5. (a) Absorption spectra; (b) emission spectra; (c) PLQY of tin doped CsPbBr3 quantum dots.
图 6 锡离子掺杂CsPbBr3量子点的荧光衰减图
Fig. 6. Time-resolved PL decays of tin doped CsPbBr3 quantum dots.
图 7 锡离子掺杂CsPbBr3量子点大气氛围存放1—15 d的荧光峰位置及PLQY变化
Fig. 7. PL peak and PLQY of tin doped CsPbBr3 quantum dots from 1 to 15 days.
表 1 锡掺杂CsPbBr3量子点的衰减曲线拟合参数
Table 1. Fitting results fitted by time-resolved PL decays curve of tin doped CsPbBr3 quantum dots.
SnBr2/
mmolA1/
%τ1/
nsA2/
%τ2/
nsA3/
%τ3/
nsτavg/
ns0.03 12.36 3.60 69.05 9.33 18.59 26.17 16.09 0.04 4.52 1.83 69.01 9.16 26.48 22.92 15.81 0.05 7.43 2.09 63.97 8.96 28.60 25.07 17.73 0.06 4.42 1.65 69.56 8.10 26.03 21.64 14.78 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 τr, τnr, κr和κnr计算结果
Table 2. Calculate results of τr, τnr, κr和κnr.
SnBr2/
mmolτavg/
nsPLQY/
%τr/
nsτnr/
nsκr×107/
s–1κnr×107/
s–10.03 16.09 43.4 37.07 28.43 2.70 3.52 0.04 15.81 32.3 48.95 23.35 2.04 4.28 0.05 17.73 53.4 33.20 38.05 3.01 2.63 0.06 14.78 21.7 68.11 18.88 1.47 5.30
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Li C L, Han C, Zhang Y B, Zang Z G, Wang M, Tang X S, Du J 2017 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 172 341
Google Scholar
[2] Li C L, Zang Z G, Han C, Hu Z P, Tang X S, Du J, Leng Y X, Sun K 2017 Nano Energy 40 195
Google Scholar
[3] Song J Z, Tao F, Li J H, Xu L M, Zhang F J, Han B N, Shan Q S, Zeng H B 2018 Adv. Mater. 30 1805409
Google Scholar
[4] Tang X S, Hu Z P, Chen W W, Xing X, Zang Z G, Hu W, Qiu J, Du J, Leng Y X, Jiang X F, Mai L Q 2016 Nano Energy 28 462
Google Scholar
[5] Zhang X, Lin H, Huang H, Reckmeier C, Zhang Y, Choy W C, Rogach A L 2016 Nano Lett. 16 1415
Google Scholar
[6] 瞿子涵, 储泽马, 张兴旺, 游经碧 2019 物理学报 68 158504
Google Scholar
Qu Z H, Chu Z M, Zhang X W, You J B 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 158504
Google Scholar
[7] Shirasaki Y, Supran G J, Bawendi M G, Bulović V 2012 Nat. Photon. 7 13
[8] Protesescu L, Yakunin S, Bodnarchuk M I, Krieg F, Caputo R, Hendon C H, Yang R X, Walsh A, Kovalenko M V 2015 Nano Lett. 15 3692
Google Scholar
[9] Liu F, Zhang Y H, Ding C, Kobayashi S, Izuishi T, Nakazawa N, Toyoda T, Ohta T, Hayase S, Minemoto T, Yoshino K, Dai S, Shen Q 2017 ACS Nano 11 10373
Google Scholar
[10] 段聪聪, 程露, 殷垚, 朱琳 2019 物理学报 68 158503
Google Scholar
Duan C C, Cheng L, Yin Y, Zhu L 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 158503
Google Scholar
[11] 石文奇, 田宏, 陆玉新, 朱虹, 李芬, 王小霞, 刘燕文 2021 物理学报 70 087303
Google Scholar
Shi W Q, Tian H, Lu Y X, Zhu H, Li F, Wang X X, Liu Y W 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 087303
Google Scholar
[12] Chen W W, Xin X, Zang Z G, Tang X S, Li C L, Hu W, Zhou M, Du J 2017 J. Solid State Chem. 255 115
Google Scholar
[13] Guner T, Demir M M 2018 Phys. Status Solidi A 215 1800120
Google Scholar
[14] Li X M, Wu Y, Zhang S L, Cai B, Gu Y, Song J Z, Zeng H B 2016 Adv. Funct. Mater. 26 2435
Google Scholar
[15] Bi C H, Wang S X, Li Q, Kershaw S V, Tian J J, Rogach A L 2019 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10 943
Google Scholar
[16] Liu H W, Wu Z N, Shao J R, Yao D, Gao H, Liu Y, Yu W L, Zhang H, Yang B 2017 ACS Nano 11 2239
Google Scholar
[17] van der Stam W, Geuchies J J, Altantzis T, van den Bos K H, Meeldijk J D, Van Aert S, Bals S, Vanmaekelbergh D, de Mello Donega C 2017 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 4087
Google Scholar
[18] Liu M, Zhong G H, Yin Y M, Miao J S, Li K, Wang C Q, Xu X R, Shen C, Meng H 2017 Adv. Sci. 4 1700335
Google Scholar
[19] Li M, Zhang X, Matras-Postolek K, Chen H S, Yang P 2018 J. Mater. Chem. C 6 5506
Google Scholar
[20] Pradeep K R, Chakraborty S, Viswanatha R 2019 Mater. Res. Express 6 114004
Google Scholar
[21] Wang H C, Wang W G, Tang A C, Tsai H Y, Bao Z, Ihara T, Yarita N, Tahara H, Kanemitsu Y, Chen S M, Liu R S 2017 Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 56 13650
Google Scholar
[22] Zhang X T, Wang H, Hu Y, Pei Y X, Wang S X, Shi Z F, Colvin V L, Wang S N, Zhang Y, Yu W W 2019 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10 1750
Google Scholar
[23] Zhang X L, Cao W Y, Wang W G, Xu B, Liu S, Dai H T, Chen S M, Wang K, Sun X W 2016 Nano Energy 30 511
Google Scholar
[24] Veldhuis S A, Boix P P, Yantara N, Li M, Sum T C, Mathews N, Mhaisalkar S G 2016 Adv. Mater. 28 6804
Google Scholar
[25] Wang H C, Bao Z, Tsai H Y, Tang A C, Liu R S 2018 Small 14 1702433
Google Scholar
[26] Huang H, Susha A S, Kershaw S V, Hung T F, Rogach A L 2015 Adv. Sci. 2 1500194
Google Scholar
[27] Pan G C, Bai X, Xu W, Chen X, Zhai Y, Zhu J Y, Shao H, Ding N, Xu L, Dong B, Mao Y L, Song H W 2020 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 14195
Google Scholar
[28] Wang S X, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Zhang X T, Shen X Y, Zhuang X W, Lu P, Yu W W, Kershaw S V, Rogach A L 2019 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10 90
Google Scholar
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 5875
- PDF下载量: 123
- 被引次数: 0
